2. Feeding the Fever
2.1. Genealogy as Culture
This warning echoes the pathological debate above and also frames the relationship between expert advisors and hobbyist consumers. Such a definition of roles reinforces the themes that Mills critiqued in 2003 when applied in a cultural paintbrush across genealogy. A drive to be helpful and relevant leads commercial companies to offer tools and strategies.Once you’ve been bitten by the bug you’ll find it hard to stop. Read these articles to discover expert research techniques and enjoy the hobby even more.2
This offering is heavy with laden terms that set and potentially limit expectation, for instance ‘pedigree’ which speaks of bloodlines, which in a society still pre-loaded with patriarchy directs attention to male lineages. Other commercial genealogy company advice directs the user to consider siblings and seek to discover the original names of brides. This entry level learning then is settled within an overall framing of genealogy as a series of nuclear-family households.Family Group Sheet—Each piece of information concerning a pedigree ancestor and his/her family is placed on a worksheet. Since the result of your research efforts will be to compile complete, correct and connected families, the use of family group sheets from the beginning will make the compilation much easier.
Genealogy allows people to personalise the past, genealogists have told me: ‘I hated history at school. It was just a series of dates with no connection to my life.’ But then they’ve discovered that their great uncle won a medal during the First World War, and the place where he fought immediately becomes more than just another battlefield.5
2.2. Genealogist Profession
She went on to identify that even on the occasions when historians stepped forward to pass positive light on the work of genealogists, it was often a backhanded compliment. The proffered cure for the condition was to educate the genealogist as a professional to bring them in line with historians and archivists. The latter of which had undergone a process of professionalisation in recent decades. Mills’ agenda from fifteen years ago was to develop generational history through a professionalisation based upon scholarship rather than accountability to consumers, as a means to draw distinctions between collectors of names, compilers of lineage references and scholars of how people lived as and through family networks.We now stand at a threshold and face a critical choice. Are we content for other disciplines to dismiss genealogy as an “ego trip”—History Lite? Will we accept a role some others propose for us—that of Data Sweeper, mere drudge labor to boost the productivity of “real” historians?
Noticeably, what underpins the prescription is a remedy that is focused on fixing the genealogist as the fever creates an environment in which they are disrespected. The deleterious elements she identified, a deep-rooted outmoded and outdated prejudice from academic history, actually infects the non-genealogist.This proposed identity should distinguish our discipline from the gathering of names and creation of databases that has come to characterize “genealogy” in both popular and academic minds. Adopting the term, however, would carry responsibility…1. meet the historical profession’s definition of “historian”—an individual with some formal education in history, who practices history through research or teaching;2. possess earned credentials in genealogy (certification or accreditation) and, as such programs develop, pursue coursework and degrees in generational history;3. publish their research in peer-reviewed journals whose essays meet the standards set for scholarship by the academic world
Credentials—our researchers are handpicked, tested and trained to ensure they meet our unwavering commitment to quality. Our researchers possess four-year degrees in Family History and Genealogy, accreditations, or decades of experience, and share a passion for genealogy research.8
In a commercially sound fashion, it is embedded into spaces likely to be noticed by tree-climbers, often taking the form of lineage-maker genealogists seeking to monetise their skills, discussing courses from which they draw credentials.10 The question is whether, by design or by default, hobbyist tree-climbers have been exposed to the genealogical culture of professionalism that may have influenced perceptions.I acknowledged overlaps with social and political history, but the trained genealogist in me always drew me back to the individuals in these big histories. It put the flesh on the bones.9
2.3. British Manifestation
RQG stresses that its members,The report you receive from a professional genealogist should give details of the research you requested plus a description of the work carried out, including full references of any records consulted. Copies of relevant records are usually supplied. A conclusion and suggestions for further research should also be given.13
Operating at post-graduate level they take already experienced, mature students and expose them to systematic methods of investigation and critical analysis of results so they can deliver quality outcomes from any research.
A professional scholarly agenda though is more evident in the aims and objectives of RQG’s peer-reviewed journal. The pressure of professionalism with a reliance on accredited learning, if not formal education was captured by James Hansen, a Mills collaborator in 2001. In the introduction to Professional Genealogy: A Manual for Researchers, Writers, Editors, lecturers and librarians, he stressed a distinction between experienced genealogists and the professional (Mills 2001).Graduates emerge with a good understanding of all relevant disciplines and with the confidence to tackle all aspects of even the most wide-ranging projects, and to report on findings clearly and succinctly.
2.4. Before the Famine
2.4.1. Feast upon the Fever Repast
2.4.2. Unwitting Contribution
3. Servicing the Fever
3.1. Handle with Care
The Kindred Britain project is a useful example of this (Jenkins n.d.)16.However, academic genealogy is not merely an independent discipline, but rather a research field that juxtaposes many disciplines, like history, geography, literature, computer science, information science, linguistics.
3.2. Visualising Genealogy Outputs
If the former is true, then genealogies on a large scale merely present a useful pre-built extensive and complex set of data to test proposed technology against for application elsewhere. If the latter is true and the systems are a useful addition to genealogy, then what is the purpose of being able to appreciate and analyse genealogies outside of the context of family domestic households and groups.There have been many methods proposed to visualize the family trees. The most widespread visualizations are based on node-link diagrams, which focus on the layout of the family tree structure to explore the relationships among persons.
Unfortunately, Kindred Britain and other projects have overlooked the anthropological and continental European challenges to notions of Euroamerican kinship in their design concept. The GeneaQuilts team pointed to a classic conundrum of this, the idea of the family of England’s Henry VIII. Both the product of a commercial genealogical company and GeneaQuilts would group the 1520–1540 Tudor Royals as a family, which is simply an unsustainable correlation with understandings in recent centuries. Therefore, genealogical education needs to be careful not to reinforce dubious notions of the family, patrilineage or bloodline in the public discourse. Joseph Amato was keen that it should be understood that the formed social institution of the family was preceded by concepts of different social belongings anchored to collectivity and locality. Amato challenged genealogists indiscriminately to, ‘discard the regressive search for noble origins and pure lineages, we come to know ourselves literally as the makers of our family and the definers of family tradition.’ This leaves the following questions: What is genealogy if it is something other than the collecting of names, dates and interlinked egos? What is disguised by the fuzzy language of kinship, family, relatedness, cousin, mother, brother (Hirschfeld 1986, pp. 217–42), that those who practice genealogy can assist to resolve by interrogating their outputs?Only over the courses of centuries, starting with the wealthy, has the family been transformed into a social institution that fostered the individual and the intimate person.
4. Final Thoughts
The uncertain position and status that a professional education was meant to address for the genealogy of a scholarly character has not occurred within the British and Irish contexts. As the prescribed cure for marginalised genealogy was not directed at the pathology, the historian, but at its victim, the genealogist, the lack of progress is unsurprising. That other fields of academia are more than willing to put scholarly level genealogy at the heart of vast, sprawling projects ought to be inspiring. The challenge is then to develop genealogical education that produces outputs and outcomes through multi-disciplinary efforts that deepen knowledge of past and present societies.Genealogy is a branch of history and worthy of proper study, although this is still disputed by a majority of academic historians.
Conflicts of Interest
- Amato, Joseph. 2008. Rethinking family history. Minnesota History 60: 326–33. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, Robert, and Patrick Beck. 2017. Automatically Recreating Probabilistic History through Genealogy. Available online: https://fhtw.byu.edu/static/conf/2017/ball-recreating-fhtw2017.pdf (accessed on 24 August 2017).
- Bezerianos, Anastasia, Pierre Dragicevic, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Juhee Bae, and Ben Watson. 2010. GeneaQuilts: A system for exploring large genealogies. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16: 1073–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bourdieu, Pierre. 2011. The forms of capital. Cultural Theory: An Anthology 1: 81–93. First published 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Brandes, Ulrik, Linton C. Freeman, and Dorothea Wagner. n.d.26.1 Social Network Analysis. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.438.7600&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 7 September 2017).
- Campbell, William H. 2003. A history of the clan Campbell, volume II: From Flodden to the restoration by Alastair Campbell of airds, A review. The Scottish Historical Review 82: 310–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chelliah, John. 2017. Will artificial intelligence usurp white collar jobs? Human Resource Management International Digest 25: 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, Di, and Moira Donald. 1995. Households and ‘hidden’ kin in early-nineteenth century England: Four case studies in suburban Exeter, 1821–1861. Continuity and Change 10: 257–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidoff, Leonore, Megan Doolittle, Janet Fink, and Katherine Holden. 1998. The Family Story: Blood, Contract and Intimacy. Harlow: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- De Groot, Jerome. 2006. Empathy and enfranchisement: Popular histories. Rethinking History 10: 391–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzsimons, Fiona. 2013. Is family history ‘real’ history? History Ireland 21: 49. [Google Scholar]
- Friday, Kate. 2012. Learning from E-Family History: Online Research Behaviour and Strategies of Family Historians and Implications for Local Studies Collections. Ph.D. Thesis, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK. [Google Scholar]
- Hamberger, Klaus. 2016. Relational sequence networks as a tool for studying gendered mobility patterns. Paper present at the International Conference on Sequence Analysis and Related Methods, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 8–10; pp. 367–381. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, Neil. 2011. Fostering professional formation (professionalism): Lessons from the Carnegie foundation’s five studies on educating professionals. Creighton Law Review 45: 763. [Google Scholar]
- Herskovitz, Arnon. 2012. A suggested taxonomy of genealogy as a multidisciplinary academic research field. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4: 5. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. 1986. Kinship and cognition: Genealogy and the meaning of kinship terms. Current Anthropology 27: 217–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holdsworth, Amy. 2011. Television, Memory, and Nostalgia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins, Nicholas. n.d.Originating Kindred Britain. Available online: http://kindred.stanford.edu/notes.html?section=originating (accessed on 24 July 2017).
- Kim, Nam Wook, Stuart K. Card, and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Tracing genealogical data with TimeNets. Paper presented at the AVI 10, Rome, Italy, May 26–28. [Google Scholar]
- Kramer, Anne-Marie. 2011. Kinship, affinity and connectedness: Exploring the role of genealogy in personal lives. Sociology 45: 379–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipp, Carola, and Lothar Krempel. 2001. Petitions and the social context of political mobilization in the revolution of 1848/49: A microhistorical actor-centred network analysis. International Review of Social History 46: 151–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Little, Hannah. 2007. Archive fever as genealogical fever: Coming home to Scottish archives. Archivaria 64: 89–112. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Yuhua, Sicheng Dai, Changbo Wang, Zhiguang Zhou, and Huamin Qu. 2017. GenealogyVis: A system for visual analysis of multidimensional genealogical data. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 47: 873–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loughran, Maggie. 2009. History of Genealogy/Family History 2009. Available online: http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/articles/family_history.html (accessed on 20 July 2017).
- Mills, Elizabeth Shown. 2001. Professional Genealogy. Baltimore: Genealogical Publ. [Google Scholar]
- Mills, Elizabeth Shown. 2003. Genealogy in the “Information age”: History’s new frontier? National Genealogical Society Quarterly 91: 260–77. [Google Scholar]
- Moody, David. 1986. Scottish Local History—A Introductory Guide. London: B.T. Basford. [Google Scholar]
- O’Day, Rosemary. 1994. The Family and Family History 1500–1900. Themes in Comparitive History. London: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Orr, Clarissa Campbell, John Davis, Andreas Gestrich, Jonathan Petropolous, Torsten Riotte, John Rhl, Daniel Schnpflug, Matthew Seligmann, and Monika Wienfort. 2008. Royal Kinship. Anglo-German Family Networks 1815–1918. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, vol. 4. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, Gregory. 2014. How Genealogy Became almost as Popular as Porn. TIME.com. Available online: http://time.com/133811/how-genealogy-became-almost-as-popular-as-porn/ (accessed on 24 November 2014).
- Sahlins, Marshal. 2013. What Kinship Is-and Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, David Murray, ed. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar]
- Schweitzer, Peter, ed. 2000. Dividends of Kinship: Means and Uses of Social Relatedness. European Association of Social Anthropologists. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Segalen, Martine. 1986. Historical Anthropology of the Family. Translated by J. C. Whitehouse, and Sarah Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro, Warren. 2016. Why Schneiderian kinship studies have it all wrong. Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences 9: 218–39. [Google Scholar]
- Susskind, Richard, and David Susskind. 2015. The Future of the Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Tadmor, Naomi. 2010. Early modern English kinship in the long run: Reflections on continuity and change. Continuity and Change 25: 15–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, Rhodri, and Huw Thomas. 2014. ‘Hollow from the start’? Professional associations and the professionalisation of tourism. The Service Industries Journal 34: 38–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, Richard. 2010. Economic collaboration of family members within and beyond households in English society, 1600–2000. Continuity and Change 25: 83–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watkins, Jeff. 1999. Educating professionals: The changing role of UK professional associations. Journal of Education and Work 12: 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wellman, Barry, and Kenneth Frank. 2001. Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities. Social Capital: Theory and Research, 233–73. [Google Scholar]
Ancestry.co.uk, ‘Help and Advice centre’. http://www.ancestry.co.uk/cs/learning/Advice.
Heather Shore. ‘Telling Stories: From Artful Dodgers to The Secret History of My Family’, ‘Leeds Beckett University’, 3 March 2016. http://mediacentre.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/post/telling-stories-from-artful-dodgers-to-the-secret-history-of-my-family/.
Joseph Bullman. ‘The secret history of my family, the Gadbury sisters’ BBC2, 10th March 2016; BBC Media Centre, ‘Q&A. with Joseph Bullman’. http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2016/secret-history-of-my-family.
http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/ps/cll/cpd/docs/PG_Genealogy_Timetables_2016-17_1-year_final.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2016).
LegacyTree Genealogists. Available online: https://www.legacytree.com/services (accessed on 1 November 2017).
Terry Bridger. ‘A Genealogist of Distinction’, AngliaResearch. Available online: https://www.angliaresearch.co.uk/articles/a-genealogist-of-distinction/ (accessed on 1 November 2017).
‘Professional Genealogy Educational Opportunities (National Institute)’, Familysearch. Available online: https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Professional_Genealogy_Educational_Opportunities_(National_Institute) (accessed on 1 November 2017).
Ancestry.com, ‘1881 Scotland Census’, Parish: Ellon; ED: 2; Page: 1; Line: 14; Roll: cssct1881_58.
Phillip Lawton Sr., a freeman of the city of London, whose life can be tracked across newspapers, Old Bailey court records and his will and testament.
Enclann, ‘Meet the team’, Fiona Fitzsimons. Available online: http://www.eneclann.ie/about-eneclann/meet-the-team/#fiona (accessed on 28 November 2017).
|Mills’ Subgroups||Subgroups Defined by Outputs||Core Educational Concepts|
|Tree-climbers||Armchair builders of vast webs|
|Lineage-makers||Service providers and producers of material for the genealogy market|
|Generational Historians||Genealogy with scholarly impact|
© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).