Next Article in Journal
Environmental Impacts and Adsorption Isotherms of Coconut Shell Activated Carbon: Effect of Acid Activation, Water, and Fuel
Previous Article in Journal
Historical Drivers and Reduction Paths of CO2 Emissions in Jiangsu’s Cement Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Superhard Tetragonal Hybrid sp3/sp2 Carbon Allotropes Cx (x = 5, 6, 7): Crystal Chemistry and Ab Initio Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties

1
Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation (TEMA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory (LASI), 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
Submission received: 20 February 2025 / Revised: 25 February 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 8 March 2025
Carbon materials have played a pivotal role in humanity’s progress since ancient times. Their significance can be traced throughout history, shaping the evolution of civilization. One of the earliest uses of carbon materials was artistic expression, in which charcoal served as a pigment for cave paintings, contributing to the social and symbolic development of early societies [1]. In the 18th century, coal became a driving force behind scientific and technological advancements, ultimately leading to the First Industrial Revolution [2]. The invention of the steam engine, powered by coal, revolutionized manufacturing and transportation, and fueled economic growth and industrialization. More recently, carbon fibers have been widely explored for commercial applications, particularly in the form of polymeric composites [3]. These advanced composite materials exhibit a synergistic effect between their components, which allows them to outperform in industries such as the transportation and prosthetics industries, among others.
The discovery of carbon nanomaterials has expanded the potential of carbon-based materials for high-tech applications. This journey began in 1985 with the identification of cage-like fullerenes [4]. Another significant breakthrough occurred in 1991 when Sumio Iijima discovered multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) consisting of multiple carbon sheets rolled into tubes with closed ends [5]. This discovery ignited a global search for new allotropic forms of carbon. Today, a vast array of carbon nanostructures, including nano-onions, carbon nanohorns, graphene and its derivatives, and carbon dots, amongst others, are applied across diverse fields, including in healthcare, environmental science, energy storage, sensing, and electronics.
The importance of these discoveries was recognized by the scientific community with the awarding of the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Professor Robert F. Curl of Rice University, Houston, USA [6]. Later, in 2010, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov of the University of Manchester (UK) for their groundbreaking discovery of graphene, the first two-dimensional material with atomic thickness to be isolated under room conditions [7,8].
Carbon nanomaterials, with their diverse dimensions and structures, exhibit excellent mechanical strength, electrical and thermal conductivities, and show a high versatility for chemical surface functionalization [9,10]. This adaptability is crucial for modulating interfaces at the atomic level and enhancing dispersibility and compatibility with various matrices. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a powerful tool for analyzing the atomic composition of carbon-based materials. David J. Morgan recently reviewed XPS spectral analysis of graphitic materials, presenting a simple and logical approach to increase confidence in functionalization insights derived from carbon core-level spectra [11].
Graphene and its derivatives have attracted significant interest in the development of advanced nanocomposites with enhanced performances [12]. Navaratnarajah K. et al. recently reviewed major synthetic methods for graphene-based materials, providing a systematic analysis of their physicochemical properties and applications, including batteries, supercapacitors, electrochemical sensors, transparent electrodes, and environmental remediation [13].
Graphene-based materials exhibit high thermal conductivity, making them ideal for developing multifunctional nanocomposites with enhanced thermal stability and for use as solid lubricants for heat dissipation [14]. Alexander A. Balandin investigated the use of graphene as a reinforcing agent in epoxy resin to improve thermal diffusivity and conductivity. This work demonstrated that epoxy nanocomposites containing randomly oriented few-layer and single-layer graphene achieved a remarkable thermal conductivity enhancement of 15% to 25% [15]. Jacob S. Lewis studied the equilibrium temperatures of engineered device substitutes fixed to passive heat sink solutions with varying concentrations of few-layer graphene (FLG) as thermal interface materials (TIMs). His results showed that increasing FLG TIM concentration from 0 to 7.3 vol.% reduced the passively cooled heat sink’s thermal resistance from 4.23 °C/W to 2.93 °C/W, leading to a decrease in operating temperature from approximately 108 °C to 85 °C at a heat dissipation rate of 20 W [16].
Graphene-based materials have also been explored as electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors or supercapacitors (SCs) for applications in energy storage devices, electrical vehicles, and flexible electronics [17,18]. Alexander Tkach et al. developed a self-supported paper of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with polycarbonate (PC) as a freestanding single electrode. The flexible graphene-based symmetric supercapacitors showed a higher areal capacitance value then PET/Cu/C substrate [19]. rGO attracted considerable attention for the development of high-performance sensing materials. A recent study demonstrated the development of rGO-based electrodes using laser irradiation for thin flexible electrochemical sensors. The surface impedance of the rGO electrode was sensitive to the humidity of the working environment. However, it still presented some operational limitations, including difficulty in recovering after exposure to environmental humidity [20]. It was also observed that graphene can be utilized as a processing aid in molten polystyrene. A recent study compared the performance of different graphene materials and clays with different lateral structures to reduce viscosity. Graphene in a loose agglomerated configuration showed a higher reduction in polymer viscosity. This decrease in viscosity was attributed to the superlubricity effects generated by the atomic structure of graphene nanoparticles. Another example reported by Grigoriev et al. is the synthesis of a novel rGO-doped platinum nanoparticle electrocatalyst. Their study found that prior modification of rGO with nitrogen-containing heteroatoms (pyridine and quaternary) promoted the nucleation of Pt nanoparticles while preventing their agglomeration. This enhancement resulted in a high catalytic efficiency of the Pt nanoparticles, surpassing that of the bare rGO-supported catalyst and comparable to that of Pt/C [21].
CNTs are one-dimensional nanomaterials classified based on the number of graphene layers into single-walled (SWCNTs) [22], double-walled (DWCNTs) [23], or multi-walled (MWCNTs) [24]. SWCNTs have diameters ranging from 0.4 to 3.0 nm and can reach lengths of several micrometers. Composed of a single sp2-hybridized carbon lattice, SWCNTs exist in three distinct chiral forms: armchair, chiral, and zigzag. Indeed, their structure directly influences their electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties [25]. Recently, Chensong Dong reported a new, simple method for determining the effective elastic modulus of wavy SWCNTs by finite element analysis [26]. MWCNTs typically have an inner diameter ranging from 0.4 nm to a few nanometers, with outer diameters reaching up to 30 nm. Their length can vary from 1 μm to several centimeters [27]. Rosario A. Gerhardt recently reviewed MWCNTs and thin films’ fabrication methodologies, as well as their applications as electrode materials for electrochemical double-layer supercapacitors [28].
CNTs exhibit remarkable properties, including a high mechanical tensile modulus, strength (~1 TPa), and excellent electrical (>106 S/m) and thermal conductivity (>3000 W/m K) [29]. However, their performance and reactivity are highly dependent on factors such as structure, surface area, surface charge, size distribution, surface chemistry, agglomeration state, and purity. Andrew R. Barron et al. investigated the effects of both thermal and voltage-induced annealing on the electrical conductivity of CNT fibers. Their study found that fibers annealed at 500 °C or subjected to voltage annealing under similar conditions exhibited a three-order-of-magnitude reduction in electrical resistance. This improvement was primarily attributed to the selective removal of non-conductive or less-conductive amorphous carbon and the self-repair mechanisms of CNTs, which enhanced their conductivity [30]. To expand their range of applications, CNTs can undergo chemical functionalization on their surface (exohedral) or within their internal cavity (endohedral) to create various novel hybrid materials for different applications [31]. Kenji Hata et al. investigated the correlation between CNT/Cu electrical performance by preparing three different types of CNT-Cu composites using Cu electrodeposition: SWCNT/Cu wires, SWCNT/Cu pillars, and MWCNT/Cu wires [32]. Their study revealed that SWCNT/Cu wires and pillars outperformed MWCNT/Cu wires, exhibiting approximately three times higher room-temperature, measured using a four-point probe (reaching 30–40% of pure Cu conductivity). Additionally, the SWCNT/Cu composites demonstrated up to four times lower temperature coefficients of resistance, indicating more stable conductivity across temperature variations compared to MWCNT/Cu. These findings also suggest that few-walled, small-diameter nanotubes contribute to superior temperature-stable CNT/Cu conductivities.
Many other examples of carbon-based composite materials with enhanced performance have been reported over the years. Several carbon-reinforcing agents have been studied, including carbon fibers [33], carbon black [34], diamond [35,36], and nano graphite [37]. Additionally, more unconventional allotropes, such as tetragonal hybrid sp3/sp2 carbon structures [38], have also been explored. These studies highlight the exceptional mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties that emerge from synergistic interactions between carbon nanostructures and various matrices. These properties have significant scientific and technological relevance across multiple fields.
This Special Issue, Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties, published in C—Journal of Carbon Research, compiles 20 original research articles and review papers. These contributions provide valuable insights into the development of carbon-based composite materials with improved performance in diverse applications. It is anticipated that articles on this Special Issue will offer readers a strong foundational understanding of this rapidly advancing field.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) trough the projects 10.54499/UIDB/00481/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00481/2020, accessed on 20 February 2025) and 10.54499/UIDP/00481/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00481/2020, accessed on 20 February 2025) and the project CarboNCT 2022.03596.PTDC (https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.03596.PTDC, accessed on 20 February 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Callaway, E. Is This Cave Painting Humanity’s Oldest Story? Nature 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernihough, A.; O’Rourke, K.H. Coal and the European Industrial Revolution. Econ. J. 2021, 131, 1135–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Lin, G.; Vaidya, U.; Wang, H. Past, Present and Future Prospective of Global Carbon Fibre Composite Developments and Applications. Compos. B Eng. 2023, 250, 110463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kroto, H.W.; Heath, J.R.; O’Brien, S.C.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985, 318, 162–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Iijima, S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bali, P. Fullerenes Finally Score as Nobel Committee Honours Chemists. Nature 1996, 383, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gerstner, E. Nobel Prize 2010: Andre Geim & Konstantin Novoselov. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. It’s Still All about Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 1. [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, Y.P.; Fu, K.; Lin, Y.; Huang, W. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Properties and Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, Y.; Pang, Y.X.; Yan, Y.; Qian, P.; Zhao, H.; Manickam, S.; Wu, T.; Pang, C.H. Synthesis and Functionalization of Graphene Materials for Biomedical Applications: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2205292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morgan, D.J. Comments on the XPS Analysis of Carbon Materials. C 2021, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Punetha, V.D.; Rana, S.; Yoo, H.J.; Chaurasia, A.; McLeskey, J.T.; Ramasamy, M.S.; Sahoo, N.G.; Cho, J.W. Functionalization of Carbon Nanomaterials for Advanced Polymer Nanocomposites: A Comparison Study between CNT and Graphene. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 67, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Santhiran, A.; Iyngaran, P.; Abiman, P.; Kuganathan, N. Graphene Synthesis and Its Recent Advances in Applications—A Review. C 2021, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Govindaraj, P.; Sokolova, A.; Salim, N.; Juodkazis, S.; Fuss, F.K.; Fox, B.; Hameed, N. Distribution States of Graphene in Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review. Compos. B Eng. 2021, 226, 109353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lewis, J.S.; Perrier, T.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Kargar, F.; Balandin, A.A. Power Cycling and Reliability Testing of Epoxy-Based Graphene Thermal Interface Materials. C 2020, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lewis, J.S. Reduction of Device Operating Temperatures with Graphene-Filled Thermal Interface Materials. C 2021, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Z.S.; Parvez, K.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Graphene-Based in-Plane Micro-Supercapacitors with High Power and Energy Densities. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, Y.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. An Overview of the Applications of Graphene-Based Materials in Supercapacitors. Small 2012, 8, 1805–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okhay, O.; Bastos, A.C.; Andreeva, K.; Tuukkanen, S.; Tkach, A. Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors. C 2022, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rowley, A.; Stehle, Y.; Kilby, L.; Bashant, C. Graphene Oxide Membranes: Controlled Laser Reduction for Sensing Applications. C 2023, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kozlova, M.; Butrim, S.; Solovyev, M.; Pushkarev, A.; Pushkareva, I.; Kalinichenko, V.; Akelkina, S.; Grigoriev, S. Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers. C 2022, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ouyang, M.; Huang, J.L.; Lieber, C.M. Fundamental Electronic Properties and Applications of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moore, K.E.; Tune, D.D.; Flavel, B.S. Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube Processing. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3105–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Andrews, R.; Jacques, D.; Qian, D.; Rantell, T. Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis and Application. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1008–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Odom, T.W.; Huang, J.L.; Kim, P.; Lieber, C.M. Atomic Structure and Electronic Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nature 1998, 391, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, C. Effective Elastic Modulus of Wavy Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. C 2023, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lehman, J.H.; Terrones, M.; Mansfield, E.; Hurst, K.E.; Meunier, V. Evaluating the characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 49, 2581–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, K.; Gerhardt, R.A. Fabrication and Supercapacitor Applications of Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Thin Films. C 2021, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Volder, M.F.L.; Tawfick, S.H.; Baughman, R.H.; Hart, A.J. Carbon Nanotubes: Present and Future Commercial Applications. Science 2013, 339, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gangoli, V.S.; Barnett, C.J.; McGettrick, J.D.; Orbaek White, A.; Barron, A.R. Increased Electrical Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube Fibers by Thermal and Voltage Annealing. C 2022, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, D.; Shi, L.; Dai, Q.; Lin, X.; Mehmood, R.; Gu, Z.; Dai, L. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes for Multifunctional Applications. Trends Chem. 2024, 6, 186–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sundaram, R.; Sekiguchi, A.; Chen, G.; Futaba, D.; Yamada, T.; Kokubo, K.; Hata, K. Influence of Carbon Nanotube Attributes on Carbon Nanotube/Cu Composite Electrical Performances. C 2021, 7, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ofoegbu, S.U.; Ferreira, M.G.S.; Nogueira, H.I.S.; Zheludkevich, M. Comparison of the Electrochemical Response of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic (CFRP), Glassy Carbon, and Highly Ordered Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) in Near-Neutral Aqueous Chloride Media. C 2023, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Velidakis, E.; Mountakis, N.; Fischer-Griffiths, P.E.; Grammatikos, S.; Tzounis, L. Fused Filament Fabrication Three-Dimensional Printing Multi-Functional of Polylactic Acid/Carbon Black Nanocomposites. C 2021, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A. Study of the Influence of Silicon-Containing Diamond-like Carbon Coatings on the Wear Resistance of SiAlON Tool Ceramics. C 2023, 9, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lebedev, O.V.; Kurkin, T.S.; Golubev, E.K.; Vasiliev, A.L.; Gatin, A.K.; Goncharuk, G.P.; Ozerin, A.N. Detonation Synthesis Nanodiamond Soot as a Promising Filler for Polymer Composites. C 2022, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kausar, A. Avant-Garde Polymer and Nano-Graphite-Derived Nanocomposites—Versatility and Implications. C 2023, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matar, S.F.; Solozhenko, V.L. Novel Superhard Tetragonal Hybrid Sp3/Sp2 Carbon Allotropes Cx (x = 5, 6, 7): Crystal Chemistry and Ab Initio Studies. C 2024, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gonçalves, G. Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties. C 2025, 11, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010021

AMA Style

Gonçalves G. Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties. C. 2025; 11(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gonçalves, Gil. 2025. "Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties" C 11, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010021

APA Style

Gonçalves, G. (2025). Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties. C, 11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop