Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Dielectric Properties of Breast Tissues
- Group 1 contained samples with 0–30% adipose tissue (99 samples);
- Group 2 contained samples with 31–84% adipose tissue (84 samples);
- Group 3 contained samples with 85–100% adipose tissue (171 samples).
3. Microwave Breast Imaging
- The use of low-power, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, which does not pose a health risk for patients.
- Hardware utilized is relatively inexpensive.
- The system can be used to detect breast cancer in men.
- The measured signals are sensitive to all tumors and offer a specific contrast for malignancy.
- Using MWI, breast cancer can be detected at an early stage.
- The measurement procedure involves minimal discomfort for patients.
3.1. Passive Microwave Imaging
3.2. Active Microwave Imaging
3.2.1. Microwave Tomography
3.2.2. Radar-Based Microwave Imaging
- Computationally less expensive: MWT has computational challenges as it involves solving an inverse scattering problem to reconstruct an image for the complete profile of the breast’s dielectric properties. However, radar-based MWI does not have such computational challenges because the objective is to simply detect the presence and the location of the backscattered energy source, such as tumors, which occurs due to the difference in dielectric properties between normal and cancerous tissues.
- Higher resolution: Using radar-based imaging systems, a precision of less than 5 mm is expected which is good enough for early detection and localization of breast cancer. This is due to the use of UWB signals. In MWT systems, CW single- or multi-frequency signals are utilized, which limits the resolution.
- Better specificity: Radar-based MWI is able to detect if the lesion is malignant or benign. The scattered waves from benign tumors are not as strong as the ones recorded from malignant tissues. The reason behind this is that the dielectric properties of benign tumors are similar to normal tissues, but different than those of malignant tumors.
- Confocal microwave imaging (CMI): This system was first introduced in 1998 by Hagness et al. [44]. It relies on pulsed confocal techniques and time-gating to enhance the detection of tumors while suppressing tissue heterogeneity and absorption effects. CMI involves using an array of antennas to focus a UWB signal at a potential tumor site, then using the same antennas to collect the scattered microwave energy from the tumor by refocusing it at the point of transmission origin [44]. The work of Hagness et al. [44] involved a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solver to simulate the dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissues (using published dielectric properties values). The FDTD simulations showed that tumors as small as 2 mm in diameter could be detected [44]. In 1999, Hagness and Taflove [45] improved the previous design by using a resistivity bowtie antenna, and performing 3D-FDTD simulations [33]. Further numerical and experimental research in using the CMI system was carried out by Hagness’s group at the University of Wisconsin—Madison.
- Multi-static adaptive (MSA) system: Another series of high-impact radar-based MWI studies were performed by a research group in the University of Bristol [46,47,48]. The developed system used a real aperture array of UWB antennas (the developed system is shown in Figure 6). In 2009, the Bristol University group presented a UWB MWI system for the detection of breast cancer that consisted of 16 UWB aperture-coupled stacked-patch antennas located on a section of a hemisphere. The antennas were arranged this way to improve their conformation to the curve of the breast. The system was tested using realistic 3D breast phantoms and was successful in detecting tumors of 4 to 6 mm in diameter [47]. In 2010, the group conducted a large initial trial of its 31-element prototype radar system at the Breast Care Center in Bristol, UK. Although this system yielded excellent results, the outcomes of the clinical trial were mixed. Some successful detections were made as judged by an independent clinician but the repeatability of these results was lacking. The irreproducibility of the results was attributed to slight patient movements during the 90-second scans together with some uncertainties introduced by variations in blood flow and temperature. To overcome these inadequacies, the group developed a 60-antenna array system, where the increased antenna density was meant to improve the system’s immunity to clutter and shorten acquisition time to 10 seconds. This system underwent extensive clinical trials at the Breast Care Center at Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK. The rapid data acquisition improved the accuracy of the obtained images while also providing a clinical experience that is more convenient and acceptable to patients.
- Tissue-sensing adaptive radar (TSAR): This system was developed and tested by Fear’s group at the University of Calgary et al. [49,50]. TSAR requires two scans of each breast. The breast is suspended through a hole in the examination table into a tank that contains the antenna and is filled with a coupling fluid. The first scan determines the overall location of the breast volume relative to the tank, utilizing the first reflection received at the antenna. The second scan is performed in a coronal fashion progressing from nipple to chest wall providing the data for the tumor detection algorithm [50]. Clinical results showed that TSAR has an ability to detect and localize tumors with sizes greater than 4 mm in diameter. However, this system faced some challenges such as the large reflections caused by the skin, the development of appropriate antennas, and the requirement to develop high-speed electronics for real-time imaging. Current work on TSAR includes development of appropriate sensors, exploration of practical implementation issues, improvement of imaging algorithms, and testing on breast models [40,42].
- Microwave imaging via space–time (MIST) beamforming: This methods involves the sequential transmission of UWB signals from antenna placed near the breast surface. The received backscattered signals are spatially focused using a space–time beamformer. Due to the significant contrast in the dielectric properties of the normal and malignant tissue, localized regions of large backscattered energy levels appear in the reconstructed images, which correspond to malignant tumors [51]. The first MIST system was introduced by Hagness et al. at the University of Wisconsin—Madison [52]. This system yielded promising results in the detection and localization of very small synthetic tumors embedded in breast phantoms. In addition, Bond et al. [51] developed an MIST system for the detection of millimeter-sized tumors in the breast tissue. This system was made of a planar array of 16 horn antennas that transmitted UWB microwave signals consecutively; this design improvement enhanced the robustness against measurement variations, which resulted in clearer imaging of tumors. Further improvements to the system enabled the system to localize, identify, and resolve multiple tumors [42,51].
- Holographic microwave imaging (HMI): In this approach, microwave imaging is performed on two stages: recording of a sampled intensity pattern followed by image reconstruction [53]. The recording of a sampled intensity pattern is performed by combining the signal scattered by the object, such as a tumor, and a reference signal. At microwave frequencies, the reference signal is electronically synthesized [54]. Smith et al. [53,54,55] proposed several HMI systems. Compared to other radar-based MWI techniques, HMI has the ability to produce real-time images at significantly lower cost because it does not require expensive ultra-high-speed electronics. Experimental results using breast phantoms consisting of skin, fat, and embedded tumor-like inclusions revealed the potential of this approach. However, further validation is still required before this technique can be translated to clinical settings. Wang et al. [56,57] provided significant contributions to the investigations into HMI systems. They proposed a 2D holographic MWI array (HMIA) system for early breast tumor detection. The first system they proposed was designed for operations at a single frequency (12.6 GHz) and included one transmitter and an array of 15 receivers placed under the breast phantom. The breast phantom used for testing consisted of homogeneous normal breast tissue, a small embedded malignant tumor, and the skin. The advantage of this system is that it does not require a matching solution medium; thus, air was used between the antennas and breast phantom. The experimental results showed that small tumors with diameter less than 5 mm at different locations could be successfully detected by using the proposed 2D HMIA technique [56]. Their second experiment aimed at investigating the feasibility and effectiveness of combining compressive sensing (CS) with holographic MWI (CS-HMIA). Their findings revealed that CS-HMIA is capable of detecting randomly distributed inclusions, of various shapes and sizes, using smaller number of sensors and shorter scan times [57]. In a more recent study, Wang [58] developed a multi-frequency HMI system and investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for breast imaging. The effectiveness and accuracy of the multi-frequency system was tested and compared to a single-frequency HMI system. The comparative study showed that the multi-frequency HMI could identify and reconstruct small tumors accurately, even when embedded in dense tissue. All of these findings showed that the multi-frequency HMI system has potential as a microwave diagnostic technique.
Author (Year, Location) | MWI Method | Study Type & Dimensions | Frequency Range | Measurement System | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dobrowolski et al. [36] (2004 Military University of Technology | Passive, radiometry | Numerical simulation and phantom study: normal tissues (beef meat) 2D | 1.5–4.4 GHz | Three-band radiometer with mini hypodermic probes with platinum RTD elements. The modeling was performed by numerically solving the thermal radiation transmission equation as a function of brightness. | - As the brightness temperatures fluctuate randomly due to the nature of thermal radiation, the deep-seated profile of temperature distribution estimated from them also fluctuated randomly. - The numerical error was determined using a Monte Carlo technique and the obtained results indicate a possibility of noninvasive detecting and measuring of spatial temperature distribution inside a human body by means of multi-frequency microwave thermograph. |
Bardati and Iudicello [59] (2007, University of Rome Tor Vergata) | Passive, radiometry | Numerical simulation 3D | - | Simulation performed using standard Penne equation and steady state bio-heat equation. | - Radiometer output (difference signal or over temperature) was shown to be a function of tumor depth and size. - Radiometric visibility was found to decrease with tumor depth. - A 10 mm lesion is radiometrically visible if it is no deeper than 2 cm. |
Zhurbenko et al. [60] (2010, Technical University of Denmark) | Passive, radiometry | Phantom study 3D | 300 MHz–3 GHz | Thirty-two monopole-type antenna array system. | - The dielectric properties for water filled spheres were estimated and presented in 3D colormaps. - A reasonable estimation for the locations and shapes of objects-of-interest was obtained. |
Hagness et al. [44] (1998, University of Wisconsin) | Active, CMI | Numerical simulation 2D | - | Monopole antenna and published dielectric properties values were used in 2D FDTD computational electromagnetics analysis. | - In the simulation study, malignant tumors as small as 2 mm in diameter can be detected in the presence of the background clutter generated by tissue heterogeneity. |
Hagness and Taflove [45] (1999, University of Wisconsin) | Active, CMI | Numerical simulation 3D | - | Wide-band bowtie antenna and published dielectric properties values were used in 3D FDTD analysis. | - Simulations proved that the system was found capable to detect early-stage malignant breast tumors. - Malignant tumors are typically asymmetrical while most benign masses are well-circumscribed and compact. - The 3D FDTD simulations indicated the possibility of distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors based on the characteristics of their microwave backscatter response. |
Bulyshev et al. [61,62] (2000–2001, Carolinas Medical Center) | Active, MWT | Numerical simulation 2D, 3D | 2 GHz, 3.5 GHz, and 5 GHz | The Helmholtz equation was used for solving direct problems and the gradient method was used for inverse problem solving. | - Imaged regions close to the array structures, including the malignant zone and skin, were clearly visible. - Tumors of size ≥ 1 cm were clearly detected. - Structures located deeper than 3–4 cm beneath the surface neither appeared on the image nor affected the imaging of the upper layers. - The optimal mesh should be twice as wide as the array. - A smaller mesh tended to distort images. - 3D images of breast can be obtained on the tomographical system in low GHz region with quality sufficient for the small size tumor detection. |
Stuchly et al. [63,64] (2001–2002, University of Victoria) | Active, CMI | Numerical simulation 2D, 3D | - | In the planar system configuration, the patient is oriented in a supine position and a resistively loaded bowtie antenna is used to scan the breast to create a synthetic planar array. In the cylindrical configuration, a resistively loaded dipole antenna was used to scan breast with the patient oriented in a prone position and the breast extending through the examination hole. | - CMI was found to be a feasible tool for detecting and localizing breast tumors in 3D. - Both system configurations showed similar efficiency in detecting and localizing breast tumors. |
Hagness et al. [52] (2003, University of Wisconsin) | Active, MIST | Phantom study | 1–11 GHz | A planar synthetic array of compact UWB antennas are placed on breast phantom with a small (<0.5 cm) synthetic tumor embedded. A data-adaptive algorithm removes the artifact caused by backscatter from the skin–breast interface. The signals were passed through a 3D space-time beamformer designed to image backscattered energy as a function of location. | - The developed system yielded promising results in the detection and localization of very small synthetic tumors embedded in breast phantoms. |
Bond et al. [51,65] (2003–2005, University of Wisconsin) | Active, MIST | Phantom study 2D | - | A planar array of 16 horn sensors and breast phantoms based on anatomically realistic MRI-derived FDTD models of the breast. A data-adaptive algorithm for removing artifacts from backscatter from the skin–breast interface. | - Small lesions can be detected with high sensitivity regardless of location in the breast. - Small tumors embedded in heterogeneous normal breast tissue are successfully detected in a wide range of numerical breast phantoms. - The imaged backscatter from a 2 mm diameter tumor stood out significantly above the clutter generated by the inherent variations in the fibroglandular and adipose composition of the breast. |
Xie et al. [66] (2006) | Active, MSA | Numerical simulation 3D | - | An aperture array transmits and receives microwave pulses. A two-stage data adaptive robust Capon (RCB) algorithm was adopted along with a realistic 3D breast model simulated by the FDTD method. | The system showed better resolution and noise rejection capabilities than existing methods. |
Smith et al. [53,55,67] (2006–2013, Northumbria University) | Active, HMI | Phantom study 2D | 9.4 GHz | Transmitting and receiving antenna were used along with a simulated breast phantom with tumor-like inclusions. | - HMI has the ability to produce real-time images at significantly lower cost because it does not require expensive ultra-high-speed electronics. - Experimental results using simulated breast phantoms provide confidence in the potential of this approach. - More validation is required on the theory and proof-of-concept for medical applications. |
Galvin et al. [68] (2010, University of Ireland Galway) | Active, MIST | Phantom study 2D | - | - A planar array of 16 horn sensors and breast phantoms based on anatomically realistic MRI-derived FDTD models of the breast. - Both the artifact removal algorithm and the beamformer from Bond’s system [69] were modified to provide for multi-static data. | - The system successfully detected the presence of small tumors (5 mm in diameter) at various depths within the heterogeneous breast tissue. - The quasi-multistatic system produces a significantly improved signal-to-clutter ratio when compared to the traditional monostatic MIST beamformer. |
Son et al. [70,71] (2010–2012, Korea) | Active, MWT | Phantom study 2D, 3D | 0.5–3 GHz | 16 monopole transmitting, receiving (TRx) antennas in plane circular arrangement with breast pendant in coupling liquid. Two types of phantoms were used, circular and cylindrical. | - The presented 2D MWT system demonstrated good sensitivity and reasonable spatial resolution of the reconstructed images of the breast and tumor phantoms. - The scattered signals from the small spherical tumor were much smaller than in the case of the cylindrical tumor. - The system was able to detect and reconstruct an image of a 5 mm in diameter spherical tumor phantom. |
Aguilar et al. [72] (2013, University of Wisconsin- Maddison) | Active, CMI | Numerical simulation and phantom study 3D | 1.36–3.03 GHz | 32 multi-band miniaturized slot-loaded patch antennas in a planar layout. | - The study elucidated the trade-off between miniaturization via slot-loading and gain. - The study revealed how the gain of the miniaturized patch antennas varies with the substrate dielectric constant and thickness. - The results of the computational study suggested that miniaturized antennas are suitable candidates as array elements for multi-band microwave breast imaging systems where unidirectional radiation, environmental shielding, and dense spatial sampling of scattered fields are desired. |
Wang et al. [56,57] (2013–2018, Auckland University of Technology and Hefei University of Technology) | Active, HMI | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D | 12.6 GHz | 16-element and 64-element uniform sensor array and breast phantoms based on published dielectric properties with air as the coupling medium. The split Bregman and orthogonal matching pursuit algorithms were applied. | - Small tumors of diameter < 5 mm at different locations could be successfully detected. - Both simulation and experimental results demonstrated that CS-HMAI can produce high-quality images and detect arbitrarily shaped small inclusions with random sizes and locations by using significantly fewer sensors and scanning times than regular HMAI. |
Augusto et al. [73] (2016, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru) | Active, HMI | Phantom study 2D | 2–15 GHz | Both confocal and holographic system algorithms used single Vivaldi antenna for transmission and reception along with breast phantom with tumor-like inclusions. | - Both the confocal and holographic algorithms demonstrated viability for the detection of tumors of diameter ≥ 15 mm. - In the confocal algorithm, the concern is the contrast, while for the holographic algorithm, the concern is locating the tumor phantom without imaginary targets. |
Bucci et al. [41] (2015, University of Naples Federico) | Active, magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced MWI | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D | 2 GHz | Magnetic nanoparticles used as contrast agent along with breast phantoms with tumor-like inclusions. | - The analysis presented provided an optimum design of a measurement device devoted to the implementation of this technique. - Using 50 antennas on each of the eight measurement circles present in the design allowed the measurement of the differential field arising in a MNP-enhanced MWI experiment accurately, which in turn allowed the detection of cancerous tumors. |
Meo et al. [74] (2017, University of Pavia, Italy) | mm-wave frequency system | Numerical simulation 2D | 26.5–40 GHz | 32 antennas in conformal layout and the radiators are open-ended WR28 waveguides. Bio-heat equations and F-DMAS algorithm for image reconstruction. | - A penetration depth of a few cm was achieved. - Conformal layout of antenna better than linear layout. - Estimated tumor position (41 mm) in close agreement with theoretical depth (40 mm). |
Hammouch et al. [75] (2019, Mohammed V University in Rabat) | Active, CMI | Numerical simulation 2D | 3.1–14 GHz | Microstrip patch antenna. | - Results demonstrated the applicability of using CMI for monostatic UWB radar system in breast cancer detection. - Results showed that CMI algorithm is valid for detection and localization of breast tumors. - The method is of lower cost and is considered non-invasive radiation compared to other screening methods. |
Islam et al. [76] (2019, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia) | Active, radar-based | Numerical simulation and phantom study: lab-made heterogeneous tumors 2D | 2.80–7.00 GHz | A compact side slotted tapered slot UWB antenna is designed in which the slot antenna side is minimized. The antenna array, side-slotted Vivaldi, will be sending microwave pulses directed toward the suspected area. (9 antenna array, 8 × 50 scanned position). | - The proposed UWB antenna-based MWI system provided real-time detection of breast tumors. - A significant variation of backscattered signal exploits tumor cells of a breast. - Tumor cells inside breast are detected using the side-slotted Vivaldi antennas. |
Srinivasan et al. [77] (2019, SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology) | Active, dielectric substrate | Numerical simulation 2D, 3D | 2.45 GHz | Wearable jeans material used as dielectric substrate in which an antenna is designed as a sandwish model with slot loaded over patch and ground plane made of copper. | - The study proposed a low-cost textile wearable antenna for breast cancer detection. |
Soltani et al. [78] (2019, University of Waterloo) | Active, microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging (MITAI) | Numerical simulation 3D | 2.45 GHz | Three different breast tissue types along with a tumor were placed in a tank filled with castor oil. The tissues were irradiated by a 2.45 GHz pulsed microwave source from a rectangular waveguide. The generated heat and pressure gradient in the biological tissue due to the electromagnetic wave irradiation were evaluated. | - Thermoacoustic imaging is used to obtain maximum temperature and pressure variation at tumor. - Location of tumor is related to detecting performance in MIRAI method. Tumors located in fatty tissues tend to be easier to detect than other which are located in transitional tissues. - Size of tumor plays a role in detection and performance of MITAI technique. - MITAI method can detect tumors of 0.5 cm diameters. |
Sheeba et al. [79] (2019, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology) | Active | Numerical simulation and phantom study: human skin and breast model (normal and malignant tissues) 2D | 2.4 GHz | Flexible soft-wear hexagonal patch antenna with jean substrate (with and without slot). | - In simulation, the presence and absence of tumor as 20.3 A/m2 and 19 A/m2 and gain as 7.20 and 7.25 dB was noted in breast model in CST. - The existence of the tumor is 25.9 A/m2 and the nonexistence of the tumor is 21.1 A/m2 and the gain is 6.91 dB for with and without tumor is 6.95 dB is noted using CST. |
Geetharamani et al. [80] (2019, Anna University) | Active, metamaterial-inspired Terahertz | Numerical simulation and phantom study: normal and malignant tissues 2D | 1 THz | Metamaterial-inspired THz antenna of a simple rectangular patch configuration integrated with complementary split ring resonator (CSRR). | The experimental technique proposed was able to detect the tumor in the tested breast tissue model. |
Islam et al. [81] (2019, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia) | Active | Numerical simulation and phantom study: lab-made realistic heterogeneous tumors 2D, 3D | 2.7–11.2 GHz | Index Near-Zero Metasurface Loaded High Gain Antenna, 16 antenna arrays, 64 × 50 scanned position. | - An efficient, viable, and low-cost testing system is proposed to detect multiple abnormalities of tumor clusters inside the breast. |
Wang [58] (2019, Hefei University of Technology) | Active, HMI | Numerical simulation 2D, 3D | 1–4 GHz | Small waveguide antenna simulated as a transmitter and detector. | - Multi-frequency HMI algorithm can detect small breast lesions with higher accuracy compared to the single-frequency HMI. - Proposed method improves image resolution which aids in developing vision tool for microwave diagnostic techniques. |
Felício et al. [82] (2020, Universidade de Lisboa) | Active, radar-based | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D, 3D | 2–5 GHz | Dry setup, fixed cylindrical balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna (BAVA) configuration with a diameter of approximately 120 mm, artifact removal algorithm developed, webcam used for breast 3D surface reconstruction. | - Obtained very good detection of the tumor in different positions (maximum positioning error was 10.8 mm) - Lower contrast observed in fibroglandular tissue. - Feasible setup for operation in real exams. |
Abdollahi et al. [83] (2020, University of Manitoba) | Active | Numerical simulation 2D | 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, and 0.95 GHz | Perfect electric conductor (PEC) chamber and 2D transverse magnetic (TM) transceivers in a circular array. | - Tumors were well localized at all frequencies and with all incorporated prior-information maps. - The highest AUC of over 0.99 was obtained for breast model II (fatty breast) while the lowest AUC values correspond to breast model I (heterogeneously dense breast) - For all three breast models, no artifacts were created inside the fatty tissue. |
Oloumi et al. [84] (2020, University of Alberta) | Active, circular synthetic aperture radar (CSAR) | Numerical simulation and phantom study 3D | 1 MHz | UWB radar system (AVTECH AVP-3SA-C pulse generator, Vivaldi antennas, and sampling oscilloscope), a breast phantom, and a matching liquid container (vegetable oil) | - Results from measurements and comparison with MRI image of the phantom demonstrated the capability of this method to improve the image quality. - This experiment did not consider the effect of skin and adipose tissue, but numerical simulations showed that the distortion of the signal was not significant for the given operating frequency. |
Kumari et al. [85] (2020, National Institute of Technology, Delhi, India) | Active, near-field indirect HMI | Phantom study2D | 8.5 GHz | Two Vivaldi antennas used as transmitter and receiver, directional coupler, variable attenuator, phase shifter, a magic Tee, power sensor. | - The developed system was able to identify and locate tumors up to the minimum size of 4 mm and maximum depth of 25 mm in the phantom. |
Ahmed et al. [86] (2020, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq) | Active, radar-based | Numerical simulation and phantom study 3D | 6.1–12 GHz | 18 Peano patch antenna array arranged in a semi-sphere designed by CST Microwave studio simulator. | - More than one antenna was needed around the breast to improve the resolution of the image of the image. - The antenna showed strong pattern of omnidirectional radiation. |
Iliopoulos et al. [87] (2020, University of Rennes, France) | mm-wave frequency system | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D | 20–40 GHz | Transmitting and receiving antennas were manufactured in-house using laser ablation | - Good agreement between simulation and theoretical results. |
Rahpeima et al. [88] (2020, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran) | Active, MITAI | Numerical simulation 3D | 2.45 GHz | Simulations were performed using the COMSOL software. | - More temperature increase detected in tumor area than in the other tissues. - Tumor size did not have a significant impact on the efficiency of detection. - Very small tumors with a radius of 0.25 cm were detectable. - Tumors located in fatty tissues were much easier to detect than those in the glandular tissues. - With augmentation of the irradiation power level or increasing the pulse width, stronger acoustic waves are produced to make tumor detection easier. |
Miraoui et al. [89] (2020, University Mustapha Stambouli, Mascara, Algeria) | Active, radar-based and ANN | Numerical simulation 2D | 4 GHz | Bow-tie antennas for the transmission and reception, CST software used for the simulation. | - The simulation results depicted that the ANN presented more precision in the detection and localization of tumors. |
Coşğun et al. [90] (2020, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, 14030 Turkey) | SPION-enhanced MWI | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D | 1.9–2.02 GHz | 18 vertical dipole antennas placed below the metallic surface of the bed and equidistantly distributed. Breast and antenna suspended in epoxy resin. SPION tracer was used. | - The proposed technique detected much smaller tumors as compared to the operation wavelengths between 1.8 cm and 7.5 cm for the simulation models. - Despite the electric field difference, the factorization method was able to adequately reconstruct spatial variation of SPION tracers in the frontal plane of the breast. |
Kaur and Kaur [91] (2020, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India) | Active, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) | Phantom study 2D | 4.9–10.9 GHz | Three-layered stacked aperture coupled microstrip antenna (SACMPA) with a defected ground structure, a vector network analyzer (VNA), and an anechoic chamber. | - The specific adsorption rate on the breast phantom at the frequencies of 5.7 GHz was 0.271 W/kg and at 6.5 GHz is 1.115 W/kg for 1 g of body tissue. This proved that the antenna was safe for human exposure (below 1.6 W/kg for 1 g). - The antenna experimental measurements show a 93.3% match between the simulated and measured results. |
Kaur and Kaur [92] (2020, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India) | Active, radar-based | Phantom study 3D | 3.71–11.48 GHz | Fork-shaped microstrip patch antenna designed using Computer Simulation Tool: Microwave Studio software (CST MWS) V’18. | - The simulated results show that more reflections, lesser specific absorption rate and more conduction current. - Density was obtained in the presence of tumor as compared to a nonmalignant case. |
Xiao et al. [93] (2020, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China) | MWI with simulated annealing | Numerical simulation and phantom study 2D, 3D | 6 GHz | Patch antenna array working in multi-static mode, pulse pattern generator (Gaussian monocycle pulse), switching matrix, and oscilloscope. | - Owing to simulated annealing algorithm, the proposed method was able to quickly and accurately find the optimal permittivity and achieve the accurate reconstruction of microwave breast image, making the detection process more efficient. |
Mehranpour et al. [94] (2020, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran) | Active, radar-based | Phantom study 2D | 1.3–6.8 GHz | MARIA system with multi-static hemispherical array of modified UWB bowtie antenna. | - The system successfully reconstructed tumor images (with a small radius of 7 mm). - The proposed high-accuracy calibration (HAC) algorithm was better at detecting the cancerous tumor than the WA and WF methods. |
Bocquet et al. [95] (1990, Lille University of Science and Technology) | Passive, radiometry | Clinical trials on 97 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D | 2.5–3.5 GHz | Multi-probe radiometer. | - The acquisition method and software were improved after preliminary experiments on 72 random patients. - For 18 patients, the technique gave good results: the malignant lesions had a radiometric ratio greater than 65%, while the benign lesions were characterized by a ratio smaller than 55%. - Further investigation on seven other patients did not give the same good correlation between the radiometric ratio and the histological characteristics of the tumor. |
Carr et al. [35] (2000, East Virginia Medical School) | Passive, radiometry | Clinical trials on 138 patients: malignant tissues - | - | ONCOSCAN system | - Out of the 138 scans, 16 were excluded for technical malfunctions. - There were 40 benign biopsies with positive ONCOSCAN scores. - The positive predictive value of ONCOSCAN was 41% which was higher than that of the mammography (24%). |
Author (Year, Location) | MWI Method | Study Type & Dimensions | Frequency Range | Measurement System | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meaney et al. [16,29,37,38,39] (2000–2014, Dartmouth College) | Active, MWT | Phantom study and clinical trials on 500+ patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D | 300 MHz–3 GHz | Monopole antenna array: latest system employed 16 transmitting antennas (Tx) and 15 receiving antennas (Rx) with patient lying in prone position and breast pendant in coupling solution. | - The average relative permittivity of the breast may correlate with radiological breast density labels. - The best results were reported at a frequency of 1300 MHz.- In phantom studies, the reconstructed images of the breast phantoms with tumor-like inclusions were quite discernible.- Clinical trials demonstrated that small tumors could be detected, which confirmed that MWI has potential for early-stage breast cancer detection.- In monitoring the progress of neoadjuvant, changes in microwave properties were noticed which agreed well with the overall NCT treatment response. |
Fear et al. [49,50,96] (2003–2012, University of Calgary) | Active, TSAR | Phantom study and clinical trails on 8 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D | 0.05–15 GHz | A single antenna first scans the pendant breast to determine breast volume compared to tank then a second coronal scan is performed for the tumor detection algorithm. Deconvolution is used to determine the thickness of the skin layer. | - Phantom simulated data showed success in reducing the error percentage in both breast skin location and thickness estimates by more than half.- Clinical results showed that TSAR has an ability to detect and localize tumors with sizes > 4 mm in diameter. |
Preece et al. [46,47,48,97] (2008–2016, University of Bristol) | Active, MSA | Phantom study and clinical trials on 86 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D | 4–10 GHz | 16 stacked patch antennas located on a section of a hemisphere to better conform to the curvature of the breast. The patient rested in prone position with breast pendant in a ceramic cup filled with coupling liquid. | - In phantom studies the system was successful at detecting tumors 4 to 6 mm in diameter.- The outcome of the clinical trial with the 31 element prototype was mixed.- The clinical trials with the 60 element system showed improvement in terms of reproducibility and accuracy. |
Porter et al. [98] (2016, McGill University, Canada) | Active | Clinical trials on 3 patients | 2–4 GHz | Multistatic radar with the 16 sensors embedded in a wearable bra. | - Scans were found to be repeatable, yet many sources of variability were identified, such as patient positioning. |
Song et al. [99] (2017, Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan) | Active | Clinical trials on 5 patients 3D | 3.1–10.6 GHz | 4 x 4 cross-shaped dome antennas array designed to be placed on the breast of a supine. Patient with the breast in contact with a plastic dome covering the antennas. | - The 3D tumor localization in the imaging results are in agreement with the results of histopathology analysis. - The final confocal imaging results were consistent with those of MRI. |
Yang et al. [100] (2017, Southern University of Science and Technology, China) | Active | Phantom studies and clinical trials on 11 patients 2D | 4–8.5 GHz | Multi-static virtual array with two ultra-wideband horn antennas controlled by mechanical rotation. | - System was sensitive to the increase in the amount of tissue due to cell proliferation. |
Kuwahara et al. [101] (2017, Shizuoka University, Japan) | Active hybrid MIST-UWB device | Numerical simulation and clinical trials on 2 patients 3D | 1–3 GHz | Breast pendant through an opening in the table directly in contact with stacked patch antennas or a coupling shell of a biocompatible material. | - Data correlation between the measured and calculated data is larger than 0.99. - Images were successfully reconstructed under the experimental conditions. |
Rana et al. [102] (2019, London South Bank University) | Active, radar-based | Numerical simulation study and clinical trials: normal and malignant tissues 2D | 1–9 GHz | Non-ionizing microwave signals are transmitted through breast tissue and scattering parameters are received via moving transmitting and receiving antenna setup. | - Study differentiated between normal breasts and without lesions breasts. - Results obtained from multilayer perceptron algorithm yielded higher overall specificity compared to results obtained from nearest neighbor algorithm. - The employment of machine learning on clinical data helped the radiologists in the diagnosis process and improved the detection sensitivity. |
Sani et al. [103] (2019, Spin off of University of Perugia) | Active | Numerical simulation study and clinical trials: normal and malignant tissues 2D | 1–9 GHz | Apparatus constituted by one transmitting antenna and by one receiving antenna. | - The proposed microwave imaging apparatus based on the Huygens principle is safe as it does not require breast compression and does not emit any ionizing radiation. |
Song et al. [104] (2020, Hiroshima University) | Active, radar-based | Phantom study and clinical trial on 1 patient: malignant tissues 3D | 3.5–15 GHz | Detector composed of a step-motor, a control module, a radio-frequency (RF) module, and a 16-element dome antenna array. | - The proposed method was effective in clutter suppression and improved image quality. - In the clinical test the estimated position of the tumor using the developed system was in good agreement with the physical tumor location examined by MRI and DbPET. |
Vispa et al. [105] (2020, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy) | Active, radar-based | Phantom study and clinical trials on 51 breasts: normal and malignant tissue (7 carcinoma, 9 fibroadenoma, and 5 microcalcifications) 2D | 1–9 GHz | Cup to hold breast, horn Tx antenna and microstrip monopole Rx antenna located inside a hub. Tx and Rx antennas connected to a vector network analyzer (VNA). | - Clinical trials showed that microwave images of non-healthy breasts had a mean MAX/AVG of approximately 7% greater than those of the healthy breasts. |
Norouzzadeh et al. [106] (2020, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran) | Active, transmission radar-based system | Numerical simulation study, and clinical trials on 2 patients: normal and malignant tissue 2D | 1–9 GHz | Two low-loss plexiglass plates for breast compression, two UWB bowtie antennas for transmitting and receiving connected to an HP 8720C vector network analyzer. The whole system was controlled by an iPC25 using a Matlab interface. | - For both patients, comparing the microwave image with the X-ray image confirmed tumor existence. - The attenuation of cancerous region was not constant, indicating that cancerous regions have inhomogeneous dielectric properties. |
4. Image Reconstruction and Quality
4.1. Image Reconstruction
- Delay-and-sum (DAS);
- Delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS);
- Improved delay-and-sum (IDAS);
- Coherence-factor-based DAS (CF-DAS);
- Channel-ranked DAS (CR-DAS);
- Robust Capon beam former (RCB).
4.2. Reconstruction Quality
5. Challenges and Future Research Directions
5.1. Effective Coupling of Microwave Signal
5.2. Contrast Agents
5.3. Signal Processing and Imaging Algorithms
5.4. Antennas and Measurement System
5.5. Frequency Bandwidth and Resolution
5.6. Interference and Noise
5.7. Hybrid and Portable Systems
5.8. Millimeter Wave Imaging
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
BIM | Born Iterative Method |
CF DAS | Coherence Factor Based Delay-And-Sum |
CMI | Confocal Microwave Imaging |
CNR | Contrast-to-Noise ratio |
CR DAS | Channel Ranked Delay-And-Sum |
CS | Compressive Sensing |
CSAR | Circular Synthetic Aperture Radar |
DAS | Delay-And-Sum |
DBIM | Distorted Born Iterative Method |
DMAS | Delay-Multiply-And-Sum |
FDG | Fluorodeoxyglucose |
FDTD | Finite Difference Time Domain |
FEM | Finite Element Method |
FIR | Finite Impulse Response |
HMI | Holographic Microwave Imaging |
HMIA | Holographic Microwave Imaging Array |
IDAS | Improved Delay-And-Sum |
IC-DAS | Iteratively Corrected Delay-And-Sum |
kNN | k-Nearest Neighbor |
LSF | Line Spread Function |
MIST | Microwave Imaging via Space Time |
MITAI | Microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging |
MLP | Multilayer Perceptron |
MNP | Magnetic Nanoparticles |
MRI | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
MSA | Multistatic Adaptive |
MWI | Microwave Imaging |
MWT | Microwave Tomography |
NCT | Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
PDE | Partial Differential Equation |
PET | Positron Emission Tomography |
PSF | Point Spread Function |
RCB | Robust Capon Beamformer |
ROI | Region of Interest |
SAR | Synthetic Aperture Radar |
SCR | Signal-to-Clutter Ratio |
SMR | Signal-to-Mean Ratio |
SNR | Signal-to-Noise Ratio |
SVM | Support Vector Machine |
TDS | Time Domain Spectroscopy |
TSAR | Tissue Sensing Adaptive Radar |
US | Ultrasound |
UWB | Ultra Wideband |
WHO | World Health Organization |
References
- Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Fuchs, H.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vnencak-Jones, C.; Berger, M.; Pao, W. Types of Molecular Tumor Testing. 2016. Available online: https://www.mycancergenome.org/content/molecular-medicine/types-of-molecular-tumor-testing/ (accessed on 27 February 2022).
- Nover, A.B.; Jagtap, S.; Anjum, W.; Yegingil, H.; Shih, W.Y.; Shih, W.H.; Brooks, A.D. Modern breast cancer detection: A technological review. J. Biomed. Imaging 2009, 2009, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S.; Lee, S. Recent advances in microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2016, 2016, 5054912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heywang-Köbrunner, S.H.; Hacker, A.; Sedlacek, S. Advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening. Breast Care 2011, 6, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pastorino, M. Microwave Imaging; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 208. [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, C.; Gabriel, S.; Corthout, y.E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chandra, R.; Zhou, H.; Balasingham, I.; Narayanan, R.M. On the opportunities and challenges in microwave medical sensing and imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 1667–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidipour, A.; Henriksson, T.; Hopfer, M.; Planas, R.; Semenov, S. Electromagnetic tomography for brain imaging and stroke diagnostics: Progress towards clinical application. In Emerging Electromagnetic Technologies for Brain Diseases Diagnostics, Monitoring and Therapy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 59–86. [Google Scholar]
- Semenov, S.; Kellam, J.; Sizov, Y.; Nazarov, A.; Williams, T.; Nair, B.; Pavlovsky, A.; Posukh, V.; Quinn, M. Microwave tomography of extremities: 1. Dedicated 2D system and physiological signatures. Phys. Med. Biol. 2011, 56, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meaney, P.M.; Goodwin, D.; Golnabi, A.H.; Zhou, T.; Pallone, M.; Geimer, S.D.; Burke, G.; Paulsen, K.D. Clinical microwave tomographic imaging of the calcaneus: A first-in-human case study of two subjects. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 3304–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zamani, A.; Rezaeieh, S.A.; Bialkowski, K.S.; Abbosh, A.M. Boundary estimation of imaged object in microwave medical imaging using antenna resonant frequency shift. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 66, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzegorczyk, T.M.; Meaney, P.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Paulsen, K.D. Fast 3-D tomographic microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2012, 31, 1584–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Modiri, A.; Goudreau, S.; Rahimi, A.; Kiasaleh, K. Review of breast screening: Toward clinical realization of microwave imaging. Med. Phys. 2017, 44, e446–e458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conceição, R.C.; Mohr, J.J.; O’Halloran, M. An Introduction to Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Moloney, B.M.; O’Loughlin, D.; Abd Elwahab, S.; Kerin, M.J. Breast Cancer Detection–A Synopsis of Conventional Modalities and the Potential Role of Microwave Imaging. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Misilmani, H.M.E.; Naous, T.; Khatib, S.K.A.; Kabalan, K.Y. A Survey on Antenna Designs for Breast Cancer Detection Using Microwave Imaging. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 102570–102594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldhaeebi, M.A.; Alzoubi, K.; Almoneef, T.S.; Bamatraf, S.M.; Attia, H.; M Ramahi, O. Review of Microwaves Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection. Sensors 2020, 20, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaudhary, S. Dielectric properties of normal and malignant human breast tissues at radiowave and microwave frequencies. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 1984, 21, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
- Surowiec, A.J.; Stuchly, S.S.; Barr, J.R.; Swarup, A. Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988, 35, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, A.; Land, D. Dielectric properties of female human breast tissue measured in vitro at 3.2 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1992, 37, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joines, W.T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Jirtle, R.L. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med. Phys. 1994, 21, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.W.; Cho, J.; Lee, Y.; Yim, J.; Kang, B.; Oh, K.K.; Jung, W.H.; Kim, H.J.; Cheon, C.; Lee, H.D.; et al. Microwave detection of metastasized breast cancer cells in the lymph node; potential application for sentinel lymphadenectomy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2004, 86, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lazebnik, M.; McCartney, L.; Popovic, D.; Watkins, C.B.; Lindstrom, M.J.; Harter, J.; Sewall, S.; Magliocco, A.; Booske, J.H.; Okoniewski, M.; et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lazebnik, M.; Popovic, D.; McCartney, L.; Watkins, C.B.; Lindstrom, M.J.; Harter, J.; Sewall, S.; Ogilvie, T.; Magliocco, A.; Breslin, T.M.; et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 6093–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; Li, D.; Poplack, S.P.; Paulsen, K.D. A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2000, 48, 1841–1853. [Google Scholar]
- Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Perregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; Preda, L.; Bellomi, M. Dielectric Properties Characterization From 0.5 to 50 GHz of Breast Cancer Tissues. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Peregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; et al. Experimental validation of the dielectric permittivity of breast cancer tissues up to 50 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Pavia, Italy, 20–22 September 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Perregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; et al. Dielectric properties of breast tissues: Experimental results up to 50 GHz. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018), London, UK, 9–13 April 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fear, E.C. Microwave imaging of the breast. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 4, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fear, E.C.; Hagness, S.C.; Meaney, P.M.; Okoniewski, M.; Stuchly, M.A. Enhancing breast tumor detection with near-field imaging. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2002, 3, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, K.L.; Cevasco, P.; Dunlea, P.; Shaeffer, J. Radiometric sensing: An adjuvant to mammography to determine breast biopsy. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No. 00CH37017), Boston, MA, USA, 11–16 June 2000; Volume 2, pp. 929–932. [Google Scholar]
- Stec, B.; Dobrowolski, A.; Susek, W. Multifrequency microwave thermograph for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 51, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; di Florio-Alexander, R.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Geimer, S.D.; Zhou, T.; Paulsen, K.D. Microwave tomography in the context of complex breast cancer imaging. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010; pp. 3398–3401. [Google Scholar]
- Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; Raynolds, T.; Fox, C.J.; Fang, Q.; Kogel, C.A.; Poplack, S.P.; Paulsen, K.D. Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography. Acad. Radiol. 2007, 14, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meaney, P.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Muffly, L.S.; Click, M.; Poplack, S.P.; Wells, W.A.; Schwartz, G.N.; di Florio-Alexander, R.M.; Tosteson, T.D.; Li, Z.; et al. Microwave imaging for neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: Initial clinical experience. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, R35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, L. Early diagnosis of breast cancer. Sensors 2017, 17, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bucci, O.M.; Crocco, L.; Scapaticci, R. On the optimal measurement configuration for magnetic nanoparticles-enhanced breast cancer microwave imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guang-dong, L.; Ye-rong, Z. An Overview of Active Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection. CA J. Nanjing Univ. Posts Telecommun. 2010, 30, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
- Bidhendi, H.K.; Jafari, H.M.; Genov, R. Ultra-wideband imaging systems for breast cancer detection. In Ultra-Wideband and 60 GHz Communications for Biomedical Applications; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 83–103. [Google Scholar]
- Hagness, S.C.; Taflove, A.; Bridges, J.E. Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: Fixed-focus and antenna-array sensors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 45, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hagness, S.C.; Taflove, A.; Bridges, J.E. Three-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: Design of an antenna-array element. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1999, 47, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klemm, M.; Craddock, I.; Leendertz, J.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R. Experimental and clinical results of breast cancer detection using UWB microwave radar. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, 5–12 July 2008; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Klemm, M.; Craddock, I.J.; Leendertz, J.A.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R. Radar-based breast cancer detection using a hemispherical antenna array-Experimental results. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 1692–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henriksson, T.; Klemm, M.; Gibbins, D.; Leendertz, J.; Horseman, T.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R.; Craddock, I. Clinical trials of a multistatic UWB radar for breast imaging. In Proceedings of the 2011 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference, Loughborough, UK, 14–15 November 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Fear, E.; Sill, J. Preliminary investigations of tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast tumor detection. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37439), Cancun, Mexico, 17–21 September 2003; Volume 4, pp. 3787–3790. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, T.C.; Fear, E.C.; Westwick, D.T. Tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast cancer detection-investigations of an improved skin-sensing method. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2006, 54, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bond, E.J.; Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Van Veen, B.D. Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early detection of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2003, 51, 1690–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Van Veen, B.D.; van der Weide, D. Experimental investigation of microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for breast cancer detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 8–13 June 2003; Volume 1, pp. 379–382. [Google Scholar]
- Elsdon, M.; Leach, M.; Skobelev, S.; Smith, D. Microwave holographic imaging of breast cancer. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, Hangzhou, China, 16–17 August 2007; pp. 966–969. [Google Scholar]
- Elsdon, M.; Yurduseven, O.; Smith, D. Early stage breast cancer detection using indirect microwave holography. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2013, 143, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, D.; Yurduseven, O.; Livingstone, B. The use of indirect holographic techniques for microwave imaging. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Microwave Techniques (COMITE), Pardubice, Czech Republic, 17–18 April 2013; pp. 16–21. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Simpkin, R.; Al-Jumaily, A. Holographic microwave imaging array: Experimental investigation of breast tumour detection. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Electromagnetics, Applications and Student Innovation Competition, Hong Kong, China, 1–3 August 2013; pp. 61–64. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Fatemi, M. Compressive Sensing Holographic Microwave Random Array Imaging of Dielectric Inclusion. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 56477–56487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L. Multi-Frequency Holographic Microwave Imaging for Breast Lesion Detection. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 83984–83993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardati, F.; Iudicello, S. Modeling the visibility of breast malignancy by a microwave radiometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 55, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhurbenko, V.; Rubæk, T.; Krozer, V.; Meincke, P. Design and realisation of a microwave three-dimensional imaging system with application to breast-cancer detection. IET Microwaves Antennas Propag. 2010, 4, 2200–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Souvorov, A.E.; Bulyshev, A.E.; Semenov, S.Y.; Svenson, R.H.; Tatsis, G.P. Two-dimensional computer analysis of a microwave flat antenna array for breast cancer tomography. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2000, 48, 1413–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulyshev, A.E.; Semenov, S.Y.; Souvorov, A.E.; Svenson, R.H.; Nazarov, A.G.; Sizov, Y.E.; Tatsis, G.P. Computational modeling of three-dimensional microwave tomography of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 48, 1053–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fear, E.C.; Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Stuchly, M.A. Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Localization of tumors in three dimensions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 49, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fear, E.; Stuchly, M. Confocal microwave imaging for breast tumor detection: A study of resolution and detection ability. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–28 October 2001; Volume 3, pp. 2355–2358. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Bond, E.J.; Van Veen, B.D.; Hagness, S.C. An overview of ultra-wideband microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early-stage breast-cancer detection. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2005, 47, 19–34. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Y.; Guo, B.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Stoica, P. Multistatic adaptive microwave imaging for early breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 53, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsdon, M.; Leach, M.; Fdo, M.J.; Foti, S.; Smith, D. Early Stage Breast Cancer Detection using Indirect Microwave Holography. In Proceedings of the 2006 European Microwave Conference, Manchester, UK, 10–15 September 2006; pp. 1256–1259. [Google Scholar]
- O’Halloran, M.; Jones, E.; Glavin, M. Quasi-multistatic MIST beamforming for the early detection of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 57, 830–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCombe, J.J.; Nikolova, N.K. SNR assessment of microwave imaging systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI), Memphis, TN, USA, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 149–150. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, K.C.; Lim, Y.T.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, N.; Park, C.; Yoo, K.H.; Son, S.H.; Jeon, S.I. Microwave tomography analysis system for breast tumor detection. J. Med. Syst. 2012, 36, 1757–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, S.H.; Simonov, N.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.M.; Jeon, S.I. Preclinical prototype development of a microwave tomography system for breast cancer detection. ETRI J. 2010, 32, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar, S.M.; Al-Joumayly, M.A.; Burfeindt, M.J.; Behdad, N.; Hagness, S.C. Multiband miniaturized patch antennas for a compact, shielded microwave breast imaging array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 62, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Medina, Y.; Augusto, M.; Paz, A.V. Microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Experimental comparison of Confocal and Holography algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE ANDESCON, Arequipa, Peru, 19–21 October 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Matrone, G.; Bozzi, M.; Magenes, G.; Mazzanti, A.; Perregrini, L.; Svelto, F.; et al. On the Feasibility of Breast Cancer Imaging Systems at Millimeter-Waves Frequencies. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 1795–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammouch, N.; Ammor, H. A confocal microwave imaging implementation for breast cancer detection. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2019, 7, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, M.; Mahmud, M.; Islam, M.T.; Kibria, S.; Samsuzzaman, M. A Low Cost and Portable Microwave Imaging System for Breast Tumor Detection Using UWB Directional Antenna array. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Srinivasan, D.; Gopalakrishnan, M. Breast Cancer Detection Using Adaptable Textile Antenna Design. J. Med. Syst. 2019, 43, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, M.; Rahpeima, R.; Kashkooli, F.M. Breast cancer diagnosis with a microwave thermoacoustic imaging technique—A numerical approach. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2019, 57, 1497–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheeba, I.R.; Jayanthy, T. Design and Analysis of a Flexible Softwear Antenna for Tumor Detection in Skin and Breast Model. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2019, 107, 887–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geetharamani, G.; Aathmanesan, T. Metamaterial inspired THz antenna for breast cancer detection. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Islam, M.T.; Samsuzzaman, M.; Kibria, S.; Misran, N.; Islam, M.T. Metasurface Loaded High Gain Antenna based Microwave Imaging using Iteratively Corrected Delay Multiply and Sum Algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Felício, J.M.; Bioucas-Dias, J.M.; Costa, J.R.; Fernandes, C.A. Microwave Breast Imaging Using a Dry Setup. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2020, 6, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdollahi, N.; Jeffrey, I.; LoVetri, J. Improved Tumor Detection via Quantitative Microwave Breast Imaging Using Eigenfunction-Based Prior. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2020, 6, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oloumi, D.; Winter, R.S.C.; Kordzadeh, A.; Boulanger, P.; Rambabu, K. Microwave Imaging of Breast Tumor Using Time-Domain UWB Circular-SAR Technique. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2020, 39, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, V.; Ahmed, A.; Kanumuri, T.; Shakher, C.; Sheoran, G. Early detection of cancerous tissues in human breast utilizing near field microwave holography. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2020, 30, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.S.; Mahdi, J.F.; Kadhim, M.A. Design of Ultra-Wideband Microwave Antenna Array for Detection Breast Cancer Tumours. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 881, 012112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliopoulos, I.; Di Meo, S.; Pasian, M.; Zhadobov, M.; Pouliguen, P.; Potier, P.; Perregrini, L.; Sauleau, R.; Ettorre, M. Enhancement of Penetration of Millimeter Waves by Field Focusing Applied to Breast Cancer Detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahpeima, R.; Soltani, M.; Kashkooli, F.M. Numerical Study of Microwave Induced Thermoacoustic Imaging for Initial Detection of Cancer of Breast on Anatomically Realistic Breast Phantom. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 196, 105606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miraoui, A.; Sidi, L.M.; Meriah, M. Detection and Localization of Breast Tumor in 2D Using Microwave Imaging. In Intelligent Computing; Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 132–141. [Google Scholar]
- Coşğun, S.; Bilgin, E.; Çayören, M. Microwave imaging of breast cancer with factorization method: SPIONs as contrast agent. Med. Phys. 2020, 47, 3113–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, G.; Kaur, A. Breast tissue tumor detection using ‘S’ parameter analysis with an UWB stacked aperture coupled microstrip patch antenna having a ‘+’ shaped defected ground structure. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2020, 12, 635–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Kaur, A. Monostatic Radar Based Ultra-Wideband Microwave Imaging System Featuring a Miniature Fork Shaped Microstrip Patch Antenna with a Reduced DGS for Early Breast Tumor Detection. In Intelligent Communication, Control and Devices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 113–122. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, H.; Kikkawa, T. Optimal microwave breast imaging using quality metrics and simulated annealing algorithm. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehranpour, M.; Jarchi, S.; Ghorbani, A.; Keshtkar, A. A novel approach of high-resolution UWB microwave imaging system based on an improved 3D back-projection method for early-stage breast cancer detection applications. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2021, 13, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocquet, B.; Van de Velde, J.; Mamouni, A.; Leroy, Y.; Giaux, G.; Delannoy, J.; Delvalee, D. Microwave radiometric imaging at 3 GHz for the exploration of breast tumors. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1990, 38, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourqui, J.; Sill, J.M.; Fear, E.C. A prototype system for measuring microwave frequency reflections from the breast. J. Biomed. Imaging 2012, 2012, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Preece, A.W.; Craddock, I.; Shere, M.; Jones, L.; Winton, H.L. MARIA M4: Clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 033502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, E.; Duff, K.; Popovic, M.; Coates, M. Investigation of time-domain microwave radar with breast clinic patients. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 10–15 April 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, H.; Sasada, S.; Kadoya, T.; Okada, M.; Arihiro, K.; Xiao, X.; Kikkawa, T. Detectability of Breast Tumor by a Hand-held Impulse-Radar Detector: Performance Evaluation and Pilot Clinical Study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, F.; Sun, L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H.; Pan, D.; Wu, R.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q. A large-scale clinical trial of radar-based microwave breast imaging for Asian women: Phase I. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–14 July 2017; pp. 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuwahara, Y. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection. In Breast Imaging; Malik, A.M., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rana, S.P.; Dey, M.; Tiberi, G.; Sani, L.; Vispa, A.; Raspa, G.; Duranti, M.; Ghavami, M.; Dudley, S. Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Lesion Detection in Microwave Breast Imaging Clinical Data. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sani, L.; Ghavami, N.; Vispa, A.; Paoli, M.; Raspa, G.; Ghavami, M.; Sacchetti, F.; Vannini, E.; Ercolani, S.; Saracini, A.; et al. Novel microwave apparatus for breast lesions detection: Preliminary clinical results. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2019, 52, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, H.; Sasada, S.; Masumoto, N.; Kadoya, T.; Okada, M.; Arihiro, K.; Xiao, X.; Kikkawa, T. A Two-Stage Rotational Surface Clutter Suppression Method for Microwave Breast Imaging with Multistatic Impulse-Radar Detector. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 9586–9598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vispa, A.; Sani, L.; Paoli, M.; Bigotti, A.; Raspa, G.; Ghavami, N.; Caschera, S.; Ghavami, M.; Duranti, M.; Tiberi, G. UWB Device for Breast Microwave Imaging: Phantom and Clinical Validations. Measurement 2019, 146, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norouzzadeh, E.; Chamaani, S.; Moll, J.; Kexel, C.; Nguyen, D.H.; Hübner, F.; Bazrafshan, B.; Vogl, T.J.; Krozer, V. Numerical and experimental analysis of a transmission-based breast imaging system: A study of application to patients. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2020, 12, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noghanian, S. Microwave tomography for biomedical quantitative imaging. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2012, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mojabi, P.; LoVetri, J. Microwave biomedical imaging using the multiplicative regularized gauss–newton inversion. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2009, 8, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abubakar, A.; Van den Berg, P.M.; Mallorqui, J.J. Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2002, 50, 1761–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baran, A.; Kurrant, D.J.; Zakaria, A.; Fear, E.C.; LoVetri, J. Breast imaging using microwave tomography with radar-based tissue-regions estimation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2014, 149, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shea, J.D.; Van Veen, B.D.; Hagness, S.C. A TSVD analysis of microwave inverse scattering for breast imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elahi, M.A.; Lavoie, B.; Porter, E.; Olavini, M.; Jones, E.; Fear, E.; O’Halloran, M. Comparison of radar-based microwave imaging algorithms applied to experimental breast phantoms. In Proceedings of the 2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS), Montreal, QC, Canada, 19–26 August 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Sagheer, M.; Sami, H.; Riaz, K.; Qasim Mehmood, M.; Zubair, M. Performance Comparison of Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening. In Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Microwave, Antennas Circuits (ICMAC), Islamabad, Pakistan, 21–22 December 2021; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elahi, M.A.; O’Loughlin, D.; Lavoie, B.R.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E.; Fear, E.C.; O’Halloran, M. Evaluation of Image Reconstruction Algorithms for Confocal Microwave Imaging: Application to Patient Data. Sensors 2018, 18, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, N.B.; Webb, A. Introduction to Medical Imaging: Physics, Engineering and Clinical Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, D.C.; Fang, L.D.; Fang, W.H.; Lee, C.H. Tradeoff study of microwave imaging for biomedical application. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), Singapore, 9–11 December 2013; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Kaye, C.; Gilmore, C.; LoVetri, J. Enhanced Detection of Magnetic Nanoparticles using a Novel Microwave Ferromagnetic Resonance Imaging System. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambrosanio, M.; Franceschini, S.; Pascazio, V.; Baselice, F. Microwave Breast Imaging via Neural Networks for Almost Real-time Applications. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.12522. [Google Scholar]
- Khoshdel, V.; Asefi, M.; Ashraf, A.; LoVetri, J. Full 3D microwave breast imaging using a deep-learning technique. J. Imaging 2020, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, K.; Khoshdel, V.; Asefi, M.; LoVetri, J.; Gilmore, C.; Jeffrey, I. A Machine Learning Workflow for Tumour Detection in Breasts Using 3D Microwave Imaging. Electronics 2021, 10, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeremic, A. Detection of Breast Cancer Using Microwave Imaging and Machine Learning-finite Element Method Inverse Models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Photonics Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS), Hangzhou, China, 21–25 November 2021; pp. 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benny, R.; Anjit, T.A.; Mythili, P. An overview of microwave imaging for breast tumor detection. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 2020, 87, 61–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; Shukla, P.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.; Khalily, M.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Antenna Mutual Coupling Suppression Over Wideband Using Embedded Periphery Slot for Antenna Arrays. Electronics 2018, 7, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilmore, C.; Mojabi, P.; Zakaria, A.; Ostadrahimi, M.; Kaye, C.; Noghanian, S.; Shafai, L.; Pistorius, S.; LoVetri, J. A wideband microwave tomography system with a novel frequency selection procedure. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanadaa, E.; Kudoub, T. Electromagnetic noise in the clinical environment. Polar 2009, 500, 97-4. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi, N.; Kurrant, D.; Mojabi, P.; Omer, M.; Fear, E.; LoVetri, J. Incorporation of Ultrasonic Prior Information for Improving Quantitative Microwave Imaging of Breast. IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphys. Comput. Tech. 2019, 4, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojabi, P.; Khoshdel, V.; Lovetri, J. Tissue-Type Classification With Uncertainty Quantification of Microwave and Ultrasound Breast Imaging: A Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 182092–182104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adachi, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Fujioka, T.; Mori, M.; Kubota, K.; Oda, G.; Kikkawa, T. Feasibility of Portable Microwave Imaging Device for Breast Cancer Detection. Diagnostics 2021, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Jesus Aragão, A.; Sanches, B.; de Carvalho, D.; Van Noije, W.A. Low-cost portable system prototype for breast cancer detection using UWB signals. In Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Chengdu, China, 17–19 October 2020; pp. 715–720. [Google Scholar]
- Saied, I.; Arslan, T.; Ullah, R.; Liu, C.; Wang, F. Hardware Accelerator for Wearable and Portable Radar-based Microwave Breast Imaging Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Daegu, Korea, 22–28 May 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Sasada, S.; Masumoto, N.; Song, H.; Kajitani, K.; Emi, A.; Kadoya, T.; Arihiro, K.; Kikkawa, T.; Okada, M. Portable impulse-radar detector for breast cancer: A pilot study. J. Med. Imaging 2018, 5, 025502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, D. Simulation of a portable microwave breast cancer detection system and derivation of a mathematical model for the relative electromagnetic fields. Master Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Meo, S.D.; Bonello, J.; Lodi, M.B.; Farhat, I.; Farrugia, L.; Fanti, A.; Pasian, M.; Desogus, F.; Sammut, C.V. On the dielectric/thermal characterization and calibration of solutions and materials for biomedical applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–20 March 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tissue Type | Relative Permittivity | Conductivity (mS/cm) | Water Content (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Fatty tissue | 2.8–7.6 | 0.5–2.9 | 11–31 |
Normal tissue | 9.8–46 | 3.7–34 | 41–76 |
Benign tissue | 15–67 | 7–49 | 62–84 |
Malignant tissue | 9–59 | 2–34 | 66–79 |
Study (Year) | Measurement Technique (Temperature °C) | Number of Samples | Frequency Range | Tissue Type | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chaudhary et al. [22] (1984) | RX-meter and TDS probe: Samples collected in physiological saline and are in inserted into RX-meter chamber or pressed against using TDS probe (25 °C). | 15 | 3 MHz–3 GHz | healthy and malignant tissues. | - Malignant tissue displayed 3–5 times increase in electrical properties compared to healthy tissue. - The greatest permittivity difference occurred at frequencies less than 100 MHz. |
Surowiec et al. [23] (1988) | Open-ended coaxial capacitive sensor: Samples inserted into a holder (37 °C). | 7 | 20 kHz–100 MHz | healthy and malignant tissues. | - Central region of tumor and surrounding tissue yielded higher dielectric values than peripheral tissue. |
Campbell and Land [24] (1992) | Resonant cavity perturbation method: Samples inserted into holder (unspecified). | 37 | 3.2 GHz | healthy, malignant, and benign tissues. | - Cancerous tissue showed higher dielectric properties. - Difference in dielectric properties between benign and malignant tumors not sufficient to differentiate between them. |
Joines et al. [25] (1994) | Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe (24 °C). | 12 | 50–900 MHz | healthy and malignant tissues. | - An average difference in permittivity and conductivity of 233% and 577%, respectively, was observed between healthy and cancerous tissues. |
Meaney et al. [29] (2000) | Radiating monopole antenna array submerged in saline bath surrounding the breast (25 °C). | 5 | 900 MHz | healthy tissue. | - Average permittivity values at 900 MHz were significantly higher than those reported by Joines et al. [25]. - A correlation was established between fat content and the average permittivity values. |
Choi et al. [26] (2004) | Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe (unspecified). | 12 | 0.5–30 GHz | healthy and malignant tissues extracted from lymph nodes. | - Significant contract in dielectric properties between healthy and malignant lymph nodes’ tissues. |
Lazebnik et al. [27,28] (2007) | Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe. (18–25.70 °C in University of Wisconsin) (19.5–26.60 °C in University of Calgary). | 354, from 93 patients [27] and 196 patients [28] | 0.5–20 GHz | healthy and malignant tissues extracted from adipose, fibro connective and glandular regions of the breast. | - Dielectric properties of breast tissues are primarily determined by the adipose content. - The location from which the healthy tissue sample is taken affects the comparison. - Significant contrast, 10:1, in dielectric properties between healthy and malignant tissues. |
Martellosio et al. [30] (2017) | Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (25 °C). | 220 | 0.5–50 GHz | healthy and malignant tissue | - Dielectric properties of normal tissues showed wider variability than the tumorous tissues. - Performance comparable to that of mammography performed in vivo on patients. - Tumorous tissues had higher real and imaginary parts of the complex permittivity than normal breast tissues. |
Meo et al. [31] (2017) | Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (25 °C). | 124 | 0.5–50 GHz | healthy and malignant tissue | - The results for sensitivity were 90% both for real and imaginary part, while those for specificity were 75%. |
Meo et al. [32] (2018) | Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (−40–220 °C). | 346 | 0.5–50 GHz | healthy and malignant tissue | - Higher variability in dielectric properties of healthy tissues compared to malignant ones. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
AlSawaftah, N.; El-Abed, S.; Dhou, S.; Zakaria, A. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Imaging 2022, 8, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123
AlSawaftah N, El-Abed S, Dhou S, Zakaria A. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging. 2022; 8(5):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlSawaftah, Nour, Salma El-Abed, Salam Dhou, and Amer Zakaria. 2022. "Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions" Journal of Imaging 8, no. 5: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123
APA StyleAlSawaftah, N., El-Abed, S., Dhou, S., & Zakaria, A. (2022). Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging, 8(5), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123