Next Article in Journal
Recent Progress and Perspectives of Solid State Na-CO2 Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Strain Compensation Methods for Fiber Bragg Grating Temperature Sensors Suitable for Integration into Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolyte
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melamine-Sacrificed Pyrolytic Synthesis of Spiderweb-like Nanocages Encapsulated with Catalytic Co Atoms as Cathode for Advanced Li-S Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

High-Performance Metal–Chalcogen Batteries

School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Batteries 2023, 9(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010035
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Performance Metal-Chalcogen Batteries)
The rapid proliferation in the market for smart devices, electric vehicles, and power grids over the past decade has substantially increased the demand for commercial lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) [1]. However, the development of next-generation secondary batteries has become increasingly urgent due to the high cost and potential geopolitical resource issues of lithium, low capacity, and safety concerns [2].
Metal–chalcogen batteries (MCBs, where M = Li, Na, K, Mg, Ca, Zn, Al, etc.; C = S, Se, and Te) have attracted considerable attention because of their affordability, environment friendliness, and the high theoretical capacities of chalcogen cathodes, as well as the high theoretical capacities of metal anodes [3,4]. Different from the ion-insertion electrochemistry of LIBs, MCBs realize high specific capacities based on reversible redox reactions between chalcogen elements and metal ions [5]. Therefore, high-performance MCBs with chalcogen as the cathode and a metal as the anode have wide-ranging application prospects. According to the different types of electrolytes, MCBs can be divided into organic electrolyte-based systems and aqueous electrolyte-based systems.
For organic electrolyte-based systems, MCBs achieve much higher capacity than LIBs through multistep redox reactions. However, these multistep reactions are complex multiphase and multielectron reactions, accompanied by the formation of a series of electrolyte-soluble intermediate products (polysulfides, polyselenides, and polytellurides) on the cathode side [6]. Such reaction mechanisms trigger the infamous shuttle effect, resulting in capacity attenuation, low rate performance, and low Coulombic efficiency (CE) [7]. The volume changes of chalcogen cathodes during the charging and discharging process result in the proliferation of structure destruction of the cathodes, which seriously affects the battery performance [8]. On the anode side, severe dendrite issues caused by uneven deposition of metal ions may result in short circuits and thermal runaway [9]. Moreover, safety hazards remain due to the toxicity and flammability of organic electrolytes. In the previous decades, tremendous efforts have been attempted to resolve the above problems, but there is still a considerable way to go before the commercialization of MCBs.
For aqueous electrolyte-based systems, MCBs address safety concerns because they employ water-based electrolytes that are flame-retardant, nontoxic, inexpensive, and highly ion-conductive [10]. Therefore, aqueous MCBs possess greater application potential in wearable electronics and large-scale power storage that require higher safety. Most aqueous MCBs are based on solid–solid conversion reaction mechanisms, in which the charge/discharge products are insoluble in aqueous electrolytes, thus suppressing the shuttle effect caused by soluble intermediates in organic electrolytes [11]. However, the solid–solid conversion mechanisms in aqueous electrolytes slow the kinetics of the redox reactions. In addition, the disproportionation reactions and volume changes of chalcogen cathodes during the charging and discharging process also affect the battery performance [12]. On the anode side, the hydrogen evolution, corrosion, passivation, and dendrite growth may lead to further deteriorated electrochemical performance [13]. In the past decade, several efforts have been made to address these challenging problems. It is worth noting that the research on aqueous MCBs is still in the initial stage compared with the organic systems, so further comprehensive and in-depth research on aqueous systems is required.
This Special Issue, entitled “High-Performance Metal-Chalcogen Batteries”, has in view to present the current status of MCBs, propose strategies to solve the aforementioned problems, explore the internal mechanism of ameliorating the performance of MCBs, and ultimately provide a direction to guide the further application and development of MCBs. Potential topics include, but are not limited to:
  • High-performance metal-chalcogen batteries;
  • Chalcogen cathodes;
  • Metal anodes;
  • Electrolytes;
  • Separators;
  • New materials;
  • Advanced characterizations;
  • Machine learning;
  • Theoretical calculations;
  • Mechanism studies;
  • Full batteries.
This Special Issue invites original research articles, review articles, as well as short communications on the research of MCBs. We firmly believe that the findings of this Special Issue will greatly contribute to providing comprehensive guidelines for researchers and promote the development of MCBs.

Acknowledgments

I am pleased to be invited as the guest editor of this Special Issue, entitled “High-Performance Metal-Chalcogen Batteries”, and thank all the authors for their contributions, all the reviewers for their comments, and the editorial team of Batteries for their help and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.; Pan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, P.; Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Lu, H. Designing vertical channels with expanded interlayers for Li-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 4258–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duffner, F.; Kronemeyer, N.; Tübke, J.; Leker, J.; Winter, M.; Schmuch, R. Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Du, Y.; Ma, S.; Dai, J.; Lin, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, T.; Gu, X. Biomass Carbon Materials Contribute Better Alkali-Metal–Selenium Batteries: A Mini-Review. Batteries 2022, 8, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, L.; Hou, Y. Comprehensive Analyses of Aqueous Zn Metal Batteries: Characterization Methods, Simulations, and Theoretical Calculations. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, R.; Ma, T.; Cheng, M.; Tao, X.; Yang, Z.; Ran, F.; Li, S.; Yin, B.; Cheng, C.; Yang, W. Metal–Organic-Framework-Derived Nanostructures as Multifaceted Electrodes in Metal–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2008784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhou, G.; Chen, H.; Cui, Y. Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, L.; Wei, Z.; Wan, C.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, D.; Baumann, D.; Liu, H.; Allen, C.S.; Xu, X.; et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, H.; Jamil, S.; Tang, W.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Bao, S.; Liu, Y.; Xu, M. Melamine-Sacrificed Pyrolytic Synthesis of Spiderweb-like Nanocages Encapsulated with Catalytic Co Atoms as Cathode for Advanced Li-S Batteries. Batteries 2022, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, L.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Dong, L.; Su, L.; Xie, J. Integrated Arrays of Micro Resistance Temperature Detectors for Monitoring of the Short-Circuit Point in Lithium Metal Batteries. Batteries 2022, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, R.; Yang, Z.; Li, W.; Chao, D.; Qiao, S.; Zhao, D. Sulfur-Based Aqueous Batteries: Electrochemistry and Strategies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15475–15489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, H.; Shang, Z.; Luo, G.; Jiao, S.; Cao, R.; Chen, Q.; Lu, K. Redox Catalysis Promoted Activation of Sulfur Redox Chemistry for Energy-Dense Flexible Solid-State Zn–S Battery. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 7344–7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, M.; Yan, Z.; Xiao, J.; Xin, W.; Zhang, L.; Peng, H.; Geng, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; et al. Boosting Cathode Activity and Anode Stability of Zn-S Batteries in Aqueous Media Through Cosolvent-Catalyst Synergy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202212666. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, T.; Li, T.; Shi, T.; Li, W.; Shen, T.; Huang, X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Eliminating Dendrites and Side Reactions via a Multifunctional ZnSe Protective Layer toward Advanced Aqueous Zn Metal Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L. High-Performance Metal–Chalcogen Batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010035

AMA Style

Zhang L. High-Performance Metal–Chalcogen Batteries. Batteries. 2023; 9(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Long. 2023. "High-Performance Metal–Chalcogen Batteries" Batteries 9, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop