Previous Article in Journal
A Review of “My Life in Science: The Story of Biotinidase Deficiency” by Dr. Barry Wolf
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Expanded Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism at a Single Center in Louisiana (2005–2024): Outcomes

1
Hayward Genetics Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
2
Department of Pediatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(4), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040112
Submission received: 27 October 2025 / Revised: 26 November 2025 / Accepted: 8 December 2025 / Published: 9 December 2025

Abstract

This study evaluates the incidence of metabolic disorders detected from January 2005 to December 2024 and their clinical outcomes. Data were retrospectively collected from the Louisiana Newborn Screening database. Clinical outcomes were obtained through review of corresponding medical records. In addition, an electronic questionnaire assessing educational attainment and neurodevelopmental disorders was sent to the patients’ families. Of 1,230,356 infants screened, 478 were diagnosed with metabolic disorders, corresponding to an incidence of 1 in 2574 live births. The three most commonly identified conditions were biotinidase deficiency, phenylketonuria (PKU), and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD). During the study period, at least 11 patients died. The program demonstrated a false-positive rate of 0.93%. Twelve patients (7%) were symptomatic before or at the time of NBS result notification. Recurrent metabolic decompensations occurred in 3 of 4 maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) cases, 7 of 7 methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) cases, 1 of 4 propionic acidemia (PA) cases and 1 of 7 urea cycle defect cases. Regarding long-term outcomes, 45.7% of survey respondents reported adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes of varying severity. Early detection and timely intervention have contributed to normal or near-normal outcomes in many cases. However, the morbidity and mortality observed in some patients despite early diagnosis highlights the severity and complexity of certain metabolic conditions. Additionally, the relatively high false positive rate underscores the need for ongoing efforts to improve the specificity of screening protocols to reduce unnecessary follow-ups and mitigate potential stress for families.
Keywords: newborn screening; clinical outcome; neurodevelopmental outcome; inborn error of metabolism; tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening; clinical outcome; neurodevelopmental outcome; inborn error of metabolism; tandem mass spectrometry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Upadia, J.; Noh, G.; Crivelly, K.; Aziz, E.; Cunningham, A.; Andersson, H.C. Expanded Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism at a Single Center in Louisiana (2005–2024): Outcomes. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040112

AMA Style

Upadia J, Noh G, Crivelly K, Aziz E, Cunningham A, Andersson HC. Expanded Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism at a Single Center in Louisiana (2005–2024): Outcomes. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2025; 11(4):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Upadia, Jariya, Grace Noh, Kea Crivelly, Elise Aziz, Amy Cunningham, and Hans C. Andersson. 2025. "Expanded Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism at a Single Center in Louisiana (2005–2024): Outcomes" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 11, no. 4: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040112

APA Style

Upadia, J., Noh, G., Crivelly, K., Aziz, E., Cunningham, A., & Andersson, H. C. (2025). Expanded Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism at a Single Center in Louisiana (2005–2024): Outcomes. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 11(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop