The author would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
- (1)
- Affiliation change:Department of Philosophy, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia.
- (2)
- Name correction of the philosopher Michelle Maiese in Section 2 “Theoretical Framework”.
Original text:
Michelle Maze presents an argument that challenges the traditional separation between cognitive and bodily aspects of emotions [49] (p. 514). Maze suggests that understanding emotions as a means of interacting with and giving meaning to the external world can help bridge this divide. Maze introduces the concept of affective framing as a foundational basis for emotional experiences. According to Maze, affective framing involves the evaluation of the environment through bodily sensations of care, which leads to the merging of cognitive and bodily elements in emotions. This concept not only clarifies the relationship between the cognitive and bodily aspects of emotions but also offers a valuable framework for understanding the intentional focus and phenomenal nature of emotional experiences.
Updated text:
Michelle Maiese presents an argument that challenges the traditional separation between cognitive and bodily aspects of emotions [49] (p. 514). Maiese suggests that understanding emotions as a means of interacting with and giving meaning to the external world can help bridge this divide. Maiese introduces the concept of affective framing as a foundational basis for emotional experiences. According to Maiese, affective framing involves the evaluation of the environment through bodily sensations of care, which leads to the merging of cognitive and bodily elements in emotions. This concept not only clarifies the relationship between the cognitive and bodily aspects of emotions but also offers a valuable framework for understanding the intentional focus and phenomenal nature of emotional experiences.
- (3)
- Adding an Acknowledgment section.
Acknowledgments: AI-assisted tools were used in the preparation (translation of the article into English) of the article.
Reference
- Shutaleva, A. Epistemic Challenges in Neurophenomenology: Exploring the Reliability of Knowledge and Its Ontological Implications. Philosophies 2023, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).