Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of bHLH Transcription Factor Family in Rose (Rosa chinensis Jacq.) under Botrytis cinerea Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Deciphers Genotype and Ammonium as Key Factors for the Micropropagation of Bryophyllum sp. Medicinal Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Indirect Selection for Seed Yield in Sacha-Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in Brazil

by
Jhon Paul Mathews Delgado
1,
Francisco Célio Maia Chaves
2,
Ricardo Lopes
2,
Carlos Meneses
3,
Magno Sávio Ferreira Valente
4,
Filipe Almendagna Rodrigues
5,
Moacir Pasqual
5,
Santiago Ferreyra Ramos
6,
Ananda Virginia de Aguiar
7 and
Maria Teresa Gomes Lopes
1,*
1
Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Avenida Rodrigo Otávio Ramos, 3.000, Bairro Coroado, Manaus 69077-000, AM, Brazil
2
Campo Experimental da Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Km 29, AM 010, CP. 319, Manaus 69010-970, AM, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Bairro Universitário, Campina Grande 58429-500, PB, Brazil
4
Campo Experimental do Instituto Federal do Amazonas, Instituto Federal do Amazonas, Av. Onça Pintada s/n, Presidente Figueiredo, 69735-000, AM, Brazil
5
Departamento de Agricultura, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Avenida Doutor Sylvio Menicucci, 1001, Bairro Kennedy, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
6
Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Rua Nossa Senhora do Rosário, 3863, Bairro Tiradentes, Itacoatiara 69100-000, AM, Brazil
7
Laboratório de Pólen, Embrapa Florestas, Km 111, BR 476, CP. 319, Colombo 83411-000, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(11), 988; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110988
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 24 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022

Abstract

:
Breeding programs for improvement of sacha-inchi, Plukenetia volubilis L., generally aim to select individuals with greater seed yield since there is a strong correlation between seed yield and oil production. However, the manual removal of seed husks for evaluating this trait is laborious and costly, thereby discouraging breeding efforts. Accordingly, the objective of the present study was to estimate gains from indirect selection of seed production in sacha-inchi progenies, focusing on maximizing efficiency in improvement programs. Genetic parameters along with direct and indirect selection gains were estimated for seed yield traits in 12 open-pollinated progenies. Strong genetic correlations were observed between total number of fruits (TNF), total weight of fruits (TWF), and total weight of seeds (TWS) per plant (r > 0.96). Notably, all three traits demonstrated high heritability (h2 > 0.81). Therefore, plants with high TNF and TWF (Cuzco, Dos de Mayo, Shanao, Aucaloma, and AM-7) can be used to indirectly select the genetic traits of higher seed yields (GS% = 23%). Genetic gain for dry seed production with a selection index of 42% was estimated at 23%, which corresponds to 118 kg·ha−1. Future sacha-inchi improvement programs can select progenies with high TNF and TWF to facilitate the selection of progenies with high TWS.

1. Introduction

Sacha-inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L., Euphorbiaceae) is a twining vine plant that grows naturally at the edges of secondary forests. Natural populations of sacha-inchi are found in the Lesser Antilles, Suriname, and the northwest portion of the Amazon basin, which includes parts of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil [1]. Today, the species is typically grown by small producers, usually at altitudes of ≤900 m [2,3,4]. Environmental differences between the species’ natural range and the areas where the plant is cultivated indicate the species can adapt to different pedoclimatic conditions, including those found in southeast Brazil (e.g., São Paulo; [5]) and southeast Yunnan, China (e.g., Xishuagbanna; [6]).
The plant species is cultivated for having nutraceutical properties. Its seeds contain high levels of unsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid (35–41%) and linolenic acid (37–44%), tocopherols (0.786–0.137 mg·g−1), and proteins (27%) [7,8], thereby attracting scientific and commercial interest [9]. The oil content in the dried seeds of P. volubilis ranges from 33–58% [9]. In Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, 37 genotypes of P. volubilis were included having average dry seeds of 10.2% with ranges of 10.2–58.0% [2,3,4].
There are no sacha-inchi cultivars improved by public institutions or by private enterprise. Even though genetic variation is present, crops are being developed without considering the optimum genetic features to facilitate an increase in yields among different producing regions. Farmers acquire seeds through exchanges or from local markets [4]. The dynamics of self-supplying seeds possibly have contributed to the reduced diversity of crops grown by communities of small producers in large geographic areas [3]. Contrastingly, populations that are more isolated from main trading centers are likely more divergent.
The results of AFLP-based genetic diversity studies indicate that there is a significant difference between the sacha-inchi population from the community of Dos de Mayo (San Martin, Peru) and populations from communities located within a 70 km radius [2,3], further suggesting that the crop could be improved using mass selection. Producers chiefly use larger seeds to establish their crops, with the aim of increasing yield. However, because the species is allogamous [10] and selection is performed after fruit production, such efforts only apply to female genitors. Thus, the genetic gains are lower than those obtained from controlled crossings.
Studies of the genetic basis of sacha-inchi seed yield components and the correlations between them may advance the development of selection strategies that promote greater genetic gains and allow farmers to develop cultivars more rapidly with higher yields.
Even though the species has been the focus of botanical, morphological, genetic, agronomic, and food technology studies [9], there are still many gaps in the species’ production system. One of the most prominent of these gaps is the absence of cultivars, and even though sacha-inchi has been used and cultivated for millennia, the species is still considered incompletely domesticated. In fact, the species’ germplasm was only recently characterized.
As the oil extracted from sacha-inchi seeds is the most commercially relevant product from the species, seed yield is an important variable in cultivar selection [6]. However, to evaluate seed yield, seeds must be manually removed from the fruits after collection. This process can be expensive when assessing a large number of samples. Valente et al. [11] demonstrated that the simultaneous selection of several sacha-inchi yield traits (i.e., number of fruits, weight of fruits, and number of seeds per plant) yielded similar genetic gains. Nonetheless, comparisons of these traits with significant seed yield have yet to be reported.
Studies on the correlations between plant traits in selection populations are pertinent to plant improvement, especially due to the possibility of obtaining selection gains indirectly. Indirect selection is justified when a trait of interest is prohibitively costly or too complex to evaluate but is closely associated with another trait that is less costly or less complex to assess [12,13]. The decision to utilize indirect selection should be taken into consideration when estimating the gains of the process, which depend on the magnitude of the connection between the traits and their heritability, and the gap between such gains and those obtainable using direct selection.
To achieve continuous genetic gains with successive selection cycles, it is also important to maintain genetic diversity within the breeding population. In this regard, it is important to employ an appropriate selection intensity [14]. Mass selection allows the selection of individuals that will produce the subsequent generation. Even though this selection strategy can result in lower genetic gains, it allows the rapid generation of new cultivars with higher yields and is recommended for species in the initial stages of improvement [15,16].
The objectives of this study were (1) to estimate the genetic parameters and direct and indirect selection gains for seed production in open-pollinated sacha-inchi progenies and (2) to select superior individuals to produce improved seeds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The experiment was performed in the experimental field of the Embrapa headquarters in the western Amazon region (Manaus, Amazonas (AM), Brazil; 2°53′37.2″ S, 59°58′23.0″ W). The soil in the area is classified as dystrophic yellow ferrosol with a clayey texture according to the Brazilian System of Soil Classification [17]. The region has a humid equatorial climate, with a short dry season (July–September with a monthly rainfall of 50–100 mm), dry–humid transitional month (October), and a long humid season (November–June with a monthly rainfall of 200–300 mm). The mean annual temperature is 27 °C [18].

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with 12 half-sib progenies, three repetitions, and ten plants per plot. The progenies were obtained from open-pollinated fruits, eight from open markets of the Benjamin Constant, Amazonas, Brazil (Dos de Mayo, Shanao, São Pedro, Cuzco, Aucaloma, Ponto Renato, João Guerra, and Novo Horizonte) from the merchant’s farm and four progenies from Embrapa’s active sacha-inchi germplasm bank (AM-7, AM-13, AM-17, and AM-21) of the Careiro, Amazonas, Brazil (Table 1). The sacha-inchi progenies samples are registered in the Manuel de Arruda Câmara herbarium of the Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)—Campina Grande-Brazil, indexed under: SP:513555 (Novo Horizonte), UFACPZ:4868 (Cuzco), EAFM:2916 (Aucaloma), EVB:3271 (São Pedro), RB:RB00890091 (Shanao), RB:RB00088211 (Ponto Renato), HPL:2975 (Dos de Mayo), Botany:V0216784F (João Guerra), Botany:U.1268467 (AM7), Botany:U.1268462 (AM13), CGMS:75389 (AM17), and CGMS:65891 (AM21).

2.3. Seedling Production and Planting

The sacha-inchi progenies were sown on 1 August 2018, in styrofoam trays containing Plantmax® commercial substrate with the following chemical composition: N = 5.81 g·kg−1; P = 0.95 g·kg−1; K = 4.35 g·kg−1; Ca = 14.14 g·kg−1; Mg = 1.68 g·kg−1; S = 0.31 g·kg−1; B = 27.80 mg·kg−1; Fe = 19,826.0 mg·kg−1; Cu = 0.01 mg·kg−1; Mn = 225.0 mg·kg−1; Zn = 76.40 mg·kg−1. The resulting seedlings were transplanted into plastic bags, with dimensions of 20 cm × 30 cm, 14 days after sowing. The bags contained 2 kg of substrate, dystrophic yellow ferrosol with laying hen manure, in a ratio of 3:1. The chemical composition of the final substrate was: pH (water) 7.18; N = 6.42 g·kg−1; P = 1.06 g·kg−1; K = 5.05 g·kg−1; Ca = 18.01 g·kg−1; Mg = 1.92 g·kg−1; S = 0.29 g·kg−1; B = 29.04 mg·kg−1; Fe = 17,405.0 mg·kg−1; Cu = 0.09 mg·kg−1; Mn = 282.0 mg·kg−1; Zn = 66.20 mg·kg−1. When seedlings had two pairs of leaves and were ~20 cm high in bags, 15 days after the seedlings developed, the definitive planting was carried out. In fields, the soil acidity was corrected to pH 6.0 and based on the results of soil chemical analyses, 2 t·ha−1 dolomitic limestone (relative efficiency 80%) were applied 56 days before planting. In the planting pits, in dystrophic yellow ferrosol, 15.0 g urea, 35.0 g triple superphosphate, 23.0 g potassium chloride, and 1 kg laying hen manure were applied for foundation fertilization. On 3 December 2018, 1 March 2019, and 3 June 2019 (approximately every three months), a top-dressing was performed using 35 g urea, 35 g triple superphosphate, 23 g potassium chloride, and 1 L laying hen manure per plant.
The plants were cultivated using an espalier support system, with 3 m between rows and 2 m between plants. In each row, concrete posts were placed every 6 m and wires were fixed horizontally at 1.0 and 1.5 m from the soil. The plants were trained by tying the stems to the wires using cotton ties, and the crop received drip irrigation (1 L water per plant per day (d)) every 2 days during the rainy season (November–May) if it did not rain during that interval, and daily during the dry season (July–September).

2.4. Data Collection

Fruit collection was initiated in March 2019, ~212 days after planting, and was performed every week until August 2019 (i.e., for a total of six consecutive months). The fruits were collected by hand when they were dark brown (at the stage of maximum maturity before fruit dehiscence) dried in the shade at ambient temperature for 7 d, and dried further indoors at 18 °C for 30 d. After processing, the fruits of each progeny were evaluated for total number of fruits per plant (TNF), total weight (g) of fruits per plant (TWF), total number of seeds per plant (TNS), total weight (g) of seeds per plant (TWS), mean weight (g) of fruits (MWF), number of seeds per fruit (NSF), mean weight (g) of seeds (MWS), and TWS:TWF ratio.

2.5. Data Analysis

The components of variance and genetic parameters of each trait were estimated according to Cruz et al. (2012) and using the Genes software [19].
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed according to the following statistical model:
Yij = μ + Gi + Bj + eij,
where Yij represents observation of the nth progeny (i) of the nth block (j); μ represents overall mean; Gi represents random effect of the nth progeny; Bj represents random effect of the nth block; and eij represents random effect of the experimental error.
Broad-sense heritability was estimated as h2 = σ2g/σ2f, with the estimated σ2f calculated based on the mean of families. The coefficient of genetic variation between the progenies (CVg), the coefficient of environmental variation (CVe), and the coefficient of relative variation (CVr) were calculated using CVg = 100(σ2g)1/2/ x ¯ , CVe = 100(σ2e)1/2/ x ¯ , and CVr = CVg/CVe, respectively, where x ¯ is the overall mean.
Based on the result of the ANOVA, the genetic and phenotypic correlations were estimated as rg = σg(x,y)/(σgx σgy) and rp = σp(x,y)/(σfx σfy), respectively, where σg(x,y) = (σp(x,y) − σe(x,y))/r (blocks), σgx = (σp(x) − σe(x))/r, and σgy = (σp(y) − σe(y))/r. In addition, path analysis [20] was performed to determine the direct and indirect effects of traits that were correlated with TWS.
The gain expected from direct selection for trait X was estimated as follows: GSx = (XsXo) h2x = DS ∙ h2x, where Xs is the mean of the progenies selected for trait X, Xo is the mean of the original population. DS is the selection differential in the population and h2x is the heritability of trait X. Meanwhile, the gain expected from indirect selection for trait X, through selection for trait Y, was estimated as follows: GS = DSx(y) ∙ h2, where DSx(y) is the indirect selection differential obtained for X from the mean of the progenies selected for superiority in Y.
Relative estimated selection gain (GS%) was calculated as follows: GS% = GS ∙ 100/Xo, where Xo is the mean of the initial population. Intensities of 25, 33, and 42% were used for selection.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Genetic Parameters and Correlations

Considering the classification of the environmental variation coefficients (CVe) proposed by Pimental-Gomes [21] for the variables evaluated in the field, most values were low or intermediate, which indicated high and good experimental precision, respectively. However, TNF, TWF, and TWS yielded high CVe values and, thus, low experimental precision (Table 2). Even though there is no specific CVe classification for the variables analyzed in the present study, the TNF and TWF values reported for sacha-inchi by Valente et al. [11] were 58 and 63%, respectively, which were higher than those calculated in the present study.
ANOVA indicated that progeny effect was significant for all variables, except for start of fruit collection, which indicates genetic variation among the progenies, further suggesting that selection gains are possible (Table 2). Additionally, variability in fruit and seed size was observed in the studied accessions (Figure 1). Biogeographical analyses showed that natural selection on a combination of traits contributed to seed size variation, while movement between forest edge/light gap and canopy niches likely contributed to the seed size extremes in Plukenetia in the evolutive process [22]. The success of selection depends on variability in genetic resources and their responses to changing environments [23].
Fruit collection generally started at 212 days (~7 months) after plants were transferred to the field (Table 2). This differed from the start time reported by Valente et al. [11] for sacha-inchi fruit production in the Brazilian Amazonia (i.e., 6 months after planting).
Heritability varied from 82 to 85% for TNF, TWF, TNS, and TWS (Table 2). These results also differed from those of Valente et al. [11], who reported heritabilities of 34–36%, but this could be the result of using populations with different genetic backgrounds [12,24]. These findings may be explained by the genetic variability in progenies [25].
High estimated heritability and CVg/CVe values indicate that the conditions favored genetic gains through progeny selection (Table 2) and progeny-level mass selection [12,26,27].
High, positive, and statistically significant values (r ≥ 0.97) were obtained for the estimated genetic correlations between TWS and TNF, TNS and TWF (Table 3). Valente et al. [11] also reported a strong, positive, and significant correlation between TNF and TWF in sacha-inchi and in Jatropha curcas L., which belongs to the same family. A strong correlation was observed between seed weight and the remaining traits (r = 0.99) [28].
Sacha-inchi producers in Peru trade seeds according to their weight [4]. The results of the present study indicate that both TNF and TWF had high heritability estimates and were strongly correlated with TWS (Table 2 and Table 3).
The aforementioned sacha-inchi producers select plants for the size of the seeds they produce [9], because larger seeds are expected to yield greater mean seed weight. However, the present study found no significant correlation between mean seed weight and total seed weight per plant (Table 3). This suggests that the selection practiced by the farmers, if performed on this population, would fail to improve overall yield. The comparison of means between progenies in relation to fruit and seed characteristics is found in Table S1. In the individual analysis of the means by the Scott–Knott test, it can be observed that each characteristic has a different response.
Path analysis was performed to investigate the direct and indirect effects of traits that were significantly correlated with seed production (i.e., TNS, TWS, and MWF) (Table 4) [13,29]. The TWF had a strong, positive, and direct effect on TWS (0.725; Table 4), which indicated that indirect selection would be successful. Interestingly, Umamaheswari et al. [30] (also based on path analysis) found that the TWF of J. curcas was valuable for the indirect selection seed and oil yield.

3.2. Selection Gains in Sacha-Inchi Progenies

The direct selection gains for TNF (25%) and TWF (20%) were similar to the indirect gain for TWS (23%; Table 5). Therefore, the improvement program may increase the total weight (g) of seeds per plant by 23% during the first selection cycle (one year) by simply increasing TNF and TWF. This result differs from the recommendation of Valente et al. [11], who proposed that more productive progenies could be produced by simultaneously increasing TNS, TNF, and TWF. In the present study, the results indicate that the selection of progenies that produce more seeds may be achieved indirectly by evaluating TNF or TWF, as previously mentioned.
Direct selection for increasing TWS, TNF, and TWF reduced indirect gains in MWF under different selection intensities (Table 6), which agrees with the negative correlations observed among the traits. Even though the objective of selection is to increase seed production, high selection intensity could result in an undesired reduction of genetic diversity in the improved population [9]. In contrast, the use of low selection intensity (i) in the first cycle of selection could increase the inclusion of genotypes that are divergent in other traits (Table 6). An i of 25% (three progenies) allowed the selection progenies with significantly smaller fruits (genotype: mean ± standard deviation, Aucaloma = 6.83 ± 0.38 g) and very small fruits (Cuzco = 6.02 ± 0.55 and Dos de Mayo = 6.31 ± 0.12 g), whereas an i of 42% (five progenies) allowed the selection of progenies with large fruits (Shanao = 8.05 ± 0.36 g), medium fruits (AM7 = 7.33 ± 0.23), small fruits (Aucaloma), and very small fruits (Cuzco; Scott–Knott test, p < 0.05 for each comparison). The low selection intensity used in the present study (42%) was viable because the population was small. Future studies should assess other traits, such as unsaturated fatty acid content [7,8,31,32,33] and disease resistance [34,35,36], that are relevant to the industry and farmers.
The Dos de Mayo, Shanao, Cuzco, Aucaloma, and AM7 progenies were selected based on either TNF or TWF. These progenies can be multiplied utilizing cuttings in a greenhouse with sub-irrigation [37]. After saplings (cuttings) are formed, they can be planted in isolation. The seeds produced in such a clonal garden via open pollination can then be supplied as improved seeds to producers, thus establishing an improved population [14].
After the recombination of the five selected progenies, the next generation (improved population) is expected to yield 1.122 g·plant−1 or 1.246 kg·ha−1 of dry fruits (calculation based on 1111 plants.ha−1; Table 5). These predictions are greater than those of Valente et al. [11], who selected ten progenies, managed them in the same area, under the same conditions used in the present study, and reported a mean yield of 763 g·plant−1, or 847 kg.ha−1. Plant breeding for yield and quality traits in fruits is complex due to the polygenic nature of these traits and the existence of genetic correlations among them [38,39,40,41].
The five accessions selected in this study exhibit genetic variations that are useful for selection. Previous molecular genetic analysis of accessions from the San Martin region of Peru (Dos de Mayo, Shanao, and Aucaloma) also indicated the existence of genetic variations [3] and that the Dos de Mayo accession was distinct from the Shanao and Aucaloma accessions. Genetic variation in the Cuzco accession was also reported by Rodriguez et al. [2].
For dry seed commercialized production, the genetic gain with a selection index of 42% of the progenies was estimated at 23%. This corresponds to 118 kg ha−1 (population of 1111 ha−1). In this present study, the oil content in the seeds was not evaluated. Therefore, it was not possible to estimate the exact productivity of the oil. Seed productivity characteristics are of interest to agriculture and agroindustry has an indirect related interest regarding buying seeds from producers but selling the oil. Yang et al. [6] verified a positive correlation between seed and oil productivity. Consequently, it can be inferred that more productive varieties are of greater interest to the farmer and agroindustry. Study of fatty acid composition will also be able to differentiate the progenies.

4. Conclusions

The selection of sacha-inchi progenies with greater total number of fruits per plant and total weight of fruits per plant provides greater indirect genetic gain in progenies, which will produce greater total weight of seeds per plant. The Dos de Mayo, Shanao, Cuzco, Aucaloma, and AM7 progenies were superior regarding the total weight of seeds. Moreover, they could be used to establish open-pollinated clonal systems to effectuate an improved population. Due to the absence of named sacha-inchi cultivars, progeny-level mass selection can be used to initiate an enhancement program and provide seeds of high genetic quality to cultivation areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae8110988/s1, Table S1: Comparison of means between 12 Plukenetia volubilis progenies in relation to fruits and seed characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.M.D., F.C.M.C., R.L. and M.T.G.L.; methodology, J.P.M.D., R.L., M.S.F.V., C.M. and M.T.G.L.; software, M.S.F.V. and S.F.R.; validation, F.A.R. and M.P.; formal analysis, F.A.R. and M.P.; investigation, J.P.M.D. and F.C.M.C.; resources, F.A.R. and S.F.R.; data curation, F.C.M.C. and C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.G.L.; writing—review and editing, C.M., A.V.d.A., M.P. and M.T.G.L.; supervision, A.V.d.A. and R.L.; project administration, M.T.G.L. and F.C.M.C.; funding acquisition, M.T.G.L., F.C.M.C. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research has the financial support of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) process n◦ 310307/2018-0. This study was financed in part by the Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) grant 003/2022/PRPGP and Universidade Federal do Amazonas. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Jhon Paul Mathews Delgado was supported by a scholarship from CAPES. Carlos Henrique Salvino Gadelha Meneses (process n◦ 313075/2021-2) and Maria Teresa Gomes Lopes (process n◦ 310307/2018-0) were supported by fellowships from CNPq. We thank Gregory P. Burke, a native English speaker, who provided linguistic advice and grammatical corrections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gillespie, L.J. A Synopsis of Neotropical Plukenetia (Euphorbiaceae) Including Two New Species. Syst. Bot. 1993, 18, 575–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodriguez, A.; Corazon-Guivin, M.; Cachique, D.; Mejía, K.; Del Castillo, D.; Jean-François, R.; García-Dávila, C. Differentiation morphological and by Inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) of species of genus Plukenetia (Euphorbiaceae) from Peruvian Amazon: Suggestion for a new species. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2010, 17, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vasek, J.; Čepkova, H.P.; Viehmannova, I.; Ocelak, M.; Huansi, C.D.; Vejl, P. Dealing with AFLP genotyping errors to reveal genetic structure in Plukenetia volubilis (Euphorbiaceae) in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Del Castillo, A.M.R.; Gonzalez-Aspajo, G.; Sanchez-Marquez, M.F.; Kodahl, N. Ethnobotanical Knowledge in the Peruvian Amazon of the Neglected and Underutilized Crop Sacha Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.). Econ. Bot. 2019, 73, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodrigues, P.H.V.; Bordignon, S.R.; Ambrosano, G.M.B. Horticultural performance of in vitro propagated plants of sacha inchi. Cienc. Rural 2014, 44, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yang, C.; Jiao, D.Y.; Geng, Y.J.; Cai, C.T.; Cai, Z.Q. Planting density and fertilisation independently affect seed and oil yields in Plukenetia volubilis L. plants. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chirinos, R.; Zuloeta, G.; Pedreschi, R.; Mignolet, E.; Larondelle, Y.; Campos, D. Sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis): A seed source of polyunsaturated fatty acids, tocopherols, phytosterols, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1732–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamaker, B.R.; Valles, C.; Gilman, R.; Hardmeier, R.M.; Clark, D.; Garcia, H.H.; Gonzales, A.E.; Kohlstad, I.; Castro, M.; Valdivia, R.; et al. Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Profiles of the Inca Peanut (Plukenetia volubilis). Cereal Chem. 1992, 69, 461–463. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kodahl, N. Sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) from lost crop of the Incas to part of the solution to global challenges? Planta 2020, 251, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Valente, M.S.F.; Lopes, M.T.G.; Chaves, M.F.C.; Pantoja, C.M.; Sousa, G.F.M.; Chagas, E.A. Molecular genetic diversity and mating system in sacha inchi progenies. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2017, 47, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Valente, M.S.F.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Lopes, M.T.G.; OKA, J.M.; Rodrigues, R.A.F. Crop yield, genetic parameter estimation and selection of sacha inchi in central Amazon. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2017, 47, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Falconer, D.S.; Mackay, T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. In Harlow Essex UK Longmans Green; Pearson: Essex, UK, 1996; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cruz, C.D.; Regazzi, A.J.; Carneiro, P.C.S. Modelos Biométricos Aplicados AO Melhoramento Genético, 1st ed.; UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2012; ISBN 9788572694339. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornelius, J.P.; Clement, C.R.; Weber, J.C.; Sotelo-Montes, C.; Van Leeuwen, J.; Ugarte-Guerra, L.J.; Ricse-Tembladera, A.; Arévalo-López, L. The trade-off between genetic gain and conservation in a participatory improvement programme: The case of peach palm (Bactris gasipaes (Kunth)). For. Trees Livelihoods 2006, 16, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van Leeuwen, J.; Lleras-Pérez, E.; Clement, C.R. Field genebanks may impede instead of promote crop development: Lessons of failed genebanks of “promising” Brazilian palms. Agrociencia 2005, 9, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alves, S.R.M.; Lopes, R.; Meneses, C.; Valente, M.S.F.; Martins, C.C.; Ramos, S.F.; Oliveira, I.; de Jesus Pinto Fraxe, T.; Costa, L.; Lopes, M.T.G. Morpho-Agronomic Characterization, Sample Size, and Plot Size for the Evaluation of Capsicum chinense Genotypes. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moreira, A.; Fagueria, N.K. Potential of Brazilian Amazon Soils for Food and Fiber Production. Dyn. Soil Dyn. Plant 2008, 2, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fisch, G.; Marenco, J.A.; Nobre, C.A. The climate of Amazonia—A review. Acta Amaz. 1999, 28, 101–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cruz, C.D. GENES—A Software Package for Analysis in Experimental Statistics and Quantitative Genetics. Acta Scientiarum. Agron. 2013, 35, 271–276. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cruz, C.D.; Regazzi, A.J.; Carneiro, P.C.S. Modelos Biométricos Aplicados AO Melhoramento Genético, 3rd ed.; UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2014; p. 668. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pimentel-Gomes, F. Curso de Estatística Experimental, 15th ed.; FEALQ: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2009; p. 451. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cardinal-McTeague, W.M.; Wurdack, K.J.; Sigel, E.M.; Gillespie, L.J. Seed size evolution and biogeography of Plukenetia (Euphorbiaceae), a pantropical genus with traditionally cultivated oilseed species. BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zareei, E.; Karami, F.; Aryal, R.; Saed-Moucheshi, A. Genotypic by phenotypic interaction affects the heritability and relationship among quantity and quality traits of strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa). N. Zeal. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2022, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Resende, M.D.V.; Duarte, J.B. Precisão e controle de qualidade em experimentos de avaliação de cultivares. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2007, 37, 182–194. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nascimento, M.F.; do Rêgo, E.R.; do Nascimento, N.F.F.; da Silva Leite, P.S.; Finger, F.L.; Bruckner, C.H.; do Rêgo, M.M. Heritability of morpho-agronomic traits in ornamental pepper. Crop. Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mai, T.T.P.; Hardner, C.M.; Alam, M.M.; Henry, R.J.; Topp, B.L. Phenotypic Characterisation for Growth and Nut Characteristics Revealed the Extent of Genetic Diversity in Wild Macadamia Germplasm. Agriculture 2021, 11, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moreira, P.C.; de Rezende, J.C.A.; Porto, A.C.D.M.; Nadaleti, D.H.S.; Gonçalves, F.M.A.; Carvalho, G.R.; Botelho, C.E. Progeny Selection to Develop a Sustainable Arabica Coffee Cultivar. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Freitas, R.G.; Dias, L.A.S.; Cardoso, P.M.R.; Evaristo, A.B.; Silva, M.F.; Araújo, N.M. Diversity and genetic parameter estimates for yield and its components in Jatropha curcas L. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, e15017540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, C.C. Path Analysis—A Primer; The Boxwood Press: Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  30. Umamaheswari, D.; Paramathma, M.; Manivannan, N. Association analysis between oil yield and its component characters in Jatropha. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2009, 1, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, C.; Lu, W.; Wen, Q.; Xu, Z.; Long, W. Germplasm characteristics of Plukenetia volubilis var. Brazilian and its productive performance after introduction into Yuanjiang Dry-Hot Valley of Yunnan, China. Bot. Res. 2015, 4, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, S.; Zhu, F.; Kakuda, Y. Sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.): Nutritional composition, biological activity, and uses. Food Chem. 2018, 265, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lima, B.T.M.; Takahashi, N.S.; Tabata, Y.A.; Hattori, R.S.; Ribeiro, G.D.; Moreira, R.G. Balanced omega-3 and -6 vegetable oil of Amazonian sacha inchi act as LC-PUFA precursors in rainbow trout juveniles: Effects on growth and fatty acid biosynthesis. Aquaculture 2019, 509, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, L.Y.; Chen, P.; Guo, L.J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, G.F.; DU, Q.J.; Huang, J.S. First report of vine wilt disease caused by Fusarium solani on sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in China. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chai, X.; Yang, Z.; Fu, Q.; Pan, Z.; Tang, M.; Li, C.; Xu, F. First report of root and basal stem rot in sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) caused by Fusarium oxysporum in China. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, J. First Report of Colletotrichum siamense causing stem tip dieback of sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Solsol, H.R.; Mesen, M. Efecto del ácido indolbutírico y tipo de estaquilla en el enraizamiento de sacha inchi (plukenetia volubilis L.). Agron. Costarricense 2010, 34, 259–267. [Google Scholar]
  38. Diel, M.N.; Olivoto, T.; Krysczun, D.K.; Giacomini, B.S.; Lúcio, A.D.; Zamban, D.T.; Pinheiro, M.V.M.; Schmidt, D. Relationship between morpho-agronomic traits in tomato hybrids. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 2019, 13, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chavarría-Perez, L.M.; Giordani, W.; Dias, K.O.G.; Costa, Z.P.; Ribeiro, C.A.M.; Benedetti, A.R.; Cauz-Santos, L.A.; Pereira, G.S.; Rosa, J.R.B.F.; Garcia, A.A.F.; et al. Improving yield and fruit quality traits in sweet passion fruit: Evidence for genotype by environment interaction and selection of promising genotypes. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Nogueira, B.B.A.P.; Mendes, D.S.; Mendes, R.B.; Pimenta, S.; Pereira, M.C.T.; Azevedo, A.M.; Nietsche, S. Selection in half-sib progenies of Annona squamosa L.: An important step in the development of new cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 302, 111173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, L.; Gao, C.; Xie, J.; Qiu, J.; Deng, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Liao, D.; Deng, C. Fruit economic characteristics and yields of 40 superior Camellia oleifera Abel plants in the low-hot valley area of Guizhou Province, China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Size of fruits and seeds in 12 sacha-inchi accessions. A—Shanao, B—Novo Horizonte, C—Aucaloma, D—Ponto Renato, E—Cuzco, F—Dos de Mayo, G—João Guerra, H—São Pedro, I—AM13, J—AM7, K—AM17, L—AM21.
Figure 1. Size of fruits and seeds in 12 sacha-inchi accessions. A—Shanao, B—Novo Horizonte, C—Aucaloma, D—Ponto Renato, E—Cuzco, F—Dos de Mayo, G—João Guerra, H—São Pedro, I—AM13, J—AM7, K—AM17, L—AM21.
Horticulturae 08 00988 g001
Table 1. Description of the Plukenetia volubilis progenies’ names in the study, source location, and geographic coordinates.
Table 1. Description of the Plukenetia volubilis progenies’ names in the study, source location, and geographic coordinates.
ProgeniesSource LocationGeographic Coordinates
Novo HorizonteBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 22′ 45.5″ S, 70° 00′ 28.6″ W
CuzcoBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 23′ 03.6″ S, 70° 00′ 38.4″ W
AucalomaBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 22′ 45.5″ S, 70° 00′ 28.6″ W
São PedroBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 24′ 03.3″ S, 70° 01′ 06.8″ W
ShanaoBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 22′ 45.5″ S, 70° 00′ 28.6″ W
Ponto RenatoBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 23′ 15.3″ S, 70° 01′ 00.3″ W
Dos de MayoBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 30′ 03.7″ S, 69° 56′ 04.9″ W
João GuerraBenjamin Constant, AM, Brazil4° 24′ 46.4″ S, 70° 03′ 14.0″ W
AM7Careiro, AM, Brazil3° 31′ 45.0″ S 59° 49′ 07.9″ W
AM13Careiro, AM, Brazil3° 50′ 16.9″ S, 60° 22′ 35.3″ W
AM17Careiro, AM, Brazil3° 50′ 16.9″ S, 60° 22′ 35.3″ W
AM21Careiro, AM, Brazil3° 50′ 16.9″ S, 60° 22′ 35.3″ W
Table 2. Summary of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and genetic parameters for the fruit production and quality traits of 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Table 2. Summary of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and genetic parameters for the fruit production and quality traits of 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
SVDFTNFTWFTNSTWSMWFNSFMWSTWS:TWFSH (Day)
Mean square
Blocks264,6502,878,281957,099978,5170.3600.0010.0020.0031220
Progenies115592 *163,740 *78,157 *67,321 *1.246 *0.035 *0.014 *0.004 *1105 ns
Error2282029,22011,38011,9840.1770.0110.0020.00520
Mean 1329055095107.133.871.010.55212
CVe (%) 22192122635411
Genetic parameters
σ2 g 159144,84022,25918,4430.3570.0080.0040.001198
σ2 f 186454,58026,05222,4400.4150.0120.0050.001371
h2 (%) 858285828667839053
CVg (%) 3023292782667
CVg/CVe 1.391.241.41.241.420.851.271.710.62
SV—sources of variation; DF—degree of freedom; CVe (%)—environmental variation coefficients; σ2 g—genetic variance; σ2 f—phenotypic variance; h2—broad-sense heritability; CVg (%)—coefficient of genetic variation; * significant at p ≤ 0.05, F test; ns not significant at p ≤ 0.05, F test; TNF—total number of fruits per plant; TWF—total weight (g) of fruits per plant; TNS—total number of seeds per plant; TWS—total weight (g) of seeds per plant; MWF—mean weight (g) of fruits; NST—number of seeds per fruit; MWS—mean weight (g) of seeds; TWS:TWF—TWS:TWF ratio; and SH—start of harvest.
Table 3. Genotypic (upper diagonal) and phenotypic (lower diagonal) correlations between fruit production and quality traits in 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Table 3. Genotypic (upper diagonal) and phenotypic (lower diagonal) correlations between fruit production and quality traits in 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
TNFTWFTNSTWSMWFNSFMWSTWS:TWFSH (Day)
TNF 0.97 **0.99 **0.97 **−0.75 **−0.22−0.240.73 **−0.19
TWF0.96 ** 0.97 **0.99 **−0.54−0.22−0.020.68 *−0.33
TNS0.99 **0.96 ** 0.97 **−0.73 **−0.16−0.250.73 **−0.18
TWS0.97 **0.98 **0.97 ** −0.64 *−0.280.000.81 **−0.32
MWF−0.70 *−0.49−0.68 *−0.57 * 0.250.54−0.73 **−0.11
NSF−0.19−0.16−0.12−0.190.26 −0.37−0.300.08
MWS−0.230.03−0.240.000.59 *−0.22 0.10−0.44
TWS:TWF0.67 *0.61 *0.67 *0.73 **−0.68 *−0.14−0.11 −0.22
SH (day)−0.12−0.2−0.12−0.19−0.010.01−0.21−0.21
* Significant at p ≤ 0.01, t-test; ** significant at p ≤ 0.05, t-test; TNF—total number of fruits per plant; TWF—total weight (g) of fruits per plant; TNS—total number of seeds per plant; TWS—total weight (g) of seeds per plant; MWF—mean weight (g) of fruits; NST—number of seeds per fruit; MWS—mean weight (g) of seeds; TWS:TWF—TWS:TWF ratio; and SH—start of harvest.
Table 4. Estimated effects of fruit and seed traits on the total weight and seed weight of plants from 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Table 4. Estimated effects of fruit and seed traits on the total weight and seed weight of plants from 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Fruit and Seed TraitsEffect and Correlation CoefficientStandardized
Coefficients
Total number of fruits per plantDirect effect on total weight (g) of seeds per plant0.046
Indirect effect using total weight (g) of fruits per plant0.711
Indirect effect using total number of seeds per plant0.222
Indirect effect using mean weight (g) of fruits0.006
Total (correlation coefficient)0.985
Total weight (g) of fruits per plantDirect effect on total weight (g) of seeds per plant0.725
Indirect effect using total number of fruits per plant0.045
Indirect effect using total number of seeds per plant0.218
Indirect effect using total weight (g) of fruits per plant0.005
Total (correlation coefficient)0.994
Total number of seeds per plantDirect effect on total weight (g) of seeds per plant0.222
Indirect effect using total number of fruits per plant0.046
Indirect effect using total number of seeds per plant0.714
Indirect effect using mean weight (g) of fruits0.006
Total (correlation coefficient)0.988
Mean weight (g) of fruitsDirect effect on total weight (g) of seeds per plant−0.011
Indirect effect using total number of fruits per plant−0.025
Indirect effect using total weight (g) of fruits per plant−0.286
Indirect effect using total number of seeds per plant−0.116
Total (correlation coefficient)−0.438
Determination coefficient 0.995
Table 5. Direct and indirect selection gains of yield traits and fruit quality in 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Table 5. Direct and indirect selection gains of yield traits and fruit quality in 12 sacha-inchi progenies.
Traits SelectedAnswers in TraitsXoXsh2%SGSG %Progenies Selected
TNFTNF1321718534251; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWF90511228217920
TNS5096548512424
TWS5106538211823
MWF7.1296.82486−0.262−4
NST0.5530.576900.0204
TWFTNF1321718534251; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWF90511228217920
TNS5096548512424
TWS5106538211823
MWF7.1296.82486−0.262−4
NST0.5530.576900.0204
TNFTNF1321718534251; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWF90511228217920
TNS5096548512424
TWS5106538211823
MWF7.1296.82486−0.262−4
NST0.5530.576900.0204
TWSTNF1321718534251; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWF90511228217920
TNS5096548512424
TWS5106538211823
MWF7.1296.82486−0.262−4
NST0.5530.576900.0204
MWFTNF13210285−25−192; 3; 8; 9;10
TWF90577282−109−12
TNS50940185−92−18
TWS51041582−78−15
MWF7.1297.695860.4857
NST0.5530.52690−0.025−4
NSTTNF1321588523171; 4; 7; 11; 12
TWF9051017829210
TNS509607858416
TWS510600827414
MWF7.1296.64786−0.414−6
NST0.5530.585900.0295
Xo—initial population average. Xs—average of the selected population. h2—broad-sense heritability. SG—selection gains; progenies: 1—Dos de Mayo; 2—Shanao; 3—São Pedro; 4—Cuzco; 5—AM17; 6—Aucaloma; 7—AM7; 8—AM13; 9—AM21; 10—Ponto Renato; 11—João Guerra; 12—Novo Horizonte. TNF—total number of fruits per plant; TWF—total weight (g) of fruits per plant; TNS—total number of seeds per plant; TWS—total weight (g) of seeds per plant; MWF—mean weight (g) of fruits; NST—number of seeds per fruit; and MWS—mean weight (g) of seeds.
Table 6. Effect of selection intensity on the direct and indirect selection gains of yield traits and mean fruit weight in 12 sacha-inchi progenies. DSG%, direct selection gain; ISG%, indirect selection gain.
Table 6. Effect of selection intensity on the direct and indirect selection gains of yield traits and mean fruit weight in 12 sacha-inchi progenies. DSG%, direct selection gain; ISG%, indirect selection gain.
Traits
Selected
Answers in Traits Selection Intensity
25% (3 Progenies)33% (4 Progenies)42% (5 Progenies)
h2%XoXsGSGS%XoXsSGSG%XoXsSGSG%
TNFTNF85132190493713218142321321713425
TWF82905118423025905115320423905112217920
TWS82510685144285106781382751065311823
MWF867.136.38−0.64−97.136.52−0.53−77.136.82−0.26−4
PS 1; 4; 61; 4; 6; 71; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWFTNF85132190493713218142321321713425
TWF82905118423025905115320423905112217920
TWS82510685144285106781382751065311823
MWF867.136.38−0.64−97.136.52−0.53−77.136.82−0.26−4
PS 1; 4; 61; 4; 6; 71; 2; 4; 6; 7
TWSTNF85132185463513218142321321713425
TWF82905115420423905115320423905112217920
TWS82510690148295106781382751065311823
MWF867.136.41−0.61−97.136.52−0.53−77.136.82−0.26−4
PS 1; 4; 61; 4; 6; 71; 2; 4; 6; 7
MWFTNF85132103−25−19132108−20−15132102−25−19
TWF82905796−90−10905823−67−7905772−109−12
TWS82510421−73−14510444−54−11510415−78−15
MWF867.137.950.70107.137.790.5787.137.690.497
PS 2; 8; 102; 3; 8; 102; 3; 8; 9; 10
Xo—initial population average. Xs—average of the selected population. h2—broad-sense heritability. SG—selection gains; PS—progenies selected: 1—Dos de Mayo; 2—Shanao; 3—São Pedro; 4—Cuzco; 5—AM17; 6—Aucaloma; 7—AM7; 8—AM13; 9—AM21; 10—Ponto Renato; 11—João Guerra; 12—Novo Horizonte. TNF—total number of fruits per plant; TWF—total weight (g) of fruits per plant; TWS—total weight (g) of seeds per plant; MWF—mean weight (g) of fruits.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delgado, J.P.M.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Lopes, R.; Meneses, C.; Valente, M.S.F.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Pasqual, M.; Ramos, S.F.; de Aguiar, A.V.; Lopes, M.T.G. Indirect Selection for Seed Yield in Sacha-Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in Brazil. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110988

AMA Style

Delgado JPM, Chaves FCM, Lopes R, Meneses C, Valente MSF, Rodrigues FA, Pasqual M, Ramos SF, de Aguiar AV, Lopes MTG. Indirect Selection for Seed Yield in Sacha-Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in Brazil. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(11):988. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delgado, Jhon Paul Mathews, Francisco Célio Maia Chaves, Ricardo Lopes, Carlos Meneses, Magno Sávio Ferreira Valente, Filipe Almendagna Rodrigues, Moacir Pasqual, Santiago Ferreyra Ramos, Ananda Virginia de Aguiar, and Maria Teresa Gomes Lopes. 2022. "Indirect Selection for Seed Yield in Sacha-Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in Brazil" Horticulturae 8, no. 11: 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110988

APA Style

Delgado, J. P. M., Chaves, F. C. M., Lopes, R., Meneses, C., Valente, M. S. F., Rodrigues, F. A., Pasqual, M., Ramos, S. F., de Aguiar, A. V., & Lopes, M. T. G. (2022). Indirect Selection for Seed Yield in Sacha-Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) in Brazil. Horticulturae, 8(11), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop