Next Article in Journal
Mechanism of Fluorescence Characteristics and Application of Zinc-Doped Carbon Dots Synthesized by Using Zinc Citrate Complexes as Precursors
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Conductivity of Graphene Moiré Superlattices at Small Twist Angles: An Approach-to-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics and Boltzmann Transport Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma-Modified Carbon Materials for Radionuclide Absorption
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimized Adsorptive Desulfurization Using Waste Tire-Derived Carbon

1
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, National Chin Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411030, Taiwan
2
Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 30 March 2025 / Revised: 16 June 2025 / Accepted: 26 June 2025 / Published: 7 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Functionalization: From Synthesis to Applications)

Abstract

The inclusion of adsorption thermodynamic analysis and performance benchmarking with existing adsorbents reinforces both the theoretical significance and practical applicability of this study. The modified rubber-derived carbon demonstrated a remarkably high DBT adsorption capacity of 254.45 mg/g. These results establish it as a promising alternative to conventional materials such as commercial activated carbon, zeolites, and even metal–organic framework materials. In addition to confirming the superior performance of the adsorbent, the findings provide a deeper understanding of the DBT adsorption mechanism and offer a solid scientific basis for large-scale fuel desulfurization applications. This research highlights the potential of transforming end-of-life tire waste into value-added functional materials and contributes to the advancement of sustainable and efficient desulfurization technologies. Future work should focus on optimizing surface functionalization and regeneration strategies to further improve long-term adsorption stability and practical deployment.

1. Introduction

Sulfur has long been an unavoidable impurity in fossil fuels. When burned, sulfur-containing compounds generate sulfur oxides (SOₓ), which contribute to acid rain, smog, and respiratory illnesses [1]. To mitigate these environmental and health hazards, governments worldwide have imposed increasingly stringent regulations on fuel sulfur content. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), for example, has lowered the sulfur cap in marine fuels to 0.5% since 2020, while the European Union and the United States have set even stricter standards for road transportation fuels [2,3]. However, achieving ultra-low sulfur fuels is not a straightforward process, particularly given the increasing reliance on heavier crude oils that contain higher sulfur levels [4].
Traditionally, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) has been the backbone of fuel desulfurization, utilizing high temperatures (300–400 °C) and high-pressure hydrogen (10 atm) to break sulfur-carbon bonds. While effective for removing simple sulfur compounds, HDS struggles with dibenzothiophene (DBT) and its derivatives, which are deeply embedded in the hydrocarbon matrix and resistant to catalytic hydrogenation [2,5]. Deep desulfurization requires more severe reaction conditions and costly catalysts, such as Co-Mo and Ni-Mo, making the process both economically and environmentally burdensome [6]. As a result, researchers have explored alternative methods, including oxidative desulfurization, biodesulfurization, extractive desulfurization, and most notably, adsorptive desulfurization, which offers a promising low-energy, high-selectivity approach [7,8,9,10].
The efficiency of adsorptive desulfurization hinges on a crucial factor: the choice of adsorbent. To effectively capture DBT from fuel, an ideal adsorbent must possess a high surface area, well-developed porosity, and strong chemical affinity for sulfur molecules [11]. Various materials have been studied, including metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [12], zeolites [13], and metal oxide composites [14]. Among them, activated carbon stands out for its tunable surface chemistry, stability, and cost-effectiveness. However, unmodified activated carbon has limited affinity for DBT due to the lack of oxygen-containing functional groups, which are essential for strong adsorption interactions [12,15]. To enhance adsorption performance, researchers have modified activated carbon using different functionalization strategies. For instance, Sentorun-Shalaby et al. improved DBT adsorption by impregnating mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-48 with nickel oxide, which introduced strong metal–sulfur interactions and increased DBT removal efficiency [16]. Similarly, Nejad et al. demonstrated that ordered mesoporous carbon CMK-5 exhibits superior sulfur removal compared to conventional activated carbon due to its well-defined pore structure and tailored surface chemistry [17].
Beyond traditional carbon sources, waste tires have emerged as a promising precursor for activated carbon due to their high carbon content and inherent porosity. Every year, millions of discarded tires accumulate in landfills, creating an environmental crisis. Recent studies have shown that tire-derived activated carbon possesses a highly porous structure, making it suitable for adsorption applications. However, its adsorption efficiency for thiophenic sulfur compounds remains suboptimal, necessitating further chemical modifications to improve performance [18,19,20]. The ability to repurpose waste tires into highly effective desulfurization adsorbents not only addresses the persistent issue of sulfur emissions but also contributes to sustainable waste management.
Each year, approximately 1.5 billion tires reach end-of-life globally, leading to significant waste management concerns [21]. Simultaneously, conventional adsorbents used for fuel purification, such as commercial activated carbons, remain expensive and energy-intensive to produce. Compared with these materials, waste tire-derived carbon offers a sustainable and low-cost alternative. This study not only repurposes tire waste but also optimizes the activation and modification process to achieve high DBT removal performance. These advantages highlight the environmental and economic viability of this method for future fuel desulfurization technologies. Although the valorization of waste tire rubber into carbon-based adsorbents has been previously reported, most studies have focused either on surface area enhancement or elemental sulfur removal under idealized conditions. This study advances the field by systematically optimizing both activation (H3PO4) and functionalization (HNO3) conditions to tailor pore structure and surface chemistry for selective DBT adsorption.
This study explores the transformation of waste tires into high-performance DBT adsorbents through a two-step chemical modification process. First, phosphoric acid activation is used to increase porosity and surface area. Then, nitric acid oxidation introduces oxygen-containing functional groups, such as hydroxyl and phenol, which strengthen DBT adsorption through π–π interactions and hydrogen bonding. The results reveal that the adsorption process follows the Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm model, indicating monolayer adsorption, while kinetic studies confirm a PFO mechanism, suggesting that physisorption plays a dominant role.

2. Results

In the pursuit of an efficient and sustainable adsorbent for fuel desulfurization, the structural and chemical transformation of rubber-derived carbon plays a crucial role. Through a carefully designed process involving sulfuric acid treatment, phosphoric acid activation, and nitric acid modification, we examine how pore structure, surface chemistry, and crystalline properties evolve to enhance DBT adsorption performance.
The untreated rubber-derived carbon, despite possessing some porous characteristics, contained a significant amount of Si, S, and Zn, which were introduced during tire manufacturing. These impurities hinder adsorption performance by blocking active sites and introducing unwanted competing interactions. Upon sulfuric acid treatment, a significant purification effect was observed. EDS (Table 1) revealed a marked reduction in impurities after acid treatment, with the carbon content increasing to 95.68%. This suggests that sulfuric acid effectively removed unwanted elements while retaining the essential carbon framework.
Additionally, XRD analysis (Figure 1) further confirmed the structural transformation induced by acid treatment. The diffraction pattern of the untreated carbon sample displayed several sharp peaks in the 2θ range of 25–60°, which can be attributed to the presence of inorganic impurities such as SiO2, ZnO, and CaCO3, commonly found in tire-derived materials [22]. After sulfuric acid treatment, these crystalline peaks largely disappeared, and the XRD pattern exhibited two broad humps centered around 2θ = 20–30° and 40–50°. This pattern is indicative of an amorphous carbon structure with a turbostratic, graphitic-like arrangement, lacking long-range order [19]. The absence of well-defined peaks implies enhanced structural disorder, which is favorable for adsorption due to the increase in surface heterogeneity and accessible active.
As shown in Figure 2, the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the activated carbon samples exhibit typical Type IV behavior, which is indicative of mesoporous structures. The adsorbed nitrogen quantity increases progressively with activation temperature, reaching a maximum at 650 °C. This trend reflects enhanced surface area and pore development resulting from effective phosphoric acid activation. However, at 750 °C, a significant decrease in nitrogen uptake is observed, suggesting structural degradation and partial pore collapse due to excessive thermal treatment [23].
As shown in Table 2, the activation temperature significantly influenced the pore structure of the resulting carbon adsorbents. The specific surface area increased steadily with a temperature from 350 °C (661.47 m2/g) to a maximum of 926.44 m2/g at 650 °C, accompanied by a corresponding rise in pore volume to 0.51 cm3/g. Simultaneously, the average pore diameter decreased from 3.33 nm to 2.21 nm, indicating the development of a more finely structured microporous network. These structural improvements at 650 °C facilitated the formation of high-density active sites and improved molecular diffusion pathways, which are crucial for effective DBT adsorption. As shown in Figure 2, the nitrogen adsorption desorption isotherms exhibit combined features of Type I and Type IV profiles, suggesting the coexistence of microporous and mesoporous structures. The pore size distribution confirms that, in addition to mesopores ranging from 2 to 5 nanometers, a substantial proportion of micropores between 0.8 and 2.0 nanometers is present. These structural features are most pronounced in the sample activated at 650 degrees Celsius, which also exhibits the highest surface area and pore volume, as detailed in Table 2. Given that the kinetic diameter of DBT is approximately 0.74 nanometers, the presence of large micropores allows effective physisorption through size-compatible interactions. These micropores provide access to internal surface sites and enhance van der Waals forces between DBT molecules and the carbon framework.
The impact of activation temperature on DBT removal efficiency is further illustrated in Figure 3. The adsorbent prepared at 650 °C exhibited the highest removal performance, confirming that the optimized pore architecture directly contributes to enhanced adsorption capacity. However, a sharp decline in performance was observed at 750 °C, despite the relatively high temperature. This reduction is attributed to excessive thermal degradation and the volatilization of phosphoric acid, which led to the collapse of micropores and a subsequent decrease in surface area and pore accessibility. As a result, both the physical structure and chemical functionality of the adsorbent were compromised, diminishing its effectiveness.
To visualize these morphological changes shown in Figure 4, at lower activation temperatures (350–450 °C), the carbon material exhibited irregular, non-porous structures. At 650 °C, a well-developed, interconnected porous network emerged, maximizing surface area and adsorption capacity. However, at 750 °C, structural collapse was evident, confirming the BET results. Thus, 650 °C was selected as the optimal activation temperature, balancing pore development and structural stability.
Although a high surface area enhances adsorption, the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups plays an equally important role in DBT removal by introducing π–π interactions and hydrogen bonding sites. Table 3 indicates that at lower activation temperatures, phenol and hydroxyl groups are more abundant, while higher temperatures favor pure carbonaceous structure. Given that DBT adsorption relies on both pore structure and chemical interactions, the balance between surface area and functional groups was found at 650 °C.
While phosphoric acid activation created a highly porous structure, DBT adsorption still relied on chemical interactions with surface functional groups. To enhance these interactions, the adsorbent underwent nitric acid oxidation, introducing oxygen-containing groups that facilitate π–π interactions and hydrogen bonding with DBT molecules. To further improve DBT adsorption, nitric acid oxidation was employed to introduce additional functional groups. Table 4 shows a significant increase in oxygen-containing functional groups, particularly at 70 °C, beyond which excessive oxidation caused structural degradation. Boehm titration results show that as modification temperature increased, the total surface acidity rose from 0.94 mmol/g to 2.24 mmol/g at 70 °C, beyond which the adsorption efficiency plateaued.
As shown in Figure 5, SEM images of the activated carbon samples treated with nitric acid at varying temperatures (30 °C to 90 °C) reveal significant morphological evolution. The sample treated at 30 °C (Figure 5a) exhibits a relatively smooth and compact surface, indicating limited pore development. With increasing treatment temperature to 60 °C and 70 °C (Figure 5b,c), the surface becomes progressively rougher and more porous, suggesting enhanced surface etching and pore exposure. Notably, the 70 °C sample shows the most well-developed and interconnected pore structure, which is favorable for mass transfer during adsorption. These morphological changes are further supported by the elemental composition analysis shown in the adjacent table in Figure 5. The oxygen content increases from 10.45 wt% at 30 °C to a maximum of 16.77 wt% at 70 °C, indicating the introduction of oxygen-containing functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and lactonic groups due to nitric acid oxidation. Beyond 70 °C, the oxygen content slightly decreases or stabilizes, suggesting possible degradation or saturation of surface functionalization. This correlation between surface morphology and oxygen enrichment confirms that moderate nitric acid treatment at 70 °C optimizes both surface area and chemical functionality, which are critical factors governing DBT adsorption efficiency.
As shown in Figure 6, all nitric acid-modified samples exhibit Type IV nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms with H3-type hysteresis loops, confirming the presence of mesoporous structures. Among these, the sample treated at 70 °C shows the highest nitrogen uptake across the entire relative pressure range, indicating a larger accessible surface area. This result aligns with the enhanced DBT adsorption performance and suggests that moderate acid treatment effectively improves the porosity of the carbon framework. The observed increase in nitrogen adsorption may be attributed to the oxidative effect of nitric acid, which can selectively etch the carbon surface and open previously inaccessible pores. On the other hand, treatments at higher temperatures (80–90 °C) show slightly reduced nitrogen uptake, likely due to partial pore collapse or over-oxidation. These findings corroborate the role of surface area and pore accessibility, in addition to functional group chemistry, in determining adsorption performance after HNO3 modification.
To further understand the role of surface functional groups in adsorption behavior, Boehm titration was conducted to quantify the concentration of oxygen-containing acidic sites on the carbon surface. As illustrated in Figure 7, the total content of carboxylic, lactonic, and phenolic groups significantly increased after HNO3 modification. Notably, the HNO3-70 sample exhibited the highest concentration of all three functional groups, with carboxylic groups increasing from 0.35 to 0.55 mmol/g, and phenolic groups from 0.45 to 0.61 mmol/g compared to the unmodified AC-650. These oxygen-containing groups provide additional polar sites, which enhance hydrogen bonding and polar–π interactions with the sulfur-containing DBT molecule. This rise in surface acidity is consistent with the observed improvement in adsorption capacity, highlighting that surface chemistry—particularly the introduction of acid functional groups—is a critical factor in determining DBT uptake performance.
As shown in Figure 8, the equilibrium data for DBT adsorption onto the HNO3-modified activated carbon were fitted using the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm models [24,25]. The Langmuir model (Figure 8a), which assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with a finite number of identical active sites, provided a strong correlation with the experimental data (R2 = 0.9933). The maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) predicted by the Langmuir model was 254.45 mg g−1, indicating that DBT molecules form a single molecular layer over the adsorbent surface without significant lateral interaction. The Freundlich model (Figure 8b), which assumes multilayer adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with a non-uniform distribution of heat of adsorption, showed a comparatively lower R2 value, suggesting that it is less suitable for this system. However, the fitting still reveals a moderate degree of surface heterogeneity. In contrast, the Langmuir–Freundlich model (Figure 8c), a hybrid that incorporates features of both monolayer and heterogeneous adsorption, yielded the highest correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.9971). This suggests that while monolayer adsorption is the dominant mechanism, the surface of the modified carbon exhibits a degree of energetic and structural heterogeneity. This heterogeneity likely arises from variations in surface chemistry and pore structure introduced during the phosphoric acid activation and nitric acid functionalization processes. The superior fit of the Langmuir–Freundlich model highlights the dual contribution of structural porosity and chemical functionalization in determining DBT adsorption. The presence of micropores enhances molecular confinement and physisorption, while oxygen-containing surface groups provide additional affinity via π–π interactions and hydrogen bonding. Together, these features account for the high adsorption capacity and support the interpretation that the adsorbent surface is not perfectly uniform but includes a range of adsorption site energies.
As shown in Figure 9, the adsorption kinetics of DBT were analyzed using both the pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models [25,26]. In Figure 9 a, the PFO model demonstrates a moderate linear relationship between ln (qₑ–qₜ) and time (R2 = 0.946), and the calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qₑ = 1.89 mg/g) is nearly identical to the experimental value (1.88 mg/g), indicating a good physical fit. This suggests that the adsorption is primarily governed by physisorption mechanisms such as van der Waals interactions or pore filling. In contrast, the PSO model shown in Figure 9 b yields an excellent linear fit (R2 = 0.999), implying a strong statistical correlation. However, the calculated qₑ is 10.00 mg/g substantially higher than the experimental value indicating a significant overestimation. This suggests that while the PSO model fits the data mathematically, it may misrepresent the actual mechanism or rate-controlling step in this system. Such discrepancies could be attributed to surface heterogeneity or non-ideal adsorption behavior.
The adsorption kinetics were further evaluated by comparing the calculated and experimental equilibrium adsorption capacities derived from the PFO and PSO models, as summarized in Table 5. The PFO model yielded a calculated qe of 1.89 mg/g, which is in excellent agreement with the experimentally observed value of 1.88 mg/g, with a deviation of less than 0.5%. This close fit indicates that the adsorption process is likely governed by physisorption mechanisms such as van der Waals interactions or pore diffusion. In contrast, the PSO model produced a much higher calculated qe value of 10.00 mg/g, resulting in a deviation exceeding 400% despite the model’s high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.999). Such a large overestimation suggests potential overfitting or numerical error, and it may not accurately reflect the actual adsorption behavior. Therefore, while the PSO model appears statistically superior, the PFO model is more physically reasonable and consistent with the experimentally observed adsorption performance.
The exothermic nature of DBT adsorption was confirmed by adsorption temperature studies (Figure 10), which showed that increasing temperature resulted in a decrease in DBT removal efficiency. This behavior is characteristic of physisorption supplemented by physisorption, where higher temperatures disrupt van der Waals forces, π–π interactions, and hydrogen bonding, leading to lower adsorption capacity.
Table 6 presents a comparative analysis of DBT adsorption performance among a range of reported adsorbents. Materials such as CMK-5 and MOF-derived TiO2/carbon composites demonstrate high adsorption capacities; however, their synthesis often requires complex multi-step procedures, specialized templates, or expensive precursors, which may limit their practical scalability and cost-efficiency. In comparison, the waste tire-derived activated carbon developed in this study exhibits a DBT adsorption capacity of 254.45 mg/g. This performance not only surpasses that of conventional activated carbons and low-cost biowaste-derived materials such as coconut shell carbon but also approaches or exceeds the performance of highly engineered porous structures. Remarkably, this high adsorption capacity is achieved with a surface area of 926.44 m2/g, which is moderate relative to some mesoporous counterparts. This indicates that surface chemistry, particularly the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups introduced through nitric acid modification, plays a more dominant role than surface area alone in enhancing DBT affinity.

3. Discussion

The inclusion of adsorption thermodynamic analysis and performance benchmarking with existing adsorbents reinforces both the theoretical significance and practical applicability of this study. The modified rubber-derived carbon exhibited an outstanding DBT adsorption capacity of 254.45 mg/g, surpassing many conventional materials such as commercial activated carbon, zeolites, and metal–organic framework materials. In addition to confirming the superior adsorption performance, the results provide valuable insights into the adsorption mechanism of DBT and establish a solid scientific basis for the development of large-scale fuel desulfurization technologies. This research demonstrates the potential of converting waste tires into high-performance functional materials, supporting both environmental sustainability and industrial relevance. Future work may focus on enhancing surface functionalization strategies and improving long-term operational stability for practical deployment.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The recycled tire particle was supplied by You Hsien Trading Co., Ltd. (Tainan, Taiwan). All of the chemicals (e.g., nitric acid 85%; sodium bicarbonate, 99.5% SHOWA, sulfuric acid 95.9%, aqueous hydrochloric acid, 37%, J. T. Baker, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, phosphoric acid, 69.5%, Hexane, 99%, dibenzothiophene, 98%, Echo Chem. Co., Ltd., Toufen, Taiwan, and pure nitrogen gas (99.99%, San Fu Chem. Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan) used in this work were not further purified before usage.

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Waste Tire Cleaning

Recycled tire granules were thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove iron filings and ash residues. The cleaned rubber was then dried in an oven at 70 °C for 12 h.

4.2.2. Sulfonation and Thermal Cracking

A total of 5 g of dried tire rubber was mixed with 40 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid and stirred at 60 °C for 4 h. The sulfonated rubber was filtered and rinsed with distilled water until neutral, then dried at 70 °C. The dried material was carbonized under nitrogen atmosphere by heating to 650 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and maintained at this temperature for 30 min. After natural cooling to room temperature, the resulting carbon black was ground using a ball mill at 240 rpm for 6 h.

4.2.3. Phosphoric Acid Activation

Tire-derived carbon black was mixed with concentrated H3PO4 at different weight ratios (50%, 100%, 150%, 200%, and 250%) and soaked for 6 h at room temperature. The samples were then heated under N2 atmosphere to 650 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and held for 30 min. For temperature-dependent studies, samples with a fixed H3PO4 ratio (2:1 by weight) were activated at 350, 450, 550, 650, and 750 °C under the same conditions. All activated samples were washed with 1 M NaOH and distilled water until neutral pH was reached, then dried at 100 °C for 12 h.

4.2.4. Chemical Modification via Nitric Acid on the Surface of Tire Particle

The chemical modification of activated tire-derived carbon was performed to enhance its surface functional groups. In this procedure, 3 g of activated carbon was added to 40 mL of nitric acid solution with a fixed concentration of 15 M. The suspension was stirred continuously at controlled temperatures of 30 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, 80 °C, or 90 °C for a fixed modification time of 3 h. After the reaction, the nitric acid-modified carbon was thoroughly washed with distilled water until the filtrate reached neutral pH, and then dried in an oven at 100 °C for 12 h.

4.3. Characterization

The crystallinity and phase composition of the samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a diffractometer (Bruker D8 Advance, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. Data were recorded over a 2θ range of 10° to 80° with a step size of 0.02°. Surface morphology was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6510, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), operated at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV with a working distance of approximately 10 mm and secondary electron detection. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to determine the surface elemental composition. Textural properties were determined by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer, Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA. Prior to measurement, samples were degassed at 200 °C for 8 h. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method was used to determine specific surface area, and the pore size distribution was derived using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.

4.4. Adsorption Performance Test

The adsorption capacity of dibenzothiophene (DBT) was used to evaluate the adsorptive performance of the synthesized carbons. In a typical test, 20 mg of adsorbent was dispersed into 20 mL of a DBT/n-hexane solution (500 ppm) and stirred at room temperature (25 °C) for 6 h. For temperature-dependent studies, experiments were conducted at 25 °C, 35 °C, 45 °C, and 55 °C under the same conditions. After adsorption, the suspensions were filtered, and the residual DBT concentration was analyzed using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-5100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 325 nm. The adsorption capacity (Q, mg/g) was calculated by the equation
Q = C 0 C e × V m
where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium DBT concentrations (mg/L), V is the solution volume (L), and m is the adsorbent mass (g). All experiments were conducted in triplicate and averaged to ensure reliability. The adsorption experiments were conducted using a single-solute DBT solution without coexisting sulfur compounds. Selectivity analysis was not included in this work.

5. Conclusions

The integration of adsorption thermodynamic analysis and performance benchmarking against existing adsorbents underscores both the theoretical significance and practical potential of this study. The modified rubber-derived carbon demonstrated an exceptional DBT adsorption capacity of 254.45 mg/g, outperforming conventional materials such as commercial activated carbon, zeolites, and MOFs. Beyond confirming the superior adsorption efficiency, the findings offer critical insights into the DBT adsorption mechanism, thereby establishing a robust scientific foundation for the advancement of large-scale fuel desulfurization technologies. This work highlights the viability of transforming waste tires into high-performance functional materials, aligning with goals of environmental sustainability and industrial applicability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-L.T.; methodology, J.-H.L.; formal analysis, A.-Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-L.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.-M.D.; supervision, M.-L.T., A.-Y.L. and Y.-M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, C.; Ma, X. New design approaches to ultra-clean diesel fuels by deep desulfurization and deep dearomatization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 41, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Babich, I.V.; Moulijn, J.A. Science and technology of novel processes for deep desulfurization of oil refinery streams: A review. Fuel 2003, 82, 607–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Swain, E.J.U.S. crude slate gets heavier higher in sulfur. Oil Gas. J. 1991, 89, 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Swain, E.J.U.S. refining crude slates continue towards heavier feeds, highs sulfur contents. Oil Gas. J. 1998, 96, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  5. Toshiki, F. Thermophilic biodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene and its derivatives by Mycobacterium phlei WU-F1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 204, 129–133. [Google Scholar]
  6. Abro, R.; Abdeltawab, A.A.; Al-Deyab, S.S. A review of extractive desulfurization of fuel oils using ionic liquids. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 35302–35317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Julião, D.; Gomes, A.C.; Pillinger, M. Desulfurization of model diesel by extraction/oxidation using a zinc-substituted polyoxometalate as catalyst under homogeneous and heterogeneous (MIL-101 (Cr) encapsulated) conditions. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 131, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, L. Efficient adsorptive removal of dibenzothiophene from model fuel over heteroatom-doped porous carbons by carbonization of an organic salt. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Sha, L.; Zhang, S.; Cao, F.; Ren, X.; Levendis, Y.A. Preparation of activated coke by carbonization, activation, ammonization and thermal treatment of sewage sludge and waste biomass for SO2 absorption applications. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 231, 107233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, S.; Lu, H.; Li, W. Effect of pore structure and oxygen-containing groups on adsorption of dibenzothiophene over activated carbon. Fuel 2017, 200, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nunthaprechachan, T.; Pengpanich, S.; Hunsom, M. Adsorptive desulfurization of dibenzothiophene by sewage sludge-derived activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, S.; Srivastava, V.C.; Badoni, R.P. Studies on adsorptive desulfurization by zirconia-based adsorbents. Fuel 2011, 90, 3209–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sentorun-Shalaby, C.; Saha, S.K.; Ma, X.; Song, C. Mesoporous-molecular-sieve-supported nickel sorbents for adsorptive desulfurization of commercial ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 101, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shan, G.; Liu, H.; Xing, J. Separation of polycyclic aromatic compounds from model gasoline by magnetic alumina sorbent based on π-complexation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, E.; Yao, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Jia, L.; Li, D.; Fu, Z.; Sun, D.; Kirk, S.R.; Yin, D. Bamboo-derived porous biochar for efficient adsorption removal of dibenzothiophene from model fuel. Fuel 2018, 121, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pallarés, J.; González-Cencerrado, A.; Arauzo, I. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 115, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nejad, N.F.; Shams, E.; Amini, M.K. Ordered mesoporous carbon CMK-5 as a potential sorbent for fuel desulfurization: Application to the removal of dibenzothiophene and comparison with CMK-3. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 168, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shah, S.S.; Ahmad, I.; Ahmad, W. Adsorptive desulfurization study of liquid fuels using tin (Sn) impregnated activated charcoal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 304, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Swat, A.; Saleh, A.; Ganiyu, A.; Siddiqui, M.N. Preparation of activated carbon, zinc oxide and nickel oxide composites for potential application in the desulfurization of model diesel fuels. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 128, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saleh, T.A.; Al-Hammadi, S.A.; Tanimu, A.; Alhooshani, K. Ultra-deep adsorptive desulfurization of fuels on cobalt and molybdenum nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon derived from waste rubber. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2018, 513, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adhikari, B.; Maiti, S.; Bhowmick, A.K. Reclamation and recycling of waste rubber. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 909–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kassahun, E.; Mekuria, S.; Beyan, S.M. Specific surface area enhancement of waste tire-based activated carbon by demineralization technique and adsorption of methylene blue. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, A.; Chandra, R. Kinetics and equilibrium isotherm modeling: Graphene-based nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from water. In Nanomaterials for Wastewater Remediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 79–109. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, J.Z. Avoiding spurious correlation in analysis of chemical kinetic data. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6861–6863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Revellame, E.D.; Fortela, D.L.; Sharp, W.; Hernandez, R.; Zappi, M.E. Adsorption kinetic modeling using pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order rate laws: A review. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2020, 1, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fayazi, M.; Taher, M.A.; Afzali, D.; Mostafavi, A. Removal of dibenzothiophene using activated carbon/γ-Fe2O3 nano-composite: Kinetic and thermodynamic investigation of the removal process. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res. 2015, 2, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma, R.; Ma, Y.; Dong, Y.; Lee, J.M. Recent advances in heteroatom-doped graphene materials as efficient electrocatalysts towards the oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Adv. 2016, 1, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seredych, M.; Bandosz, T.J. Template-derived mesoporous carbons with highly dispersed transition metals as media for the reactive adsorption of dibenzothiophene. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6033–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhadra, B.N.; Song, J.Y.; Khan, N.A.; Jhung, S.H. TiO2-containing carbon derived from a metal-organic framework composite: A highly active catalyst for oxidative desulfurization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31192–31202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Neves, C.V.; Módenes, A.N.; Scheufele, F.B.; Rocha, R.P.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Figueiredo, J.L.; Borba, C.E. Dibenzothiophene adsorption onto carbon-based adsorbent produced from the coconut shell: Effect of the functional groups density and textural properties on kinetics and equilibrium. Fuel 2021, 292, 120354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Q.; Liang, X.; Qiao, W.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhan, L.; Ling, L. Preparation of polystyrene-based activated carbon spheres with high surface area and their adsorption to dibenzothiophene. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD measures (a) unsulfonated rubber-derived carbon; (b) sulfonated rubber-derived carbon. (Sulfonated rubber: 5 g of tire rubber was treated with 40 mL of H2SO4 (95–98%) at 60 °C for 4 h).
Figure 1. XRD measures (a) unsulfonated rubber-derived carbon; (b) sulfonated rubber-derived carbon. (Sulfonated rubber: 5 g of tire rubber was treated with 40 mL of H2SO4 (95–98%) at 60 °C for 4 h).
Carbon 11 00047 g001
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isothermal curve of adsorbent prepared at different activation temperatures (phosphate/carbon black weight percentage is 2.0:1.0).
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isothermal curve of adsorbent prepared at different activation temperatures (phosphate/carbon black weight percentage is 2.0:1.0).
Carbon 11 00047 g002
Figure 3. Adsorption isotherm of DBT on activated carbon and carbonized at 650 °C. DBT adsorption solution: Concentration 500 ppm, volume: 70 mL, pH 7.0. Adsorption conditions: temperature: 30 °C, speed: 120 rpm and adsorption time of 1 h. Activation conditions: phosphoric acid/tire carbon black ratio of 2.0:1.0.
Figure 3. Adsorption isotherm of DBT on activated carbon and carbonized at 650 °C. DBT adsorption solution: Concentration 500 ppm, volume: 70 mL, pH 7.0. Adsorption conditions: temperature: 30 °C, speed: 120 rpm and adsorption time of 1 h. Activation conditions: phosphoric acid/tire carbon black ratio of 2.0:1.0.
Carbon 11 00047 g003
Figure 4. SEM observes the adsorbent prepared at activation temperature (a) 350, (b) 450, (c) 550, (d) 650, (e) 750 °C. (Phosphate/tire carbon black weight ratio of 2.0:1.0).
Figure 4. SEM observes the adsorbent prepared at activation temperature (a) 350, (b) 450, (c) 550, (d) 650, (e) 750 °C. (Phosphate/tire carbon black weight ratio of 2.0:1.0).
Carbon 11 00047 g004
Figure 5. SEM and EDS observation of the adsorbents prepared at (a) 30, (b) 60, (c) 70, (d) 80, (e) 90 °C. (Modification conditions: fixed nitric acid concentration of 15 M and modification time of 3 h).
Figure 5. SEM and EDS observation of the adsorbents prepared at (a) 30, (b) 60, (c) 70, (d) 80, (e) 90 °C. (Modification conditions: fixed nitric acid concentration of 15 M and modification time of 3 h).
Carbon 11 00047 g005
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms of HNO3-modified samples at different temperatures.
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms of HNO3-modified samples at different temperatures.
Carbon 11 00047 g006
Figure 7. Boehm titration results showing the concentration of carboxylic (–COOH), lactonic, and phenolic (–OH) groups on carbon samples before and after nitric acid modification.
Figure 7. Boehm titration results showing the concentration of carboxylic (–COOH), lactonic, and phenolic (–OH) groups on carbon samples before and after nitric acid modification.
Carbon 11 00047 g007
Figure 8. Adsorption isotherm fitting of DBT using (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Langmuir–Freundlich models.
Figure 8. Adsorption isotherm fitting of DBT using (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Langmuir–Freundlich models.
Carbon 11 00047 g008
Figure 9. Nonlinear fitting of DBT adsorption kinetics using (a) pseudo-first-order and (b) pseudo-second-order models.
Figure 9. Nonlinear fitting of DBT adsorption kinetics using (a) pseudo-first-order and (b) pseudo-second-order models.
Carbon 11 00047 g009
Figure 10. Effect of adsorption temperature on removal. DBT adsorbent: initial concentration 500 ppm, volume: 70 mL and pH 7.0. Adsorption environment: speed: 120 rpm and adsorption time 1 h. Adsorbent dosage: 0.1 g.
Figure 10. Effect of adsorption temperature on removal. DBT adsorbent: initial concentration 500 ppm, volume: 70 mL and pH 7.0. Adsorption environment: speed: 120 rpm and adsorption time 1 h. Adsorbent dosage: 0.1 g.
Carbon 11 00047 g010
Table 1. EDS results showing elemental composition before and after sulfuric acid treatment.
Table 1. EDS results showing elemental composition before and after sulfuric acid treatment.
SampleCarbon Content (%)Major Impurities (Si, Zn, S) (%)
Untreated85.3214.68
Sulfuric Acid-Treated95.684.32
Table 2. Effect of activation temperature on adsorbent pore structure.
Table 2. Effect of activation temperature on adsorbent pore structure.
Activation Temperature
°C
Specific Surface Area
m2/g
Pore Volume
cm3/g
Average Pore Diameter (nm)
350661.470.403.33
450728.440.422.64
550813.430.442.62
650926.440.512.21
750641.890.393.30
Table 3. Boehm titrates the preparation of sorbents at different activation temperatures.
Table 3. Boehm titrates the preparation of sorbents at different activation temperatures.
Activation Temperature (°C)Acid Functional Group, mmol/g
LipidHydroxyPhenolTotal Acid
3500.140.250.751.14
4500.140.250.721.11
5500.130.210.610.95
6500.130.210.600.94
7500.120.170.550.84
Table 4. Boehm titration of adsorbents prepared at different nitric acid modification temperatures. nitric acid concentration: 15 M, modifier time: 3 h.
Table 4. Boehm titration of adsorbents prepared at different nitric acid modification temperatures. nitric acid concentration: 15 M, modifier time: 3 h.
Modification Temperature
(°C)
Acid Functional Group, mmol/g
LipidHydroxyPhenolTotal Acid
AC *0.130.210.600.94
300.210.301.211.72
600.280.381.512.17
700.300.411.532.24
800.250.441.562.28
900.270.481.612.36
* AC refers to the unmodified activated carbon prepared at 650 °C without nitric acid treatment.
Table 5. Comparison of kinetic model fitting results for DBT adsorption.
Table 5. Comparison of kinetic model fitting results for DBT adsorption.
Cal. qe (mg/g)Exp. qe (mg/g)K ValueR2
PFO1.891.880.10.946
PSO101.880.00520.999
Table 6. Comparative adsorption performance of different adsorbents for DBT removal.
Table 6. Comparative adsorption performance of different adsorbents for DBT removal.
DBT Adsorption (mg/g)Surface Area (m2/g)Ref.
Waste tire-derived activated carbon254.45926.44This work
Magnetic activated carbon/γ-Fe2O3 composite38.0200–400[27]
ZnCl2-activated mesoporous carbon nanospheres70–903000[28]
CMK-5 mesoporous carbon 1301000[29]
MOF-derived TiO2/carbon composite1901500–2000[30]
Coconut shell activated carbon 80–120750–800[31]
Polystyrene-based activated carbon1532022[32]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsai, M.-L.; Lo, A.-Y.; Liu, J.-H.; Dai, Y.-M. Optimized Adsorptive Desulfurization Using Waste Tire-Derived Carbon. C 2025, 11, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11030047

AMA Style

Tsai M-L, Lo A-Y, Liu J-H, Dai Y-M. Optimized Adsorptive Desulfurization Using Waste Tire-Derived Carbon. C. 2025; 11(3):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11030047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsai, Ming-Liao, An-Ya Lo, Jun-Hao Liu, and Yong-Ming Dai. 2025. "Optimized Adsorptive Desulfurization Using Waste Tire-Derived Carbon" C 11, no. 3: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11030047

APA Style

Tsai, M.-L., Lo, A.-Y., Liu, J.-H., & Dai, Y.-M. (2025). Optimized Adsorptive Desulfurization Using Waste Tire-Derived Carbon. C, 11(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11030047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop