Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Water Scarcity
3. Climate Change Impacts on Water for Agriculture
4. Mitigation of Water Scarcity through Hydrogel
5. Characteristics of Superabsorbent Polymers
- 1.
- Size: Microhydrogels and bulk hydrogels are distinct types of hydrogels that can be distinguished by their size. Microhydrogels comprise individual hydrogels that are much smaller than those found in bulk hydrogels. Current research on microhydrogels has concentrated on the nanoscale size since it is well suited to catalysis, magnetism, optics, electricity, and mechanics due to the surface and quantum effects provided by their small size and large specific surface area. On the other hand, bulk hydrogels comprise larger hydrogels with specific sizes and shapes commonly used in food processing and beauty salons. They often take the form of a low-strength jelly that has a particular viscosity and fluidity that be used for antimicrobial coatings, tissue engineering, coatings on inert biosensors, and food processing, depending on their thicknesses and strengths. Although the material has a wide range of applications and good qualities, the moulding and processing of this low-strength and soft watery material remains difficult, and its uses in some specialized industries are limited. Therefore, efforts have been made to improve the strength of bulk hydrogels by introducing a reinforcing phase into the matrix. This provides the hydrogel with new chemical and physical properties, which has improved the strength of bulk hydrogels.
- 2.
- Environmental response: Hydrogels can be categorised as either environmentally unresponsive hydrogels (also known as ordinary hydrogels) or environmentally responsive hydrogels (intelligent hydrogels) based on how well they react to their surrounding environment. Environmentally insensitive hydrogels can maintain their structure as well as their physical and chemical properties under various environmental conditions [35]. For certain specialized applications, this particular type of hydrogel is required. For example, agarose is hydrophilic and biodegradable but almost entirely lacks charged group structures. Thus, this hydrogel is resistant to being desaturated or adsorbed by sensitive biomacromolecules, so it is frequently used as a support matrix in gelation or immunoelectrophoresis experiments. On the other hand, hydrogels that reversibly respond to external stimuli are referred to as intelligent, smart, or environmentally sensitive hydrogels. When a hydrogel is subjected to environmental stimuli such as a magnetic field, stress, light, temperature, electric field, ion strength, pH, etc., the three-dimensional network structure of the hydrogel either changes (shrinking or swelling) or transitions between the dilute phase and the dense phase. As a result, the shape, optical properties, and mechanical properties of the hydrogel are dramatically altered. As soon as the external stimulus is removed, the hydrogel will revert to its original state, which has a lower internal steady-state energy.
- 3.
- Degradability: Hydrogels can be classified as non-biodegradable or biodegradable. Non-biodegradable hydrogels are distinguished by their resistance to the effects of environmental stimuli and their ability to preserve their chemical, physical, and structural properties over an extended period. The vast majority of synthetic hydrogels produced by chemical crosslinking are non-biodegradable. In contrast, the vast majority of natural polymer hydrogels can be classified as biodegradable hydrogels. The three-dimensional structure of these hydrogels is susceptible to degradation due to the actions of enzymes and bacteria when exposed to natural environments. The bonds present both within the molecular chains and between the molecular chains is severed, which results in a decrease in the hydrogel’s overall strength. In due time, the hydrogel will break down into smaller molecules.
- 4.
- Mechanism formation: Physical hydrogels and chemical hydrogels can be differentiated from one another according to the formation method of the three-dimensional network structure. Physical hydrogels are primarily three-dimensional networks formed by secondary bonds, also known as noncovalent bonds (such as hydrophobic interaction, chain entanglement, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interaction), between linear molecules to form physical crosslinking joints. Since only a moderate amount of energy is required to disrupt these interactions [36], the sol-gel transformation that occurs in physical hydrogels is typically reversible. No chemical reactions are involved in their creation, and the conditions under which they are prepared are generally mild, so they are well suited to biomedical use [36]. On the other hand, chemical hydrogels are produced by irreversible molecular crosslinking that occurs during their formation. Chemical hydrogels often offer good mechanical properties, tunable structures, and stable properties.
- 5.
- Source: Hydrogels can be divided into two main categories based on their material source: natural and synthetic. Synthetic hydrogels are crosslinked polymers developed in an artificial environment using ring-opening or addition reaction polymerization processes. Synthetic hydrogels are often made with skeletons consisting of polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylic acid and its derivatives, and polyethylene glycol and its copolymers as the primary building blocks. Compared to natural polymer hydrogels, synthetic hydrogels have poor biodegradability, bioactivity, and biocompatibility; however, the advantage of synthetic hydrogels include precisely controlled properties, easy chemical modification, and industrial production. Natural polymers, such as cyclodextrin, dextran, chitosan, agarose, sodium alginate, fibrin, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, and collagen, are derived from natural sources and have excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility. Due to their abundance and sensitivity to the surrounding environment, they have emerged as the leading research focus. In general, when choosing a hydrogel as a soil conditioner, three aspects need to be taken into consideration: (1) chemical crosslinking; (2) biodegradability; and (3) superabsorbency [35].
6. Mechanism of Swelling and Water Retention for Hydrogels as Soil Conditioners
7. Application of Hydrogels in Agriculture
7.1. Hydrogel as a “Nano Release” and “Smart Release” Fertilizer
7.2. Polysaccharide Hydrogels as Agents for Controlling Plant Diseases
7.3. Seed Coating with Hydrogel
7.4. Mode of Action for Polysaccharide Hydrogels on Microorganisms and Plant Roots
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Samuel, C.; Fatai, A.; Magaji, U.; Kareem, I.; Kolapo, K. Drought resistance in rice from conventional to molecular breeding: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Calcagnile, P.; Sibillano, T.; Giannini, C.; Sannino, A.; Demitri, C. Biodegradable poly (lactic acid)/cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogel composite material as water and fertilizer reservoir in agricultural applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreye, C.; Bouman, B.A.M.; Castaneda, A.R.; Lampayan, R.M.; Faronilo, J.E.; Lactaoen, A.T.; Fernandez, L. Possible causes of yield failure in tropical aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 2009, 111, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, E.M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ghobashy, M.M. The application of natural polymer-based hydrogels for agriculture. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 329–356. [Google Scholar]
- Neethu, T.M.; Dubey, P.K.; Kaswala, A.R. Prospects and applications of hydrogel technology in agriculture. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018, 7, 3155–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammar, N.E.B.; Barbouche, M.; Hamzaoui, A.H. Historical view of hydrogel characterization. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 459–479. [Google Scholar]
- Mali, K.K.; Dhawale, S.C.; Dias, R.J.; Dhane, N.S.; Ghorpade, V.S. Citric acid crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose-based composite hydrogel films for drug delivery. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 80, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godwin, P.M.; Pan, Y.; Xiao, H.; Afzal, M.T. Progress in preparation and application of modified biochar for improving heavy metal ion removal from wastewater. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2019, 4, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannazza, G.; Cataldo, A.; de Benedetto, E.; Demitri, C.; Madaghiele, M.; Sannino, A. Experimental assessment of the use of a novel superabsorbent polymer (SAP) for the optimization of Water consumption in agricultural irrigation process. Water. 2014, 6, 2056–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nnadi, F.; Brave, C. Environmentally friendly superabsorbent polymers for water conservation in agricultural lands. J. Soil Sci. Environ. 2011, 2, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
- Abobatta, W. Impact of hydrogel polymer in agricultural sector. Adv. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2018, 1, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sannino, A.; Demitri, C.; Madaghiele, M. Biodegradable cellulose-based hydrogels: Design and applications. Materials 2009, 2, 353–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demitri, C.; Del Sole, R.; Scalera, F.; Sannino, A.; Vasapollo, G.; Maffezzoli, A.; Nicolais, L. Novel superabsorbent cellulose-based hydrogels crosslinked with citric acid. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 2453–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molden, D. (Ed.) Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture; Earthscan: London, UK; Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Rosegrant, M.W.; Ringler, C.; Zhu, T. Water for agriculture: Maintaining food security under growing scarcity. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulser, T.B.; Ringler, C.; Zhu, T.; Msangi, S.; Bryan, E.; Rosegrant, M. Green and blue water accounting in the Ganges and Nile basins: Implications for food and agricultural policy. J Hydrol. 2010, 384, 276–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rockstrom, J.; Lannerstad, M.; Falkenmark, M. Assessing the water challenge of a new green revolution in developing countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6253–6260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nhemachena, C.; Nhamo, L.; Matchaya, G.; Nhemachena, C.R.; Muchara, B.; Karuaihe, S.T.; Mpandeli, S. Climate change impacts on water and agriculture sectors in Southern Africa: Threats and opportunities for sustainable development. Water 2020, 12, 2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO (Food Agric. Organ. UN). World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Interim Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Stocker, T. (Ed.) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Field, C.B.; Barros, V.R.; Dokken, D.J.; Mach, K.J.; Mastrandrea, M.D. (Eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Mata, L.J.; Arnell, N.W.; Doll, P.; Kabat, P.; Jimenez, B.; Shiklomanov, I. Freshwater resources and their management. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.Working Group II Contribution to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 173–210. [Google Scholar]
- Bates, B.; Kundzewicz, Z.; Wu, S. Climate Change and Water; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; p. 210. [Google Scholar]
- Arnell, N.W. Climate change and global water resources. Glob. Environ. Change. 1999, 9, S31–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Skrzypczak, D.; Jarzembowski, Ł.; Izydorczyk, G.; Mikula, K.; Hoppe, V.; Mielko, K.A.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Hydrogel Alginate Seed Coating as an Innovative Method for Delivering Nutrients at the Early Stages of Plant Growth. Polymers 2021, 13, 4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragab, R.; Prudhomme, C. Climate change and water resources management in arid and semi-arid regions: Prospective and challenges for the 21st century. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81, 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El-Aziz, G.H.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Fahmy, A.H. Using Environmentally Friendly Hydrogels to Alleviate the Negative Impact of Drought on Plant. Open J. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.X.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Z.G.; Fang, R.C.; Liu, M.J. Design and Synthesis of Bioinspired Multiscale Hydrogels: From Interface to Three-dimensional Network. Acta Polym. Sin. 2018, 9, 1155–1174. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.; Han, Q.; Chen, B.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, K.; Li, Q.; Wang, J. Antimicrobial hydrogels: Promising materials for medical application. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ciolacu, D.E.; Suflet, D.M. Cellulose-based hydrogels for medical/pharmaceutical applications. In Biomass as Renewable Raw Material to Obtain Bioproducts of High-Tech Value; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 401–439. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, N.; Youssef, G. Dynamic properties of hydrogels and fiber-reinforced hydrogels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 85, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, N.; Dumont, M.J. Protein-based hydrogels derived from industrial by-products containing collagen, keratin, zein and soy. Waste Biomass Valori. 2017, 8, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y. Properties and development of hydrogels. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- De Kruif, C.K.; Anema, S.G.; Zhu, C.; Havea, P.; Coker, C. Water holding capacity and swelling of casein hydrogels. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 44, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, B.; Basak, B.B.; Sarkar, S.; Mandal, S. Adaptive Soil Management: From Theory to Practices; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Wang, A. Synthesis, swelling behaviors, and slow-release characteristics of a guar gum-g-poly (sodium acrylate)/sodium humate superabsorbent. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2102–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koupai, A.J.; Asadkazemi, J. Effects of a hydrophilic polymer on the field performance of an ornamental plant (Cupressus arizonica) under reduced irrigation regimes. Iran. Polym. J. 2006, 15, 715–722. [Google Scholar]
- Akhter, J.; Mahmood, K.; Malik, K.A. Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, Y.G.; Yang, P.L.; Luo, Y.P. Porosity change model for watered super absorbent polymer-treated soil. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El-Rehim, H.A. Characterization and possible agricultural application of polyacrylamide/sodium alginate crosslinked hydrogels prepared by ionizing radiation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 3572–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekebafe, L.O.; Ogbeifun, D.E.; Okieimen, F.E. Polymer applications in agriculture. Biokemistri 2011, 23, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lenka, S.; Lenka, N.K.; Singh, A.B.; Singh, B.; Raghuwanshi, J. Global warming potential and greenhouse gas emission under different soil nutrient management practices in soybean-wheat system of central India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 4603–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malla, G.; Bhatia, A.; Pathak, H.; Prasad, S.; Jain, N.; Singh, J. Mitigating nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil in rice_wheat system of the Indo-Gangetic plain with nitrification and urease inhibitors. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bley, H.; Gianello, C.; Santos, L.D.; Selau, L.P.R. Nutrient release, plant nutrition, and potassium leaching from polymer-coated fertilizer. Rev. Bras. Cienc. 2017, 41, e0160142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suriyaprabha, R.; Karunakaran, G.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Prabu, P.; Rajendran, V.; Kannan, N. Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1294–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, H.X.; Sun, C.J.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, J.; Gu, W. Applications of nanotechnology in agrochemical formulation, perspectives, challenges and strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Nanoagri, Sao Pedro, Brazil, 20–25 June 2010; pp. 28–33. [Google Scholar]
- Corradini, E.; De Moura, M.R.; Mattoso, L.H.C. A preliminary study of the incorparation of NPK fertilizer into chitosan nanoparticles. Express Polym. Lett. 2010, 4, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, D.; Hussain, H.; Yi, Z.; Siegele, R.; Cresswell, T.; Kong, L. Uptake and cellular distribution, in four plant species, of fluorescently labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 1389–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondeau-Mouro, C.; Defer, D.; Leboeuf, E.; Lahaye, M. Assessment of cell wall porosity in Arabidopsis thaliana by NMR spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008, 42, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, E.; Baun, A.; Behra, R.; Hartmann, N.B.; Filser, J.; Miao, A.J. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17, 372–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khodakovskaya, M.; Dervishi, E.; Mahmood, M.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Watanbe, F. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano. 2009, 3, 3221–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colvin, V.L. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bortolin, A.; Aouada, F.A.; Mattoso, L.H.; Ribeiro, C. Nanocomposite PAAm/methyl cellulose/montmorillonite hydrogel: Evidence of synergistic effects for the slow release of fertilizers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7431–7439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, W.A.N.G.; Jing-Jing, L.I.; Hong-liang, W.E.I.; Gang, W.A.N.G.; Hui-Juan, C.H.U.; Jing, Z.H.U. Applied research progress of hydrogels in slow/controlled fertilizer. J. Light Ind. 2017, 32, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, C.; Lu, S.; Gao, C.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Bai, X. “Smart” fertilizer with temperature- and pH responsive behavior via surface-initiated polymerization for controlled release of nutrients, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 3157–33166. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, C.; Frantz, J.; Bugbee, B. Macro-and micronutrient-release characteristics of three polymer-coated fertilizers: Theory and measurements. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meurer, R.A.; Kemper, S.; Knopp, S.; Eichert, T.; Jakob, F.; Goldbach, H.E. Biofunctional microgelbased fertilizers for controlled foliar delivery of nutrients to plants, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7380–7386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oertli, J.J.; Lunt, O.R. Controlled release of fertilizer minerals by incapsulating membranes: I. Factors influencing the rate of release. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1962, 26, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedrini, S.; Merritt, D.J.; Stevens, J.; Dixon, K. Seed Coating: Science or Marketing Spin? Trends Plant. Sci. 2017, 22, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Green, J.M.; Beestman, G.B. Recently patented and commercialized formulation and adjuvant technology. Crop Protec. 2007, 26, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brockwell, J. Studies on seed pelleting as an aid to legume seed inoculation. I. Coating materials, adhesives, and methods of inoculation. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1962, 13, 638–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koch, R.; Burkness, E.; Hutchison, W.; Rabaey, T. Efficacy of systemic insecticide seed treatments for protection of early-growthstage snap beans from bean leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) foliar feeding. Crop. Prot. 2005, 24, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nel, L. The Role of Seed Coating in the Establishment and Growth of Medicago sativa L. Cultivars. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2013; p. 156. [Google Scholar]
- Ismail, H.; Irani, M.; Ahmad, Z. Starch-based hydrogels: Present status and applications. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2013, 62, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravier, I.; Haouisee, E.; Clément, M.; Seux, R.; Briand, O. Field experiments for the evaluation of pesticide spray-drift on arable crops. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2005, 61, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chevillard, A.; Angellier-Coussy, H.; Guillard, V.; Gontard, N.; Gastaldi, E. Controlling pesticide release via structuring agropolymer and nanoclays based materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 205–206, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elshafie, H.S.; Nuzzaci, M.; Logozzo, G.; Gioia, T.; Camele, I. Biological investigations on the role of hydrogel formulations containing bioactive natural agents against some common phytopathogens of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and seed germination. J. Biol. Res. 2020, 3, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, B.; Sharma, D.; Gupta, A. In vitro release dynamics of thiram fungicide from starch and poly(methacrylic acid)-based hydrogels. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mercier, L.; Lafitte, C.; Borderies, G.; Briand, X.; Esquerre’-Tugaye’, M.T.; Fournier, J. The algal polysaccharide carrageenans can act as an elicitor of plant defence. New Phytol. 2001, 149, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katiyar, D.; Hemantaranjan, A.; Singh, B. Chitosan as a promising natural compound to enhance potential physiological responses in plant: A review. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, L.A.; Joyce, D.C. Elicitors of induced disease resistance in postharvest horticultural crops: A brief review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pospieszny, H. Antiviroid activity of chitosan. Crop Prot. 1997, 16, 105–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, G.; Yang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, M.; Kennedy, J.F.; Nie, J. Preparation and characterization of watersoluble N alkylated chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 74, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhary, R.C.; Kumaraswamy, R.V.; Kumari, S.; Sharma, S.S.; Pal, A.; Raliya, R. Cu-chitosan nanoparticle boost defense responses and plant growth in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarrocco, S.; Raeta, R.; Vannacci, G. Seeds encapsulation in calcium alginate pellets. Seed Sci. Technol. 2004, 32, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi Riseh, R.; Skorik, Y.A.; Thakur, V.K.; Moradi Pour, M.; Tamanadar, E.; Noghabi, S.S. Encapsulation of plant biocontrol bacteria with alginate as a main polymer material. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, A.M. Influence of Hydrogel Type and Concentration, and Water Application Rate on some Hydraulic Properties of a Sandy Soil. Alex. Sci. Exch. J. 2019, 40, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehsanfar, S.; Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M. Crop protection by seed coating. Commun. Agric. Appl. Boil. Sci. 2005, 70, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
- Halmer, P. Method to improve seed performance in the field. In Handbook of Seed Physiology-Applications to Agriculture; Benech-Arnold, R.L., Sanchez, R.A., Eds.; The Haworth Reference Press: Binghamton, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Gherardi, M.J.; Rengel, Z. Genotypes of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) show differential tolerance to manganese deficiency and toxicity when grown in bauxite residue sand. Plant. Soil. 2003, 249, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, N.; Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Christie, P.; Zhang, Y. Phenanthrene uptake by Medicago sativa L. under the influence of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M. Pre-sowing seed treatment-a shotgun approach to improve germination; plant growth; and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv. Agron. 2005, 88, 223–271. [Google Scholar]
- Su, L.-Q.; Li, J.-G.; Xue, H.; Wang, X.-F. Super absorbent polymer seed coatings promote seed germination and seedling growth of Caragana korshinskii in drought. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2017, 18, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pathak, V.; Ambrose, K.R.P. Starch-based biodegradable hydrogel as seed coating for corn to improve early growth under water shortage. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isabel, J.B.; Devi, P.R.; Balamurugan, A.; Hemananthan, E.; Kumar, V.S.; Suriya, S.B. Encapsulation of Pseudomonas Fluorescens for a Slow Release Biofertilizer. ICAMIB-2019; Sathyabama University: Chennai, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Dungait, J.A.; Hopkins, D.W.; Gregory, A.S.; Whitmore, A.P. Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob. Change Biol. 2012, 18, 1781–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenland, D.J.; Oades, J.M. Saccharides, Soil Components; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1975; pp. 213–261. [Google Scholar]
- Wallace, A.; Garn, A.W. Effects of soil conditioners on emergence and growth of tomato, cotton, and lettuce seedlings. Soil Sci. 1986, 141, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standing, D.; Killham, K. The Soil Environment, Modern Soil Microbiology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2006; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien, A.T. Supporting soil fungi to rebuild soils in agriculture. Philos. Act. Nat. 2013, 10, 24–35. [Google Scholar]
- Salyers, A.A.; West, S.E.; Vercellotti, J.R.; Wilkins, T.D. Fermentation of mucins and plant polysaccharides by anaerobic bacteria from the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 34, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Islam, K.R. Lecture on Soil Physics, Personal Collection of K. Islam; The Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources: Columbus, OH, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Pattanaaik, S.K.; Singh, B.; Wangchu, L.; Debnath, P.; Hazarika, B.N.; Pandey, A.K. Effect of hydrogel on water and nutrient management of Citrus limon. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res. 2015, 3, 1656–1659. [Google Scholar]
- Pieve, L.M.; Guimares, R.J.; Assis, G.A.; Amato, G.A.S.; Correa, J.M. Use of water retention polymers during implementation of coffee plantations. Coffee Sci. 2013, 8, 314–323. [Google Scholar]
- Karimi, A.; Noshadi, M.; Ahmadzadeh, M. Effects of super absorbent polymer (igeta) on crop, soil water and irrigation interval. JWSS Isfahan Univ. Technol. 2009, 12, 403–414. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Arolu, F.; Chukwu, S.C.; Salisu, M.A.; Fagbohun, I.K.; Muftaudeen, T.K.; Swaray, S.; Haliru, B.S. Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070605
Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Arolu F, Chukwu SC, Salisu MA, Fagbohun IK, Muftaudeen TK, Swaray S, Haliru BS. Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(7):605. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070605
Chicago/Turabian StyleOladosu, Yusuff, Mohd Y. Rafii, Fatai Arolu, Samuel Chibuike Chukwu, Monsuru Adekunle Salisu, Ifeoluwa Kayode Fagbohun, Taoheed Kolawole Muftaudeen, Senesie Swaray, and Bello Sani Haliru. 2022. "Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review" Horticulturae 8, no. 7: 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070605
APA StyleOladosu, Y., Rafii, M. Y., Arolu, F., Chukwu, S. C., Salisu, M. A., Fagbohun, I. K., Muftaudeen, T. K., Swaray, S., & Haliru, B. S. (2022). Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Horticulturae, 8(7), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070605