Next Article in Journal
Tumor Sphericity Predicts Response in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's

by
Dmitry Cherezov
1,*,
Rahul Paul
1,
Nikolai Fetisov
1,
Robert J. Gillies
2,
Matthew B. Schabath
3,
Dmitry B. Goldgof
1 and
Lawrence O. Hall
1
1
Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, University of South Florida, 2215 N Spring Glade Cir, Tampa, FL 33613, USA
2
Departments of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
3
Departments of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2020, 6(2), 209-215; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00024
Submission received: 9 March 2020 / Revised: 6 April 2020 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 / Published: 1 June 2020

Abstract

Noninvasive diagnosis of lung cancer in early stages is one task where radiomics helps. Clinical practice shows that the size of a nodule has high predictive power for malignancy. In the literature, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become widely used in medical image analysis. We study the ability of a CNN to capture nodule size in computed tomography images after images are resized for CNN input. For our experiments, we used the National Lung Screening Trial data set. Nodules were labeled into 2 categories (small/large) based on the original size of a nodule. After all extracted patches were re-sampled into 100-by-100-pixel images, a CNN was able to successfully classify test nodules into small- and large-size groups with high accuracy. To show the generality of our discovery, we repeated size classification experiments using Common Objects in Context (COCO) data set. From the data set, we selected 3 categories of images, namely, bears, cats, and dogs. For all 3 categories a 5- × 2-fold cross-validation was performed to put them into small and large classes. The average area under receiver operating curve is 0.954, 0.952, and 0.979 for the bear, cat, and dog categories, respectively. Thus, camera image rescaling also enables a CNN to discover the size of an object. The source code for experiments with the COCO data set is publicly available in Github (https://github.com/VisionAI-USF/COCO_Size_Decoding/).
Keywords: convolutional neural network; explanation; lung cancer; computed tomography; camera images convolutional neural network; explanation; lung cancer; computed tomography; camera images

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cherezov, D.; Paul, R.; Fetisov, N.; Gillies, R.J.; Schabath, M.B.; Goldgof, D.B.; Hall, L.O. Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's. Tomography 2020, 6, 209-215. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00024

AMA Style

Cherezov D, Paul R, Fetisov N, Gillies RJ, Schabath MB, Goldgof DB, Hall LO. Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's. Tomography. 2020; 6(2):209-215. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cherezov, Dmitry, Rahul Paul, Nikolai Fetisov, Robert J. Gillies, Matthew B. Schabath, Dmitry B. Goldgof, and Lawrence O. Hall. 2020. "Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's" Tomography 6, no. 2: 209-215. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00024

APA Style

Cherezov, D., Paul, R., Fetisov, N., Gillies, R. J., Schabath, M. B., Goldgof, D. B., & Hall, L. O. (2020). Lung Nodule Sizes Are Encoded When Scaling CT Image for CNN's. Tomography, 6(2), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop