Next Article in Journal
Extraction and Calculation of Roadway Area from Satellite Images Using Improved Deep Learning Model and Post-Processing
Next Article in Special Issue
Digital Watermarking as an Adversarial Attack on Medical Image Analysis with Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Surreptitious Adversarial Examples through Functioning QR Code
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions

1
Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Imaging 2022, 8(5), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 23 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Strategies for Medical Image Analysis)

Abstract

:
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type and is the leading cause of cancer-related death among females worldwide. Breast screening and early detection are currently the most successful approaches for the management and treatment of this disease. Several imaging modalities are currently utilized for detecting breast cancer, of which microwave imaging (MWI) is gaining quite a lot of attention as a promising diagnostic tool for early breast cancer detection. MWI is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, fast, convenient, and safe screening tool. The purpose of this paper is to provide an up-to-date survey of the principles, developments, and current research status of MWI for breast cancer detection. This paper is structured into two sections; the first is an overview of current MWI techniques used for detecting breast cancer, followed by an explanation of the working principle behind MWI and its various types, namely, microwave tomography and radar-based imaging. In the second section, a review of the initial experiments along with more recent studies on the use of MWI for breast cancer detection is presented. Furthermore, the paper summarizes the challenges facing MWI as a breast cancer detection tool and provides future research directions. On the whole, MWI has proven its potential as a screening tool for breast cancer detection, both as a standalone or complementary technique. However, there are a few challenges that need to be addressed to unlock the full potential of this imaging modality and translate it to clinical settings.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a complex disease whose rate of incidence and mortality are rapidly growing worldwide. According to the American cancer society (ACS), around 1.9 million new cases and 600,000 deaths are expected to occur in the United States alone, making cancer the second ranking cause of death globally [1]. For both genders, statistics showed that lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type (11.4% of the total cases) and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths (18.4% of total deaths). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths (11.7% of total cancer cases), followed by colorectal and lung cancers. Regardless of the cancer type, early detection is considered crucial in the cancer treatment process as many types of cancer have a high chance of being cured if detected early and treated adequately. For instance, if breast cancer is detected early, the five-year survival rate can become as high as 90% [2]. In this work, we focus on the early detection of breast cancer that has the potential to enhance survival rates, improve the quality of life, and reduce the complications and costs associated with cancer treatment.
Cancer is defined as the rapid growth and proliferation of abnormal cells; these cells undergo changes that disturb the systematic life course of the cell. Such changes arise mainly due to alterations in the genetic programs controlling cell proliferation, relations with neighboring cells, and detection by the immune system. There are various tests that can be performed to detect cell mutations. The simplest of tests can detect only one type of mutation in one gene, whereas more complex tests can simultaneously detect all the types of gene alterations (e.g., substitutions, duplications, insertions, deletions, gene copy number variations, and structural variants, including inversions and translocations). Examples of these tests include allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Sanger dideoxy sequencing, pyrosequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), mass spectrometry (MS), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [3].
Currently, there are several established techniques for breast cancer screening and detection. The most common techniques include clinical breast examination, X-ray mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). X-ray mammography is commonly used for early breast cancer diagnosis; however, this modality has several shortcomings. It requires breast compression which can cause the patient pain or discomfort. It is also difficult to distinguish tumors in dense breast mammograms, because both dense breast tissue and tumors appear white in mammogram images. X-ray mammography can also lead to unnecessary, and often invasive, follow-up tests (e.g., biopsies) associated with false positive test results. With regard to radiation exposure, mammography is associated with a small amount of radiation, but the radiation risk is considered irrelevant compared to the advantage of early detection. Breast ultrasonography or sonomammography is a painless technique; however, ultrasound (US) images tend to have low resolution and do not enable one to distinguish between benign and malignant tumors. In addition, sonomammography is mostly used as a secondary technique, usually after a mammography result shows a suspected mass. MRI is typically used for further evaluation of questionable findings. Moreover, MRI is considered the best technique for post-chemotherapy imaging and has the added advantage of being sensitive to imaging silicone breast implants. MRI has better resolution and less operator dependence than US. In addition, it does not use radiation, making it safer than modalities that do, thus allowing use with pregnant patients. On the other hand, MRI is rather costly, making it economically unsuitable as an early screening and detection method. The main advantage of PET is that it can diagnose cancer in the very early stages and scan the entire body for recurrence. However, it tends to have low resolution [4,5,6]. The majority of existing imaging modalities depend on the interactions of electromagnetic waves or acoustic waves with body tissues and fluids. With respect to electromagnetic waves, the majority of the spectrum has already been explored, from the high-frequency end (as in X-rays and PET) to low-megahertz bands (where MRI operates). The portion of the spectrum that is least investigated and has been generating a lot of interest for medical imaging in the past twenty years is the microwave frequency band, which occurs between 300 MHz and 300 GHz [7]. At microwave frequencies, the interaction of electromagnetic signals with matter depends on the material’s dielectric properties, which are the electric permittivity and conductivity. For body tissues, the dielectric properties are related directly to the water content of different biological constituents [8,9,10]. Low-water-content tissues include fat and bones, whereas high water content tissues include muscles, brain, blood, internal organs, and tumors.
Utilizing variations in tissues’ electrical properties, microwave imaging (MWI) has emerged as a technique to produce dielectric maps for various parts of the body. A typical MWI system consists of an antenna array, a microwave signal transmitter and receiver, and a radio-frequency switch to alternate between the different elements of the array [11]. The array surrounds a human organ, which is immersed in a matching medium. During measurements, each element in the array transmits an electromagnetic signal, with the other antennas receiving the reflected waves. The collected measurements are input into an optimization algorithm to produce an image of the dielectric properties of the organ. Some of the biomedical applications of MWI being investigated include brain stroke detection [12], extremities imaging [13,14], and lung cancer detection [15].
This paper focuses on the application of MWI in breast cancer detection. In comparison to normal cells, the water content in tumors is high. This can be attributed to the nature of tumor cells that causes them to retain more fluid than normal cells. This extra fluid, which is in the form of bound water, changes the dielectric properties of breast tissues. In MWI, tumors are detected using scattered or reflected waves, which arise from the differences in dielectric properties between normal and malignant breast tissues [5,16,17,18].
The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive up-to-date survey of the developments and current status of MWI as an early breast cancer screening tool along with an overview of the state of the art and future directions. Other recent surveys have been published in the literature. Moloney et al. [19] provided a survey on several imaging modalities used for breast cancer detection, including the potential role of MWI. Misilmani et al. [20] provided a survey focusing specifically on the antenna designs of the MWI systems used for breast cancer detection. Aldhaeebi et al. [21] presented a comprehensive survey of MWI systems used for breast cancer detection focusing on two types of MWI, namely, microwave tomography (MWT) and radar-based techniques. Compared to other surveys, our paper focuses on highlighting the specifications and findings for initial experiments and recent advances in measuring the dielectric properties of breast tissues as well as previous and ongoing developments of MWI systems. In addition, this paper discusses research trends and provides plots demonstrating the number of citations for research publications related to the use of MWI in breast cancer screening among different disciplines. In addition, the paper discusses challenges facing MWI as a breast cancer detection tool and provides an overview of the state of the art and future research directions such as the development of the hybrid and portable MWI systems and using machine learning and deep learning techniques in breast cancer detection.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, a literature review about the research conducted investigating the dielectric properties of breast tissues and tumors is summarized. Next, in Section 3, current MWI systems for breast cancer detection are categorized and presented. Image reconstruction and MW image quality are discussed in Section 4. The challenges facing MWI as a breast cancer detection tool along with future research directions are outlined in Section 5.

2. Dielectric Properties of Breast Tissues

As discussed earlier, the objective of an MWI breast cancer detection system is to use dielectric properties to distinguish healthy breast tissues from cancerous ones. Therefore, understanding the variations of these properties with respect to tissue type and frequency is essential to enable researchers to (i) distinguish between the different types of breast tissues in MWI, and (ii) build experimental phantoms and/or simulation models for testing MWI systems. For this reason, measuring the dielectric properties of normal and cancerous breast tissues have long been the subject of various studies. These measurements are performed mainly ex vivo by extracting a sample of the breast tissue and measuring its dielectric properties using an electrical probe. In this section, a description of the most important studies is presented and summarized in chronological order.
One of the earliest studies to investigate the contrast in dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissue in the microwave frequency range was conducted in 1984 by Chaudhary et al. [22]. In this study, the dielectric properties of ex vivo normal and malignant breast tissue were measured at frequencies between 3 MHz and 3 GHz using an RX-meter and a time domain spectrography (TDS) probe. The average of the measurements showed a three to five times increase in the electrical properties of malignant tissues in comparison to those of normal tissues.
In 1988, Surowiec et al. [23] conducted a study to investigate the differences in the dielectric properties of breast cancer tissue. Dielectric measurements were obtained for tissue samples from the central part of the tumor, and surrounding tissue (both immediate and at a distance of 2 cm from the center). The properties were measured using coaxial capacitive sensors at frequencies ranging between 20 kHz to 100 MHz. The samples taken from, and closer to, the center showed increasing values for the dielectric properties.
In 1992, Campbell and Land [24] measured the complex permittivity of female breast tissues at 3.2 GHz using the resonant cavity perturbation method. The authors of this study inspected four tissue types: fatty, normal, benign, and malignant breast tissues. Similar to [22,23], Campbell and Land noted a significant disparity in dielectric values between normal and cancerous tissues; however, their findings showed similarities in the dielectric properties of benign and malignant tumor tissues, hence, they suggested that it might not be possible to distinguish between the two types of tumors based on dielectric properties alone.
In 1994, Joines et al. [25] measured the permittivity and conductivity of healthy and malignant breast tissues at frequencies ranging from 50 to 900 MHz, and their findings were consistent with the aforementioned studies. Furthermore, across the range in which the tissues were examined, the authors observed an average difference in permittivity and conductivity of 233% and 577%, respectively, between healthy and malignant tissues. For these measurements, the authors utilized an open-ended coaxial probe.
These early studies had some limitations in estimating the differences between the dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissues, mainly because the sample size was small, only a small range of frequencies was used, there were uncertainties in measurement methods, the differences in dielectric properties between normal, benign, and malignant breast tissues were not studied in detail, and there was inaccurate estimation of the in vivo contrast [21].
Another relevant study was conducted in 2004 by Choi et al. [26]. The authors of this study measured the dielectric properties of normal and metastasized lymph nodes in the breast region. Similar to the study conducted by Joines [25], measurements were performed using an open-ended coaxial probe. Again, their findings conformed with the previous studies and a significant difference in dielectric properties’ values was found between healthy and cancerous tissue.
In 2007, Lazebnik et al. carried out what is arguably the most comprehensive investigation into the dielectric properties of breast tissues [27,28]. This work was a collaboration between the University of Wisconsin—Madison in the United States and the University of Calgary in Canada. What makes this study different from previous examinations of the dielectric properties of breast cancer tissue is that the samples were categorized histologically (i.e., the adipose, glandular, and fibrous connective tissue of each sample was quantified); in addition, Lazebnik and colleagues measured the dielectric properties of three types of breast tissue, namely, normal, benign, and malignant [27,28]. The first study [27] involved 93 patients, while the second study [28] contained samples from 196 patients. The collected samples were then divided into three groups, depending on the percentage of adipose tissue within the sample [5,18]:
  • Group 1 contained samples with 0–30% adipose tissue (99 samples);
  • Group 2 contained samples with 31–84% adipose tissue (84 samples);
  • Group 3 contained samples with 85–100% adipose tissue (171 samples).
The findings of Lazebnik et al. conformed with those of Campbell and Land [24], i.e., there is significant heterogeneity in the dielectric properties of breast tissue (refer to Table 1). This was attributed to the composition of the tissue samples, as most breast tissue samples in previous studies were taken from surrounding glandular tissue which has a higher adipose content than tumor glandular tissue. Therefore, the dielectric heterogeneity of breast tissue was underestimated in previous studies.Accordingly, Lazebnik et al. concluded that the dielectric properties of breast tissue depend on the location from which the sample was taken and adipose content. In Lazebnik et al.’s [28] second study, a larger sample size and a wider frequency band (0.5–20 GHz) compared to previous studies were investigated to improve accuracy and ensure that the findings were more reflective of the population. The measured dielectric values for malignant tissue agreed well with previous studies by Chaudhary [22], Surowiec [23], and Joines [25]. Without adjusting for adipose or fibrous connective tissue, Lazebnik et al. observed a 10:1 contrast between normal high adipose tissue and malignant tissues [5,18,27,28]. In addition to the ex vivo studies, Meaney et al. estimated the dielectric properties of cancer-free breast tissue in vivo using a tomographic microwave imaging system in 2000. The results of this study showed that the average permittivity values at 900 MHz were significantly higher than those reported by Joines et al. [25]. A detailed chronological summary of the studies discussing dielectric properties of breast tissues is provided in Table 2.

3. Microwave Breast Imaging

As discussed in Section 2, the use of microwave imaging to detect breast cancer is achievable due to the difference in the electric properties between healthy and cancerous tissues. Although the penetration depth in living tissues is considered limited in the microwave frequency range, in MWI, the electromagnetic signals need to propagate only for a few centimeters in breast tissues to provide the information needed for diagnosis [17,33].
The use of microwave imaging offers the following several advantages over other imaging modalities [34]:
  • The use of low-power, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, which does not pose a health risk for patients.
  • Hardware utilized is relatively inexpensive.
  • The system can be used to detect breast cancer in men.
  • The measured signals are sensitive to all tumors and offer a specific contrast for malignancy.
  • Using MWI, breast cancer can be detected at an early stage.
  • The measurement procedure involves minimal discomfort for patients.
Due to the aforementioned advantages, the use of MWI has been gathering quite a great deal of attention over the past years, leading to a significant amount of research in the field. Figure 1 shows plots highlighting the number of citations for publications related to the use of MWI in breast cancer screening applications. These statistics were retrieved from the Web of Science databases. As can be noticed in Figure 1a, there has been an increasing interest in this topic in recent years. Furthermore, Figure 1b shows a distribution of the disciplines in which MWI is most mentioned, with the field of electrical engineering holding the greatest number of cited publications. Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the most significant research conducted in the development of microwave systems for breast cancer detection. Table 3 includes simulation and phantom studies, while Table 4 includes a summary of clinical trials.
MWI for breast cancer detection can be classified into two groups: passive and active. The main difference between both approaches is as follows; in passive systems, the natural electromagnetic (EM) radiation emitted by living tissues is measured. On the other hand, in active systems, an electromagnetic signal is transmitted from a source into the tissues, and the reflected signals are measured. These two approaches are depicted in Figure 2a,b. In the following subsections, details regarding these MWI systems are explained and discussed.

3.1. Passive Microwave Imaging

Passive MWI relies on the difference in temperature between healthy and cancerous tissues, as tumors tend to have higher temperatures due to increased vascularization [33]. Microwave radiography, also known as thermometry or thermography, incorporates radiometers to measure temperature differences in the breast. Radiometry for breast imaging has been investigated for many years and tested clinically. A good example of such systems is ONCOSCAN, which was used by Carr et al. [35] in accompaniment with mammography to test the thermal activities of breast tissues. The detection of temperature differences using ONCOSCAN was utilized as a substitute for breast biopsies for diagnosis.The readings obtained from the 130 subjects that were scanned indicated that the system had high predictive power when coupled with mammography. In 2004, Stec et al. [36] developed a system to measure and model deep-seated temperature distributions in biological tissues by means of multi-frequency microwave thermography. The mapping of temperature variations as a function of depth obtained from this model was consistent with the findings of known physical models.

3.2. Active Microwave Imaging

Active approaches of MWI involve radiating the breast with electromagnetic signals at microwave frequencies, detecting the energy reflected or scattered due to the breast, then processing the collected data to form images. For breast cancer detection, active MWI can be divided into two types: tomography and radar-based imaging [5].

3.2.1. Microwave Tomography

Microwave tomography (MWT) can be best defined as a method that produces two-dimensional (2D) slices (tomo) or images of the dielectric properties of an object of interest (OI) by measuring the electromagnetic field perturbations around this OI. MWT systems typically consist of an imaging chamber in which an array of antennas is placed surrounding the OI. The imaging chamber is filled typically with a matching medium to couple most of the microwave electromagnetic energy with the breast, which improves the system’s performance. During measurements, each antenna transmits a continuous wave (CW) single- or multi-frequency electromagnetic signal. Due to the differences between the dielectric properties of the OI and the matching medium along with property variations inside the OI, the electromagnetic fields are scattered and measured by the other non-transmitting antennas. The measurements are used as input for specialized algorithms to create the 2D images of the dielectric properties.
The use of MWT dates back to the 1970s with some of the earliest reports of biomedical applications being in the early 1980s [18]. Several research groups investigated MWT for breast cancer detection. Figure 3 shows plots that highlight the number of citations for publications related to MWT in breast cancer screening applications. These statistics were obtained from the Web of Science databases. As can be concluded, for the past three decades there have been many publications in this field, with many of them in journals related to the discipline of electrical engineering.
The first clinically tested MWI system was reported by Meaney’s group at Dartmouth College (the setup used is shown in Figure 4) [29,37,38,39]. The group conducted several variations of the study, each time improving upon the previous iteration. The prototype MWI system consisted of a 16-element transceiver monopole antenna array operating at frequencies between 300–1000 MHz. The participants’ breasts were imaged with the subject in a prone position on the examination table with the breast pendant in a saline solution. Each imaging session lasted about 15 min per breast and included full tomographic data acquisition from seven different array positions (beginning at the chest wall and moving anteriorly toward the nipple) at seven different frequencies per array position. The preliminary findings of this study revealed that a relationship existed between breast permittivity and radiological breast density.
In another iteration of their experiment, Meaney et al. [37,38,39] used their MWT system but changed the matching medium from a saline solution to a glycerin/water mixture in an attempt to optimize the coupling liquid, as this mixture was found to be better matched to the electrical impedance of the breast. This change helped in reducing coupling noise between the array elements, and thus providing more accurate images than the group’s earlier study. In the first part of the new experiment, the study involved imaging a set of cylindrical phantoms with two tumor-like inclusions (1 cm and 2 cm in diameter, respectively) positioned in the imaging array. The phantom studies were intended to test the accuracy with which the developed system could estimate the distribution of dielectric properties. The second part of the study involved evaluating the clinical feasibility of the developed system and assessing the microwave properties of the normal breast in vivo in 43 female subjects.The overall results of this study were promising, particularly the clinical trials, as the system was able to detect tumors as small as 1 cm in diameter, confirming the potential of MWI in early detection of breast cancer [37,40]. More recently, Meaney et al. [16,38,39] applied their MWI imaging system to monitor the treatment progress of women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for locally advanced breast cancer. Eight patients were imaged throughout the course of their treatment. Microwave property values were extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) followed by statistical analyses to assess short-term (30 days) and longer term (four to six months) dielectric property changes. The results demonstrated changes in microwave properties that agreed well with the overall NCT treatment response.
Another development in breast cancer MWT involves using magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) as contrast agents to improve imaging accuracy and specificity [40]. Bucci et al. [41] addressed the problem of optimizing the design of such an MWI system. The authors used their developed system to image two breast phantoms with tumor-like inclusions obtained from the repository of the University of Wisconsin [27,28]. Their analysis reported that by using 50 antennas on each of the eight measurement circles surrounding the breast, it was possible to measure the differential fields arising from the MNPs at the tumor location inside the breast. Thus, an MNPs-enhanced MWI system would be able to detect cancerous tumors.

3.2.2. Radar-Based Microwave Imaging

In contrast to MWT, which measures signals due to the changes in the whole matter of the OI, radar-based MWI constructs an image using only reflected signals due to sudden variations in the electrical properties in the OI [5]. In breast cancer detection, radar-based MWI uses the reflected waves that arise due to the differences in the dielectric properties between normal and malignant breast tissues to identify the presence and location of tumors [42]. Radar-based approaches use ultra-wideband (UWB) signals to satisfy the resolution requirement while maintaining adequate signal penetration as tissue conductivity increases with frequency [33]. It has been found that the frequency range between 1 and 10 GHz is the optimum band for this application [43]. In a UWB radar configuration, transmitting antennas radiate short-duration bursts of microwave energy into an OI. If a dielectric discontinuity is encountered by the traveling wave, it is reflected. The scattered signals are recorded by the receiving antennas and are used to estimate the existence, location, and characteristics of the structure that is causing the dielectric discontinuity [42].
In comparison to MWT systems, UWB imaging systems have several advantages, including [33,43]:
  • Computationally less expensive: MWT has computational challenges as it involves solving an inverse scattering problem to reconstruct an image for the complete profile of the breast’s dielectric properties. However, radar-based MWI does not have such computational challenges because the objective is to simply detect the presence and the location of the backscattered energy source, such as tumors, which occurs due to the difference in dielectric properties between normal and cancerous tissues.
  • Higher resolution: Using radar-based imaging systems, a precision of less than 5 mm is expected which is good enough for early detection and localization of breast cancer. This is due to the use of UWB signals. In MWT systems, CW single- or multi-frequency signals are utilized, which limits the resolution.
  • Better specificity: Radar-based MWI is able to detect if the lesion is malignant or benign. The scattered waves from benign tumors are not as strong as the ones recorded from malignant tissues. The reason behind this is that the dielectric properties of benign tumors are similar to normal tissues, but different than those of malignant tumors.
In Figure 5, two plots are produced that show the number of citations for publications related to radar-based MWI. Similar to the previous plots, these statistics were collected from the Web of Science databases.
Developed radar-based MWI systems can be classified into five groups [40]:
  • Confocal microwave imaging (CMI): This system was first introduced in 1998 by Hagness et al. [44]. It relies on pulsed confocal techniques and time-gating to enhance the detection of tumors while suppressing tissue heterogeneity and absorption effects. CMI involves using an array of antennas to focus a UWB signal at a potential tumor site, then using the same antennas to collect the scattered microwave energy from the tumor by refocusing it at the point of transmission origin [44]. The work of Hagness et al. [44] involved a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solver to simulate the dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissues (using published dielectric properties values). The FDTD simulations showed that tumors as small as 2 mm in diameter could be detected [44]. In 1999, Hagness and Taflove [45] improved the previous design by using a resistivity bowtie antenna, and performing 3D-FDTD simulations [33]. Further numerical and experimental research in using the CMI system was carried out by Hagness’s group at the University of Wisconsin—Madison.
  • Multi-static adaptive (MSA) system: Another series of high-impact radar-based MWI studies were performed by a research group in the University of Bristol [46,47,48]. The developed system used a real aperture array of UWB antennas (the developed system is shown in Figure 6). In 2009, the Bristol University group presented a UWB MWI system for the detection of breast cancer that consisted of 16 UWB aperture-coupled stacked-patch antennas located on a section of a hemisphere. The antennas were arranged this way to improve their conformation to the curve of the breast. The system was tested using realistic 3D breast phantoms and was successful in detecting tumors of 4 to 6 mm in diameter [47]. In 2010, the group conducted a large initial trial of its 31-element prototype radar system at the Breast Care Center in Bristol, UK. Although this system yielded excellent results, the outcomes of the clinical trial were mixed. Some successful detections were made as judged by an independent clinician but the repeatability of these results was lacking. The irreproducibility of the results was attributed to slight patient movements during the 90-second scans together with some uncertainties introduced by variations in blood flow and temperature. To overcome these inadequacies, the group developed a 60-antenna array system, where the increased antenna density was meant to improve the system’s immunity to clutter and shorten acquisition time to 10 seconds. This system underwent extensive clinical trials at the Breast Care Center at Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK. The rapid data acquisition improved the accuracy of the obtained images while also providing a clinical experience that is more convenient and acceptable to patients.
  • Tissue-sensing adaptive radar (TSAR): This system was developed and tested by Fear’s group at the University of Calgary et al. [49,50]. TSAR requires two scans of each breast. The breast is suspended through a hole in the examination table into a tank that contains the antenna and is filled with a coupling fluid. The first scan determines the overall location of the breast volume relative to the tank, utilizing the first reflection received at the antenna. The second scan is performed in a coronal fashion progressing from nipple to chest wall providing the data for the tumor detection algorithm [50]. Clinical results showed that TSAR has an ability to detect and localize tumors with sizes greater than 4 mm in diameter. However, this system faced some challenges such as the large reflections caused by the skin, the development of appropriate antennas, and the requirement to develop high-speed electronics for real-time imaging. Current work on TSAR includes development of appropriate sensors, exploration of practical implementation issues, improvement of imaging algorithms, and testing on breast models [40,42].
  • Microwave imaging via space–time (MIST) beamforming: This methods involves the sequential transmission of UWB signals from antenna placed near the breast surface. The received backscattered signals are spatially focused using a space–time beamformer. Due to the significant contrast in the dielectric properties of the normal and malignant tissue, localized regions of large backscattered energy levels appear in the reconstructed images, which correspond to malignant tumors [51]. The first MIST system was introduced by Hagness et al. at the University of Wisconsin—Madison [52]. This system yielded promising results in the detection and localization of very small synthetic tumors embedded in breast phantoms. In addition, Bond et al. [51] developed an MIST system for the detection of millimeter-sized tumors in the breast tissue. This system was made of a planar array of 16 horn antennas that transmitted UWB microwave signals consecutively; this design improvement enhanced the robustness against measurement variations, which resulted in clearer imaging of tumors. Further improvements to the system enabled the system to localize, identify, and resolve multiple tumors [42,51].
  • Holographic microwave imaging (HMI): In this approach, microwave imaging is performed on two stages: recording of a sampled intensity pattern followed by image reconstruction [53]. The recording of a sampled intensity pattern is performed by combining the signal scattered by the object, such as a tumor, and a reference signal. At microwave frequencies, the reference signal is electronically synthesized [54]. Smith et al. [53,54,55] proposed several HMI systems. Compared to other radar-based MWI techniques, HMI has the ability to produce real-time images at significantly lower cost because it does not require expensive ultra-high-speed electronics. Experimental results using breast phantoms consisting of skin, fat, and embedded tumor-like inclusions revealed the potential of this approach. However, further validation is still required before this technique can be translated to clinical settings. Wang et al. [56,57] provided significant contributions to the investigations into HMI systems. They proposed a 2D holographic MWI array (HMIA) system for early breast tumor detection. The first system they proposed was designed for operations at a single frequency (12.6 GHz) and included one transmitter and an array of 15 receivers placed under the breast phantom. The breast phantom used for testing consisted of homogeneous normal breast tissue, a small embedded malignant tumor, and the skin. The advantage of this system is that it does not require a matching solution medium; thus, air was used between the antennas and breast phantom. The experimental results showed that small tumors with diameter less than 5 mm at different locations could be successfully detected by using the proposed 2D HMIA technique [56]. Their second experiment aimed at investigating the feasibility and effectiveness of combining compressive sensing (CS) with holographic MWI (CS-HMIA). Their findings revealed that CS-HMIA is capable of detecting randomly distributed inclusions, of various shapes and sizes, using smaller number of sensors and shorter scan times [57]. In a more recent study, Wang [58] developed a multi-frequency HMI system and investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for breast imaging. The effectiveness and accuracy of the multi-frequency system was tested and compared to a single-frequency HMI system. The comparative study showed that the multi-frequency HMI could identify and reconstruct small tumors accurately, even when embedded in dense tissue. All of these findings showed that the multi-frequency HMI system has potential as a microwave diagnostic technique.
Table 3. Summary of relevant phantom and simulation microwave imaging studies for breast cancer detection.
Table 3. Summary of relevant phantom and simulation microwave imaging studies for breast cancer detection.
Author (Year, Location)MWI MethodStudy Type & DimensionsFrequency RangeMeasurement SystemFindings
Dobrowolski et al. [36] (2004 Military University of TechnologyPassive, radiometryNumerical simulation and phantom study: normal tissues (beef meat) 2D1.5–4.4 GHzThree-band radiometer with mini hypodermic probes with platinum RTD elements. The modeling was performed by numerically solving the thermal radiation transmission equation as a function of brightness.- As the brightness temperatures fluctuate randomly due to the nature of thermal radiation, the deep-seated profile of temperature distribution estimated from them also fluctuated randomly.
- The numerical error was determined using a Monte Carlo technique and the obtained results indicate a possibility of noninvasive detecting and measuring of spatial temperature distribution inside a human body by means of multi-frequency microwave thermograph.
Bardati and Iudicello [59] (2007, University of Rome Tor Vergata)Passive, radiometryNumerical simulation 3D-Simulation performed using standard Penne equation and steady state bio-heat equation.- Radiometer output (difference signal or over temperature) was shown to be a function of tumor depth and size.
- Radiometric visibility was found to decrease with tumor depth.
- A 10 mm lesion is radiometrically visible if it is no deeper than 2 cm.
Zhurbenko et al. [60] (2010, Technical University of Denmark)Passive, radiometryPhantom study 3D300 MHz–3 GHzThirty-two monopole-type antenna array system.- The dielectric properties for water filled spheres were estimated and presented in 3D colormaps.
- A reasonable estimation for the locations and shapes of objects-of-interest was obtained.
Hagness et al. [44] (1998, University of Wisconsin)Active, CMINumerical simulation 2D-Monopole antenna and published dielectric properties values were used in 2D FDTD computational electromagnetics analysis.- In the simulation study, malignant tumors as small as 2 mm in diameter can be detected in the presence of the background clutter generated by tissue heterogeneity.
Hagness and Taflove [45] (1999, University of Wisconsin)Active, CMINumerical simulation 3D-Wide-band bowtie antenna and published dielectric properties values were used in 3D FDTD analysis.- Simulations proved that the system was found capable to detect early-stage malignant breast tumors.
- Malignant tumors are typically asymmetrical while most benign masses are well-circumscribed and compact.
- The 3D FDTD simulations indicated the possibility of distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors based on the characteristics of their microwave backscatter response.
Bulyshev et al. [61,62] (2000–2001, Carolinas Medical Center)Active, MWTNumerical simulation 2D, 3D2 GHz, 3.5 GHz, and 5 GHzThe Helmholtz equation was used for solving direct problems and the gradient method was used for inverse problem solving.- Imaged regions close to the array structures, including the malignant zone and skin, were clearly visible.
- Tumors of size ≥ 1 cm were clearly detected.
- Structures located deeper than 3–4 cm beneath the surface neither appeared on the image nor affected the imaging of the upper layers.
- The optimal mesh should be twice as wide as the array.
- A smaller mesh tended to distort images.
- 3D images of breast can be obtained on the tomographical system in low GHz region with quality sufficient for the small size tumor detection.
Stuchly et al. [63,64] (2001–2002, University of Victoria)Active, CMINumerical simulation 2D, 3D-In the planar system configuration, the patient is oriented in a supine position and a resistively loaded bowtie antenna is used to scan the breast to create a synthetic planar array. In the cylindrical configuration, a resistively loaded dipole antenna was used to scan breast with the patient oriented in a prone position and the breast extending through the examination hole.- CMI was found to be a feasible tool for detecting and localizing breast tumors in 3D.
- Both system configurations showed similar efficiency in detecting and localizing breast tumors.
Hagness et al. [52] (2003, University of Wisconsin)Active, MISTPhantom study1–11 GHzA planar synthetic array of compact UWB antennas are placed on breast phantom with a small (<0.5 cm) synthetic tumor embedded. A data-adaptive algorithm removes the artifact caused by backscatter from the skin–breast interface. The signals were passed through a 3D space-time beamformer designed to image backscattered energy as a function of location.- The developed system yielded promising results in the detection and localization of very small synthetic tumors embedded in breast phantoms.
Bond et al. [51,65] (2003–2005, University of Wisconsin)Active, MISTPhantom study 2D-A planar array of 16 horn sensors and breast phantoms based on anatomically realistic MRI-derived FDTD models of the breast. A data-adaptive algorithm for removing artifacts from backscatter from the skin–breast interface.- Small lesions can be detected with high sensitivity regardless of location in the breast.
- Small tumors embedded in heterogeneous normal breast tissue are successfully detected in a wide range of numerical breast phantoms.
- The imaged backscatter from a 2 mm diameter tumor stood out significantly above the clutter generated by the inherent variations in the fibroglandular and adipose composition of the breast.
Xie et al. [66] (2006)Active, MSANumerical simulation 3D-An aperture array transmits and receives microwave pulses. A two-stage data adaptive robust Capon (RCB) algorithm was adopted along with a realistic 3D breast model simulated by the FDTD method.The system showed better resolution and noise rejection capabilities than existing methods.
Smith et al. [53,55,67] (2006–2013, Northumbria University)Active, HMIPhantom study 2D9.4 GHzTransmitting and receiving antenna were used along with a simulated breast phantom with tumor-like inclusions.- HMI has the ability to produce real-time images at significantly lower cost because it does not require expensive ultra-high-speed electronics.
- Experimental results using simulated breast phantoms provide confidence in the potential of this approach.
- More validation is required on the theory and proof-of-concept for medical applications.
Galvin et al. [68] (2010, University of Ireland Galway)Active, MISTPhantom study 2D-- A planar array of 16 horn sensors and breast phantoms based on anatomically realistic MRI-derived FDTD models of the breast.
- Both the artifact removal algorithm and the beamformer from Bond’s system [69] were modified to provide for multi-static data.
- The system successfully detected the presence of small tumors (5 mm in diameter) at various depths within the heterogeneous breast tissue.
- The quasi-multistatic system produces a significantly improved signal-to-clutter ratio when compared to the traditional monostatic MIST beamformer.
Son et al. [70,71] (2010–2012, Korea)Active, MWTPhantom study 2D, 3D0.5–3 GHz16 monopole transmitting, receiving (TRx) antennas in plane circular arrangement with breast pendant in coupling liquid. Two types of phantoms were used, circular and cylindrical.- The presented 2D MWT system demonstrated good sensitivity and reasonable spatial resolution of the reconstructed images of the breast and tumor phantoms.
- The scattered signals from the small spherical tumor were much smaller than in the case of the cylindrical tumor.
- The system was able to detect and reconstruct an image of a 5 mm in diameter spherical tumor phantom.
Aguilar et al. [72] (2013, University of Wisconsin- Maddison)Active, CMINumerical simulation and phantom study 3D1.36–3.03 GHz32 multi-band miniaturized slot-loaded patch antennas in a planar layout.- The study elucidated the trade-off between miniaturization via slot-loading and gain.
- The study revealed how the gain of the miniaturized patch antennas varies with the substrate dielectric constant and thickness.
- The results of the computational study suggested that miniaturized antennas are suitable candidates as array elements for multi-band microwave breast imaging systems where unidirectional radiation, environmental shielding, and dense spatial sampling of scattered fields are desired.
Wang et al. [56,57] (2013–2018, Auckland University of Technology and Hefei University of Technology)Active, HMINumerical simulation and phantom study 2D12.6 GHz16-element and 64-element uniform sensor array and breast phantoms based on published dielectric properties with air as the coupling medium. The split Bregman and orthogonal matching pursuit algorithms were applied.- Small tumors of diameter < 5 mm at different locations could be successfully detected.
- Both simulation and experimental results demonstrated that CS-HMAI can produce high-quality images and detect arbitrarily shaped small inclusions with random sizes and locations by using significantly fewer sensors and scanning times than regular HMAI.
Augusto et al. [73] (2016, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru)Active, HMIPhantom study 2D2–15 GHzBoth confocal and holographic system algorithms used single Vivaldi antenna for transmission and reception along with breast phantom with tumor-like inclusions.- Both the confocal and holographic algorithms demonstrated viability for the detection of tumors of diameter ≥ 15 mm.
- In the confocal algorithm, the concern is the contrast, while for the holographic algorithm, the concern is locating the tumor phantom without imaginary targets.
Bucci et al. [41] (2015, University of Naples Federico)Active, magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced MWINumerical simulation and phantom study 2D2 GHzMagnetic nanoparticles used as contrast agent along with breast phantoms with tumor-like inclusions.- The analysis presented provided an optimum design of a measurement device devoted to the implementation of this technique.
- Using 50 antennas on each of the eight measurement circles present in the design allowed the measurement of the differential field arising in a MNP-enhanced MWI experiment accurately, which in turn allowed the detection of cancerous tumors.
Meo et al. [74] (2017, University of Pavia, Italy)mm-wave frequency systemNumerical simulation 2D26.5–40 GHz32 antennas in conformal layout and the radiators are open-ended WR28 waveguides. Bio-heat equations and F-DMAS algorithm for image reconstruction.- A penetration depth of a few cm was achieved.
- Conformal layout of antenna better than linear layout.
- Estimated tumor position (41 mm) in close agreement with theoretical depth (40 mm).
Hammouch et al. [75] (2019, Mohammed V University in Rabat)Active, CMINumerical simulation 2D3.1–14 GHzMicrostrip patch antenna.- Results demonstrated the applicability of using CMI for monostatic UWB radar system in breast cancer detection.
- Results showed that CMI algorithm is valid for detection and localization of breast tumors.
- The method is of lower cost and is considered non-invasive radiation compared to other screening methods.
Islam et al. [76] (2019, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)Active, radar-basedNumerical simulation and phantom study: lab-made heterogeneous tumors 2D2.80–7.00 GHzA compact side slotted tapered slot UWB antenna is designed in which the slot antenna side is minimized. The antenna array, side-slotted Vivaldi, will be sending microwave pulses directed toward the suspected area. (9 antenna array, 8 × 50 scanned position).- The proposed UWB antenna-based MWI system provided real-time detection of breast tumors.
- A significant variation of backscattered signal exploits tumor cells of a breast.
- Tumor cells inside breast are detected using the side-slotted Vivaldi antennas.
Srinivasan et al. [77] (2019, SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology)Active, dielectric substrateNumerical simulation 2D, 3D2.45 GHzWearable jeans material used as dielectric substrate in which an antenna is designed as a sandwish model with slot loaded over patch and ground plane made of copper.- The study proposed a low-cost textile wearable antenna for breast cancer detection.
Soltani et al. [78] (2019, University of Waterloo)Active, microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging (MITAI)Numerical simulation 3D2.45 GHzThree different breast tissue types along with a tumor were placed in a tank filled with castor oil. The tissues were irradiated by a 2.45 GHz pulsed microwave source from a rectangular waveguide. The generated heat and pressure gradient in the biological tissue due to the electromagnetic wave irradiation were evaluated.- Thermoacoustic imaging is used to obtain maximum temperature and pressure variation at tumor.
- Location of tumor is related to detecting performance in MIRAI method. Tumors located in fatty tissues tend to be easier to detect than other which are located in transitional tissues.
- Size of tumor plays a role in detection and performance of MITAI technique.
- MITAI method can detect tumors of 0.5 cm diameters.
Sheeba et al. [79] (2019, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology)ActiveNumerical simulation and phantom study: human skin and breast model (normal and malignant tissues) 2D2.4 GHzFlexible soft-wear hexagonal patch antenna with jean substrate (with and without slot).- In simulation, the presence and absence of tumor as 20.3 A/m2 and 19 A/m2 and gain as 7.20 and 7.25 dB was noted in breast model in CST.
- The existence of the tumor is 25.9 A/m2 and the nonexistence of the tumor is 21.1 A/m2 and the gain is 6.91 dB for with and without tumor is 6.95 dB is noted using CST.
Geetharamani et al. [80] (2019, Anna University)Active, metamaterial-inspired TerahertzNumerical simulation and phantom study: normal and malignant tissues 2D1 THzMetamaterial-inspired THz antenna of a simple rectangular patch configuration integrated with complementary split ring resonator (CSRR).The experimental technique proposed was able to detect the tumor in the tested breast tissue model.
Islam et al. [81] (2019, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)ActiveNumerical simulation and phantom study: lab-made realistic heterogeneous tumors 2D, 3D2.7–11.2 GHzIndex Near-Zero Metasurface Loaded High Gain Antenna, 16 antenna arrays, 64 × 50 scanned position.- An efficient, viable, and low-cost testing system is proposed to detect multiple abnormalities of tumor clusters inside the breast.
Wang [58] (2019, Hefei University of Technology)Active, HMINumerical simulation 2D, 3D1–4 GHzSmall waveguide antenna simulated as a transmitter and detector.- Multi-frequency HMI algorithm can detect small breast lesions with higher accuracy compared to the single-frequency HMI.
- Proposed method improves image resolution which aids in developing vision tool for microwave diagnostic techniques.
Felício et al. [82] (2020, Universidade de Lisboa)Active, radar-basedNumerical simulation and phantom study 2D, 3D2–5 GHzDry setup, fixed cylindrical balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna (BAVA) configuration with a diameter of approximately 120 mm, artifact removal algorithm developed, webcam used for breast 3D surface reconstruction.- Obtained very good detection of the tumor in different positions (maximum positioning error was 10.8 mm)
- Lower contrast observed in fibroglandular tissue.
- Feasible setup for operation in real exams.
Abdollahi et al. [83] (2020, University of Manitoba)ActiveNumerical simulation 2D0.8, 0.85, 0.9, and 0.95 GHzPerfect electric conductor (PEC) chamber and 2D transverse magnetic (TM) transceivers in a circular array.- Tumors were well localized at all frequencies and with all incorporated prior-information maps.
- The highest AUC of over 0.99 was obtained for breast model II (fatty breast) while the lowest AUC values correspond to breast model I (heterogeneously dense breast)
- For all three breast models, no artifacts were created inside the fatty tissue.
Oloumi et al. [84] (2020, University of Alberta)Active, circular synthetic aperture radar (CSAR)Numerical simulation and phantom study 3D1 MHzUWB radar system (AVTECH AVP-3SA-C pulse generator, Vivaldi antennas, and sampling oscilloscope), a breast phantom, and a matching liquid container (vegetable oil)- Results from measurements and comparison with MRI image of the phantom demonstrated the capability of this method to improve the image quality.
- This experiment did not consider the effect of skin and adipose tissue, but numerical simulations showed that the distortion of the signal was not significant for the given operating frequency.
Kumari et al. [85] (2020, National Institute of Technology, Delhi, India)Active, near-field indirect HMIPhantom study2D8.5 GHzTwo Vivaldi antennas used as transmitter and receiver, directional coupler, variable attenuator, phase shifter, a magic Tee, power sensor.- The developed system was able to identify and locate tumors up to the minimum size of 4 mm and maximum depth of 25 mm in the phantom.
Ahmed et al. [86] (2020, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq)Active, radar-basedNumerical simulation and phantom study 3D6.1–12 GHz18 Peano patch antenna array arranged in a semi-sphere designed by CST Microwave studio simulator.- More than one antenna was needed around the breast to improve the resolution of the image of the image.
- The antenna showed strong pattern of omnidirectional radiation.
Iliopoulos et al. [87] (2020, University of Rennes, France)mm-wave frequency systemNumerical simulation and phantom study 2D20–40 GHzTransmitting and receiving antennas were manufactured in-house using laser ablation- Good agreement between simulation and theoretical results.
Rahpeima et al. [88] (2020, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran)Active, MITAINumerical simulation 3D2.45 GHzSimulations were performed using the COMSOL software.- More temperature increase detected in tumor area than in the other tissues.
- Tumor size did not have a significant impact on the efficiency of detection.
- Very small tumors with a radius of 0.25 cm were detectable.
- Tumors located in fatty tissues were much easier to detect than those in the glandular tissues.
- With augmentation of the irradiation power level or increasing the pulse width, stronger acoustic waves are produced to make tumor detection easier.
Miraoui et al. [89] (2020, University Mustapha Stambouli, Mascara, Algeria)Active, radar-based and ANNNumerical simulation 2D4 GHzBow-tie antennas for the transmission and reception, CST software used for the simulation.- The simulation results depicted that the ANN presented more precision in the detection and localization of tumors.
Coşğun et al. [90] (2020, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, 14030 Turkey)SPION-enhanced MWINumerical simulation and phantom study 2D1.9–2.02 GHz18 vertical dipole antennas placed below the metallic surface of the bed and equidistantly distributed. Breast and antenna suspended in epoxy resin. SPION tracer was used.- The proposed technique detected much smaller tumors as compared to the operation wavelengths between 1.8 cm and 7.5 cm for the simulation models.
- Despite the electric field difference, the factorization method was able to adequately reconstruct spatial variation of SPION tracers in the frontal plane of the breast.
Kaur and Kaur [91] (2020, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India)Active, synthetic aperture radar (SAR)Phantom study 2D4.9–10.9 GHzThree-layered stacked aperture coupled microstrip antenna (SACMPA) with a defected ground structure, a vector network analyzer (VNA), and an anechoic chamber.- The specific adsorption rate on the breast phantom at the frequencies of 5.7 GHz was 0.271 W/kg and at 6.5 GHz is 1.115 W/kg for 1 g of body tissue. This proved that the antenna was safe for human exposure (below 1.6 W/kg for 1 g).
- The antenna experimental measurements show a 93.3% match between the simulated and measured results.
Kaur and Kaur [92] (2020, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India)Active, radar-basedPhantom study 3D3.71–11.48 GHzFork-shaped microstrip patch antenna designed using Computer Simulation Tool: Microwave Studio software (CST MWS) V’18.- The simulated results show that more reflections, lesser specific absorption rate and more conduction current.
- Density was obtained in the presence of tumor as compared to a nonmalignant case.
Xiao et al. [93] (2020, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China)MWI with simulated annealingNumerical simulation and phantom study 2D, 3D6 GHzPatch antenna array working in multi-static mode, pulse pattern generator (Gaussian monocycle pulse), switching matrix, and oscilloscope.- Owing to simulated annealing algorithm, the proposed method was able to quickly and accurately find the optimal permittivity and achieve the accurate reconstruction of microwave breast image, making the detection process more efficient.
Mehranpour et al. [94] (2020, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran)Active, radar-basedPhantom study 2D1.3–6.8 GHzMARIA system with multi-static hemispherical array of modified UWB bowtie antenna.- The system successfully reconstructed tumor images (with a small radius of 7 mm).
- The proposed high-accuracy calibration (HAC) algorithm was better at detecting the cancerous tumor than the WA and WF methods.
Bocquet et al. [95] (1990, Lille University of Science and Technology)Passive, radiometryClinical trials on 97 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D2.5–3.5 GHzMulti-probe radiometer.- The acquisition method and software were improved after preliminary experiments on 72 random patients.
- For 18 patients, the technique gave good results: the malignant lesions had a radiometric ratio greater than 65%, while the benign lesions were characterized by a ratio smaller than 55%.
- Further investigation on seven other patients did not give the same good correlation between the radiometric ratio and the histological characteristics of the tumor.
Carr et al. [35] (2000, East Virginia Medical School)Passive, radiometryClinical trials on 138 patients: malignant tissues --ONCOSCAN system- Out of the 138 scans, 16 were excluded for technical malfunctions.
- There were 40 benign biopsies with positive ONCOSCAN scores.
- The positive predictive value of ONCOSCAN was 41% which was higher than that of the mammography (24%).
Table 4. Summary of relevant clinical microwave imaging studies for breast cancer detection.
Table 4. Summary of relevant clinical microwave imaging studies for breast cancer detection.
Author (Year, Location)MWI MethodStudy Type & DimensionsFrequency RangeMeasurement SystemFindings
Meaney et al. [16,29,37,38,39] (2000–2014, Dartmouth College)Active, MWTPhantom study and clinical trials on 500+ patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D300 MHz–3 GHzMonopole antenna array: latest system employed 16 transmitting antennas (Tx) and 15 receiving antennas (Rx) with patient lying in prone position and breast pendant in coupling solution.- The average relative permittivity of the breast may correlate with radiological breast density labels. - The best results were reported at a frequency of 1300 MHz.- In phantom studies, the reconstructed images of the breast phantoms with tumor-like inclusions were quite discernible.- Clinical trials demonstrated that small tumors could be detected, which confirmed that MWI has potential for early-stage breast cancer detection.- In monitoring the progress of neoadjuvant, changes in microwave properties were noticed which agreed well with the overall NCT treatment response.
Fear et al. [49,50,96] (2003–2012, University of Calgary)Active, TSARPhantom study and clinical trails on 8 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D0.05–15 GHzA single antenna first scans the pendant breast to determine breast volume compared to tank then a second coronal scan is performed for the tumor detection algorithm. Deconvolution is used to determine the thickness of the skin layer.- Phantom simulated data showed success in reducing the error percentage in both breast skin location and thickness estimates by more than half.- Clinical results showed that TSAR has an ability to detect and localize tumors with sizes > 4 mm in diameter.
Preece et al. [46,47,48,97] (2008–2016, University of Bristol)Active, MSAPhantom study and clinical trials on 86 patients: normal and malignant tissues 2D, 3D4–10 GHz16 stacked patch antennas located on a section of a hemisphere to better conform to the curvature of the breast. The patient rested in prone position with breast pendant in a ceramic cup filled with coupling liquid.- In phantom studies the system was successful at detecting tumors 4 to 6 mm in diameter.- The outcome of the clinical trial with the 31 element prototype was mixed.- The clinical trials with the 60 element system showed improvement in terms of reproducibility and accuracy.
Porter et al. [98] (2016, McGill University, Canada)ActiveClinical trials on 3 patients2–4 GHzMultistatic radar with the 16 sensors embedded in a wearable bra.- Scans were found to be repeatable, yet many sources of variability were identified, such as patient positioning.
Song et al. [99] (2017, Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan)ActiveClinical trials on 5 patients 3D3.1–10.6 GHz4 x 4 cross-shaped dome antennas array designed to be placed on the breast of a supine. Patient with the breast in contact with a plastic dome covering the antennas.- The 3D tumor localization in the imaging results are in agreement with the results of histopathology analysis. - The final confocal imaging results were consistent with those of MRI.
Yang et al. [100] (2017, Southern University of Science and Technology, China)ActivePhantom studies and clinical trials on 11 patients 2D4–8.5 GHzMulti-static virtual array with two ultra-wideband horn antennas controlled by mechanical rotation.- System was sensitive to the increase in the amount of tissue due to cell proliferation.
Kuwahara et al. [101] (2017, Shizuoka University, Japan)Active hybrid MIST-UWB deviceNumerical simulation and clinical trials on 2 patients 3D1–3 GHzBreast pendant through an opening in the table directly in contact with stacked patch antennas or a coupling shell of a biocompatible material.- Data correlation between the measured and calculated data is larger than 0.99. - Images were successfully reconstructed under the experimental conditions.
Rana et al. [102] (2019, London South Bank University)Active, radar-basedNumerical simulation study and clinical trials: normal and malignant tissues 2D1–9 GHzNon-ionizing microwave signals are transmitted through breast tissue and scattering parameters are received via moving transmitting and receiving antenna setup.- Study differentiated between normal breasts and without lesions breasts. - Results obtained from multilayer perceptron algorithm yielded higher overall specificity compared to results obtained from nearest neighbor algorithm. - The employment of machine learning on clinical data helped the radiologists in the diagnosis process and improved the detection sensitivity.
Sani et al. [103] (2019, Spin off of University of Perugia)ActiveNumerical simulation study and clinical trials: normal and malignant tissues 2D1–9 GHzApparatus constituted by one transmitting antenna and by one receiving antenna.- The proposed microwave imaging apparatus based on the Huygens principle is safe as it does not require breast compression and does not emit any ionizing radiation.
Song et al. [104] (2020, Hiroshima University)Active, radar-basedPhantom study and clinical trial on 1 patient: malignant tissues 3D3.5–15 GHzDetector composed of a step-motor, a control module, a radio-frequency (RF) module, and a 16-element dome antenna array.- The proposed method was effective in clutter suppression and improved image quality. - In the clinical test the estimated position of the tumor using the developed system was in good agreement with the physical tumor location examined by MRI and DbPET.
Vispa et al. [105] (2020, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy)Active, radar-basedPhantom study and clinical trials on 51 breasts: normal and malignant tissue (7 carcinoma, 9 fibroadenoma, and 5 microcalcifications) 2D1–9 GHzCup to hold breast, horn Tx antenna and microstrip monopole Rx antenna located inside a hub. Tx and Rx antennas connected to a vector network analyzer (VNA).- Clinical trials showed that microwave images of non-healthy breasts had a mean MAX/AVG of approximately 7% greater than those of the healthy breasts.
Norouzzadeh et al. [106] (2020, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran)Active, transmission radar-based systemNumerical simulation study, and clinical trials on 2 patients: normal and malignant tissue 2D1–9 GHzTwo low-loss plexiglass plates for breast compression, two UWB bowtie antennas for transmitting and receiving connected to an HP 8720C vector network analyzer. The whole system was controlled by an iPC25 using a Matlab interface.- For both patients, comparing the microwave image with the X-ray image confirmed tumor existence. - The attenuation of cancerous region was not constant, indicating that cancerous regions have inhomogeneous dielectric properties.

4. Image Reconstruction and Quality

4.1. Image Reconstruction

Recent advances in computational methods and microwave hardware design are the reasons why many researchers nowadays are considering MWI as a possible cost-effective breast cancer screening modality. One of the important aspects of MWI is the ability to reconstruct images using the collected data, as well as assess their quality.
As mentioned in the previous sections, the objective of MWT is to map the dielectric properties of an OI by collecting measurements at antennas positioned outside the imaging domain [18,107]. Furthermore, as mentioned earlier, the reconstruction of dielectric properties involves solving a mathematical problem that is usually classified as an inverse scattering problem, which are nonlinear, thus requiring iterative methods in order to reach a solution. These equations can be linearized using different approximations, such as the Born approximation. However, in medical imaging the inherent heterogeneity of tissues and high dielectric contrast can lead to non-real solutions. Therefore, the use of iterative optimization algorithms such as the distorted BIM (DBIM), Gauss–Newton inversion (GNI) [108], and the contrast source inversion (CSI) [109,110] methods was proposed. These methods are used to solve the numerical problem, formulated either using integral equations (IEs) or partial differential equations (PDEs). The IE form could be solved using the method-of-moments, whereas the PDE formulation could be solved using the finite-difference method (FDM) or the finite element method (FEM). Each algorithm and formulation has its pros and cons [57,111]. Nevertheless, solving these inverse scattering problems is computationally expensive.
Unlike MWT, UWB radar-based imaging is less computationally demanding because it does not require solving an inverse scattering problem. The quality of a radar-based microwave breast image is largely dependent on the clutter rejection capability of the imaging algorithm and the efficacy of early-time artifact removal methods. Some of the algorithms used to reconstruct images from UWB MWI systems include [112]:
  • Delay-and-sum (DAS);
  • Delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS);
  • Improved delay-and-sum (IDAS);
  • Coherence-factor-based DAS (CF-DAS);
  • Channel-ranked DAS (CR-DAS);
  • Robust Capon beam former (RCB).
Sagheer et al. [113] compared the image reconstruction performance of DAS and DMAS. Although DAS is a simple MWI reconstruction algorithm with real-time execution, the experimental results illustrated that it had limited capabilities in suppressing noise and the artifacts. On the other hand, DMAS offered high-contrast resolution but required longer computational time. The authors in [112] conducted a study in which they inspected the performance of the aforementioned reconstruction algorithms in the presence of noise by using experimental breast phantoms. The breast phantoms employed in this study were developed at the University of Calgary and scanned using a TSAR system prototype. The image quality metrics used to evaluate these algorithms were the signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR), the signal-to-mean ratio (SMR), and localization error [112]. SCR is defined as the ratio of tumor intensity to clutter intensity in the image. SMR is defined as the ratio of the average intensity of the tumor region to the overall image. The localization error is the distance between the known tumor location and the detected location. A follow-up to the aforementioned study in [114] was conducted where the six imaging algorithms were used to reconstruct 3D images of five clinical patients. The results showed that DAS was able to detect most malignancies; however, clutter was observed in the obtained images. IDAS and CF-DAS improved the image quality, but they often failed to correctly localize the malignancy, especially when there were multiple lesions and/or heterogeneous breast tissue. CR-DAS did not provide significant improvement compared to DAS. In addition, RCB suffered from the presence of coherent interferences from multiple lesions and the heterogeneity of the breast.

4.2. Reconstruction Quality

Image quality can determine the accuracy of the imaging test and influence the clinicians’ diagnostic decision. Recent improvements in imaging techniques and instrumentation have improved early diagnosis and treatment. However, a quantitative method is needed to assess these technological advances.
Quantitative assessments of diagnostic images’ quality are usually reported in terms of spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Spatial resolution refers to the ability of an imaging system to differentiate between closely spaced objects/features. Spatial resolution is expressed mathematically by line-spread functions (LSFs) and point-spread functions (PSFs). Generally speaking, the narrower the LSF the higher the spatial resolution, and for a perfect representation of the object, the PSF would be a delta function in all three dimensions [115].
Certain operating and design parameters, such as the operating frequency and number of antennas in the array, affect the quality of the reconstructed images. Given the novelty of MWI in biomedical applications, the effect of these parameters on the spatial resolution, SNR, and CNR is not fully understood yet. Several studies have been conducted in an attempt to determine just how different design and operating parameters affect the reconstructed image quality. This topic is considered at the forefront of challenges which, once resolved, would make MWI systems a serious contender in the medical imaging circles. In a study conducted by Chang et al. [116], the spatial resolution of microwave images was found to be dominated by the bandwidth of the microwave signal. According to their study, the higher the chosen frequency, the higher the image quality. However, at high frequencies, the signals propagating through the tissue will experience serious attenuation. As such, the choice of the operation frequency requires a trade-off between resolution and penetration depth. The study showed that the attenuation is about 4 dB/cm when microwaves penetrate the tissue. Regarding SNR, Nikolova and McCombe [69] proposed a method to assess the SNR of MWI acquisition systems. The approach evaluates noise by taking the standard deviation of the signal in the feature-free region (a region where no signal is expected), while the signal strength is the mean value in the region of interest (ROI) in a calibration object whose contrast distribution is already known.

5. Challenges and Future Research Directions

As mentioned in earlier sections, MWI is a promising medical imaging modality that can be a cost-effective alternative to existing imaging modalities. However, most of the feasibility studies carried out so far were performed through numerical simulations, which are not enough to consider MWI systems in clinical settings. As seen from the discussion of the research studies relevant to this technology, clinical application to MWI has been attempted by some research groups. However, there are still many technical challenges facing MWI as a breast cancer detection tool that still need to be addressed to improve this technique and achieve its full capacity. Several research directions are discussed in the following subsections [11].

5.1. Effective Coupling of Microwave Signal

For tomographic systems, a big challenge lies in effectively coupling the transmitted microwave signal to the body.This can be attributed to the vast differences in dielectric properties between the breast tissue and the medium in which the antennas are placed. As a result, strong reflections occur at the tissue–medium boundary, weakening the signal penetrating the body. When the weak scattered signals are used for imaging, a very large dynamic range is produced which results in having some low-frequency signals attenuated or completely lost. An approach to minimize coupling effects is to use a more impedance-compatible coupling liquid. Meaney et al. [37,38,39] substituted saline with a water–glycerin mixture as a coupling medium. They investigated different ratios of water and glycerin and found that an 83:17 glycerin to water mixture produced nominal coupling effects [38]. A research group at the University of Bristol designed an antenna in a hemispherical shape to better fit the curvature of the breast [46,47,48]. Felício et al. [82] proposed a radar-based MWI method using a dry setup that does not require a coupling liquid. In their method, a webcam was used to estimate the breast three-dimensional surface information and its distance to the antennas. This information was incorporated into a signal processing algorithm based on singular value decomposition to remove the skin backscattering caused by the absence of coupling liquid.

5.2. Contrast Agents

MWI is based on the fact that a significant difference in the electrical properties of malignant and healthy tissues exists. However, if this difference is small, detecting tumors using MWI becomes a much more challenging task. A proposed solution to this problem is to use contrasting agents. Contrary to healthy tissues, the leaky vasculature of tumors facilitates the diffusion of contrasting agents into tumors, enhancing their electrical properties. For example, Bucci et al. [41] used MNPs as their contrasting agent. The method is based on the reconstruction of the magnetic contrast induced by the MNPs in the presence and the absence of the polarizing magnetic field. The findings of this study were quite promising, as significant enhancement in contrast was observed. Another example is the recent work carried out by Kaye et al. [117], where MNPs were used to enhance breast imaging inside a ferromagnetic resonance imaging chamber.

5.3. Signal Processing and Imaging Algorithms

In MWI, breast tumor detection is performed by measuring the backscattered data which may include skin backscatter and late time clutter response. Thus, robust signal processing is required to remove the unwanted signals. Moreover, quantitative MWI algorithms are known to have inherent challenges. For example, in solving inverse problems, which are needed for MWT, issues such as nonlinearity and the ill-posedness arise. Oscillations can occur in the estimated electrical properties at the boundary of the high-dielectric-contrast tissues, even with the application of different regularization methods. Recently, machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been used to create intelligent decision-support systems to help clinicians recognize malignant lesions in breasts. For instance, convolutional neural networks (CNN or ConvNet) can be fed multiple scattering data as the forward-pass; then the CNN learning algorithm combines the extracted features and aggregates them in a nonlinear fashion to predict the output. The advantages of CNN-based learning include improved computational efficiency, especially when solving inverse scattering problems. Examples of studies that used machine learning and deep learning neural networks to simplify the inverse problem are given in [102,118,119,120,121]. In addition, a 2D-based imaging algorithm may not work for a 3D biological object and might lead to inaccurate reconstruction results. For instance, when cylindrical phantoms are used in 2D studies, ideally the heights of the used cylinders must be infinitely large for the approximations to be applicable. However, this is not feasible in practical applications; thus, phantoms of finite heights will affect the accuracy of the results obtained. This highlights the need for 3D modeling; however, 3D imaging algorithms are usually computationally expensive. Thus, further work is required to develop inversion algorithms with higher efficiency and accuracy [11,122].

5.4. Antennas and Measurement System

As mentioned in the previous section, ill-posedness is one of the problems encountered in solving the inverse problem. To address this issue, some researchers proposed increasing the number of antennas used to acquire larger scattered field datasets [11]. However, there is a physical limitation on the number of antennas that can be used. Moreover, placing the antennas too close to each other may result in high mutual coupling between the antennas, introducing errors in the measured scattered field. One of the conventional methods to address antenna coupling involves inserting a decoupling slab between the radiating antennas. Other proposed techniques include the use of cavity-backed substrate removal, defected ground structures, metamaterial insulators, slotted complementary split-ring resonators, defected wall structure, and employing electromagnetic band gap structures between antennas [123]. Other errors that might be introduced in a measurement setup are cable losses, phase shifts, or mismatch at the connectors [124]. A calibration process to remove some of these errors was suggested by Gilmore et al. [124]. The authors also provided a method to avoid the frequencies where the coupling is large enough to prevent successful imaging in a wideband measurement setup. Another method to avoid coupling is to use a virtual array to scan the body, but this comes at the cost of increased scan time. Therefore, the design of a measurement setup having an optimum scan time, low error, and antennas having a minimal mutual coupling, as well as effective calibration methods for the system, can be a future research direction [11].

5.5. Frequency Bandwidth and Resolution

Another important issue in MWI is choosing a suitable imaging frequency. As discussed in Section 2, MWI is used in many different applications, each of which requires a different operating frequency. In MWI, the choice of a suitable frequency bandwidth is a trade-off between penetration depth and resolution. The depth of penetration is inversely proportional to the frequency due to the increased attenuation in the tissues at relatively high frequencies. However, the resolution is proportional to the frequency because of the decrease in wavelength and pulse durations accompanying increased operating frequencies. Thus, different frequencies are used to image different body parts due to the difference in thickness of the body part being imaged and the tissue compositions. Hence, further investigations are required to achieve a standardized optimum frequency and an acceptable resolution [11].

5.6. Interference and Noise

Clinical environments are ones in which there are significant amounts of electromagnetic interference. Using an MWI system in a clinical environment is a challenging task as it will be affected by the electromagnetic interference and noise from sources such as mobile phones, wireless local area network, other radiology equipment, fluorescent lights, computers, and noisy electrical power supplies. Surges may also contribute to interference and noise in a medical facility [125]. Thus, further research is required to develop MWI systems that are robust against interferences as well as electromagnetically compatible with other medical systems [11,125].

5.7. Hybrid and Portable Systems

Some researchers are investigating the coupling of MWI with ultrasound transducers in hybrid microwave–acoustic imaging [126,127]. Another direction that is being explored is compressive sensing to improve the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis [11]. Moreover, developing portable MWI devices is an area that has seen a lot of interest recently, given the benefits of portable imaging devices for patients’ comfort and medical preparedness in cases of natural disasters. Researchers at Hiroshima University investigated the possibility of developing a handheld impulse-radar breast cancer detector and reported promising results [99]. Adachi et al. [128] reported on a radar-based portable MWI system for detecting breast cancer. The results showed that the system can be safely used and that it showed great potential in detecting breast cancer, including non-invasive ductal carcinoma and micro-invasive carcinoma, which were not as easily detected by mammography due to dense breast tissue. Other reports on portable MWI systems are detailed in [76,129,130,131,132].

5.8. Millimeter Wave Imaging

Recently, there has been increased interest in millimeter wave (mm-wave) frequencies, as this represents a natural continuation of the research path at microwave frequencies. In addition, this is facilitated by the technological advances in the design of transmission and reception systems that function at those mm-wave frequencies, as well as cost reduction. One of the pioneers in this field is the research group at the University of Pavia that investigated the use of mm-wave for breast cancer imaging [133]. The system was operated at a frequency of 30 GHz and it was demonstrated that a penetration depth of a few centimeters was achieved. Moreover, the authors showed that a conformal system layout is better than the linear layout, as the target position was identified in the breast model at a depth of around 41 mm, which can be considered in good agreement with the theoretical depth of 40 mm. In another study, Iliopoulos et al. [87] proposed a field-focusing technique based on a convex optimization method to improve the penetration of mm-waves into tissue-mimicking phantoms. The theoretical and simulation results were in good agreement, which validated the overall approach.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, breast cancer is a serious threat to women’s health worldwide. Numerous research studies have stressed the significance of early detection in the management and treatment of breast cancer. Although current imaging methods used in breast cancer screening are effective, they still have some limitations. MWI, as an early breast cancer detection tool, has attracted increased interest from researchers worldwide. With a variety of promising approaches (passive radiometry and active, which in turn includes tomography and radar-based imaging) and several research groups involved, there are good reasons to believe that microwave breast cancer detection will become a successful screening tool either as a standalone technology or as a complement to conventional mammography. This paper provided an overview of the rationale, methods, advances, and ongoing research of MWI in breast cancer detection applications. An exhaustive discussion of the working principle behind MWI along with both its passive and active variations was provided. Moreover, a classification of some of the most pertinent studies to this technology was presented. The paper showed that the reviewed numerical, experimental, and clinical studies reported promising results. Nonetheless, there is still an enormous amount of research and development to be carried out in order to achieve the full capacity of this technology. The paper discussed the challenges and future research directions that still need to be addressed to improve MWI in clinical applications, including better hardware design, signal-processing methods, and image reconstruction algorithms.

Author Contributions

N.A., S.E.-A., and S.D. designed the research ideas. N.A. and S.E.-A. performed the research. S.D. supervised the research. N.A. and S.E.-A. drafted the first version of the research manuscript. N.A., S.D., and A.Z. prepared and wrote the current version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work in this paper was supported, in part, by the Open Access Program from the American University of Sharjah (Award #: OAPCEN-1410-E00041). This paper represents the opinions of the authors and does not mean to represent the position or opinions of the American University of Sharjah.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

N.A. and S.E.-A. thank the Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program at the American University of Sharjah for funding their graduate studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BIMBorn Iterative Method
CF DASCoherence Factor Based Delay-And-Sum
CMIConfocal Microwave Imaging
CNRContrast-to-Noise ratio
CR DASChannel Ranked Delay-And-Sum
CSCompressive Sensing
CSARCircular Synthetic Aperture Radar
DASDelay-And-Sum
DBIMDistorted Born Iterative Method
DMASDelay-Multiply-And-Sum
FDGFluorodeoxyglucose
FDTDFinite Difference Time Domain
FEMFinite Element Method
FIRFinite Impulse Response
HMIHolographic Microwave Imaging
HMIAHolographic Microwave Imaging Array
IDASImproved Delay-And-Sum
IC-DASIteratively Corrected Delay-And-Sum
kNNk-Nearest Neighbor
LSFLine Spread Function
MISTMicrowave Imaging via Space Time
MITAIMicrowave-induced thermoacoustic imaging
MLPMultilayer Perceptron
MNPMagnetic Nanoparticles
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
MSAMultistatic Adaptive
MWIMicrowave Imaging
MWTMicrowave Tomography
NCTNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy
PDEPartial Differential Equation
PETPositron Emission Tomography
PSFPoint Spread Function
RCBRobust Capon Beamformer
ROIRegion of Interest
SARSynthetic Aperture Radar
SCRSignal-to-Clutter Ratio
SMRSignal-to-Mean Ratio
SNRSignal-to-Noise Ratio
SVMSupport Vector Machine
TDSTime Domain Spectroscopy
TSARTissue Sensing Adaptive Radar
USUltrasound
UWBUltra Wideband
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Fuchs, H.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Vnencak-Jones, C.; Berger, M.; Pao, W. Types of Molecular Tumor Testing. 2016. Available online: https://www.mycancergenome.org/content/molecular-medicine/types-of-molecular-tumor-testing/ (accessed on 27 February 2022).
  4. Nover, A.B.; Jagtap, S.; Anjum, W.; Yegingil, H.; Shih, W.Y.; Shih, W.H.; Brooks, A.D. Modern breast cancer detection: A technological review. J. Biomed. Imaging 2009, 2009, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kwon, S.; Lee, S. Recent advances in microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2016, 2016, 5054912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heywang-Köbrunner, S.H.; Hacker, A.; Sedlacek, S. Advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening. Breast Care 2011, 6, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pastorino, M. Microwave Imaging; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 208. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabriel, C.; Gabriel, S.; Corthout, y.E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Chandra, R.; Zhou, H.; Balasingham, I.; Narayanan, R.M. On the opportunities and challenges in microwave medical sensing and imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 1667–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hamidipour, A.; Henriksson, T.; Hopfer, M.; Planas, R.; Semenov, S. Electromagnetic tomography for brain imaging and stroke diagnostics: Progress towards clinical application. In Emerging Electromagnetic Technologies for Brain Diseases Diagnostics, Monitoring and Therapy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 59–86. [Google Scholar]
  13. Semenov, S.; Kellam, J.; Sizov, Y.; Nazarov, A.; Williams, T.; Nair, B.; Pavlovsky, A.; Posukh, V.; Quinn, M. Microwave tomography of extremities: 1. Dedicated 2D system and physiological signatures. Phys. Med. Biol. 2011, 56, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meaney, P.M.; Goodwin, D.; Golnabi, A.H.; Zhou, T.; Pallone, M.; Geimer, S.D.; Burke, G.; Paulsen, K.D. Clinical microwave tomographic imaging of the calcaneus: A first-in-human case study of two subjects. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 3304–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zamani, A.; Rezaeieh, S.A.; Bialkowski, K.S.; Abbosh, A.M. Boundary estimation of imaged object in microwave medical imaging using antenna resonant frequency shift. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 66, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grzegorczyk, T.M.; Meaney, P.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Paulsen, K.D. Fast 3-D tomographic microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2012, 31, 1584–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Modiri, A.; Goudreau, S.; Rahimi, A.; Kiasaleh, K. Review of breast screening: Toward clinical realization of microwave imaging. Med. Phys. 2017, 44, e446–e458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Conceição, R.C.; Mohr, J.J.; O’Halloran, M. An Introduction to Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moloney, B.M.; O’Loughlin, D.; Abd Elwahab, S.; Kerin, M.J. Breast Cancer Detection–A Synopsis of Conventional Modalities and the Potential Role of Microwave Imaging. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Misilmani, H.M.E.; Naous, T.; Khatib, S.K.A.; Kabalan, K.Y. A Survey on Antenna Designs for Breast Cancer Detection Using Microwave Imaging. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 102570–102594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aldhaeebi, M.A.; Alzoubi, K.; Almoneef, T.S.; Bamatraf, S.M.; Attia, H.; M Ramahi, O. Review of Microwaves Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection. Sensors 2020, 20, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chaudhary, S. Dielectric properties of normal and malignant human breast tissues at radiowave and microwave frequencies. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 1984, 21, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  23. Surowiec, A.J.; Stuchly, S.S.; Barr, J.R.; Swarup, A. Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988, 35, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Campbell, A.; Land, D. Dielectric properties of female human breast tissue measured in vitro at 3.2 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1992, 37, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Joines, W.T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Jirtle, R.L. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med. Phys. 1994, 21, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choi, J.W.; Cho, J.; Lee, Y.; Yim, J.; Kang, B.; Oh, K.K.; Jung, W.H.; Kim, H.J.; Cheon, C.; Lee, H.D.; et al. Microwave detection of metastasized breast cancer cells in the lymph node; potential application for sentinel lymphadenectomy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2004, 86, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lazebnik, M.; McCartney, L.; Popovic, D.; Watkins, C.B.; Lindstrom, M.J.; Harter, J.; Sewall, S.; Magliocco, A.; Booske, J.H.; Okoniewski, M.; et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lazebnik, M.; Popovic, D.; McCartney, L.; Watkins, C.B.; Lindstrom, M.J.; Harter, J.; Sewall, S.; Ogilvie, T.; Magliocco, A.; Breslin, T.M.; et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 6093–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; Li, D.; Poplack, S.P.; Paulsen, K.D. A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2000, 48, 1841–1853. [Google Scholar]
  30. Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Perregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; Preda, L.; Bellomi, M. Dielectric Properties Characterization From 0.5 to 50 GHz of Breast Cancer Tissues. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Peregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; et al. Experimental validation of the dielectric permittivity of breast cancer tissues up to 50 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Pavia, Italy, 20–22 September 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Bozzi, M.; Perregrini, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Svelto, F.; Summers, P.E.; Renne, G.; et al. Dielectric properties of breast tissues: Experimental results up to 50 GHz. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018), London, UK, 9–13 April 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fear, E.C. Microwave imaging of the breast. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 4, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fear, E.C.; Hagness, S.C.; Meaney, P.M.; Okoniewski, M.; Stuchly, M.A. Enhancing breast tumor detection with near-field imaging. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2002, 3, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carr, K.L.; Cevasco, P.; Dunlea, P.; Shaeffer, J. Radiometric sensing: An adjuvant to mammography to determine breast biopsy. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No. 00CH37017), Boston, MA, USA, 11–16 June 2000; Volume 2, pp. 929–932. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stec, B.; Dobrowolski, A.; Susek, W. Multifrequency microwave thermograph for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 51, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; di Florio-Alexander, R.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Geimer, S.D.; Zhou, T.; Paulsen, K.D. Microwave tomography in the context of complex breast cancer imaging. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010; pp. 3398–3401. [Google Scholar]
  38. Meaney, P.M.; Fanning, M.W.; Raynolds, T.; Fox, C.J.; Fang, Q.; Kogel, C.A.; Poplack, S.P.; Paulsen, K.D. Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography. Acad. Radiol. 2007, 14, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Meaney, P.M.; Kaufman, P.A.; Muffly, L.S.; Click, M.; Poplack, S.P.; Wells, W.A.; Schwartz, G.N.; di Florio-Alexander, R.M.; Tosteson, T.D.; Li, Z.; et al. Microwave imaging for neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: Initial clinical experience. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, R35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, L. Early diagnosis of breast cancer. Sensors 2017, 17, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bucci, O.M.; Crocco, L.; Scapaticci, R. On the optimal measurement configuration for magnetic nanoparticles-enhanced breast cancer microwave imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Guang-dong, L.; Ye-rong, Z. An Overview of Active Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection. CA J. Nanjing Univ. Posts Telecommun. 2010, 30, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bidhendi, H.K.; Jafari, H.M.; Genov, R. Ultra-wideband imaging systems for breast cancer detection. In Ultra-Wideband and 60 GHz Communications for Biomedical Applications; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 83–103. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hagness, S.C.; Taflove, A.; Bridges, J.E. Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: Fixed-focus and antenna-array sensors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 45, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hagness, S.C.; Taflove, A.; Bridges, J.E. Three-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: Design of an antenna-array element. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1999, 47, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Klemm, M.; Craddock, I.; Leendertz, J.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R. Experimental and clinical results of breast cancer detection using UWB microwave radar. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, 5–12 July 2008; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  47. Klemm, M.; Craddock, I.J.; Leendertz, J.A.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R. Radar-based breast cancer detection using a hemispherical antenna array-Experimental results. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 1692–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Henriksson, T.; Klemm, M.; Gibbins, D.; Leendertz, J.; Horseman, T.; Preece, A.; Benjamin, R.; Craddock, I. Clinical trials of a multistatic UWB radar for breast imaging. In Proceedings of the 2011 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference, Loughborough, UK, 14–15 November 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fear, E.; Sill, J. Preliminary investigations of tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast tumor detection. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37439), Cancun, Mexico, 17–21 September 2003; Volume 4, pp. 3787–3790. [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams, T.C.; Fear, E.C.; Westwick, D.T. Tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast cancer detection-investigations of an improved skin-sensing method. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2006, 54, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bond, E.J.; Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Van Veen, B.D. Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early detection of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2003, 51, 1690–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Van Veen, B.D.; van der Weide, D. Experimental investigation of microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for breast cancer detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 8–13 June 2003; Volume 1, pp. 379–382. [Google Scholar]
  53. Elsdon, M.; Leach, M.; Skobelev, S.; Smith, D. Microwave holographic imaging of breast cancer. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, Hangzhou, China, 16–17 August 2007; pp. 966–969. [Google Scholar]
  54. Elsdon, M.; Yurduseven, O.; Smith, D. Early stage breast cancer detection using indirect microwave holography. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2013, 143, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Smith, D.; Yurduseven, O.; Livingstone, B. The use of indirect holographic techniques for microwave imaging. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Microwave Techniques (COMITE), Pardubice, Czech Republic, 17–18 April 2013; pp. 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, L.; Simpkin, R.; Al-Jumaily, A. Holographic microwave imaging array: Experimental investigation of breast tumour detection. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Electromagnetics, Applications and Student Innovation Competition, Hong Kong, China, 1–3 August 2013; pp. 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, L.; Fatemi, M. Compressive Sensing Holographic Microwave Random Array Imaging of Dielectric Inclusion. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 56477–56487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, L. Multi-Frequency Holographic Microwave Imaging for Breast Lesion Detection. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 83984–83993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bardati, F.; Iudicello, S. Modeling the visibility of breast malignancy by a microwave radiometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 55, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhurbenko, V.; Rubæk, T.; Krozer, V.; Meincke, P. Design and realisation of a microwave three-dimensional imaging system with application to breast-cancer detection. IET Microwaves Antennas Propag. 2010, 4, 2200–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Souvorov, A.E.; Bulyshev, A.E.; Semenov, S.Y.; Svenson, R.H.; Tatsis, G.P. Two-dimensional computer analysis of a microwave flat antenna array for breast cancer tomography. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2000, 48, 1413–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bulyshev, A.E.; Semenov, S.Y.; Souvorov, A.E.; Svenson, R.H.; Nazarov, A.G.; Sizov, Y.E.; Tatsis, G.P. Computational modeling of three-dimensional microwave tomography of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 48, 1053–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fear, E.C.; Li, X.; Hagness, S.C.; Stuchly, M.A. Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Localization of tumors in three dimensions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 49, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Fear, E.; Stuchly, M. Confocal microwave imaging for breast tumor detection: A study of resolution and detection ability. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–28 October 2001; Volume 3, pp. 2355–2358. [Google Scholar]
  65. Li, X.; Bond, E.J.; Van Veen, B.D.; Hagness, S.C. An overview of ultra-wideband microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early-stage breast-cancer detection. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2005, 47, 19–34. [Google Scholar]
  66. Xie, Y.; Guo, B.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Stoica, P. Multistatic adaptive microwave imaging for early breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 53, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elsdon, M.; Leach, M.; Fdo, M.J.; Foti, S.; Smith, D. Early Stage Breast Cancer Detection using Indirect Microwave Holography. In Proceedings of the 2006 European Microwave Conference, Manchester, UK, 10–15 September 2006; pp. 1256–1259. [Google Scholar]
  68. O’Halloran, M.; Jones, E.; Glavin, M. Quasi-multistatic MIST beamforming for the early detection of breast cancer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 57, 830–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. McCombe, J.J.; Nikolova, N.K. SNR assessment of microwave imaging systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI), Memphis, TN, USA, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 149–150. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kwon, K.C.; Lim, Y.T.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, N.; Park, C.; Yoo, K.H.; Son, S.H.; Jeon, S.I. Microwave tomography analysis system for breast tumor detection. J. Med. Syst. 2012, 36, 1757–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Son, S.H.; Simonov, N.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.M.; Jeon, S.I. Preclinical prototype development of a microwave tomography system for breast cancer detection. ETRI J. 2010, 32, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aguilar, S.M.; Al-Joumayly, M.A.; Burfeindt, M.J.; Behdad, N.; Hagness, S.C. Multiband miniaturized patch antennas for a compact, shielded microwave breast imaging array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 62, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Medina, Y.; Augusto, M.; Paz, A.V. Microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Experimental comparison of Confocal and Holography algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE ANDESCON, Arequipa, Peru, 19–21 October 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  74. Di Meo, S.; Espin-Lopez, P.F.; Martellosio, A.; Pasian, M.; Matrone, G.; Bozzi, M.; Magenes, G.; Mazzanti, A.; Perregrini, L.; Svelto, F.; et al. On the Feasibility of Breast Cancer Imaging Systems at Millimeter-Waves Frequencies. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 1795–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hammouch, N.; Ammor, H. A confocal microwave imaging implementation for breast cancer detection. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2019, 7, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  76. Islam, M.; Mahmud, M.; Islam, M.T.; Kibria, S.; Samsuzzaman, M. A Low Cost and Portable Microwave Imaging System for Breast Tumor Detection Using UWB Directional Antenna array. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Srinivasan, D.; Gopalakrishnan, M. Breast Cancer Detection Using Adaptable Textile Antenna Design. J. Med. Syst. 2019, 43, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Soltani, M.; Rahpeima, R.; Kashkooli, F.M. Breast cancer diagnosis with a microwave thermoacoustic imaging technique—A numerical approach. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2019, 57, 1497–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sheeba, I.R.; Jayanthy, T. Design and Analysis of a Flexible Softwear Antenna for Tumor Detection in Skin and Breast Model. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2019, 107, 887–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Geetharamani, G.; Aathmanesan, T. Metamaterial inspired THz antenna for breast cancer detection. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Islam, M.T.; Samsuzzaman, M.; Kibria, S.; Misran, N.; Islam, M.T. Metasurface Loaded High Gain Antenna based Microwave Imaging using Iteratively Corrected Delay Multiply and Sum Algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Felício, J.M.; Bioucas-Dias, J.M.; Costa, J.R.; Fernandes, C.A. Microwave Breast Imaging Using a Dry Setup. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2020, 6, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abdollahi, N.; Jeffrey, I.; LoVetri, J. Improved Tumor Detection via Quantitative Microwave Breast Imaging Using Eigenfunction-Based Prior. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2020, 6, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Oloumi, D.; Winter, R.S.C.; Kordzadeh, A.; Boulanger, P.; Rambabu, K. Microwave Imaging of Breast Tumor Using Time-Domain UWB Circular-SAR Technique. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2020, 39, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kumari, V.; Ahmed, A.; Kanumuri, T.; Shakher, C.; Sheoran, G. Early detection of cancerous tissues in human breast utilizing near field microwave holography. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2020, 30, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ahmed, S.S.; Mahdi, J.F.; Kadhim, M.A. Design of Ultra-Wideband Microwave Antenna Array for Detection Breast Cancer Tumours. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 881, 012112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Iliopoulos, I.; Di Meo, S.; Pasian, M.; Zhadobov, M.; Pouliguen, P.; Potier, P.; Perregrini, L.; Sauleau, R.; Ettorre, M. Enhancement of Penetration of Millimeter Waves by Field Focusing Applied to Breast Cancer Detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rahpeima, R.; Soltani, M.; Kashkooli, F.M. Numerical Study of Microwave Induced Thermoacoustic Imaging for Initial Detection of Cancer of Breast on Anatomically Realistic Breast Phantom. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 196, 105606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Miraoui, A.; Sidi, L.M.; Meriah, M. Detection and Localization of Breast Tumor in 2D Using Microwave Imaging. In Intelligent Computing; Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 132–141. [Google Scholar]
  90. Coşğun, S.; Bilgin, E.; Çayören, M. Microwave imaging of breast cancer with factorization method: SPIONs as contrast agent. Med. Phys. 2020, 47, 3113–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kaur, G.; Kaur, A. Breast tissue tumor detection using ‘S’ parameter analysis with an UWB stacked aperture coupled microstrip patch antenna having a ‘+’ shaped defected ground structure. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2020, 12, 635–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kaur, A.; Kaur, A. Monostatic Radar Based Ultra-Wideband Microwave Imaging System Featuring a Miniature Fork Shaped Microstrip Patch Antenna with a Reduced DGS for Early Breast Tumor Detection. In Intelligent Communication, Control and Devices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  93. Xiao, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, H.; Kikkawa, T. Optimal microwave breast imaging using quality metrics and simulated annealing algorithm. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mehranpour, M.; Jarchi, S.; Ghorbani, A.; Keshtkar, A. A novel approach of high-resolution UWB microwave imaging system based on an improved 3D back-projection method for early-stage breast cancer detection applications. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2021, 13, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bocquet, B.; Van de Velde, J.; Mamouni, A.; Leroy, Y.; Giaux, G.; Delannoy, J.; Delvalee, D. Microwave radiometric imaging at 3 GHz for the exploration of breast tumors. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1990, 38, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bourqui, J.; Sill, J.M.; Fear, E.C. A prototype system for measuring microwave frequency reflections from the breast. J. Biomed. Imaging 2012, 2012, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Preece, A.W.; Craddock, I.; Shere, M.; Jones, L.; Winton, H.L. MARIA M4: Clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 033502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Porter, E.; Duff, K.; Popovic, M.; Coates, M. Investigation of time-domain microwave radar with breast clinic patients. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 10–15 April 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Song, H.; Sasada, S.; Kadoya, T.; Okada, M.; Arihiro, K.; Xiao, X.; Kikkawa, T. Detectability of Breast Tumor by a Hand-held Impulse-Radar Detector: Performance Evaluation and Pilot Clinical Study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Yang, F.; Sun, L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H.; Pan, D.; Wu, R.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q. A large-scale clinical trial of radar-based microwave breast imaging for Asian women: Phase I. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–14 July 2017; pp. 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kuwahara, Y. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection. In Breast Imaging; Malik, A.M., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Rana, S.P.; Dey, M.; Tiberi, G.; Sani, L.; Vispa, A.; Raspa, G.; Duranti, M.; Ghavami, M.; Dudley, S. Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Lesion Detection in Microwave Breast Imaging Clinical Data. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Sani, L.; Ghavami, N.; Vispa, A.; Paoli, M.; Raspa, G.; Ghavami, M.; Sacchetti, F.; Vannini, E.; Ercolani, S.; Saracini, A.; et al. Novel microwave apparatus for breast lesions detection: Preliminary clinical results. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2019, 52, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Song, H.; Sasada, S.; Masumoto, N.; Kadoya, T.; Okada, M.; Arihiro, K.; Xiao, X.; Kikkawa, T. A Two-Stage Rotational Surface Clutter Suppression Method for Microwave Breast Imaging with Multistatic Impulse-Radar Detector. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 9586–9598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vispa, A.; Sani, L.; Paoli, M.; Bigotti, A.; Raspa, G.; Ghavami, N.; Caschera, S.; Ghavami, M.; Duranti, M.; Tiberi, G. UWB Device for Breast Microwave Imaging: Phantom and Clinical Validations. Measurement 2019, 146, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Norouzzadeh, E.; Chamaani, S.; Moll, J.; Kexel, C.; Nguyen, D.H.; Hübner, F.; Bazrafshan, B.; Vogl, T.J.; Krozer, V. Numerical and experimental analysis of a transmission-based breast imaging system: A study of application to patients. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2020, 12, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Noghanian, S. Microwave tomography for biomedical quantitative imaging. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2012, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Mojabi, P.; LoVetri, J. Microwave biomedical imaging using the multiplicative regularized gauss–newton inversion. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2009, 8, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Abubakar, A.; Van den Berg, P.M.; Mallorqui, J.J. Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2002, 50, 1761–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Baran, A.; Kurrant, D.J.; Zakaria, A.; Fear, E.C.; LoVetri, J. Breast imaging using microwave tomography with radar-based tissue-regions estimation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2014, 149, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Shea, J.D.; Van Veen, B.D.; Hagness, S.C. A TSVD analysis of microwave inverse scattering for breast imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Elahi, M.A.; Lavoie, B.; Porter, E.; Olavini, M.; Jones, E.; Fear, E.; O’Halloran, M. Comparison of radar-based microwave imaging algorithms applied to experimental breast phantoms. In Proceedings of the 2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS), Montreal, QC, Canada, 19–26 August 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  113. Sagheer, M.; Sami, H.; Riaz, K.; Qasim Mehmood, M.; Zubair, M. Performance Comparison of Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening. In Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Microwave, Antennas Circuits (ICMAC), Islamabad, Pakistan, 21–22 December 2021; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Elahi, M.A.; O’Loughlin, D.; Lavoie, B.R.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E.; Fear, E.C.; O’Halloran, M. Evaluation of Image Reconstruction Algorithms for Confocal Microwave Imaging: Application to Patient Data. Sensors 2018, 18, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Smith, N.B.; Webb, A. Introduction to Medical Imaging: Physics, Engineering and Clinical Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  116. Chang, D.C.; Fang, L.D.; Fang, W.H.; Lee, C.H. Tradeoff study of microwave imaging for biomedical application. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), Singapore, 9–11 December 2013; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  117. Kaye, C.; Gilmore, C.; LoVetri, J. Enhanced Detection of Magnetic Nanoparticles using a Novel Microwave Ferromagnetic Resonance Imaging System. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ambrosanio, M.; Franceschini, S.; Pascazio, V.; Baselice, F. Microwave Breast Imaging via Neural Networks for Almost Real-time Applications. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.12522. [Google Scholar]
  119. Khoshdel, V.; Asefi, M.; Ashraf, A.; LoVetri, J. Full 3D microwave breast imaging using a deep-learning technique. J. Imaging 2020, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Edwards, K.; Khoshdel, V.; Asefi, M.; LoVetri, J.; Gilmore, C.; Jeffrey, I. A Machine Learning Workflow for Tumour Detection in Breasts Using 3D Microwave Imaging. Electronics 2021, 10, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jeremic, A. Detection of Breast Cancer Using Microwave Imaging and Machine Learning-finite Element Method Inverse Models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Photonics Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS), Hangzhou, China, 21–25 November 2021; pp. 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Benny, R.; Anjit, T.A.; Mythili, P. An overview of microwave imaging for breast tumor detection. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 2020, 87, 61–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; Shukla, P.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.; Khalily, M.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Antenna Mutual Coupling Suppression Over Wideband Using Embedded Periphery Slot for Antenna Arrays. Electronics 2018, 7, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Gilmore, C.; Mojabi, P.; Zakaria, A.; Ostadrahimi, M.; Kaye, C.; Noghanian, S.; Shafai, L.; Pistorius, S.; LoVetri, J. A wideband microwave tomography system with a novel frequency selection procedure. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hanadaa, E.; Kudoub, T. Electromagnetic noise in the clinical environment. Polar 2009, 500, 97-4. [Google Scholar]
  126. Abdollahi, N.; Kurrant, D.; Mojabi, P.; Omer, M.; Fear, E.; LoVetri, J. Incorporation of Ultrasonic Prior Information for Improving Quantitative Microwave Imaging of Breast. IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphys. Comput. Tech. 2019, 4, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mojabi, P.; Khoshdel, V.; Lovetri, J. Tissue-Type Classification With Uncertainty Quantification of Microwave and Ultrasound Breast Imaging: A Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 182092–182104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Adachi, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Fujioka, T.; Mori, M.; Kubota, K.; Oda, G.; Kikkawa, T. Feasibility of Portable Microwave Imaging Device for Breast Cancer Detection. Diagnostics 2021, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. de Jesus Aragão, A.; Sanches, B.; de Carvalho, D.; Van Noije, W.A. Low-cost portable system prototype for breast cancer detection using UWB signals. In Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Chengdu, China, 17–19 October 2020; pp. 715–720. [Google Scholar]
  130. Saied, I.; Arslan, T.; Ullah, R.; Liu, C.; Wang, F. Hardware Accelerator for Wearable and Portable Radar-based Microwave Breast Imaging Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Daegu, Korea, 22–28 May 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  131. Sasada, S.; Masumoto, N.; Song, H.; Kajitani, K.; Emi, A.; Kadoya, T.; Arihiro, K.; Kikkawa, T.; Okada, M. Portable impulse-radar detector for breast cancer: A pilot study. J. Med. Imaging 2018, 5, 025502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nath, D. Simulation of a portable microwave breast cancer detection system and derivation of a mathematical model for the relative electromagnetic fields. Master Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  133. Meo, S.D.; Bonello, J.; Lodi, M.B.; Farhat, I.; Farrugia, L.; Fanti, A.; Pasian, M.; Desogus, F.; Sammut, C.V. On the dielectric/thermal characterization and calibration of solutions and materials for biomedical applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–20 March 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Citations of publications on the use of MWI in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Figure 1. Citations of publications on the use of MWI in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Jimaging 08 00123 g001
Figure 2. Methods of microwave breast imaging. The figures on the left show (a) passive versus (b) active approaches. The figures on the right show patient’s orientations for (c) planar systems (supine position) versus (d) cylindrical systems (prone position).
Figure 2. Methods of microwave breast imaging. The figures on the left show (a) passive versus (b) active approaches. The figures on the right show patient’s orientations for (c) planar systems (supine position) versus (d) cylindrical systems (prone position).
Jimaging 08 00123 g002
Figure 3. Citations of publications on the use of MWT in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Figure 3. Citations of publications on the use of MWT in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Jimaging 08 00123 g003
Figure 4. (a) MWT multi-frequency prototype; (b) typical phantom experiment with liquid containers suspended from above the tank and integrated with an alignment fixture for accurate positioning. Reprinted with permission from [38].
Figure 4. (a) MWT multi-frequency prototype; (b) typical phantom experiment with liquid containers suspended from above the tank and integrated with an alignment fixture for accurate positioning. Reprinted with permission from [38].
Jimaging 08 00123 g004
Figure 5. Citations of publications on the use of radar-based MWI in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Figure 5. Citations of publications on the use of radar-based MWI in breast cancer screening applications from the Web of Science databases. Citations are presented: (a) per year; (b) per discipline.
Jimaging 08 00123 g005
Figure 6. UWB radar for breast cancer detection setup developed by the University of Bristol team. Reprinted with permission from [46].
Figure 6. UWB radar for breast cancer detection setup developed by the University of Bristol team. Reprinted with permission from [46].
Jimaging 08 00123 g006
Table 1. Dielectric properties of female breast tissue at 3.2 GHz (adapted from Campbell and Land [24]).
Table 1. Dielectric properties of female breast tissue at 3.2 GHz (adapted from Campbell and Land [24]).
Tissue TypeRelative PermittivityConductivity (mS/cm)Water Content (%)
Fatty tissue2.8–7.60.5–2.911–31
Normal tissue9.8–463.7–3441–76
Benign tissue15–677–4962–84
Malignant tissue9–592–3466–79
Table 2. Chronological summary of relevant studies for dielectric properties of breast tissues.
Table 2. Chronological summary of relevant studies for dielectric properties of breast tissues.
Study (Year)Measurement Technique (Temperature °C)Number of SamplesFrequency RangeTissue TypeFindings
Chaudhary et al. [22] (1984)RX-meter and TDS probe: Samples collected in physiological saline and are in inserted into RX-meter chamber or pressed against using TDS probe (25 °C).153 MHz–3 GHzhealthy and malignant tissues.- Malignant tissue displayed 3–5 times increase in electrical properties compared to healthy tissue.
- The greatest permittivity difference occurred at frequencies less than 100 MHz.
Surowiec et al. [23] (1988)Open-ended coaxial capacitive sensor: Samples inserted into a holder (37 °C).720 kHz–100 MHzhealthy and malignant tissues.- Central region of tumor and surrounding tissue yielded higher dielectric values than peripheral tissue.
Campbell and Land [24] (1992)Resonant cavity perturbation method: Samples inserted into holder (unspecified).373.2 GHzhealthy, malignant, and benign tissues.- Cancerous tissue showed higher dielectric properties.
- Difference in dielectric properties between benign and malignant tumors not sufficient to differentiate between them.
Joines et al. [25] (1994)Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe (24 °C).1250–900 MHzhealthy and malignant tissues.- An average difference in permittivity and conductivity of 233% and 577%, respectively, was observed between healthy and cancerous tissues.
Meaney et al. [29] (2000)Radiating monopole antenna array submerged in saline bath surrounding the breast (25 °C).5900 MHzhealthy tissue.- Average permittivity values at 900 MHz were significantly higher than those reported by Joines et al. [25].
- A correlation was established between fat content and the average permittivity values.
Choi et al. [26] (2004)Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe (unspecified).120.5–30 GHzhealthy and malignant tissues extracted from lymph nodes.- Significant contract in dielectric properties between healthy and malignant lymph nodes’ tissues.
Lazebnik et al. [27,28] (2007)Open-ended coaxial probe: Samples pressed against using probe. (18–25.70 °C in University of Wisconsin) (19.5–26.60 °C in University of Calgary).354, from 93 patients [27] and 196 patients [28]0.5–20 GHzhealthy and malignant tissues extracted from adipose, fibro connective and glandular regions of the breast.- Dielectric properties of breast tissues are primarily determined by the adipose content.
- The location from which the healthy tissue sample is taken affects the comparison.
- Significant contrast, 10:1, in dielectric properties between healthy and malignant tissues.
Martellosio et al. [30] (2017)Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (25 °C).2200.5–50 GHzhealthy and malignant tissue- Dielectric properties of normal tissues showed wider variability than the tumorous tissues.
- Performance comparable to that of mammography performed in vivo on patients.
- Tumorous tissues had higher real and imaginary parts of the complex permittivity than normal breast tissues.
Meo et al. [31] (2017)Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (25 °C).1240.5–50 GHzhealthy and malignant tissue- The results for sensitivity were 90% both for real and imaginary part, while those for specificity were 75%.
Meo et al. [32] (2018)Reflectometry. Open-ended coaxial probe and VNA (−40–220 °C).3460.5–50 GHzhealthy and malignant tissue- Higher variability in dielectric properties of healthy tissues compared to malignant ones.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AlSawaftah, N.; El-Abed, S.; Dhou, S.; Zakaria, A. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Imaging 2022, 8, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123

AMA Style

AlSawaftah N, El-Abed S, Dhou S, Zakaria A. Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging. 2022; 8(5):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123

Chicago/Turabian Style

AlSawaftah, Nour, Salma El-Abed, Salam Dhou, and Amer Zakaria. 2022. "Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions" Journal of Imaging 8, no. 5: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123

APA Style

AlSawaftah, N., El-Abed, S., Dhou, S., & Zakaria, A. (2022). Microwave Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Imaging, 8(5), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop