Reply published on 17 April 2018,
see
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(2), 14.
Comment of
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(2), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns4020013
Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
1
Green Lane Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Service, Starship Children’s Hospital, 1023 Auckland, New Zealand
2
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, 1142 Auckland, New Zealand
3
Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, 41650 Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 January 2018 / Revised: 2 April 2018 / Accepted: 10 April 2018 / Published: 14 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects)
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.
Excerpt
We read the review article by Kluckow M (Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening[...] View Full-TextKeywords:
pulse oximetry; screening; critical congenital heart disease; neonate
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Gentles, T.L.; Cloete, E.; Mellander, M. Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4, 13.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Article Metrics
Comments
[Return to top]
Int. J. Neonatal Screen.
EISSN 2409-515X
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert