Next Article in Journal
Research on Path Planning Method for Mobile Platforms Based on Hybrid Swarm Intelligence Algorithms in Multi-Dimensional Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Development of a Real-Time Pressure-Driven Monitoring System for In Vitro Microvasculature Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Artificial Eagle-Inspired Optimization Algorithm for Trade Hub Location and Allocation Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best–Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems

1
Salford Business School, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
2
ESC Amiens, 80000 Amiens, France
3
School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
4
Taizhou Institute of Zhejiang University, Taizhou 318000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomimetics 2025, 10(8), 504; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10080504 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 July 2025 / Revised: 26 July 2025 / Accepted: 29 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms 2025)

Abstract

The Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) is a widely used swarm intelligence algorithm. Encouraged by the theory of no free lunch and the inherent shortcomings of the SMA, this work proposes a new variant of the SMA, called the BWSMA, in which three improvement mechanisms are integrated. The adaptive greedy mechanism is used to accelerate the convergence of the algorithm and avoid ineffective updates. The best–worst management strategy improves the quality of the population and increases its search capability. The stagnant replacement mechanism prevents the algorithm from falling into a local optimum by replacing stalled individuals. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, this paper conducts a full range of experiments on the CEC2018 test suite and the CEC2022 test suite and compares BWSMA with three derived algorithms, eight SMA variants, and eight other improved algorithms. The experimental results are analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the Friedman test, and the Nemenyi test. The results indicate that the BWSMA significantly outperforms these compared algorithms. In the comparison with the SMA variants, the BWSMA obtained average rankings of 1.414, 1.138, 1.069, and 1.414. In comparison with other improved algorithms, the BWSMA obtained average rankings of 2.583 and 1.833. Finally, the applicability of the BWSMA is further validated through two structural optimization problems. In conclusion, the proposed BWSMA is a promising algorithm with excellent search accuracy and robustness.

1. Introduction

In today’s world, the difficulty of optimization problems is increasing with the rapid development of technology and the increasing complexity of engineering applications [1]. These complex problems usually have multiple local optimal solutions, high dimensionality, and complex coupling relationships, which bring unprecedented challenges to the traditional solution methods [1]. To cope with these difficulties, optimization algorithms have become a hot research topic. Optimization algorithms are mainly divided into two categories: deterministic algorithms and nondeterministic algorithms [2]. Deterministic algorithms generate consistent outputs with the same inputs, and they rely on a rigorous computational process to find exact solutions [3]. However, such algorithms often take too long to run due to excessive computation when dealing with large-scale data. In addition, when faced with complex and variable high-dimensional problems, deterministic algorithms are prone to fall into local optimal solutions and exhibit low adaptability. In contrast, metaheuristic algorithms among the nondeterministic algorithms stand out with their unique advantages. Metaheuristic algorithms do not rely on the derivative information of the problem and are able to find approximate optimal solutions quickly in complex and variable environments [4]. Such algorithms are widely adopted in several fields, such as task planning [5,6,7], image processing [8,9,10], parameter tuning [11,12,13], feature selection [14,15,16], energy management [17,18,19], biomedical detection [20,21,22], electronic monitoring systems [23,24], model calibration [25,26], etc.
These algorithms do have certain drawbacks, though. When dealing with difficult problems, they have a tendency to converge slowly, lack stability, and fall into local optimum. Researchers have been investigating novel metaheuristic algorithms and enhancement techniques in an effort to get beyond these restrictions. Numerous innovative algorithms have been put forth, drawing influence from a variety of disciplines, including physics, sociology, and biology. To enhance their effectiveness, these algorithms mimic social behaviors and natural events in an effort to strike a better balance between exploration and exploitation. Evolution-based algorithms (EAs), physics-based algorithms (PAs), human-based algorithms (HAs), and swarm intelligence algorithms (SIAs) are the four basic categories into which metaheuristic algorithms can be generally divided.
The Genetic Algorithm (GA) [27] and Differential Evolution (DE) [28] are designed based on the idea of evolution, including selection, mutation, and crossover, and we categorize them as EAs. Apart from these, there are some other algorithms based on evolutionary ideas, such as Genetic Programming (GP) [29], Evolutionary Strategies (ESs) [30], Alpha Evolution Algorithm (AEA) [31], and Evolutionary Mating Algorithm (EMA) [32]. PAs include Simulated Annealing (SA) [33], Nuclear Reaction Optimization (NRO) [34], Tornado Optimizer with Coriolis force (TOC) [35], Polar Lights Optimizer (PLO) [36], Newton–Raphson-Based Optimizer (NRBO) [37], Light Spectrum Optimizer (LSO) [38], Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) [39], Attraction–Repulsion Optimization Algorithm (AROA) [40], Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) [41], Prism Refraction Search (PRS) [42], and others. It has encompassed Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) [43], Literature Research Optimizer (LRO) [44], Preschool Education Optimization Algorithm (PEOA) [45], Enterprise Development Optimization (EDO) [46], Information Acquisition Optimizer (IAO) [47], Football Team Training Algorithm (FTTA) [48], Rider Optimization Algorithm (ROA) [49], Escape Optimization Algorithm (EOA) [50], Kids Learning Optimizer (KLO) [51], Human Memory Optimization Algorithm (HMOA) [52], and similar approaches. SIAs are one of the largest groups of metaheuristic algorithms. Algorithms such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [53], Lemurs Optimizer (LO) [54], Graylag Goose Optimization (GGO) [55], Snow Geese Algorithm (SGA) [56], Tuna Swarm Optimization (TSO) [1], Blood-Sucking Leech Optimizer (BSLO) [57], Black Eagle Optimizer (BEO) [58], Elk Herd Optimizer (EHO) [59], Sled Dog Optimizer (SDO) [60], and Electric Eel Foraging Optimization (EEFO) [61], which mimic the behaviors of various swarming groups in nature, are classified as SIAs. These four categories of metaheuristic algorithms are summarized in Figure 1.
In 2020, Li et al. [57] introduced the Slime Mould method (SMA), a swarm intelligence method. The SMA primarily mimics slime molds’ feeding habits and morphological changes. The SMA has been widely used in various optimization sectors because to its exceptional performance. Like many other MAs, the SMA has been successful in certain problem areas, but it is important to understand its limitations. Furthermore, no algorithm can offer the most suitable response in any particular domain, according to the “no free lunch” (NFL) concept [58]. It is vital to enhance the SMA in order to increase its performance and expand their applications. Researchers have attempted in several ways to remedy the SMA’s limitations in recent years. Ornek et al. incorporated the sine–cosine algorithm in order to improve the search capability of the SMA [62]. To solve the PV cell model parameter estimation, Mostafa et al. used adaptive weights to dynamically adjust the search behavior of slime molds [63]. Yu et al. further refined the biological mechanisms of the SMA by adding pole growth, memory, and amoebic mechanisms to improve the overall performance of the SMA [64]. Chen et al. introduced the arithmetic optimization algorithm into the SMA for improving its exploitation and integrated the mutation strategy and restart strategy to help the SMA jump out of the local optimum [65]. Alhashash et al. developed a new SMA variant that utilizes an adaptive intelligent switching mechanism to dynamically select different search operators [66]. Conteh et al. proposed a triangular variation rule and a good point set initialization strategy for addressing the shortcomings of poor diversity in SMA populations [67]. In order to solve the multi-UAV path-planning problem, Ma et al. proposed an adaptive improved SMA to enrich the population diversity by integrating an adaptive switching operator and an adaptive perturbation strategy [68]. Focusing on improving the initial population quality of the SMA, Duan et al. proposed an elite population initialization strategy based on Bloch balls and dynamically adjusted the step size using an adaptive search operator to improve the search efficiency [69]. With the review of the above SMA variants, we observe that the SMA suffers from the deficiencies of unbalanced exploitation and exploration, insufficient population diversity, and difficulty in escaping from the trap of local optimum. Although these variants solve the deficiencies of the SMA to some extent, there is still room for further improvement of the SMA.
In this work, an SMA variant integrating the adaptive greedy mechanism (AGM), best–worst management strategy (BWS), and stagnant replacement mechanism (SRM) is proposed, which is called the BWSMA. The AGM can dynamically adjust the execution of the greedy mechanism or not, which simultaneously achieves fast convergence and avoids population clustering. The BWS strategy improves the quality of the superior and inferior groups and promotes the balance between global and local search. The SRM strategy reduces the probability of the SMA falling into a local optimum by updating stagnant individuals. In order to fully assess the performance of the BWSMA, we conducted three experiments. First, we evaluated the impact of the proposed three strategies on the BWSMA based on the CEC2018 and CEC2022 test sets. Then, we compared the performance of the BWSMA and other SMA variants on the CEC2018 test set. Finally, to further validate the performance of the BWSMA, we compare it with other state-of-the-art metaheuristics on the CEC2022 test set. The experimental results indicate that the BWSMA performs well on these benchmark function problems, demonstrating its potential for solving a wide range of complex problems. The contributions and highlights of this paper are as follows:
(1)
The AGM mechanism effectively enhances the exploitation of the SMA and improves its convergence speed while enriching the population diversity.
(2)
The BWS enhances the global exploration ability of the algorithm by utilizing the information of the dominant group to guide the population towards high-quality regions, and the introduction of dominant individuals enhances the ability of the SMA to utilize local regions and achieve better convergence to the target solution.
(3)
The SRM prevents the population from falling into search stagnation.
(4)
The superior performance of the BWSMA is verified by comparing it with eight SMA variants and eight state-of-the-art improved algorithms on the CEC2018 and CEC2022 test sets.
(5)
The applicability of the BWSMA is verified in two engineering constrained-optimization problems.
The remainder of this work is structured as follows: Section 2 describes the principles of the basic SMA. Section 3 elaborates on the proposed BWSMA, providing flowcharts, pseudo-code, and time complexity analysis. In Section 4, the BWSMA is thoroughly examined, and a detailed analysis is provided. In Section 5, the BWSMA is examined for its applicability in engineering constrained-optimization problems. Finally, Section 6 summarizes the results of related work and provides an outlook on future research directions.

2. Overview of Slime Mould Algorithm

The basic SMA models the algorithm by simulating the foraging behavior and morphological changes of slime molds. The SMA first calculates the concentration of each food item, and then after determining the location of the food item, the slime molds keep approaching and surrounding the food item. Finally, the operation of grasping the food is executed. The specific model of the SMA is represented as follows:

2.1. Population Initialization

As a swarm intelligence algorithm, the SMA adopts the same method as other swarm intelligence algorithms when initializing the population. That is, N individuals are randomly generated in a D -dimensional space with a lower limit of l b and an upper limit of u b , as shown in Equation (1):
P i i n i = r a n d × ( u b l b ) + l b , i = 1 , 2 , , N
where P i i n i denotes the initial position of the i t h individual, and r a n d is a random vector in the range [0, 1].

2.2. Position Updating

The SMA has a total of three different updating methods in the position updating phase, and the decision of which method to use is based on the values of the parameters p i and z . The three methods of updating the SMA are shown in Equations (2)–(4):
P i t + 1 = r a n d × ( u b l b ) + l b ,   r a n d < z
P i t + 1 = P b e s t + v b × ( W × P a t P b t ) ,   r a n d z   and   r a n d < p i
P i t + 1 = v c × P i t ,   r a n d z   and   r a n d p i
where z is a constant value, which is taken to be 0.03 in the SMA source literature. p i is calculated from the fitness of the individual itself and the fitness of the best global individual, as shown in Equation (5). P i t + 1 is the position of the i t h individual at iteration t + 1 . P b e s t is the position of the global optimal individual. P a t and P b t are two different individuals randomly selected from the current slime mold population. v b and v c are two D-dimensional vectors, where v b is in the range c , c and v c is in the range d , d . c and d are defined by Equations (6) and (7). W is a weighting factor, as shown in Equation (8).
p i = tanh F P i t F P b e s t
c = a r c t a n h ( ( t / T ) + 1 )
d = 1 t / T
W ( s m e l l i n d e x ( i ) ) = 1 + r a n d × log ( F P b t F P i t F P b t F P w t ) , c o n d i t i o n 1 r a n d × log ( F P b t F P i t F P b t F P w t ) , o t h e r s
s m e l l i n d e x = s o r t ( F X t )
Here, F P i t denotes the fitness of the i t h individual. F P b e s t is the fitness of the best individual. T denotes the maximum number of iterations. P b t and P w t are the best and worst individuals of the current population. s m e l l i n d e x represents a sorted array of fitness values derived from sorting F X t . c o n d i t i o n denotes individuals ranked in the top half of fitness values.

3. Framework of the Proposed BWSMA

In order to solve the concerns of the SMA such as slow convergence speed, low accuracy, and easy to fall into local optimum, we propose an SMA variant called the BWSMA. The proposed BWSMA is integrated with three improvement techniques on the basis of the SMA: adaptive greedy mechanism (AGM), best–worst management strategy (BWS), and stagnant replacement mechanism (SRM). In this section, we introduce the above three improvement mechanisms in turn and provide the pseudo-code, flowchart, and time complexity analysis of the proposed BWSMA.

3.1. Adaptive Greedy Mechanism

In the basic SMA, all individuals retain the newest individual directly after updating, regardless of whether it gets better or worse. This inheritance relationship between parent and child individuals is not conducive to the convergence of the algorithm. Greedy selection is a simple and efficient mechanism that requires each individual to judge the goodness or badness of the new individual after each update and then decide whether to use the new individual or not. This inheritance mechanism accelerates the convergence of the algorithm. However, the greedy mechanism is also problematic. A focus on keeping better offspring individuals tends to lead to clustering of the population, which is not conducive to exploring a wider area. At the same time, the offspring that did not get better may get better in the next iteration, but we abandon it using the greedy mechanism. Therefore, we cannot use the greedy mechanism for all of them, nor can we ignore the good and bad and keep them directly. For this reason, this paper proposes an adaptive greedy mechanism (AGM). In the AGM, we decide which approach to use by judging the current number of individuals that have become good by choosing the greedy strategy and by retaining them directly. For each individual, we determine the size of the switching parameters S and rand, and when rand < S , the individual uses the greedy mechanism. Conversely, the individual simply keeps the latest position. S is obtained from Equation (10).
S t + 1 = S t + 0.05 × 1 S t × G S b e t t e r G S K D b e t t e r K D × t / T
Here, G S is the number of individuals that select the greedy mechanism. K D is the number of individuals that directly keep the newest position. G S b e t t e r is the number of offspring individuals that outperform the parent individuals after selecting the greedy mechanism. K D b e t t e r is the number of individuals that actually become better by directly keeping the newest position.

3.2. Best–Worst Management Strategy

In the metaheuristic algorithm, the superior individuals represent the current promising search direction, and the inferior individuals represent the current search region with no prospect. However, superior individuals may guide the population to gradually fall into the local optimum trap, and inferior individuals are instead able to expand the search area. This is because the exploration phase is only a rough search of large areas, and the exploitation phase is a precise search in the search areas determined in the previous phase, and these large areas may not contain optimal locations, but instead, optimal locations may exist in areas that were considered hopeless in the previous phase. Therefore, it is necessary to utilize the characteristics of different groups to guide the population search. To this end, this paper proposes a best–worst management strategy (BWS). In the BWS, we divide the population into three subpopulations according to fitness: the superior group, the balanced group, and the inferior group. For the N 1 individuals with better fitness, we require them to have the best convergence ability while spacing the local optimal avoidance ability. For the N 2 individuals with poor adaptation, we want them to maximize the search range. For the middle part of the individuals, we let the dynamic selection be developed and explored, i.e., the original SMA update formula. The updating methods for the superior and inferior individuals are shown below:
Superior   Group :   P i t + 1 = P i t + P w + P e 3 + g i , g i ~ N 0 , C
inferior   Group :   P i t + 1 = P w + g i , g i ~ N 0 , C
C = 1 Q d i = 1 Q d P i Q P w × P i Q P w T , P i Q Q d
P w = i = 1 Q d ln Q d + 1 / i = 1 Q d ln Q d + 1 ln i × P i Q , P i Q Q d
where P w is the weighted average position of the best individuals. Replacing the arithmetic average with a weighted average better captures the contribution of each individual to the search trend. P e is a randomly selected individual from the top three individuals in terms of fitness, inspired by the Gray Wolf Optimizer [70]. Different superior individuals can correct the search direction and enrich the population diversity. Q d is the set of dominant groups, consisting of the top half of individuals at each iteration, and controls the size of the set according to the first-in-first-out principle.

3.3. Stagnant Replacement Mechanism

The SMA achieves positional reset for some individuals through Equation (2), which somewhat overcomes the ease of falling into localized traps. However, this approach is too blind, and resetting without timing risks resetting good individuals, which, in turn, slows down convergence. In order to effectively overcome the stagnation problem of the SMA, this paper proposes a stagnant replacement mechanism (SRM). In the SRM, the stagnant individuals will be replaced by the individuals generated by Equation (15).
P i t + 1 = P i t + 1 ( t / T ) 2 × 1 ( t / T ) × U × l b + r a n d × u b L b , r a n d 0.2 P i t + 0.2 × 1 r a n d + r a n d P a t P b t , r a n d > 0.2
In the original SMA, there is a lack of information exchange mechanism between the mucilage individuals. This is one of the reasons for the defective convergence speed and accuracy of the SMA. The SRM can effectively promote the information exchange within the population and the interaction between individuals. Therefore, it accelerates the movement of searching individuals to the optimal solution or near-optimal solution. In addition, it promotes the exploration of different regions within the search space and helps to escape from the local optimum. When each individual, the algorithm generates a new solution randomly and continues the search. This strategy increases the probability of finding the most efficient solution to the problem and improves the robustness of the algorithm. We set a counter R m i for each individual with an initial value of 0. After each iteration, we determine whether each individual has gotten better. If it does not get better, the counter R m i is added 1. If it gets better, it is not added. The SRM executes when R m i > log t .

3.4. The Implementation Steps of the BWSMA

The proposed BWSMA is obtained by combining the basic SMA with the adaptive greedy mechanism, best–worst management strategy, and stagnant replacement mechanism whose pseudo-code and flowchart are shown in Algorithm 1 and Figure 2. The initialization phase of the BWSMA is the same as the basic SMA. At each iteration, the population is divided into three subpopulations based on fitness ordering. The superior and inferior populations employ the best–worst management strategy. The balanced populations use Equations (3) and (4) of the basic SMA. After updating, all populations use the adaptive greedy mechanism to select individuals from the offspring and parent individuals to participate in the next iteration. Then, it is determined whether it is in stagnation or not, and the stagnant replacement mechanism is applied.
Algorithm 1 Pseudo-code of the BWSMA
Begin:
 //Initialization
  Initialize z, N, T, lb, ub;
  Initialize the population X i n i by Equation (1)
 //Main loop
  While (t < T) do
   Calculate the fitness of X and obtain X b e s t
   Calculate the C by Equation (13)//Best–worst management strategy
   Obtain index by sorting the population X according to fitness
   For i = 1: N do
    If index(i) < 0.3N then
     Update the position by Equation (11)//Best–worst management strategy
    Else if index(i) < 0.7N then
     Update positions by Equations (3) and (4)
    Else
     Update the position by Equation (12)//Best–worst management strategy
    End if
    End if
   End For
   Select the next population//Adaptive greedy mechanism
   Calculate the S by Equation (10)//Adaptive greedy mechanism
   For i = 1: N do
    Update positions by Equation (15)//Stagnant replacement mechanism
   End for
   t = t + 1
  End While
Return: the best fitness and X b e s t
Time complexity is a measure of the performance of an algorithm. This work proposes the BWSMA by combining the AGS, BWM, and SRM. According to Algorithm 1 and Figure 2, the BWSMA consists of population initialization, the AGS phase, the original search strategy, and the SRM phase. Here, we assume that the problem dimension is D , the number of populations is N , and the maximum number of iterations is T . Then, the complexity of the initialization step is O N × D . At one iteration, each individual will only select one of the AGS and the original search strategy, and thus, the complexity of the position updating is O N × D × T . In addition, since the SRM strategy is executed when an individual falls into a stagnation, we assume that the individuals executing the SRM at each iteration consist of N1 individuals; then, the complexity of this strategy is O N 1 × D × T . Therefore, the total time complexity of the proposed BWSMA is denoted as O D × T × N 1 + N .

4. Experimental Results and Discussion

The test sets CEC2018 and CEC2022 from the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation are chosen as test functions. Eight SMA variants and eight other advanced improved algorithms are selected for comparison. All experiments in this paper were conducted on a platform with the following specifications: a Windows 11 operating system, MATLAB R2021b, an AMD R9 7945HX CPU, and 32 GB RAM.

4.1. Test Functions and Evaluation Metrics

The IEEE CEC2018 test suite and the IEEE CEC2022 test suite are two popular public test suites that are widely used. The CEC2018 test suite contains 29 different classes of functions. The CEC2022 test suite contains 12 functions with different characteristics. These functions include unimodal, multimodal, hybrid, and composite functions that check the local search, global exploration, and ability of an algorithm to jump out of a local optimum. More information about the CEC2018 test suite and the CEC2022 test suite can be found in Table A1 and Table A2 in Appendix A. In the experiments of this paper, the dimensions of the CEC2018 test suite are set to 10, 30, 50, and 100. The dimensions of the CEC2022 test suite are set to 10 and 20. The population size of each algorithm is set to 50, and the maximum number of iterations is set to 300. Since metaheuristic algorithms belong to the category of stochastic algorithms, in order to circumvent the evaluation discrepancy caused by the randomness, all the experiments of this paper are required to be conducted 30 times. In addition, the Friedman test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Nemenyi post hoc test are used to analyze the experimental data comprehensively. The Friedman test is used for overall comparison, which can examine the overall differences between the compared algorithms. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is used for two-by-two comparisons and can examine whether there is a difference between two algorithms or not. The Nemenyi post hoc test is based on the Friedman test and can quantify the magnitude of the difference between different algorithms. It should be noted that all statistical tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05.

4.2. Comparison with BWSMA-Derived Algorithms

This paper proposes three improvement techniques to enhance the performance of the basic SMA. In order to analyze the impact of different improvement strategies on the BWSMA, the ablation experiments are performed in this section. Based on the three improvement strategies, we propose SMA-AGM, SMA-BWS, and SMA-SRM, which combine the adaptive greedy mechanism, best–worst management strategy, and stagnant replacement mechanism, respectively. By comparing the results of SMA-AGM, SMA-BWS, SMA-SRM, the SMA, and the BWSMA on the CEC2018 and CEC2022 test suites, we can demonstrate that these three mechanisms are effective in improving the performance of the mbasic SMA.
Since there are six cases in the two test sets and a full presentation of these results would take up more space, these results are summarized in Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7 and Table A8 in Appendix A, which include the best value (Best), average value (Mean), standard deviation (Std), and the rank based on the mean value (Rank). In this subsection, the obtained results will be analyzed through statistical tests.
The results of the Friedman test based on the results of ablation experiments are shown in Table 1, where “Mean rank” indicates the average ranking and “Overall rank” indicates the ordering, and the rankings of each algorithm in different dimensions are visualized in Figure 3. Based on the Friedman p-values in Table 1, it is clear that there is a significant difference between the BWSMA, SMA-AGM, SMA-BWS, SMA-SRM, and basic SMA, which are significantly different from each other. Specifically, the BWSMA ranked first on all six cases, achieving an average ranking of 1.195. The three SMA variants also ranked above the basic SMA, with rankings of 3.609, 2.434, and 3.301, respectively. These results provide a preliminary indication of the effectiveness and compatibility of the three improved strategies.
Table 2 provides the corresponding Wilcoxon rank-sum test results, where the “+” sign indicates that the BWSMA and derived algorithms outperform the basic SMA, “−” indicates that the BWSMA and derived algorithms are inferior to the basic SMA, and “=” indicates that the BWSMA and derived algorithms perform similarly to the basic SMA. According to Table 2, we can find that both the BWSMA and the three SMA variants combining a single mechanism obtain more “+” than “−”, which indicates that each mechanism improves the performance of the basic SMA. Specifically, although the AGM mechanism improves the least, the SMA-AGM applying AGM is inferior to the basic SMA in only at most one function. On the contrary, the SRM, although it improves a lot, also weakens the SMA in many functions. The BWS contributes the most to the BWSMA, which is evident from the results in both Table 1 and Table 2. From this we can conclude that BWS contributes the most, followed by SRM and AGM. The BWSMA is most powerful when all three improvement mechanisms are combined.
Convergence curves for the BWSMA, SMA, and BWSMA-derived algorithms on solving the CEC2018 test suite are provided in Figure 4, where the blue line represents the BWSMA. The complete convergence curves are summarized in Figure A1, Figure A2, Figure A3 and Figure A4 in Appendix A, considering the coherence of the reading. In the unimodal function F1, only the BWSMA and SMA-AGM are able to converge quickly, while the other two variants and the basic SMA stagnate very early and are unable to search further. This indicates that the AGM is able to help the algorithm converge quickly through the greedy mechanism. The convergence accuracy of the BWS and SRM is still higher than that of the basic SMA even though they are unable to search further, due to the fact that both the BWS and SRM are able to expand the search range and jump out of the local optimum. The opposite is true for the multi-peak function F6. The selection mechanism of the AGM makes the SMA easy to fall into the local optimum, while the SRM helps stagnant individuals to restart the search. As can be seen from the curve of the BWSMA, it stagnates in the middle of the process but quickly escapes from the local optimum. This is attributed to the stagnation-lifting effect of the SRM, which enhances the algorithm’s ability to avoid local stagnation by updating the stagnant individuals. For the hybrid functions F12 and F17, the BWSMA is able to converge stably and quickly to a better value, which is attributed to the fact that the AGM helps the BWSMA to converge quickly, and the BWS, with its bootstrapping effect, helps the BWSMA to find promising regions, which improves the algorithm’s convergence speed and accuracy. For the combined functions F22 and F28, the BWSMA stagnates in the middle but quickly continues the search and provides a high convergence accuracy. This is due to the fact that the SRM can reset the stagnant individuals, and the BWS and AGM allow the dominant individuals to accelerate convergence. In summary, the AGM accelerates the convergence of the BWSMA, the BWS enhances the performance of the BWSMA in general, and the SRM helps the BWSMA jump out of the local optimum. In other words, the three improvement strategies proposed in this paper improve the optimization ability of the BWSMA in an all-around way.

4.3. Comparison with SMA Variant Algorithms

In this subsection, we compare the BWSMA with eight SMA variants to illustrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm in this paper. These variants include PSMADE, MSSMA, ESMA, LSMA, AOSMA, EOSMA, ISMA, and DTSMA. Table 3 shows the specific parameters of these selected comparison algorithms. The best values, standard deviations, average values, and rankings obtained by the BWSMA and the eight SMA variants on the CEC2018 test suite are summarized in Table A9, Table A10, Table A11 and Table A12 in Appendix A. The rankings of the BWSMA and SMA variants on each function under the four dimensions are directly depicted in Figure 5. Within Figure 5, the rankings of each algorithm on the different functions enclose a surface, and the smaller the surface area, the better the performance of the algorithm. According to Figure 5, BWSMA has the smallest surface, which means that the overall performance of BWSMA is better than other SMA variants.
Table 4 summarizes the results of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test between the BWSMA and SMA variants, where the symbols “+/=/−” indicate that the BWSMA is superior/similar/inferior to other SMA variants on the CEC2018 test set. According to Table 4, the BWSMA has a clear advantage, with significantly more “+” than “−” and even more than the total number of “−” and “=”. This indicates that the BWSMA has a clear dominance over other SMA variants on the CEC2018 test set. Table 5 presents the Friedman test results for the BWSMA and SMA variants, whose rankings are visualized in Figure 6. Based on the results of Friedman’s test for BWSMA and SMA variants, the BWSMA ranked first among all the algorithms, achieving an average ranking of 1.259. PSMADE and ESMA tied for second place. Overall, there is a significant difference between the BWSMA and the other SMA variants, which is derived from a p-value of less than 0.05. To further quantify the magnitude of the difference between the BWSMA and SMA variants, Nemenyi post hoc tests were performed. In the Nemenyi post hoc test, the critical difference value (CDV) can be calculated based on the number of functions and the number of algorithms [6]. The Nemenyi test assumes that two algorithms with similar performance will be connected by line segments of length CDV and that algorithms with significant gaps will not be connected by line segments between them. Figure 7 visualizes the size of the difference between the BWSMA and SMA variants. As shown in Figure 7, there are significant differences between the BWSMA and MSSMA, ESMA, LSMA, AOSMA, EOSMA, ISMA, and DTSMA on the 10D, 30D, and 50D CEC2018 test sets. On 100D, there is no significant difference between the performance of the BWSMA and PSMADE or ESMA, but it is significantly better than the MSSMA, LSMA, AOSMA, EOSMA, ISMA, and DTSMA.
In conclusion, the proposed BWSMA is a high-performing SMA variant with strong optimization effects in comparison with other SMA variants.

4.4. Comparison with Other Advanced Improved Algorithms

For this subsection, eight other advanced improved algorithms are selected as comparison algorithms and are fully compared with the BWSMA on the CEC2022 test suite. These algorithms include the NMPA, BEESO, FDBARO, WOSSA, PHISAO, ESLPSO, EPSCA, and IGWO, whose corresponding parameter settings are displayed in Table 6. The NMPA is a variant of the marine predator algorithm that introduces nonlinear control parameters. BEESO is an improved snake optimizer that combines elite backward learning and two-way search. FDBARO is a variant of the artificial rabbit optimizer that incorporates a fitness distance balancing strategy. WOSSA is an improved sparrow search algorithm that brings together an adaptive weight jumping mechanism and a suicide variant perturbation. PHISAO enhances the performance of the snow ablation optimizer by introducing multiple swarm iteration strategies and Cauchy mutation perturbations. ESLPSO introduces nonlinear control coefficients and interactive learning mechanisms to enhance the performance of social learning Particle Swarm Optimization. EPSCA is a modified sine–cosine algorithm that combines an elite pooling strategy and a pattern search approach. IGWO introduces a dimensional learning strategy to enhance the global search capability of the Gray Wolf Optimizer.
Table A13 and Table A14 in Appendix A show the average values, best values, standard deviations, and ranks of the BWSMA and the other improved algorithms on the CEC2022 test set. Similarly, radar charts are utilized to visualize the rankings of the BWSMA and the comparison algorithms on the CEC2022 test set, as shown in Figure 8.
The BWSMA performs the best overall, as seen in Figure 8, where it attains the least surface area. The BWSMA is able to provide the minimum average value for three and seven functions on 10D and 20, respectively. In contrast, the other improved algorithms ranked first on at most one function. Table 7 lists the results of the statistical tests for BWSMA and the improved algorithms. According to the Friedman test results in Table 7, the p-value of both dimensions is less than 0.05, which means that there is a significant difference between the BWSMA and the improved algorithms on the CEC2022 test set. Specifically, the BWSMA received Friedman scores of 2.583 at 10D and 1.833 at 20D. The AOSMA, which came in second, had scores of 4.333 and 3.917. Overall, the BWSMA was the best overall performer, although it had an average performance on 10D, with only three functions in first place. In conjunction with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test in Table 7, the BWSMA receives more “+” than “−”, indicating that it can achieve significantly better results in most functions.
Box plots can reflect the stability of the algorithms. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show box plots of the BWSMA and improved algorithms solving problems of different dimensions of the CEC2022 test set. Box plots are used to show the performance distribution of multiple algorithms over different test functions and multiple runs. Each box represents the statistical distribution of an algorithm, including the median value (center line), upper and lower quartiles (top and bottom edges of the box), maximum and minimum values (whiskers), and possible outliers (points). According to the results shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10, in most cases, the box plots of the BWSMA table contain a lower median and box, narrower box heights, and fewer outliers, which indicates that the BWSMA has higher stability and convergence accuracy compared to the other eight improved algorithms. Overall, the BWSMA provides an acceptable and favorable solution in terms of the balance between exploitation and utilization, indicating that it has the potential to address real-world applications. In summary, the BWSMA has excellent search capability on the CEC2022 test set, and even when compared with other state-of-the-art improved algorithms, it still has excellent performance, showing significant search accuracy and robustness.

5. Experiments Using Real-World Engineering Problems

In this section, we apply the BWSMA to engineering constrained-optimization problems to verify its potential for solving real-world optimization problems. To assess the utility and scalability of the algorithm, we apply it to two typical real-world engineering problems. The comparison algorithms include the basic ECO algorithm and the top three algorithms other than the BWSMA in both test sets.

5.1. Tension/Compression Spring Design Problem

This design problem aims to minimize the weight of a stretch/compression spring by finding three crucial parameters of the spring, including wire diameter (d), coil diameter (D), and the number of coils (N). The structure of this engineering problem is illustrated in Figure 11, and the mathematical model can be found in the literature [87]. The optimization results of the BWSMA and seven different algorithms on the tension/compression spring design structure are given in Table 8. From the table, it can be seen that the optimization results of the BWSMA are better than the other compared algorithms, and the optimal value obtained is 1.27E−02.

5.2. Pressure Vessel Design Problem

Figure 12 depicts the pressure vessel design problem. The objective is to minimize total cost while satisfying operational constraints, with decision variables comprising shell thickness (Ts), head thickness (Th), inner radius (R), and head length (L); the corresponding mathematical formulation is given in the literature [88]. From the results in Table 9, it is evident that the BWSMA’s optimal value surpasses all other competitors, achieving a minimum cost of 5.89E+03.

6. Conclusions

This paper is dedicated to addressing the shortcomings of the SMA and proposes an SMA variant, the BWSMA, by combining three improvement mechanisms. The AGM strategy improves the convergence speed and accuracy of the SMA. The BWS directs the SMA to search towards promising regions and improves its search capability. The SRM prevents the population from falling into a local optimum by updating stagnant individuals. To verify the performance of the BWSMA, this paper conducts comprehensive experiments on the CEC2018 test set, CEC2022 test set, and engineering constrained-optimization problems. Ablation experiments confirm that the three improvement strategies can enhance the performance of the SMA individually and further strengthen the SMA when combined. Comparison results with eight SMA variants indicate that the proposed BWSMA is an excellent SMA variant with strong optimization capabilities. Comparison results with eight state-of-the-art improved algorithms indicate that the BWSMA is a promising metaheuristic algorithm variant. In conclusion, the improvement strategies proposed in this paper distinctly enhance the performance of the basic SMA and alleviate its limitations. However, it cannot be denied that it still has shortcomings. The BWS strategy is extremely dependent on the quality of dominant populations and is difficult to accurately fit the evolutionary direction when the number of populations is small. The execution frequency of the introduced SRM mechanism needs to be further investigated, and indicators that better reflect the stagnation situation need to be studied. Finally, we only examined the performance of the BWSMA on test functions, and its scalability and adaptability need to be tested in more optimization scenarios.
We will consider the following aspects in our future work: First, we will examine the performance of the BWSMA on other optimization domains such as optimal power flow optimization, medical image segmentation, and UAV mission planning. Second, we will develop a multi-objective version of the BWSMA to solve complex multi-objective optimization problems in the real world such as model calibration problems [89]. Thirdly, we will try to modify the structure of the BWSMA to make it suitable for real-time optimization problems. Finally, We will apply the BWSMA to optimize the hyperparameters of various machine learning methods to address a wider range of applications. For example, it can be combined with the CNN for system monitoring [90], with the random forest approach for motion recognition [91], with the LSTM for energy system management [92], and with the feed-forward neural network for electronic detection [93].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L., H.M. and Z.L.; Data curation, D.W. and Y.S.; Formal analysis, T.L.; Funding acquisition, Z.L.; Investigation, H.M. and B.F.; Methodology, T.L. and H.M.; Project administration, Z.L.; Resources, D.W. and B.F.; Software, T.L.; Supervision, Z.L.; Validation, H.M. and D.W.; Visualization, D.W. and B.F.; Writing—original draft, T.L. and H.M.; Writing—review and editing, T.L., H.M., Y.S. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded through A Project Supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department, grant number Y202352110.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are provided within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors and the reviewers for their useful feedback that improved this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. CEC-2018 test functions.
Table A1. CEC-2018 test functions.
TypeIDFunction Namesfmin
Unimodal functionsF1Shifted and Rotated Bent Cigar Function100
F2Shifted and Rotated Zakharov Function300
Multimodal functionsF3Shifted and Rotated Rosenbrock Function400
F4Shifted and Rotated Rastrigin Function500
F5Shifted and Rotated Expanded Scaffer Function600
F6Shifted and Rotated Lunacek Bi_Rastrigin Function700
F7Shifted and Rotated Non-Continuous Rastrigin Function800
F8Shifted and Rotated Levy Function900
F9Shifted and Rotated Schwefel Function1000
Hybrid functionsF10Hybrid Function 1 (N = 3)1100
F11Hybrid Function 2 (N = 3)1200
F12Hybrid Function 3 (N = 3)1300
F13Hybrid Function 4 (N = 4)1400
F14Hybrid Function 5 (N = 4)1500
F15Hybrid Function 6 (N = 4)1600
F16Hybrid Function 6 (N = 5)1700
F17Hybrid Function 6 (N = 5)1800
F18Hybrid Function 6 (N = 5)1900
F19Hybrid Function 6 (N = 6)2000
Composition functionsF20Composition Function 1 (N = 3)2100
F21Composition Function 2 (N = 3)2200
F22Composition Function 3 (N = 4)2300
F23Composition Function 4 (N = 4)2400
F24Composition Function 5 (N = 5)2500
F25Composition Function 6 (N = 5)2600
F26Composition Function 7 (N = 6)2700
F27Composition Function 8 (N = 6)2800
F28Composition Function 9 (N = 3)2900
F29Composition Function 10 (N = 3)3000
Search range: [ 100 , 100 ] D ; dimension: 10/30/50/100
Table A2. CEC-2022 test functions.
Table A2. CEC-2022 test functions.
TypeIDFunction Namesfmin
Unimodal functionsF1Shifted and Fully Rotated Zakharov Function300
Basic functionsF2Shifted and Fully Rotated Rosenbrock Function400
F3Shifted and Fully Rotated Expanded Schaffer f6 Function600
F4Shifted and Fully Rotated Non-Continuous Rastrigin Function800
F5Shifted and Fully Rotated Levy Function900
Hybrid functionsF6Hybrid Function 1 (N = 3)1800
F7Hybrid Function 2 (N = 6)2000
F8Hybrid Function 3 (N = 5)2200
Composition functionsF9Composition Function 1 (N = 5)2300
F10Composition Function 2 (N = 4)2400
F11Composition Function 3 (N = 5)2600
F12Composition Function 4 (N = 6)2700
Search range: [ 100 , 100 ] D ; dimension: 10/20
Table A3. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (10D).
Table A3. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (10D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best2.9078E+022.3390E+021.0245E+021.2021E+021.1525E+02
Mean7.4836E+036.3910E+031.8703E+036.5469E+039.2922E+02
Std3.9141E+034.2793E+032.2628E+034.1223E+037.5662E+02
Rank53241
F2Best3.0001E+023.0000E+023.0000E+023.0011E+023.0000E+02
Mean3.0032E+023.0014E+023.0000E+023.0829E+023.0000E+02
Std1.0550E+004.8729E−011.5517E−032.2793E+011.6833E−03
Rank43152
F3Best4.0003E+024.0333E+024.0183E+024.0161E+024.0080E+02
Mean4.2346E+024.1423E+024.0390E+024.0590E+024.0420E+02
Std3.2502E+012.3375E+019.1994E−011.3105E+001.1763E+00
Rank54132
F4Best5.0796E+025.0798E+025.0199E+025.0601E+025.0299E+02
Mean5.1866E+025.1946E+025.0891E+025.1451E+025.0914E+02
Std6.7608E+006.7990E+003.7954E+004.7381E+003.7821E+00
Rank45132
F5Best6.0007E+026.0006E+026.0002E+026.0031E+026.0000E+02
Mean6.0020E+026.0013E+026.0007E+026.0053E+026.0002E+02
Std9.8348E−025.2644E−023.7069E−021.1395E−012.4785E−02
Rank43251
F6Best7.1335E+027.1531E+027.1290E+027.1495E+027.1320E+02
Mean7.3131E+027.2762E+027.2190E+027.2575E+027.1869E+02
Std7.0581E+008.4738E+005.4214E+006.9353E+003.2076E+00
Rank54231
F7Best8.0797E+028.1095E+028.0398E+028.0408E+028.0199E+02
Mean8.2081E+028.1907E+028.0978E+028.1294E+028.0876E+02
Std9.4009E+006.6306E+004.8539E+004.4410E+003.7990E+00
Rank54231
F8Best9.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0007E+029.0000E+02
Mean9.0158E+029.0002E+029.0000E+029.0058E+029.0000E+02
Std8.1711E+008.3933E−023.3970E−048.2944E−011.6351E−02
Rank53142
F9Best1.1536E+031.1519E+031.0184E+031.2391E+031.0103E+03
Mean1.7081E+031.6321E+031.5912E+031.5147E+031.3616E+03
Std2.6147E+022.4561E+022.9097E+021.6400E+022.1647E+02
Rank54321
F10Best1.1082E+031.1050E+031.1012E+031.1014E+031.1003E+03
Mean1.1856E+031.1527E+031.1058E+031.1162E+031.1033E+03
Std9.7782E+018.1399E+013.3022E+003.5314E+011.4183E+00
Rank54231
F11Best4.2818E+036.1369E+031.4034E+034.1131E+031.3188E+03
Mean4.2123E+051.3325E+052.7181E+033.1455E+044.7612E+03
Std4.8182E+051.7798E+052.5264E+032.8147E+048.4062E+03
Rank54132
F12Best1.5841E+031.4169E+031.3076E+031.3290E+031.3032E+03
Mean1.4465E+041.6476E+041.3615E+032.6220E+031.3120E+03
Std1.3384E+041.3989E+045.7105E+015.6582E+035.8979E+00
Rank45231
F13Best1.4418E+031.4257E+031.4011E+031.4021E+031.4000E+03
Mean2.8325E+032.1846E+031.4207E+031.4262E+031.4056E+03
Std3.3727E+031.5898E+031.0147E+011.1132E+018.0927E+00
Rank54231
F14Best1.6070E+031.5256E+031.5004E+031.5047E+031.5002E+03
Mean8.8600E+035.2274E+031.5105E+031.5178E+031.5047E+03
Std8.0006E+033.5730E+038.9122E+001.4698E+014.8891E+00
Rank54231
F15Best1.6019E+031.6011E+031.6007E+031.6006E+031.6005E+03
Mean1.6925E+031.6652E+031.6496E+031.6682E+031.6129E+03
Std9.0755E+017.8251E+016.2346E+017.9888E+012.4387E+01
Rank53241
F16Best1.7041E+031.7058E+031.7013E+031.7044E+031.7006E+03
Mean1.7650E+031.7532E+031.7325E+031.7385E+031.7175E+03
Std4.5648E+013.7474E+011.8951E+013.0971E+011.2925E+01
Rank54231
F17Best2.0563E+032.6257E+031.8052E+031.8894E+031.8004E+03
Mean2.7812E+042.6028E+041.8495E+033.0227E+031.8089E+03
Std1.6829E+041.6538E+043.2728E+013.3024E+039.1926E+00
Rank54231
F18Best1.9841E+031.9047E+031.9016E+031.9046E+031.9001E+03
Mean9.8627E+031.3235E+041.9042E+031.9302E+031.9014E+03
Std1.1726E+041.1654E+041.9151E+008.1168E+011.4326E+00
Rank45231
F19Best2.0051E+032.0013E+032.0052E+032.0020E+032.0000E+03
Mean2.0412E+032.0290E+032.0308E+032.0216E+032.0092E+03
Std3.8578E+012.7652E+011.7035E+011.2174E+011.0646E+01
Rank53421
F20Best2.2036E+032.2035E+032.2000E+032.2004E+032.2000E+03
Mean2.3243E+032.3130E+032.3025E+032.3030E+032.2951E+03
Std3.4698E+013.7861E+013.4847E+013.4904E+013.7582E+01
Rank54231
F21Best2.3003E+032.3009E+032.3000E+032.3006E+032.3000E+03
Mean2.3025E+032.3025E+032.3005E+032.3023E+032.3001E+03
Std1.0934E+001.0926E+005.2637E−017.6575E−011.7247E−01
Rank45231
F22Best2.6130E+032.6085E+032.6057E+032.6079E+032.6031E+03
Mean2.6250E+032.6221E+032.6129E+032.6156E+032.6119E+03
Std9.4900E+001.0863E+014.7006E+004.9025E+005.0350E+00
Rank54231
F23Best2.7402E+032.7380E+032.7338E+032.5005E+032.7317E+03
Mean2.7589E+032.7589E+032.7419E+032.7303E+032.7390E+03
Std1.0265E+011.1263E+015.5527E+006.3099E+013.9986E+00
Rank45312
F24Best2.8978E+032.8981E+032.8977E+032.8988E+032.8977E+03
Mean2.9406E+032.9416E+032.9242E+032.9316E+032.9273E+03
Std2.9959E+013.0670E+012.3225E+012.1735E+012.2583E+01
Rank45132
F25Best2.9000E+032.9000E+032.9000E+032.8012E+032.9000E+03
Mean3.1154E+033.1197E+032.9442E+032.9292E+032.9032E+03
Std3.8076E+023.7496E+022.1558E+025.5831E+011.1957E+01
Rank45321
F26Best3.0894E+033.0890E+033.0890E+033.0891E+033.0890E+03
Mean3.0929E+033.0931E+033.0913E+033.0929E+033.0901E+03
Std2.1748E+001.1053E+012.3887E+001.0979E+011.6432E+00
Rank35241
F27Best3.1683E+033.1664E+033.1000E+033.1006E+033.1000E+03
Mean3.3597E+033.3624E+033.2496E+033.3353E+033.2457E+03
Std9.0449E+011.2272E+021.4723E+021.4384E+021.4244E+02
Rank45231
F28Best3.1343E+033.1390E+033.1340E+033.1332E+033.1293E+03
Mean3.2208E+033.2095E+033.1617E+033.1590E+033.1404E+03
Std5.8366E+016.1415E+012.2570E+012.9912E+011.0094E+01
Rank54321
F29Best5.0776E+035.0063E+033.4551E+033.5590E+033.4600E+03
Mean2.6296E+052.2230E+053.8716E+052.5546E+052.3768E+05
Std5.4917E+053.9322E+056.5107E+054.3565E+054.4337E+05
Rank41532
Table A4. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (30D).
Table A4. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (30D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best6.7439E+042.2583E+034.9028E+058.1515E+061.0241E+02
Mean2.4405E+051.2736E+042.6764E+061.1298E+083.5430E+03
Std8.1541E+047.5806E+032.7402E+061.7839E+084.2661E+03
Rank32451
F2Best1.0042E+047.9119E+037.6985E+031.5447E+043.0103E+02
Mean3.5881E+042.5994E+041.6212E+042.6238E+043.5108E+02
Std1.7853E+041.4161E+044.9023E+037.7037E+036.5321E+01
Rank53241
F3Best4.7441E+024.8884E+024.7047E+024.9769E+024.4193E+02
Mean5.1237E+025.0324E+025.0524E+025.4154E+024.9308E+02
Std2.2657E+011.4880E+011.4709E+013.2096E+011.6638E+01
Rank42351
F4Best5.7881E+025.6331E+025.3329E+025.4712E+025.2105E+02
Mean6.3539E+026.2221E+025.5484E+025.8731E+025.3446E+02
Std3.3258E+013.0961E+011.5583E+012.4522E+019.8776E+00
Rank54231
F5Best6.0579E+026.0344E+026.0233E+026.0505E+026.0009E+02
Mean6.1431E+026.0810E+026.0412E+026.0824E+026.0027E+02
Std7.2943E+003.0892E+001.2551E+002.4450E+007.7242E−02
Rank53241
F6Best8.3024E+027.8920E+027.7601E+028.1046E+027.4556E+02
Mean8.8021E+028.5414E+028.0362E+028.5700E+027.6442E+02
Std3.4858E+012.7198E+011.9829E+012.6410E+011.0946E+01
Rank53241
F7Best8.7241E+028.7087E+028.2314E+028.4859E+028.1328E+02
Mean9.2778E+029.1591E+028.5478E+028.8223E+028.3911E+02
Std3.2725E+011.8425E+012.0200E+011.7381E+011.3461E+01
Rank54231
F8Best1.9032E+032.1906E+039.1052E+021.2682E+039.0020E+02
Mean4.5906E+034.6876E+031.0079E+031.7800E+039.0142E+02
Std1.7384E+031.6363E+039.6028E+013.3481E+021.3383E+00
Rank45231
F9Best3.8548E+032.8270E+033.3534E+033.7028E+033.1575E+03
Mean4.8157E+034.5420E+034.8611E+035.2112E+034.2796E+03
Std6.7942E+026.5535E+027.8089E+027.7753E+026.4497E+02
Rank32451
F10Best1.1741E+031.1575E+031.1791E+031.2160E+031.1099E+03
Mean1.2840E+031.2960E+031.2540E+031.3077E+031.1536E+03
Std5.4767E+017.2220E+013.7576E+015.4904E+013.6894E+01
Rank34251
F11Best4.0758E+057.5587E+052.5154E+055.7373E+058.5647E+03
Mean5.5961E+064.5173E+061.5020E+066.9770E+063.0646E+04
Std4.0940E+062.2622E+069.5901E+056.6525E+062.4784E+04
Rank43251
F12Best1.6956E+047.7280E+032.5008E+046.0632E+031.7429E+03
Mean7.0258E+043.3481E+048.7179E+043.4719E+043.1906E+03
Std4.3349E+042.5973E+043.7536E+042.6800E+049.1225E+02
Rank42531
F13Best1.4183E+041.0933E+041.6185E+031.7703E+031.4351E+03
Mean2.5014E+052.2363E+051.8672E+033.2151E+031.4590E+03
Std2.4023E+053.0665E+051.7197E+022.3679E+031.5078E+01
Rank54231
F14Best3.0093E+031.8594E+031.1059E+041.7432E+031.5974E+03
Mean2.1864E+042.1082E+042.3565E+041.9586E+041.7426E+03
Std1.5677E+041.4954E+048.3826E+031.3128E+041.0656E+02
Rank43521
F15Best1.9580E+032.0555E+031.7183E+031.9136E+031.6057E+03
Mean2.6839E+032.7636E+032.3378E+032.4408E+032.0826E+03
Std3.6369E+023.4355E+022.5910E+023.0942E+022.6252E+02
Rank45231
F16Best1.9746E+031.8326E+031.8112E+031.8375E+031.7596E+03
Mean2.3855E+032.4637E+031.9918E+032.0960E+031.8777E+03
Std2.5220E+022.4793E+021.5646E+021.6796E+021.0153E+02
Rank45231
F17Best3.2769E+052.8243E+051.8212E+043.6418E+041.8850E+03
Mean3.3322E+063.7023E+064.2271E+041.1091E+051.9892E+03
Std3.1667E+064.0584E+061.5571E+045.5042E+046.9781E+01
Rank45231
F18Best2.1864E+031.9710E+034.0974E+032.3077E+031.9250E+03
Mean2.5775E+042.7607E+041.4770E+041.8624E+041.9746E+03
Std2.0354E+042.1064E+041.1098E+041.6668E+043.3756E+01
Rank45231
F19Best2.1610E+032.1569E+032.0953E+032.1121E+032.0303E+03
Mean2.5883E+032.5468E+032.3834E+032.4202E+032.1999E+03
Std2.1724E+021.9929E+022.0607E+022.0190E+021.3211E+02
Rank54231
F20Best2.3699E+032.3803E+032.3295E+032.3467E+032.3225E+03
Mean2.4379E+032.4263E+032.3488E+032.3858E+032.3367E+03
Std3.4957E+013.5131E+011.5744E+011.7120E+011.1600E+01
Rank54231
F21Best2.3108E+032.3032E+032.3125E+032.3339E+032.3003E+03
Mean5.8679E+035.8762E+034.4677E+033.4421E+034.1865E+03
Std1.2259E+031.2585E+032.0297E+031.7667E+031.6751E+03
Rank45312
F22Best2.6957E+032.7103E+032.6748E+032.6895E+032.6735E+03
Mean2.7660E+032.7685E+032.7095E+032.7309E+032.6919E+03
Std2.9491E+012.8247E+011.8177E+011.9791E+011.0484E+01
Rank45231
F23Best2.8912E+032.8694E+032.8479E+032.8718E+032.8324E+03
Mean2.9398E+032.9336E+032.8774E+032.9033E+032.8571E+03
Std3.1492E+013.1571E+011.7062E+011.8967E+011.4884E+01
Rank54231
F24Best2.8847E+032.8879E+032.8881E+032.8919E+032.8870E+03
Mean2.8982E+032.9016E+032.8999E+032.9293E+032.8907E+03
Std1.5124E+011.6760E+011.1381E+012.2353E+011.0557E+01
Rank24351
F25Best2.9036E+032.9013E+032.9778E+034.2425E+032.9014E+03
Mean4.9419E+034.9095E+034.1956E+034.7110E+033.9298E+03
Std7.0619E+027.6065E+024.2475E+022.2883E+022.3423E+02
Rank54231
F26Best3.1938E+033.2003E+033.2034E+033.1976E+033.1903E+03
Mean3.2339E+033.2289E+033.2294E+033.2333E+033.2092E+03
Std2.0646E+011.5779E+011.4262E+011.7641E+011.1246E+01
Rank52341
F27Best3.2140E+033.2174E+033.2142E+033.2339E+033.1515E+03
Mean3.2620E+033.2594E+033.2581E+033.3855E+033.2208E+03
Std3.4961E+012.7856E+012.3479E+013.4102E+022.4966E+01
Rank43251
F28Best3.5903E+033.4780E+033.3788E+033.4418E+033.3168E+03
Mean4.0404E+033.9055E+033.7829E+033.7757E+033.4787E+03
Std2.5825E+022.7004E+022.0724E+021.8634E+021.1094E+02
Rank54321
F29Best3.6004E+048.4586E+031.7874E+041.2280E+046.5387E+03
Mean1.0546E+052.8231E+048.7860E+041.0773E+059.2945E+03
Std1.0724E+051.6547E+047.2305E+041.0449E+051.9576E+03
Rank42351
Table A5. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (50D).
Table A5. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (50D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best8.2183E+062.8479E+055.9760E+051.1623E+072.2080E+04
Mean1.2856E+077.2394E+054.4184E+067.7525E+072.7179E+05
Std4.6592E+062.9207E+052.7647E+068.9826E+075.6314E+05
Rank42351
F2Best1.2020E+057.0953E+041.5401E+042.0020E+045.1564E+03
Mean1.8519E+051.4168E+053.1745E+043.2316E+041.0326E+04
Std7.5353E+045.4006E+049.5936E+039.1631E+033.8925E+03
Rank54231
F3Best4.6962E+025.0681E+025.4087E+024.8423E+025.0326E+02
Mean6.0014E+026.1961E+026.0212E+026.1931E+025.5899E+02
Std5.6401E+015.9190E+012.9190E+014.7603E+014.3939E+01
Rank25341
F4Best7.3706E+027.0206E+025.4738E+026.2767E+025.4801E+02
Mean7.8933E+027.7741E+025.8949E+026.6198E+025.7606E+02
Std3.4825E+015.0289E+012.6423E+012.2716E+011.7387E+01
Rank54231
F5Best6.2216E+026.1673E+026.0303E+026.0772E+026.0112E+02
Mean6.4172E+026.3936E+026.0518E+026.1033E+026.0182E+02
Std1.5086E+011.3841E+011.4292E+002.3668E+005.9044E−01
Rank54231
F6Best9.7074E+029.6898E+028.1512E+028.9816E+027.9464E+02
Mean1.0838E+031.0650E+038.5568E+029.6941E+028.3589E+02
Std6.2668E+014.9898E+012.0298E+014.7288E+011.8005E+01
Rank54231
F7Best1.0177E+039.8811E+028.7311E+029.0091E+028.5654E+02
Mean1.1196E+031.0552E+038.9317E+029.5757E+028.8566E+02
Std6.1274E+014.2631E+011.3360E+013.5032E+011.7938E+01
Rank54231
F8Best9.6214E+038.5137E+039.4608E+021.2156E+039.1860E+02
Mean1.7114E+041.5143E+041.1975E+032.4407E+031.0031E+03
Std4.5611E+033.5521E+031.9382E+026.4226E+027.9316E+01
Rank54231
F9Best5.5925E+036.0820E+035.5637E+037.5996E+035.4488E+03
Mean8.0296E+037.3215E+037.9025E+039.0716E+036.7879E+03
Std1.2121E+036.9510E+021.1477E+039.9591E+029.5459E+02
Rank42351
F10Best1.3516E+031.3371E+031.2537E+031.3450E+031.1790E+03
Mean1.4461E+031.4262E+031.3369E+031.4497E+031.2767E+03
Std4.8539E+018.2728E+014.5767E+014.5519E+015.1713E+01
Rank43251
F11Best8.2005E+067.6849E+062.6098E+063.1245E+061.7229E+05
Mean3.7223E+073.1027E+075.6827E+062.6682E+071.4553E+06
Std2.6893E+071.7743E+072.8291E+062.6057E+071.6432E+06
Rank54231
F12Best4.6341E+042.2802E+041.8597E+044.7165E+039.5964E+03
Mean1.5881E+055.9807E+045.3175E+042.5774E+042.0906E+04
Std9.3827E+042.2093E+042.6815E+041.5847E+045.8453E+03
Rank54321
F13Best1.5568E+051.3038E+052.0134E+031.8294E+031.5925E+03
Mean1.0541E+066.6633E+052.2200E+032.7247E+031.6316E+03
Std7.8127E+054.3652E+051.6232E+025.3196E+024.5953E+01
Rank54231
F14Best7.9972E+035.8670E+031.0982E+041.8788E+032.3777E+03
Mean4.0842E+042.2011E+042.2232E+042.1569E+043.0764E+03
Std2.6657E+041.0955E+048.8148E+031.3590E+044.9527E+02
Rank53421
F15Best2.9519E+033.0565E+032.3151E+032.5691E+032.1960E+03
Mean3.7503E+033.6921E+032.9145E+032.9431E+032.8367E+03
Std4.2168E+024.7714E+023.1752E+022.2359E+023.6862E+02
Rank54231
F16Best2.8413E+032.9096E+032.1692E+032.2362E+032.3598E+03
Mean3.3775E+033.3524E+032.6178E+032.8262E+032.6411E+03
Std3.3740E+023.1984E+022.9819E+022.1980E+021.6929E+02
Rank54132
F17Best3.5370E+051.4022E+061.9531E+044.1169E+042.5336E+03
Mean8.5300E+066.1442E+063.8483E+047.9007E+044.7529E+03
Std7.0700E+063.8511E+061.2048E+042.1625E+042.4743E+03
Rank54231
F18Best5.1009E+032.6364E+032.9996E+032.2017E+032.0305E+03
Mean1.9546E+041.1189E+041.2251E+041.1914E+042.3563E+03
Std1.6310E+041.2189E+049.5490E+031.1647E+045.1207E+02
Rank52431
F19Best2.6298E+032.6451E+032.1832E+032.5961E+032.2358E+03
Mean3.2557E+033.3260E+032.8912E+033.0051E+032.6872E+03
Std3.7625E+023.0929E+023.3499E+022.5498E+023.3124E+02
Rank45231
F20Best2.4890E+032.5074E+032.3384E+032.4002E+032.3525E+03
Mean2.5799E+032.5613E+032.3761E+032.4459E+032.3787E+03
Std5.5410E+015.9196E+012.0881E+012.1252E+011.8977E+01
Rank54132
F21Best7.1981E+037.3031E+037.1930E+038.7972E+036.6908E+03
Mean9.2642E+038.9452E+039.1413E+031.0288E+048.3897E+03
Std9.5940E+021.1444E+031.1486E+036.8626E+021.1551E+03
Rank42351
F22Best2.9641E+032.9102E+032.7806E+032.8353E+032.7757E+03
Mean3.0372E+033.0222E+032.8229E+032.8882E+032.8072E+03
Std5.8050E+017.1554E+012.5725E+013.3025E+011.7922E+01
Rank54231
F23Best3.0653E+033.0887E+032.9609E+032.9849E+032.9318E+03
Mean3.1665E+033.1582E+032.9776E+033.0289E+032.9672E+03
Std5.6220E+018.2456E+011.7550E+012.2846E+012.0565E+01
Rank54231
F24Best3.0647E+033.0100E+033.0291E+033.0625E+032.9855E+03
Mean3.1140E+033.0660E+033.0507E+033.1225E+033.0392E+03
Std3.2669E+013.5213E+011.8340E+015.2224E+012.4640E+01
Rank43251
F25Best2.9544E+033.2925E+034.0930E+034.6883E+034.2395E+03
Mean5.7661E+036.2563E+034.5688E+035.2760E+034.5684E+03
Std2.3239E+031.2044E+032.2997E+023.5387E+022.6927E+02
Rank45231
F26Best3.3376E+033.3883E+033.2843E+033.3181E+033.2423E+03
Mean3.5268E+033.4819E+033.3522E+033.4269E+033.3114E+03
Std1.1761E+027.2070E+015.6175E+016.7091E+016.3983E+01
Rank54231
F27Best3.3225E+033.3053E+033.2628E+033.3349E+033.2625E+03
Mean3.3769E+033.3716E+033.3194E+033.5799E+033.2966E+03
Std4.6650E+015.3085E+013.6726E+012.5394E+022.4399E+01
Rank43251
F28Best4.5063E+034.0633E+033.4389E+033.5108E+033.6198E+03
Mean5.0444E+034.8017E+034.1870E+034.1645E+033.9003E+03
Std3.0683E+024.0681E+023.2938E+022.8621E+021.8966E+02
Rank54321
F29Best5.2654E+061.4821E+062.1609E+061.1233E+061.5738E+06
Mean9.3141E+063.2614E+063.7768E+064.0330E+062.2526E+06
Std3.0736E+061.2900E+061.3681E+062.7910E+064.1165E+05
Rank52341
Table A6. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (100D).
Table A6. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2018 (100D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best2.9335E+086.1175E+073.3174E+082.7694E+097.0450E+07
Mean6.1449E+081.0262E+087.4634E+086.7584E+091.9438E+08
Std1.4285E+083.3841E+072.7285E+083.3645E+095.6174E+07
Rank31452
F2Best3.6324E+052.9355E+052.6784E+051.7191E+051.3985E+05
Mean9.3939E+056.9383E+053.0176E+052.2057E+051.5957E+05
Std2.4631E+053.3450E+052.6071E+042.5909E+041.8424E+04
Rank54321
F3Best9.2617E+027.5527E+028.4046E+021.0052E+037.6371E+02
Mean1.0117E+038.7867E+029.7985E+021.2733E+038.5964E+02
Std5.9868E+015.7837E+017.6284E+011.5521E+025.7241E+01
Rank42351
F4Best1.2153E+031.1507E+037.7038E+029.4583E+027.2204E+02
Mean1.3500E+031.2694E+038.7054E+021.0297E+038.0471E+02
Std1.0779E+026.9625E+015.1830E+015.0712E+013.7713E+01
Rank54231
F5Best6.4928E+026.4046E+026.2356E+026.2225E+026.1293E+02
Mean6.6278E+026.5564E+026.2800E+026.3251E+026.1802E+02
Std6.4471E+007.6191E+002.5103E+005.0945E+003.4028E+00
Rank54231
F6Best1.9039E+031.8034E+031.3258E+031.5294E+031.2112E+03
Mean2.1697E+032.0658E+031.5129E+031.7287E+031.3253E+03
Std1.8561E+021.9328E+028.0094E+011.0803E+026.2628E+01
Rank54231
F7Best1.5448E+031.4227E+031.1313E+031.2214E+031.0353E+03
Mean1.6851E+031.5787E+031.1874E+031.3127E+031.0991E+03
Std8.2218E+019.9907E+014.0329E+016.8417E+013.7806E+01
Rank54231
F8Best3.3315E+042.7073E+045.9457E+039.0112E+033.8381E+03
Mean3.9850E+043.4222E+048.2614E+032.2512E+046.0605E+03
Std4.0371E+034.9529E+031.3150E+037.7692E+032.0907E+03
Rank54231
F9Best1.5562E+041.3387E+041.5699E+041.6224E+041.5098E+04
Mean1.8444E+041.6680E+041.8014E+042.0501E+041.6738E+04
Std1.4215E+031.9066E+031.8078E+032.6631E+031.3312E+03
Rank41352
F10Best1.3188E+041.6800E+041.0084E+043.8439E+033.2800E+03
Mean3.5506E+043.1681E+041.5490E+046.4362E+034.4914E+03
Std1.5518E+041.4828E+042.2524E+032.1344E+038.8862E+02
Rank54321
F11Best1.6072E+087.3803E+079.0859E+072.1048E+084.1783E+07
Mean3.9468E+082.1963E+081.9447E+086.7318E+089.9655E+07
Std1.5571E+081.0086E+087.0554E+073.7604E+084.1968E+07
Rank43251
F12Best1.3116E+054.5573E+046.5328E+042.5624E+044.3968E+04
Mean3.1379E+065.3748E+051.4098E+056.7967E+046.2741E+04
Std1.0416E+071.1832E+065.8255E+046.1766E+041.0634E+04
Rank54321
F13Best2.3864E+061.6864E+061.3525E+056.0192E+046.6748E+03
Mean5.0827E+065.3299E+063.2445E+053.3047E+052.6564E+04
Std2.8888E+064.1994E+061.0532E+051.7111E+052.4931E+04
Rank45231
F14Best6.0233E+043.5023E+045.0827E+044.9362E+031.0864E+04
Mean7.9729E+053.9549E+059.0593E+048.0804E+042.4456E+04
Std2.0219E+066.3747E+053.0032E+042.4914E+059.9346E+03
Rank54321
F15Best4.9391E+035.0057E+034.4450E+034.1776E+034.5656E+03
Mean6.6359E+035.9270E+035.6523E+035.9308E+035.4122E+03
Std8.6079E+025.4788E+025.1037E+028.4544E+025.0119E+02
Rank53241
F16Best4.3427E+034.7909E+034.2258E+033.7957E+033.4256E+03
Mean5.6436E+035.7837E+034.8933E+034.6775E+034.4578E+03
Std6.3468E+026.0216E+024.0687E+024.1494E+025.1992E+02
Rank45321
F17Best4.8225E+063.2832E+063.2128E+053.1771E+053.9945E+04
Mean1.0047E+071.2209E+075.3833E+057.5870E+058.4975E+04
Std5.1570E+064.2439E+061.4655E+053.5742E+052.2609E+04
Rank45231
F18Best1.4745E+051.8794E+042.7676E+044.5420E+036.1620E+03
Mean5.1427E+055.7059E+041.5172E+054.5762E+045.1381E+04
Std3.4018E+056.9333E+048.4132E+048.6485E+046.8858E+04
Rank53412
F19Best4.7325E+034.7012E+034.0084E+033.5119E+034.0953E+03
Mean5.6316E+035.6474E+035.0096E+034.7446E+034.7803E+03
Std6.0655E+024.3625E+025.7107E+025.9582E+024.4110E+02
Rank45312
F20Best3.0111E+033.0150E+032.6000E+032.7235E+032.5563E+03
Mean3.1982E+033.1252E+032.7139E+032.8302E+032.6131E+03
Std1.3199E+029.1378E+015.6976E+014.9585E+014.5271E+01
Rank54231
F21Best1.8213E+041.6996E+041.7409E+041.8614E+041.7145E+04
Mean2.1446E+041.9405E+042.0236E+042.2924E+041.9601E+04
Std1.6005E+031.1228E+031.9280E+032.6962E+031.4572E+03
Rank41352
F22Best3.4530E+033.2757E+033.1496E+033.1483E+033.0796E+03
Mean3.5663E+033.4255E+033.2539E+033.2321E+033.1696E+03
Std7.4896E+017.9695E+016.3334E+015.6727E+014.1180E+01
Rank54321
F23Best4.0054E+033.8992E+033.6334E+033.6694E+033.5192E+03
Mean4.2415E+034.0220E+033.7328E+033.7755E+033.6361E+03
Std1.5605E+028.1787E+015.0837E+016.4949E+014.7330E+01
Rank54231
F24Best3.5860E+033.4276E+033.6184E+033.8896E+033.4140E+03
Mean3.6867E+033.5996E+033.7191E+034.1964E+033.5716E+03
Std8.0200E+019.1593E+017.2304E+012.7611E+027.2742E+01
Rank32451
F25Best5.4651E+031.1827E+049.2849E+039.8766E+038.8280E+03
Mean1.4782E+041.3894E+041.0594E+041.1010E+049.4549E+03
Std2.9616E+031.2148E+035.9529E+026.7521E+024.7181E+02
Rank54231
F26Best3.5984E+033.4979E+033.5013E+033.4836E+033.4289E+03
Mean3.7580E+033.6221E+033.6150E+033.5923E+033.5420E+03
Std8.4152E+016.8361E+017.9835E+018.0731E+015.5613E+01
Rank54321
F27Best3.6185E+033.5844E+033.6672E+034.0497E+033.5928E+03
Mean3.7325E+033.6287E+033.8290E+034.6433E+033.6984E+03
Std7.4455E+013.6295E+011.5112E+025.0183E+027.5370E+01
Rank31452
F28Best6.9713E+036.2396E+036.4695E+035.8348E+035.5167E+03
Mean8.1562E+037.4903E+037.3101E+036.8188E+036.6386E+03
Std6.8176E+028.2938E+026.8984E+024.4825E+026.6864E+02
Rank54321
F29Best2.9704E+066.6771E+052.2302E+061.3346E+063.3834E+05
Mean1.1563E+072.5856E+065.4763E+066.7743E+061.1179E+06
Std5.1551E+061.3197E+062.9529E+064.7646E+067.1226E+05
Rank52341
Table A7. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2022 (10D).
Table A7. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2022 (10D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best3.0000E+023.0000E+023.0000E+023.0006E+023.0000E+02
Mean3.0006E+023.0001E+023.0000E+023.0136E+023.0000E+02
Std6.7015E−021.7061E−025.3818E−041.3789E+001.3704E−03
Rank43152
F2Best4.0026E+024.0628E+024.0001E+024.0028E+024.0002E+02
Mean4.1030E+024.1272E+024.0721E+024.0716E+024.0649E+02
Std1.5297E+011.7776E+012.6036E+002.0174E+002.8829E+00
Rank45321
F3Best6.0009E+026.0008E+026.0003E+026.0024E+026.0000E+02
Mean6.0032E+026.0016E+026.0009E+026.0050E+026.0002E+02
Std4.0248E−015.2959E−022.5504E−021.1786E−011.9725E−02
Rank43251
F4Best8.1294E+028.1194E+028.0199E+028.0506E+028.0298E+02
Mean8.3131E+028.2963E+028.0945E+028.1519E+028.0813E+02
Std1.3203E+011.0735E+015.1254E+006.8395E+003.4574E+00
Rank54231
F5Best9.0001E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0008E+029.0000E+02
Mean9.4552E+029.1954E+029.0003E+029.0104E+029.0001E+02
Std1.2699E+025.5046E+011.1542E−011.6423E+002.2714E−02
Rank54231
F6Best1.8662E+031.9092E+031.8058E+031.8814E+031.8002E+03
Mean4.6717E+034.6491E+031.8529E+033.4391E+031.8130E+03
Std1.9392E+032.0367E+033.1883E+012.0096E+031.1076E+01
Rank54231
F7Best2.0011E+032.0020E+032.0017E+032.0073E+032.0000E+03
Mean2.0197E+032.0198E+032.0224E+032.0215E+032.0163E+03
Std5.7652E+004.7928E+009.0545E+003.5909E+008.6227E+00
Rank23541
F8Best2.2203E+032.2201E+032.2015E+032.2017E+032.2002E+03
Mean2.2213E+032.2213E+032.2204E+032.2193E+032.2138E+03
Std8.2023E−019.3656E−015.6025E+007.1824E+009.4827E+00
Rank54321
F9Best2.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+03
Mean2.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+03
Std1.7370E−037.2037E−045.6549E−041.3252E−021.1269E−04
Rank43251
F10Best2.5002E+032.5003E+032.5002E+032.5004E+032.5002E+03
Mean2.5228E+032.5495E+032.5225E+032.5270E+032.5225E+03
Std5.1515E+016.1680E+014.5112E+014.8908E+014.5283E+01
Rank35241
F11Best2.6001E+032.6000E+032.6000E+032.6006E+032.6000E+03
Mean2.7716E+032.7302E+032.7101E+032.6985E+032.7400E+03
Std1.8946E+021.4058E+021.3610E+021.6760E+021.5222E+02
Rank53214
F12Best2.8597E+032.8596E+032.8594E+032.8614E+032.8594E+03
Mean2.8633E+032.8628E+032.8634E+032.8624E+032.8631E+03
Std1.3500E+001.2611E+001.6675E+001.0167E+001.5168E+00
Rank42513
Table A8. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2022 (20D).
Table A8. Results of ablation experiments with BWSMA based on CEC2022 (20D).
No.IndexSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMA
F1Best3.6330E+023.2140E+023.3457E+027.0865E+023.0007E+02
Mean2.4384E+031.5993E+036.6314E+021.9003E+033.0044E+02
Std1.7939E+031.5122E+033.1066E+021.1377E+032.9651E−01
Rank53241
F2Best4.0651E+024.4494E+024.0614E+024.4543E+024.4490E+02
Mean4.6788E+024.5922E+024.4851E+024.5697E+024.5129E+02
Std4.1839E+012.1495E+011.1992E+012.1808E+017.9738E+00
Rank54132
F3Best6.0080E+026.0062E+026.0073E+026.0159E+026.0004E+02
Mean6.0477E+026.0186E+026.0108E+026.0265E+026.0012E+02
Std4.1965E+001.2873E+002.7204E−018.8362E−014.7548E−02
Rank53241
F4Best8.2696E+028.4387E+028.1111E+028.1434E+028.0996E+02
Mean8.8920E+028.8459E+028.2343E+028.4273E+028.1862E+02
Std3.2891E+012.3304E+018.5538E+001.5012E+017.9788E+00
Rank54231
F5Best1.0131E+031.0384E+039.0018E+029.1043E+029.0000E+02
Mean1.9123E+031.8509E+039.0585E+021.0188E+039.0010E+02
Std7.1176E+027.1082E+024.8808E+009.5581E+011.1172E−01
Rank54231
F6Best2.0474E+032.0387E+033.7582E+032.0255E+031.8632E+03
Mean1.9453E+041.8429E+041.1103E+041.7173E+041.9348E+03
Std7.1187E+038.4444E+034.2549E+037.9368E+036.9540E+01
Rank54231
F7Best2.0264E+032.0256E+032.0269E+032.0277E+032.0024E+03
Mean2.0870E+032.0836E+032.0529E+032.0519E+032.0253E+03
Std4.4533E+013.1829E+011.7438E+012.7550E+017.2348E+00
Rank54321
F8Best2.2237E+032.2215E+032.2235E+032.2235E+032.2082E+03
Mean2.2691E+032.2550E+032.2318E+032.2262E+032.2223E+03
Std4.9492E+014.9085E+012.1404E+011.4406E+002.9836E+00
Rank54321
F9Best2.4808E+032.4808E+032.4808E+032.4810E+032.4808E+03
Mean2.4815E+032.4812E+032.4809E+032.4824E+032.4808E+03
Std9.8731E−014.9868E−016.4140E−021.6644E+001.3075E−02
Rank43251
F10Best2.5006E+032.5007E+032.5004E+032.5006E+032.5003E+03
Mean3.0343E+032.9643E+033.4922E+033.2711E+032.8591E+03
Std3.7503E+022.5676E+029.2910E+025.7995E+023.7931E+02
Rank32541
F11Best2.6056E+032.6016E+032.9023E+032.6857E+032.9001E+03
Mean2.9821E+032.9170E+032.9093E+033.1823E+032.9007E+03
Std1.9050E+021.2221E+023.9249E+003.0207E+023.6095E−01
Rank43251
F12Best2.9383E+032.9377E+032.9361E+032.9401E+032.9320E+03
Mean2.9526E+032.9495E+032.9476E+032.9504E+032.9413E+03
Std1.5183E+011.5834E+019.6213E+001.0136E+017.2332E+00
Rank53241
Table A9. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (10D).
Table A9. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (10D).
No.IndexBWSMAPSMADEMSSMAESMALSMAAOSMAEOSMAISMADTSMA
F1Best1.1525E+021.0000E+021.0480E+023.3766E+021.0106E+022.2654E+021.0409E+051.0047E+021.5864E+02
Mean9.2922E+021.1348E+035.2064E+035.9063E+036.0436E+035.9570E+036.8593E+052.5497E+035.0336E+03
Std7.5662E+022.9113E+033.7387E+034.2704E+034.4007E+034.5631E+037.4809E+052.4183E+033.7765E+03
Rank125687934
F2Best3.0000E+023.0000E+023.0001E+023.0001E+023.0000E+023.0010E+021.3481E+033.0313E+023.0000E+02
Mean3.0000E+024.4092E+023.0185E+023.1096E+023.0044E+023.4406E+023.3211E+033.1842E+023.1303E+02
Std1.6833E−035.0798E+025.5960E+002.6013E+011.0952E+006.4518E+011.3413E+031.7765E+012.6402E+01
Rank183427965
F3Best4.0080E+024.0000E+024.0040E+024.0379E+024.0398E+024.0270E+024.0522E+024.0017E+024.0036E+02
Mean4.0420E+024.0949E+024.1175E+024.1372E+024.1135E+024.1470E+024.0707E+024.1593E+024.1412E+02
Std1.1763E+002.2113E+011.7780E+012.1449E+011.6796E+012.1458E+017.3466E−012.5399E+012.2843E+01
Rank135648297
F4Best5.0299E+025.0497E+025.0882E+025.0796E+025.0597E+025.0703E+025.0713E+025.0995E+025.0597E+02
Mean5.0914E+025.2020E+025.2191E+025.2122E+025.2149E+025.3625E+025.1654E+025.2747E+025.1784E+02
Std3.7821E+008.3928E+008.3356E+007.2438E+009.8673E+001.9161E+014.9419E+001.1378E+016.2010E+00
Rank147569283
F5Best6.0000E+026.0026E+026.0005E+026.0003E+026.0002E+026.0025E+026.0006E+026.0072E+026.0001E+02
Mean6.0002E+026.0052E+026.0062E+026.0014E+026.0048E+026.0911E+026.0044E+026.0696E+026.0022E+02
Std2.4785E−022.7202E−018.6464E−019.7639E−027.3214E−017.3403E+003.1397E−016.0355E+001.6123E−01
Rank167259483
F6Best7.1320E+027.1506E+027.1362E+027.1326E+027.1541E+027.2759E+027.2306E+027.2427E+027.1041E+02
Mean7.1869E+027.3256E+027.4629E+027.3046E+027.2834E+027.5537E+027.3222E+027.5322E+027.2609E+02
Std3.2076E+001.1198E+011.4137E+011.1355E+018.6943E+002.3183E+017.4905E+001.6527E+017.1927E+00
Rank167439582
F7Best8.0199E+028.0995E+028.1194E+028.0995E+028.0597E+028.1194E+028.0580E+028.1194E+028.0597E+02
Mean8.0876E+028.2044E+028.2443E+028.2086E+028.2371E+028.2979E+028.1481E+028.2412E+028.1625E+02
Std3.7990E+007.0319E+006.6665E+008.3917E+001.0377E+011.1545E+015.1266E+006.6350E+006.3880E+00
Rank148569273
F8Best9.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0540E+029.0003E+029.0046E+029.0000E+02
Mean9.0000E+029.0442E+029.5771E+029.0567E+029.0754E+021.1309E+039.0114E+029.7620E+029.0093E+02
Std1.6351E−027.0758E+001.0014E+021.7355E+012.2059E+012.0473E+029.6746E−011.1078E+021.6285E+00
Rank147569382
F9Best1.0103E+031.1389E+031.1451E+031.1465E+031.2050E+031.1431E+031.4580E+031.1286E+031.3532E+03
Mean1.3616E+031.6731E+031.6486E+031.6792E+031.6947E+031.9624E+032.0234E+031.9231E+031.5548E+03
Std2.1647E+022.9115E+022.8148E+023.4063E+022.5951E+023.6337E+022.6822E+023.1313E+021.7767E+02
Rank143568972
F10Best1.1003E+031.1030E+031.1018E+031.1024E+031.1030E+031.1114E+031.1054E+031.1065E+031.1027E+03
Mean1.1033E+031.1299E+031.1141E+031.1629E+031.2100E+031.1842E+031.1161E+031.1556E+031.1116E+03
Std1.4183E+006.2013E+016.7529E+009.1142E+011.0595E+028.7463E+011.0388E+016.5645E+016.6829E+00
Rank153798462
F11Best1.3188E+031.2002E+038.4906E+037.7630E+034.8931E+045.3783E+034.7938E+042.2102E+043.1000E+03
Mean4.7612E+035.5029E+041.1003E+066.4135E+051.8834E+061.8176E+065.2268E+051.5507E+064.8607E+04
Std8.4062E+032.2660E+051.3296E+065.8337E+051.7870E+062.0472E+066.2716E+051.5903E+065.9313E+04
Rank136598472
F12Best1.3032E+031.3032E+031.3407E+031.3118E+032.3084E+032.8489E+032.1155E+032.2187E+031.6455E+03
Mean1.3120E+033.3078E+037.5088E+031.0260E+041.6716E+041.8833E+044.5519E+032.0517E+041.1988E+04
Std5.8979E+005.0804E+038.4492E+031.0485E+041.4565E+041.3517E+041.9597E+031.2549E+041.2255E+04
Rank124578396
F13Best1.4000E+031.4237E+031.4091E+031.4153E+031.4653E+031.4711E+031.4740E+031.4426E+031.4121E+03
Mean1.4056E+031.6827E+031.4652E+036.6774E+032.2495E+033.4047E+031.5324E+031.9548E+032.2008E+03
Std8.0927E+005.3475E+024.1237E+017.5946E+031.2199E+034.0271E+034.2084E+017.4434E+021.3103E+03
Rank142978356
F14Best1.5002E+031.5031E+031.5138E+031.5318E+031.7105E+031.6591E+031.6815E+031.6146E+031.5096E+03
Mean1.5047E+031.8723E+031.6978E+035.9587E+035.8695E+034.9736E+032.2277E+033.4941E+032.2402E+03
Std4.8891E+009.7124E+025.3544E+025.3195E+035.0393E+033.8093E+034.6001E+022.6984E+031.1201E+03
Rank132987465
F15Best1.6005E+031.6011E+031.6006E+031.6007E+031.6123E+031.6034E+031.6083E+031.6047E+031.6017E+03
Mean1.6129E+031.6967E+031.7250E+031.7499E+031.6889E+031.7948E+031.6561E+031.7609E+031.6655E+03
Std2.4387E+011.0537E+021.0414E+021.2356E+029.3393E+011.3418E+026.3066E+011.0103E+028.1236E+01
Rank156749283
F16Best1.7006E+031.7030E+031.7226E+031.7054E+031.7335E+031.7266E+031.7316E+031.7300E+031.7016E+03
Mean1.7175E+031.7430E+031.7686E+031.7579E+031.7926E+031.7851E+031.7557E+031.7633E+031.7366E+03
Std1.2925E+012.7849E+014.3245E+014.7442E+014.6760E+014.0134E+011.3308E+012.3608E+012.4100E+01
Rank137598462
F17Best1.8004E+031.8214E+033.0761E+032.1102E+036.7235E+032.3857E+033.8406E+034.8596E+038.2724E+03
Mean1.8089E+037.0401E+032.6025E+043.0814E+042.7917E+042.9458E+041.4321E+042.1373E+042.9249E+04
Std9.1926E+009.9823E+031.6023E+041.9249E+041.3963E+041.3557E+047.2371E+031.4615E+041.2063E+04
Rank125968347
F18Best1.9001E+031.9012E+031.9027E+031.9338E+031.9978E+031.9730E+031.9492E+032.0143E+031.9039E+03
Mean1.9014E+033.9873E+034.2267E+031.2969E+041.6045E+041.0622E+042.8139E+034.9575E+038.9580E+03
Std1.4326E+005.5127E+034.3312E+031.2647E+049.5582E+039.9016E+031.1243E+034.5816E+037.0951E+03
Rank134897256
F19Best2.0000E+032.0050E+032.0053E+032.0050E+032.0225E+032.0377E+032.0230E+032.0245E+032.0004E+03
Mean2.0092E+032.0320E+032.0623E+032.0359E+032.0638E+032.1121E+032.0425E+032.1104E+032.0160E+03
Std1.0646E+011.7704E+014.9253E+012.5263E+013.8850E+015.4830E+011.2920E+016.4250E+011.2499E+01
Rank136479582
F20Best2.2000E+032.2000E+032.2004E+032.2027E+032.2012E+032.2025E+032.2031E+032.2005E+032.2007E+03
Mean2.2951E+032.3170E+032.3197E+032.3076E+032.3039E+032.3261E+032.2735E+032.2067E+032.2564E+03
Std3.7582E+013.3580E+013.3733E+014.7849E+015.2178E+014.3407E+015.1597E+012.2037E+015.7330E+01
Rank478659312
F21Best2.3000E+032.3008E+032.3012E+032.3000E+032.2402E+032.3013E+032.2511E+032.2403E+032.3010E+03
Mean2.3001E+032.3025E+032.3632E+032.3022E+032.3732E+032.3411E+032.3016E+032.2993E+032.3031E+03
Std1.7247E−011.2737E+002.0125E+021.3134E+002.7993E+022.0183E+029.6576E+001.5901E+011.3148E+00
Rank258497316
F22Best2.6031E+032.6085E+032.6105E+032.6097E+032.6140E+032.6135E+032.6069E+032.6139E+032.6101E+03
Mean2.6119E+032.6204E+032.6240E+032.6231E+032.6242E+032.6306E+032.6164E+032.6292E+032.6200E+03
Std5.0350E+007.4125E+009.4657E+006.9834E+006.6024E+001.1225E+014.5414E+008.4811E+006.8633E+00
Rank146579283
F23Best2.7317E+032.5004E+032.7414E+032.7398E+032.5001E+032.5009E+032.5214E+032.5000E+032.5014E+03
Mean2.7390E+032.7448E+032.7587E+032.7607E+032.7465E+032.7480E+032.6901E+032.6462E+032.7431E+03
Std3.9986E+004.7343E+011.0029E+011.4095E+014.7579E+016.8380E+018.4535E+011.2759E+024.6720E+01
Rank358967214
F24Best2.8977E+032.8985E+032.8980E+032.8984E+032.8978E+032.8991E+032.8990E+032.8988E+032.8978E+03
Mean2.9273E+032.9245E+032.9413E+032.9401E+032.9368E+032.9467E+032.9278E+032.9350E+032.9274E+03
Std2.2583E+012.4741E+013.6399E+013.3668E+012.9531E+014.2640E+012.0356E+012.1839E+012.4010E+01
Rank218769453
F25Best2.9000E+032.9000E+032.8002E+032.9000E+032.9000E+032.8000E+032.8335E+032.6001E+032.9000E+03
Mean2.9032E+033.0291E+033.0941E+033.2396E+033.1279E+033.1002E+032.9229E+032.9457E+032.9501E+03
Std1.1957E+011.9114E+023.5240E+024.3707E+023.7141E+023.7626E+022.6615E+011.2609E+024.4351E+01
Rank156987234
F26Best3.0890E+033.0784E+033.0890E+033.0880E+033.0890E+033.0898E+033.0908E+033.0893E+033.0890E+03
Mean3.0901E+033.0908E+033.1007E+033.0944E+033.0918E+033.0956E+033.0957E+033.0944E+033.0969E+03
Std1.6432E+003.4881E+002.0273E+011.2550E+012.6843E+003.4264E+001.9211E+003.6044E+001.7267E+01
Rank129436758
F27Best3.1000E+033.1000E+033.1025E+033.1004E+033.1691E+033.1643E+033.1145E+033.1000E+033.1000E+03
Mean3.2457E+033.2560E+033.3223E+033.3436E+033.3713E+033.3618E+033.1883E+033.2349E+033.2842E+03
Std1.4244E+027.9209E+011.2023E+021.5655E+021.7861E+028.8264E+014.5353E+011.1212E+021.2119E+02
Rank346798125
F28Best3.1293E+033.1342E+033.1411E+033.1372E+033.1396E+033.1388E+033.1482E+033.1505E+033.1327E+03
Mean3.1404E+033.1842E+033.2297E+033.2365E+033.2307E+033.2582E+033.1920E+033.2229E+033.1909E+03
Std1.0094E+015.0117E+016.4164E+017.4800E+016.5920E+018.6973E+012.1988E+015.0169E+015.1204E+01
Rank126879453
F29Best3.4600E+033.2667E+035.7074E+035.0654E+038.2037E+033.9065E+036.5876E+031.2329E+045.2648E+03
Mean2.3768E+055.6184E+046.4584E+053.7430E+051.6850E+055.4212E+052.1454E+055.4490E+053.8659E+05
Std4.4337E+051.3969E+055.2116E+054.5765E+053.6875E+056.4624E+053.8785E+055.7543E+055.4219E+05
Rank419527386
Table A10. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (30D).
Table A10. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (30D).
No.IndexBWSMAPSMADEMSSMAESMALSMAAOSMAEOSMAISMADTSMA
F1Best1.0241E+021.0000E+021.7291E+023.7327E+031.0320E+041.2304E+053.5973E+081.2542E+055.7404E+03
Mean3.5430E+031.4118E+071.2998E+051.6695E+045.0382E+043.1874E+061.2881E+091.3853E+064.5185E+07
Std4.2661E+033.7591E+074.7172E+058.5435E+032.8901E+045.5201E+065.3013E+081.3097E+068.7864E+07
Rank174236958
F2Best3.0103E+023.0000E+022.8664E+042.3037E+043.3479E+044.4410E+044.8077E+043.0546E+042.4655E+04
Mean3.5108E+024.8235E+044.3406E+045.0769E+045.7363E+046.8079E+049.1421E+044.4395E+045.2740E+04
Std6.5321E+016.1524E+047.8098E+031.4251E+041.5002E+041.3491E+041.9067E+046.8378E+031.7852E+04
Rank142578936
F3Best4.4193E+024.0000E+024.5994E+024.6514E+024.5151E+024.9948E+025.5809E+024.9150E+024.6726E+02
Mean4.9308E+024.5967E+025.1794E+025.0221E+025.1506E+025.5624E+026.4188E+025.3694E+025.1650E+02
Std1.6638E+017.4924E+013.6029E+011.6206E+013.3691E+014.7844E+014.8388E+013.0625E+012.2938E+01
Rank216348975
F4Best5.2105E+025.7263E+025.9859E+025.6560E+025.8556E+026.2068E+026.1724E+026.4157E+025.5880E+02
Mean5.3446E+026.4223E+026.7198E+026.2131E+026.3729E+027.1174E+026.7363E+027.1666E+026.0262E+02
Std9.8776E+006.3477E+014.0051E+012.9501E+013.4407E+015.1709E+012.3317E+013.5392E+012.4976E+01
Rank156348792
F5Best6.0009E+026.0791E+026.1292E+026.0294E+026.0794E+026.3444E+026.0773E+026.3228E+026.0467E+02
Mean6.0027E+026.2241E+026.2577E+026.0798E+026.2798E+026.5342E+026.1455E+026.5279E+026.1451E+02
Std7.7242E−021.1111E+018.8767E+004.9515E+009.8583E+009.7114E+003.4375E+009.1784E+005.0759E+00
Rank156279483
F6Best7.4556E+028.2562E+028.7381E+028.2215E+028.1802E+029.2856E+028.9876E+028.8149E+028.0496E+02
Mean7.6442E+029.3173E+029.9274E+028.6649E+028.7752E+021.0956E+039.4882E+021.0810E+038.8302E+02
Std1.0946E+015.5169E+017.8436E+013.1701E+014.2533E+019.4316E+012.8888E+019.1748E+013.7495E+01
Rank157239684
F7Best8.1328E+028.6169E+028.8482E+028.6285E+028.6865E+029.2066E+029.2705E+028.9276E+028.7115E+02
Mean8.3911E+029.3280E+029.6105E+029.2403E+029.2335E+029.8956E+029.6043E+029.5771E+029.1814E+02
Std1.3461E+013.8781E+013.8919E+012.8858E+012.9913E+013.4721E+011.8896E+013.3429E+012.3699E+01
Rank158439762
F8Best9.0020E+021.6277E+032.5918E+031.2613E+032.1267E+033.6763E+031.1939E+032.7916E+031.3675E+03
Mean9.0142E+024.2393E+034.1371E+033.4255E+034.4393E+035.9129E+031.9597E+035.0284E+033.5924E+03
Std1.3383E+002.3427E+038.3651E+021.3889E+031.5165E+031.2604E+038.0695E+021.2445E+031.2773E+03
Rank165379284
F9Best3.1575E+033.8546E+033.3938E+033.3154E+033.5730E+034.3268E+037.1904E+034.0389E+033.8054E+03
Mean4.2796E+035.4032E+034.5987E+034.6209E+035.0531E+035.5795E+038.1447E+035.2110E+035.4042E+03
Std6.4497E+027.7695E+026.5881E+027.5897E+025.6597E+028.6252E+025.2737E+025.9170E+028.5662E+02
Rank162348957
F10Best1.1099E+031.1796E+031.1773E+031.1493E+031.2155E+031.2433E+031.4725E+031.2276E+031.1713E+03
Mean1.1536E+031.4494E+031.2612E+031.2524E+031.3757E+031.4130E+032.2375E+031.3180E+031.3519E+03
Std3.6894E+012.7676E+024.8352E+015.5387E+017.5120E+011.0104E+023.8970E+026.0377E+017.6869E+01
Rank183267945
F11Best8.5647E+031.9807E+038.4931E+057.2331E+048.3585E+053.4579E+062.5360E+062.7654E+062.7002E+05
Mean3.0646E+043.6501E+064.9991E+063.8483E+061.7322E+072.1958E+072.7577E+072.3192E+075.3178E+06
Std2.4784E+041.1853E+073.0312E+062.3742E+061.6666E+071.9430E+072.1720E+071.7543E+076.0905E+06
Rank124367985
F12Best1.7429E+032.6599E+035.0559E+032.6558E+036.5428E+044.9793E+041.0877E+051.9101E+044.7654E+03
Mean3.1906E+038.1774E+043.2921E+042.9090E+042.8900E+053.3489E+056.3503E+051.8810E+053.4571E+04
Std9.1225E+023.1742E+052.9239E+043.1265E+041.6906E+052.9559E+057.0519E+051.2780E+052.9324E+04
Rank153278964
F13Best1.4351E+031.5261E+032.2473E+032.4087E+043.7078E+042.2516E+043.8881E+037.2448E+037.9603E+03
Mean1.4590E+035.9915E+042.4842E+055.3696E+051.5930E+056.6267E+056.1935E+041.6982E+058.4231E+04
Std1.5078E+011.5248E+052.5042E+057.7928E+051.1421E+058.3978E+054.6318E+041.8260E+058.5102E+04
Rank127859364
F14Best1.5974E+031.8174E+031.8245E+032.4421E+032.7453E+041.5066E+041.4090E+048.1183E+031.7036E+03
Mean1.7426E+031.6312E+041.2053E+041.7751E+041.2018E+058.9923E+041.0210E+056.2507E+041.4969E+04
Std1.0656E+021.4071E+041.2954E+041.4528E+046.2277E+044.2838E+041.3378E+054.7386E+041.4640E+04
Rank142597863
F15Best1.6057E+032.1962E+032.0153E+032.1159E+032.1554E+032.2986E+032.2915E+032.2115E+031.7616E+03
Mean2.0826E+032.7379E+032.8356E+032.7355E+032.8494E+033.1349E+032.9765E+033.2118E+032.4722E+03
Std2.6252E+023.4771E+023.1194E+023.2624E+023.8787E+024.0943E+023.0070E+023.6609E+024.0025E+02
Rank145368792
F16Best1.7596E+031.8194E+031.7941E+032.0875E+031.8798E+032.1020E+031.9196E+032.0644E+031.8731E+03
Mean1.8777E+032.2901E+032.4482E+032.4729E+032.3369E+032.6026E+032.0996E+032.4454E+032.2179E+03
Std1.0153E+022.6634E+022.9442E+021.9341E+022.2396E+022.9935E+021.2709E+022.3559E+021.7630E+02
Rank147859263
F17Best1.8850E+036.5967E+033.1736E+052.6581E+053.9312E+052.8630E+053.3235E+056.7536E+041.8968E+05
Mean1.9892E+032.4335E+063.4410E+063.3765E+063.2823E+064.0981E+061.2317E+061.7889E+062.2733E+06
Std6.9781E+015.5680E+064.3506E+063.0887E+063.1294E+064.2853E+068.9160E+051.9863E+062.2462E+06
Rank158769234
F18Best1.9250E+032.1552E+031.9932E+032.0785E+032.4984E+048.1859E+031.4645E+042.9067E+042.1916E+03
Mean1.9746E+032.6974E+041.1809E+042.1619E+042.8949E+051.0086E+052.5905E+054.9970E+052.2184E+04
Std3.3756E+012.1763E+041.4207E+042.2347E+041.4936E+051.0037E+052.8063E+054.2058E+051.9196E+04
Rank152386794
F19Best2.0303E+032.2112E+032.1115E+032.1977E+032.3453E+032.4294E+032.2385E+032.2954E+032.1049E+03
Mean2.1999E+032.5440E+032.4647E+032.5567E+032.7181E+032.7463E+032.5622E+032.5784E+032.3865E+03
Std1.3211E+022.2853E+022.0716E+022.5932E+021.9639E+021.4144E+021.8271E+021.7645E+021.9170E+02
Rank143589672
F20Best2.3225E+032.3640E+032.3980E+032.3699E+032.3606E+032.4222E+032.4234E+032.3930E+032.3727E+03
Mean2.3367E+032.4514E+032.4622E+032.4239E+032.4290E+032.5139E+032.4608E+032.4813E+032.4145E+03
Std1.1600E+016.9749E+014.5525E+013.2081E+013.4988E+015.0959E+011.7872E+014.2456E+013.1120E+01
Rank157349682
F21Best2.3003E+032.3000E+032.3038E+032.3025E+032.3063E+032.3083E+032.4109E+032.3130E+032.3146E+03
Mean4.1865E+035.9580E+035.0575E+035.6692E+036.3206E+036.7003E+032.8344E+032.4912E+036.0817E+03
Std1.6751E+031.6452E+031.8966E+031.0780E+031.5673E+031.3190E+031.2660E+038.9335E+021.7492E+03
Rank364589217
F22Best2.6735E+032.7140E+032.7212E+032.7163E+032.7145E+032.7902E+032.7633E+032.7835E+032.7045E+03
Mean2.6919E+032.7709E+032.7931E+032.7648E+032.7682E+032.8755E+032.8118E+032.8748E+032.7585E+03
Std1.0484E+014.6940E+013.8668E+012.3102E+012.7202E+016.4277E+012.5633E+016.4406E+012.8925E+01
Rank156349782
F23Best2.8324E+032.8691E+032.9088E+032.8752E+032.8681E+032.9288E+032.9489E+032.9202E+032.8973E+03
Mean2.8571E+032.9401E+032.9753E+032.9444E+032.9328E+033.0065E+032.9861E+033.0176E+032.9193E+03
Std1.4884E+016.4039E+014.4717E+013.8130E+013.2989E+015.2661E+012.1654E+015.6275E+011.5390E+01
Rank146538792
F24Best2.8870E+032.8760E+032.8852E+032.8840E+032.8920E+032.9007E+032.9622E+032.9091E+032.8848E+03
Mean2.8907E+032.9097E+032.9185E+032.8960E+032.9229E+032.9484E+033.0280E+032.9506E+032.9243E+03
Std1.0557E+013.4297E+012.8471E+011.0110E+012.1556E+012.8941E+013.9173E+012.7926E+012.9201E+01
Rank134257986
F25Best2.9014E+034.4571E+033.3839E+032.9019E+032.9175E+032.8931E+033.7856E+032.8275E+034.4050E+03
Mean3.9298E+035.3702E+035.3353E+034.8042E+035.0892E+036.0703E+035.2000E+034.5094E+034.8686E+03
Std2.3423E+027.8087E+026.9976E+027.1782E+024.9934E+021.0926E+036.2731E+021.6966E+032.4936E+02
Rank187359624
F26Best3.1903E+033.1699E+033.2141E+033.2131E+033.2073E+033.2227E+033.2498E+033.2204E+033.2024E+03
Mean3.2092E+033.2029E+033.2400E+033.2319E+033.2373E+033.2563E+033.2923E+033.2731E+033.2257E+03
Std1.1246E+012.5796E+011.7800E+011.3820E+011.8337E+011.8603E+012.1097E+014.1984E+011.6433E+01
Rank216457983
F27Best3.1515E+033.1000E+033.2243E+033.2149E+033.2374E+033.2482E+033.3422E+033.2359E+033.2179E+03
Mean3.2208E+033.2945E+033.2798E+033.2797E+033.3135E+033.3366E+033.4381E+033.3154E+033.3196E+03
Std2.4966E+011.6891E+023.6831E+015.3500E+015.7544E+016.6068E+015.9463E+013.6098E+019.5669E+01
Rank143258967
F28Best3.3168E+033.5729E+033.6311E+033.6183E+033.7617E+033.7044E+033.7077E+033.6549E+033.5798E+03
Mean3.4787E+034.1508E+034.1094E+034.0179E+034.2156E+034.4999E+034.0290E+034.3329E+033.9628E+03
Std1.1094E+023.2398E+022.2662E+022.0908E+022.8726E+024.5512E+022.0377E+022.9657E+021.9952E+02
Rank165379482
F29Best6.5387E+033.5199E+031.0919E+049.4444E+031.6955E+052.0461E+055.1950E+054.9837E+057.7834E+03
Mean9.2945E+034.5718E+043.1062E+042.7255E+042.2564E+061.8785E+062.9361E+064.5101E+064.7543E+04
Std1.9576E+037.1343E+042.0563E+042.1276E+041.5693E+062.1123E+061.6713E+063.4826E+066.4662E+04
Rank143276895
Table A11. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (50D).
Table A11. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (50D).
No.IndexBWSMAPSMADEMSSMAESMALSMAAOSMAEOSMAISMADTSMA
F1Best2.2772E+041.0000E+026.4899E+059.7295E+053.9392E+069.5649E+075.6239E+095.7046E+073.4340E+07
Mean2.8243E+056.1813E+084.5348E+082.4241E+061.9712E+073.6576E+089.6131E+092.1697E+081.6302E+09
Std3.9156E+051.3707E+096.8866E+081.1989E+061.3938E+072.2345E+082.4211E+091.3587E+081.5894E+09
Rank176235948
F2Best4.8335E+033.0000E+028.7522E+041.0773E+051.3557E+051.4008E+051.3961E+051.0639E+051.0150E+05
Mean1.2313E+042.1724E+041.2955E+051.9671E+052.1779E+052.4652E+052.1285E+051.4603E+051.8305E+05
Std5.5277E+037.1891E+042.7665E+048.3683E+046.2447E+046.5210E+044.3165E+042.7059E+043.9778E+04
Rank123689745
F3Best4.7970E+024.0000E+025.3376E+025.1636E+025.8210E+026.4686E+021.1197E+035.9973E+025.9039E+02
Mean5.6915E+025.8963E+026.9837E+026.3937E+026.8473E+028.1523E+021.6784E+037.4700E+027.0552E+02
Std4.6928E+013.2269E+029.5195E+018.2290E+018.0461E+011.0539E+023.3899E+029.5846E+019.0605E+01
Rank125348976
F4Best5.4801E+026.9568E+027.1428E+026.7726E+027.0535E+027.7916E+028.1320E+027.7826E+026.8301E+02
Mean5.7665E+028.6683E+028.4565E+027.7474E+028.2337E+028.8183E+028.8336E+028.6257E+027.8430E+02
Std1.8467E+018.2701E+015.1042E+014.9038E+015.8738E+014.5495E+013.9031E+014.5313E+014.5274E+01
Rank175248963
F5Best6.0118E+026.3126E+026.3528E+026.1203E+026.2703E+026.4602E+026.1869E+026.5129E+026.1841E+02
Mean6.0176E+026.5209E+026.5763E+026.3189E+026.5783E+026.6525E+026.2796E+026.6608E+026.3405E+02
Std4.0912E−011.2810E+017.0569E+001.3147E+011.3764E+019.6085E+004.5632E+005.9429E+008.6927E+00
Rank156378294
F6Best8.1345E+021.0202E+031.1952E+039.8396E+021.0587E+031.4611E+031.1407E+031.2768E+031.0032E+03
Mean8.3261E+021.3281E+031.3932E+031.0710E+031.1928E+031.6114E+031.2732E+031.5255E+031.1562E+03
Std1.3712E+011.9399E+021.2780E+025.8507E+016.9656E+019.0108E+015.0025E+011.2564E+027.8902E+01
Rank167249583
F7Best8.5389E+029.8108E+029.6875E+029.7108E+029.8655E+021.0898E+031.1298E+031.1131E+039.9292E+02
Mean8.8293E+021.1569E+031.0984E+031.0608E+031.0799E+031.1762E+031.1809E+031.1857E+031.0817E+03
Std1.6990E+011.2745E+025.5483E+014.2841E+014.7072E+014.0532E+013.6644E+014.8019E+015.4665E+01
Rank165237894
F8Best9.1646E+027.3420E+039.8470E+036.7604E+035.7581E+031.1029E+044.8197E+039.2286E+034.5803E+03
Mean9.8237E+021.2779E+041.3742E+041.3700E+041.5300E+041.7266E+048.6381E+031.5002E+041.5044E+04
Std6.5657E+014.2815E+032.3205E+033.4261E+034.6562E+033.5880E+032.5935E+032.8783E+036.4447E+03
Rank135489267
F9Best5.4030E+037.6646E+035.8646E+035.3024E+036.9870E+037.4566E+031.2738E+047.0330E+037.6102E+03
Mean7.0530E+039.0861E+037.7637E+037.7454E+039.2959E+039.1503E+031.4042E+049.3203E+031.0048E+04
Std8.3965E+028.0896E+028.3191E+021.0840E+039.4611E+029.5531E+026.9658E+021.1188E+031.3253E+03
Rank143265978
F10Best1.1788E+031.2681E+031.3106E+031.2641E+031.5093E+031.5648E+033.9085E+031.6562E+031.3758E+03
Mean1.2613E+031.5997E+031.6696E+031.6011E+031.7681E+031.9905E+037.6993E+032.3330E+031.7888E+03
Std4.9045E+017.2125E+025.4318E+023.6943E+021.5322E+022.8048E+022.3595E+034.2746E+026.0474E+02
Rank124357986
F11Best2.6165E+054.8274E+035.6123E+064.9412E+063.1661E+071.4728E+072.3931E+081.1518E+077.1583E+06
Mean1.5527E+062.9104E+072.4402E+073.1679E+071.3788E+081.8082E+084.8420E+081.5218E+085.9298E+07
Std9.5160E+056.6964E+071.2898E+071.7887E+076.2919E+071.0877E+082.1731E+081.0985E+084.3923E+07
Rank132468975
F12Best9.5964E+033.1327E+036.3253E+032.0611E+049.1026E+048.9658E+042.7505E+064.7423E+041.6261E+04
Mean2.2395E+044.3151E+042.9145E+045.0479E+043.4285E+053.2943E+051.7669E+072.3177E+059.3725E+04
Std7.7615E+039.6662E+041.8915E+041.5178E+041.7265E+052.0768E+051.3889E+072.4851E+055.6176E+04
Rank132487965
F13Best1.5033E+032.0889E+031.9077E+052.3245E+054.1731E+041.1731E+053.9002E+049.8721E+046.2884E+04
Mean1.6526E+032.9368E+051.6980E+061.6337E+067.4726E+051.9352E+065.5138E+059.9456E+056.2524E+05
Std7.8456E+015.4349E+051.7153E+061.3047E+064.9908E+052.0747E+064.4313E+057.8930E+053.9331E+05
Rank128759364
F14Best2.5115E+031.9923E+032.4372E+033.0474E+034.4306E+045.2545E+047.9464E+049.0954E+033.7593E+03
Mean3.1552E+032.3014E+041.6238E+041.8430E+041.9472E+051.7005E+054.4899E+057.3543E+042.5794E+04
Std6.6451E+022.8203E+049.0873E+031.0653E+041.2988E+058.2724E+044.8514E+059.6703E+041.2565E+04
Rank142387965
F15Best1.7799E+032.2160E+032.8406E+032.6805E+032.5063E+033.2678E+033.2432E+033.1045E+032.5820E+03
Mean2.8279E+033.8730E+033.7318E+033.5517E+033.9490E+034.2687E+033.9910E+034.2396E+033.5876E+03
Std4.5854E+026.1011E+024.6396E+024.3651E+025.1307E+025.0142E+023.4916E+025.6080E+024.3924E+02
Rank154269783
F16Best2.1039E+033.0801E+032.9636E+032.6659E+033.1485E+033.1694E+032.7991E+032.9940E+032.7311E+03
Mean2.5797E+033.7260E+033.4508E+033.3790E+033.7855E+033.9485E+033.5078E+033.6257E+033.3087E+03
Std2.5402E+024.3092E+022.6435E+023.2551E+023.6903E+023.9901E+022.8821E+023.3162E+023.1031E+02
Rank174389562
F17Best2.4931E+035.7230E+035.0978E+056.3527E+055.5984E+059.3466E+051.5501E+061.1075E+065.7002E+05
Mean6.6545E+031.4355E+067.1096E+065.8980E+067.1864E+068.5324E+066.1690E+065.7511E+065.8071E+06
Std5.3557E+033.2474E+066.0555E+063.8228E+065.4004E+066.0432E+063.5232E+066.9422E+063.9372E+06
Rank127589634
F18Best1.9961E+032.2001E+032.2033E+032.5872E+031.7702E+052.1330E+051.3118E+043.3468E+052.2445E+03
Mean2.4372E+031.5373E+042.4267E+041.9118E+041.4870E+069.0219E+056.5246E+052.5440E+061.9678E+04
Std7.1108E+021.5870E+041.5578E+041.5900E+048.5286E+056.7015E+054.9698E+051.8325E+061.7534E+04
Rank125387694
F19Best2.1923E+032.3610E+032.5608E+032.3493E+032.7197E+032.5954E+032.9493E+032.7084E+032.4565E+03
Mean2.7642E+033.4931E+033.2342E+033.1603E+033.5204E+033.6650E+033.5330E+033.2753E+033.2692E+03
Std3.0558E+023.8923E+023.2802E+023.4727E+023.2343E+023.4552E+022.7198E+022.7457E+022.9840E+02
Rank163279854
F20Best2.3525E+032.4628E+032.5003E+032.4647E+032.4897E+032.6142E+032.5620E+032.5834E+032.4656E+03
Mean2.3792E+032.7182E+032.6108E+032.5588E+032.5829E+032.7551E+032.6545E+032.7188E+032.5445E+03
Std1.5952E+011.7438E+026.5267E+015.4364E+015.5821E+017.1946E+013.6505E+017.4931E+014.2963E+01
Rank175349682
F21Best5.8954E+037.9284E+032.3225E+037.6005E+038.0607E+038.4443E+031.3962E+042.5834E+031.0015E+04
Mean8.2923E+031.0139E+049.2732E+039.3368E+031.0376E+041.0890E+041.5541E+041.0491E+041.1635E+04
Std9.2514E+027.8962E+021.6194E+039.3280E+021.2507E+031.1995E+037.1557E+022.2906E+031.1931E+03
Rank142357968
F22Best2.7643E+032.9340E+032.9430E+032.9190E+032.9364E+033.0835E+033.0353E+033.0611E+032.9154E+03
Mean2.8093E+033.1147E+033.0742E+033.0007E+033.0245E+033.2612E+033.1254E+033.2536E+032.9857E+03
Std2.3901E+011.6809E+026.0556E+014.8584E+014.6460E+011.2045E+023.2962E+019.9453E+014.4996E+01
Rank165349782
F23Best2.9373E+033.0184E+033.0966E+033.0755E+033.0720E+033.2100E+033.1916E+033.1287E+033.0444E+03
Mean2.9723E+033.1773E+033.2383E+033.1713E+033.1390E+033.3821E+033.2632E+033.3169E+033.1376E+03
Std1.6964E+011.0223E+026.3556E+016.2760E+014.6589E+019.4779E+013.7262E+019.9917E+015.2025E+01
Rank156439782
F24Best2.9855E+032.9312E+033.0572E+033.0519E+033.0675E+033.1051E+033.5453E+033.1440E+033.1005E+03
Mean3.0412E+032.9676E+033.2137E+033.1071E+033.1506E+033.2843E+034.1380E+033.2235E+033.2335E+03
Std2.2587E+011.2279E+029.6798E+013.6783E+014.0343E+016.7984E+013.7539E+025.8671E+011.1355E+02
Rank215348967
F25Best4.1717E+036.0278E+033.8480E+032.9401E+033.3680E+034.5733E+036.5525E+034.0205E+035.2928E+03
Mean4.5449E+038.0511E+038.2157E+036.1177E+036.1024E+039.7460E+037.8129E+037.5498E+036.4015E+03
Std2.3611E+021.5523E+032.1005E+031.8223E+032.0601E+031.5762E+035.7347E+023.2412E+034.5993E+02
Rank178329654
F26Best3.2264E+033.2000E+033.4081E+033.3502E+033.3825E+033.3675E+033.6584E+033.5170E+033.3002E+03
Mean3.3094E+033.2497E+033.6312E+033.4914E+033.5325E+033.7199E+033.8608E+033.7184E+033.5019E+03
Std3.8880E+011.3086E+021.2887E+029.5240E+011.0043E+021.6699E+021.1246E+021.6586E+028.4692E+01
Rank216358974
F27Best3.2632E+033.3000E+033.3887E+033.3090E+033.3401E+033.5230E+034.2240E+033.4343E+033.6218E+03
Mean3.3027E+033.6494E+033.7291E+033.4022E+033.7394E+033.9086E+034.7918E+033.6985E+034.5933E+03
Std3.1206E+019.2299E+025.6153E+028.2011E+014.4994E+025.0080E+023.3160E+021.2370E+025.4456E+02
Rank135267948
F28Best3.3828E+034.0942E+033.6990E+033.7354E+034.4689E+034.8256E+034.5305E+034.8457E+033.8868E+03
Mean3.8790E+035.4609E+034.7477E+034.6392E+035.5211E+036.3663E+035.0799E+036.3122E+034.8225E+03
Std2.2118E+028.6846E+023.9770E+024.1482E+025.1188E+026.8571E+023.0028E+026.7974E+025.2890E+02
Rank163279584
F29Best1.0807E+063.7388E+031.1910E+061.6414E+062.6098E+071.5959E+074.0173E+072.8447E+074.1697E+06
Mean2.5866E+064.2287E+062.8195E+062.9428E+065.0468E+076.5650E+079.1566E+071.0305E+081.2572E+07
Std9.6265E+059.1032E+061.1761E+067.7206E+051.9286E+072.3721E+072.5710E+074.1232E+075.1729E+06
Rank142367895
Table A12. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (100D).
Table A12. Comparison results between BWSMA and SMA variants based on CEC2018 (100D).
No.IndexBWSMAPSMADEMSSMAESMALSMAAOSMAEOSMAISMADTSMA
F1Best1.0265E+081.0000E+021.0273E+101.5980E+081.3914E+095.7963E+096.0312E+105.0720E+091.9181E+10
Mean2.8491E+082.0209E+092.8975E+102.2008E+084.5267E+091.3254E+108.7886E+101.0330E+103.8529E+10
Std1.7408E+081.1069E+101.1025E+103.5040E+071.5496E+093.7959E+091.3888E+102.8149E+091.2755E+10
Rank237146958
F2Best1.3769E+056.5811E+022.4868E+053.1837E+053.2539E+053.3116E+053.6328E+052.9425E+054.4900E+05
Mean1.6598E+056.2645E+043.1088E+059.5370E+057.9412E+055.9109E+055.4570E+053.4426E+057.4169E+05
Std2.2104E+042.0461E+055.8454E+042.7790E+053.4020E+053.1668E+051.0958E+052.8032E+041.3130E+05
Rank213986547
F3Best6.9066E+024.0000E+021.1313E+037.1488E+021.0305E+031.5504E+038.0323E+031.3348E+031.3791E+03
Mean8.3589E+026.8358E+021.9135E+039.2868E+021.4377E+032.5573E+031.0049E+042.0374E+032.3361E+03
Std6.2124E+011.1038E+036.5387E+029.6152E+011.9733E+024.7336E+021.3399E+034.3262E+026.8833E+02
Rank215348967
F4Best7.2204E+021.2034E+031.2513E+031.0907E+031.2478E+031.3443E+031.4119E+031.2258E+031.1609E+03
Mean8.0340E+021.3592E+031.3776E+031.2785E+031.4234E+031.4986E+031.5635E+031.4727E+031.3270E+03
Std3.9544E+011.5183E+027.0398E+011.0696E+028.2376E+016.0082E+016.5691E+017.2246E+011.0034E+02
Rank145268973
F5Best6.1384E+026.4660E+026.5098E+026.4089E+026.5884E+026.6770E+026.4678E+026.6969E+026.5472E+02
Mean6.1915E+026.6098E+026.6499E+026.5353E+026.7448E+026.7724E+026.5588E+026.7855E+026.6524E+02
Std3.2956E+007.6064E+004.2144E+006.6013E+005.6399E+005.3401E+005.3264E+005.2588E+006.7805E+00
Rank145278396
F6Best1.2112E+032.1898E+032.5445E+031.7037E+031.9892E+032.6188E+032.4914E+032.5839E+032.1128E+03
Mean1.3225E+032.9305E+032.8889E+032.0733E+032.4867E+033.1360E+032.6646E+033.1600E+032.4525E+03
Std6.0837E+013.9502E+021.8954E+021.6539E+022.6303E+021.9145E+021.2601E+022.1020E+022.0140E+02
Rank176248593
F7Best1.0303E+031.4547E+031.5244E+031.3885E+031.5666E+031.7462E+031.7250E+031.7466E+031.3715E+03
Mean1.1138E+031.7599E+031.7277E+031.6059E+031.7476E+031.9288E+031.8680E+031.8976E+031.6628E+03
Std4.4101E+012.2933E+029.5766E+011.2007E+021.0755E+028.8628E+017.1663E+016.5942E+011.1775E+02
Rank164259783
F8Best3.3200E+031.7656E+042.3437E+042.2879E+042.9949E+042.7167E+043.3780E+042.7446E+043.0431E+04
Mean5.6313E+032.5263E+042.9508E+043.3904E+043.5627E+043.6056E+044.5519E+043.7223E+045.0494E+04
Std1.9177E+036.3680E+034.1699E+034.5039E+033.7481E+036.9673E+037.0502E+034.6684E+031.2132E+04
Rank123456879
F9Best1.4404E+041.4789E+041.3664E+041.3776E+041.7255E+041.4275E+042.9286E+041.6856E+041.8778E+04
Mean1.7008E+041.7120E+041.5993E+041.6928E+042.0754E+041.9953E+043.0990E+042.0679E+042.3748E+04
Std1.6548E+031.6567E+031.2731E+031.5835E+031.8778E+032.0016E+038.1299E+021.6560E+032.5491E+03
Rank341275968
F10Best3.2800E+032.3545E+031.9234E+041.9824E+043.6450E+044.5393E+041.1277E+053.5420E+041.8560E+04
Mean4.5120E+031.2215E+044.6116E+046.2465E+047.3751E+041.3203E+051.5850E+059.0541E+047.2622E+04
Std8.6733E+023.1913E+041.3927E+043.1548E+041.8775E+044.3091E+042.6668E+042.8683E+042.7561E+04
Rank123468975
F11Best4.3706E+071.5220E+041.0893E+087.9872E+073.3278E+083.9815E+086.6482E+095.9159E+084.9303E+08
Mean9.5046E+071.5894E+086.4656E+082.5477E+089.2137E+081.5528E+091.1253E+101.2719E+091.7100E+09
Std3.5906E+078.6647E+088.7260E+088.8376E+073.7032E+086.6314E+082.8981E+095.2978E+089.5708E+08
Rank124357968
F12Best3.2287E+047.3629E+032.3195E+044.5849E+048.7732E+041.9407E+057.2208E+071.4726E+057.9464E+04
Mean6.1914E+045.3463E+052.5788E+052.5030E+065.7856E+065.3851E+064.6223E+086.0345E+051.5233E+07
Std1.5329E+042.8460E+067.9590E+056.3380E+061.4225E+072.2779E+072.5845E+084.2061E+052.3430E+07
Rank132576948
F13Best6.3099E+032.0865E+031.0861E+061.6450E+069.1892E+051.3205E+063.2904E+062.7567E+068.4568E+05
Mean2.1032E+043.7529E+054.4620E+065.1977E+066.8331E+067.1228E+061.0192E+075.3935E+065.9499E+06
Std1.2511E+041.0311E+062.1301E+063.0286E+063.2925E+063.6973E+065.2513E+062.0616E+063.6656E+06
Rank123478956
F14Best8.1804E+031.7682E+035.9453E+031.1694E+043.6463E+045.7567E+048.4992E+062.8868E+043.7769E+04
Mean2.6324E+042.2146E+056.6900E+047.9369E+051.6305E+067.6887E+052.8000E+075.1332E+053.6294E+05
Std1.1801E+041.1548E+061.9317E+051.6329E+062.4890E+063.4224E+061.4665E+072.4034E+061.4097E+06
Rank132786954
F15Best4.0879E+035.2223E+034.7470E+034.5316E+036.2277E+036.8853E+037.9990E+036.9859E+034.6261E+03
Mean4.9977E+036.1325E+036.3646E+036.2083E+037.4944E+038.5775E+038.9878E+038.9101E+036.4175E+03
Std7.4905E+026.5246E+027.6658E+027.3010E+027.9277E+028.5704E+025.5377E+021.3104E+038.4104E+02
Rank124367985
F16Best3.4256E+034.7067E+035.0189E+034.6056E+035.4948E+036.0705E+035.6278E+035.3169E+034.5023E+03
Mean4.6606E+036.5558E+036.1219E+035.5962E+036.4246E+037.4520E+036.4340E+036.4170E+035.8027E+03
Std5.0956E+029.5349E+025.8425E+026.1499E+026.0518E+027.4471E+024.6567E+025.7613E+026.5486E+02
Rank184269753
F17Best4.7477E+041.5871E+041.8163E+063.0645E+062.4824E+061.8904E+063.6818E+062.1546E+061.3697E+06
Mean1.1397E+054.0302E+058.7971E+061.1373E+071.1956E+071.2483E+071.3980E+076.8897E+069.0052E+06
Std2.9092E+041.2995E+066.1019E+065.9041E+066.4682E+066.3501E+067.2678E+064.2311E+066.1256E+06
Rank124678935
F18Best5.5765E+032.9290E+033.8233E+038.7634E+035.0790E+062.7242E+061.3736E+071.6232E+066.3781E+04
Mean3.4841E+041.6243E+052.0678E+041.1120E+051.4690E+071.4412E+074.4835E+071.5173E+071.9102E+06
Std5.1133E+048.0569E+051.3779E+041.7466E+055.4649E+066.9257E+062.2778E+079.3678E+063.6679E+06
Rank241376985
F19Best3.5877E+034.3344E+034.2840E+034.3189E+035.0748E+034.3897E+036.2242E+034.6176E+034.8461E+03
Mean4.7847E+035.7490E+035.3724E+035.4802E+035.9994E+036.0352E+037.1144E+035.6219E+035.9657E+03
Std5.5316E+026.8522E+025.0957E+025.8964E+026.6859E+025.8573E+023.9074E+024.8114E+026.3589E+02
Rank152378946
F20Best2.5332E+032.8945E+032.9976E+033.0009E+033.0305E+033.3541E+033.2557E+033.3003E+032.9346E+03
Mean2.6101E+033.2775E+033.2069E+033.1535E+033.2390E+033.6939E+033.3702E+033.6660E+033.1476E+03
Std4.1714E+012.9818E+021.0983E+021.1098E+021.4544E+021.7412E+027.0034E+012.2008E+021.0797E+02
Rank164359782
F21Best1.6957E+041.5881E+041.7543E+041.6381E+041.9203E+041.8058E+043.1234E+042.0840E+042.0508E+04
Mean1.9600E+041.8953E+041.9742E+041.9304E+042.2661E+042.2189E+043.3638E+042.4358E+042.5564E+04
Std1.7835E+031.6938E+031.3845E+031.3837E+031.6355E+031.6066E+031.1045E+031.9306E+032.7386E+03
Rank314265978
F22Best3.0796E+033.4184E+033.3219E+033.2563E+033.3552E+033.8151E+033.8254E+033.6516E+033.3939E+03
Mean3.1773E+033.7474E+033.5402E+033.4040E+033.5996E+034.0840E+034.0013E+034.1253E+033.5173E+03
Std4.9991E+013.0734E+029.1065E+018.9650E+011.2057E+021.8547E+028.7463E+011.9708E+021.1281E+02
Rank164258793
F23Best3.5310E+034.0138E+033.9474E+033.7837E+033.8917E+034.3896E+034.4619E+034.3582E+033.7723E+03
Mean3.6141E+034.4434E+034.3264E+034.0578E+034.1328E+034.8687E+034.7062E+034.8274E+034.0445E+03
Std4.8296E+013.0220E+021.7642E+021.4371E+021.5046E+022.0576E+021.3066E+022.8974E+021.5119E+02
Rank165349782
F24Best3.4140E+033.1342E+034.0962E+033.4387E+033.9387E+034.3573E+038.0506E+034.2950E+035.1241E+03
Mean3.5994E+033.3619E+034.5878E+033.6223E+034.3451E+034.8973E+039.5649E+034.6657E+035.9846E+03
Std7.7347E+017.5070E+023.5875E+028.5393E+011.8920E+023.0510E+021.0302E+032.3573E+027.0328E+02
Rank215347968
F25Best7.9404E+031.2056E+041.6024E+045.0144E+031.3366E+041.7083E+041.6903E+048.2631E+031.1857E+04
Mean9.3106E+031.8961E+041.9438E+041.4145E+041.6818E+042.3963E+042.2209E+042.2351E+041.4484E+04
Std5.2458E+023.5047E+032.4147E+032.8477E+032.0762E+033.8437E+032.6574E+035.0108E+031.3520E+03
Rank156249783
F26Best3.4009E+033.2000E+033.5941E+033.4927E+033.6195E+033.8200E+034.4311E+033.6766E+033.5763E+03
Mean3.5339E+033.3148E+033.7556E+033.6478E+033.8269E+034.2150E+034.7317E+034.0241E+033.7398E+03
Std5.6082E+012.2273E+021.0393E+027.8908E+011.1259E+022.2145E+022.1257E+022.5743E+021.1569E+02
Rank215368974
F27Best3.5590E+033.2325E+033.9333E+033.5705E+034.0311E+034.4549E+039.4426E+034.3866E+035.9944E+03
Mean3.6806E+033.4971E+034.3474E+033.7210E+034.6672E+035.5903E+031.2459E+045.2687E+031.0331E+04
Std9.5163E+011.0766E+032.7440E+021.1732E+023.9560E+025.5962E+021.3068E+034.4948E+022.8753E+03
Rank214357968
F28Best5.5167E+036.5066E+036.9109E+036.4502E+038.6281E+039.4831E+039.6880E+039.0513E+037.1650E+03
Mean6.6937E+039.2483E+038.0587E+037.4525E+031.0005E+041.1937E+041.0410E+041.0798E+048.8109E+03
Std6.2841E+021.5798E+036.3647E+025.0935E+028.4343E+021.2488E+035.5799E+029.9748E+028.0167E+02
Rank153269784
F29Best3.2499E+053.9667E+034.4536E+055.5091E+054.0327E+074.3498E+071.1863E+088.4034E+075.3455E+06
Mean1.1447E+069.8737E+052.9147E+061.7574E+061.4516E+081.9708E+083.0956E+082.7029E+084.0235E+07
Std5.1175E+055.3558E+062.7549E+069.2568E+057.1101E+071.1442E+081.0674E+081.6778E+082.8711E+07
Rank214367985
Table A13. Comparison results between BWSMA and improved algorithms based on CEC2022 (10D).
Table A13. Comparison results between BWSMA and improved algorithms based on CEC2022 (10D).
No.IndexBWSMANMPABEESOFDBAROWOSSAPHISAOESLPSOEPSCAIGWO
F1Best3.0000E+023.0965E+021.1153E+036.9410E+023.0251E+023.4055E+023.0003E+023.0000E+023.0040E+02
Mean3.0000E+023.5010E+022.4124E+032.6451E+035.6494E+021.2333E+033.2768E+023.0000E+023.0608E+02
Std1.3704E−033.6816E+018.9681E+021.2847E+034.6474E+021.0829E+035.3229E+013.6367E−137.1490E+00
Rank258967413
F2Best4.0002E+024.0048E+024.0505E+024.0084E+024.0003E+024.0003E+024.0005E+024.0000E+024.0004E+02
Mean4.0649E+024.0597E+024.0788E+024.0713E+024.1378E+024.1382E+024.0867E+024.0590E+024.0425E+02
Std2.8829E+004.0267E+001.1353E+005.3986E+002.1786E+011.8793E+017.2028E+002.9487E+003.0498E+00
Rank436589721
F3Best6.0000E+026.0135E+026.0002E+026.0055E+026.0000E+026.0000E+026.0000E+026.0000E+026.0009E+02
Mean6.0002E+026.0440E+026.0009E+026.0140E+026.0425E+026.0001E+026.0000E+026.0019E+026.0021E+02
Std1.9725E−022.3891E+006.2868E−025.9746E−015.9267E+003.9089E−027.1738E−055.9383E−016.2669E−02
Rank394782156
F4Best8.0298E+028.0657E+028.1322E+028.0767E+028.0995E+028.0099E+028.0597E+028.0497E+028.0300E+02
Mean8.0813E+028.2033E+028.2786E+028.1619E+028.2355E+028.0468E+028.2902E+028.1721E+028.1151E+02
Std3.4574E+006.0268E+006.4061E+005.0854E+007.9996E+002.4532E+008.9915E+001.0183E+017.3784E+00
Rank268471953
F5Best9.0000E+029.0160E+029.0000E+029.0035E+029.0018E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+029.0000E+02
Mean9.0001E+029.2421E+029.0015E+029.0395E+021.2470E+039.0011E+029.0002E+029.1037E+029.0004E+02
Std2.2714E−021.7375E+012.2947E−014.7900E+002.4488E+022.8510E−018.2948E−021.7032E+013.1145E−02
Rank185694273
F6Best1.8002E+032.2677E+031.9239E+031.9669E+031.9373E+031.8279E+031.8258E+031.8018E+032.5279E+03
Mean1.8130E+034.7254E+035.5868E+033.8589E+033.8391E+033.5875E+032.4158E+031.8374E+035.6507E+03
Std1.1076E+011.9140E+032.2316E+031.6484E+031.9209E+031.4286E+031.0026E+032.1735E+012.0008E+03
Rank178654329
F7Best2.0000E+032.0077E+032.0040E+032.0040E+032.0020E+032.0000E+032.0041E+032.0010E+032.0005E+03
Mean2.0163E+032.0264E+032.0193E+032.0199E+032.0285E+032.0125E+032.0212E+032.0218E+032.0225E+03
Std8.6227E+007.6143E+006.0034E+006.1569E+002.4754E+011.1892E+016.1163E+006.5941E+009.7098E+00
Rank283491567
F8Best2.2002E+032.2080E+032.2051E+032.2063E+032.2121E+032.2071E+032.2108E+032.2191E+032.2058E+03
Mean2.2138E+032.2233E+032.2246E+032.2203E+032.2345E+032.2209E+032.2248E+032.2222E+032.2249E+03
Std9.4827E+005.8835E+005.3873E+005.3409E+003.6571E+012.8473E+005.3055E+001.4329E+006.5047E+00
Rank156293748
F9Best2.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5297E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+03
Mean2.5293E+032.5298E+032.5293E+032.5323E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5293E+032.5295E+032.5293E+03
Std1.1269E−046.5754E−015.0892E−052.2155E+001.8882E−131.0924E−031.2057E−118.9043E−011.0193E−02
Rank483915276
F10Best2.5002E+032.5005E+032.4162E+032.5004E+032.5003E+032.5004E+032.5003E+032.5003E+032.5002E+03
Mean2.5225E+032.5007E+032.5061E+032.5045E+032.5831E+032.5223E+032.5384E+032.5471E+032.5291E+03
Std4.5283E+011.8549E−013.3035E+012.1513E+011.1410E+024.4533E+015.4936E+015.8024E+014.8532E+01
Rank513294786
F11Best2.6000E+032.6129E+032.6156E+032.6269E+032.6000E+032.6000E+032.6000E+032.6000E+032.6011E+03
Mean2.7400E+032.6891E+032.8666E+032.6882E+032.8350E+032.7460E+032.8850E+032.8541E+032.7923E+03
Std1.5222E+026.1054E+019.5766E+013.7680E+011.2257E+021.0695E+026.0354E+011.0875E+021.4748E+02
Rank328164975
F12Best2.8594E+032.8598E+032.8614E+032.8650E+032.8614E+032.8626E+032.8595E+032.8587E+032.8587E+03
Mean2.8631E+032.8639E+032.8630E+032.8671E+032.8652E+032.8657E+032.8634E+032.8636E+032.8615E+03
Std1.5168E+001.3249E+001.1777E+001.4621E+002.0772E+003.4210E+001.3576E+001.7798E+001.7010E+00
Rank362978451
Table A14. Comparison results between BWSMA and improved algorithms based on CEC2022 (20D).
Table A14. Comparison results between BWSMA and improved algorithms based on CEC2022 (20D).
No.IndexBWSMANMPABEESOFDBAROWOSSAPHISAOESLPSOEPSCAIGWO
F1Best3.0007E+021.8039E+031.3673E+049.0961E+035.3098E+033.6985E+032.6539E+033.0000E+024.7049E+02
Mean3.0044E+024.6668E+032.2083E+042.4648E+042.0495E+041.6363E+048.3584E+033.0000E+021.2235E+03
Std2.9651E−011.7709E+035.2385E+038.2944E+039.5228E+037.2825E+033.8480E+032.8731E−048.5465E+02
Rank248976513
F2Best4.4490E+024.5496E+024.4379E+024.6732E+024.2950E+024.4915E+024.2809E+024.4570E+024.4551E+02
Mean4.5129E+024.9243E+024.5352E+024.9723E+024.5679E+024.6030E+024.5307E+024.5280E+024.5206E+02
Std7.9738E+003.3924E+011.0620E+011.8108E+011.9035E+011.4497E+011.2623E+012.9438E+007.4437E+00
Rank185967432
F3Best6.0004E+026.1486E+026.0031E+026.0713E+026.1253E+026.0001E+026.0001E+026.0060E+026.0049E+02
Mean6.0012E+026.2573E+026.0069E+026.1146E+026.3642E+026.0017E+026.0004E+026.0505E+026.0087E+02
Std4.7548E−025.9748E+002.5291E−013.3456E+001.4684E+011.3581E−019.8757E−024.2466E+002.9917E−01
Rank284793165
F4Best8.0996E+028.5589E+028.5224E+028.4776E+028.4179E+028.0201E+028.1758E+028.1293E+028.1892E+02
Mean8.1862E+028.7798E+029.0549E+028.8757E+028.7558E+028.1355E+028.8026E+028.4285E+028.6294E+02
Std7.9788E+001.6972E+011.6344E+011.8908E+011.4255E+017.4343E+003.3000E+012.0627E+013.3746E+01
Rank269851734
F5Best9.0000E+021.0454E+039.0138E+029.4548E+021.3818E+039.0019E+029.0000E+029.1031E+029.0048E+02
Mean9.0010E+021.5154E+039.1601E+021.2747E+032.2076E+039.0433E+029.0149E+029.9821E+029.0330E+02
Std1.1172E−012.9033E+021.3881E+011.9099E+023.2760E+025.2224E+002.6049E+009.0140E+014.0960E+00
Rank185794263
F6Best1.8632E+034.6781E+043.4373E+039.2970E+042.0311E+031.8916E+032.1741E+031.8383E+035.5286E+03
Mean1.9348E+032.7734E+053.6287E+046.5703E+054.7017E+034.1236E+036.6227E+031.9371E+032.6349E+04
Std6.9540E+011.8390E+053.6673E+044.8947E+052.8453E+031.6139E+034.4147E+036.2737E+012.2103E+04
Rank187943526
F7Best2.0024E+032.0476E+032.0407E+032.0416E+032.0493E+032.0271E+032.0361E+032.0337E+032.0250E+03
Mean2.0253E+032.0835E+032.0715E+032.0735E+032.1554E+032.0455E+032.0731E+032.1053E+032.0394E+03
Std7.2348E+002.3341E+012.1550E+012.0006E+019.0132E+011.6314E+012.1476E+014.6183E+011.5171E+01
Rank174693582
F8Best2.2082E+032.2265E+032.2318E+032.2275E+032.2213E+032.2215E+032.2290E+032.2209E+032.2251E+03
Mean2.2223E+032.2366E+032.2440E+032.2322E+032.2663E+032.2237E+032.2384E+032.2501E+032.2321E+03
Std2.9836E+007.7123E+008.2011E+004.2814E+005.8295E+011.5108E+006.0786E+005.7527E+014.0645E+00
Rank157492683
F9Best2.4808E+032.4835E+032.4808E+032.4855E+032.4808E+032.4808E+032.4808E+032.4809E+032.4809E+03
Mean2.4808E+032.4890E+032.4812E+032.4986E+032.4808E+032.4823E+032.4808E+032.4853E+032.4812E+03
Std1.3075E−025.7888E+002.9200E−017.7565E+002.1844E−024.0684E+001.6510E−015.1455E+001.8047E−01
Rank185926374
F10Best2.5003E+032.5006E+032.5008E+032.5007E+032.5009E+032.5004E+032.5006E+032.5006E+032.5004E+03
Mean2.8591E+032.5097E+032.6640E+032.7481E+033.6943E+032.6542E+033.5838E+033.8779E+032.7523E+03
Std3.7931E+023.9295E+011.6176E+025.0183E+027.4353E+022.8251E+021.7920E+039.8056E+027.7621E+02
Rank613482795
F11Best2.9001E+033.0921E+033.1382E+033.4002E+032.6001E+032.9029E+032.9001E+032.9000E+032.9262E+03
Mean2.9007E+033.5457E+033.3026E+033.7754E+032.9059E+032.9347E+032.9005E+032.9000E+032.9484E+03
Std3.6095E−012.1732E+021.0598E+022.6842E+021.1442E+025.0484E+012.2818E−015.0191E−101.4977E+01
Rank387945216
F12Best2.9320E+032.9526E+032.9411E+032.9755E+032.9431E+032.9417E+032.9326E+032.9393E+032.9325E+03
Mean2.9413E+032.9770E+032.9494E+033.0062E+032.9811E+032.9514E+032.9490E+032.9581E+032.9416E+03
Std7.2332E+002.0969E+018.2173E+001.6236E+013.9831E+017.5426E+001.3392E+011.2415E+015.5385E+00
Rank174985362
Figure A1. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (10D).
Figure A1. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (10D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g0a1aBiomimetics 10 00504 g0a1b
Figure A2. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (30D).
Figure A2. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (30D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g0a2
Figure A3. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (50D).
Figure A3. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (50D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g0a3aBiomimetics 10 00504 g0a3b
Figure A4. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (100D).
Figure A4. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 (100D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g0a4

References

  1. Xie, L.; Han, T.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.-R.; Han, B.; Tang, A. Tuna Swarm Optimization: A Novel Swarm-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, 2021, 210050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, A.; Zhou, H.; Han, T.; Xie, L. A Chaos Sparrow Search Algorithm with Logarithmic Spiral and Adaptive Step for Engineering Problems. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 130, 331–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lehmann, T.H. Mathematical Modelling as a Vehicle for Eliciting Algorithmic Thinking. Educ. Stud. Math. 2024, 115, 151–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Droste, S.; Jansen, T.; Wegener, I. Upper and Lower Bounds for Randomized Search Heuristics in Black-Box Optimization. Theory Comput. Syst. 2006, 9, 525–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, A.-D.; Han, T.; Zhou, H.; Xie, L. An Improved Equilibrium Optimizer with Application in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning. Sensors 2021, 21, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Y.; Han, T.; Tang, S.; Huang, C.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y. An Improved Differential Evolution by Hybridizing with Estimation-of-Distribution Algorithm. Inf. Sci. 2023, 619, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hernández, D.S.; García-Muñoz, J.A.; Gutiérrez, A.I.B. Evaluation of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Applied to Path Planning. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2024, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qiao, L.; Liu, K.; Xue, Y.; Tang, W.; Salehnia, T. A Multi-Level Thresholding Image Segmentation Method Using Hybrid Arithmetic Optimization and Harris Hawks Optimizer Algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 241, 122316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar Sahoo, S.; Houssein, E.H.; Premkumar, M.; Kumar Saha, A.; Emam, M.M. Self-Adaptive Moth Flame Optimizer Combined with Crossover Operator and Fibonacci Search Strategy for COVID-19 CT Image Segmentation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 227, 120367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abualigah, L.; Habash, M.; Hanandeh, E.S.; Hussein, A.M.A.; Al Shinwan, M.; Zitar, R.A.; Jia, H. Improved Reptile Search Algorithm by Salp Swarm Algorithm for Medical Image Segmentation. J. Bionic Eng. 2023, 20, 1766–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nair, A.T.; Arivazhagan, M. Industrial Activated Sludge Model Identification Using Hyperparameter-Tuned Metaheuristics. SWARM Evol. Comput. 2024, 91, 101733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al Bannoud, M.; da Silva, C.A.M.; Martins, T.D. Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Model Predictive Control for Chemical Engineering Processes: A Systematic Review. Annu. Rev. Control 2024, 58, 100973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mumtahina, U.; Alahakoon, S.; Wolfs, P. Hyperparameter Tuning of Load-Forecasting Models Using Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms-A Systematic Review. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, D.; Jia, H.; Abualigah, L.; Xing, Z.; Zheng, R.; Wang, H.; Altalhi, M. Enhance Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization for Tsallis-Entropy-Based Feature Selection Classification Approach. Processes 2022, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jia, H.M.; Zhou, X.L.; Zhang, J.R.; Mirjalili, S. Superb Fairy-Wren Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Feature Selection Problems. Clust. Comput. J. Netw. Softw. Tools Appl. 2025, 28, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Banati, H.; Sharma, R.; Yadav, A. Binary Peacock Algorithm: A Novel Metaheuristic Approach for Feature Selection. J. Classif. 2024, 41, 216–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barua, S.; Merabet, A.; Al-Durra, A.; El-Fouly, T.; El-Saadany, E.F. Levy Arithmetic Optimization for Energy Management of Solar Wind Microgrid with Multiple Diesel Generators for Off-Grid Communities. Appl. Energy 2024, 371, 123736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khezri, E.; Rezaeipanah, A.; Hassanzadeh, H.; Majidpour, J. Towards Load Frequency Management in Thermal Power Systems Using an Improved Open-Source Development Model Algorithm. Evol. Intell. 2025, 18, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akbulut, L.; Tasdelen, K.; Çosgun, A. Review of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Energy Efficiency, Demand Side Management and Cost Estimation. Rocz. Ochr. Sr. 2025, 27, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ding, W.; Sun, Y.; Ren, L.; Ju, H.; Feng, Z.; Li, M. Multiple Lesions Detection of Fundus Images Based on Convolution Neural Network Algorithm with Improved SFLA. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 97618–97631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Myriam, H.; Abdelhamid, A.A.; El-Kenawy, E.S.M.; Ibrahim, A.; Eid, M.M.; Jamjoom, M.M.; Khafaga, D.S. Advanced Meta-Heuristic Algorithm Based on Particle Swarm and Al-Biruni Earth Radius Optimization Methods for Oral Cancer Detection. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 23681–23700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nanda, S.J.; Gulati, I.; Chauhan, R.; Modi, R.; Dhaked, U. A K-Means-Galactic Swarm Optimization-Based Clustering Algorithm with Otsu’s Entropy for Brain Tumor Detection. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2019, 33, 152–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, P. An Electronic Nose System for the Monitoring of Water Cane Shoots Quality with Swarm Clustering Algorithm. J. Food Saf. 2021, 41, e12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Irshad, R.R.; Alattab, A.A.; Alsaiari, O.A.S.; Sohail, S.S.; Aziz, A.; Madsen, D.Ø.; Alalayah, K.M. An Optimization-Linked Intelligent Security Algorithm for Smart Healthcare Organizations. Healthcare 2023, 11, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Belardi, V.G.; Trupiano, S.; Fanelli, P.; Vivio, F. Overall Elastic Characterization of Equivalent FE Models for Aluminum Foams through Computational Homogenization Approach and Genetic Algorithm Optimization. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 2024, 103, 105189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peng, Y.; Li, T.; Hou, L.; Wang, K.; Xie, G.; Zhang, H. Bio-Inspired Cellular Thin-Walled Structures under Impact Loading: Modeling and Multi-Stage Cooperative Optimization Algorithm. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2024, 31, 4737–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Holland, J.H. Genetic Algorithms. Sci. Am. 1992, 267, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Opara, K.R.; Arabas, J. Differential Evolution: A Survey of Theoretical Analyses. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2019, 44, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahvanooey, M.T.; Li, Q.; Wu, M.; Wang, S. A Survey of Genetic Programming and Its Applications. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2019, 13, 1765–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beyer, H.-G.; Beyer, H.-G.; Schwefel, H.-P.; Schwefel, H.-P. Evolution Strategies—A Comprehensive Introduction. Nat. Comput. 2002, 1, 3–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, H.; Zhang, Q.K. Alpha Evolution: An Efficient Evolutionary Algorithm with Evolution Path Adaptation and Matrix Generation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 137, 109202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sulaiman, M.H.; Mustaffa, Z.; Saari, M.M.; Daniyal, H.; Mirjalili, S. Evolutionary Mating Algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 487–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C.D.; Vecchi, M.P. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wei, Z.; Huang, C.; Wang, X.; Han, T.; Li, Y. Nuclear Reaction Optimization: A Novel and Powerful Physics-Based Algorithm for Global Optimization. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 66084–66109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Braik, M.; Al-Hiary, H.; Alzoubi, H.; Hammouri, A.; Al-Betar, M.A.; Awadallah, M.A. Tornado Optimizer with Coriolis Force: A Novel Bio-Inspired Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2025, 58, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, C.; Zhao, D.; Heidari, A.A.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H. Polar Lights Optimizer: Algorithm and Applications in Image Segmentation and Feature Selection. Neurocomputing 2024, 607, 128427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sowmya, R.; Premkumar, M.; Jangir, P. Newton-Raphson-Based Optimizer: A New Population-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm for Continuous Optimization Problems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 128, 107532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdel-Basset, M.; Mohamed, R.; Sallam, K.M.; Chakrabortty, R.K. Light Spectrum Optimizer: A Novel Physics-Inspired Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faramarzi, A.; Heidarinejad, M.; Stephens, B.; Mirjalili, S. Equilibrium Optimizer: A Novel Optimization Algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2020, 191, 105190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cymerys, K.; Oszust, M. Attraction–Repulsion Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization Problems. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2024, 84, 101459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hashim, F.A.; Houssein, E.H.; Mabrouk, M.S.; Al-Atabany, W.; Mirjalili, S. Henry Gas Solubility Optimization: A Novel Physics-Based Algorithm. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 101, 646–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kundu, R.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Nag, S.; Navarro, M.A.; Oliva, D. Prism Refraction Search: A Novel Physics-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm. J. Supercomput. 2024, 80, 10746–10795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rao, R.V.; Savsani, V.J.; Vakharia, D.P. Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization: A Novel Method for Constrained Mechanical Design Optimization Problems. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2011, 43, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ni, L.; Ping, Y.; Yao, N.; Jiao, J.; Wang, G. Literature Research Optimizer: A New Human-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm for Optimization Problems. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2024, 49, 12817–12865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trojovský, P. A New Human-Based Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems Based on Preschool Education. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Das, B.; Mukherjee, V.; Das, D. Student Psychology Based Optimization Algorithm: A New Population Based Optimization Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2020, 146, 102804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, X.; Li, S.B.; Jiang, X.H.; Zhou, Y.Q. Information Acquisition Optimizer: A New Efficient Algorithm for Solving Numerical and Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems. J. Supercomput. 2024, 80, 25736–25791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, Z.; Gai, M. Football Team Training Algorithm: A Novel Sport-Inspired Meta-Heuristic Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 245, 123088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Soundhara Raja Pandian, R.; Christopher Columbus, C. Rider Optimization Algorithm Based Optimal Cloud Server Selection in E-Learning. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 2023, 44, 1749–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ouyang, K.; Fu, S.; Chen, Y.; Cai, Q.; Heidari, A.A.; Chen, H. Escape: An Optimization Method Based on Crowd Evacuation Behaviors. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 58, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Javed, S.T.; Zafar, K.; Younas, I. Kids Learning Optimizer: Social Evolution and Cognitive Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 2024, 36, 17417–17465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, D.; Wang, S.; Zhou, C.; Yan, S.; Xue, J. Human Memory Optimization Algorithm: A Memory-Inspired Optimizer for Global Optimization Problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 237, 121597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, W.; Xu, J. Particle Swarm Optimization. In Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Abasi, A.K.; Makhadmeh, S.N.; Al-Betar, M.A.; Alomari, O.A.; Awadallah, M.A.; Alyasseri, Z.A.A.; Doush, I.A.; Elnagar, A.; Alkhammash, E.H.; Hadjouni, M. Lemurs Optimizer: A New Metaheuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heidari, A.A.; Mirjalili, S.; Faris, H.; Aljarah, I.; Mafarja, M.; Chen, H. Harris Hawks Optimization: Algorithm and Applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 97, 849–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tian, A.Q.; Liu, F.F.; Lv, H.X. Snow Geese Algorithm: A Novel Migration-Inspired Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems. Appl. Math. Model. 2024, 126, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bai, J.F.; Nguyen-Xuan, H.; Atroshchenko, E.; Kosec, G.; Wang, L.H.; Wahab, M.A. Blood-Sucking Leech Optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2024, 195, 103696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.B.; San, H.J.; Chen, J.P.; Sun, H.J.; Ding, L.; Wu, X.M. Black Eagle Optimizer: A Metaheuristic Optimization Method for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems. Clust. Comput. J. Netw. Softw. Tools Appl. 2024, 27, 12361–12393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Al-Betar, M.A.; Awadallah, M.A.; Braik, M.S.; Makhadmeh, S.; Doush, I.A. Elk Herd Optimizer: A Novel Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithm. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hu, G.; Cheng, M.; Houssein, E.H.; Hussien, A.G.; Abualigah, L. SDO: A Novel Sled Dog-Inspired Optimizer for Solving Engineering Problems. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2024, 62, 102783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Mirjalili, S.; Khodadadi, N.; Cao, Q. Electric Eel Foraging Optimization: A New Bio-Inspired Optimizer for Engineering Applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 238, 122200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Örnek, B.N.; Aydemir, S.B.; Düzenli, T.; Özak, B. A Novel Version of Slime Mould Algorithm for Global Optimization and Real World Engineering Problems Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm. Math. Comput. Simul. 2022, 198, 253–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mostafa, M.; Rezk, H.; Aly, M.; Ahmed, E.M. A New Strategy Based on Slime Mould Algorithm to Extract the Optimal Model Parameters of Solar PV Panel. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 42, 100849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yu, T.Y.; Pan, J.W.; Qian, Q.; Song, M.; Yin, J.B.; Feng, Y.; Fu, Y.F.; Li, Y.N. Improved Slime Mould Algorithm by Perfecting Bionic-Based Mechanisms. Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput. 2023, 22, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, H.M.; Wang, Z.; Jia, H.M.; Zhou, X.D.; Abualigah, L. Hybrid Slime Mold and Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm with Random Center Learning and Restart Mutation. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alhashash, K.M.; Samma, H.; Suandi, S.A. MSMA: Merged Slime Mould Algorithm for Solving Problems. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2024, 15, 501–516. [Google Scholar]
  67. Conteh, I.M.; Njai, G.; Conteh, A.; Du, Q.G. An Optimized Feature Selection Using Triangle Mutation Rule and Restart Strategy in Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm. Egypt. Inform. J. 2025, 30, 100709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.R.; Yao, M.; Fan, G.L. A Self-Adaptive Improved Slime Mold Algorithm for Multi-UAV Path Planning. Drones 2025, 9, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Duan, Z.X.; Qian, X.Z.; Song, W. Multi-Strategy Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm for Optimization Problems. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 7850–7871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mirjalili, S.; Mirjalili, S.M.; Lewis, A. Grey Wolf Optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2014, 69, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, X.; Lin, Z.; Lv, H.; Yu, L.; Heidari, A.A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Liang, G. Advanced Slime Mould Algorithm Incorporating Differential Evolution and Powell Mechanism for Engineering Design. iScience 2023, 26, 107736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Deng, L.; Liu, S. A Multi-Strategy Improved Slime Mould Algorithm for Global Optimization and Engineering Design Problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023, 404, 115764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Naik, M.K.; Panda, R.; Abraham, A. An Entropy Minimization Based Multilevel Colour Thresholding Technique for Analysis of Breast Thermograms Using Equilibrium Slime Mould Algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 113, 107955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Naik, M.K.; Panda, R.; Abraham, A. Normalized Square Difference Based Multilevel Thresholding Technique for Multispectral Images Using Leader Slime Mould Algorithm. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 34, 4524–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Son, P.V.H.; Khoi, L.N.Q. Adaptive Opposition Slime Mold Algorithm for Time–Cost–Quality–Safety Trade-off for Construction Projects. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 2023, 24, 1927–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yin, S.; Luo, Q.; Zhou, Y. EOSMA: An Equilibrium Optimizer Slime Mould Algorithm for Engineering Design Problems. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 47, 10115–10146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tang, A.-D.; Tang, S.Q.; Han, T.; Zhou, H.; Xie, L. A Modified Slime Mould Algorithm for Global Optimization. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, 2021, 2298215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yin, S.; Luo, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhou, Y. DTSMA: Dominant Swarm with Adaptive T-Distribution Mutation-Based Slime Mould Algorithm. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2022, 19, 2240–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sadiq, A.S.; Dehkordi, A.A.; Mirjalili, S.; Pham, Q.V. Nonlinear Marine Predator Algorithm: A Cost-Effective Optimizer for Fair Power Allocation in NOMA-VLC-B5G Networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 203, 117395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hu, G.; Yang, R.; Abbas, M.; Wei, G. BEESO: Multi-Strategy Boosted Snake-Inspired Optimizer for Engineering Applications. J. Bionic Eng. 2023, 20, 1791–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bakır, H. Dynamic Fitness-Distance Balance-Based Artificial Rabbits Optimization Algorithm to Solve Optimal Power Flow Problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 240, 122460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, C.; Yang, H.; Zhu, D.; Hu, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, H.Y.; Zhang, D. A Multi-Mechanism Balanced Advanced Learning Sparrow Search Algorithm for UAV Path Planning. Clust. Comput. 2024, 27, 6623–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lou, T.S.; Wang, Y.; Guan, G.S.; Lu, Y.B.; Qi, R.L. A Physically Hybrid Strategy-Based Improved Snow Ablation Optimizer for UAV Trajectory Planning. J. Bionic Eng. 2024, 21, 2985–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Deng, L.Y.; Liu, S.Y. Advancing Photovoltaic System Design: An Enhanced Social Learning Swarm Optimizer with Guaranteed Stability. Comput. Ind. 2025, 164, 104209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Deng, L.Y.; Liu, S.Y. A Sine Cosine Algorithm Guided by Elite Pool Strategy for Global Optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 2024, 164, 111946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nadimi-Shahraki, M.H.; Taghian, S.; Mirjalili, S. An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer for Solving Engineering Problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 166, 113917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oladejo, S.O.; Ekwe, S.O.; Mirjalili, S. The Hiking Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Human-Based Metaheuristic Approach. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2024, 296, 111880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Karami, H.; Anaraki, M.V.; Farzin, S.; Mirjalili, S. Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA): A Novel Optimization Approach for Solving Optimization Problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 156, 107224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Versaci, M.; Laganà, F.; Morabito, F.C.; Palumbo, A.; Angiulli, G. Adaptation of an Eddy Current Model for Characterizing Subsurface Defects in CFRP Plates Using FEM Analysis Based on Energy Functional. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lagana, F.; Pellicano, D.; Arruzzo, M.; Pratticò, D.; Pullano, S.A.; Fiorillo, A.S. FEM-Based Modelling and AI-Enhanced Monitoring System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Electronics 2025, 14, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bibbò, L.; Angiulli, G.; Laganà, F.; Pratticò, D.; Cotroneo, F.; La Foresta, F.; Versaci, M. MEMS and IoT in HAR: Effective Monitoring for the Health of Older People. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pratticò, D.; Laganà, F.; Oliva, G.; Fiorillo, A.S.; Pullano, S.A.; Calcagno, S.; De Carlo, D.; La Foresta, F. Integration of LSTM and U-Net Models for Monitoring Electrical Absorption With a System of Sensors and Electronic Circuits. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2025, 74, 2533311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Laganà, F.; Bibbò, L.; Calcagno, S.; De Carlo, D.; Pullano, S.A.; Pratticò, D.; Angiulli, G. Smart Electronic Device-Based Monitoring of SAR and Temperature Variations in Indoor Human Tissue Interaction. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Summary of metaheuristic algorithms.
Figure 1. Summary of metaheuristic algorithms.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g001
Figure 2. The flowchart of the BWSMA.
Figure 2. The flowchart of the BWSMA.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g002
Figure 3. Friedman rankings of BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
Figure 3. Friedman rankings of BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g003
Figure 4. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 test suite.
Figure 4. Convergence curve of BWSMA and its derived algorithms on CEC2018 test suite.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g004aBiomimetics 10 00504 g004b
Figure 5. Algorithm performance-sorting radar chart of BWSMA and SMA variants.
Figure 5. Algorithm performance-sorting radar chart of BWSMA and SMA variants.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g005aBiomimetics 10 00504 g005b
Figure 6. Friedman rankings of BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Figure 6. Friedman rankings of BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g006
Figure 7. Nemenyi test results of BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Figure 7. Nemenyi test results of BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g007
Figure 8. Algorithm performance-sorting radar chart of BWSMA and other improved algorithms.
Figure 8. Algorithm performance-sorting radar chart of BWSMA and other improved algorithms.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g008
Figure 9. Boxplots of BWSMA and improved algorithm based on CEC2022 (10D).
Figure 9. Boxplots of BWSMA and improved algorithm based on CEC2022 (10D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g009
Figure 10. Boxplots of BWSMA and improved algorithm based on CEC2022 (20D).
Figure 10. Boxplots of BWSMA and improved algorithm based on CEC2022 (20D).
Biomimetics 10 00504 g010
Figure 11. Tension/compression spring design structure.
Figure 11. Tension/compression spring design structure.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g011
Figure 12. Pressure vessel design problem structure.
Figure 12. Pressure vessel design problem structure.
Biomimetics 10 00504 g012
Table 1. Friedman test results obtained by BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
Table 1. Friedman test results obtained by BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
Test SuiteDimensionSMASMA-AGMSMA-BWSSMA-SRMBWSMAp-Value
CEC2018104.5524.0002.1033.0691.2763.33E−17
304.2413.6212.5523.5521.0345.22E−15
504.6213.6212.3103.3791.0691.26E−17
1004.5173.4142.7243.1381.2079.33E−14
CEC2022104.1673.5832.5833.1671.5005.15E−04
204.6673.4172.3333.5001.0834.36E−07
Mean rank4.4613.6092.4343.3011.195N/A
Overall rank54231N/A
Table 2. Wilcoxon rank-sum test results obtained by BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
Table 2. Wilcoxon rank-sum test results obtained by BWSMA and its derived algorithms (a = 0.05).
vs. SMA
+/=/−
CEC-2018 Test SuiteCEC-2022 Test Suite
10D30D50D100D10D20D
SMA-AGM9/19/17/22/08/21/021/7/14/8/04/8/0
SMA-BWS26/2/119/8/224/5/022/7/09/3/010/2/0
SMA-SRM21/5/318/6/518/8/322/1/65/4/34/5/3
BWSMA29/0/029/0/028/1/028/1/011/1/012/0/0
Table 3. Parameter settings of SMA variants.
Table 3. Parameter settings of SMA variants.
AlgorithmParameter Settings
BWSMA S i n i = 0.5
PSMADE [71] z = 0.03 , β min = 0.4 , β max = 1 , C R = 0.5
MSSMA [72] z = 0.03 , E = 100 , N s = 10
ESMA [73] z = 0.03
LSMA [74] z = 0.03
AOSMA [75] z = 0.03
EOSMA [76] z = 0.6 , q = 0.2 , G P = 0.5
ISMA [77] z = 0.03 , S max = N , S min = 0.5 N
DTSMA [78] z = 0.03 , C r = 0.5 , q = 0.9
Table 4. Wilcoxon rank-sum test results obtained by BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Table 4. Wilcoxon rank-sum test results obtained by BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
BWSMA vs. +/=/−DimensionPSMADEMSSMAESMALSMAAOSMAEOSMAISMADTSMA
CEC-2018 test suite10D24/5/029/0/029/0/028/0/129/0/024/4/125/2/228/1/0
30D24/3/228/1/028/1/029/0/029/0/028/1/027/2/029/0/0
50D25/2/227/2/029/0/028/1/029/0/029/0/029/0/029/0/0
100D19/4/626/2/123/6/029/0/029/0/029/0/029/0/029/0/0
Table 5. Friedman test results obtained by BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
Table 5. Friedman test results obtained by BWSMA and SMA variants (a = 0.05).
AlgorithmCEC-2018 Test Suite
10D30D50D100DMean RankOverall Rank
BWSMA1.4141.1381.0691.4141.2591
PSMADE3.7934.5864.2073.3793.9912
MSSMA5.8974.8624.5863.8624.8025
ESMA6.0003.6213.1383.2073.9912
LSMA6.3105.5525.5865.7595.8026
AOSMA8.0348.0697.9667.4147.8719
EOSMA3.7936.5867.1038.0006.3717
ISMA5.7596.5526.6556.5866.3888
DTSMA4.0004.0344.6905.3794.5264
p-value1.92E−211.90E−232.79E−267.65E−28N/AN/A
Table 6. Parameter settings of improved algorithms.
Table 6. Parameter settings of improved algorithms.
AlgorithmParameter Settings
NMPA [79] F A D s = 0.2 , P = 0.5
BEESO [80] a = 0.25 , b = 0.6 , c 1 = 0.5 , c 2 = 0.05 , c 3 = 2
FDBARO [81] w = 0.5
WOSSA [82] p = 0.2
PHISAO [83] a = 0.2 , b = 0.8
ESLPSO [84] C R = 0.5 , F = 0.5 , c = 0.1 , M = N
EPSCA [85] a = 2 , β = 0.5 , c = 0.5 , d = 1.2
IGWO [86]N/A
Table 7. Statistical test results of BWSMA and other improved algorithms.
Table 7. Statistical test results of BWSMA and other improved algorithms.
AlgorithmCEC-2022 Test Suite
Friedman TestWilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
10D20DMean RankOverall Rank10D20D
BWSMA2.5831.8332.2081BWSMA vs. +/=/−
BWSMA5.6676.5006.08379/2/111/1/0
NMPA5.3335.6675.50068/2/211/1/0
BEESO5.3337.5006.41789/2/111/1/0
FDBARO7.0006.6676.83399/2/110/2/0
WOSSA4.3333.9174.12525/4/39/2/1
PHISAO5.0004.1674.58347/3/29/1/2
ESLPSO4.9175.0004.95857/4/19/1/2
EPSCA4.8333.7504.29239/1/210/2/0
p-value2.46E−022.83E−06N/AN/AN/AN/A
Table 8. Experimental results of tension/compression spring design structure.
Table 8. Experimental results of tension/compression spring design structure.
AlgorithmOptimal Values for VariableOptimal ValueRanking
dDN
BWSMA5.171E−023.559E−011.132E+011.268E−021
SMA5.301E−023.842E−011.001E+011.298E−028
ESMA5.171E−023.573E−011.128E+011.272E−024
PSMADE5.163E−023.549E−011.141E+011.269E−023
DTSMA5.191E−023.630E−011.101E+011.270E−025
PHISAO5.142E−023.500E−011.171E+011.273E−026
EPSCA5.231E−023.722E−011.050E+011.271E−027
WOSSA5.159E−023.550E−011.141E+011.271E−022
Table 9. Experimental results of pressure vessel design problem structure.
Table 9. Experimental results of pressure vessel design problem structure.
AlgorithmOptimal Values for VariableOptimal ValueRanking
TsThRL
BWSMA7.781E−013.850E−014.030E+012.001E+025.890E+031
SMA7.929E−014.101E−014.100E+011.911E+026.879E+038
ESMA7.780E−013.850E−014.030E+012.000E+025.971E+033
PSMADE7.931E−013.920E−014.101E+011.901E+026.290E+035
DTSMA7.780E−013.851E−014.030E+012.000E+025.892E+032
PHISAO7.789E−013.851E−014.039E+012.000E+026.081E+034
EPSCA8.830E−014.401E−014.571E+011.371E+026.310E+036
WOSSA7.801E−013.850E−014.038E+011.991E+026.442E+037
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Meng, H.; Wang, D.; Fu, B.; Shao, Y.; Liu, Z. An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best–Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems. Biomimetics 2025, 10, 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10080504

AMA Style

Li T, Meng H, Wang D, Fu B, Shao Y, Liu Z. An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best–Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems. Biomimetics. 2025; 10(8):504. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10080504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Tongzheng, Hongchi Meng, Dong Wang, Bin Fu, Yuanyuan Shao, and Zhenzhong Liu. 2025. "An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best–Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems" Biomimetics 10, no. 8: 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10080504

APA Style

Li, T., Meng, H., Wang, D., Fu, B., Shao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2025). An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best–Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems. Biomimetics, 10(8), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10080504

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop