Next Article in Journal
Imaging Sensitivity of Quiescent Cancer Cells to Metabolic Perturbations in Bone Marrow Spheroids
Previous Article in Journal
Imaging Renal Urea Handling in Rats at Millimeter Resolution Using Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optoacoustic Tomography Using Accelerated Sparse Recovery and Coherence Factor Weighting

by
Hailong He
1,2,
Jaya Prakash
1,2,
Andreas Buehler
1,2 and
Vasilis Ntziachristos
1,2,*
1
Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany
2
Chair for Biological Imaging, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2016, 2(2), 138-145; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00148
Submission received: 6 May 2016 / Revised: 8 May 2016 / Accepted: 8 May 2016 / Published: 1 June 2016

Abstract

Sparse recovery algorithms have shown great potential to accurately reconstruct images using limited-view optoacoustic (photoacoustic) tomography data sets, but these are computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose an improvement of the fast converging Split Augmented Lagrangian Shrinkage Algorithm method based on least square QR inversion for improving the reconstruction speed. We further show image fidelity improvement when using a coherence factor to weight the reconstruction result. Phantom and in vivo measurements show that the accelerated Split Augmented Lagrangian Shrinkage Algorithm method with coherence factor weighting offers images with reduced artifacts and provides faster convergence compared with existing sparse recovery algorithms.
Keywords: optoacoustic tomography; photoacoustic tomography; model-based reconstruction; sparse recovery method optoacoustic tomography; photoacoustic tomography; model-based reconstruction; sparse recovery method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, H.; Prakash, J.; Buehler, A.; Ntziachristos, V. Optoacoustic Tomography Using Accelerated Sparse Recovery and Coherence Factor Weighting. Tomography 2016, 2, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00148

AMA Style

He H, Prakash J, Buehler A, Ntziachristos V. Optoacoustic Tomography Using Accelerated Sparse Recovery and Coherence Factor Weighting. Tomography. 2016; 2(2):138-145. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00148

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Hailong, Jaya Prakash, Andreas Buehler, and Vasilis Ntziachristos. 2016. "Optoacoustic Tomography Using Accelerated Sparse Recovery and Coherence Factor Weighting" Tomography 2, no. 2: 138-145. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00148

APA Style

He, H., Prakash, J., Buehler, A., & Ntziachristos, V. (2016). Optoacoustic Tomography Using Accelerated Sparse Recovery and Coherence Factor Weighting. Tomography, 2(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00148

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop