Next Article in Journal
Soil, Water and Nitrates Management in Horticultural Production
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Callus and Cell Suspension Cultures of Lycium schweinfurthii for Improved Production of Phenolics, Flavonoids, and Antioxidant Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Essential Oils in Citrus Fruit Ripening and Postharvest Quality

by
Maria Michela Salvatore
1,2,
Rosario Nicoletti
3,4,* and
Anna Andolfi
1,5
1
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, 80055 Portici, Italy
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
4
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Center for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 81100 Caserta, Italy
5
BAT Center—Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(5), 396; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050396
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 30 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Changes in Cell Properties during Fruit Ripening)

Abstract

:
Citrus essential oils (EOs) are widely used as flavoring agents in food, pharmaceutical, cosmetical and chemical industries. For this reason, their demand is constantly increasing all over the world. Besides industrial applications, the abundance of EOs in the epicarp is particularly relevant for the quality of citrus fruit. In fact, these compounds represent a natural protection against postharvest deteriorations due to their remarkable antimicrobial, insecticidal and antioxidant activities. Several factors, including genotype, climatic conditions and cultural practices, can influence the assortment and accumulation of EOs in citrus peels. This review is focused on factors influencing variation of the EOs’ composition during ripening and on the implications on postharvest quality of the fruit.

1. Introduction

The genus Citrus (Rutaceae, Aurantioideae) includes four basic taxa and several hybrid species which are mainly cultivated in subtropical regions [1]. All Citrus species are characterized by a particular kind of berry fruit, the hesperidium, of which the epicarp is scattered with cavities lined with secretory cells producing essential oils (EOs). Besides conferring the typical scent, these mixtures possess a series of notable biological properties which contribute to the fruit quality and represent an added value for these crops in view of several possible applications in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetical and chemical industries [2].
One of the most important applications is based on the antimicrobial properties of EOs, which have been recognized for a long time and recently boosted by the urgent need for alternatives to chemical bactericides following the spread of antibiotic resistance. Generally recognized as safe, these compounds possess inhibitory properties against a wide range of microorganisms, both as direct oil and in vapor form; undoubtedly, they represent a group of natural antimicrobials which may fulfil health and technical requirements for both the consumers and the food industry [3].

2. Essential Oils of Citrus Fruits

According to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “essential oil” is defined as a “product obtained from a natural raw material of plant origin, by steam distillation, by mechanical processes from the epicarp of citrus fruit or by dry distillation, after separation of the aqueous phase—if any—by physical processes” [4].
Essential oils are composed of lipophilic and highly volatile secondary metabolites, with a molecular weight below 300 Da, that can be physically separated from other plant components [5].
In citrus, essential oils could be extracted from leaf, flower, epicarp and fruit juice representing more than 80% of the volatile fraction, mainly constituted of terpenoids, phenylpropanoids and short-chain aliphatic hydrocarbon derivatives [6]. Terpenoids are the predominant EO constituents; they are characterized by a wide structural diversity deriving from C5 isoprene units and are classified as hemiterpenes (C5), monoterpenes (C10), sesquiterpenes (C15), diterpenes (C20), sesterterpenes (C25), triterpenes (C30) and tetraterpenes (C40) [7]. The monoterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpenes comprising alcohols, aldehydes, ketones and esters, are responsible for the odor and flavor profiles of fruit. Despite the dominance of the monoterpene hydrocarbon limonene in the citrus EO composition, other less abundant monoterpenes actively contribute to the citrus aroma, representing major determinants of fruit quality.
EO composition is known to vary among the several Citrus species, according to both the genetic bases and a series of environmental factors which are examined in the next section. Compounds characterizing EOs are listed in Table 1, based on data gathered from recent literature concerning the most common citrus species, such as: key lime (C. aurantifolia) [8,9], bitter orange (C. aurantium) [10,11,12], bergamot (C. bergamia) [13,14,15], pomelo (C. maxima or C. grandis) [16,17], kaffir lime (C. hystrix) [18], persian lime (C. latifolia) [8], sweet lemon (C. limetta) [19,20], lemon (C. limon) [8,11,21], rangpur (C. limonia) [8], wild orange (C. macroptera) [16], citron (C. medica) [22,23], grapefruit (C. paradisi) [17], mandarin orange (C. reticulata) [11,24,25,26], sweet orange (C. sinensis) [11,27], hyuganatsu (C. tamurana) [28,29] and satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu) [30].

3. Main Changes in the Essential Oils Content during Fruit Maturation

The fruit quality attributes (e.g., juice color, flavor, seed presence, shape, peel color, presence of alterations) have strong economical relevance because they are related to the consumer perception. It is known that the general nutritional properties vary remarkably during the fruit ripening stages and harvesting time as a result of variation in nature and concentration of organic acids, sugars and phenolics which largely affect taste and organoleptic quality [31]. Among these compounds, EOs have attracted attention due to their high content in peels, aroma, flavors and bioactive properties. Although different citrus species share many EOs (Table 1), each fruit has a distinctive odor that is related to the presence or absence of unique components, which significantly influence the organoleptic properties and, as a consequence, the market destination of the fruit [32].
Besides the genetic bases concerning species (Table 1) and cultivars [33], preharvest climatic conditions and cultural practices (e.g., rootstocks, irrigation, crop management following conventional or organic farming), harvesting time and methods represent crucial factors that affect the chemical composition of EOs. In this respect, it has been observed that the rootstock may influence the yield and composition of peel EOs in orange, with a low impact on flavor. Generally, neither the rootstock nor the scion ploidy levels affect the EOs content; however, the tetraploid level of the scion may significantly reduce the oxygenated compound fraction. Sensitive significant differences were detected between the reference sample (diploid scion–diploid rootstock) and the three other diploid-tetraploid combinations, suggesting that the rootstock and the ploidy level of the scion are key elements for the profiling of aromatic flavor [27].
In general, the fruit growth and development in citrus consists of three stages: a first phase of slow growth, a second phase of major increase in size and weight by growth of juice sacs from the pulp and a third phase of reduced fruit growth together with fruit transformation and maturation [34]. The decision on harvesting time is critical in defining the quality of the fruits.
In order to maximize the quality of citrus fruit in terms of EO production, studies have been conducted to investigate the evolution of the main products at the different stages of ripening [11,35,36,37,38,39,40], observing significant variation essentially in monoterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpenes.
An investigation on variation during ripening of the chemical composition of the peel of four citrus (i.e., C. aurantium, C. limon, C. sinensis, C. reticulata) revealed that it depends on the stage and the species. In fact, the stage of maximum yield of EOs production is the immaturity for C. limon, the semimaturity for C. sinensis and C. reticulata and the maturity for C. aurantium. However, in all these species the highest level of limonene was already reached at the immature stage [11]. Subsequently, Bhuyan et al. [38] confirmed that in C. reticulata the maximum yield of peel oil is reached at the turning (semimature) stage, with lower specific gravity, refractive index and ester number, and a higher content in aldehydes and other organoleptically important oxygenated constituents; particularly, these products contribute to the overall quality and typical aroma of mandarin oil, making it more suitable for commercial applications.
An Italian study also demonstrated that variation of peel EOs during fruit ripening depends on the origin and cultivars. In fact, the measurement of EO content of four cultivars of C. limon at different harvesting times (i.e., October, November, December, February) showed that the maximum yield was reached in November for Campanian cultivars (i.e., ‘Ovale di Sorrento’ and ‘Sfusato Amalfitano’), whereas in Sicilian cultivars (i.e., ‘Femminello Cerza’ and ‘Femminello Adamo’) the peak was reached in December. Furthermore, the most abundant monoterpene hydrocarbons (e.g., α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, d-limonene, and γ-terpinene) decreased during the ripening stages [36].
The EO yield was also determined for C. medica peels, observing a marked increase during fruit development and maturation. The content of some components, particularly limonene, α-thujene, 3-carene, α-pinene, β-pinene and γ-terpinene, varied significantly during maturation stages [35].
Investigating the effect of harvesting time on the volatile compounds produced by C. bergamia is particularly important considering that bergamot fruits are primarily used for the extraction of EOs employed in perfumes, cosmetics and confections. Marzocchi et al. [37] conducted a study aimed to assess the EO quality of two varieties of C. bergamia at different maturation stages, observing that the volatile compound concentration is higher at the second and the third stage. Particularly, the maturation stage seemed to affect many compounds (e.g., β-pinene, γ-terpinene, α-terpineol), while limonene, the most representative compound, had similar concentrations in all varieties regardless of the harvesting time.

4. Biological Properties as Related to Protection against Postharvest Deterioration

Many substances contribute to the biological properties of citrus fruits, such as carotenoids [41], flavonoids [42], ascorbic and other organic acids [31]. However, in consequence of the possibility of extracting them from the peels as by-products, bioactivities of EOs have been considered more in-depth, and independently studied. Besides usage in cosmetology [43], these properties have been essentially investigated with reference to multiple favorable effects on health and ensuing pharmaceutical relevance. This refers to possible applications in the treatment of neurological [44] and vascular disorders [45], and as antioxidant [12,46,47,48,49,50], anticholesterolemic [51], antidiabetic [12] and antitumor agents [43,52]. The latter effects have been also studied with reference to purified products, such as citral [53,54], bergamottin and 5-geranyloxy-7-methoxycoumarin [13].
However, the most exploited applications undoubtedly rely on antimicrobial properties (Table 2). These concern use of EOs not only as alternative antibiotics in the medical field [12,55,56,57,58,59,60], but particularly as food additives. The latter usage, that may also involve EOs extracted from other plants which are not considered in this article, aims at improving the quality of a wide array of food products with reference to both possible contamination with human pathogens and preservation of organoleptic properties after inhibition of deteriorating microbial agents [47,50,56,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Of course, the latter is a priority aspect in the case of citrus fruits, which generally need to overcome prolonged postharvest periods before undergoing either fresh consumption or industrial transformation. Hence, to a certain extent citrus fruits benefit from a natural protection against postharvest deterioration from the EOs which abound in their epicarp (Table 2).
Postharvest quality of citrus fruits is affected by several fungal pathogens which start the infection process in the field, such as Phytophthora citrophthora, Alternaria citri, Diaporthe citri and Lasiodiplodia theobromae [98,99,100]. In the case of the tropical citrus spot agent Pseudocercospora (=Phaeoramularia) angolensis, tolerance by certain species/cultivars has been referred to the composition of peel EOs [70]. Several practical applications have dealt with the heterologous use of citrus EOs against biological adversities of other crops [89,92,101]; many examples concern pests and pathogens which are also known on citrus fruits, hence representing indirect evidence of possible effectiveness in their management on the latter. This is the case of reported effects against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the agent of citrus anthracnose also known as Glomerella cingulata, which damages fruits both in the field and in postharvest [71,72,88,96,102]. Inhibitory effects have also been documented against other fungi, such as Aspergillus spp. [55,63,78,82,85,93,94,95,97,101,103,104], which may affect citrus quality as mycotoxin producers [105,106]. The gray mold agent Botrytis cinerea, also recently affirmed as an emergent citrus postharvest pathogen [107], proved to be sensitive to lemon essential oil, which completely inhibits in vitro growth at concentrations of 17 μL mL−1 [83], or 0.016% [108]. However, lower inhibitory activities resulted from two other studies carried out with EOs of C. limon, C. limonia. C. aurantifolia and C. latifolia (MIC 312–625 μg mL−1) [8], and of C. aurantifolia, C. limon, C. paradisi and C. sinensis (EC50 ranging between 249 and 809 mg L−1) [67], with the latter also showing mild antibacterial effects. Inhibitory properties against the agent of bacterial canker Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri were displayed by EOs extracted from C. aurantium [76], from C. aurantifolia and C. aurantium [68] and from C. reticulata, C. limon, C. sinensis and C. aurantium [47].
Undisputedly, a major impact on citrus fruit quality has to be ascribed to the agents of blue mold (Penicillium italicum) and green mold (Penicillium digitatum) [109]. EOs from orange (cvv. ‘Washington Navel’, ‘Sanguinello’, ‘Tarocco’, ‘Moro’, ‘Valencia late’ and ‘Ovale’), bitter orange, mandarin (cv. ‘Avana’), grapefruit (cvv. ‘Marsh seedless’ and ‘Red Blush’) and lemon (cv. ‘Femminello’, collected in three periods) displayed to various extents inhibitory activities against these fungi, with P. digitatum being more sensitive [69]. Moreover, treatments with lime EOs at 10% concentration reduced disease severity on orange fruit, along with significant reduction of the undesirable fruit percentage and weight loss, and increase in total soluble solid content during cold storage for 14 weeks [73]. Young green lemon fruit show a significantly lower level of postharvest decay as compared to the older yellow fruit. Inoculation with P. digitatum demonstrated that resistance of green fruit is related to compounds synthesized in the oil glands of the flavedo, the majority of which are identified as the monoterpene aldehyde citral. Flavedo of green lemons contains 1.5–2-times higher levels of citral than the yellow fruit. In parallel with citral decline, flavedo extracts of yellow lemons exhibited an increased level of the monoterpene ester neryl acetate, which not only proved to be inactive but, in concentrations below 500 ppm, even stimulated development of P. digitatum. During long-term storage, citral concentration decreases in parallel with the decline of antifungal activity in the peel and with an increase of decay incidence [110]. Citral was recently found to affect ergosterol biosynthesis, indicating general antifungal effects [111]. In fact, along with its isomers geranial and neral, it also displayed various amounts of inhibitory effects against P. italicum and Geotrichum candidum [112,113,114], as well as α-terpineol [115].
Other purified EOs have shown inhibitory effects against P. digitatum. Citronellal inhibited mycelial growth and spore germination in a dose-dependent manner, with a MIC of 1.60 µL mL−1 and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of 3.20 µL mL−1 [116]. When assayed as encapsulated oil-in water nanoemulsions, eugenol, carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde displayed antifungal effects in a dose-dependent manner with MIC of 0.125 mg mL−1 and MFC of 0.25 mg mL−1. Nanoemulsion coating reduced fruit decay, weight loss and respiratory rate; degradation of soluble solids, vitamin C and titratable acids were delayed, while antioxidant enzyme activities were significantly increased and maintained during postharvest storage [117]. Moreover, R-(l)-carvone completely inhibited mycelial growth at a concentration of 1000 μL L−1 and caused approximately 60% inhibition at 500 μL L−1, while 1,8-cineole was effective at 3000 μL L−1, but inhibition decreased to 83% at 2000 μL L−1; (d)-limonene was ineffective against this pathogen with only 50% inhibition achieved at 3000 μL L−1 [118]. Otherwise, limonene has been reported for general fungistatic properties as assayed on a panel of five test fungi; however, lower fungitoxicity than the crude extract is indicative of synergistic action by other EO components [92,104]. The compound also showed direct anti-aflatoxigenic properties [85]. Thymol and carvacrol exhibited strong antifungal activity against B. cinerea, with MIC and MFC of 65 mg L−1 and 100 mg L−1 for thymol, and 120 μL L−1 and 140 μL L−1 for carvacrol [119]. In another study (d)-β-pinene, (l)-α-pinene, (l)-β-pinene, (d)-limonene and (l)-limonene displayed some inhibitory effects against the gray mold agent [8]. Citral presented MIC of 0.5% on A. niger, A. flavus and Fusarium sp., 2.0% on Penicillium sp. and 8.0% on Rhizopus sp., while eugenol presented MIC of 2.0% on A. flavus and 4.0% on Penicillium sp., Fusarium sp. and Rhizopus sp. [82]. Some of these products, such as D-limonene, have also displayed insecticidal and acaricidal properties [9,120], which can result in a protective effect against insect pests both in the field and in postharvest handling.
Some typical EO constituents, such as thymol, eugenol and geraniol, have been recently assayed as nanoemulsions, displaying bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects against the citrus pathogens Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii and X. citri subsp. citri [121]. Inhibitory effects against the latter were also documented for α-terpineol, citral, citronellal, geraniol, linalyl acetate and linalool [68]. Particularly, the latter compound has been shown to mediate resistance against bacterial canker in mandarin [122] and in transgenic sweet orange [123].
As a counterpoint to the above favorable effects, another study pointed out that EOs of C. limon, C. limonia, C. aurantifolia and C. latifolia enhance P. digitatum in vitro, and that growth of the fungus was even stimulated by pure chiral volatile compounds from these EOs, apart from citral and (+)-β-pinene [8]. Likewise, EOs of mandarin stimulated spore germination and mycelium growth of P. digitatum and P. italicum at a low concentration, but they were strongly inhibitory at a higher concentration [124]. This hormetic effect has been also displayed by selected compounds of EOs, such as citral and linalool [125]. Indeed, some evidence has been gathered that compounds in the EOs may act as odor cues for attracting pest or inducing citrus plant pathogens. In fact, both P. digitatum and X. citri subsp. citri were unable to infect the peel tissues of transgenic orange fruits with downregulation of limonene synthase and reduced accumulation of limonene in the peel [126].
Contrasting results have also been obtained with reference to effects against the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata). In fact, EOs are generally considered as the most critical resistance factor to medfly infestation of various citrus fruits. Toxic effects on larvae were reported to be caused by treatments with EOs extracted from some varieties of lemon, sweet and bitter orange. The two latter species, presenting a higher limonene concentration, produced stronger effects, while presence of α-pinene and β-pinene was considered to account for the lower toxicity of lemon EOs [81]. Likewise, ether extracts from lemon and grapefruit peel proved to be toxic to the eggs and larvae of both the medfly and the South American fruit fly (Anastrepha fraterculus), along with purified limonene and citral. There were no or less significant differences in toxicity of extracts from ripe and overripe fruit of both species [33]. As the ovipositional responses of female medflies were investigated in dual-choice experiments, a significantly higher number of eggs was laid into hollow oviposition hemispheres which had been pre-punctured with 1 µL of peel oil from sweet orange, satsuma mandarin, bitter orange, grapefruit and lemon. The latter had just a weak stimulatory effect, while sweet orange oil was the most active in eliciting oviposition. Limonene stimulated oviposition, whereas linalool, a representative compound of immature citrus fruit associated with high toxicity against immature stages of fruit flies, had a significant deterrent effect. In further no-choice tests, females laid about 23% fewer eggs in limonene 93% (that is the amount found in orange oil) and 60% fewer eggs in limonene 93% plus linalool 3% (approximately 10-fold the amount found in orange oil) mixtures, as compared to sweet orange oil. Hence, the limonene content accounts, largely but not completely, for the ovipositional responses observed in sweet orange oil, whereas high linalool proportions are capable of significantly masking and/or disrupting its stimulatory effects [127]. Limonene, linalool and α-pinene induced toxicity to adult medflies, with males being more sensitive than females. Sub-lethal doses of limonene (LD20) enhanced the lifespan of medflies when they were deprived of protein and positively affected fecundity, implying positive effects of sub-lethal doses at least at certain stages; hence, a general hormetic-like response [128]. Detrimental effects on oviposition were observed on linalool-treated bitter oranges. Particularly, oranges that were offered to females immediately after exposure to linalool received more oviposition stings and eggs than those offered three days post-exposure. More flies were captured in traps placed on untreated-control than on linalool-treated trees. Spraying and topical-droplet application were more efficient than exposure to vapors of linalool in ethanolic solution [129]. Reduction of oviposition was also observed on oranges treated with lemon EOs, with some differences between oils extracted from the the two cultivars ‘Interdonato’ and ‘Lunario’, the first one being more effective at lower dose [130]. Significant improvement was also observed on the mating behavior of medfly males, after exposure to commercial EOs from peels of bitter orange, mandarin orange, lemon and grapefruit; more particularly by doses of 12.5 or 25 μL of sweet orange oil. Moreover, a mixture of geraniol, α-pinene, limonene, β-myrcene and linalool also determined mating advantages. Considering that this mixture did not contain α-copaene, an EO known to enhance mating success, it could find alternative application in view of a more cost-effective and efficient implementation of the sterile insect technique in the integrated management of C. capitata [131]. Among the above compounds, further studies have shown that linalool is particularly relevant in this attractive effect [132].
Matching what was previously reported for citrus pathogens, the general remark that medflies are less attracted by low limonene-expressing fruit indicates that accumulation of this main component of EOs in the peel of citrus fruit is involved in the successful trophic interaction between fruit, insects and microorganisms. Hence, terpene downregulation has been proposed as a strategy to generate broad-spectrum resistance against the pests and pathogens of these crops. However, this issue requires careful thought, considering that limonene is recognized to play a role in citrus defense against other pests, such as scales, whiteflies and mealybugs [133].
The above-mentioned antioxidant properties of EOs, documented in the case of extracts from several citrus species [12,46,47,48,49,50], should also be considered with reference to their preservative action on fruit in postharvest. EOs and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been proposed and routinely used as biofumigants for the treatment of several food commodities, including fruit where postharvest deterioration caused by molds is a general problem affecting trade and storage [134]. Citrus peel extracts are generally recognized as safe products to be used for treatment of commodities, including wheat seeds, where they do not cause adverse effects on germination [93], and in the fresh market of fruit and vegetables as bioactive edible coatings [135]; the latter also in combination with other effective products such as chitosan [98,136,137,138].

5. The Role of Endophytic Fungi

Endophytes are recognized as a key factor impacting plant health. Moreover, by influencing physiology of reproductive organs, they govern the process of fruit ripening, with ensuing effects on quality and preservation during marketing [139]. On the other hand, microbiome components functionally interact with each other in multiple ways, in connection with factors such as the plant genotype, the developmental stages and the environmental conditions [140].
It is generally accepted that many endophytic fungi effectively improve citrus plant fitness by promoting growth and participating in defensive mutualism [141,142]. At least in part, the latter function is due to the capacity of the endophytic strains to release bioactive metabolites. This property is not only referable to peculiar antimicrobial products, but also to several compounds which are originally known as plant secondary metabolites, including some belonging to the EOs [143]. Indeed, the long list of endophytic fungi reported in this reference published in 2015 as able to directly synthesize these compounds should be integrated with an even higher number of findings resulting from the manifold studies carried out throughout the world in the last seven years, attesting the increasing awareness of the importance of this component of biodiversity. Moreover, endophytes have been found to be involved in biotransformation of products in EO fraction, as experimentally demonstrated in the case of Piper aduncum [144]. On the other hand, biosynthesis of EOs by some endophytes may be induced in the presence of plant pathogens. This is the case of a strain of Trichoderma longibrachiatum producing cedrene, epi-β-caryophyllene and nerolidol in co-culture with Fusarium oxysporum [145].
With specific reference to Citrus spp., the ability of strains of Annulohypoxylon sp. from C. aurantifolia to produce 1,8-cineole [146] and of Muscodor sp. from C. sinensis to synthesize cis-, trans-α-bergamotene, cedrene, Z-β-farnesene and other volatile compounds which collectively inhibit the agent of citrus black spot (Phyllosticta citricarpa) [147], confirms the inference that endophytic fungi may effectively support and integrate the pool of products synthesized by the host plant. The relevance of these findings is corroborated by a general biosynthetic aptitude of xylariaceous fungi, which are widespread as endophytes and, besides Muscodor (syn. Induratia) and Annulohypoxylon, include the genera Xylaria, Daldinia and Hypoxylon (syn. Nodulisporium), also reported as EO producers [141].
A practical application derived from basic observations concerning these fungi has been named mycofumigation [148]. It consists of the treatment of food commodities with the volatile fractions of extracts from cultures of fungal strains containing antimicrobial products which act by permeating the surrounding atmosphere during product storage. The importance of this technique in postharvest handling of citrus fruits is intuitive, and one practical experience reported for the endophytic isolate CMU-UPE34 of Nodulisporium sp. is valuable for elucidating the expected impact on the product quality. In fact, this strain was found to effectively inhibit growth of two citrus molds (P. digitatum and Penicillium expansum) by releasing a mixture of 31 VOCs containing eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) and terpinen-4-ol as the most abundant products [149]; these compounds act synergistically, as it has been demonstrated against B. cinerea [150].
Fumigation of oranges with citral (20, 60 or 150 mL L−1 in absorbent pads) in a closed system, following application of conidia by puncturing, delayed the onset of sour rot by G. candidum var. citri-aurantii at room temperature by 7–10 days and at 5 °C, by 13–30 days, but had limited effect on blue and green mold, which developed faster on oranges wounded by puncture than by abrasion. Volatile citral delayed the development of blue mold in abraded, but not punctured, oranges stored at 5 °C. Phytotoxicity symptoms were observed on the upper surface of some fruit close to or in direct contact with citral-soaked pads at concentrations of 60 and 150 mL L−1. Citral residue was not detected in the rind of fumigated oranges. Volatile citral applied at 60 mL L−1 appeared to have potential for the control of sour rot, although phytotoxicity was associated with high concentrations [151].
So far, limited data are available on the biosynthetic capacities of citrus endophytes. Hence, supplementary work must be carried out to verify properties by the most common endophytic species and to assess if they can play a significant role in driving the ripening process and preserving fruit quality both in the grove and in postharvest. Indeed, the direct use of endophytic fungi may represent a more effective tool than the classic treatments with selected chemicals, considering that these microbial associates are capable of continuously releasing a bulk of substances acting in synergism, and that the concomitant presence of multiple bioactive compounds may minimize the risk of induction of resistance in the challenged pathogens.

6. Conclusions

In recent years, citrus essential oils have gained great popularity for applicative usage in the food and cosmetic as well as the pharmaceutical industries, which has been technically refined by the availability of several kinds of microformulations [152]. The increasing demand underlines the opportunity to recycle citrus peels contained in wastes from the food industry for their extraction [80,153,154]. However, the raw material is qualitatively highly heterogeneous as it is influenced by several factors including the nature and provenance of the fruit, genotype, soil type, climatic and cultural conditions. It has been demonstrated that the chemical compositions of the citrus peels vary significantly during ripening. For this reason, harvesting time is a critical parameter, especially because EOs have an important role in the protection from postharvest fruit deteriorations. In fact, EOs in the immature fruit stages have a higher effectiveness against pests and pathogens. This evidence may be adaptatively interpreted with the necessity by the plant to protect developing fruits; while in ripe fruits this need would no longer be relevant, considering that they are destined either to be eaten by frugivorous animals or to fall to the ground to allow seed dispersal [155]. Adaptative factors may also regard the capacity of some endophytic associates to directly synthesize these products, which contribute to shaping their ecological role as defensive mutualists. Undoubtedly, this aptitude deserves more in-depth assessments in view of a possible exploitation for improving postharvest quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.N. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.M.S., R.N. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ghada, B.; Amel, O.; Aymen, M.; Aymen, A.; Amel, S.H. Phylogenetic patterns and molecular evolution among ‘True citrus fruit trees’ group (Rutaceae family and Aurantioideae subfamily). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 253, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhong, G.; Nicolosi, E. Citrus origin, diffusion, and economic importance. In The Citrus Genome; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-3-030-10799-4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher, K.; Phillips, C. Potential antimicrobial uses of essential oils in food: Is citrus the answer? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. BS EN ISO 9235:2021; BSI Standards Publication Aromatic Natural Raw Materials—Vocabulary. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2021.
  5. Malik, S. Essential Oil Research: Trends in Biosynthesis, Analytics, Industrial Applications and Biotechnological Production; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-16545-1. [Google Scholar]
  6. Turek, C.; Stintzing, F.C. Stability of essential oils: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dewick, P.M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosyntheic Approach, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-470-74168-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Simas, D.L.R.; de Amorim, S.H.B.M.; Goulart, F.R.V.; Alviano, C.S.; Alviano, D.S.; da Silva, A.J.R. Citrus species essential oils and their components can inhibit or stimulate fungal growth in fruit. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 98, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pavela, R.; Stepanycheva, E.; Shchenikova, A.; Chermenskaya, T.; Petrova, M. Essential oils as prospective fumigants against Tetranychus urticae Koch. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taghadomi-Saberi, S.; Garcia, S.M.; Masoumi, A.A.; Sadeghi, M.; Marco, S. Classification of bitter orange essential oils according to fruit ripening stage by untargeted chemical profiling and machine learning. Sensors 2018, 18, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bourgou, S.; Rahali, F.Z.; Ourghemmi, I.; Tounsi, M.S. Changes of peel essential oil composition of four tunisian citrus during fruit maturation. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 528593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hajlaoui, H.; Arraouadi, S.; Aouadi, K.; Snoussi, M.; Noumi, E.; Kadri, A. GC-MS profile, α-glucosidase inhibition potential, antibacterial and antioxidant evaluation of peels Citrus aurantium (L.), essential oil. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2021, 33, 1580–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Navarra, M.; Ferlazzo, N.; Cirmi, S.; Trapasso, E.; Bramanti, P.; Lombardo, G.E.; Minciullo, P.L.; Calapai, G.; Gangemi, S. Effects of bergamot essential oil and its extractive fractions on SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell growth. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 1042–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Furneri, P.M.; Mondello, L.; Mandalari, G.; Paolino, D.; Dugo, P.; Garozzo, A.; Bisignano, G. In vitro antimycoplasmal activity of Citrus bergamia essential oil and its major components. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 52, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sawamura, M.; Onishi, Y.; Ikemoto, J.; Tu, N.T.M.; Phi, N.T.L. Characteristic odour components of bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rana, V.S.; Blazquez, M.A. Compositions of the volatile oils of Citrus macroptera and C. maxima. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1371–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Njoroge, S.M.; Koaze, H.; Karanja, P.N.; Sawamura, M. Volatile constituents of redblush grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) and pummelo (Citrus grandis) peel essential oils from Kenya. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9790–9794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Le, X.T.; Ha, P.T.H.; Phong, H.X.; Hien, T.T.; Ngan, T.T.K. Extraction of essential oils and volatile compounds of Kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix D.C) by hydrodistillation method. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 991, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Colecio-Juárez, M.C.; Rubio-Núñez, R.E.; Botello-Álvarez, J.E.; Martínez-González, G.M.; Navarrete-Bolaños, J.L.; Jiménez-Islas, H. Characterization of volatile compounds in the essential oil of sweet lime (Citrus limetta Risso). Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 72, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Maurya, A.K.; Mohanty, S.; Pal, A.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Bawankule, D.U. The essential oil from Citrus limetta Risso peels alleviates skin inflammation: In-vitro and in-vivo study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 212, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paw, M.; Begum, T.; Gogoi, R.; Pandey, S.K.; Lal, M. Chemical composition of Citrus limon L. Burmf peel essential oil from North East India. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants 2020, 23, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Z.H.; Cai, M.; Liu, Y.S.; Sun, P.L.; Luo, S.L. Antibacterial activity and mechanisms of essential oil from Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis. Molecules 2019, 24, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chhikara, N.; Kour, R.; Jaglan, S.; Gupta, P.; Gat, Y.; Panghal, A. Citrus medica: Nutritional, phytochemical composition and health benefits–a review. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 1978–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tao, N.; Jia, L.; Zhou, H. Anti-fungal activity of Citrus reticulata Blanco essential oil against Penicillium italicum and Penicillium digitatum. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chutia, M.; Deka Bhuyan, P.; Pathak, M.G.; Sarma, T.C.; Boruah, P. Antifungal activity and chemical composition of Citrus reticulata Blanco essential oil against phytopathogens from North East India. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 777–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Njoroge, S.M.; Mungai, H.N.; Koaze, H.; Phi, N.T.L.; Sawamura, M. Volatile constituents of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) peel oil from Burundi. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferrer, V.; Paymal, N.; Quinton, C.; Costantino, G.; Paoli, M.; Froelicher, Y.; Ollitrault, P.; Tomi, F.; Luro, F. Influence of the rootstock and the ploidy level of the scion and the rootstock on sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel essential oil yield, composition and aromatic properties. Agriculture 2022, 12, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Choi, H.S.; Sawamura, M. Composition of essential oil of Citrus tamurana Hort. ex Tanaka (Hyuganatsu). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 66, 4868–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Choi, H.S.; Sawamura, M. Effects of storage conditions on the composition of Citrus tamurana hort. ex Tanaka (hyuganatsu) essential oil. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yang, X.N.; Kang, S.C. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of essential oil from Korean Citrus unshiu peel. J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 2013, 2, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bermejo, A.; Cano, A. Analysis of nutritional constituents in twenty citrus cultivars from the Mediterranean area at different stages of ripening. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012, 3, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodríguez, A.; Peris, J.E.; Redondo, A.; Shimada, T.; Costell, E.; Carbonell, I.; Rojas, C.; Peña, L. Impact of D-limonene synthase up- or down-regulation on sweet orange fruit and juice odor perception. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruiz, M.J.; Juárez, M.L.; Alzogaray, R.A.; Arrighi, F.; Arroyo, L.; Gastaminza, G.; Willink, E.; Bardón, A.D.V.; Vera, T. Toxic effect of citrus peel constituents on Anastrepha fraterculus Wiedemann and Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann immature stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10084–10091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lado, J.; Gambetta, G.; Zacarias, L. Key determinants of citrus fruit quality: Metabolites and main changes during maturation. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 233, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Tu, D. Variation in the components and antioxidant activity of Citrus medica L. var. Sarcodactylis essential oils at different stages of maturity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 46, 311–316. [Google Scholar]
  36. Di Rauso Simeone, G.; Di Matteo, A.; Rao, M.A.; Di Vaio, C. Variations of peel essential oils during fruit ripening in four lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. F.) cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marzocchi, S.; Baldi, E.; Crucitti, M.C.; Toselli, M.; Caboni, M.F. Effect of harvesting time on volatile compounds composition of bergamot (Citrus × Bergamia) essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 2019, 34, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bhuyan, N.; Barua, P.C.; Kalita, P.; Saikia, A. Physico-chemical variation in peel oils of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) during ripening. Indian J. Plant. Physiol. 2015, 20, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghani, A.; Mohtashami, S.; Jamalian, S. Peel essential oil content and constituent variations and antioxidant activity of grapefruit (Citrus × paradisi var. red blush) during color change stages. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 4917–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rowshan, V.; Najafian, S. Changes of peel essential oil composition of Citrus aurantium L. during fruit maturation in Iran. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants 2015, 18, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fanciullino, A.L.; Dhuique-Mayer, C.; Luro, F.; Casanova, J.; Morillon, R.; Ollitrault, P. Carotenoid diversity in cultivated citrus is highly influenced by genetic factors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4397–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tripoli, E.; Guardia, M.L.; Giammanco, S.; Di Majo, D.; Giammanco, M. Citrus flavonoids: Molecular structure, biological activity and nutritional properties: A review. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Navarra, M.; Mannucci, C.; Delbò, M.; Calapai, G. Citrus bergamia essential oil: From basic research to clinical application. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Morrone, L.A.; Rombolà, L.; Pelle, C.; Corasaniti, M.T.; Zappettini, S.; Paudice, P.; Bonanno, G.; Bagetta, G. The essential oil of bergamot enhances the levels of amino acid neurotransmitters in the hippocampus of rat: Implication of monoterpene hydrocarbons. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kang, P.; Suh, S.H.; Min, S.S.; Seol, G.H. The essential oil of Citrus bergamia Risso induces vasorelaxation of the mouse aorta by activating K+ channels and inhibiting Ca2+ influx. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Di Vaio, C.; Graziani, G.; Gaspari, A.; Scaglione, G.; Nocerino, S.; Ritieni, A. Essential oils content and antioxidant properties of peel ethanol extract in 18 lemon cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 126, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Frassinetti, S.; Caltavuturo, L.; Cini, M.; Della Croce, C.M.; Maserti, B.E. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of essential oils from Citrus spp. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2011, 23, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marino, A.; Paterniti, I.; Cordaro, M.; Morabito, R.; Campolo, M.; Navarra, M.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S. Role of natural antioxidants and potential use of bergamot in treating rheumatoid arthritis. PharmaNutrition 2015, 3, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lamine, M.; Rahali, F.Z.; Hammami, M.; Mliki, A. Correlative metabolite profiling approach to understand antioxidant and antimicrobial activities from citrus essential oils. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shehata, S.A.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Ali, M.R.; Mohamed, R.M.; Bob, R.I.; Abdelgawad, K.F. Effect of some citrus essential oils on post-harvest shelf life and physicochemical quality of strawberries during cold storage. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, L.X.; Zhang, B.Y.; Zhu, H.J.; Pan, L.; Cao, F. Bioactive metabolites from Talaromyces purpureogenus, an endophytic fungus from Panax notoginseng. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 974–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Celia, C.; Trapasso, E.; Locatelli, M.; Navarra, M.; Ventura, C.A.; Wolfram, J.; Carafa, M.; Morittu, V.M.; Britti, D.; Di Marzio, L.; et al. Anticancer activity of liposomal bergamot essential oil (BEO) on human neuroblastoma cells. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 112, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dudai, N.; Weinstein, Y.; Krup, M.; Rabinski, T.; Ofir, R. Citral is a new inducer of caspase-3 in tumor cell lines. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xia, H.; Liang, W.; Song, Q.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Hong, J. The in vitro study of apoptosis in NB4 cell induced by citral. Cytotechnology 2013, 65, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Subba, M.S.; Soumithri, T.C.; Rao, R.S. Antimicrobial action of citrus oils. J. Food Sci. 1967, 32, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fisher, K.; Phillips, C.A. The effect of lemon, orange and bergamot essential oils and their components on the survival of Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in food systems. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fisher, K.; Phillips, C. In vitro inhibition of vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis in the presence of citrus essential oils. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 66, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; Romano, L.; Battaglia, F.; Lopizzo, T.; De Carolis, E.; Fadda, G. In vitro activity of Citrus bergamia (bergamot) oil against clinical isolates of dermatophytes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sah, A.N.; Juyal, V.; Melkani, A.B. Antimicrobial activity of six different parts of the plant Citrus medica Linn. Pharmacogn. J. 2011, 3, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Song, X.; Liu, T.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Wu, X. Antibacterial effects and mechanism of mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.) essential oil against Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2020, 25, 4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moreira, M.R.; Ponce, A.G.; Del Valle, C.E.; Roura, S.I. Inhibitory parameters of essential oils to reduce a foodborne pathogen. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Conte, A.; Speranza, B.; Sinigaglia, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Effect of lemon extract on foodborne microorganisms. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 1896–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Viuda-Martos, M.; Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J. Antifungal activity of lemon (Citrus lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. Food Control. 2008, 19, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Viuda-Martos, M.; Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Fernandez-Lopez, J.; Perez-Álvarez, J. Antibacterial activity of lemon (Citrus lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. J. Food Saf. 2008, 28, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Y.; Li, T.; Bai, J.; Nong, L.; Ning, Z.; Hu, Z.; Xu, A.; Xu, C.P. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. Cv. Shatian Yu. J. Biol. Act. Prod. from Nat. 2018, 8, 228–233. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mehmood, T.; Afzal, A.; Anwar, F.; Iqbal, M.; Afzal, M.; Qadir, R. Variations in the composition, antibacterial and haemolytic activities of peel essential oils from unripe and ripened Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck fruit. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Badawy, M.E.I.; Abdelgaleil, S.A.M. Composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils isolated from Egyptian plants against plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mirzaei-Najafgholi, H.; Tarighi, S.; Golmohammadi, M.; Taheri, P. The effect of citrus essential oils and their constituents on growth of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Molecules 2017, 22, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Caccioni, D.R.L.; Guizzardi, M.; Biondi, D.M.; Renda, A.; Ruberto, G. Relationship between volatile components of citrus fruit essential oils and antimicrobial action on Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 43, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kuate, J.; Foko, J.; Ndindeng, S.A.; Jazet-Dongmo, P.M.; Fouré, E.; Damesse, F.; Bella-Manga; Ducelier, D. Effect of essential oils from citrus varieties on in vitro growth and sporulation of Phaeoramularia angolensis causing citrus leaf and fruit spot disease. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2006, 114, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chuah, T.S.; Tan, Y.Y.; Ismail, B.S. In vitro evaluation of the antifungal activity of some essential oils on post-harvest fungal pathogens of tropical fruits. Plant Prot. Q. 2010, 25, 162–164. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bosquez-Molina, E.; Ronquillo-de Jesús, E.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Verde-Calvo, J.R.; Morales-López, J. Inhibitory effect of essential oils against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Rhizopus stolonifer in stored papaya fruit and their possible application in coatings. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 57, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Badawy, F.I.; Sallam, M.N.; Ibrahim, A.R.; Asran, M.R. Efficacy of some essential oils on controlling green mold of orange and their effects on postharvest quality parameters. Plant. Pathol. J. 2011, 10, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Van Hung, P.; Chi, P.T.; Phi, N.T. Comparison of antifungal activities of Vietnamese citrus essential oils. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 506–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Delkhoon, S.; Fahim, M.; Hosseinzadeh, J.; Panahi, O. Effect of lemon essential oil on the developmental stages of Trialeurodes vaporariorum West (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 2013, 46, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sauer, A.V.; Santos, E.M.; Gonçalves-Zuliani, A.M.O.; Nocchi, P.T.R.; Nunes, W.M.C.; Bonato, C.M. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity in vitro of different essential oils as alternative treatments to control Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1065, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bnina, E.B.; Hajlaoui, H.; Chaieb, I.; Daami-Remadi, M.; Said, M.B.; Jannet, H.B. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and insecticidal activities of the tunisian Citrus aurantium essential oils. Czech. J. Food Sci. 2019, 37, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pawar, V.C.; Thaker, V.S. In vitro efficacy of 75 essential oils against Aspergillus niger. Mycoses 2006, 49, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Saeidi, M.; Moharramipour, S.; Sefidkon, F.; Aghajanzadeh, S. Insecticidal and repellent activities of Citrus reticulata, Citrus limon and Citrus aurantium essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus. Integr. Prot. Stored Prod. 2011, 69, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  80. Lamine, M.; Gargouri, M.; Rahali, F.Z.; Mliki, A. Recovering and characterizing phenolic compounds from citrus by-product: A way towards agriculture of subsistence and sustainable bioeconomy. Waste Biomass Valor. 2021, 12, 4721–4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Papachristos, D.P.; Kimbaris, A.C.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Polissiou, M.G. Toxicity of citrus essential oils against Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2009, 155, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De Souza, E.L.; De Oliveira Lima, E.; De Luna Freire, K.R.; De Sousa, C.P. Inhibitory action of some essential oils and phytochemicals on the growth of various moulds isolated from foods. Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol. 2005, 48, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Vitoratos, A.; Bilalis, D.; Karkanis, A.; Efthimiadou, A. Antifungal activity of plant essential oils against Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium italicum and Penicillium digitatum. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2013, 41, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ammad, F.; Moumen, O.; Gasem, A.; Othmane, S.; Hisashi, K.N.; Zebib, B.; Merah, O. The potency of lemon (Citrus limon L.) essential oil to control some fungal diseases of grapevine wood. Comptes Rendus-Biol. 2018, 341, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Singh, P.; Shukla, R.; Prakash, B.; Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Mishra, P.K.; Dubey, N.K. Chemical profile, antifungal, antiaflatoxigenic and antioxidant activity of Citrus maxima Burm. and Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck essential oils and their cyclic monoterpene, DL-limonene. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1734–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sah, B.; Subban, K.; Chelliah, J. Cloning and sequence analysis of 10-deacetylbaccatin III-10-O-acetyl transferase gene and WRKY1 transcription factor from taxol-producing endophytic fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Kabra, A.O.; Bairagi, G.B.; Mahamuni, A.S.; Wanare, R.S. In vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of the peels of Citrus medica L. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2012, 3, 34–37. [Google Scholar]
  88. Abd-Alla, M.A.; Haggag, W.M. Use of some plant essential oils as post-harvest botanical fungicides in the management of anthracnose disease of mango fruits (Mangifera indica L.) caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz). Int. J. Agric. For. 2013, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  89. Vilaplana, R.; Pazmiño, L.; Valencia-Chamorro, S. Control of anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum musae, on postharvest organic banana by thyme oil. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 138, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qadir, R.; Farooq Anwar, T.M.; Shahid, M.; Zahoor, S. Variations in chemical composition, antimicrobial and haemolytic activities of peel essential oils from three local Citrus cultivars. Pure Appl. Biol. 2018, 7, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tao, N.G.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, M.L. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of essential oil from the peel of bingtang sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 1281–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Singh, G.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Narayanan, C.S.; Padmkumari, K.P.; Rao, G.P. Chemical and fungitoxic investigations on the essential oil of Citrus sinensis (L.) Pers/Untersuchungen über die chemie und fungitoxizität der ätherischen öle von Citrus sinensis (L.) Pers. zeitschrift für pflanzenkrankheiten und pflanzenschutz. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 1993, 100, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  93. Shukla, A.C.; Shani, S.K.; Dixit, A. Epicarp of Citrus sinensis: A potential source of natural pesticide. Ind. Phytopath. 2000, 53, 468–471. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sharma, N.; Tripathi, A. Fungitoxicity of the essential oil of Citrus sinensis on post-harvest pathogens. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sharma, N.; Tripathi, A. Effects of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck epicarp essential oil on growth and morphogenesis of Aspergillus niger (L.) Van Tieghem. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Rozwalka, L.C.; De Costa Lima, M.L.R.Z.; Mio, L.L.M.D.; Nakashima, T. Extracts, decoctions and essential oils of medicinal and aromatic plants in the inhibition of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Glomerella cingulata isolates from guava fruits. Ciência Rural 2008, 38, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Velázquez-Nuñez, M.J.; Avila-Sosa, R.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A. Antifungal activity of orange (Citrus sinensis var. Valencia) peel essential oil applied by direct addition or vapor contact. Food Control. 2013, 31, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Palou, L.; Valencia-Chamorro, S.A.; Pérez-Gago, M.B. Antifungal edible coatings for fresh citrus fruit: A review. Coatings 2015, 5, 962–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chaisiri, C.; Luo, C.X.; Liu, X.Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.B.; Xiong, B. Phylogenetic analysis and development of molecular tool for detection of Diaporthe citri causing melanose disease of citrus. Plants 2020, 9, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Salvatore, M.M.; Andolfi, A.; Nicoletti, R. The thin line between pathogenicity and endophytism: The case of Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Agriculture 2020, 10, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Phillips, C.A.; Laird, K.; Allen, S.C. The use of Citri-VTM ®-An antimicrobial citrus essential oil vapour for the control of Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus niger and Alternaria alternata in vitro and on food. Food Res. Int. 2012, 47, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kumar, A.; Kudachikar, V.B. Antifungal properties of essential oils against anthracnose disease: A critical appraisal. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 2018, 125, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karapinar, M. The effects of citrus oils and some spices on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus NRRL 2999. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1985, 2, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rammanee, K.; Hongpattarakere, T. Effects of tropical citrus essential oils on growth, aflatoxin production, and ultrastructure alterations of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2011, 4, 1050–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bamba, R.; Sumbali, G. Co-occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and cyclopiazonic acid in sour lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) during post-harvest pathogenesis by Aspergillus flavus. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sandoval-Contreras, T.; Marín, S.; Villarruel-López, A.; Gschaedler, A.; Garrido-Sánchez, L.; Ascencio, F. Growth modeling of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from citrus fruit as a function of temperature on a synthetic medium from lime (Citrus latifolia T.) pericarp. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Saito, S.; Wang, F.; Xiao, C.L. Efficacy of natamycin against gray mold of stored Mandarin fruit caused by isolates of Botrytis cinerea with multiple fungicide resistance. Plant. Dis. 2020, 104, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mbili, N.C.; Opara, U.L.; Lennox, C.L.; Vries, F.A. Citrus and lemongrass essential oils inhibit Botrytis cinerea on ‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Granny Smith’ apples. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 2017, 124, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Moraes Bazioli, J.; Belinato, J.R.; Costa, J.H.; Akiyama, D.Y.; Pontes, D.M.; Kupper, K.C.; Augusto, F.; de Carvalho, J.E.; Fill, T.P. Biological control of citrus postharvest phytopathogens. Toxins 2019, 11, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Rodov, V.; Ben-Yehoshua, S.; De Fang, Q.; Kim, J.J.; Ashkenazi, R. Preformed antifungal compounds of lemon fruit: Citral and its relation to disease resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. OuYang, Q.; Tao, N.; Jing, G. Transcriptional profiling analysis of Penicillium digitatum, the causal agent of citrus green mold, unravels an inhibited ergosterol biosynthesis pathway in response to citral. BMC Genomics 2016, 17, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Suprapta, D.N.; Arai, K.; Iwai, H. Effects of volatile compounds on arthrospore germination and mycelial growth of Geotrichum candidum citrus race. Mycoscience 1997, 38, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Klieber, A.; Scott, E.; Wuryatmo, E. Effect of method of application on antifungal efficacy of citral against postharvest spoilage fungi of citrus in culture. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2002, 31, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wuryatmo, E.; Klieber, A.; Scott, E.S. Inhibition of citrus postharvest pathogens by vapor of citral and related compounds in culture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhou, H.; Tao, N.; Jia, L. Antifungal activity of citral, octanal and α-terpineol against Geotrichum citri-aurantii. Food Control. 2014, 37, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wu, Y.; OuYang, Q.; Tao, N. Plasma membrane damage contributes to antifungal activity of citronellal against Penicillium digitatum. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 3853–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Yang, R.; Miao, J.; Shen, Y.; Cai, N.; Wan, C.; Zou, L.; Chen, C.; Chen, J. Antifungal effect of cinnamaldehyde, eugenol and carvacrol nanoemulsion against Penicillium digitatum and application in postharvest preservation of citrus fruit. Lwt 2021, 141, 110924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. du Plooy, W.; Regnier, T.; Combrinck, S. Essential oil amended coatings as alternatives to synthetic fungicides in citrus postharvest management. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 53, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, J.; Ma, S.; Du, S.; Chen, S.; Sun, H. Antifungal activity of thymol and carvacrol against postharvest pathogens Botrytis cinerea. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hink, W.F.; Fee, B.J. Toxicity of D-limonene, the major component of citrus peel oil, to all life stages of the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1986, 23, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. da Cruz Silva, G.; de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Ribeiro M de, M.M.; de Souza, C.W.O.; Ferreira, M.D. Antibacterial activity of nanoemulsions based on essential oils compounds against species of Xanthomonas that cause citrus canker. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 1835–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shimada, T.; Endo, T.; Fujii, H.; Rodríguez, A.; Peña, L.; Omura, M. Characterization of three linalool synthase genes from Citrus unshiu Marc. and analysis of linalool-mediated resistance against Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Penicilium italicum in citrus leaves and fruits. Plant Sci. 2014, 229, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shimada, T.; Endo, T.; Rodríguez, A.; Fujii, H.; Goto, S.; Matsuura, T.; Hojo, Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Fujikawa, T.; et al. Ectopic accumulation of linalool confers resistance to Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri in transgenic sweet orange plants. Tree Physiol. 2017, 37, 654–664. [Google Scholar]
  124. Wang, H.; Tao, N.; Huang, S.; Liu, Y. Effect of Shatangju (Citrus reticulata Blanco) essential oil on spore germination and mycelium growth of Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2012, 15, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Droby, S.; Eick, A.; Macarisin, D.; Cohen, L.; Rafael, G.; Stange, R.; McColum, G.; Dudai, N.; Nasser, A.; Wisniewski, M.; et al. Role of citrus volatiles in host recognition, germination and growth of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 49, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rodríguez, A.; Andrés, V.S.; Cervera, M.; Redondo, A.; Alquézar, B.; Shimada, T.; Gadea, J.; Rodrigo, M.J.; Zacarías, L.; Palou, L.; et al. Terpene down-regulation in orange reveals the role of fruit aromas in mediating interactions with insect herbivores and pathogens. Plant. Physiol. 2011, 156, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Ioannou, C.S.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Kouloussis, N.A.; Tananaki, C.I.; Katsoyannos, B.I. Essential oils of citrus fruit stimulate oviposition in the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Physiol. Entomol. 2012, 37, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Papanastasiou, S.A.; Bali, E.M.D.; Ioannou, C.S.; Papachristos, D.P.; Zarpas, K.D.; Papadopoulos, N.T. Toxic and hormetic-like effects of three components of citrus essential oils on adult Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Papanastasiou, S.A.; Ioannou, C.S.; Papadopoulos, N.T. Oviposition-deterrent effect of linalool–a compound of citrus essential oils–on female Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pest. Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3066–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Faraone, N.; De Cristofaro, A.; Maltese, M.; Vitagliano, S.; Caleca, V. First data on the repellent activity of essential oils of Citrus limon towards medfly (Ceratitis capitata). New Medit 2012, 11, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kouloussis, N.A.; Katsoyannos, B.I.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Ioannou, C.S.; Iliadis, I.V. Enhanced mating competitiveness of Ceratitis capitata males following exposure to citrus compounds. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Niogret, J.; Epsky, N.D. Attraction of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) sterile males to essential oils: The importance of linalool. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 1287–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hollingsworth, R.G. Limonene, a citrus extract, for control of mealybugs and scale insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2005, 98, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mari, M.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Sivakumar, D. Decay control in the postharvest system: Role of microbial and plant volatile organic compounds. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 122, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sánchez-González, L.; Vargas, M.; González-Martínez, C.; Chiralt, A.; Cháfer, M. Use of essential oils in bioactive edible coatings: A review. Food Eng. Rev. 2011, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Li, Y.; Wu, C.; Wu, T.; Yuan, C.; Hu, Y. Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of coating with chitosan–citrus essential oil and effect on the quality of Pacific mackerel during chilled storage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1131–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Sánchez-González, L.; Cháfer, M.; Chiralt, A.; González-Martínez, C. Physical properties of edible chitosan films containing bergamot essential oil and their inhibitory action on Penicillium italicum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. El Guilli, M.; Hamza, A.; Clément, C.; Ibriz, M.; Barka, E.A. Effectiveness of postharvest treatment with chitosan to control citrus green mold. Agriculture 2016, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Bill, M.; Chidamba, L.; Gokul, J.K.; Korsten, L. Mango endophyte and epiphyte microbiome composition during fruit development and post-harvest stages. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kumar, A.; Zhimo, Y.; Biasi, A.; Salim, S.; Feygenberg, O.; Wisniewski, M.; Droby, S. Endophytic microbiome in the carposphere and its importance in fruit physiology and pathology. In Postharvest Biology and Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 12, pp. 73–88. ISBN 978-3-030-56529-9. [Google Scholar]
  141. Nicoletti, R. Endophytic fungi of citrus plants. Agriculture 2019, 9, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Wang, Z.; Sui, Y.; Li, J.; Tian, X.; Wang, Q. Biological control of postharvest fungal decays in citrus: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nicoletti, R.; Fiorentino, A. Plant bioactive metabolites and drugs produced by endophytic fungi of Spermatophyta. Agric 2015, 5, 918–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Scalvenzi, L. New frontiers of essential oils research: Biotransformation of the phytocomplex and its pure compounds by endophytic fungi. Acta Hortic. 2012, 1030, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rajani, P.; Rajasekaran, C.; Vasanthakumari, M.M.; Olsson, S.B.; Ravikanth, G.; Uma Shaanker, R. Inhibition of plant pathogenic fungi by endophytic Trichoderma spp. through mycoparasitism and volatile organic compounds. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Strobel, G.; Booth, E.; Schaible, G.; Mends, M.T.; Sears, J.; Geary, B. The Paleobiosphere: A novel device for the in vivo testing of hydrocarbon producing-utilizing microorganisms. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Pena, L.C.; Jung, L.F.; Savi, D.C.; Servienski, A.; Aluizio, R.; Goulin, E.H.; Galli-Terasawa, L.V.; de Noronha Sales Maia, B.H.L.; Annies, V.; Franco, C.R.C.; et al. A Muscodor strain isolated from Citrus sinensis and its production of volatile organic compounds inhibiting Phyllosticta citricarpa growth. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 2017, 124, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kaddes, A.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Sassi, K.; Nasraoui, B.; Jijakli, M.H. Endophytic fungal volatile compounds as solution for sustainable agriculture. Molecules 2019, 24, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Bussaban, B.; Nuangmek, W.; Matsui, K.; Lumyong, S. Biofumigation with the endophytic fungus Nodulisporium spp. CMU-UPE34 to control postharvest decay of citrus fruit. Crop. Prot. 2013, 45, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yu, D.; Wang, J.; Shao, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, H. Antifungal modes of action of tea tree oil and its two characteristic components against Botrytis cinerea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Wuryatmo, E.; Able, A.J.; Ford, C.M.; Scott, E.S. Effect of volatile citral on the development of blue mould, green mould and sour rot on navel orange. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2014, 43, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Majeed, H.; Bian, Y.-Y.; Ali, B.; Jamil, A.; Majeed, U.; Khan, Q.F.; Iqbal, K.J.; Shoemaker, C.F.; Fang, Z. Essential oil encapsulations: Uses, procedures, and trends. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 58449–58463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ciriminna, R.; Lomeli Rodriguez, M.; Demma Carà, P.; Lopez Sanchez, J.A.; Pagliaro, M. Limonene: A versatile chemical of the bioeconomy. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 15288–15296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Teigiserova, D.A.; Tiruta-Barna, L.; Ahmadi, A.; Hamelin, L.; Thomsen, M. A step closer to circular bioeconomy for citrus peel waste: A review of yields and technologies for sustainable management of essential oils. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Rodríguez, A.; Shimada, T.; Cervera, M.; Alquézar, B.; Gadea, J.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; De Ollas, C.J.; Rodrigo, M.J.; Zacarías, L.; Peña, L. Terpene down-regulation triggers defense responses in transgenic orange leading to resistance against fungal pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Essential oils reported from peels of Citrus fruits.
Table 1. Essential oils reported from peels of Citrus fruits.
Compound *Citrus SpeciesStructure
Monoterpenes
Alcohols and derivatives
BorneolC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11,21], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i001
CampherenolC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i002
CarvacrolC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i003
CarveolC. limetta [19], C. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i004
trans-CarveolC. limon [20,21], C. maxima [16], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i005
cis-CarveolC. limetta [20], C. maxima [16,17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i006
Citronellol (= citronellyl alcohol)C. aurantium [11], C. bergamia [14],C. limon [11], C. macroptera [16], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [11,24,26], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i007
α-CitronellolC. reticulata [26] Horticulturae 08 00396 i008
d-CitronellolC. hystrix [18] Horticulturae 08 00396 i009
DehydrocarveolC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i010
Geraniol (=geranyl alcohol)C. aurantifolia [8], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [21], C. limon [8,11], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. medica [23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,25], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i011
Geraniol methyl etherC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i012
Nerol (=Z-geraniol)C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. aurantifolia [8], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8],C. limetta [19], C. limon [8,11], C. maxima [17], C. medica [23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,25,26], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i013
Isopinocarveol (=pinocarveol)C. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i014
Limonene-1,2-diolC. tamurana [28,29], C. medica [22,23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i015
LinaloolC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. bergamia [13,14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19,20], C. limon [8,11,21], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16,17], C. medica [22,23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24,25], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i016
l-MentholC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i017
trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dienolC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i018
trans-p-Menth-2,8-dien-1-olC. limetta [20], C. maxima [16,17], C. medica [23], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i019
cis-p-Menth-2,8-dien-1-olC. limetta [20] Horticulturae 08 00396 i020
p-Menth-2,8-dien-1-olC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i021
p-Mentha-1,8-dien-10-olC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i022
p-Mentha-1-en-9-olC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i023
MyrcenolC. aurantium [10], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i024
trans-MyrtanolC. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i025
3,7-Nonadien-2-ol, 4,8-dimethylC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i026
PerillolC. limon [21], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i027
trans-PiperitolC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i028
cis-PiperitolC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i029
SabinolC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i030
trans-Sabinene hydrateC. bergamia [15], C. limetta [19], C. paradisi [17], C. sinensis [27] Horticulturae 08 00396 i031
cis-Sabinene hydrateC. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14], C. limetta [19], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11] Horticulturae 08 00396 i032
Terpinen-4-olC. limetta [19], C. aurantifolia [8], C. limonia [8], C. latifolia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16], C. hystrix [18], C. limon [8,11,21], C. reticulata [11,24], C. aurantium [11,12], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29], C. bergamia [14,15], C. medica [22,23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i033
α-TerpineolC. aurantifolia [8,9], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [8,11,21], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. medica [22], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24,25], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i034
ThymolC. reticulata [26] Horticulturae 08 00396 i035
cis-VerbenolC. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i036
trans-VerbenolC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i037
Aldehydes
CitronellalC. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [14], C. hystrix [18], C. limon [21], C. limonia [8], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [24,25], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i038
Cumin aldehydeC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i039
Geranial (=E-citral)C. aurantifolia [8], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16,17], C. medica [22,23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [24,25], C. sinensis [27] Horticulturae 08 00396 i040
Neral (=Z-citral)C. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [11,21], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. medica [22], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [25], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i041
PerillaldehydeC. bergamia [14], C. limetta [19], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [26], C. reticulata [24], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i042
Esters
Bornyl acetateC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i043
Carveol propionateC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i044
Citronellol acetateC. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. reticulata [25], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i045
Citronellol formateC. macroptera [16], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i046
Geraniol acetateC. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [8,11], C. medica [22], C. reticulata [11,25], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i047
Geraniol formateC. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i048
Geraniol propionateC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i049
Isobornyl acetateC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i050
Linalool acetate (=bergamiol)C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [13,14,15], C. limetta [19], C. limon [11], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i051
Linalool butyrateC. aurantium [10] Horticulturae 08 00396 i052
p-Mentha-1-en-9-yl acetateC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i053
Methyl geranateC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i054
MethylthymolC. reticulata [24] Horticulturae 08 00396 i055
Z-2-Octen-1-ol,3,7-dimethyl-, isobutyrateC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i056
Perillyl acetateC. bergamia [15], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i057
Terpineol acetate (=terpinyl acetate)C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. limetta [19], C. limon [11], C. medica [23], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i058
β-Terpinyl acetateC. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i059
Hydrocarbons
CampheneC. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19,20], C. limon [8,11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i060
2-CareneC. reticulata [24] Horticulturae 08 00396 i061
3-CareneC. aurantium [10,11], C. bergamia [14], C. limon [11,21], C. medica [22], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i062
o-CymeneC. aurantium [12], C. limon [21], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i063
m-CymeneC. latifolia [8], C. limonia [8] Horticulturae 08 00396 i064
p-CymeneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [20], C. limon [8,11], C. limonia [8], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i065
α-FencheneC. aurantium [12], C. limon [21], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i066
IsolimoneneC. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i067
LimoneneC. medica [23], C. latifolia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. paradisi [17], C. limon [8,11,21], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. sinensis [8,11,27], C. bergamia [13,14,15], C. reticulata [11,25], C. tamurana [28,29], C. maxima [16,17], C. aurantifolia [8,9] Horticulturae 08 00396 i068
d-LimoneneC. hystrix [18], C. limetta [19,20], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [24] Horticulturae 08 00396 i069
l-LimoneneC. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i070
Myrcene (= β-myrcene)C. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19,20], C. limon [11], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [11,24,25], C. sinensis [8,11,27], C. tamurana [28,29], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i071
Allo-OcimeneC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i072
E-β-OcimeneC. aurantium [10,11], C. bergamia [14], C. limetta [11], C. reticulata [11,24,25], C. sinensis [11,27] Horticulturae 08 00396 i073
Z-β-OcimeneC. bergamia [14,15], C. medica [22], C. reticulata [25], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i074
Z-1,3,6-Octatriene,3,7-dimethyl-C. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i075
α-PhellandreneC. medica [22], C. latifolia [8], C. bergamia [14,15], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i076
β-PhellandreneC. bergamia [15], C. reticulata [24], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i077
α-PineneC. aurantifolia [8,9], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19,20], C. limon [8,11], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16,17], C. medica [22,23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24,25], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i078
β-PineneC. limetta [19], C. medica [22], C. limonia [8], C. latifolia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. hystrix [18], C. paradisi [17], C. aurantium [10,11,12], C. bergamia [13,14,15], C. limon [11,21], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [11,27], C. aurantifolia [8,9], C. tamurana [28,29], C. maxima [16,17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i079
SabineneC. aurantifolia [8,9], C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. limetta [19], C. limon [8,11], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16,17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,25], C. sinensis [11,27] Horticulturae 08 00396 i080
d-SabineneC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i081
α-TerpineneC. aurantifolia [8,9], C. aurantium [11], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [8,11], C. limonia [8], C. maxima [17], C. medica [22], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i082
γ-TerpineneC. aurantifolia [8,9], C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [13,14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [8,11,21], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16,17], C. medica [22], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i083
TerpinoleneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [11], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [11], C. limonia [8], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [8,11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i084
α-ThujeneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [8,11], C. limonia [8], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [11,27], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i085
β-ThujeneC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i086
TricycleneC. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [14], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11] Horticulturae 08 00396 i087
Ketones
CamphorC. aurantium [11], C. limetta [19], C. limon [11,21], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [11] Horticulturae 08 00396 i088
δ-CamphorC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i089
CarvomenthoneC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i090
l-CarvoneC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i091
CarvoneC. bergamia [15], C. maxima [16,17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i092
cis-DihydrocarvoneC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11] Horticulturae 08 00396 i093
IsopiperitoneC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i094
MenthoneC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i095
Sabina ketoneC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i096
3-Terpinolenone (=piperitone)C. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i097
Oxides
4,5-EpoxycareneC. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i098
Carvone oxideC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i099
1,8-Cineole (= eucalyptol)C. aurantifolia [9], C. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [15], C. limon [11], C. macroptera [16], C. reticulata [11,25], C. sinensis [11] Horticulturae 08 00396 i100
cis-Limonene-1,2-epoxideC. bergamia [14], C. maxima [16], C. reticulata [25], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i101
trans-Limonene-1,2,-epoxideC. bergamia [14,15], C. limon [21], C. reticulata [25], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i102
Z-Linalool pyranoxideC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i103
cis-Linalool-oxideC. aurantium [10,11], C. bergamia [15], C. hystrix [18], C. limetta [20], C. limon [11], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i104
trans-Linalool oxideC. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [15], C. hystrix [18], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [16], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i105
Myrcene epoxideC. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i106
Nerol oxideC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i107
7-Oxabicycloheptane, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)C. medica [23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i108
PerilleneC. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i109
α-Pinene oxideC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i110
Rose furan epoxideC. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i111
Sesquiterpenes
Alcohols and derivatives
α-BisabololC. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [21], C. medica [22,23], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i112
β-BisabololC. limon [21], C. limetta [19], C. medica [22,23] Horticulturae 08 00396 i113
α-CadinolC. macroptera [16], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i114
CedrenolC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i115
CedrolC. bergamia [15], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i116
CubenolC. macroptera [16] Horticulturae 08 00396 i117
ElemolC. aurantifolia [9], C. hystrix [18], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i118
α-EudesmolC. aurantifolia [9] Horticulturae 08 00396 i119
β-EudesmolC. aurantifolia [9], C. macroptera [16], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i120
γ-EudesmolC. aurantifolia [9], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i121
7-epi-α-EudesmolC. aurantifolia [9] Horticulturae 08 00396 i122
2E,6E-FarnesolC. limetta [19], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i123
2Z,6E-FarnesolC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i124
GlobulolC. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i125
LedolC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i126
E-NerolidolC. reticulata [25], C. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [15], C. macroptera [16], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i127
Z-NerolidolC. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [26], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i128
α-SantalolC. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i129
E-β-santalolC. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i130
E-sesquisabinene hydrateC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i131
SpathulenolC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i132
ValerianolC. aurantifolia [9] Horticulturae 08 00396 i133
ViridiflorolC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i134
Aldehydes
α-SinensalC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [26] Horticulturae 08 00396 i135
β-SinensalC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [26], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i136
Hydrocarbons
AromadendreneC. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i137
α-BergamoteneC. bergamia [15] Horticulturae 08 00396 i138
cis-α-BergamoteneC. latifolia [8], C. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i139
trans-α-BergamoteneC. aurantifolia [8], C. bergamia [14], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. limon [8], C. limonia [8], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i140
BicyclogermacreneC. bergamia [14], C. macroptera [16] Horticulturae 08 00396 i141
α-BisaboleneC. latifolia [8], C. limetta [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i142
β-BisaboleneC. aurantifolia [8], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [8], C. limonia [8], C. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i143
E-γ-BisaboleneC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i144
Z-γ-BisaboleneC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i145
β-CadineneC. hystrix [18] Horticulturae 08 00396 i146
δ-CadineneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. limonia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. medica [22,23], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i147
α-CedreneC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i148
α-Caryophyllene (=humulene)C. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [11,12],C. bergamia [14], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [11], C. macroptera [16], C. medica [23], C. reticulata [11,25], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i149
β-CaryophylleneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [8], C. limon [8], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. medica [22,23], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [25], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i150
α-CopaeneC. aurantium [12], C. hystrix [18], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i151
α-CubebeneC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i152
β-CubebeneC. hystrix [18], C. macroptera [16], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i153
α-CurcumeneC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i154
β-CurcumeneC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i155
β-ElemeneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. macroptera [16], C. sinensis [27], C. tamurana [28,29], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i156
δ-ElemeneC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [14], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [24], C. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i157
γ-ElemeneC. reticulata [24], C. aurantium [12], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i158
E,E-α-FarneseneC. limetta [19], C. macroptera [16], C. maxima [17], C. medica [23], C. paradisi [17], C. unshiu [30] Horticulturae 08 00396 i159
E-β-FarneseneC. aurantifolia [8], C. bergamia [15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i160
Z-β-FarneseneC. bergamia [14], C. medica [23], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i161
Germacrene BC. reticulata [25,26] Horticulturae 08 00396 i162
Germacrene DC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [11], C. bergamia [14,15], C. hystrix [18], C. latifolia [8], C. limon [8,11,21], C. macroptera [16], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [11,24], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i163
α-Muurolene (=α-Cadinene)C. macroptera [16], C. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i164
Z-β-SantaleneC. bergamia [14], C. limetta [19], C. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i165
epi-β-SantaleneC. limetta [19] Horticulturae 08 00396 i166
SesquiphellandreneC. bergamia [14], C. limetta [21], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i167
SesquithujeneC. bergamia [14] Horticulturae 08 00396 i168
SeychelleneC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i169
ValeceneC. aurantium [11], C. limon [11], C. reticulata [11], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i170
α-YlangeneC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i171
β-YlangeneC. tamurana [29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i172
ZizaeneC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i173
Esters
Cedryl acetateC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i174
2E,6E-Farnesol acetateC. aurantium [12], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i175
MethopreneC. medica [22] Horticulturae 08 00396 i176
Nerolidol acetateC. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i177
Nerol acetateC. aurantifolia [8], C. aurantium [12], C. bergamia [14,15], C. latifolia [8], C. limetta [19], C. medica [22,23], C. reticulata [25], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i178
Nerol formateC. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i179
Ketones
β-IononeC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i180
NootkatoneC. bergamia [14,15], C. paradisi [16,17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i181
Oxides
Caryophyllene oxideC. aurantium [11,12], C. bergamia [15], C. limon [11], C. maxima [17], C. paradisi [17], C. reticulata [11,25], C. sinensis [11], C. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i182
Diterpenes
Geranyl α-terpineneC. sinensis [27] Horticulturae 08 00396 i183
E-PhytolC. reticulata [25] Horticulturae 08 00396 i184
Coumarins
BergamottinC. bergamia [13] Horticulturae 08 00396 i185
BergaptenC. bergamia [13] Horticulturae 08 00396 i186
CitroptenC. bergamia [13] Horticulturae 08 00396 i187
5-Geranyloxy-7-methoxycoumarinC. bergamia [13] Horticulturae 08 00396 i188
Phenylpropanoids
Cinnamic aldehydeC. paradisi [17] Horticulturae 08 00396 i189
Cinnamyl alcoholC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i190
α-CurcuminC. aurantifolia [9] Horticulturae 08 00396 i191
EstragoleC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i192
Ethyl cinnamateC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i193
Ethyl p-methoxycinnamateC. limon [21] Horticulturae 08 00396 i194
EugenolC. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i195
IsoeugenolC. tamurana [28,29] Horticulturae 08 00396 i196
IsosafroleC. reticulata [26] Horticulturae 08 00396 i197
Methyl eugenolC. maxima [16] Horticulturae 08 00396 i198
Miscellaneous
E-SolanoneC. bergamia [15] Horticulturae 08 00396 i199
SulcatoneC. bergamia [15], C. limon [21], C. reticulata [25], C. tamurana [28] Horticulturae 08 00396 i200
* Stereochemistry is reported when inferable from the original manuscripts.
Table 2. Bioactivity of essential oils extracted from citrus peels as related to fruit quality.
Table 2. Bioactivity of essential oils extracted from citrus peels as related to fruit quality.
SpeciesBioactivityReferences
C. aurantifoliaAcaricidal[9]
Antibacterial[67,68]
Antifungal[8,67,69,70,71,72,73,74]
Insecticidal[75]
C. aurantiumAntibacterial[12,47,49,68,76,77]
Antifungal[49,77,78]
Antioxidant[12,47,49]
Insecticidal[77,79]
C. bergamiaAntibacterial[56,57]
Antifungal[77,78,80]
Antioxidant[48]
Insecticidal[81]
C. latifoliaAntifungal[8,70]
C. limonAntibacterial[47,49,50,55,56,57,61,62,64,66,67]
Antifungal[8,49,50,55,62,63,67,69,70,71,73,78,82,83,84]
Antioxidant[46,47,49]
Insecticidal[33,79,81]
C. limoniaAntifungal[8]
C. maximaAntibacterial[65]
Antifungal[70,74,85]
C. medicaAntibacterial[86,87]
Antifungal[59,88]
C. paradisiAntibacterial[64,67]
Antifungal[63,64,67,69,70,73,89]
Insecticidal[33]
C. reticulataAntibacterial[47,49,50,60,64]
Antifungal[24,25,49,50,63,69,70,74,90]
Antioxidant[47,49]
Insecticidal[79]
C. sinensisAntibacterial[47,50,55,56,57,64,67,73,90,91]
Antifungal[50,55,63,67,70,73,74,85,88,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]
Antioxidant[47]
C. unshiuAntibacterial[30]
Antifungal[70]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salvatore, M.M.; Nicoletti, R.; Andolfi, A. Essential Oils in Citrus Fruit Ripening and Postharvest Quality. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050396

AMA Style

Salvatore MM, Nicoletti R, Andolfi A. Essential Oils in Citrus Fruit Ripening and Postharvest Quality. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(5):396. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salvatore, Maria Michela, Rosario Nicoletti, and Anna Andolfi. 2022. "Essential Oils in Citrus Fruit Ripening and Postharvest Quality" Horticulturae 8, no. 5: 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050396

APA Style

Salvatore, M. M., Nicoletti, R., & Andolfi, A. (2022). Essential Oils in Citrus Fruit Ripening and Postharvest Quality. Horticulturae, 8(5), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop