Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Use of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Reducing Rider Stress and Stress-Related Anxiety, Anger, and Worry
Previous Article in Journal
Learning to Drive Safely: Reasonable Expectations and Future Directions for the Learner Period
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Safety 2016, 2(4), 21;

Pike River Mine Disaster: Systems-Engineering and Organisational Contributions

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
Academic Editor: Raphael Grzebieta
Received: 13 May 2016 / Revised: 24 August 2016 / Accepted: 10 October 2016 / Published: 19 October 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [4845 KB, uploaded 19 October 2016]   |  


The Pike River mine (PRM), an underground coal mine in New Zealand (NZ), exploded in 2010. This paper analyses the causes of the disaster, with a particular focus on the systems engineering and organisational contributions. Poor systems-engineering contributed via poorly designed ventilation, use of power-electronics underground, and placement of the main ventilation fan underground. Management rushed prematurely into production even though the technology development in the mine was incomplete. Investment in non-productive infrastructure was deprioritised resulting in inadequate ventilation, and the lack of a viable second emergency egress. The risk assessments were deficient, incomplete, or not actioned. Warnings and feedback from staff were ignored. Risk arises as a consequence of the complex interactions between the components of the sociotechnical system. Organisations will need to strengthen the integrity of their risk management processes at engineering, management, and board levels. The systems engineering perspective shows the interacting causality between the engineering challenges (ventilation, mining method, electrical power), project deliverables, management priorities, organisational culture, and workers’ behaviour. Use of the barrier method provides a new way to examine the risk-management strategies of the mine. The breakdowns in organisational safety management systems are explicitly identified. View Full-Text
Keywords: disaster; prevention; recovery; legislation; directors; systems-engineering disaster; prevention; recovery; legislation; directors; systems-engineering

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pons, D.J. Pike River Mine Disaster: Systems-Engineering and Organisational Contributions. Safety 2016, 2, 21.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Safety EISSN 2313-576X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top