Next Article in Journal
The Quantitative Imaging Network in Precision Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Hypoxia Imaging with PET Correlates with Antitumor Activity of the Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug Evofosfamide (TH-302) in Rodent Glioma Models
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Wangerin et al. (2015)

by
Kristen A. Wangerin
1,
Mark Muzi
2,
Lanell M. Peterson
2,
Hannah M. Linden
3,
Alena Novakova
3,
Finbarr O’Sullivan
4,
Brenda F. Kurland
5,
David A. Mankoff
6 and
Paul E. Kinahan
1,2,*
1
Departments of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2
Departments of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
3
Departments of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
4
Department of Statistics, University of Cork, Cork, Ireland
5
Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
6
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2016, 2(3), 238; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00262
Submission received: 11 June 2016 / Revised: 6 July 2016 / Accepted: 2 August 2016 / Published: 1 September 2016

Abstract

Prior reports have suggested that delayed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) oncology imaging can improve the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for known lesions. Our goal was to estimaterealistic bounds for lesion detectability for static measurements within 1 to 4 hours between FDG injectionand image acquisition. Tumor and normal tissue kinetic model parameters were estimated from dynamic PETstudies of patients with early-stage breast cancer. These parameters were used to generate time-activitycurves (TACs) for up to 4 hours, for which we assumed both nonreversible and reversible models with differ-ent rates of FDG dephosphorylation (k4). For each pair of tumor and normal tissue TACs, 600 PET sinogramrealizations were generated, and images were reconstructed using the ordered subsets expectation maximi-zation reconstruction algorithm. Test statistics for each tumor and normal tissue region of interest were outputfrom the computer model observers and evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, with thecalculated area under the curve (AUC) providing a measure of lesion detectability. For the nonreversiblemodel (k4 = 0), the AUC increased in 11 of 23 (48%) patients for 1 to 2 hours after the current standardpostradiotracer injection imaging window of 1 hour. This improvement was driven by increased tumor/nor-mal tissue contrast before the impact of increased noise that resulted from radiotracer decay began to domi-nate the imaging signal. Ask4was increased from 0 to 0.01 min1, the time of maximum detectabilityshifted earlier, due to decreasing FDG concentration in the tumor lowering the CNR. These results imply thatdelayed PET imaging may reveal inconspicuous lesions that otherwise would have gone undetected.
Keywords: physics; PET; breast imaging; lesion detectability; virtual clinical trial physics; PET; breast imaging; lesion detectability; virtual clinical trial

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wangerin, K.A.; Muzi, M.; Peterson, L.M.; Linden, H.M.; Novakova, A.; O’Sullivan, F.; Kurland, B.F.; Mankoff, D.A.; Kinahan, P.E. Erratum: Wangerin et al. (2015). Tomography 2016, 2, 238. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00262

AMA Style

Wangerin KA, Muzi M, Peterson LM, Linden HM, Novakova A, O’Sullivan F, Kurland BF, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE. Erratum: Wangerin et al. (2015). Tomography. 2016; 2(3):238. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wangerin, Kristen A., Mark Muzi, Lanell M. Peterson, Hannah M. Linden, Alena Novakova, Finbarr O’Sullivan, Brenda F. Kurland, David A. Mankoff, and Paul E. Kinahan. 2016. "Erratum: Wangerin et al. (2015)" Tomography 2, no. 3: 238. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00262

APA Style

Wangerin, K. A., Muzi, M., Peterson, L. M., Linden, H. M., Novakova, A., O’Sullivan, F., Kurland, B. F., Mankoff, D. A., & Kinahan, P. E. (2016). Erratum: Wangerin et al. (2015). Tomography, 2(3), 238. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00262

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop