Next Article in Journal
When Markers Meet Marketing: Ethnicity, Race, Hybridity, and Kinship in Genetic Genealogy Television Advertising
Next Article in Special Issue
Situating Poligen Studies: Between Moral Enquiry and Political Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Review-Discussion of Marco Solinas’s From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy

Persons and Sovereigns in Ethical Thought

School of Arts and Sciences, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA
Genealogy 2017, 1(4), 21;
Received: 18 August 2017 / Revised: 13 November 2017 / Accepted: 16 November 2017 / Published: 20 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beyond Foucault: Excursions in Political Genealogy)
Contemporary concepts of moral personhood prevent us from grappling effectively with contemporary social, political, and moral problems. One way to counter the power of such concepts is to trace their lineage and shifting political investments. This article presents a genealogy of personhood, focusing on the crisis of both personhood and sovereignty in seventeenth-century England. It demonstrates the optionality of personhood for moral thinking and exposes personhood’s functions in political dividing practices. View Full-Text
Keywords: Foucault; sovereignty; personhood; Levellers; Hobbes Foucault; sovereignty; personhood; Levellers; Hobbes
MDPI and ACS Style

McWhorter, L. Persons and Sovereigns in Ethical Thought. Genealogy 2017, 1, 21.

AMA Style

McWhorter L. Persons and Sovereigns in Ethical Thought. Genealogy. 2017; 1(4):21.

Chicago/Turabian Style

McWhorter, Ladelle. 2017. "Persons and Sovereigns in Ethical Thought" Genealogy 1, no. 4: 21.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop