Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Reduction of Arsenic Uptake and Alleviation of Leaf Arsenic Toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Exogenous Iron through Antioxidant Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
OMICS and Other Advanced Technologies in Mycological Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Locally Isolated Trichoderma harzianum Species Have Broad Spectrum Biocontrol Activities against the Wood Rot Fungal Species through Both Volatile Inhibition and Mycoparasitism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biogeographic Patterns of Fungal Sub-Communities under Different Land-Use Types in Subtropical China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Cryptic Species in the Cordyceps militaris Complex from Vietnam

1
Yunnan Herbal Laboratory, College of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China
2
The International Joint Research Center for Sustainable Utilization of Cordyceps Bioresources in China and Southeast Asia, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China
3
Institute of Regional Research and Development, Ministry of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(6), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060676
Submission received: 29 April 2023 / Revised: 3 June 2023 / Accepted: 4 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Biodiversity and Ecology, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
The Cordyceps militaris complex, which is a special group in the genus Cordyceps, is rich in species diversity and is widely distributed in nature. Throughout the investigations of arthropod-pathogenic fungi in the national reserves and in Vietnam parks, collections of C. militaris attacking lepidopteran pupae or larvae were located in the soil and on the leaf litter. The phylogenetic analyses of the combined nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 sequence data indicated that the fungal materials collected in Vietnam belonged to C. militaris and two hidden species in the C. militaris complex. The phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparisons presented here strongly supported the descriptions of C. polystromata and C. sapaensis as new taxa as well as C. militaris as a known species. The morphological characteristics of 11 species in the C. militaris complex, which included two novel species and nine known taxa, were also compared.

1. Introduction

The genus Cordyceps is a very important fungal resource, with some of the species having economic, medicinal, and ecological importance. Cordyceps chanhua has been applied as a tonic and medicinal food in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for a long time due to its significant health benefits [1]. “Mister Lei’s Treatise on Processing Drugs” recorded C. chanhua as a TCM nearly 1500 years ago (Chinese Southern and Northern Dynasties). Cordyceps tenuipes are widely used as a raw material in functional foods in Japan and South Korea, because of their important immune-regulatory, antitumor, analgesic, antibacterial, antimalaria, and other pharmacological effects [2]. Cordyceps fumosorosea are an important environmentally safe alternative to chemical pesticides for the interspecific transmission and biological control of pest insects [3,4]. One of the best-known edible and medicinal cordycipitoid fungi is C. militaris; it has been used in East Asian countries, including China, Korea, and Japan, for many years and it is currently widely used in Western countries [5,6]. In recent years, research has shown that C. militaris possesses different biologically active ingredients that are beneficial to the human body; these include cordycepin, cordycepic acid, cordyceps polysaccharides, pentastatin, and carotenoids [7,8,9]. Currently, a vast C. militaris industry exists in China that has created an estimated economic value of 10 billion Chinese Yuan annually [6].
Cordyceps militaris is the oldest accepted scientific name, although this species was described in the 17th- and early 18th-century literature under the old and now obsolete generic names Fungus and Fungoides [10]. The species was transferred to Clavaria by Linnaeus (1753) and then again transferred to the ascomycete genus Sphaeria by Ehrhart (1791) (https://www.mycobank.org, accessed on 20 April 2023), a classification that was followed up until the early 19th century [10]. In 1818, this species was then transferred to its own genus, and Cordyceps Fries was erected on the basis of C. militaris as the type species [11].
Cordyceps sensu lato (s. l.) is an important worldwide group of arthropod-pathogenic fungi, with the height of known species diversity in subtropical and tropical regions [12,13]. Vietnam is located in a tropical region that has an extremely rich biodiversity in Southeast Asia. These forests feature a rich biodiversity of flora and fauna because of the tropical monsoon climate with high temperatures and rainfall [14]. These conditions have produced a favorable environment for the development of arthropod-pathogenic fungi. Currently, over 100 species of Cordyceps s. l. have been reported, but this is only a small portion of arthropod-pathogenic fungi resources in Vietnam [15]. Throughout the investigations of arthropod-pathogenic fungi in national reserves and Vietnam parks, collections of C. militaris attacking lepidopteran pupae or larvae were located in the soil or on the leaf litter. The collections have various phenotypic characters, including numbers and lengths of stromata, and shapes and colors of fertile parts. Consequently, in the present study, it was hypothesized that C. militaris from Vietnam is a species complex. This study aims to clarify the hidden species in C. militaris via molecular phylogenetic studies and to combine molecular analyses with observations of diagnostic morphological characters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection and Fungus Isolation

Fungus-infected insect specimens were collected in two locations in Sa Pa District, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam. The specimens were collected by carefully unearthing their hosts with a scoop and then placing the samples in sterile bags. The collection site information was documented, including the altitude, longitude, latitude, and habitat type. Teleomorph specimens were rinsed with tap water, washed with sterile distilled water, and then dried on sterile filter paper. A mass of ascospores and asci was removed from the perithecia with a fine needle and placed in a drop of sterile water, which was then stirred with a needle to evenly distribute the elements on the slide. To acquire monospore cultures, a portion of the drop containing ascospores was placed on plates of potato dextrose agar (PDA; potato 200 g/L, dextrose 20 g/L, agar 20 g/L) using a sterile micropipette, and then the Petri dish was incubated at 25 °C. The purified fungal strains were maintained in a culture room at 25 °C or were transferred to PDA slants and stored at 4 °C. Voucher specimens and the corresponding isolated strains were deposited in the Yunnan Herbal Herbarium (YHH) and the Yunnan Fungal Culture Collection (YFCC), respectively, of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

2.2. Morphological Observations

Macro-morphological characteristics, including the host, fungi location, color and shape of the stromata, and perithecial orientation (superficial, immersed, or semi-immersed; ordinal or oblique), were examined under a dissecting microscope (SZ61, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Cultures on slants were transferred to PDA plates and cultured in an incubator for 14 days at 25 °C. The cultures were observed for the comparison of important morphological characters, including the conidial arrangement, phialides, and colony pigmentation. For morphological evaluation, microscope slides were prepared by placing mycelia from the cultures on PDA blocks (5 mm diameter) and then they were overlaid with a coverslip. Medan dye solution was used to observe asci and ascospores. Other structures were mounted in water. The sizes and shapes of the asexual morphological characteristics, including the conidiophores, phialides, and conidia, were determined using a light microscope (CX40, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200 FEG, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.3. DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and Sequencing

Specimens and live axenic cultures were prepared for DNA extraction to ensure that both represented the same species. Genomic DNA was extracted with a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) based on the manufacturer’s protocol. The primer pair nrSSU-CoF and nrSSU-CoR [16] was used to amplify the nuclear ribosomal small subunit (nrSSU); the primer pair LR5 and LR0R [17,18] was used to amplify the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU); and the primer pair EF1α-EF and EF1α-ER [12,19] was used to amplify the translation elongation factor 1α (TEF). For amplification of the largest and second-largest subunits of RNA polymerase II (RPB1 and RPB2), the PCR primer pairs RPB1-5′F/RPB1-5′R and RPB2-5′F/RPB2-5′R [12,19] were employed. The primers used for PCR amplification of nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All of the PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 50 μL containing 25 μL 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 0.5 μL of every primer (10 μM), 1 μL of genomic DNA, and 23 μL of RNase-Free water. The PCR products were sequenced by Beijing Sinogenomax Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were based on the sequences of five loci (nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2). All of the sequences, which were retrieved from GenBank, were combined with those generated in the study. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/ (accessed on 20 April 2023)). The aligned sequences were then manually corrected where necessary. Following sequence alignment, the aligned sequences of five genes were concatenated. A partition homogeneity test was performed with PAUP * 4.0a166 [20], and the result revealed that there was no significant conflict among the different data partitions. The PartitionFinder V2.0.0 program was used to identify five data partitions, including one for both nrSSU and nrLSU, and four for each of the three codon positions for the protein-coding genes TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 [21]: Partition 1—nrSSU and nrLSU; Partition 2—TEF_pos1 and TEF_pos2; Partition 3—RPB1_pos1 and RPB2_pos1; Partition 4—RPB1_pos2 and RPB2_pos2; and Partition 5—TEF_pos3, RPB1_pos3, and RPB2_pos3. The best substitution models of these five partitions were calculated with jModelTest version 2.1.4 [22]. The GTR + G + I model was used for the partitions of nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF_pos1, TEF_pos2, TEF_pos3, RPB1_pos3, and RPB2_pos3, and the GTR + I model was used for partitions of RPB1_pos1, RPB1_pos2, RPB2_pos1, and RPB2_pos2. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses were conducted in RaxML 7.0.3 [23] with the recommended partition parameters, and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates were performed on the dataset. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted using MrBayes v3.1.2 for five million generations with the GTR + G + I model, and the model was employed separately for each of the five gene partitions [24].

3. Results

3.1. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analyses

The analyzed data matrix employed to construct the phylogeny of Cordyceps species included sequences from 102 samples (Table 1). Liangia sinensis YFCC 3103 and L. sinensis YFCC 3104 were utilized as outgroups. The final dataset consisted of 4627 bp of sequence data, including gaps (nrSSU 1060 bp, nrLSU 877 bp, TEF 999 bp, RPB1 719 bp, and RPB2 972 bp). Both the BI and ML analyses produced trees with similar topologies that resolved the majority of the Cordyceps lineages in separate terminal branches (Figure 1). The phylogenetic trees indicated that these were identical in overall topologies with the findings of prior work [25,26] and revealed the species diversity of the C. militaris complex in Cordyceps clades. The analyses also revealed that two newly discovered species, C. polystromata and C. sapaensis, were phylogenetically clustered with C. chaetoclavata (H. Yu et al.), C. inthanonensis (Mongkols. et al.), and C. rosea (Kobayasi and Shimizu), but they were distinguished from the latter three by forming two separate branches in the C. militaris complex. These results indicated that the C. militaris complex should be composed of 11 species, namely, C. chaetoclavata, C. inthanonensis, C. kyusyuensis Kawam., C. militaris, C. ningxiaensis (T. Bau and J.Q. Yan), C. oncoperae (P.J. Wright), C. polystromata, C. rosea, C. roseostromata (Kobayasi and Shimizu), C. sapaensis, and C. shuifuensis H. Yu et al.
Table 1. Specimen information and GenBank accession numbers for sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Specimen information and GenBank accession numbers for sequences used in this study.
Species ListVoucher
Information
Host/SubstrateGenBank Accession NumberReference
nrSSUnrLSUTEFRPB1RPB2
Cordyceps albocitrinusspat 07-174 MF416575 MF416467MF416629 [27]
Cordyceps amoene-roseaCBS 107.73ColeopteraAY526464MF416550MF416494MF416651MF416445[27,28]
Cordyceps amoene-roseaCBS 729.73ColeopteraMF416604MF416551MF416495MF416652MF416446[27,28]
Cordyceps araneaeBCC 85065Arachnid MT003037MT017850MT017810MT017828[29]
Cordyceps araneaeBCC 85066Arachnid MT003038MT017851MT017811MT017829[29]
Cordyceps araneaeBCC 88291Arachnid MT003039MT017852MT017812MT017830[29]
Cordyceps bifusisporaspat 08-129LepidopteraMF416576MF416523MF416468MF416630 [27]
Cordyceps bifusisporaspat 08-133.1LepidopteraMF416577MF416524MF416469MF416631MF416434[27]
Cordyceps bifusisporaEFCC 5690LepidopteraEF468952EF468806EF468746EF468854EF468909[12]
Cordyceps bifusisporaEFCC 8260LepidopteraEF468953EF468807EF468747EF468855EF468910[12]
Cordyceps blackwelliaeTBRC 7255Lepidoptera MF140703MF140823MF140772MF140796[30]
Cordyceps blackwelliaeTBRC 7256Coleoptera MF140702MF140822MF140771MF140795[30]
Cordyceps blackwelliaeYFCC 856LepidopteraMW181780MW173992MW168233MW168199MW168216[31]
Cordyceps brevistromaBCC 78209Lepidoptera MT003044MT017855MT017817MT017835[29]
Cordyceps brevistromaBCC 79253Lepidoptera MT003045MT017856MT017836[29]
Cordyceps buttonsporaYFCC 8400LepidopteraOL468555OL468575OL473523OL739569OL473534[25]
Cordyceps buttonsporaYFCC 8401LepidopteraOL468556OL468576OL473524OL739570OL473535[25]
Cordyceps caloceroidesMCA 2249AraneaeMF416578MF416525MF416470MF416632 [27]
Cordyceps cateniannulataCBS 152.83ColeopteraAY526465MG665226JQ425687 [30,32]
Cordyceps cateniobliquaYFCC 3367ColeopteraMN576765MN576821MN576991MN576881MN576935[26]
Cordyceps cateniobliquaYFCC 5935LepidopteraMN576766MN576822MN576992MN576882MN576936[26]
Cordyceps cateniobliquaCBS 153.83LepidopteraAY526466 JQ425688 MG665236[30,32]
Cordyceps cf. ochraceostromataARSEF 5691LepidopteraEF468964EF468819EF468759EF468867EF468921[12]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaspat 08-115LepidopteraMF416586MF416532MF416476MF416635MF416439[27]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaspat 09-021LepidopteraMF416587MF416533MF416477MF416636 [27]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaNHJ 10627LepidopteraEF468967EF468822EF468763EF468870 [12]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaNHJ 10684LepidopteraEF468968EF468823EF468761EF468871 [12]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaEFCC 5693LepidopteraEF468966EF468821EF468762EF468869 [12]
Cordyceps cf. pruinosaEFCC 5197LepidopteraEF468965EF468820EF468760EF468868 [12]
Cordyceps cf. takaomontanaNHJ 12623LepidopteraEF468984EF468838EF468778EF468884EF468932[12]
Cordyceps chaetoclavataYHH 15101LepidopteraMN576722MN576778MN576948MN576838MN576894[26]
Cordyceps chiangdaoensisBCC 68469Coleoptera MF140732KT261403 [30,33]
Cordyceps chiangdaoensisYFCC 857ColeopteraMW181781MW173993MW168234MW168200MW168217[31]
Cordyceps cicadaeGACP 07071701HemipteraMK761207MK761212MK770631 [34]
Cordyceps cicadaeRCEF HP090724-31HemipteraMF416605MF416552MF416496MF416653MF416447[27]
Cordyceps cocoonihabitaYFCC 3415LepidopteraMN576723MN576779MN576949MN576839MN576895[26]
Cordyceps cocoonihabitaYFCC 3416LepidopteraMN576724MN576780MN576950MN576840MN576896[26]
Cordyceps coleopterorumCBS 110.73ColeopteraJF415965JF415988JF416028JN049903JF416006[35]
Cordyceps exasperataMCA 2288LepidopteraMF416592MF416538MF416482MF416639 [27]
Cordyceps farinosaCBS 111113AY526474MF416554MF416499MF416656MF416450[27,32]
Cordyceps fumosoroseaYFCC 4561LepidopteraMN576761MN576817MN576987MN576877MN576931[26]
Cordyceps fumosoroseaCBS 244.31ButterMF416609MF416557MF416503MF416660MF416454[27]
Cordyceps fumosoroseaCBS 375.70Food MF416501MF416658MF416452[27]
Cordyceps fumosoroseaCBS 107.10 MG665227HM161735 MG665237[28]
Cordyceps grylliMFLU 17-1023OrthopteraMK863048MK863055MK860193 Unpublished
Cordyceps grylliMFLU 17-1024OrthopteraMK863049MK863056MK860194 Unpublished
Cordyceps inthanonensisBCC 79828Lepidoptera MT017854MT017816MT017833[29]
Cordyceps inthanonensisBCC 56302Lepidoptera MT003040MT017853MT017814MT017831[29]
Cordyceps inthanonensisBCC 55812Lepidoptera MT003041MT017815MT017832[29]
Cordyceps jakajanicolaBCC 79816Hemiptera MN275696MN338479MN338484MN338489[36]
Cordyceps jakajanicolaBCC 79817Hemiptera MN275697MN338480MN338485MN338490[36]
Cordyceps javanicaTBRC 7259Lepidoptera MF140711MF140831MF140780MF140804[30]
Cordyceps javanicaCBS 134.22ColeopteraMF416610MF416558MF416504MF416661MF416455[27]
Cordyceps kuiburiensisBCC 90322Araneidae MK968816MK988032MK988030 [36]
Cordyceps kuiburiensisBCC 90323Araneidae MK968817MK988033MK988031 [36]
Cordyceps kyusyuensisEFCC 5886LepidopteraEF468960EF468813EF468754EF468863EF468917[12]
Cordyceps lepidopterorumTBRC 7263Lepidoptera MF140699MF140819MF140768MF140792[30]
Cordyceps lepidopterorumTBRC 7264Lepidoptera MF140700MF140820MF140769MF140793[30]
Cordyceps longiphialideYFCC 8402rotted woodOL468557OL468577OL473525OL739571OL473536[25]
Cordyceps longiphialideYFCC 8403rotted woodOL468558OL468578OL473526OL739572OL473537[25]
Cordyceps militarisYFCC 6587LepidopteraMN576762MN576818MN576988MN576878MN576932[26]
Cordyceps militarisYFCC 5840LepidopteraMN576763MN576819MN576989MN576879MN576933[26]
Cordyceps morakotiiBCC 55820Hymenoptera MF140730KT261399 [33]
Cordyceps morakotiiBCC 68398Hymenoptera MF140731KT261398 [33]
Cordyceps nabanheensisYFCC 8409LepidopteraOL468564OL468584OL473532OL739578OL473543[25]
Cordyceps nabanheensisYFCC 8410LepidopteraOL468565OL468585OL473533OL739579OL473544[25]
Cordyceps neopruinosaBCC 91361Lepidoptera MT003047MT017858 MT017838[29]
Cordyceps neopruinosaBCC 91362Lepidoptera MT003048MT017859MT017818MT017839[29]
Cordyceps nidusHUA 186125AraneaeKC610778KC610752KC610722 KC610711[37]
Cordyceps nidusHUA 186186AraneaeKY360301KC610753KC610723KY360297 [37]
Cordyceps ninchukisporaEGS 38.165PlantEF468991EF468846EF468795EF468900 [12]
Cordyceps ninchukisporaEGS 38.166PlantEF468992EF468847EF468794EF468901 [12]
Cordyceps ningxiaensisHMJAU 25074Diptera KF309671 [38]
Cordyceps ningxiaensisHMJAU 25076Diptera KF309673 [38]
Cordyceps nototenuipesYFCC 8404LepidopteraOL468559OL468579OL473527OL739573OL473538[25]
Cordyceps nototenuipesYFCC 8405LepidopteraOL468560OL468580OL473528OL739574OL473539[25]
Cordyceps oncoperaeARSEF 4358LepidopteraAF339581AF339532EF468785EF468891EF468936[12,39]
Cordyceps polyarthraMCA 996LepidopteraMF416597MF416543MF416487MF416644 [27]
Cordyceps polyarthraMCA 1009LepidopteraMF416598MF416544MF416488MF416645 [27]
Cordyceps polystromataYFCC 1610885LepidopteraOQ878491OQ878487OQ868508OQ868514OQ868511This study
Cordyceps polystromataYFCC 1610886LepidopteraOQ878492OQ878488OQ868509OQ868515OQ868512This study
Cordyceps pruinosaARSEF 5413LepidopteraAY184979AY184968DQ522351DQ522397DQ522451[40]
Cordyceps qingchengensisMFLU 17-1022LepidopteraMK761206MK761211MK770630 [34]
Cordyceps roseaspat 09-053LepidopteraMF416590MF416536MF416480MF416637MF416442[27]
Cordyceps roseostromataARSEF 4871ColeopteraAF339573AF339523 [39]
Cordyceps sapaensisYFCC 5833LepidopteraMN576764MN576820MN576990MN576880MN576934[26]
Cordyceps sapaensisYFCC 1610884LepidopteraOQ878490OQ878486OQ868507OQ868513OQ868510This study
Cordyceps shuifuensisYFCC 5230LepidopteraMN576721MN576777MN576947MN576837MN576893[26]
Cordyceps simaoensisYFCC 8406LepidopteraOL468561OL468581OL473529OL739575OL473540[25]
Cordyceps simaoensisYFCC 8407LepidopteraOL468562OL468582OL473530OL739576OL473541[25]
Cordyceps simaoensisYFCC 8408LepidopteraOL468563OL468583OL473531OL739577OL473542[25]
Cordyceps sp.CBS 102184ArachnidAF339613AF339564EF468803EF468907EF468948[12,39]
Cordyceps sp.EFCC 2535ColeopteraEF468980EF468835EF468772 [12]
Cordyceps spegazziniiARSF 7850Diptera DQ196435 [41]
Cordyceps subtenuipesYFCC 6051LepidopteraMN576719MN576775MN576945MN576835MN576891[26]
Cordyceps subtenuipesYFCC 6084LepidopteraMN576720MN576776MN576946MN576836MN576892[26]
Cordyceps succavusMFLU 18-1890LepidopteraMK086058MK086062 MK084616MK079353[42]
Cordyceps tenuipesARSEF 5135LepidopteraMF416612JF415980JF416020JN049896JF416000[27,35]
Cordyceps tenuipesYFCC 4266LepidopteraMN576774MN576830MN577000MN576890MN576944[26]
Cordyceps yinjiangensisYJ06221Hymenoptera MT577003 MT577002[43]
Liangia sinensisYFCC 3103FungiMN576726MN576782MN576952MN576842MN576898[26]
Liangia sinensisYFCC 3104FungiMN576727MN576783MN576953MN576843MN576899[26]
Boldface: data generated in this study.
Figure 1. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using the Bayesian Inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) method based on combined nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 sequence data. Liangia sinensis YFCC 3103 and L. sinensis YFCC 3104 were used as outgroups. Statistical support values (≥0.7/70%) are shown at the nodes for BI posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap support. Isolates in bold type are those analyzed in this study.
Figure 1. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using the Bayesian Inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) method based on combined nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 sequence data. Liangia sinensis YFCC 3103 and L. sinensis YFCC 3104 were used as outgroups. Statistical support values (≥0.7/70%) are shown at the nodes for BI posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap support. Isolates in bold type are those analyzed in this study.
Jof 09 00676 g001

3.2. Morphological Features

The morphological characteristics of the three Cordyceps species as well as photomicrographs of morphological structures are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4. Detailed fungal morphological descriptions are provided in the Taxonomy section.

3.3. Taxonomy

Cordyceps militaris (Linnaeus) Fries, Observationes Mycologicae 2: 317 (cancellans) (1818), Figure 2.
MycoBank: MB 237604.
Clavaria militaris Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 2: 1182 (1753)
(Basionym)
Sexual morph: Stromata solitary or in groups of 2–3, arising from lepidopteran pupae or larvae buried in soil, cylindrical to clavate, 1.5–9.0 cm long (n = 10). Stipes cylindrical, yellowish to orange. Fertile parts clavate, yellowish, reddish-orange, 8–45 × 3.4–6.5 mm (n = 10); the perithecial area completely covering the terminal portion of the stroma. Perithecia ovoid, orange to reddish-orange, loosely packed, semi-immersed, 230–556 × 113–319 µm (n = 50). Asci cylindrical, 200.0–480.6 × 2.9–4.7 µm (n = 50), with a hemispheric apical cap of 3.1–4.5 × 1.8–3.2 µm (n = 50). Ascospores filiform, multiseptate, finally breaking into one-celled part-spores, 1.8–4.2 × 0.7–1.6 µm.
Asexual morph: Colonies on PDA fast-growing, 40–45 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white to yellow, cottony, with protuberant mycelial density at the centrum, reverse yellowish to orange. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 0.9–2.4 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, solitary, cylindrical, 3.2–22.5 × 1.4–3.0 µm (n = 50). Phialides exist in two types, namely, Verticillium- and Paecilomyces-phialides. Phialides verticillate on conidiophores, solitary or verticillate on hyphae, Verticillium-phialides cylindrical to subulate, 2.8–29.5 × 0.8–3.4 μm (n = 50); Paecilomyces-phialides swollen or cylindrical at the base tapering to the apex, 5.8–16.5 × 1.4–3.1 μm (n = 50). Conidia in chains or heads, hyaline, smooth-walled, one-celled, subglobose to ellipsoidal, 1.8–5.6 × 1.4–3.2 µm (n = 100).
Host: Pupa and larva of Lepidoptera.
Habitat: In the soil of evergreen broad-leaf forests, evergreen defoliated broadleaf mixed forests, and coniferous forests.
Distribution: Worldwide.
Material examined: Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District (22°21′4″ N, 103°46′29″ E, 1931 m above sea level), on pupae and larvae of Lepidoptera buried in forest soil, 30 October 2016, collected by Hong Yu (YHH 933–YHH 944, YHH 5840; living culture: YFCC 933–YFCC 944, YFCC 5840).
Notes: Cordyceps militaris is characterized by solitary or several stromata, yellowish to reddish-orange fertile parts, semi-immersed and ovoid perithecia, cylindrical asci, filiform ascospores with multi-septa, short part-spores (https://www.mycobank.org, accessed on 20 April 2023), circular colonies with white to yellow colors, Verticillium-like and Paecilomyces-like asexual conidiogenous structures, and on the pupae or larvae of Lepidoptera buried in soil [44].
The strain (YFCC 5840) isolated from the pupa of Lepidoptera from Vietnam formed a well-supported clade with a known C. militaris isolate (YFCC 6587) (Figure 1). According to microscopic observation, the strain YFCC 5840 showed typical morphological characteristics found in isolates of C. militaris. Both the morphological study and phylogenetic analyses supported the isolate YFCC 5840 as being C. militaris.
Figure 2. Morphology of Cordyceps militaris. (A,B) Perithecial stromata as encountered in the field; (C) Stroma arising from lepidopteran pupa; (D) The host of Cordyceps militaris; (E) Surface of the fertile structure of perithecial stroma showing emerging apical parts of semi-immersed perithecia; (F,G) Perithecia; (H,I) Asci; (J,K) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (LP) Phialides and conidia ((L,O): Verticillium-type; (M,N,P): Isaria-type). Scale bars: (A,B,D,J,K) = 10 mm; (E) = 500 μm; (F) = 200 μm; (G) = 100 μm; (H,I,L) = 20 μm; (M,O,P) = 10 μm; (N) = 5 μm.
Figure 2. Morphology of Cordyceps militaris. (A,B) Perithecial stromata as encountered in the field; (C) Stroma arising from lepidopteran pupa; (D) The host of Cordyceps militaris; (E) Surface of the fertile structure of perithecial stroma showing emerging apical parts of semi-immersed perithecia; (F,G) Perithecia; (H,I) Asci; (J,K) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (LP) Phialides and conidia ((L,O): Verticillium-type; (M,N,P): Isaria-type). Scale bars: (A,B,D,J,K) = 10 mm; (E) = 500 μm; (F) = 200 μm; (G) = 100 μm; (H,I,L) = 20 μm; (M,O,P) = 10 μm; (N) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 00676 g002
Cordyceps polystromata H. Yu bis, Y. Wang & Q.Y. Dong, sp. nov., Figure 3.
MycoBank: MB 848568.
Etymology: The epithet ‘polystromata’ refers to the numerous stromata.
Diagnosis: Differs from C. militaris and C. rosea in abundant reddish-orange stromata, superficial perithecia, and smaller ovoid to ellipsoidal conidia (1.5–3.7 × 1.2–2.5 µm).
Type: Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District (22°21′7″ N, 103°46′48″ E, 1931 m above sea level), on a larva of Lepidoptera emerging from the leaf litter on the forest floor, 26 October 2016, Hong Yu (holotype: YHH 1610885; ex-type living culture: YFCC 1610885).
Sexual morph: Stromata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran larvae, gregarious, unbranched, 10–17 mm long. Stipe cylindrical, 4–11 mm long, 1.5–4.2 mm in diameter, orange to reddish-orange, fleshy. The fertile part is cylindrical to clavate, reddish-orange, covered by a spinous surface, 3–14 × 1.6–3.5 mm; the perithecial area fully covers the terminal portion of the stroma. Perithecia superficial, ovoid, reddish-orange, 522–663 × 296–577 µm (n = 50). Asci 8-spored, cylindrical, 54.2–172.8 × 4.1–6.5 µm (n = 50), with a hemispheric apical cap of 3.5–6.3 × 2.8–4.7 µm (n = 50). Ascospores filiform, multiseptate, 51.4–170.5 × 0.9–2.6 µm (n = 20), finally breaking into one-celled part-spores, 5.7–7.0 × 1.7–3.2 µm (n = 50).
Asexual morph: Colonies on PDA growing fairly well at 25 °C, 33–35 mm in 14 days, white to pale yellow, with high mycelial density, reverse yellowish to orange. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 2.1–3.7 μm wide. Conidiophores cylindrical, hyaline, smooth-walled, solitary or verticillate, 6.1–43.7 × 1.5–2.9 µm (n = 50). Phialides verticillate, in whorls of 2–5, sometimes solitary on hyphae, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, 6.2–17.2 × 0.9–2.7 μm (n = 50). Conidia one-celled, hyaline, smooth-walled, ovoid to ellipsoidal, 1.5–3.7 × 1.2–2.5 µm (n = 100). Chlamydospores were not observed.
Other material examined: Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien National Park (22°21′10″ N, 103°46′29″ E, 1989 m above sea level), on a larva of Lepidoptera emerging from the leaf litter on the forest floor, 28 October 2016, Hong Yu (paratype: YHH 1610886; ex-paratype living culture: YFCC 1610886).
Host: Larva of Lepidoptera.
Habitat: The hosts were found in the leaf litter on the forest floor.
Distribution: At present, known only in Sa Pa District, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam.
Notes: Cordyceps polystromata is characterized by abundant reddish-orange stromata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran larvae, reddish-orange fertile parts, superficial and ovoid perithecia, cylindrical asci, filiform ascospores with multi-septa, cylindrical part-spores, circular colonies with white to pale yellow colors, and Paecilomyces-like asexual conidiogenous structures. It is phylogenetically clustered with C. chaetoclavata, C. inthanonensis, C. rosea, and C. sapaensis, but it is distinguished from the four latter species by forming a separate clade in this group (Figure 1). Morphologically, species in this group produce part-spores, except for C. rosea, which produces whole ascospores with septations [45]. Among them, only three species, namely, C. chaetoclavata, C. polystromata, and C. sapaensis, have superficial perithecia [26]. Ecologically, C. inthanonensis, C. polystromata, and C. rosea were found to occur on lepidopteran larvae, while C. chaetoclavata and C. sapaensis were found on lepidopteran pupae buried in soil [26,29,45].
Macro-morphologically, C. polystromata is very similar to C. inthanonensis [29]. They have the same abundant orange to reddish-orange stromata, cylindrical to clavate fertile parts, and host of lepidopteran larvae. However, morphological observation reveals a significant difference in conidia sizes between C. polystromata (1.5–3.7 × 1.2–2.5 µm) and C. inthanonensis (4–7(9) × 1.5–2 μm). Cordyceps polystromata can also be distinguished from C. inthanonensis by shorter cylindrical asci (54.2–172.8 × 4.1–6.5 µm).
Figure 3. Morphology of Cordyceps polystromata. (A,B) Stromata arising from the host of lepidopteran larvae; (C,D) Fertile part; (E) Perithecia; (F,G) Asci; (H) Ascospores; (I) Part-spores; (J,K) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (LO) Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia. Scale bars: (A,B,J,K) = 10 mm; (C,D) = 500 μm; (E) = 200 μm; (FH) = 50 μm; (I) = 10 μm; (LO) = 5 μm.
Figure 3. Morphology of Cordyceps polystromata. (A,B) Stromata arising from the host of lepidopteran larvae; (C,D) Fertile part; (E) Perithecia; (F,G) Asci; (H) Ascospores; (I) Part-spores; (J,K) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (LO) Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia. Scale bars: (A,B,J,K) = 10 mm; (C,D) = 500 μm; (E) = 200 μm; (FH) = 50 μm; (I) = 10 μm; (LO) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 00676 g003
Cordyceps sapaensis H. Yu bis, Y. Wang & Q.Y. Dong, sp. nov., Figure 4.
MycoBank: MB 848569.
Etymology: Named after the location of Sa Pa District where the species was collected.
Diagnosis: Cordyceps sapaensis can be distinguished by clavate stromata with banana-shaped fertile parts, large superficial perithecia (587–743 × 341–396 µm), cylindrical phialides (conidiogenous cells), and large ellipsoidal to cylindrical conidia (2.6–7.4 × 1.1–3.1 µm).
Type: Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien National Park (22°19′30″ N, 103°46′50″ E, 2178 m above sea level), on a pupa of Lepidoptera buried in soil, 28 October 2016, Hong Yu (holotype: YHH 1610884; ex-type living culture: YFCC 1610884).
Sexual morph: Stromata arising from pupae of Lepidoptera buried in soil, solitary, unbranched, 18–35 mm long. The stipe is cylindrical, 15–21 mm long, 2.8–4.3 mm in diameter, yellowish to orange, and fleshy. The fertile part is banana-shaped, yellowish, reddish-orange, 8–15 × 3.3–4.8 mm; the perithecial area completely covers the terminal portion of the stroma. Perithecia superficial, crowded, ovoid, reddish-orange, 587–743 × 341–396 µm (n = 50). Asci 8-spored, cylindrical, 237.2–472.6 × 3.1–5.4 µm (n = 50), with a hemispheric apical cap of 2.5–4.3 × 1.6–2.8 µm (n = 50). Ascospores filiform, multiseptate, 230.2–457.8 × 1.6–2.1 µm (n = 20), finally breaking into one-celled part-spores, 2.0–4.8 × 1.3–2.2 µm (n = 50).
Asexual morph: Colonies on PDA growing fairly well, attaining a diameter of 34–36 mm after 14 days at 25 °C, white to pale yellow, with high mycelial density, reverse cream to yellow. Hyphae hyaline, branched, smooth-walled, 0.9–3.1 µm wide. Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, sometimes in whorls of 2–5, basal portion cylindrical, tapering gradually toward the apex; 5.1–28.5 µm long, 1.5–3.1 µm wide at the base, and 1.3–2.1 µm wide at the apex (n = 50). Conidia one-celled, hyaline, smooth-walled, ellipsoidal to cylindrical, 2.6–7.4 × 1.1–3.1 µm (n = 100). Chlamydospores present, one-celled, solitary, eggplant-shaped or oval to pyriform, hyaline becoming brown, thick, and smooth-walled.
Other material examined: Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District (22°21′6″ N, 103°46′41″ E, 1948 m above sea level), on a pupa of Lepidoptera buried in soil, 26 October 2016, Hong Yu (paratype: YHH 5833; ex-paratype living culture: YFCC 5833).
Host: Pupa of Lepidoptera.
Habitat: In the soil of evergreen broad-leaf forests.
Distribution: At present, known only in Sa Pa District, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam.
Notes: Regarding phylogenetic relationships, C. sapaensis forms a distinct lineage in the C. militaris complex, and it is closely related to C. chaetoclavata, C. inthanonensis, C. polystromata, and C. rosea (Figure 1). Morphologically, C. sapaensis is similar to C. chaetoclavata and C. rosea by sharing single, unbranched, fleshy, and cylindrical stipes, and yellowish to reddish-orange stromata. According to the original description of C. chaetoclavata, it has spinous fertile parts and superficial lageniform perithecia (402–610 × 280–427 µm) [26]. However, C. sapaensis differs from C. chaetoclavata by its banana-shaped fertile parts and longer superficial perithecia with an ovoid shape (587–743 × 341–396 µm). Additionally, our morphological observation reveals a significant difference between C. rosea and C. sapaensis. Cordyceps rosea has rose stromata (11 mm long), immersed perithecia, and the host of lepidopteran larvae [45], whereas C. sapaensis has longer stromata (18–35 mm long) with yellowish to orange colors, superficial perithecia, and the host of lepidopteran pupae.
Figure 4. Morphology of Cordyceps sapaensis. (A) Fungus on the pupa of Lepidoptera; (B) Perithecia; (C,D) Asci; (E,F) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (GK,M,N) Phialides and conidia; (L,O) Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (A,E,F) = 10 mm; (B) = 200 µm; (D,GO) = 10 µm; (C) = 5 µm.
Figure 4. Morphology of Cordyceps sapaensis. (A) Fungus on the pupa of Lepidoptera; (B) Perithecia; (C,D) Asci; (E,F) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium; (GK,M,N) Phialides and conidia; (L,O) Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (A,E,F) = 10 mm; (B) = 200 µm; (D,GO) = 10 µm; (C) = 5 µm.
Jof 09 00676 g004

4. Discussion

The phylogenetic and morphological analyses presented here strongly supported the hypothesis that the fungal materials collected in Vietnam belonged to C. militaris and two hidden species in the C. militaris complex. The molecular phylogeny showed well-supported clades for Cordyceps, thereby supporting the descriptions of C. polystromata (Figure 3) and C. sapaensis (Figure 4) as new taxa, as well as C. militaris (Figure 2) as a known species.
In the C. militaris complex, the macromorphology of numerous species is similar, which could easily lead to misidentification. Cordyceps chaetoclavata, C. militaris, C. ningxiaensis, C. oncoperae, C. rosea, C. roseostromata, C. sapaensis, and C. shuifuensis shared numerous similar morphological characteristics of sexual morphs, viz., single, fleshy, and cylindrical stipes; yellowish, orange to reddish stromata; cylindrical asci with thickened ascus apex; and filiform and multiseptate ascospores [26,38,45,46,47,48]. Cordyceps inthanonensis and C. polystromata had the same abundant orange to reddish-orange stromata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran larvae, cylindrical to clavate fertile parts, ovoid perithecia, cylindrical asci, filiform ascospores with multi-septa, and cylindrical part-spores [29]. Species in the C. militaris complex were found to occur on lepidopteran pupae or larvae except for C. ningxiaensis (fly pupae) and C. roseostromata (larvae of Coleoptera) [26,29,38,45,46,47,48]. Both the macroscopic and microscopic observations conducted throughout the investigation revealed the extensive overlap in morphological characters and the lack of distinctive phenotypic variation, thus supporting the notion of cryptic species in a species complex.
In the current study, a comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic investigation of the C. militaris complex in Vietnam was conducted. Both the macroscopic and microscopic observation of the collections compared with other known species in the C. militaris complex revealed some obvious differences, although the morphological features overlapped generally, thereby supporting the notion of cryptic species in a species complex (Table 2). The species described in this study were all distinct from other closely related species of Cordyceps; C. militaris had stromata that were usually single or sometimes in groups of 2–3 stromata, semi-immersed and ovoid perithecia, short part-spores, Verticillium-like and Paecilomyces-like asexual conidiogenous structures, and they were found on the pupae or larvae of Lepidoptera buried in soil; C. polystromata produced abundant orange to reddish-orange stromata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran larvae, cylindrical to clavate fertile parts with a spinous surface, superficial ovoid perithecia, and Paecilomyces-like asexual conidiogenous structures; and C. sapaensis had a single yellowish to orange stroma, banana-shaped fertile parts, and longer superficial perithecia with ovoid shape. Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the combined dataset of nrSSU, nrLSU, TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 also supported the existence of the known species and two distinct species in the C. militaris complex (Figure 1), thus emphasizing the importance of morphological and molecular identification.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9060676/s1, Table S1: Primers used in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and Q.-Y.D.; methodology, Y.W.; software, Q.-Y.D.; validation, R.L., Q.F. and D.-E.D.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, Y.W., V.-M.D., Y.-B.W. and H.Y.; resources, V.-M.D. and H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, H.Y.; funding acquisition, H.Y. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31870017 and 32200013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences data obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank. The accession numbers can be found in the article (Table 1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Z.Z.; Luan, F.G.; Hywel-jones Nigel, L.; Zhang, S.L.; Chen, M.J.; Huang, B.; Sun, C.S.; Chen, Z.A.; Li, C.R.; Tan, Y.J.; et al. Biodiversity of cordycipitoid fungi associated with Isaria cicadae Miquel II: Teleomorph discovery and nomenclature of chanhua, an important medicinal fungus in China. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Fan, Q.; Wang, Y.B.; Yu, H. Cordycipitoid Fungi Powders Promote Mycelial Growth and Bioactive-Metabolite Production in Liquid Cultures of the Stout Camphor Medicinal Mushroom Taiwanofungus camphoratus (Agaricomycetes). Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2020, 22, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mascarin, G.M.; Kobori, N.N.; Quintela, E.D.; Delalibera, I.J. The virulence of entomopathogenic fungi against Bemisia tabaci biotype B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and their conidial production using solid substrate fermentation. Biol. Control 2013, 66, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rojas, V.M.A.; Iwanicki, N.S.A.; Alessandro, C.P.; Fatoretto, M.B.; Demétrio, C.G.B.; Delalibera, I.J. Characterization of Brazilian Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates: Conidial production, tolerance to ultraviolet-B radiation, and elevated temperature. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2023, 197, 107888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cui, J.D. Biotechnological production and applications of Cordyceps militaris, a valued traditional Chinese medicine. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lou, H.W.; Lin, J.F.; Guo, L.Q.; Wang, X.W.; Tian, S.Q.; Liu, C.X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, R.Y. Advances in research on Cordyceps militaris degeneration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7835–7841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xia, Y.; Luo, F.; Shang, Y.; Chen, P.; Lu, Y.; Wang, C. Fungal cordycepin biosynthesis is coupled with the production of the safeguard molecule pentostatin. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017, 24, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nurmamat, E.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, Z. Effects of different temperatures on the chemical structure and antitumor activities of polysaccharides from Cordyceps militaris. Polymers 2018, 10, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kunhorm, P.; Chaicharoenaudomrung, N.; Noisa, P. Enrichment of cordycepin for cosmeceutical applications: Culture systems and strategies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1681–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shrestha, B.; Tanaka, E.; Han, J.G.; Oh, J.S.; Han, S.K.; Lee, K.H.; Sung, G.H. A Brief Chronicle of the Genus Cordyceps Fr., the Oldest Valid Genus in Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycota). Mycobiology 2014, 42, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fries, E.M. Observationes Mycologicae Praecipue ad Illustrandam Floram Suecicam; Pars secunda (Cancellans issue); G. Bonnieri: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1818. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sung, G.H.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Sung, J.M.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Shrestha, B.; Spatafora, J.W. Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the clavicipitaceous fungi. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 57, 5–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zou, W.Q.; Tang, D.X.; Xu, Z.H.; Huang, O.; Wang, Y.B.; Tran, N.-L.; Yu, H. Multigene phylogeny and morphology reveal Ophiocordyceps hydrangea sp. nov. and Ophiocordyceps bidoupensis sp. nov. (Ophiocordycipitaceae). MycoKeys 2022, 92, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lao, T.D.; Le, T.A.H.; Truong, N.B. Morphological and genetic characteristics of the novel entomopathogenic fungus Ophiocordyceps langbianensis (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from Lang Biang Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, Z.H.; Tran, N.L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.D.; Dao, V.M.; Nguyen, T.T.; Wang, Y.B.; Yu, H. Phylogeny and morphology of Ophiocordyceps puluongensis sp. nov. (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales), a new fungal pathogen on termites from Vietnam. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2022, 192, 107771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Y.B.; Yu, H.; Dai, Y.D.; Wu, C.K.; Zeng, W.B.; Yuan, F.; Liang, Z.Q. Polycephalomyces agaricus, a new hyperparasite of Ophiocordyceps sp. infecting melolonthid larvae in southwestern China. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Rehner, S.A.; Samuels, G.J. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bischoff, J.F.; Rehner, S.A.; Humber, R.A. Metarhizium frigidum sp. nov.: A cryptic species of M. anisopliae and a member of the M. flavoviride complex. Mycologia 2006, 98, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis USING parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.0a166; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.Q.; Tang, D.X.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Wu, H.J.; Yu, H. Morphology and Phylogeny Reveal Five Novel Species in the Genus Cordyceps (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) From Yunnan, China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 846909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.B.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Q.; Duan, D.E.; Zhang, G.D.; Dai, R.Q.; Dai, Y.D.; Zeng, W.B.; Chen, Z.H.; Li, D.D.; et al. Multigene phylogeny of the family Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales): New taxa and the new systematic position of the Chinese cordycipitoid fungus Paecilomyces hepiali. Fungal Divers. 2020, 103, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kepler, R.M.; Luangsa-Ard, J.J.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Quandt, C.A.; Sung, G.H.; Rehner, S.A.; Aime, M.C.; Henkel, T.W.; Sanjuan, T.; Zare, R.; et al. A phylogenetically-based nomenclature for Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales). IMA Fungus 2017, 8, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Manoch, L.; Samson, R.A. On the relationships of Paecilomyces sect. Isarioidea species. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mongkolsamrit, S.; Noisripoom, W.; Tasanathai, K.; Khonsanit, A.; Thanakitpipattana, D.; Himaman, W.; Kobmoo, N.; Luangsa-ard, J.J. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal cryptic species in Blackwellomyces and Cordyceps (Cordycipitaceae) from Thailand. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 957–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mongkolsamrit, S.; Noisripoom, W.; Thanakitpipattana, D.; Wutikhun, T.; Spatafora, J.W.; Luangsa-ard, J. Disentangling cryptic species with isaria-like morphs in Cordycipitaceae. Mycologia 2018, 110, 230–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Fan, Q.; Wang, D.; Zou, W.Q.; Tang, D.X.; Hongthong, P.; Yu, H. Species Diversity and Virulence Potential of the Beauveria bassiana Complex and Beauveria scarabaeidicola Complex. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 841604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Samson, R.A. The polyphyletic nature of Paecilomyces sensu lato based on 18S-generated rDNA phylogeny. Mycologia 2004, 96, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tasanathai, K.; Thanakitpipattana, D.; Noisripoom, W.; Khonsanit, A.; Kumsao, J.; Luangsa-ard, J.J. Two new Cordyceps species from a community forest in Thailand. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zha, L.S.; Wen, T.C.; Huang, S.K.; Boonmee, S.; Eungwanichayapant, P.D. Taxonomy and biology of Cordyceps qingchengensis sp. nov. and its allies. Phytotaxa 2019, 416, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kepler, R.M.; Sung, G.H.; Ban, S.; Nakagiri, A.; Chen, M.J.; Huang, B.; Li, Z.; Spatafora, J.W. New teleomorph combinations in the entomopathogenic genus Metacordyceps. Mycologia 2012, 104, 182–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Lombard, L.; Roets, F.; Swart, W.J.; Alvarado, P.; Carnegie, A.J.; Moreno, G.; Luangsa-Ard, J.; Thangavel, R.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041. Persoonia 2019, 43, 223–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chirivi, J.; Danies, G.; Sierra, R.; Schauer, N.; Trenkamp, S.; Restrepo, S.; Sanjuan, T. Metabolomic profile and nucleoside composition of Cordyceps nidus sp. nov.(Cordycipitaceae): A new source of active compounds. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yan, J.Q.; Bau, T. Cordyceps ningxiaensis sp. nov., a new species from dipteran pupae in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China. Nova Hedwig. 2015, 100, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sung, G.H.; Spatafora, J.W.; Zare, R.; Gams, W. A revision of Verticillium sect. Prostrata. II. Phylogenetic analyses of SSU and LSU nuclear rDNA sequences from anamorphs and teleomorphs of the Clavicipitaceae. Nova Hedwig. 2001, 72, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spatafora, J.W.; Sung, G.-H.; Sung, G.H.; Hywel-Jones, N.; White, J.F. Phylogenetic evidence for an animal pathogen origin of ergot and the grass endophytes. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torres, M.S.; White, J.; Bischoff, J.F. Cordyceps spegazzinii sp. nov., a new species of the C. militaris group. Mycotaxon 2005, 94, 253–263. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hyde, K.D.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.; Rossi, W.; Leonardi, M.; Lee, H.B.; Mun, H.Y.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2019, 96, 1–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.P.; Chen, W.H.; Han, Y.F.; Liang, J.D.; Liang, Z.Q. Cordyceps yinjiangensis, a new ant-pathogenic fungus. Phytotaxa 2020, 453, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, Z.L.; Yu, H.; Chen, Z.H.; Wang, Y.B. Study on the biological and ecological habits of populations of Cordyceps militaris in middle of Yunnan. Edible Fungi China 2012, 30, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kobayasi, Y.; Shimizu, D. Cordyceps species from Japan 5. Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus. Tokyo Ser. B 1982, 8, 111–123. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kobayasi, Y. Revision of the genus Cordyceps and its allies 1. Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus. Tokyo Ser. B 1981, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kobayasi, Y.; Shimizu, D. Cordyceps species from Japan 6. Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus. Tokyo Ser. B 1983, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wright, P.J. Cordyceps oncoperae sp. nov. (Ascomycota) Infecting Oncopera spp. (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1993, 61, 211–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Morphological comparison of species in the C. militaris complex.
Table 2. Morphological comparison of species in the C. militaris complex.
SpeciesStromata (mm)Fertile Parts (mm)Perithecia (μm)Asci (μm)Ascospores (μm)Part-Spores (μm)Phialides (μm)Conidia (μm)References
Cordyceps chaetoclavataSolitary, 23 × 0.8Clavate, covered by a spinous surface, 5.6 × 0.7–1.1Superficial, 402–610 × 280–427Cylindrical, 274–385 × 3.7–4.8Filiform, multiseptate, 127–260 × 0.9–1.2Cylindrical, 3–12 μm long [26]
Cordyceps inthanonensisMultiple, 6–25 mm longCylindrical to clavate, 3–5 mm wideSemi-immersed, ovoid, 600–720 × 220–420Cylindrical, 450–600 × 4–6Filiform, multiseptate, 400–550 μm longCylindrical, 3–4 × 1–1.5Solitary, cylindrical at the base tapering to the apex, (12)14–18.5(20) × 1.5–3Cylindrical, 4–7(9) × 1.5–2[29]
Cordyceps kyusyuensisMultiple, 15–20 mm longCylindrical, 10–12 mm longSemi-superficial, ovoid, 410–580 × 210–3304 μm wide 4–5 × 1 Ovoid, 2 × 1.5[46]
Cordyceps militarisSolitary or in groups of 2–3, 15–90 mm longClavate, 8–45 × 3.4–6.5Semi-immersed, ovoid, 230–556 × 113–319 µmCylindrical, 200.0–480.6 × 2.9–4.7Filiform, multiseptate1.8–4.2 × 0.7–1.6Solitary or verticillate, Verticillium-type: 2.8–29.5 × 0.8–3.4, Paecilomyces-type: 5.8–16.5 × 1.4–3.1Subglobose to ellipsoidal, 1.8–5.6 × 1.4–3.2This study
Cordyceps ningxiaensis1 to 2 in a groupSpherical to ovoid, 1.2–3 × 1.2–2.8Immersed, ellipsoid to ovoid, 288–400 × 103–240Cylindrical, 168–205 × (3.7–)4.1–5.5(–6.6)Filiform, irregularly multiseptate3.6–7.8 × 1.0–1.4 [38]
Cordyceps oncoperaeSolitary to multiple, up to 35 mm longClavate, usually with acute apices, 4–10 × 2–3Ovoid, 350–410 × 180–230(–380)Cylindrical, (168–)200–224(–256) × (5–)6–6.5Filiform, multiseptate, 104–139 × 1.5–2 [48]
Cordyceps polystromataMultiple, 10–17 mm longCylindrical to clavate, covered by a spinous surface, 3–14 × 1.6–3.5Superficial, ovoid, 522–663 × 296–577Cylindrical, 54.2–172.8 × 4.1–6.5Filiform, multiseptate, 51.4–170.5 × 0.9–2.65.7–7.0 × 1.7–3.2Verticillate, 6.2–17.2 × 0.9–2.7Ovoid to ellipsoidal, 1.5–3.7 × 1.2–2.5This study
Cordyceps roseaSolitary, 11 mm longClavateImmersed, ovoid, 330–380 × 160–230100 × 3–4Filiform, multiseptate, 120 × 1–1.5 Navicular, 4–5 × 1[45]
Cordyceps roseostromataSolitary to multipleSubglobose to clavate, 1.2–5 × 1.5–2.2Superficial, pyriform, 280–300 × 140–1603–3.5 μm wide 4–5 × 1 [47]
Cordyceps sapaensisSolitary, 18–35 mm longBanana-shaped, 8–15 × 3.3–4.8Superficial, crowded, ovoid, 587–743 × 341–396Cylindrical, 237.2–472.6 × 3.1–5.4Filiform, multiseptate, 230.2–457.8 × 1.6–2.12.0–4.8 × 1.3–2.2Solitary or verticillate, cylindrical, 5.1–28.5 µm long, 1.5–3.1 µm wide at the base, 1.3–2.1 µm wide at the apexEllipsoidal to cylindrical, 2.6–7.4 × 1.1–3.1This study
Cordyceps shuifuensisSolitary, 25 mm longClavate, 4 × 1.5Pseudoimmersed, ovoid, 450–620 × 300–430Cylindrical, 275–510 × 3.5–5.2Filiform, multiseptate, 180–410 × 1.2–1.7Cylindrical, 2.8–6.5 μm longSolitary or verticillate, cylindrical or subulate, 4.7–20 um long, 1.1–2.0 μm wide at the base, 0.4–2.1 μm wide at the apexMacroconidia clavate to oblong-ovate, 5.1–11.8 × 1.3–2.4; microconidia globose to ellipsoidal, 1.8–3.0 × 1.6–2.5[26]
Boldface: data generated in this study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Dong, Q.-Y.; Luo, R.; Fan, Q.; Duan, D.-E.; Dao, V.-M.; Wang, Y.-B.; Yu, H. Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Cryptic Species in the Cordyceps militaris Complex from Vietnam. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060676

AMA Style

Wang Y, Dong Q-Y, Luo R, Fan Q, Duan D-E, Dao V-M, Wang Y-B, Yu H. Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Cryptic Species in the Cordyceps militaris Complex from Vietnam. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(6):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yao, Quan-Ying Dong, Run Luo, Qi Fan, Dong-E Duan, Van-Minh Dao, Yuan-Bing Wang, and Hong Yu. 2023. "Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Cryptic Species in the Cordyceps militaris Complex from Vietnam" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 6: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060676

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop