Next Article in Journal
Eustress and Plants: A Synthesis with Prospects for Cannabis sativa Cultivation
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the Nutrient Management of an Apple Orchard by Using Organic-Based Composites Derived from Agricultural Waste
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Beef Manure Economic Value by the Method of Equivalent Green and Mineral Fertilizer Substitution
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Lab to Field: Biofertilizers in the 21st Century
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Hydroponics Nutrient Solution on Quality of Selected Varieties of Potato Minitubers

1
Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University, Egerton 20115, Kenya
2
College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala 7062, Uganda
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(2), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10020126
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 26 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 29 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Horticultural Plant Nutrition, Fertilization, Soil Management)

Abstract

:
Addressing poor seed quality is pivotal for increased potato yields in Kenya. For this to be realized there is a need for nutrient optimization in the hydroponic system. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of nutrient stock solution concentrations on the quality of minitubers produced under a hydroponic system. Two greenhouse experiments were set up at Egerton University, Kenya in 2022. The treatments included three nutrient solution concentrations: 75% (N75), 100% (N100) and 125% (N125) and four potato varieties (Wanjiku, Unica, Shangi and Nyota) grown in a cocopeat substrate hydroponic system. The results indicated that the application of N125 produced minitubers that had significantly higher specific gravity, dry matter, starch, ash and sugar content. Crude protein and phosphorus did not differ significantly with the application of varying nutrient concentrations. The varieties did not differ significantly in the quality parameters except for total sugars where Unica was significantly different from Nyota and Wanjiku while Shangi did not differ from all varieties. Therefore, it will be advisable to apply 125% of the ADC-Molo recommended nutrient stock formulation which should be considered as an effective method of increasing minitubers quality under a hydroponic system.

1. Introduction

Universally, Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is ranked as the third most important food crop and its contribution to achieving food security and nutrition in developing countries has increased steadily over the years [1,2]. Potato has been considered a strategic crop to achieve food security and eradicate poverty under the United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals [3]. Potato has gained an advantage over other crops due to its nutritional value and its ability to adapt to varying climatic conditions [4]. It is a good alternative to cereals due to its high yield potential and high harvest index of above 75% [5]. It is reported to have a better nutrient balance than other vegetables and is the cheapest carbohydrate source [6,7]. Potato is also an important source of essential nutrients, bioactive elements such as vitamins, proteins, phenolics, minerals and naturally occurring anti-nutrients like glycol-alkaloids and nitrates [8]. It has low levels of cholesterol, sodium, antioxidants and fats, making it most suitable for human consumption [9].
Despite the immense potential, certified seed potato production in Kenya faces a number of challenges including a lack of adequate land to practice crop rotation, increased prevalence of pests and diseases, poor crop nutrition and unfavorable weather conditions [10]. Limited seed potato varieties and a shortage of certified seed potatoes have affected the expansion and profitability of the potato industry in Kenya [11]. Currently, seed potato demand stands at 300,000 metric tonnes against the current production of about 2640 metric tonnes [12]. The informal sector has accelerated the adoption of conventional methods of seed potato production which entails the use of soil as a medium for seed multiplication [13]. Though the soil-based seed potato production method is widely used in Kenya, it has a low multiplication rate in addition to encouraging the build-up of tissue-borne viruses, fungi and bacteria [14,15]. To meet the increasing seed potato demand and reduce the risks associated with conventional production methods, it is important to enhance production efficiency within the informal seed production sector. A hydroponic production system has been introduced to increase minituber quantity and produce high-yielding, disease-free minitubers [2].
Seed potato quality is an important aspect to consider in increasing potato productivity [16]. The genomic potential and other characteristics of the potato can only be realized through the use of good quality seed potatoes [17]. Minitubers must exhibit good physiological and nutritional characteristics including specific density, starch, dry matter contents and nutritional compositions which play a vital role in improving the seedlings’ vigor and tuberization capacity of the resultant plants [12]. These tuber qualities are influenced by the amount of nutrient solution applied and the variety used [18,19]. The introduction of a hydroponic production system has been reported to increase minituber production that is free, high yielding and of high quality [2,20]. The composition of nutrient solution for the minituber hydroponic production systems is a key limiting factor in the quality of the minitubers produced [21]. Nutrient management in seed potato production affects the accumulation of dry matter, specific gravity, total protein, sugars, ash content, and starch content [9,22].
Minitubers production is heavily reliant on the supply of nutrients such as potassium, nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and microelements with each nutrient having a specific function for high quality tuber production [23,24,25]. Potatoes demand substantial amounts of nutrients during the growth period and deficient or excessive nutrient application could have detrimental effects on tuber quality [26]. While nutrient requirements for seed potatoes have extensively been investigated [12,21,27,28], information regarding the use of hydroponic systems to produce minitubers in Kenya remains limited. In addition, there is inadequate information on minitubers quality characteristics of the newly released potato varieties [1]. This knowledge gap necessitates the identification of an optimal nutrient solution application regime in order to maintain tuber quality while minimizing production costs [19]. Hence, to address these challenges the present study aims to investigate the influence of nutrient stock solution concentrations on the minitubers quality under a hydroponic system.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Location and Layout

The study was carried out in a polyfilm greenhouse at the Climate and Water Smart Agriculture Center at Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya from September to November 2022. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) arrangement with three replications. The main plot treatments were the Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC)-Molo nutrient formulation which was applied at 75%, 100% and 125% (N75, N100 and N125, respectively) of the recommended concentrations (Table 1) while the subplot treatments entailed four potato varieties (Wanjiku, Nyota, Shangi and Unica) (Table 2).
The experimental area measured 750 cm by 800 cm and each planting trough/plot measured 30 cm by 700 cm. Cocopeat was used as the planting media and was prepared as described by Gbollie et al. [30]. Each planting trough consisted of the four potato varieties, with each variety occupying 150 cm which were planted at a spacing of 15 cm by 15 cm giving a plant population of 20 plantlets per variety. The drip irrigation system with drip emitters spaced at 20 cm intervals and an emitter flow rate of 6 L h−1 was placed at the surface of the cocopeat to supply nutrient solutions in each block. The fertigation system consisted of three 1500 L inlet tanks and three 250 L outlet tanks placed underground to collect excess nutrient solutions through gravity flow. Since the hydroponic system was closed, electric pumps were used to pump the nutrient solutions back to the inlet tanks. The nutrient solutions were monitored daily by measuring the electrical conductivity (EC) using an EC meter (pHep®4 pH-HI98127, Woonsocket, RI, USA) and pH using a pH meter (pHep®4 pH-HI98127, Woonsocket, RI, USA). Sodium hydroxide and phosphoric acid were used to maintain the pH between 5.5–6.5 and EC at 1 mS/cm. Harvesting was conducted 90 days after planting. Crop management practices including pest and disease control were carried out throughout the growing season. The harvested minitubers were cleaned to eliminate any cocopeat using a dry towel before they were taken to the laboratory.

2.2. Data Collection

At harvest, data was collected on minitubers dry matter (TDM), specific gravity (SG), starch content, phosphorus content, total sugars, crude protein (CP) and ash content from randomly selected samples per plot.
Minitubers dry matter was determined by sampling five minitubers from five plants at random from each plot and variety. They were cut into smaller pieces, mixed thoroughly and 200 g per sample were weighed and oven dried at 60 °C for 72 h until a constant weight was achieved. The dry matter weight was recorded and the dry matter percentage was determined using the following equation [31]:
Minitubers   dry   matter   ( % ) = weight   of   sample   after   drying   g initial   weight   of   the   sample × 100
Specific gravity was evaluated using the weight in air and weight in water method as described by Islam et al. [5] where 5 kg of minitubers were selected from each plot and variety and cleaned with running water then weighed in air and then in water. The specific gravity of the minitubers was calculated using the following equation:
Specific   gravity = weight   in   air weight   in   air     weight   in   water .

2.3. Composition Analysis

About 5 kg of minitubers from each treatment were oven-dried at 65 °C for about 48 h and were passed through a 0.5-mm screen using a grinding machine. The ground materials were used in digestion and to determine ash, starch and sugar content. The ash content was determined using the incineration method as explained by Naz et al. [32]. Empty crucibles were weighed (W1) using an electric balance (Ohaus Brainweigh® B1500D Florham Park, NJ, USA) and about 2 g of the sample was placed into the crucible which was weighed (W2). The samples were placed in a muffler furnace for 3 h at 550 ± 10 °C and then in a desiccator for cooling. The crucibles were then reweighed (W3) and the percentage ash content was calculated using the following equation:
Ash   content   ( % ) = W 3   W 1 W 2   W 1     ×   100
Total sugars were determined using the method described by AOAC [33]. About 0.2 g of the sample was placed in a centrifuge test tube and two drops of ethanol solution (80% v/v) and 5 mL of distilled water were added. About 25 mL of hot ethanol (80% v/v) was then added to the sample and vortexed. The samples were left for 5 min to cool and they were centrifuged at 2000× g for 30 min at 4 °C using a centrifuge (Eppendorf 5430RV2.4, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was decanted into a 100 mL volumetric flask and the extraction was repeated by adding 30 mL of hot ethanol and centrifuged for 30 min. Distilled water was used to top up the final volume of 100 mL. About 10 mL of anthrone reagent was placed into the test tubes and then they were heated in a water bath for about 12 min. The samples were then cooled at room temperature. Blanks were prepared using 1 mL water and all the other reagents were added. The samples were then read at 630 nm against the water anthrone reagent blank. Starch content was evaluated according to AOAC [33]. The residue left after sugar extraction was placed in a test tube and 7.5 mL of 52% perchloric acid was added and left for one hour. About 17.5 mL of distilled water was added to the filtrate. One milligram of the extracted filtrate was pipetted and combined with 1 mL of distilled water. Half a milligram of phenol was added and vortexed. This was followed by an addition of 2.5 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid and vortexing. The samples were cooled at room temperature for ten minutes and vortexing was repeated. For blanks, 0.1 mL of water was used and other reagents were added at the same time. The samples were read for absorbance at 510 nm.
Digestion procedure: About 0.5 g of each sample was placed in a digestion flask followed by 5 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid and the Kjeldahl catalyst. The samples were then placed into the digestion chambers and removed once the mixture became clear. The samples were cooled and the digested mixtures were transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask where the distilled water was used to top up the 100 mL mark. The digestion mixture was used to determine crude protein and phosphorus content. Crude protein was evaluated according to AOAC [33] using the Kjeldahl method. About 30 mL of sodium hydroxide (40%) was added to 30 mL of the digested sample and distillation was conducted for about 5 min using the Markham distillation apparatus. Ammonia gas was collected in a conical flask that contained 20 mL of 4% Boric acid solutions, along with a few drops of methyl red indicator. The resulting distillate was subsequently titrated against the standard 0.1 N HCL solution until a pink color was observed. A blank was also prepared using the above procedure and the crude protein percentage was determined using the conversion factor of 6.5. Phosphorus was determined calorimetrically as described by Okalebo et al. [34]. About 2.5 mL of the digested mixture was pipetted into a 50 mL volumetric flask and 10 mL of Ammonium vanado-molybdate reagent was added. The volumetric flask was filled to the 50 mL mark using distilled water and the sample was left to stand for 10 min. A blank was prepared using the reagents and 40 mL distilled water. The samples were then read at 430 nm using a spectrophotometer.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were checked for normality and appropriate transformation was conducted to achieve normal distribution. The results were subjected to Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software version 9.4. The means of the treatments that differed significantly were separated using Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test at 5% p-value. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the quality parameters (starch, sugars, crude protein, dry matter, ash content, specific gravity and phosphorus).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Nutrient Stock Solution Concentrations on Minitubers Dry Matter, Specific Gravity and Starch Content

Tuber dry matter (TDM) was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected by the application of varying nutrient stock solution concentrations (NSSC) (Table 3). Increasing NSSC from 75% to 125% of the ADC-Molo formulation increased the TDM from 17.89% to 24.90%. In previous studies [12,35], increasing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content increased the photosynthetic rates which increased the vegetative growth ultimately leading to high DM content. Application of high nitrogen content positively influences the photosynthesis efficiency by increasing the interception rate of radiation and photons which results in the increase in partitioning of the TDM, tuber bulking and ultimately high tuber yield formation [24]. According to Akoto et al. [9] increasing P content resulted in increased TDM due to its functions on tuber development, i.e., it plays a role in cell division and synthesis, and tuber starch storage thereby increasing both the tuber size and DM%. The results showed that there were no significant (p < 0.05) differences in the TDM among the potato varieties grown. The minitubers dry matter ranged from 20.79% to 21.19%. These results are in line with the National potato council of Kenya [29] where all varieties have a DM of ≥20% (Table 3).
Specific gravity (SG) It is regarded as one of the crucial indicators for potato quality as it is positively correlated with starch content and tuber dry matter [27]. In this study, SG was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) influenced by the application of nutrient stock solution concentrations but not variety and interactions between NSSC and variety. Evaluating SG using seed potatoes is critical as it ensures the selection of seeds with the specific qualities and attributes desired by potato growers, processors and consumers. Specific gravity can be influenced by the nutrient compositions [36]. In this study, N125 reported a high SG of 1.18 as compared to N100 (1.09) and N75 (1.06) (Table 3). The results are similar to the findings of Bekele et al. [37] who noted that increasing nitrogen, phosphorus and phosphorus fertilizers rates led to high SG. There were no significant differences between the potato varieties with the application of varying nutrient concentrations. It was similarly reported that the specific gravity of Shangi and Unica did not differ significantly with the application of different phosphorus fertilizer rates [9]. A specific gravity of greater than 1.10 reported indicates that the varieties are highly suitable for the processing of dehydrated and fried products. These characteristics boost high product recovery rates, reduce oil absorption and lower energy consumption during processing, and generally result in superior quality of fried products [1].
Starch is the primary component of the tuber dry matter and accounts for about 50–80% of the total DM [38]. Increasing nutrient concentrations significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased starch content with N125 reporting 15.59% and N75 reporting 11.69% (Table 3). These results could be attributed to the increase in potassium application which increased the activation of the starch synthase enzymes responsible for starch synthesis [24,39]. Thus, it is possible that our observation could be linked to the K increase in the nutrient solutions. Additionally, it was reported that increasing phosphorus application increased the storage of starch due to its role in the cell division and synthesis, and enzyme activation which are involved in starch synthesis, i.e., fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase [35]. The potato varieties did not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) differ in the starch content; while the interaction between NSSC and variety was also not significant (p ≤ 0.05).

3.2. Influence of Nutrient Stock Solution Concentrations on Ash, Crude Protein, Total Sugars and Phosphorus Contents of Minitubers

Ash content Increasing the nutrient stock solution concentrations (NSSC) significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected the ash content. However, no significant (p < 0.05) interactions were observed between the varieties as well as the interaction between NSSC and varieties. The ash content in N125 (7.12%) NSSC was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than N100 (5.92%) and N75 (5.83%) (Table 4). The increase in ash content with an increase in nutrient concentration may be due to the higher availability of mineral nutrients in the media hence higher absorption by the apical rooted cuttings [40]. Similarly, it was reported that the ash content of potato tubers increased with an increase in fertilizer application [41]. The varieties had ash content ranging from 5.77% to 6.89%.
Crude protein (CP) The potato nutritional value is determined by the crude protein content [42]. No significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences were observed with the application of varying nutrient stock solution concentrations (NSSC), potato varieties (Table 4) and the interaction between NSSC and variety. The crude protein ranged from 6.94% to 8.08% following the application of NSSC and ranged from 7.15% to 8.17% for the varieties. Similarly, it was reported that potato crude protein was not significantly different with the application of varying nutrient levels and varieties [1,8,26,32].
Phosphorus The phosphorus content did not differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05) with the application of nutrient stock solution concentrations and among the varieties (Table 4). The results concur with a study conducted by Adamovičs et al. [42] where there was no difference in phosphorus content with the application of varying fertilizer rates. The high P content in N125 could be attributed to the high phosphorus concentration in the nutrient solution which increased P uptake in the tubers [43,44]. Shangi recorded the highest value (0.64%) followed by Nyota (0.63%), Unica (0.62%) and Wanjiku (0.61%). There was no significant (p ≤ 0.05) difference in the NSSC and variety interaction.
Sugar content showed an increasing trend with an increase in nutrient stock solution concentrations (Figure 1). Treatment N125 had a sugar content of 37.97% which was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) different from N100 (12.14%) and N75 (11.36%). Increasing nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers application was reported to increase the total sugar content in potato tuber [45]. There were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in the sugar content between the potato varieties. Unica (31.51%) produced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher sugar content as compared to Nyota (15.80%) and Wanjiku (17.50%) but was not significantly different from Shangi (18.58%) as presented in Figure 2. Sugar content is a heritable character that is affected by a variety, of environmental and cultural practices such as nutrition [5,6].

3.3. Correlation Analysis

A positive correlation of minitubers quality parameters, i.e., dry matter (TDM) with specific gravity (SG), starch content, phosphorus, ash and sugar content were observed as shown in Table 5. However, a negative correlation was reported between crude protein and all other parameters. A high positive correlation was observed between TDM, SG (0.67 ***) and starch content (0.82 ***). As the specific gravity of the minitubers increased, seed starch content and TDM increased. Previous studies have reported high correlations between SG, TDM and starch content [1,6]. An important seed potato quality is high starch and dry matter content which were positively correlated to specific gravity. Specific gravity is used to estimate tuber dry matter content in determining the better processing quality of the tubers [5]. Starch content, dry matter, specific gravity, and sugar content correlations depend on nutrient rates [12].

4. Conclusions

The results of the current study showed that increasing the nutrient stock solution concentrations from 75% to 125% of the ADC Molo nutrient formulation increased minituber quality parameters, i.e., starch, sugars, dry matter, crude protein, phosphorus, specific gravity and ash content which could contribute to quality potato production. Considering the superiority of the varieties, all varieties did not differ significantly in all parameters apart from sugars where Unica had high content as compared to Nyota and Wanjiku. Understanding the role of adequate nutrient supply in quality seed production should be taken into account. Therefore, it is recommended to apply 125% of ADC-Molo nutrient formulation for optimal minitubers quality. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the higher nutrient concentration may not necessarily translate into lower production costs. Further research is recommended to evaluate the growth and yield performance of minitubers produced under varying nutrient stock solution concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C.W., A.M.K. and A.M.O.; methodology, W.C.W., A.M.K., S.G. and T.O.; software, W.C.W.; validation, S.G. and T.O.; formal analysis, S.G. and T.O.; investigation, S.G. and T.O.; resources, S.G. and T.O.; data curation, T.O.; writing—original draft preparation, W.C.W., T.O., S.G. and A.M.K.; writing—review and editing, W.C.W., A.M.K., S.G., T.O. and A.M.O. visualization T.O. and S.G.; supervision, A.M.K., A.M.O., S.G. and T.O.; project administration, T.O.; funding acquisition: T.O.; W.C.W., A.M.K., S.G. and A.M.O. contributed to the design and implementation of the research. T.O. contributed in laboratory analysis and results interpretation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientist in Crop Improvement for Food Security in Africa (SCIFSA) at Makerere University and MasterCard Foundation through the Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM) and Transforming African Agricultural Universities to meaningfully contribute to Africa’s growth and development (TAGDev) program at Egerton University, Kenya.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at Makerere University for using their laboratory and equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gikundi, E.N.; Sila, D.N.; Orina, I.N.; Buzera, A.K. Physico-chemical properties of selected irish potato varieties grown in Kenya. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2021, 15, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wambugu, W.; Opiyo, O.; Githengu, S. Rapid multiplication techniques in seed potato production in Kenya: Prospects, opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the Egerton University 14th Biennial International Conference, Nakuru, Kenya, 23–25 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amare, T.; Bazie, Z.; Alemu, E.; Alemayehu, B.; Tenage, A.; Kerebh, B.; Taye, Y.; Awoke, A.; Feyisa, T.; Kidanu, S. Yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) increased by more than two-folds through nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in the highlands of North-Western Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mystkowska, I.; Zarzecka, K.; Ginter, A.; Gugała, M.; Sikorska, A. Total and protein nitrogen content in potato tubers under the influence of various care and nutrition methods with the use of biostimulants. J. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 24, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Islam, M.; Naznin, S.; Naznin, A.; Uddin, N.; Amin, N.; Rahman, M.; Monirul, M.; Tipu, H.; Alsuhaibani, A.M. Dry matter, starch content, reducing sugar, color and crispiness are key prameters of potatoes required for chip processing. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das, S.; Mitra, B.; Saha, A.; Mandal, S.; Paul, P.K.; El-Sharnouby, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Maitra, S.; Hossain, A. Evaluation of quality parameters of seven processing type potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars in the Eastern Sub-Himalayan Plains. Foods 2021, 10, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Islam, M.R.; Nahar, B.S. Effect of organic farming on nutrient uptake and quality of potato. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2012, 5, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wadas, W. Nutritional value and sensory quality of new potatoes in response to silicon application. Agriculture 2023, 13, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akoto, E.M.; Othieno, C.O.; Ochuodho, J.O. Influence of phosphorus fertilizer on potato seed production in acid soils in Kenya. Sustain. Agric. Res. 2020, 9, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF). The National Potato Strategy 2016–2020; Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF): Nairobi, Kenya, 2016; pp. 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaguongo, W.; Maingi, G.; Barker, I.; Nganga, N.; Guenthner, J. The value of seed potatoes from four systems in Kenya. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 91, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kingori, G.G.; Nyamori, A.J.; Khasungu, I.D. Optimization of seed potato specific density, starch and dry matter contents and tuberization capacity of resultant plants through integrated irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorus management. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 3, 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mbiyu, M.W.; Muthoni, J.; Kabira, J.; Elmar, G.; Muchira, C.; Pwaipwai, P.; Ngaruiya, J.; Otieno, S.; Onditi, J. Use of aeroponics technique for potato (Solanum tuberosum) minitubers production in Kenya. Int. J. Hortic. For. 2012, 1, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  14. Janssens, S.R.M.; Wiersema, S.G.; Goos, H.; Wiersma, W. The Value Chain for Seed and Ware Potatoes in Kenya: Opportunities for Development; Wageningen University & Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 13–80. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lemma, T.; Chindi, A.; Wgiorgis, G.; Solomon, A.; Shunka, E.; Seid, E. Accelerating seed potato production by using rapid multiplication systems in Ethiopia. Open Sci. J. 2018, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Byarugaba, A.A.; John, K.; Aheisibwe, R.A.; Barekye, A. Bridging the gap in quality and quantity of seed potatoes through farmer managed screen houses in Uganda. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 11, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tessema, L.; Chindi, A.; Giorgis, G.W.; Solomon, A.; Shunka, E.; Seid, E. Determination of nutrient solutions for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seed production under aeroponics production system. Open Agric. 2017, 12, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ebúrneo, J.M.; Garcia, E.L.; Paes, T.; De Freitas, E.; Soratto, R.P.; Fernandes, A.M.; Leonel, M. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the characteristics of potato starch. J. Crop Sci. 2018, 12, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petropoulos, S.A.; Fernandes, Â.; Polyzos, N.; Antoniadis, V.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.R. The impact of fertilization regime on the crop performance and chemical composition of potato. Agronomy 2020, 10, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamrani, M.H.; Chegeni, A.R.; Hosseinniya, H.; Kamrani, M.H. Effects of different growing media on yield and growth parameters of potato minitubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2019, 50, 1838–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Filho, J.S.; Cezar, P.; Fontes, R.; Ferreira, J.F.S.; Cecon, P.R.; Crutchfield, E. Optimal Nutrient Solution and Dose for the Yield of Nuclear Seed Potatoes under Aeroponics. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, Z.H.; Mu, T.H.; Zhang, R.F.; Sun, Q.H.; Xu, Y.W. Nutritional evaluation of different cultivars of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from China by grey relational analysis (GRA) and its application in potato steamed bread making. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muthoni, J. Soil fertility situation in potato producing Kenyan highlands case of KALRO-Tigoni. Int. J. Hortic. 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koch, M.; Naumann, M.; Thiel, H.; Gransee, A.; Pawelzik, E. The importance of nutrient management for potato production part I: Plant nutrition and tuber quality. Potato Res. 2020, 63, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zewide, I.; Mohammed, A.; Tadesse, S.T. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) growth and tuber quality, soil nitrogen and phosphorus content as affected by different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus at Masha district in southwestern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Öztürk, E.; Kavurmac, Z.; Kara, K.; Polat, T. The effects of different nitrogen and Phosphorus rates on some quality traits of potato. Potato Res. 2010, 53, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohammed, W. Specific gravity, dry matter content, and starch content of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties cultivated in Eastern Ethiopia. East Afr. J. Sci. 2016, 10, 87–102. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zainaldeen, M.A.; Abdul Rasool, I.J. Response of growth and yield of true potato seed plants to foliar application with organic nutrients. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Al-Qaim, Iraq, 23 November 2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. National Potato Council of Kenya (NPCK). Potato Variety Catalogue 2019; National Potato Council of Kenya (NPCK): Nairobi, Kenya, 2019; pp. 1–80. Available online: http://varieties.potato.org.uk/varieties/view/Accord (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  30. Gbollie, S.N.; Mwonga, S.M.; Kibe, A.M. Effects of calcium nitrate levels and soaking durations on cocopeat nutrient content. J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 2021, 10, 372–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Agle, W.M.; Woodbury, G.W. Specific gravity-dry matter relationship and reducing sugar changes affected by potato variety, production area and storage. Am. Potato J. 1968, 45, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naz, F.; Ali, A.; Iqbal, Z.; Akhtar, N.; Multan, T. Effect of different levels of NPK fertilizers on the proximate compositon of potato crop at Abbottabad. J. Agric. 2011, 27, 353–356. [Google Scholar]
  33. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis in Association of Official Agricultural Chemists; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  34. Okalebo, J.R.; Gathua, K.W.; Paul, L.W. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis: A Working Manual, 2nd ed.; Sacred Africa: Nairobi, Kenya, 2002; Volume 21, pp. 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernandes, A.M.; Soratto, R.P.; Moreno, L.D.; Evangelista, R.M. Effect of phosphorus nutrition on quality of fresh tuber of potato cultivars. Soil Plant Nutr. 2015, 74, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hasnat, A.; Solaiman, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Suvra, T. Yield, dry matter, specific gravity and color of three Bangladeshi local potato cultivars as influenced by stage of maturity. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bekele, D.; Abera, G.; Gobena, A. Effects of chemical fertilizer types and rates on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Assosa, Western Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 14, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  38. Duan, W.; Zhang, H.; Xie, B.; Wang, B.; Zhang, L. Impacts of nitrogen fertilization rate on the root yield, starch yield and starch physicochemical properties of the sweet potato cultivar Jishu 25. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e221351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. El-Hadidi, E.; Ewais, M.; Shehata, A. Fertilization effects on potato yield and quality. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng. 2017, 8, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gichuhi, P.N.; Kpomblekou-a, K.; Bovell-benjamin, A.C. Nutritional and physical properties of organic Beauregard sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.)] as influenced by broiler litter application rate. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nwite, J.C. Enhancing soil fertility status, sweet potato yield and tuber nutrient composition through different manure sources in SouthEastern Nigeria. Arch. Curr. Res. Int. 2016, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Adamovičs, A.; Poiša, L.; Antypova, L. The efficiency of using alternative fertilizers in potato plantations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tarnovo, Bulgaria, 16 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fernandes, A.M.; Soratto, R.P. Nutrition, dry matter accumulation and partitioning and phosphorus use efficiency of potato grown at different phosphorus levels in nutrient solution. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 2012, 36, 1528–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Misgina, N.A. Effect of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rates on yield and yield component of potato (Solanum tubersum L,) at K/Awlaelo, Tigray, Ethiopia. Food Sci. Qual. Manag. 2016, 48, 60–69. [Google Scholar]
  45. Xing, Y.; Niu, X.; Wang, N.; Jiang, W.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X. The correlation between soil nutrient and potato quality in loess plateau of China based on PLSR. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of nutrient stock solution concentrations on the minituber sugar content.
Figure 1. Effect of nutrient stock solution concentrations on the minituber sugar content.
Horticulturae 10 00126 g001
Figure 2. Effect of potato apical rooted cuttings varieties on the sugar content.
Figure 2. Effect of potato apical rooted cuttings varieties on the sugar content.
Horticulturae 10 00126 g002
Table 1. Nutrient concentrations compositions.
Table 1. Nutrient concentrations compositions.
Nutrient CompositionsKH2PO4MgSO4Microsol-BIron
(Fe-EDTA)
KNO3Ca(NO3)2
75%25.500 g45.750 g2.250 g3.375 g8.625 g22.125 g
100% 34.000 g61.000 g3.000 g4.500 g11.500 g29.500 g
125%42.500 g76.250 g3.750 g5.625 g14.375 g36.875 g
Table 2. Description of the potato varieties used [29].
Table 2. Description of the potato varieties used [29].
VarietyDays to MaturityYield
(t ha−1)
Flesh ColorDry MatterUseDormancy
(Months)
Shangi≤9030–40 tCream skin21.4%Chips, table<1
Nyota90–120>40 tWhite-cream skin20%Table, crisp, chips2–3
Wanjiku90–120>40 tWhite-cream skin21%Table, crisp>3
Unica75–100>45 tRed skin21%Chips, table2.5–3.5
Table 3. Effects of nutrient stock solution concentrations and varieties on minitubers dry matter, specific gravity and starch content.
Table 3. Effects of nutrient stock solution concentrations and varieties on minitubers dry matter, specific gravity and starch content.
TreatmentsStarch Content (%)Specific GravityTuber Dry Matter (%)
NSSC
75 (%)11.69 b1.06 b17.89 b
100 (%)12.57 b1.09 b20.98 ab
125 (%)15.59 a1.18 a24.90 a
MSD1.150.065.91
Variety
Shangi13.48 a1.10 a21.19 a
Nyota13.03 a1.11 a20.79 a
Wanjiku13.19 a1.11 a20.83 a
Unica13.44 a1.13 a21.13 a
MSD0.810.062.34
N × VNSNSNS
NSSC: Nutrient Stock Solution Concentrations. NS is not significant (p ≤ 0.05). N: Nutrient. MSD: Minimum significant difference. V: Variety. Means sharing the same letter in column are not significantly different from each other (Tukey Honest significant difference at p ≤ 0.05).
Table 4. Effects of nutrient stock solution concentrations and varieties on minitubers phosphorus content, ash, crude protein and sugar content.
Table 4. Effects of nutrient stock solution concentrations and varieties on minitubers phosphorus content, ash, crude protein and sugar content.
NSSCP Content (%)Ash (%)Crude Protein (%)
75 (%)0.58 a5.83 b6.94 a
100 (%)0.64 a5.92 b7.29 a
125 (%)0.66 a7.12 a8.08 a
MSD0.140.753.29
Variety
Shangi0.64 a6.89 a8.17 a
Nyota0.63 a6.33 a8.13 a
Wanjiku0.62 a6.14 a7.31 a
Unica0.62 a5.77 a7.15 a
MSD0.151.382.60
N × VNSNSNS
NSSC: Nutrient stock solution concentrations. NS is not significant (p ≤ 0.05). N: Nutrient. MSD: Minimum significant difference. P: Phosphorus. V: Variety. Means sharing the same letter in column are not significantly different from each other (Tukey Honest significant difference at p ≤ 0.05).
Table 5. Pearson correlation coefficients for minitubers quality parameters grown under nutrient stock solution concentrations.
Table 5. Pearson correlation coefficients for minitubers quality parameters grown under nutrient stock solution concentrations.
ParametersDry MatterSpecific GravityStarch ContentP
Content
Ash ContentCrude ProteinTotal Sugars
Dry Matter1
Specific Gravity0.67 ***1
Starch Content0.82 ***0.77 ***1
Phosphorus0.042 NS0.259 **0.185 NS1
Ash Content0.43 **0.414 **0.504 **0.085 ***1
Crude Protein−0.026 NS−0.236 NS−0.219 NS0.109 NS−0.050 NS1
Total Sugars0.52 **0.59 **0.71 ***0.185 NS0.41 *−0.134 NS1
P: Phosphorus, NS: Not significant, * Significant (p < 0.05) ** significant (p < 0.01), *** significant (p < 0.001).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wambugu, W.C.; Kibe, A.M.; Opiyo, A.M.; Githeng’u, S.; Odong, T. Influence of Hydroponics Nutrient Solution on Quality of Selected Varieties of Potato Minitubers. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10020126

AMA Style

Wambugu WC, Kibe AM, Opiyo AM, Githeng’u S, Odong T. Influence of Hydroponics Nutrient Solution on Quality of Selected Varieties of Potato Minitubers. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(2):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10020126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wambugu, Winnie Chebet, Anthony M. Kibe, Arnold M. Opiyo, Stephen Githeng’u, and Thomas Odong. 2024. "Influence of Hydroponics Nutrient Solution on Quality of Selected Varieties of Potato Minitubers" Horticulturae 10, no. 2: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10020126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop