Comparison of Cost of Protection against Differential Power Analysis of Selected Authenticated Ciphers†
AbstractAuthenticated ciphers, which combine the cryptographic services of confidentiality, integrity, and authentication into one algorithmic construct, can potentially provide improved security and efficiencies in the processing of sensitive data. However, they are vulnerable to side-channel attacks such as differential power analysis (DPA). Although the Test Vector Leakage Assessment (TVLA) methodology has been used to confirm improved resistance of block ciphers to DPA after application of countermeasures, extension of TVLA to authenticated ciphers is non-trivial, since authenticated ciphers have expanded input and output requirements, complex interfaces, and long test vectors which include protocol necessary to describe authenticated cipher operations. In this research, we upgrade the FOBOS test architecture with capability to perform TVLA on authenticated ciphers. We show that FPGA implementations of the CAESAR Round 3 candidates ACORN, Ascon, CLOC (with AES and TWINE primitives), SILC (with AES, PRESENT, and LED primitives), JAMBU (with AES and SIMON primitives), and Ketje Jr.; as well as AES-GCM, are vulnerable to 1st order DPA. We then use threshold implementations to protect the above cipher implementations against 1st order DPA, and verify the effectiveness of countermeasures using the TVLA methodology. Finally, we compare the unprotected and protected cipher implementations in terms of area, performance (maximum frequency and throughput), throughput-to-area (TP/A) ratio, power, and energy per bit (E/bit). Our results show that ACORN consumes the lowest number of resources, has the highest TP/A ratio, and is the most energy-efficient of all DPA-resistant implementations. However, Ketje Jr. has the highest throughput. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Diehl, W.; Abdulgadir, A.; Farahmand, F.; Kaps, J.-P.; Gaj, K. Comparison of Cost of Protection against Differential Power Analysis of Selected Authenticated Ciphers. Cryptography 2018, 2, 26.
Diehl W, Abdulgadir A, Farahmand F, Kaps J-P, Gaj K. Comparison of Cost of Protection against Differential Power Analysis of Selected Authenticated Ciphers. Cryptography. 2018; 2(3):26.Chicago/Turabian Style
Diehl, William; Abdulgadir, Abubakr; Farahmand, Farnoud; Kaps, Jens-Peter; Gaj, Kris. 2018. "Comparison of Cost of Protection against Differential Power Analysis of Selected Authenticated Ciphers." Cryptography 2, no. 3: 26.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.