Next Article in Journal
Looking Deeper into the Galaxy (Note 7)
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Comparison of Rechargeable Batteries for Stationary Applications (Ni/MH vs. Ni–Cd and VRLA)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Towards Li-Ion Batteries Operating at 80 °C: Ionic Liquid versus Conventional Liquid Electrolytes

1
Department of Chemistry—Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 538, Uppsala SE-75121, Sweden
2
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg SE-41296, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Batteries 2018, 4(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4010002
Submission received: 19 October 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 24 November 2017 / Published: 2 January 2018

Abstract

:
Li-ion battery (LIB) full cells comprised of TiO2-nanotube (TiO2-nt) and LiFePO4 (LFP) electrodes and either a conventional organic solvent based liquid electrolyte or an ionic liquid based electrolyte have been cycled at 80 °C. While the cell containing the ionic liquid based electrolyte exhibited good capacity retention and rate capability during 100 cycles, rapid capacity fading was found for the corresponding cell with the organic electrolyte. Results obtained for TiO2-nt and LFP half-cells indicate an oxidative degradation of the organic electrolyte at 80 °C. In all, ionic liquid based electrolytes can be used to significantly improve the performance of LIBs operating at 80 °C.

1. Introduction

Due to their high energy and power densities, state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used for portable electronics, as well as for electric and hybrid electric vehicles. The key issues to address to ensure a continuous increase in the use of LIBs for large scale electrical energy storage are safety [1] and sustainability [2]. Since high operating or storage temperatures (i.e., above 50 °C) can give rise to significant fading for most commercial LIBs [3,4], cooling systems are generally required. With LIBs working at elevated temperatures—e.g., between 80 and 100 °C—the thermal management in a hybrid electric vehicle could be significantly simplified by allowing the cooling system for the power electronics to also take care of the cooling of the battery pack, resulting in a significant reduction in the complexity and price [5].
The Li polymer battery employed by Bolloré in Autolib’ vehicles represents an example of a successful battery operating at about 80 °C [6]. However, in the scientific literature the term “high temperature cycling” mainly refers to cycling at temperatures at 60 or 70 °C, with only a few reports of battery cycling at 80 °C or higher [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The majority of these studies have been carried out with organic carbonate based electrolytes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], but ionic liquid (IL) based electrolytes [16,17,18], solid polymer electrolytes [19], and ternary electrolytes (IL + polymer + Li-salt) [20] have also been explored. The extensive work with traditional carbonate electrolytes has aimed at finding suitable electrolyte additives [7], alternative binders [8], and the failure mechanisms for both the negative [9,10] and positive electrodes [11,12,13] as well as full cells [14,15]. Unfortunately, so far there are no promising results for these electrolytes when cycling at temperatures of 80 °C or above.
Work with IL-based electrolytes has, on the other hand, demonstrated promising cycling stabilities for titanium dioxide, TiO2(B), and LiFePO4 (LFP) half-cells at temperatures as high as 120 °C [16,17,18]. The cycling of LIBs at elevated temperatures such as 80 °C is associated with increased risks as the kinetics of any side reaction are enhanced, which could lead to the initiation of heat-generating exothermic reactions and eventually thermal runaway [21]. The safety of LIBs operating at these temperatures can therefore be significantly improved if more stable IL electrolytes were used. Pyrrolidinium (Pyr) based ILs have been shown to have wide electrochemical stability windows [16,22]. Moreover, TiO2 electrodes can be cycled at temperatures as high as 120 °C with an electrolyte composed of 1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium TFSI (Pyr13TFSI) [16]. It should be mentioned that the previous studies [16,17,18] were carried out in half-cell configurations with Li metal as the anode material. The electrochemical performance of ionic liquid electrolytes at elevated temperature should therefore also be investigated in full cell Li-ion batteries.
In the present work, LIB cells containing TiO2 nanotube (TiO2-nt) negative electrodes and LFP positive electrodes are cycled at 80 °C using two different electrolytes: 1 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate (PC), as an example of a conventional organic solvent based electrolyte, and an IL based electrolyte composed of LiTFSI in Pyr13TFSI (i.e., Li0.2Pyr130.8TFSI). TiO2 was chosen as the negative electrode material due to its high redox potential (ca. 1.78 V vs. Li+/Li [23]), which should result in insignificant formation of any solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. In addition, LFP is known to be a safe material with a high thermal stability [24]. The electrochemical behavior of the cells during 100 cycles is investigated and discussed with special focus on the failing mechanism of the cells containing the conventional organic electrolyte.

2. Results and Discussion

The electrochemical performance of the TiO2-nt half-cell containing the organic electrolyte indicated a 10% irreversible capacity loss on the first discharge, and a capacity of about 148 mAh/g after 100 cycles (Figure 1a,b). As the capacity decrease was only 5% between the 2nd and the 100th cycle, it is clear that the main decrease took place between the 1st and the 2nd cycles. The coulombic efficiency for the TiO2-nt half-cell was 88.5% on the first cycle, indicating that not all lithium could be extracted from the TiO2-nt electrode upon charge. As the electrode already contained some lithium prior to the second cycle lithiation, the discharge plateau was situated at a slightly higher potential, i.e., the lithiation overpotential was lower. Nevertheless, the coulombic efficiency increased to 98.7% on the second cycle and subsequently stabilized at 99.7% (Figure 1b). These results indicate that the TiO2-nt electrodes readily can be used at 80 °C.
A continuous capacity decrease was, however, observed during the cycling of the LFP based half-cell (Figure 1c,d). The results also indicate the presence of an irreversible oxidation reaction most likely involving the electrolyte, as the charge capacity always was larger than the discharge capacity (Figure 1c). Since the coulombic efficiency decreased dramatically during the first five cycles, only to slowly increase again upon further cycling, it is reasonable to assume that a layer of electrolyte degradation products was formed on the electrode surface mainly during the first five cycles. This behavior is in stark contrast to that seen for LFP electrodes cycled at room temperature, in which case stable cycling and high coulombic efficiency are typically observed [25]. The continuous capacity loss upon cycling, leading to a capacity loss of 25% after 100 cycles is clearly detrimental to the performance of any full cell and thus conventional organic solvent based electrolytes are less suitable for LIBs operated at 80 °C.
The TiO2-nt and LFP half-cells were also subject to rate capability tests (Figure 2). For the TiO2-nt half-cell, the capacity was found to decrease with increasing rate but there was no significant permanent loss of capacity during the cycling, i.e., the same capacity was obtained when the rate was decreased to C/5 again. This behavior can therefore be explained by the increased iR drop at higher cycling rates. The corresponding results for the LFP half-cell (Figure 2b), on the other hand, features a significant capacity decrease upon cycling irrespective of the cycling rate employed which is in good agreement with the poor cycling stability (Figure 1c,d).
Cycling of full cells containing a TiO2-nt negative electrode and a LFP positive electrode using the two different electrolytes was also carried out (Figure 3). During 100 cycles, there was almost no capacity fading for the cell containing the IL based electrolyte (Figure 3a), while a significant loss of capacity was obtained for the cell containing the organic electrolyte (insert). This clearly shows that the IL based electrolyte is more stable towards oxidation compared to the conventional organic electrolyte. The capacity obtained at a rate of 2C was about 65% of that found at a rate of C/5 (~110 mAh/g) (Figure 3b). In analogy with the results for the TiO2-nt half-cell this suggests a loss of capacity at the higher rates mainly due to iR drop effects.

3. Materials and Methods

The TiO2-nt electrodes were fabricated using a previously described two-step anodization process [26]. The first anodization step was carried out by stepping the potential from 0 to 60 V after which this potential was maintained for around four hours. The obtained nanotube layer was then removed by strong sonication in deionized water (DI) for 20 min to expose the underlying titanium substrate. The second anodization was then performed on this textured substrate for 90 min using the same experimental conditions, after which the sample was rinsed in DI and dried in a flow of nitrogen. The TiO2-nt electrodes were subsequently thermally annealed in air at 350 °C for five hours. The LFP electrodes were obtained by casting a slurry containing 75 wt % LiFePO4 (Phostech, P2), 15 wt % PVdF (Solvay, Solef 5130), and 10 wt % conductive carbon (Timcal, Super C 65) on aluminum foil. All electrodes were dried in vacuum at 120 °C for 12 h prior to use in the LIB cells.
The organic carbonate based electrolyte was made by dissolving LiTFSI (99.95%) in PC (BASF, >99.8%) to a concentration of 1 M. The IL electrolyte was prepared by mixing LiTFSI with Pyr13TFSI (99%) to yield a mole fraction of 0.2 i.e., Li0.2Pyr130.8TFSI.
The LIB full cells contained a TiO2-nt negative electrode separated from the LFP positive electrode by a glass fiber separator impregnated with the selected electrolyte, all vacuum sealed in a polymer coated aluminum pouch cell. The half-cells consisted of a TiO2-nt or LFP working electrode and a lithium foil serving as a combined counter and reference electrode, separated by a glass fiber separator impregnated with the organic electrolyte. All cells were galvanostatically tested at 80 °C using a Digatron BTS600 galvanostat and the TiO2-nt half-cells were cycled between 1.5 and 2.1 V vs. Li+/Li° whereas the LFP half-cells were cycled between 2.7 and 3.8 V vs. Li+/Li°. The TiO2-nt–LFP full-cells were cycled between 1.4 and 2.1 V.

4. Conclusions

The electrochemical cycling performance of cells composed of TiO2-nt negative electrodes and LFP positive electrodes at 80 °C critically depends on the choice of the electrolyte. While cells containing a Li0.2Pyr130.8TFSI ionic liquid electrolyte could be cycled without significant loss of capacity for 100 cycles at 80 °C, significant capacity decays were found with a conventional organic liquid electrolyte. The latter was attributed to an oxidative degradation of the organic electrolyte, yielding low coulombic efficiencies. The excellent performance of the ionic liquid based full cells seen for rates up to 2C provide new possibilities for the development of safe, stable, and sustainable LIBs for use at elevated temperatures in, e.g., hybrid electric heavy vehicles.

Acknowledgments

“High Temperature Lithium-ion Batteries” is a project funded by the Swedish Energy Agency via “Batterifonden” and the collaboration between Chalmers University of Technology, Lund University, Uppsala University, and Scania CV AB was created within the Swedish Electromobility Center (SHC). The Swedish Strategic Research Foundation and the project “Road to Load” (a collaboration between Uppsala University and Chalmers University of Technology) are also acknowledged.

Author Contributions

G.O., K.E., L.N., P.J., and T.G. conceived and designed the experiments. G.O., N.P., and C.I. executed the experiments. C.I. and P.J. provided the ionic liquid. C.I. and W.W. provided the TiO2-nt electrodes. G.O., T.G., L.N., C.I., and W.W. were involved in the analysis of the results. G.O. and C.X. wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in the discussion of the results and manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalhoff, J.; Eshetu, G.G.; Bresser, D.; Passerini, S. Safer Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives. ChemSuschem 2015, 8, 2154–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Larcher, D.; Tarascon, J.-M. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bloom, I.; Cole, B.W.; Sohn, J.J.; Jones, S.A.; Polzin, E.G.; Battaglia, V.S.; Henriksen, G.L.; Motloch, C.; Richardson, R.; Unkelhaeuser, T.; et al. An accelerated calendar and cycle life study of Li-ion cells. J. Power Sources 2001, 101, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vetter, J.; Novák, P.; Wagner, M.; Veit, C.; Möller, K.-C.; Besenhard, J.; Winter, M.; Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M.; Vogler, C.; Hammouche, A. Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2005, 147, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tidblad, A.; Svens, A.P. Energirelaterad Fordonsforskning 2017. Available online: https://www.energimyndigheten.se/globalassets/forskning--innovation/konferenser/energirelaterad-fordonsforskning/program-energirelaterad-fordonsforskning-2017.pdf (accessed on 29 December 2017).
  6. Vervaeke, M.; Calabrese, G. Prospective design in the automotive sector and the trajectory of the Bluecar project: An electric car sharing system. Int. J. Veh. Des. 2015, 68, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smart, M.C.; Ratnakumar, B.V.; Gozdz, A.S.; Mani, S. The Effect of Electrolyte Additives upon the Lithium Kinetics of Li-Ion Cells Containing MCMB and LiNixCo1−xO2 Electrodes and Exposed to High Temperatures. ECS Trans. 2010, 25, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morishita, M.; Mukai, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Yanagida, M.; Sakai, T. Improvement of Cycling Stability at 80 °C for 4 V-Class Lithium-Ion Batteries and Safety Evaluation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, A1311–A1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andersson, A.M.; Edström, K. Chemical composition and morphology of the elevated temperature SEI on Graphite. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A1100–A1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Markevich, E.; Pollak, E.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. On the performance of graphitized meso carbon microbeads (MCMB)–meso carbon fibers (MCF) and synthetic graphite electrodes at elevated temperatures. J. Power Sources 2007, 174, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muto, S.; Sasano, Y.; Tatsumi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Horibuchi, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ukyo, Y. Capacity-fading mechanisms of LiNiO2-based lithium-ion batteries II. Diagnostic analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2009, 156, A371–A377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Y.-K. Structural degradation mechanism of oxysulfide spinel LiAl0.24Mn1.76O3.98S0.02 cathode materials on high temperature cycling. Electrochem. Commun. 2001, 3, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yabuuchi, N.; Ohzuku, T. Electrochemical behaviors of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 in lithium batteries at elevated temperatures. J. Power Sources 2005, 146, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bodenes, L.; Dedryvère, R.; Martinez, H.; Fischer, F.; Tessier, C.; Pérès, J.-P. Lithium-ion batteries working at 85 °C: Aging phenomena and electrode/electrolyte interfaces studied by XPS. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A1739–A1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bodenes, L.; Naturel, R.; Martinez, H.; Dedryvère, R.; Menetrier, M.; Croguennec, L.; Pérès, J.-P.; Tessier, C.; Fischer, F. Lithium secondary batteries working at very high temperature: Capacity fade and understanding of aging mechanisms. J. Power Sources 2013, 236, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mun, J.; Jung, Y.S.; Yim, T.; Lee, H.Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, Y.G.; Oh, S.M. Electrochemical stability of bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide-based ionic liquids at elevated temperature as a solvent for a titanium oxide bronze electrode. J. Power Sources 2009, 194, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsumoto, H.; Kubota, K. The High Temperature Operation of Lithium Secondary Batteries with Using Ionic Liquids. ECS Trans. 2014, 64, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Plylahan, N.; Kerner, M.; Lim, D.-H.; Matic, A.; Johansson, P. Ionic liquid and hybrid ionic liquid/organic electrolytes for high temperature lithium-ion battery application. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 216, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, Q.; Osswald, S.; Daniel, R.; Zhu, Y.; Wesel, S.; Ortiz, L.; Sadoway, D.R. Graft copolymer-based lithium-ion battery for high-temperature operation. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 5604–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wetjen, M.; Kim, G.-T.; Joost, M.; Winter, M.; Passerini, S. Temperature dependence of electrochemical properties of cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide)–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide solid polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 87, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bandhauer, T.M.; Garimella, S.; Fuller, T.F. A Critical Review of Thermal Issues in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, R1–R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. MacFarlane, D.R.; Meakin, P.; Sun, J.; Amini, N.; Forsyth, M. Pyrrolidinium imides: A new family of molten salts and conductive plastic crystal phases. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4164–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ohzuku, T.; Ohzuku, T. Electrochemistry of anatase titanium dioxide in lithium nonaqueous cells. J. Power Sources 1985, 14, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Sun, X. Olivine LiFePO4: The remaining challenges for future energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1110–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Delacourt, C.; Poizot, P.; Levasseur, S.; Masquelier, C. Size effects on carbon-free LiFePO4 powders the key to superior energy density. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2006, 9, A352–A355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, W.; Oltean, G.; Tai, C.-W.; Edström, K.; Björefors, F.; Nyholm, L. High energy and power density TiO2 nanotube electrodes for 3D Li-ion microbatteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 8160–8169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Charge and discharge curves (a,c), and the capacity and coulombic efficiency as a function of the cycle number (b,d) for a TiO2-nt half-cell (a,b) and a LFP half-cell (c,d). The rate was C/5 at 80 °C using a 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Figure 1. Charge and discharge curves (a,c), and the capacity and coulombic efficiency as a function of the cycle number (b,d) for a TiO2-nt half-cell (a,b) and a LFP half-cell (c,d). The rate was C/5 at 80 °C using a 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Batteries 04 00002 g001
Figure 2. Rate capabilities for the TiO2-nt (a) and LFP (b) based half-cells at 80 °C using a 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Figure 2. Rate capabilities for the TiO2-nt (a) and LFP (b) based half-cells at 80 °C using a 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Batteries 04 00002 g002
Figure 3. The C/5 capacity as a function of the cycle number (a) and the rate capability (b) obtained at 80 °C for a full cell containing a TiO2-nt negative electrode, a LFP positive electrode, and a Li0.2Pyr130.8TFSI electrolyte. The inset in (a) shows the corresponding full cell data obtained for the 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Figure 3. The C/5 capacity as a function of the cycle number (a) and the rate capability (b) obtained at 80 °C for a full cell containing a TiO2-nt negative electrode, a LFP positive electrode, and a Li0.2Pyr130.8TFSI electrolyte. The inset in (a) shows the corresponding full cell data obtained for the 1 M LiTFSI in PC electrolyte.
Batteries 04 00002 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oltean, G.; Plylahan, N.; Ihrfors, C.; Wei, W.; Xu, C.; Edström, K.; Nyholm, L.; Johansson, P.; Gustafsson, T. Towards Li-Ion Batteries Operating at 80 °C: Ionic Liquid versus Conventional Liquid Electrolytes. Batteries 2018, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4010002

AMA Style

Oltean G, Plylahan N, Ihrfors C, Wei W, Xu C, Edström K, Nyholm L, Johansson P, Gustafsson T. Towards Li-Ion Batteries Operating at 80 °C: Ionic Liquid versus Conventional Liquid Electrolytes. Batteries. 2018; 4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oltean, Gabriel, Nareerat Plylahan, Charlotte Ihrfors, Wei Wei, Chao Xu, Kristina Edström, Leif Nyholm, Patrik Johansson, and Torbjörn Gustafsson. 2018. "Towards Li-Ion Batteries Operating at 80 °C: Ionic Liquid versus Conventional Liquid Electrolytes" Batteries 4, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4010002

APA Style

Oltean, G., Plylahan, N., Ihrfors, C., Wei, W., Xu, C., Edström, K., Nyholm, L., Johansson, P., & Gustafsson, T. (2018). Towards Li-Ion Batteries Operating at 80 °C: Ionic Liquid versus Conventional Liquid Electrolytes. Batteries, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop