Next Article in Journal
Characterizing the Influence of Preload Dosing on Percent Signal Recovery (PSR) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) Measurements in a Patient Population with High-Grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI at 7 T: Tail-Scaling Analysis and Inferences about Field Strength Dependence
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping

by
Antonis Matakos
1,*,
James M. Balter
1,2 and
Yue Cao
1,2,3
1
Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2
Departments of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
3
Departments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2017, 3(2), 79-88; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00003
Submission received: 8 March 2017 / Revised: 3 April 2017 / Accepted: 6 May 2017 / Published: 1 June 2017

Abstract

We developed an optimized and robust method to estimate liver B0 field inhomogeneity for monitoring and correcting susceptibility-induced geometric distortion in magnetic resonance images for precision therapy. A triple-gradient-echo acquisition was optimized for the whole liver B0 field estimation within a single-exhale breath-hold scan on a 3 T scanner. To eliminate chemical-shift artifacts, fat signals were chosen in-phase between 2 echoes with an echo time difference (ΔTE) of 2.3 milliseconds. To avoid phase-wrapping, other 2 echoes provided a large field dynamic range (1/ΔTE) to cover the B0 field inhomogeneity. In addition, using high parallel imaging factor of 4 and a readout-bandwidth of 1955 Hz/pixel, an ∼18-second acquisition time for breath-held scans was achieved. A 2-step, 1-dimensional regularized method for the ΔB0 field map estimation was developed, tested and validated in phantom and patient studies. Our method was validated on a water phantom with fat components and air pockets; it yielded ΔB0-field maps that had no chemical-shift and phase-wrapping artifacts, and it had a <0.5 mm of geometric distortion near the air pockets. The ΔB0-field maps of the patients' abdominal regions were also free from phase-wrapping and chemical-shift artifacts. The maximum field inhomogeneity was found near the lung–liver interface, up to ∼300 Hz, resulting in ∼2 mm of distortions in anatomical images with a readout-bandwidth of 440 Hz/pixel. The field mapping method in the abdominal region is robust; it can be easily integrated in clinical workflow for patient-based quality control of magnetic resonance imaging geometric integrity.
Keywords: fat/water chemical-shift; B0 inhomogeneity field map; multiecho GRE fat/water chemical-shift; B0 inhomogeneity field map; multiecho GRE

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matakos, A.; Balter, J.M.; Cao, Y. A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping. Tomography 2017, 3, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00003

AMA Style

Matakos A, Balter JM, Cao Y. A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping. Tomography. 2017; 3(2):79-88. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matakos, Antonis, James M. Balter, and Yue Cao. 2017. "A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping" Tomography 3, no. 2: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00003

APA Style

Matakos, A., Balter, J. M., & Cao, Y. (2017). A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping. Tomography, 3(2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop