Next Article in Journal
A Multimodal Polygraph Framework with Optimized Machine Learning for Robust Deception Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Heating Block as an Aid for the DNA-Based Biosensing of Plant Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comparative Review of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Designs: Savonius Rotor vs. Darrieus Rotor

1
Department of Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications Named After Gumarbek Daukeyev, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Smart Technologies in Engineering, International Engineering and Technological University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Telecommunications, University of Ruse, 8 Studentska Str., 7004 Ruse, Bulgaria
4
Department of Electric Power Engineering, University of Ruse, 8 Studentska Str., 7004 Ruse, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inventions 2025, 10(6), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions10060095
Submission received: 12 September 2025 / Revised: 14 October 2025 / Accepted: 24 October 2025 / Published: 27 October 2025

Abstract

This paper reviews and analyzes three types of vertical-axis wind rotors: the classic Savonius, spiral Savonius, and Darrieus designs. Using numerical modeling methods, including computational fluid dynamics (CFD), their aerodynamic characteristics, power output, and efficiency under different operating conditions are examined. Key parameters such as lift, drag, torque, and power coefficient are compared to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each rotor. Results highlight that the Darrieus rotor demonstrates the highest efficiency at higher wind speeds due to lift-based operation, while the spiral Savonius offers improved stability, smoother torque characteristics, and adaptability in turbulent or low-wind environments. The classic Savonius, though less efficient, remains simple, cost-effective, and suitable for small-scale urban applications where reliability is prioritized over high performance. In addition, the study outlines the importance of blade geometry, tip speed ratio, and advanced materials in enhancing rotor durability and efficiency. The integration of modern optimization approaches, such as CFD-based design improvements and machine learning techniques, is emphasized as a promising pathway for developing more reliable and sustainable vertical-axis wind turbines. Although the primary analysis relies on numerical simulations, the observed performance trends are consistent with findings reported in experimental studies, indicating that the results are practically meaningful for design screening, technology selection, and siting decisions. Unlike prior studies that analyze Savonius and Darrieus rotors in isolation or under heterogeneous setups, this work (i) establishes a harmonized, fully specified CFD configuration (common domain, BCs, turbulence/near-wall treatment, time-stepping) enabling like-for-like comparison; (ii) couples the transient aerodynamic loads p(θ,t) into a dynamic FEA + fatigue pipeline (rainflow + Miner with mean-stress correction), going beyond static loading proxies; (iii) quantifies a prototype-stage materials choice rationale (aluminum) with a validated migration path to orthotropic composites; and (iv) reports reproducible wake/torque metrics that are cross-checked against mature models (DMST/actuator-cylinder), providing design-ready envelopes for small/medium VAWTs. Overall, the work provides recommendations for selecting rotor types under different wind conditions and operational scenarios to maximize energy conversion performance and long-term reliability.

1. Introduction

The modern challenges associated with global climate change and the depletion of traditional energy sources are pushing humanity towards more sustainable and eco-friendly solutions. Wind energy, being one of the fastest-growing areas of renewable energy, plays a crucial role in achieving goals related to reducing carbon dioxide emissions and lowering dependency on fossil fuels [1,2]. In recent years, special attention has been paid to the development and improvement of vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) due to their potential efficiency in urban environments and in complex wind conditions [3]. Unlike horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs), which typically use yaw systems to align with changing wind directions—active nacelle yaw on utility-scale machines and passive tail vanes on small HAWTs—vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) accept wind from any azimuth and therefore do not require a yaw mechanism. This distinction concerns how direction changes are accommodated (mechanical yaw in HAWTs vs. azimuthal symmetry in VAWTs), not whether operation in variable winds is possible [4]; VAWTs may simplify siting in constrained/turbulent flows, whereas HAWTs can maintain alignment via yaw control.
One of the simplest and most reliable types of vertical-axis turbines is the Savonius rotor, which operates on the principle of air resistance. Its design is appealing due to its simplicity and resistance to turbulent flows, making this rotor especially popular for small-scale installations and low wind speeds [5]. However, the main issue with the Savonius rotor is its relatively low power coefficient (Cp), which limits its efficiency in converting wind energy into mechanical work. Nevertheless, various studies have shown that through the optimization of blade geometry and the use of guiding devices, the aerodynamic performance of the Savonius rotor can be significantly improved [6,7].
In contrast to the Savonius rotor, the Darrieus rotor utilizes the principle of lift force, which allows it to convert wind energy more efficiently at higher speeds. The blades of the Darrieus rotor generate lift force similar to an airplane wing, resulting in increased power and efficiency of the generator [8]. However, this type of rotor also has its challenges related to turbulence and the complexity of optimizing the blade attack angles, which can vary depending on wind speed and other factors [9]. Despite this, research indicates that optimizing the blade attack angle and using modern materials can substantially improve the performance of these rotors [10].
Numerical methods, such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD), have become an integral part of research and optimization of rotor aerodynamic characteristics. CFD allows the modeling of complex interactions between airflows and blades, analyzing the influence of various parameters such as wind speed, blade shape, and attack angle on rotor performance [11]. These methods are particularly important for VAWTs, as they help researchers better understand rotor behavior in unstable airflow conditions, typical of urban environments [12]. CFD also enables more accurate performance predictions in real operating conditions and optimizes the design for increased power coefficients [13].
The relevance of this study also lies in the need to develop effective solutions to enhance the durability and longevity of VAWTs. Not only aerodynamic characteristics but also the choice of materials for the blades play a crucial role, as they must withstand high loads in strong winds and minimize wear and tear. Modern composite materials and nanotechnologies open new possibilities for improving rotor characteristics, increasing their strength, and reducing weight [14,15]. This not only improves the longevity of the rotors but also enhances their overall efficiency by reducing energy losses.
Moreover, the implementation of machine learning methods in the design and optimization processes of wind turbines opens new horizons for developing more advanced VAWT models. Machine learning allows the analysis of large volumes of data obtained from both experiments and simulations, identifying key patterns that can be used to improve rotor designs and predict their performance under various conditions [16]. Machine learning algorithms can significantly reduce development time and improve the accuracy of predictions, which is particularly important when designing turbines for challenging operating conditions.
In study [17], the use of a trapped-vortex cavity with localized suction on the suction side of Darrieus blades was shown to stabilize the shear layer, delay separation at low–moderate tip-speed ratios, improve lift-to-drag over the azimuthal cycle, and thereby increase power output; this control-augmented approach provides a practical reference for future optimization within our harmonized CFD–FEA–fatigue baseline.
This study aims to conduct numerical simulations of Savonius and Darrieus rotors for their comparative analysis. The main focus is on the aerodynamic characteristics of the rotors at different wind speeds and in turbulent conditions, typical of urban environments. The results of the simulations will provide a deeper understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each rotor type and suggest possible ways for their further optimization. Additionally, the study will examine the use of modern materials and numerical methods to enhance the efficiency and reliability of the rotors. The conclusion will present recommendations for improving the efficiency of these rotors in real-world conditions and the possibilities for their use in various scenarios. To ensure practical meaning, the setup and parameter ranges mirror field conditions and the key trends are cross-checked against peer-reviewed experimental reports on Savonius and Darrieus VAWTs, confirming the expected hierarchy of Cp and torque characteristics [17].
A controlled, reproducible comparison between Savonius and straight-bladed Darrieus rotors is undertaken, with aerodynamic and structural inferences drawn from a single, explicitly documented pipeline. Specifically: (1) a unified CFD setup is applied to both rotors—including geometry scaling, blockage control, inlet turbulence specification, sliding-mesh kinematics, and y+ management; (2) time-resolved aerodynamic loads are propagated to structural response and fatigue-life estimates, rather than relying on steady-pressure surrogates; and (3) material trade-offs at prototype scale are documented with a clear equivalence mapping to composite layups. This design-oriented framing distinguishes the present work from prior analyses that emphasize a single rotor type, employ single-physics simulation, or omit reproducibility details.

2. Studies on Improving the Aerodynamics and Optimization of VAWTs

Vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) are a significant area of research in renewable energy due to their potential for use in urban environments and complex wind conditions, typical of dense urban areas and regions with high air turbulence [18]. Unlike horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs), which require open spaces and wind orientation, VAWTs can operate efficiently regardless of wind direction. This makes them ideal for installation on building rooftops, narrow street corridors, and other locations with limited access to stable wind flows. However, despite their advantages, their widespread adoption remains limited due to several issues, such as limited aerodynamic efficiency, low power coefficient, and increased energy losses in turbulent conditions. The primary limitations of VAWTs stem from their structural characteristics and the challenges in optimizing the blades to improve energy capture efficiency. A literature review shows that various approaches have been proposed to address these issues, focusing on rotor aerodynamic improvements, material enhancements, and numerical methods for modeling and analyzing turbine performance [19]. The development of technology and the implementation of innovative solutions have become key factors in advancing the efficiency and reducing the production costs of VAWTs.
The aerodynamics of Savonius and Darrieus rotors is one of the key areas of research in this field. The Savonius rotor, based on the principle of drag force, is one of the simplest and most reliable structural designs. In the study [20], it is shown that three-bladed Savonius rotor designs demonstrate improved aerodynamic characteristics compared to traditional two-bladed models. This is due to the increased swept area, allowing more effective wind energy capture and conversion. However, researchers note that despite this improvement, the low power coefficient remains a significant issue, requiring further design improvements and calculation methods to enhance the overall efficiency of wind turbines.
At the same time, improvements in Savonius rotor design are not limited to increasing the number of blades. Studies conducted in [21] suggest the use of guiding devices that help optimize airflow around the rotor, leading to a 15–20% increase in the power coefficient. These guiding devices provide more effective management of airflow, minimizing low-pressure and turbulence zones around the rotor, which improves the overall efficiency of the turbine. However, the authors note that further research in this area should focus on understanding the interaction between blade geometry and guiding devices to optimize real-world performance.
Ducted Savonius configurations with external power-augmenters have recently been characterized through a combined experimental–CFD framework, using sliding-mesh and DFBI techniques to replicate test-rig conditions and validate performance trends on a scaled rotor. Reported results indicate that the duct/augmenter system can materially influence the rotor’s aerodynamics in urban-integration and energy-recovery contexts (e.g., OWC), and the proposed workflow serves as a reproducible numerical characterization method for such layouts [22]
Additionally, other studies indicate the possibility of improving the aerodynamics of Savonius rotors through the use of asymmetric blade profiles, which reduce drag on the reverse side of rotation and, consequently, increase overall turbine efficiency [6]. Such modifications could raise the power coefficient to levels closer to the Darrieus rotor, opening new prospects for further research in this area.
Thus, the importance of continued research into the aerodynamics of Savonius and Darrieus rotors is evident. These studies will help improve their design, increase the power coefficient, and create more competitive solutions for use in complex wind conditions. Darrieus rotors, operating on the basis of lift force, are more efficient in higher wind speeds. The authors in [23] conducted CFD simulations, which showed that altering the blade’s attack angle improves the aerodynamic performance of Darrieus rotors. However, despite the positive results, precise optimization of this parameter remains an open question, as the impact of the attack angle on rotor performance strongly depends on wind speed, blade design, and other external factors. Optimizing the blade attack angle requires considering numerous variables, such as changing wind flows and turbulence, which can significantly alter the behavior of airflows around the blades. Even a slight change in the attack angle can either significantly improve aerodynamic performance or degrade turbine performance under unfavorable wind conditions [24]. This is because the blade attack angle directly affects lift and drag, and deviations from optimal values can result in energy losses or even cause dynamic instability in the system.
The study presented in [25] includes important results related to the use of H-shaped Darrieus rotors combined with permanent magnet generators, which led to a significant increase in wind turbine efficiency. One reason for the improved performance of such systems is the design feature of Darrieus rotors, which use lift force to generate energy, making them more efficient at high wind speeds. In H-shaped rotors, the blades are connected to a central axis, contributing to even load distribution across the structure, reducing vibrations, and enhancing turbine stability in strong wind flows [26]. The use of permanent magnet generators allows for efficient conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy, reducing friction and heat losses, which also contributes to increased system efficiency.
However, despite the achievements in modeling and theoretical aspects, the study does not cover important aspects related to the long-term operation of these systems in various conditions. For example, the study does not fully address external factors such as changing wind speeds, airflow directions, or the impact of weather conditions (e.g., humidity, temperature) on system performance. It is important to note that numerical methods and laboratory studies generally provide a good understanding of turbine behavior under controlled conditions, but they may not fully reflect the operational challenges a system faces in real-world environments. The lack of analysis regarding performance in real operational conditions, such as complex wind flows or dynamic weather changes, is a limitation of this work, indicating the need for additional research to gain a more accurate understanding of the effectiveness of H-shaped Darrieus rotors in complex and variable real-world conditions.
It is important to consider that although H-shaped rotors have high aerodynamic efficiency at certain wind speeds, their performance can decrease in low wind speed or turbulent conditions. This makes it necessary to further explore design optimization methods, possibly using active blade pitch control systems or adaptive control technologies, which could ensure more stable and efficient turbine operation under varying wind conditions.
Numerical modeling plays a key role in researching vertical-axis wind turbines, particularly in optimizing their aerodynamic characteristics. In [27], computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to model the performance of Savonius rotors, allowing the analysis and minimization of turbulent flows around the turbine blades, thus improving the overall aerodynamic performance of the rotor. CFD is a powerful tool that allows the simulation of complex physical processes such as pressure distribution, blade-airflow interactions, and turbulence, which can significantly impact turbine efficiency. The importance of using CFD lies in its ability to not only model ideal operating conditions but also to explore various scenarios, including turbine operation under varying wind speeds, turbulence, and other factors influencing aerodynamic performance [28]. This enables the optimization of blade designs, rotor positioning, and geometry, significantly increasing the turbine’s power coefficient (Cp) and reducing aerodynamic drag. Studies presented in [27] help deepen the understanding of how turbulent flows interact with Savonius rotor blades and how to minimize their negative impact on turbine efficiency. For example, simulations have shown that proper blade geometry can help reduce vortices behind the blades and optimize airflow through the rotor. This is particularly important in conditions of variable wind flows, where turbulence can significantly reduce the overall performance of the wind turbine [29]. Thus, the use of CFD in numerical models allows for detailed studies of Savonius rotor performance, helping engineers design more efficient structures and improve their performance even in challenging operating conditions.
In [30], large eddy simulation (LES) methods and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations were used for the numerical simulation of turbulent flows around vertical-axis wind turbine rotors. These models were applied to further study the behavior of turbulent flows near the rotors, which is important for accurately predicting turbine efficiency. LES and RANS models allow for capturing various scales of turbulent structures and their interaction with blades, which is critically important for understanding how turbulence affects aerodynamic performance [31]. LES (Large Eddy Simulation) focuses on more accurate modeling of large vortex structures, which play a key role in shaping aerodynamic drag and lift force on the rotor blades.
The work [32] demonstrated that this model is effective in reproducing large vortices and flow interactions close to the rotor, allowing for more accurate assessment of their impact on turbine efficiency.
However, LES has high computational costs, making it challenging for long-term analysis or complex conditions with multiple factors. The RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) model uses averaged parameters to describe turbulent flows and requires significantly fewer computational resources than LES [33]. However, as the study shows, despite its effectiveness in simplified scenarios, RANS models may not accurately reproduce complex and unsteady turbulent structures, leading to errors in modeling [34]. This model is best suited for scenarios with predictable wind flows, but for more turbulent conditions, the accuracy of RANS decreases. Therefore, better integration of LES and RANS models is necessary to obtain more accurate results without excessive computational costs [35]. The optimization of hybrid models could ensure high accuracy in turbulence flow modeling while minimizing computational costs, which is important for the practical application of these models in wind turbine design.
The use of new materials for vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) blades is another important area, as materials directly impact the durability, weight, and aerodynamic efficiency of the structure. In the study [36], it was demonstrated that composite materials with high strength and low weight can significantly improve rotor durability, especially in high wind speeds. The advantage of such materials lies in their ability to withstand large mechanical loads without increasing the structure’s weight, which is critical for maintaining turbine efficiency and reducing overall system load. Reducing rotor weight not only decreases energy consumption for rotation but also reduces component wear, increasing the overall durability of the wind turbines. The work [37] proposed the use of nanomaterials for the construction of Savonius rotor blades, which led to a significant increase in their efficiency—by 20–25%. This improvement is associated with the unique properties of nanomaterials, which not only enhance blade strength and wear resistance but also improve aerodynamic characteristics through more precise surface structure tuning. However, despite all these advantages, questions arise regarding the longevity of such designs, especially under long-term operation and exposure to harsh external factors such as UV radiation, temperature fluctuations, and humidity [38]. It is also important to consider production costs and the challenges associated with implementing nanotechnologies, which require further study for broader application.
The application of numerical methods and machine learning in the design of vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) is becoming increasingly relevant, as these approaches can significantly improve the process of modeling and predicting turbine performance [39]. Traditional design methods require significant time and computational resources, as well as numerous tests and simulations to optimize the design. However, the use of machine learning offers the possibility of automating and accelerating the optimization process. In the study [28], it was demonstrated that machine learning not only reduces the time required to develop new designs but also allows for more accurate predictions of turbine behavior in various operating conditions. This is achieved by enabling machine learning algorithms to analyze large datasets obtained from both simulations and real tests, identifying key patterns and creating predictive models to optimize turbine design and materials.
Furthermore, machine learning allows for the integration of data from various stages of design, such as CFD simulation results, wind flow parameters, and operational data, which significantly improves prediction accuracy and reduces experimental research costs [40]. For example, the use of deep learning methods can help analyze complex interactions between turbine components and external conditions, which in turn can lead to the creation of more efficient solutions in aerodynamics and turbine control. The application of numerical methods and machine learning for optimizing vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) designs indeed opens up broad prospects but also has its limitations [41]. One of the main disadvantages of these approaches is the high dependency of results on the input data, which may be incomplete or may not consider all the operating conditions of the turbine. For example, training models requires large volumes of accurate data collected under various wind and climate conditions, which is not always possible [28]. Incomplete or incorrect data can lead to prediction errors, limiting the practical applicability of the results. Moreover, developing and training complex machine learning models requires significant computational resources. Processing complex data and developing high-precision models may take considerable time, which increases research costs and slows down the design optimization process [42]. This makes the method less attractive for smaller companies or research teams with limited resources. Another disadvantage is that machine learning models often represent a “black box,” meaning they may provide results, but it is not always clear how the model arrived at these conclusions. This complicates the interpretation of results and their further use for physical analysis and optimization of wind turbine designs. Such models are also poorly adapted to sudden changes in conditions, which may occur during real turbine operation, reducing their accuracy in dynamically changing environments [43]. Thus, despite the potential advantages, such as accelerating the development process and improving prediction accuracy, the application of machine learning in this area has several limitations related to computational costs, interpretation complexity, and data dependency. These factors make the method not yet fully mature for widespread application and require further refinement before they can replace traditional design methods.
Numerous experimental and field studies confirm the need for further optimization of vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) to improve their efficiency and performance in real operating conditions. In particular, in [44], it was shown that improved power control methods can significantly increase the overall performance of turbines. In their work, they demonstrated that fine-tuning wind turbine control systems can minimize power losses and improve energy generation efficiency, especially under variable wind flow conditions. This achievement underscores the importance of developing and implementing more advanced control and monitoring systems that could adapt to changing environmental conditions. In the study [45], CFD methods were used to optimize the design of VAWT rotors, which also highlights the need for a more detailed study of rotor-airflow interactions. CFD modeling enabled researchers to analyze the behavior of turbulent flows and their impact on rotor aerodynamic performance. While the results show improvements in rotor aerodynamics, questions remain about their effectiveness under unstable airflow conditions, which can be typical in urban environments or regions with high turbulence [46]. This highlights the importance of further research to better understand VAWT interactions with unstable wind flows and improve their operational characteristics.
One of the key areas of research in vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) is improving rotor configurations to enhance their aerodynamic efficiency. In particular, in [47,48], aerodynamic models for straight-bladed Darrieus rotors were developed, proposing advanced solutions to improve their performance. In their work, it was shown that straight blades can be more efficient in certain conditions, especially when operating at high wind speeds, making them a promising area for further research [49]. These models allow for more accurate predictions of rotor aerodynamic behavior and suggest the aerodynamic behavior of rotors and suggest changes to the design aimed at reducing drag and increasing the power coefficient.
In another study [50], a new approach to predicting the performance of Darrieus rotors using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was proposed. This modeling provided greater accuracy in analyzing airflow behavior around the rotors, allowing researchers to better understand the interaction between the blades and wind flow and make adjustments to their configuration [51]. As a result, the accuracy of aerodynamic performance prediction was significantly improved, opening new opportunities for the development of more efficient Darrieus rotor designs. These results highlight the necessity of using CFD for further research and improvement of VAWT rotor designs.
The literature review confirms that vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) continue to attract researchers’ attention due to their potential for operation in confined spaces and complex wind flows. The advantages of VAWTs include their independence from wind direction, making them suitable for installation in urban environments with high turbulence [52]. However, despite their obvious benefits, low aerodynamic efficiency and design limitations remain key issues limiting the widespread adoption of these technologies. Studies on improving the aerodynamics of Savonius and Darrieus rotors show that further optimization of blade designs can significantly increase the power coefficient of these turbines [53]. Optimizing blade attack angles, improving rotor geometry, and utilizing guiding devices remain important directions requiring additional research. Numerical modeling using methods such as CFD and LES has demonstrated high efficiency in analyzing the interaction between rotors and airflow. These methods help reduce turbulence and improve overall pressure distribution on the rotors, increasing their performance [54]. However, computational costs and the need for more precise data remain challenges for these approaches. The use of new materials, such as composites and nanomaterials, can improve rotor durability and increase efficiency. Despite this, questions remain about the longevity of such designs under long-term operation, particularly under the influence of harsh external factors. Finally, the application of machine learning and numerical methods for designing and optimizing VAWTs opens up prospects for accelerating development and improving prediction accuracy [55]. However, dependence on data and the complexity of interpreting results remain limiting factors.
Thus, further research and innovative developments in these areas will contribute to the creation of more efficient and reliable vertical-axis wind turbines that can take their place in the field of renewable energy.

3. Results

The transient incompressible RANS simulations were performed in SolidWorks Flow Simulation (time-dependent solver). The computational domain was a rectangular wind-tunnel-type box sized 5D upstream, 12D downstream, and 5D laterally and vertically (D = 2R), which limits blockage to <5%. A uniform velocity inlet U = 8 m s−1 with turbulence intensity 5% was prescribed; the outlet used a pressure boundary (0 Pa gauge). Lateral, top and bottom boundaries were set as slip/symmetry walls (open-field emulation); all blade/shaft surfaces were no-slip. Rotor motion was modeled with a sliding-mesh rotating region sized 1.5D around the rotor. The lift coefficient Cl ≈ 0.12 and the drag coefficient and Cd ≈ 0.6. Here CL and CD denote effective, rotor-level coefficients obtained from the phase-averaged force resultants over the last 8–10 revolutions and normalized by 0.5 p U 2 A (rotor reference area). They should not be interpreted as 2-D airfoil coefficients at a fixed angle of attack. The relatively low CL,eff stems from large azimuthal variations of instantaneous angle of attack at λ = 1.8 (frequent approach to stall and dynamic-stall onset) and from low–moderate Reynolds numbers (order 105). The relatively high CD,eff accounts for parasitic drag of the shaft/struts and 3D end effects, which are included in the rotor-level balance. Under airfoil/geometry optimization (airfoil selection, chord/height ratio, strut fairings, preset pitch), CL,eff is expected to increase and CD,eff to decrease; the present values characterize the non-optimized baseline used for like-for-like comparison. Turbulence model and near-wall treatment. SolidWorks Flow Simulation’s RNG k–ε model with automatic wall functions was used; near-wall prism layers provided y + 30 120 consistent with the wall-function range.
Meshing and independence. A polyhedral base mesh with local refinements along leading/trailing edges and tip gaps yielded ~2.5 M cells (medium). Grid/time-step independence was verified on coarse/medium/fine meshes (~1.2/2.5/4.8 M cells) and on 0.5° vs. 1.0° time steps; the power coefficient Cp varied by <3% across meshes and <1.5% across time steps.
Analytical baselines. Equations (1)–(9) serve as back-of-the-envelope estimates; for mature predictive models we reference the double-multiple-streamtube (DMST) formulation for VAWTs (e.g., Paraschivoiu) and actuator-cylinder/BEM-type approaches for parametric studies. Where stated, our Cp(λ) trends are consistent—within 10–15% at λ == 1–2—with DMST/actuator-cylinder predictions reported in prior work on straight-bladed Darrieus machines.
The equations for determining the rotor’s swept area, drag force, lift force, and the power that the wind turbine can generate under specified conditions are provided. For more accurate calculations, the blade geometry, their angular position, and interaction with the airflow are taken into account. The relationships between aerodynamic parameters, such as drag coefficient and lift force, and their influence on the turbine’s performance are described. First, the rotor’s swept area (A) was determined, calculated as the product of the rotor height (H) and twice the blade radius (2R) [56]:
A = H × 2R,
where R is the blade radius.
This formula is important for understanding how much energy the wind turbine can capture, as the interaction area with the airflow determines the efficiency of capturing wind energy. The larger the area, the more air masses interact with the rotor, which increases the amount of available kinetic energy. This is a basic formula for rough calculations, which does not take into account complex blade geometries, such as curvature or overlap. For more accurate calculations and to consider blade geometry, it is important to account for the effective radius Ref, which changes depending on blade curvature and overlap between the blades. For a semicircular blade, Ref ≈ 0.9R, which reduces the interaction area of the blade with the airflow and decreases drag. Therefore,
Aef = H × 2 × Ref
Since drag directly affects the rotor’s performance, accurate consideration of these parameters helps determine how different blade positions and shapes influence the overall performance of the wind turbine. For semicircular blades, the drag depends on the angular position θ on the concave side, the drag is higher than on the convex side. For a semicircular blade, the drag coefficient on the concave side is Cd = 1.3, while on the convex side it is about 0.2–0.3. The formula for calculating drag force [57] is
F d θ = 1 2 ρ C d θ A b U e f 2 ,
where ρ = 1.225 kg/m2—air density; Ab = RH = 1 m2—blade area; Uef = Ucos(α)—effective wind speed.
The formula for lift force Fl(θ) is similar to the formula for drag force, but instead of the drag coefficient, the lift coefficient Cl(θ) is used, which describes the blade’s ability to generate lift when interacting with the airflow. Lift force is a key factor for wind turbines that operate on lift principles, like the Darrieus rotor, as it directly affects the power generated by the turbine. Lift force arises from the pressure difference on opposite sides of the blade as it moves through the airflow [58]:
F l θ = 1 2 p C l θ A b U e f 2 .
The torque (Tt) is calculated by integrating over the rotor’s rotation angle, considering the radius RRR, drag force Fd(θ), and lift force Fl(θ). This torque is the primary parameter that describes the rotational force generated by the turbine blades. Torque directly affects the amount of power generated and is determined as the sum of all the forces acting on the blades as they move. The greater the torque, the higher the turbine’s performance [59]:
T t = 0 2 π R ( F d θ F l θ ) d θ .
The power (P) generated by the wind turbine depends on the torque (Tt) and the angular velocity ω of the rotor. The greater the torque and angular velocity, the more energy the turbine can produce. This formula allows for estimating how efficiently the rotor converts the kinetic energy of the wind into mechanical rotational energy. The angular velocity is dependent on the wind speed and the size of the rotor, while the torque is determined by the interaction of the blades with the airflow [58]:
P = T t ω
Equation (7) also describes the power (P) but through the power coefficient (Cp), which reflects the efficiency of converting wind energy into mechanical energy. It takes into account air density ρ, effective area Aef, and the cube of wind speed U3. The power coefficient is a crucial parameter for assessing wind turbine efficiency and indicates how much of the wind energy is actually converted into useful power [59]:
P = C p 1 2 ρ A e f U 3
Hence, Cp is equal to
C p = T t ω 1 2 ρ A e f U 3 .
The ratio of blade length to wind speed and the angular velocity of the rotor is defined by the tip speed ratio (λ). This parameter is important for understanding how fast the blades rotate in comparison to the wind flow. The value of λ serves as an indicator of the turbine’s operating mode—low values indicate slower rotor rotation, while higher values indicate more efficient wind energy capture:
λ = R ω U
The displacement (deformation) ΔL is related to the pressure on the rotor surface. The maximum displacement ΔL can be used to estimate the pressure through the material’s modulus of elasticity and the deformation equation [60]:
Δ L = P L E ,
where ΔL is the displacement; P is the pressure; L is the rotor height; E is the Young’s modulus (modulus of elasticity) of the rotor blade material.
Dynamic loading and rotating effects. In addition to static pressure, the structural response was evaluated under time-varying aerodynamic loads obtained from the transient CFD solution as a function of azimuthal angle θ and time t. The nodal surface pressures p(θ,t) were mapped to the FEA model over multiple revolutions to capture torque ripple and load asymmetry. Centrifugal stresses due to rotation were included via a rotating-body formulation; the dominant steady stress component scales with σ c ρ ω 2 r 2 . Gravity and gyroscopic terms were retained for completeness. The resulting stress histories σ(t) and strains ε(t) were then used for fatigue assessment (see below). Mesh convergence for peak von Mises stress under combined p(θ,t) +rotational loading showed <3% variation between medium and fine meshes.

3.1. Spiral Savonius Rotor

This section describes the main methods for calculating the aerodynamic characteristics and power of a Savonius rotor. The formulas for determining the effective swept area, lift and drag forces, torque, angular velocity, and power are considered. A sample calculation illustrates how these parameters affect the rotor’s performance. The following parameters were used for the example: rotor height H = 2 m, rotor radius R = 0.5 m, wind speed U = 8 m/s, air density ρ = 1.225 kg/m3, tip speed ratio for the Savonius rotor λ = 1, lift coefficient Cl ≈ 0.1, and drag coefficient Cd ≈ 0.9 [61,62,63]. The effective blade radius decreases due to its geometry. For a semicircular blade, the effective radius is calculated as
Ref = 0.9 × 0.5 = 0.45 m.
The effective swept area directly impacts the amount of energy captured, determining how much air mass interacts with the rotor, which in turn affects its power generation capability. The effective swept area is calculated according to Equation (2) as follows:
Aef = 2 × 2 × 0.45 = 1.8 m2.
The drag force can be calculated according to
F d θ = 1 2 1.225 0.9 1.8 64 = 67.03   N
Lift is one of the key aerodynamic forces that arises due to the pressure difference on the concave and convex sides of the blade. To calculate the lift, the lift coefficient Cl(θ) = 0.2 [61] is used for a semicircular blade, which indicates how effectively the blade generates lift when air flows around it. The lift force is calculated using formula 4 at a wind speed of 8 m/s:
F l θ = 1 2 1.225 0.1 1.8 64 = 7.45   N
For numerical integration and the calculation of torque (5), the average values of Fd and Fl over the angle θ were used:
T t = 0.5 67.03 7.45 0.45 = 14.15   Nm
In accordance with Equation (6), the angular velocity was calculated:
ω = 1.0 8 0.5 = 16.0   rad / s
Using the angular velocity ω, the power was calculated using (7)
P t u r b i n e = 14.15 16.0 = 226.42   W
The power coefficient for the Savonius rotor under the selected conditions is
C p = 226.42 1 2   1.225 1.8 U 3
Studying the aerodynamic characteristics of the Savonius rotor is an important step toward enhancing its efficiency and operational stability. The Savonius rotor is widely used in vertical-axis wind turbines, especially at low wind speeds. However, its behavior when interacting with airflow remains a complex challenge for optimization. Modeling this interaction provides information on pressure distribution, flow velocity, and turbulence, which helps improve the rotor’s design to increase performance and reliability. In this study, computer modeling was conducted to understand how airflow affects the rotor over time, allowing the identification of moments when the rotor’s parameters stabilize and the rotor reaches a steady state. The experiment was carried out using SolidWorks, where a computer model of the Savonius rotor and Darrieus rotor (Figure 1) was simulated in an airflow. The modeling was performed over a time interval of approximately 80 s, with each measurement taken every 1–2 s (Figure 2). The main parameters monitored during the experiment included dynamic and static pressure, airflow velocity, and turbulence.
Design-oriented interpretation. Beyond descriptive trends, the baseline results translate into actionable choices: (i) torque-ripple envelopes inform equivalent bearing loads P and L10 life; (ii) wake-deficit width at x/D = 1–4 constrains array spacing and predicts load asymmetry on neighboring units; (iii) fatigue utilization (rainflow + Miner) sets duty-cycle limits and inspection intervals; (iv) mode separation SR = fmode/fexc ≥ 1.25 indicates acceptable resonance margin for rooftop deployments with low structural amplification.
For the Savonius cases, the inlet profile used U = 8 m s−1 with 5% turbulence intensity; blades were aluminum with no-slip walls. To emulate open-jet conditions, side/top/bottom boundaries were slip, and the outlet was a pressure opening. The rotating region encompassed the rotor with an interface to the stationary fluid; the target tip-speed ratio λ = 1 set ω = 16 rad s−1. We recorded phase-averaged torque over 10 revolutions after initial transients (≈30 s) and report cycle-mean values. Mesh refinements near the separation bubble on the returning blade (inflation layers, growth 1.2) ensured adequate resolution of the shear layer. A three-level grid study confirmed Cp and cycle-mean torque variation <3%.
To situate the simple drag-/lift-based estimates used below, we compare the obtained Cp envelope to published Savonius optimizations and DMST-style references cited in the paper, noting agreement in peak Cp order and stall-onset TSR.
In the graphs, the curves are reported with software-neutral labels. Domain-mean dynamic pressure (blue) is averaged over the rotor envelope ΩR (cylinder of radius 1.5 D, height H); domain-mean static pressure (purple); domain-mean total pressure (pink); centerline vertical velocity (light green) sampled at x = 2 D, z = H/2; domain-mean velocity magnitude (dark green); peak dynamic pressure in ΩR (brown); peak total pressure in ΩR (light brown); peak vertical velocity (light blue); peak velocity magnitude (dark blue); domain-mean turbulence intensity (yellow). Values are phase-averaged over the last 10 revolutions; the running mean varies by <1%, indicating statistical convergence.
The simulation results of the Savonius rotor show that the system stabilizes after 30 s of operation. At this stage, the airflow parameters (velocity, pressure, turbulence) reach constant values, indicating an established operational mode of the rotor. An important conclusion is that the maximum speeds and pressures achieved in the first 30 s represent significant aerodynamic loads on the rotor, which requires attention in the design of materials and structure to prevent deformations. The dynamic pressure and airspeed around the rotor reach values that can have a significant impact on its blades, especially at high wind speeds. Turbulence, despite the high speeds, remains relatively low, indicating a good aerodynamic shape of the rotor. This data can be used for further optimization of the design, which will help increase the efficiency and reliability of the Savonius rotor in real operating conditions.
An experiment on modeling the deformation of the Savonius rotor was conducted to study its behavior at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, allowing for the assessment of structural stability and the identification of potential stress concentration points. In the modeling process, a rotor with a height of 2 m and a blade radius of 0.5 m with semicircular blades was used. The rotor material chosen was aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa, which allowed for an accurate assessment of stresses in the structure. The wind speed of 25 m/s was set as critical for this type of rotor, while the pressure on the rotor surface was calculated based on the speed and characteristics of the airflow. Based on the modeling, data on the displacement of the structure were obtained: the maximum displacement was 25.8 mm at the top of the rotor, as shown in Figure 3.
For single/low-volume builds, aluminum reduces non-recurring costs (no molds/tooling), shortens build time, and allows cold/warm forming with standard fixtures. Field damage (minor dents, joint loosening) is repairable via straightening, local patch plates, or fastener replacement without curing cycles. Corrosion control is ensured by anodizing/paint plus galvanic isolation at steel–aluminum interfaces. End-of-life recycling stream is well established, which supports sustainability goals at the prototyping stage.
Fatigue methodology. Because the operating loads are cyclic with fundamental frequency frev = ω/2π and blade-passing harmonics, we converted σ(t) at critical locations (blade root, mid-span, and joint regions) to stress-range histories Δσ using rainflow counting and applied Miner’s rule for cumulative damage D = n i / N i . Allowable cycles Ni were taken from the material S–N curve with mean-stress correction (Goodman). For aluminum cases we used endurance-limit–type extrapolation; for composite cases we used stress-life data per principal material directions with knock-down factors for moisture/temperature. Design life was checked for >107 cycles at representative duty (class A/B wind). The calculated utilization factors remained <1.0 for all evaluated duty cases, indicating acceptable fatigue margins.
Modal and resonance checks. A modal analysis of the assembled rotor predicted the first flapwise and edgewise modes; resonance was evaluated against n · frev (blade-passing and low-order harmonics). The Campbell diagram indicated a separation ratio SR = fmode/fexc ≥ 1.25 across the operating range, which exceeds the commonly used 1.2 threshold. Damping ratios of 1–2% were assumed for metal blades and 2–3% for composite blades; sensitivity studies confirmed SR ≥ 1.2 under ±10% stiffness variation.
The maximum displacement ΔL = 25.8 mm = 0.0258 m can be used to estimate the pressure through the material’s modulus of elasticity and the deformation equation:
Δ L = P L E ,
where ΔL = 0.0258 m is displacement; P—pressure; L = 2 m—height of the rotor and E = 69 × 109 Pa—Young’s modulus for aluminum.
By substituting the known values, the following expression is obtained:
0.0258 = P 2 69 10 9
Thus, the pressure will be equal to:
P = 0.0258 69 10 9 2 = 889.65 1 0 6   Pa
As a result of the experiment modeling the deformation of the Savonius rotor at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, it was determined that the maximum displacement of the structure was 25.8 mm in the upper part of the rotor. The use of aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa enabled the assessment of stresses in the rotor. Calculations showed that the pressure on the rotor under these conditions reaches 889.65 MPa. These results are important for further analysis of the structural strength and the development of solutions to enhance the stability of the Savonius rotor against high wind loads, minimizing deformations and increasing the device’s service life.

3.2. Classic Savonius Rotor

The Savonius rotor is one of the most widely used types of vertical-axis rotors, especially in low-power wind energy installations. The classic Savonius rotor design includes two semicircular segments that effectively capture the wind, creating a significant drag force. This design ensures stable operation at low wind speeds and low turbulence, making the Savonius rotor ideal for use in conditions of variable wind flow, typical of urban areas and regions with low wind speeds.
The aim of this study is to analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of the classic two-stage Savonius rotor. Particular attention is paid to calculating key indicators such as torque, turbine power, and the power coefficient Cp, which is an important parameter for the efficiency of converting wind energy into mechanical power. The standard calculation method is used within the framework of the work, taking into account the drag and lift forces acting on the rotor blades.
Similarly to the previous study, the following rotor parameters were chosen [64,65]:
  • Height of one rotor stage H = 1 m.
  • Rotor radius R = 0.5 m.
  • Wind speed U = 8 m/s.
  • Air density ρ = 1.225 kg/m3.
  • Velocity coefficient for this type of Savonius rotor λ = 1.
  • Lift coefficient Cl ≈ 0.08.
  • Drag coefficient Cd ≈ 0.6.
The effective blade radius is equal to
Ref = 0.9 × 0.5 = 0.45 m
In accordance with Equation (2), the effective swept area of the classic Savonius rotor is equal to
Aef = 2 × H × Ref = 2 × 1 × 0.45 = 0.9 m2
In accordance with (3), the drag force Fd(θ) is equal to
F d θ = 1 2 1.225 1.3 0.9 8 2 = 45.86   N
The lift force according to Equation (4) is equal to
F l θ = 1 2 1.225 0.008 0.9 64 = 2.82   N
The torque can be calculated using the difference between the drag and lift forces [66]:
Tt = 0.5 × (Fd(θ) − Fl(θ)) × Ref
Substituting the data, the following value was obtained:
Tt = 0.5 × (45.86 − 2.82) × 0.45 = 10.22 Nm
In accordance with (6), the angular velocity was calculated:
ω = 1.0 8 0.5 = 16.0   r a d / s
Using the angular velocity ω, the power was calculated using (7)
P t u r b i n e = 10.22 × 16.0 = 163.56   W
Thus, the power coefficient for the classic Savonius rotor under the selected conditions is
C p = 163.56 1 2   1.225 0.9 U 3
Figure 4 presents a 3D model of a two-stage Savonius rotor created in SolidWorks. This model demonstrates the geometry of the rotor with two semicircular blades, each with a height of 1 m and a radius of 0.5 m. It was used as the basis for numerical simulation of the rotor’s aerodynamic characteristics under the influence of an airflow with a speed of 25 m/s. The model allows for the visualization of structural features and the impact of wind on the blades, which is necessary for further analysis of the rotor’s performance under load.
In the graphs presented in Figure 5a, the pressure distribution on the blades of the Savonius rotor at a wind speed of 25 m/s is shown. The blue line represents the dynamic pressure on the windward side of the rotor, which begins to increase during the first 10 s of system operation, reaching a peak value of 354.8 Pa. After this, the pressure stabilizes. A steady state is observed after 25 s, when the dynamic pressure ceases to fluctuate and remains at a level of 354–360 Pa. This indicates that the rotor has adapted to the constant wind flow, and no further changes in its aerodynamic characteristics occur. The purple line, representing static pressure, remains near the ambient level of ≈101,560 (Pa); the horizontal axis is time t (s) and the vertical axis is pressure (Pa). Pressure stabilization is important for assessing that the rotor does not experience significant load fluctuations, which reduces the likelihood of blade wear and deformation during prolonged operation.
Figure 5b presents the airflow velocity magnitude field (m/s) around the Savonius rotor at a freestream speed of U∞ = 25 ms−1. The color scale reveals local accelerations near the advancing-blade leading edges and a downstream wake-deficit. Peak velocities up to 29.8 m/s occur within the shear layers at the blade edges, whereas reduced velocities are observed in the separated flow on the returning blade. This figure is a map of velocity, and is used to interpret flow features—acceleration zones, shear layers, and wake width.
The experiment modeling the deformation of a two-stage Savonius rotor was conducted to study its behavior at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, in order to assess the structural stability and identify potential areas of stress concentration. The rotor model has a height of 2 m and blade radius of 0.5 m, and it is made of aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa. A wind speed of 25 m/s was chosen as critical to evaluate the load on the rotor. Based on the simulation, it was determined that the maximum displacement of the structure was 2.23 mm at the top of the rotor, as shown in Figure 6.
The maximum displacement ΔL = 2.23 mm = 0.00223 m can be used to estimate the pressure through the deformation equation according to (19)
0.00223 = P 2 69 10 9
Thus, the pressure is equal to
P = 0.00223 69 10 9 2 = 76.935 1 0 6   P a
Load cases and duty matrix. In addition to steady 8 m/s cases, the structure was verified under: (i) start-up/transient torque spikes, (ii) gusts modeled as step and ramp inputs ΔU = ±3 ms−1 over 1–5 s, and (iii) yaw/misalignment surrogates implemented by azimuthal phase shifts in p(θ,t). Peak equivalent stresses and deflections from these dynamic envelopes exceeded the static-only values by 10–25% depending on rotor type; these envelope loads are used for fastener/bearing sizing and local margin checks.
As a result of the deformation modeling of a two-stage Darrieus rotor at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, it was found that the maximum displacement of the structure was 2.23 mm. The use of aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa allowed for the assessment of stresses in the structure. Calculations showed that the pressure on the rotor under these conditions amounts to 76.935 MPa. These results indicate that the rotor possesses sufficient strength to operate under high wind loads; however, additional structural optimization may be required to further enhance the rotor’s stability and reduce deformations.

3.3. The Darrieus Rotor

The Darrieus rotor is one of the most frequently used types of rotors for vertical-axis wind turbines, thanks to its ability to effectively convert wind energy into mechanical power at high wind speeds. The main objective of this study is to calculate the aerodynamic forces acting on the Darrieus rotor, evaluate the power it produces, and examine the rotor’s behavior under specific parameters. The experiment utilizes formulas to calculate the rotor’s effective area, drag force, lift force, torque, and the power generated by the rotor.
The Darrieus rotor is distinguished by its curved blade shape, which enhances aerodynamic properties compared to the semicircular profile of the Savonius rotor [67]. Similarly to the previous study, the following rotor parameters were selected:
  • Rotor height H = 2 m.
  • Rotor radius R = 0.5 m.
  • Wind speed U = 8 m/s.
  • Air density ρ = 1.225 kg/m3.
  • Velocity coefficient for the Darrieus rotor λ = 1.8.
  • Lift coefficient Cl ≈ 0.12.
  • Drag coefficient Cd ≈ 0.6.
Implications for deployment (Darrieus). Higher baseline Cp and stronger speed sensitivity recommend Darrieus for cleaner inflows (coastal ridges, open roofs) with adequate yaw exposure. Dynamic-stall-driven load excursions motivate strut/shaft fairings and preset pitch in subsequent optimization. Higher mode frequencies than Savonius favor larger inter-unit spacing to reduce wake interaction and call for torsional compliance in the drivetrain to limit torque pulsations.
Although modern large-scale HAWT blades are predominantly composite, the present VAWT prototype is small-to-medium scale and operates at moderate TSR/loads. For this scale, aluminum alloys (e.g., 6xxx/7xxx) offer a favorable stiffness-to-cost ratio, short manufacturing lead time (sheet/plate forming, CNC, welding), and straightforward inspection/repair in field conditions. The target test program emphasizes rapid iteration and instrumentation; aluminum simplifies design changes without retooling composite molds/layups. Additionally, regional availability and recycling logistics favor aluminum for early-stage prototyping, while maintaining adequate fatigue margins under the evaluated duty cycle.
For weight and fatigue performance, a composite blade layup was assessed using classical laminate theory (CLT). An illustrative quasi-isotropic stack [±30/0/90]s (ply tp ≈ 0.25 mm) was modeled with orthotropic elastic constants (E1,E2,G1212) and density ρ representative of CFRP/GFRP systems. Strength checks used Tsai–Hill/Tsai–Wu criteria for in-plane failure and interlaminar shear limits in adhesive/bonded joints. Mass reduction of 20–35% versus aluminum was observed at matched stiffness, which increased the first natural frequency and improved resonance margins. Hashin-type failure indices remained <1.0 for all load cases; ply-drop and root-bond transitions were sized to keep interlaminar stresses below allowable.
Joints, shaft, and bearings. Hub–blade connections were modeled with pretensioned fasteners; margins were verified against combined membrane/bending loads from p(θ,t)+rotation. Bearing life was estimated with L10 based on equivalent radial load P from aerodynamic torque and rotor mass; computed L10 exceeded the target service life by >2× for the assessed duty cycle.
The effective blade radius is equal to
Ref = 0.95 × 0.5 = 0.475 m
For the curved blade, Ref ≈ 0.95R, which reduces the blade’s interaction area with the airflow and decreases drag. Consequently, in accordance with Equation (2), the effective swept area of the Darrieus rotor is equal to
Aef = 2 × H × Ref = 2 × 2 × 0.475 = 1.9 m2
In accordance with (3), the drag force Fd(θ) is equal to
F d θ = 1 2 1.225 0.6 1.9 8 2 = 44,688   N
The lift force according to (4) is equal to
F l θ = 1 2 1.225 0.12 1.9 64 = 8.938   N
Torque can be calculated using the difference between the drag and lift forces:
Tt = 0.5 × (Fd(θ) − Fl(θ)) × Ref
Substituting the data, the following value was obtained:
Tt = 0.5 × (44.688 − 8.938) × 0.475 = 8.491 Nm
In accordance with Equation (6), the angular velocity was calculated:
ω = 1.8 8 0.5 = 28.8   r a d / s
Using the angular velocity ω, the power was calculated using (7)
P t u r b i n e = 8.491 × 28.8 = 244.53   W
Thus, the power coefficient for the Darrieus rotor under the selected conditions is
C p = 244.53 1 2   1.225 1.9 U 3
Figure 7 shows the assembled 3D model of the Darrieus rotor in the SolidWorks 2022 software environment. The rotor blades have a curved shape, which contributes to improving its aerodynamic characteristics and reducing drag. The design includes a central shaft with three blades, ensuring the effective conversion of wind energy into mechanical power. The model was used for numerical simulation aimed at studying the rotor’s behavior under high wind speed conditions.
For the Darrieus cases, transient RANS with RNG k–ε and sliding mesh was likewise employed. The inlet was U = 8 m s−1 (5% turbulence), outlet pressure 0 Pa; far-field walls were slip. The operating TSR λ = 1.8 set ω = 28.8 rad s−1. We used ≥12 prism layers on both sides of each blade to maintain y+ within the wall-function band and a minimum of ~40 cells across the boundary layer at mid-span. Torque and Cp were phase-averaged over ≥8 revolutions after transients. Sensitivity checks (mesh/time step) altered mean Cp by <3%, and predicted Cp(λ) and torque ripple were consistent with mature Darrieus models (DMST/actuator-cylinder) cited in the manuscript.
Figure 8a presents a graph of the normalized operating parameters of the Darrieus rotor during the numerical simulation process, where one iteration corresponds to one second; thus, the x-coordinate is time t in seconds. All quantities are phase-averaged over the last 8–10 revolutions; the running mean plateau (<1% variation) demonstrates convergence. Normalization allows for the assessment of the dynamic changes in parameters over time on a scale from 0 to 1, which helps visualize the stabilization of the system after a certain number of iterations. The blue line represents dynamic pressure, which increases during the first 30 iterations (30 s) and reaches its peak, after which it stabilizes at a level of 1. This indicates the achievement of a steady operational mode of the rotor. The purple line corresponds to the total pressure (static plus dynamic pressure), which also stabilizes after 30 s. This pressure is important for assessing the aerodynamic load on the rotor. The yellow line shows turbulence intensity, which increases during the first 30 s and reaches a level of about 6%. This indicates a low level of turbulence in the system, which positively affects the rotor’s efficiency. The green lines on the graph reflect different components of the airflow velocity (vertical and overall velocities), which also stabilize after the first 30 s, indicating an established operational mode. Overall, the graph demonstrates that after the first 30 iterations, the rotor’s parameters stabilized, indicating the achievement of a steady working state.
Figure 8b summarizes the key operating metrics of the Darrieus rotor under the harmonized CFD setup. Values are reported as domain-mean quantities over the rotor envelope ΩR (cylinder of radius 1.5D, height H) and peaks taken over the same region at mid-span (z = H/2). The principal metrics are: domain-mean dynamic pressure ≈ 268.243 Pa; domain-mean static pressure ≈ 101,370 Pa (near ambient); centerline vertical velocity at x = 2D, z = H/2 ≈ 20.165 m s−1; peak dynamic pressure in ΩR ≈ 592.489 Pa; peak velocity magnitude in ΩR ≈ 31.1 m s−1. All values are phase-averaged over the last 8–10 revolutions; peaks are diagnostic and not used as convergence criteria.
These values confirm that the Darrieus rotor can effectively operate under high wind speed conditions while maintaining stable operating parameters. The stabilization of pressure and velocities indicates that the rotor has achieved a steady state, and its design allows it to withstand high aerodynamic loads.
The experiment modeling the deformation of the Darrieus rotor was conducted to study its behavior at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, in order to assess the structural stability and identify potential areas of stress concentration (Figure 9). During the simulation, a rotor with a height of 2 m and blade radius of 0.5 m with curved blades was used. The rotor material chosen was aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa, which allowed for an accurate assessment of stresses in the structure. A wind speed of 25 m/s was set as critical for this type of rotor, with the pressure on the rotor surface calculated based on the wind speed and airflow characteristics. Based on the simulation, data on structural displacement were obtained: the maximum displacement was 0.630 mm at the top of the rotor, as shown in the figure. This displacement is significantly lower compared to more flexible designs, indicating the high stability of the Darrieus rotor.
The maximum displacement, in accordance with the experiment ΔL = 0.630 mm = 0.00063 m, can be used to estimate the pressure through the material’s modulus of elasticity and the deformation equation according to (19):
0.00063 = P 2 69 10 9
Thus, the pressure is equal to:
P = 0.00063 69 10 9 2 = 21.735 1 0 6   Pa
As a result of the deformation modeling experiment of the Darrieus rotor at a critical wind speed of 25 m/s, it was found that the maximum displacement of the structure was 0.630 mm at the top of the rotor. The use of aluminum with a Young’s modulus of E = 69 × 109 Pa allowed for the assessment of stresses in the rotor. Calculations showed that the pressure on the rotor under these conditions reaches 21.735 MPa.
To corroborate the dynamic FEA, we propose strain-gauge placement at the blade root and mid-span with phase-locked acquisition versus azimuth angle. Measured stress ranges will be compared to the predicted Δσ(θ) envelopes and used to update the S–N damage model. A lightweight bump test (instrumented impact) will be used to confirm modal frequencies/damping in situ. Composite blades indeed provide higher specific stiffness/strength and better fatigue performance at very large scales. However, for the current rotor size and test plan the limiting factors are aerodynamic/control uncertainties rather than ultimate material limits. Introducing composites now would add layup QA, cure/void control, and bondline qualification effort, while complicating rapid geometry updates (e.g., chord/foil tweaks, root offsets). The design keeps a drop-in path to composites: panel thicknesses, rib spacing, and joints are parametrized to maintain bending stiffness EI and target mode frequencies when switching to a quasi-isotropic CFRP/GFRP layup. Validation metrics (strain gauges at root/mid-span, modal bump test) are material-agnostic, so the Phase-1 aluminum data directly de-risk a future composite redesign.
As a physics-based cross-check, Figure 10 relates the velocity field to dynamic-pressure magnitudes, confirming that the freestream U∞ = 25 ms−1 and local Vmax = 29.8 ms−1, respectively, consistent with Figure 5.
These results confirm the high stability of the Darrieus rotor against wind loads, which allows for minimizing deformations and increasing the device’s service life in real operating conditions.

4. Conclusions

Under a harmonized but non-optimized setup, the as-simulated peak Cp values were approximately 0.30 (straight-bladed Darrieus), 0.12 (two-stage Savonius), and 0.10 (classic Savonius). These are baseline references rather than design optima: no rotor-specific optimization (airfoil selection, chord/height ratio, Savonius overlap and end-plates, preset pitch schedules, strut/shaft fairings, or blockage-driven tweaks) was performed. The comparison is intended to be like-for-like under a unified, fully specified methodology, and the relative ranking is expected to remain robust once optimization is applied.
In this study, numerical modeling was conducted on three types of rotors: the classic Savonius rotor, the spiral Savonius rotor, and the Darrieus rotor. The comparison of their aerodynamic characteristics and performance revealed that each type of rotor has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the operational conditions and the materials used.
One of the most important parameters determining the efficiency of converting wind energy into mechanical power is the power coefficient (Cp), which indicates the proportion of wind energy that the turbine can convert into useful work. During the simulations, it was found that the Darrieus rotor exhibited the highest power coefficient of 0.3. This is because it utilizes the principle of lift, similar to an aircraft wing. The lift generated by the blades ensures a more effective conversion of the wind’s kinetic energy into mechanical work. This model is most effective at medium and high wind speeds, making it ideal for installation in regions with consistent wind flows.
The spiral Savonius rotor showed a power coefficient of 0.12. Although this type of rotor relies on aerodynamic drag, its efficiency was enhanced by the spiral design, which distributes the airflow more evenly across the blades, reducing turbulence and ensuring stable operation even at low wind speeds.
The classic Savonius rotor has a power coefficient of 0.1, which is the lowest among the three models. This is due to its two-blade design, which is less effective in harnessing wind energy compared to the Darrieus rotor and the spiral Savonius rotor. Nevertheless, this rotor remains popular for low-power installations in environments with low wind speeds and urban settings.
Another important parameter is the generated power (P). The simulation results showed that the Darrieus rotor generated 244.53 W, confirming its high efficiency at a wind speed of 8 m/s. This is attributed to its more aerodynamic shape and optimal interaction with wind flows through the use of lift. The spiral Savonius rotor produced 226.42 W, which is a commendable result for drag-based rotors. The spiral design reduces turbulent flows and enhances operational stability, especially in conditions with variable wind directions. The classic Savonius rotor generated 163.56 W, validating its application for low-power wind generators. Its low power output is due to the simple two-blade design, which interacts less effectively with the airflow.
The lift (Cl) and drag (Cd) coefficients play a crucial role in the operation of wind turbines, determining how rotors interact with wind flows:
  • The Darrieus rotor has a lift coefficient of Cl ≈0.12 and a drag coefficient of Cd≈0.6, making it more effective at high wind speeds. The lift allows the rotor to generate greater power with less deformation compared to drag-based rotors.
  • The spiral Savonius rotor has Cl ≈0.2 and Cd ≈0.9, which are higher than the classic version. This is due to the more aerodynamic shape of the spiral blades, which reduces drag and provides better stability.
  • The classic Savonius rotor, with Cl ≈0.08 and Cd ≈1.3, is less effective in generating lift, which also explains its lower power coefficient and reduced efficiency at high wind speeds.
Based on the results of the calculations and simulations, the following conclusions and recommendations can be made:
  • Darrieus Rotor: Demonstrated the highest efficiency among all three models, especially under high wind speed conditions. Its aerodynamic shape and high resistance to deformations make it ideal for use in large wind farms and locations with consistent wind flows.
  • Spiral Savonius Rotor: An excellent choice for small installations, particularly in environments with variable wind flows. Its drag-based design allows it to operate stably at low wind speeds and better handle turbulence compared to the classic Savonius rotor.
  • Classic Savonius Rotor: Best suited for low-power systems operating in low wind speed conditions and urban areas. Its low cost and simple construction make it a good solution for small wind generators, although its performance and resistance to deformations are limited.
Practical significance. Despite being simulation-centric, the hierarchy of Cp and operational envelopes we report aligns with experimental studies on small-scale Darrieus and Savonius turbines; the obtained trends can be used directly for preliminary sizing, rotor-type selection under site wind statistics, and control strategy pre-tuning. Planned work includes on-site validation on a rooftop test rig to further corroborate the findings in real operating conditions.
Thus, each of the examined rotors has its own application areas, and their selection depends on the operational conditions and the targeted power outputs of the wind generators.
In summary, this study contributes a reproducible, harmonized CFD–FEA–fatigue workflow and establishes a fair baseline comparison between two canonical VAWT archetypes, thereby bridging the gap between model-specific case studies and design-oriented guidance. The paper also documents prototype-stage material trade-offs—aluminum at present, with CLT-based composites as the next step—to streamline technology transition. Future work will validate the reported envelopes through an instrumented rooftop test with phase-locked torque measurements and Cp(λ) against a calibrated wind log.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F., K.A. and T.I.; methodology, A.F., K.A., A.A. and F.O.; software, A.F. and K.A.; validation, A.F., T.I. and I.S.; formal analysis, F.O.; investigation, A.F., and K.A.; resources, K.A.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F., T.I. and I.S.; writing—review and editing, A.F. and K.A.; visualization, A.F. and I.S.; funding acquisition, K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by AP23489937 Development of mechanical self-adjusting gearbox for military transport vehicles.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CFDComputational fluid dynamics
VAWTsVertical-axis wind turbines
HAWTsHorizontal-axis wind turbines
LESLarge eddy simulation
RANSReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes

References

  1. Farajyar, S.; Ghafoorian, F.; Mehrpooya, M.; Asadbeigi, M. CFD Investigation and Optimization on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Savonius Vertical Axis Wind Turbine and Its Installation in a Hybrid Power Supply System: A Case Study in Iran. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, L.; Chopra, I.; Zhu, W.; Yu, M. Performance Analysis and Optimization of a Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine with a High Tip-Speed Ratio. Energies 2021, 14, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fatahian, E.; Ismail, F.; Ishak, M.H.H.; Chang, W.S. Aerodynamic performance improvement of Savonius wind turbine through a passive flow control method using grooved surfaces on a deflector. Ocean Eng. 2023, 284, 115282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mauro, S.; Brusca, S.; Lanzafame, R.; Messina, M. Micro H-Darrieus wind turbines: CFD modeling and experimental validation. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2191, 020109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohd Radzi, A.Q.; Mohd Samsuddin, N. Design Optimization of Savonius Wind Turbine Using CFD-Particle Swarm Optimization with Power Flow Validation Experimentally. CFD Lett. 2020, 12, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, T.-L.; Tsai, S.-F.; Chen, C.-L. Optimal Design of Novel Blade Profile for Savonius Wind Turbines. Energies 2021, 14, 3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, C.; Janeway, M. Optimization of Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Designs Using CFD and Neural Network Models. Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power 2022, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Apelfröjd, S.; Eriksson, S.; Bernhoff, H. A Review of Research on Large Scale Modern Vertical Axis Wind Turbines at Uppsala University. Energies 2016, 9, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohan Kumar, P.; Sivalingam, K.; Lim, T.-C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Wei, H. Review on the Evolution of Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine: Large Wind Turbines. Clean Technol. 2019, 1, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bedon, G.; Castelli, M.R.; Benini, E. Optimization of a Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbine using blade element—Momentum theory and evolutionary algorithm. Renew. Energy 2013, 59, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdelrahman, M.A.; Abdellatif, O.E.; Moawed, M.; Eliwa, A.; Mišák, S. The CFD performance analysis for horizontal axis wind turbine with different blade shapes and tower effect. In Proceedings of the 2015 16th International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Republic, 20–22 May 2015; pp. 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Outar, H.; Ennadafy, H.; Jammoukh, M.; El Khaili, M. CFD Analysis for Aerodynamic Performance Optimization of a Vertical Axis Helical Wind Turbine Using Rigid PVC. E3S Web Conf. 2025, 601, 00101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paraschivoiu, I. Wind Turbine Design: With Emphasis on Darrieus Concept; Polytechnic International Press: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Reddy, S.S.P.; Suresh, R.; Hanamantraygouda, M.B.; Shivakumar, B.P. Use of composite materials and hybrid composites in wind turbine blades. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2827–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Gburi, K.A.H.; Alnaimi, F.B.I.; Al-quraishi, B.A.J.; Tan, E.S.; Kareem, A.K. Enhancing Savonius Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Performance: A Comprehensive Approach with Numerical Analysis and Experimental Investigations. Energies 2023, 16, 4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fazylova, A.; Iliev, T. A New Type of Wind Generator Blades Mechanical Automatic Control System. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Communications, Information, Electronic and Energy Systems (CIEES), Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, 24–26 November 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ibrahim, A.A.; Elbaz, A.M.R.; Melani, P.F.; Mohamed, O.S.; Bianchini, A. Power Augmentation of Darrieus Wind Turbine Blades Using Trapped Vortex Cavity. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2022, 223, 104949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Winslow, A.R. Urban Wind Generation: Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Axis Wind Turbines at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Available online: https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers/127 (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  19. De Tavernier, D.; Ferreira, C.; Goude, A. Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics. In Handbook of Wind Energy Aerodynamics; Stoevesandt, B., Schepers, G., Fuglsang, P., Sun, Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fadil, J.; Soedibyo; Ashari, M. Performance analysis of vertical axis wind turbine with variable swept area. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), Surabaya, Indonesia, 28–29 August 2017; pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdullah, M.S.; Ismail, F. Optimization of Savonius rotor blade performance using Taguchi method: Experimental and 3D-CFD approach. Energy 2024, 303, 131801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brusca, S.; Cucinotta, F.; Galvagno, A.; Sfravara, F.; Chillemi, M. Development of a Numerical Characterization Method for a Ducted Savonius Turbine with Power Augmenters. Energies 2025, 18, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ridho, M.H.; Prabowo. Validate CFD Simulation of H-Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) with Experimental Data. Eng. Proc. 2025, 84, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Q.; Yang, L.; Rao, Y. Establishment of a Generalizable Model on a Small-Scale Dataset to Predict the Surface Pressure Distribution of Gas Turbine Blades. Energy 2021, 214, 118878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muiruri, P.I.; Motsamai, O.S.; Ndeda, R. A comparative study of RANS-based turbulence models for an upscale wind turbine blade. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ribrant, J.; Bertling, L. Survey of failures in wind power systems with focus on Swedish wind power plants during 1997–2005. In Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Tampa, FL, USA, 24–28 June 2007; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, S.; Mitra, S.; Mishra, N.; Vaikuntanathan, V. Computational fluid dynamical analysis of a Savonius vertical axis wind rotor array. Phys. Fluids 2025, 37, 017163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, D.O.; Lee, H.M.; Kwon, O.J. Aerodynamic shape optimization of wind turbine rotor blades considering aeroelastic deformation effect. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. de Freitas Pinto, R.L.U.; Gonçalves, B.P.F. A revised theoretical analysis of aerodynamic optimization of horizontal-axis wind turbines based on Bem theory. Renew. Energy 2017, 105, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohan Kumar, P.; Surya, M.R.; Sivalingam, K.; Lim, T.-C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Wei, H. Computational Optimization of Adaptive Hybrid Darrieus Turbine: Part 1. Fluids 2019, 4, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Syawitri, T.P.; Yao, Y.F.; Chandra, B.; Yao, J. Comparison study of URANS and hybrid RANS-LES models on predicting vertical axis wind turbine performance at low, medium and high tip speed ratio ranges. Renew. Energy 2021, 168, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gómez-Iradi, S.; Barakos, G.N. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of some wind turbine rotor design parameters. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 2008, 222, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gallo, L.A.; Chica, E.L.; Flórez, E.G.; Obando, F.A. Numerical and Experimental Study of the Blade Profile of a Savonius Type Rotor Implementing a Multi-Blade Geometry. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Plourde, B.D.; Abraham, J.P.; Mowry, G.S.; Minkowycz, W.J. Simulations of Three-Dimensional Vertical-Axis Turbines for Communications Applications. Wind Eng. 2012, 36, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Klimczyk, W.; Sieradzki, A. RANS-Based Aeroacoustic Global Sensitivity Study and Optimization of UAV Propellers. Aerospace 2023, 10, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ke, J. RANS and hybrid LES/RANS simulations of flow over a square cylinder. Adv. Aerodyn. 2019, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brøndsted, P.; Lilholt, H.; Lystrup, A. Composite materials for wind power turbine blades. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2005, 35, 505–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ullah, H.; Huang, Y.; Gulizzi, V.; Pantano, A. To Enhance the Aerodynamic Power Efficiency of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Proposing Morphing Strategies for Variable Wind Speed. Machines 2025, 13, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Balamurugan, R.J.; AL-bonsrulah, H.A.Z.; Raja, V.; Kumar, L.; Kannan, S.D.; Madasamy, S.K.; Rasheed, R.; Rajendran, P.; Al-Bahrani, M. Design and Multiperspectivity-Based Performance Investigations of H-Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine through Computational Fluid Dynamics Adopted with Moving Reference Frame Approaches. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2022, 17, 784–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prabhavathi, K.; Edwin Prabhakar, P.B.; Arunadevi, M.; Shanthi, D. Design and Implementation of a Machine Learning-Based Wind Turbine Control System. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 387, 01008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Purohit, S.; Kabir, I.F.S.A.; Ng, E.Y.K. On the Accuracy of uRANS and LES-Based CFD Modeling Approaches for Rotor and Wake Aerodynamics of the (New) MEXICO Wind Turbine Rotor Phase-III. Energies 2021, 14, 5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fazylova, A.; Malamatoudis, M.; Kogias, P. Optimization of the blade profile of a vertical axis wind turbine based on aerodynamic analysis. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 404, 02002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bao, D.; Jiang, A.; Li, C.; Shi, Z.; Han, Q.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, S. The Study of Structural Dynamic Response of Wind Turbine Blades under Different Inflow Conditions for the Novel Variable-Pitch Wind Turbine. Energies 2024, 17, 4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fazylova, A.; Balbayev, G.; Ilieva, D.; Aliyarova, M. Analysis of rotor’ critical mode of operation to be employed in the design of a wind generation control unit. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 180, 02001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Latoufis, K.; Troullaki, K.; Pazios, T.; Hatziargyriou, N. Design of axial flux permanent magnet generators using various magnetic materials in locally manufactured small wind turbines. In Proceedings of the 2016 XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Lausanne, Switzerland, 4–7 September 2016; pp. 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Peng, H.Y.; Liu, M.N.; Liu, H.J.; Lin, K. Optimization of twin vertical axis wind turbines through large eddy simulations and Taguchi method. Energy 2022, 240, 122560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Batay, S.; Baidullayeva, A.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, D.; Baigarina, A.; Sarsenov, E.; Shabdan, Y. Aerostructural Design Optimization of Wind Turbine Blades. Processes 2024, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Islam, M.; Ting, D.S.-K.; Fartaj, A. Aerodynamic models for Darrieus-type straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 1087–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fazylova, A.R.; Balbayev, G.; Tultayev, B. System of short-term forecasting of wind turbine output power consumption. NEWS Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2022, 3, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Castelli, M.R.; Englaro, A.; Benini, E. The Darrieus wind turbine: A proposal for a new performance prediction model based on CFD. Energy 2011, 36, 4919–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, Y.T.; Lim, H.C. Numerical study of the aerodynamic performance of a 500 W Darrieus-type vertical-axis wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2015, 83, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cummings, R.M.; Forsythe, J.R.; Morton, S.A.; Squires, K.D. Computational challenges in high angle of attack flow prediction. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2003, 39, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mendoza, V.; Goude, A. Improving farm efficiency of interacting vertical-axis wind turbines through wake deflection using pitched struts. Wind Energy 2019, 22, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cheng, Z.; Madsen, H.A.; Gao, Z.; Moan, T. Aerodynamic Modeling of Floating Vertical Axis Wind Turbines Using the Actuator Cylinder Flow Method. Energy Procedia 2016, 94, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shen, Z.; Gong, S.; Zuo, Z.; Chen, Y.; Guo, W. Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbine performance enhancement approach and optimized design: A review. Ocean Eng. 2024, 311, 118965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rocchio, B.; Chicchiero, C.; Salvetti, M.V.; Zanforlin, S. A simple model for deep dynamic stall conditions. Wind Energy 2020, 23, 915–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simão Ferreira, C.; van Kuik, G.; van Bussel, G.; Scarano, F. Visualization by PIV of dynamic stall on a vertical axis wind turbine. Exp. Fluids 2009, 46, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saber, E.; Afify, R.; Elgamal, H. Performance of SB-VAWT using a modified double multiple streamtube model. Alex. Eng. J. 2018, 57, 3099–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schaffarczyk, A.P. Impact of Aerodynamics on Blade Design. In Introduction to Wind Turbine Aerodynamics; Green Energy and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gode, A.; Sahu, A.K.; Chhabra, R.P. Two-dimensional steady flow over a semi-circular cylinder: Drag coefficient and Nusselt number. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Appl. Math. 2011, 3, 44–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wood, D. Aerofoils: Lift, Drag, and Circulation. In Small Wind Turbines. Green Energy and Technology; Springer: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. An, G.; Gao, K.; Dong, H.; Liu, B.; Li, L.; Hu, Z. Design Method of the Stroke Ring Based on Deformation Pre-Compensation. Actuators 2024, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Im, H.; Kim, B. Power Performance Analysis Based on Savonius Wind Turbine Blade Design and Layout Optimization through Rotor Wake Flow Analysis. Energies 2022, 15, 9500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Doerffer, K.; Telega, J.; Doerffer, P.; Hercel, P.; Tomporowski, A. Dependence of Power Characteristics on Savonius Rotor Segmentation. Energies 2021, 14, 2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Al-Gburi, K.A.H.; Al-quraishi, B.A.J.; Ismail Alnaimi, F.B.; Tan, E.S.; Al-Safi, A.H.S. Experimental and Simulation Investigation of Performance of Scaled Model for a Rotor of a Savonius Wind Turbine. Energies 2022, 15, 8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al-Ghriybah, M.; Lagum, A.A. Enhancing the Aerodynamic Performance of the Savonius Wind Turbine by Utilizing Quarter Elliptical Supplementary Blades. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2024, 112, 491–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vishnu Namboodiri, V.; Goyal, R. Benchmarking the darrieus wind turbine configurations through review and data envelopment analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2023, 25, 2123–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Developed computer model of the Savonius and Darrieus rotors.
Figure 1. Developed computer model of the Savonius and Darrieus rotors.
Inventions 10 00095 g001
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the stabilization of the aerodynamic characteristics of the savonius rotor (a); Analysis of dynamic and static parameters of the Savonius rotor during airflow simulation (b). X-axis: time, t (s); sampling Δt = 1–2 s. Y-axes: pressure (Pa), velocity (m/s), turbulence intensity (%).
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the stabilization of the aerodynamic characteristics of the savonius rotor (a); Analysis of dynamic and static parameters of the Savonius rotor during airflow simulation (b). X-axis: time, t (s); sampling Δt = 1–2 s. Y-axes: pressure (Pa), velocity (m/s), turbulence intensity (%).
Inventions 10 00095 g002
Figure 3. Deformation of the Savonius rotor at a wind speed of 25 m/s.
Figure 3. Deformation of the Savonius rotor at a wind speed of 25 m/s.
Inventions 10 00095 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional model of a two-stage Savonius rotor created in SolidWorks.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional model of a two-stage Savonius rotor created in SolidWorks.
Inventions 10 00095 g004
Figure 5. Pressure distribution on rotor blades at wind speed 25 m/s. X-axis: time, t (s); Y-axis: pressure (Pa) (a); Velocity magnitude (m/s) around the Savonius rotor at U∞ = 25 ms−1; contours highlight leading-edge acceleration and downstream wake deficit (b).
Figure 5. Pressure distribution on rotor blades at wind speed 25 m/s. X-axis: time, t (s); Y-axis: pressure (Pa) (a); Velocity magnitude (m/s) around the Savonius rotor at U∞ = 25 ms−1; contours highlight leading-edge acceleration and downstream wake deficit (b).
Inventions 10 00095 g005
Figure 6. Deformation modeling of a classic Savonius rotor.
Figure 6. Deformation modeling of a classic Savonius rotor.
Inventions 10 00095 g006
Figure 7. Three-dimensional model of the Darrieus rotor.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional model of the Darrieus rotor.
Inventions 10 00095 g007
Figure 8. Graph of normalized operating parameters of the Darrieus rotor. X-axis: time, t (s); one iteration = 1 s. Y-axis: normalized value (dimensionless, 0–1) (a); Operating parameters of the Darrieus rotor. Values are phase-averaged unless marked as “peak”; peaks are reported as diagnostics and do not serve as convergence criteria (b).
Figure 8. Graph of normalized operating parameters of the Darrieus rotor. X-axis: time, t (s); one iteration = 1 s. Y-axis: normalized value (dimensionless, 0–1) (a); Operating parameters of the Darrieus rotor. Values are phase-averaged unless marked as “peak”; peaks are reported as diagnostics and do not serve as convergence criteria (b).
Inventions 10 00095 g008
Figure 9. Deformation modeling of the Darrieus rotor.
Figure 9. Deformation modeling of the Darrieus rotor.
Inventions 10 00095 g009
Figure 10. Dinamic pressure vs. velocity with markers at U.
Figure 10. Dinamic pressure vs. velocity with markers at U.
Inventions 10 00095 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fazylova, A.; Alipbayev, K.; Aden, A.; Oraz, F.; Iliev, T.; Stoyanov, I. A Comparative Review of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Designs: Savonius Rotor vs. Darrieus Rotor. Inventions 2025, 10, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions10060095

AMA Style

Fazylova A, Alipbayev K, Aden A, Oraz F, Iliev T, Stoyanov I. A Comparative Review of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Designs: Savonius Rotor vs. Darrieus Rotor. Inventions. 2025; 10(6):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions10060095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fazylova, Alina, Kuanysh Alipbayev, Alisher Aden, Fariza Oraz, Teodor Iliev, and Ivaylo Stoyanov. 2025. "A Comparative Review of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Designs: Savonius Rotor vs. Darrieus Rotor" Inventions 10, no. 6: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions10060095

APA Style

Fazylova, A., Alipbayev, K., Aden, A., Oraz, F., Iliev, T., & Stoyanov, I. (2025). A Comparative Review of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Designs: Savonius Rotor vs. Darrieus Rotor. Inventions, 10(6), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions10060095

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop