Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: Alternaria alternata: Should We Still Consider This Fungus as a Minor Brother in the Etiology of Respiratory Allergy?
Next Article in Special Issue
Parametarhizium hingganense, a Novel Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Species, Promotes the Growth of Mung Beans and Enhances Resistance to Disease Induced by Rhizoctonia solani
Previous Article in Journal
Citrate Regulates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitochondrial GDP/GTP Carrier (Ggc1p) by Triggering Unidirectional Transport of GTP
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi as Biocontrol Tool against Fusarium Wilt Disease of Tomato Plant
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/jof8080794
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity of Root-Associated Fungi of the Terrestrial Orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis in a Temperate Forest Soil of South-Central Chile

by
Héctor Herrera
1,*,
Tedy Sanhueza
1,2,
Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares
3,
Francisco Matus
4,5,
Guillermo Pereira
6,
Cristian Atala
7,
María de la Luz Mora
8 and
Cesar Arriagada
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Biorremediación, Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
2
Programa de Magister en Manejo de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Casilla 54-D, Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile
3
Instituto Tecnologico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva 955, Belém 66055-090, PA, Brazil
4
Laboratory of Conservation and Dynamics of Volcanic Soils, Department of Chemical Sciences and Natural Resources, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
5
Network for Extreme Environmental Research (NEXER), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
6
Departamento de Ciencias y Tecnología Vegetal, Laboratorio Biotecnología de Hongos, Universidad de Concepción, Los Angeles 4440000, Chile
7
Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 2340000, Chile
8
Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(8), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080794
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 23 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beneficial Plant–Fungal Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The diversity of orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF) and other beneficial root-associated fungi in temperate forests has scarcely been examined. This study aimed to analyze the diversity of mycorrhizal and rhizosphere-associated fungal communities in the terrestrial orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis growing in high-orchid-population-density areas in the piedmont of the Andes Cordillera with native forest (Nothofagus-Araucaria) and Coastal Cordillera with an exotic plantation (Pinus-Eucalyptus) in south-central Chile. We focused on rhizosphere-inhabiting and peloton-associated OMF in a native forest (Andes Cordillera) and a mixed forest (Coastal Cordillera). The native terrestrial orchids G. lutea and C. collicensis were localized, mycorrhizal root segments were taken to isolate peloton-associated OMF, and rhizosphere soil was taken to perform the metabarcoding approach. The results revealed that Basidiomycota and Ascomycota were the main rhizosphere-inhabiting fungal phyla, showing significant differences in the composition of fungal communities in both sites. Sebacina was the most-abundant OMF genera in the rhizosphere of G. lutea growing in the native forest soil. In contrast, Thanatephorus was the most abundant mycorrhizal taxa growing in the rhizosphere of orchids from the Coastal Cordillera. Besides, other OMF genera such as Inocybe, Tomentella, and Mycena were detected. The diversity of OMF in pelotons differed, being mainly related to Ceratobasidium sp. and Tulasnella sp. These results provide evidence of differences in OMF from pelotons and the rhizosphere soil in G. lutea growing in the Andes Cordillera and a selection of microbial communities in the rhizosphere of C. collicensis in the Coastal Cordillera. This raises questions about the efficiency of propagation strategies based only on mycorrhizal fungi obtained by culture-dependent methods, especially in orchids that depend on non-culturable taxa for seed germination and plantlet development.

1. Introduction

The widespread Orchidaceae family interacts with specific soil-inhabiting fungi, establishing in orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis. This symbiosis is essential in the initial developmental stages of most orchids, as their seeds are tiny (<1 mm), with insufficient reserves to sustain seed germination by themselves [1,2]. At this stage, compatible orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF) provide essential nutrients to the orchid embryo for seed germination and benefit the initial plantlet stage [3,4,5]. The nutrient transfer between orchids and fungi is considered an aggressive process in which hyphae are often decomposed by hydrolytic enzymes releasing nutrients (mycoheterotrophy) [6,7]. At plant maturity, some orchids maintain associations with the OMF active at the seed germination stage [8], whereas others can change mycorrhizal partners to other fungal taxa [9,10].
Terrestrial autotrophic orchids are often associated with mycorrhizal taxa from the Tulasnellaceae, Ceratobasidiaceae, and Serendipitaceae families [11]. Still, they can also interact with diverse phyla, including saprophytic, endophytic, and some commonly accepted phytopathogens [12,13,14]. The mycorrhizal fungus associated with an orchid usually depends on the species and is influenced by the orchid’s developmental stage, environmental conditions, and surrounding plants [15,16]. Therefore, knowing the diversity of fungal taxa inhabiting the orchid rhizosphere provides essential information to identify critical symbionts and fungi with crucial roles in plant growth, stress tolerance, and establishment. Furthermore, the dynamic of specific OMF and other beneficial fungal taxa in the plant rhizosphere can provide clues to understanding the ecology of fungal interactions with terrestrial orchids. Most of our understanding of the symbiotic associations of terrestrial orchids colonizing temperate forest ecosystems is from the northern hemisphere [17,18,19]. These studies have demonstrated the direct influence of the forest on the soil microbial communities and the preferences for specific mycorrhizal fungi [20,21,22]. Considerably less is known about terrestrial orchids, particularly those inhabiting the native temperate rainforest such as the Coastal Cordillera without volcanic influence and in the piedmont of Andes Cordillera with recent volcanic ash-derived soils in south-central Chile.
In the Andes Cordillera, many orchids are present, including epiphytic and terrestrial species [23,24]. In Chile, there are almost seventy species [25,26], which grow in grasslands or hilly sides in the native forest of the Andes and Coastal Cordillera and depend on specific OMF to germinate [3,27]. Such germination is complex given the particular requirements for mycorrhizal fungi, linked to enhanced climate change consequences and challenging climate conditions in summer (water shortage, high soil-surface temperature, and UV radiation) and winter (cold temperatures) [28,29,30], especially in the Andes Cordillera. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that, although OMF can be isolated from mycorrhizal tissues, they have low efficacy in in vitro symbiotic germination tests, especially in orchids colonizing some sites in the Andes [3]. In orchids growing in near the Coast, germination seems to be more efficient, obtaining high germination rates in symbiotic germination tests [3]. Therefore, it is expected that different fungal taxa (probably non-culturable) are involved in this stage, and rhizospheric fungi with plant growth-promoting traits may also have key roles at early developmental stages.
The seeds of native terrestrial Andean orchids are minute (<1 mm), with thousands produced by each plant [3]. Such seeds must find compatible mycorrhizal fungi in the soil to provide the embryo with carbon and other nutrients to start the germination stage and activate the critical symbiosis for orchids throughout their lives [31]. Once such a symbiosis occurs, the metabolic interchange mainly benefits the orchid, despite recently being reported as a potential nitrogen source for the fungal partner [32]. Despite the successful isolation of OMF from the roots of native species and the verified ability of some isolates for seed germination [33,34], the distribution and presence of OMF and other beneficial root-associated microorganisms in the orchid rhizosphere are mainly unknown [35]. In some sites of the Andes and Coastal Cordillera, associated with native and exotic forests, large populations of orchids live sympatrically or allopatrically [3]. The symbiotic requirements that successfully promote seed germination and plantlet establishment are expected to occur in such populations. Such sites represent an opportunity to study and understand terrestrial orchids’ life cycle and ecology.
Recently, soil DNA metabarcoding has been applied to understand several ecological processes involving plants and microorganisms, including orchids’ fungal and bacterial associations [36,37,38]. Therefore, knowing the diversity of fungi in the rhizosphere of terrestrial orchids in sites with a high concentration may help unravel fundamental symbiosis for the conservation of endangered orchid populations. This study aimed to analyze the diversity of fungal communities inhabiting the rhizosphere of the terrestrial orchids Gavilea lutea (Pers.) M.N. Correa and Chloraea collicensis Kraenzl. growing in temperate forests in south-central Chile, as a way to initiate further studies on potential mycorrhizal and beneficial fungal partners in other sites. Here, two high-orchid-population sites were selected in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera at similar latitudes. As far as we know, this is the first study analyzing the diversity of fungal communities associated with the rhizosphere of temperate Andean orchids using a metabarcoding approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Site Description

The native terrestrial orchids were identified during the flowering season (December 2019) in two different sites with a high concentration of orchid individuals: (i) G. lutea that colonize a pristine forest’s understory on high-elevation slopes near Andes Cordillera (Table 1) and (ii) C. collicensis growing in a grassland site surrounded by exotic trees (Pinus radiata D. Don and Eucalyptus globulus Labill.) near a segment of the Nahuelbuta mountains in the Coastal Cordillera (Table 1). The soils in the Andes are classified as Andisol according to the USDA [39], with minor developments and intensely layered volcanic ash soils [40], and the soil from Coastal is from the Metrenco series, a member of the fine, mixed, mesic family of typic Paleudults (Ultisol) [41].
About 3 g of rhizosphere soil samples were taken from 4 random plants for each subsite (n = 3) to perform the three composite rhizosphere soil samples at each site (Andes and Coastal Cordillera). The roots were gently shaken, and the rhizosphere soil adhering to the roots was collected. Similarly, composite bulk soil samples were collected 3 m away from each sampled plant at a depth of 10 cm, with no presence of other orchid individuals. The soil samples were stored in ice, transported to the laboratory, and stored at −20 °C for further processing. A total of 400 g of sieved 2 mm topsoil samples (0–10 cm deep) was reserved for standard chemical analysis. Chemical characterization was conducted for soil pH (2.5:1 water: soil ratio) and soil organic matter by the Walkley and Black method [42]. Other soil properties such as cation exchange capacity, Al, Fe, N, P, and K available were obtained [43].

2.2. DNA Isolation and Processing

Total DNA from rhizosphere and bulk samples was extracted from 300 mg of soil using the Soil DNA Extraction Kit (Metagenom Bio Inc, Waterloo, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and the DNA concentration was checked in a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The DNA samples were sequenced at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea), following the conditions reported in Fuentes, et al. [44], with modifications. The amplicon libraries were prepared according to the Illumina PCR Quantification Protocol Guide. The ITS2 region was amplified using the primer set ITS2_3F (5′ GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC 3′) and ITS2_4R (5′ TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC 3′) [44,45]. The size of PCR-enriched fragments was visualized on an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer using a DNA 1000 chip. The libraries were sequenced using a 2 × 300-bp paired-end run [MiSeq Reagent Kit, v. 3 (MS-102-3001)] on a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) instrument according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The raw data obtained in this study were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (http://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/) accessed on 9 September 2021, under accession number PRJNA761864.

2.3. Sequence Analyses

The quality of the resulting raw reads was checked using FastQC v0.11.5 and analyzed using QIIME2 v2019.10. A quality filter step was performed using the DADA2 algorithm, wherein the barcodes were removed, and reads were truncated at 280 and 250 for forward and reverse, respectively. Paired-end reads were joined, and then a quality-aware correcting model that denoises and remove chimeras and residual PhiX reads was applied. Reads were dereplicated, and amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were estimated. The taxonomic assignment was performed using a naive Bayes classifier with UNITE database v7.2, and the samples were rarified at a depth of 97.700. Alpha diversity measurements for diversity and evenness were calculated using Shannon’s diversity index and Pielou’s evenness, respectively, with QUIIME2, and the resulting values were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The trends of fungal sequences were visualized by a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and hierarchical clustering was constructed based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Statistical differences between treatments were estimated by a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), with 999 random permutations on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Differences between microbial communities associated with the orchid rhizosphere were explored by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) using a Kruskal–Wallis followed by a Wilcoxon rank-sum test for pairwise comparison, with a p-value of 0.05 as cut-off and a linear discriminant analysis score of 3.0. Additionally, the Indicspecies package was used to analyze the strength and statistical significance of the results. Similarly, the samples’ shared and unique fungal sequences were calculated and visualized using the MicEco package with Venn diagrams. The predicted ecological roles of the fungal OTUs were assigned using FUNGuild v1.1 [46] in Python v3.8.2. Statistical analysis and data visualization were performed in R software v3.6.3 (R Core Team 2018; https://www.R-project.org; accessed on 1 December 2021).

2.4. Isolation of Peloton-Associated Mycorrhizal Fungi

Compatible mycorrhizal fungi were isolated from the mycorrhizal tissues of the selected plants (Section 2.1), characterized and identified following standard procedures [47]. Briefly, the roots of the selected orchids (n = 12 per sampling point) were screened for the presence of mycorrhizal structures. A segment of the colonized roots (brownish tissues) was excised using a sterile scalpel. The selected tissues (n = 10 per plant) were superficially sterilized using a 1:1:8 (ethanol 95%, sodium hypochlorite (2.5% active chlorine), and sterile deionized water) solution. Afterward, the segments were rinsed ten times with deionized sterilized water in a laminar flow cabinet. Then, the pelotons were excised from the roots and placed in a Petri dish containing potato dextrose agar supplemented with streptomycin at 100 mM. The Petri dishes were incubated in darkness at room temperature until the growth of fungi from a peloton was detected. The mycorrhizal fungi that showed the phenotypic characteristic of OMF were selected for molecular identification following standard procedures [48].

2.5. Symbiotic Germination Tests

Symbiotic seed-germination tests were performed using the OMF isolated from pelotons to evaluate the capability of the strains to induce seed germination in vitro. A standard protocol was performed to promote the germination of orchid seeds [47]. The seeds from one mature capsule from G. lutea and C. collicensis were superficially disinfected in ethanol 20% for one min and sodium hypochlorite 10% for two min, then five washes in sterile deionized water. Then, the seeds were suspended in 30 mL of sterile deionized water. Then, 300 µL of the suspension was dispersed in Petri dishes containing 25 mL of oatmeal agar (OMA plus streptomycin 100 mM). A fungal plug (ø 5 mm) from the mycorrhizal fungi isolated from the respective orchid (G. lutea or C. collicensis) was placed in the center of the plate containing OMA and incubated for two months in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C. The effect of fungi on seed germination after 60 days was evaluated [49], and the germination index was calculated [47]. Symbiotic seed germination was considered positive when the tested fungi induced the embryo swelling (partially covered or enlarged embryo without testa). Quantitative data were analyzed by ANOVA. If the p-value indicated significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05), post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using the SD of means and Tukey’s multiple range test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 using R software (R Core Team 2018; https://www.R-project.org; accessed on 1 December 2021).

3. Results

3.1. Soil Characteristics

The soil chemical analyses showed differences between the Andes and the Coastal Cordillera soil. Specifically, total nitrogen, phosphorus, soil organic matter, aluminum saturation, iron, and extractable aluminum were higher in the Andes than in soils from the Coastal site (Table 2). Only total potassium, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation values were more elevated in soils from the Coastal site (Table 2).

3.2. Sequence Analysis

The sequence analysis showed 1,602,893 raw reads in the 12 input libraries, which were reduced to 1,354,116 ASV after quality filtering, which ranged from 97,765 to 125,611 and was, on average, 112,843 (Table S1).
Shannon’s and Pielou’s evenness diversity indices were similar among the four analyzed samples, with higher values in bulk soil from orchids growing in the Coastal site (Figure S1). The taxonomic assignment showed that the fungal communities differed between sampling sites. The phyla Basidiomycota and Ascomycota were the most abundant in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera soil, respectively (Figure 1A; Table S2). Specifically, the genera Cortinarius, Inocybe, and Mortierella were among the most-abundant fungal taxa in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil of G. lutea plants growing in the Andes (Figure 1B; Table S3). In contrast, the rhizosphere and bulk soil of C. collicensis growing in the grassland site near the Coastal Cordillera showed differences among the identified genera. Penicillium, Lechumicola, and Talaromyces were the most-abundant assigned taxa in the bulk soil, whereas Talaromyces, Penicillium, and Purpureocillium were among the most-abundant fungal taxa in the rhizosphere (Figure 1B; Table S3).
The Venn diagrams showed 168 core sequences in the four samples, and samples from the Andes bulk soil, Andes rhizosphere, Coastal rhizosphere, and Coastal bulk soils have 120, 240, 120, and 720 unique sequences, respectively (Figure 1C). Similarly, the hierarchical clustering analysis showed that rhizosphere and bulk soil samples from the Andes were similar. By contrast, clear differences were detected between bulk soil and rhizosphere samples from the Coastal site (Figure 1D).
The LefSe analyses showed that there were 65 distinct fungal taxa at the genus level, with 42 differential taxa being associated with the rhizosphere of orchids from the Coastal site (mainly related to the phyla Ascomycota, Chytridiomycota, and Monoblepharomycota) and 23 fungal taxa associated with the rhizosphere of orchids from the Andes (mainly related to the phyla Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Kickxellomycota, and Rosellomycota) (Figures S2 and S3).
Regarding identifying fungal sequences assigned to previously reported OMF, we detected significant differences in the abundance of fungal ASVs in the rhizosphere of the analyzed plants. Specifically, Tomentella, Sebacina, and Inocybe were exclusively associated with G. lutea plants, showing a relative abundance of 0.05%, 2.64%, and 15.44%, respectively (Figure 2; Table S4). Similarly, Thanatephorus and Fusarium were identified in the rhizosphere of C. collicensis growing in the Coastal site, with a relative abundance of 0.06% and 0.13%, respectively (Figure 2; Table S4). Only Mycena was detected at both sampling sites, showing a relative abundance of 0.13% and 0.03% in the Coastal and Andes sites, respectively (Figure 2; Table S4).
The FUNGuild analysis showed that the categories symbiotroph and saprotroph_symbiotroph were most represented in soils from the Andes. By contrast, pathotroph, saprotroph, and pathotroph_saprotroph were the most represented categories in soils from the Coastal site (Figure S4).
A total of three strains with the phenotypic traits of OMF were isolated, two from G. lutea and one from C. collicencis (Genbank accession number (ON190562-ON190564). The isolation frequency of the OMF was higher in the isolate CCC2 (0.53), followed by GLM3 (0.42) and GLM5 (0.05). The molecular identification of culturable OMF showed Ceratobasidum spp. (isolates CCC2 and GLM3 from C. collicencis and G. lutea, respectively) as the primary mycorrhizal fungi isolated from both analyzed orchids, whereas Tulasnella sp. was scarcely isolated (isolate GLM5 from G. lutea) (Table 3). Symbiotic germination tests showed that the isolates have a contrasting capability to induce seed germination, showing a germination index of 0.75 ± 0.14, 0.58 ± 0.07, and 2.02 ± 0.54 for the isolates GLM3, GLM5, and CCC2, respectively (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study used a metabarcoding approach to explore the diversity of mycorrhizal fungi associated with two native terrestrial orchids growing in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in south-central Chile. Our data show differences in the composition and abundance of mycorrhizal taxa associated with terrestrial orchids growing in threatened temperate ecosystems in south-central Chile.
Soil-inhabiting fungi have been described as essential partners in the initial developmental stages of orchids and crucial in promoting seed germination and further establishment [50]. In this study, we have identified different fungal taxa associated with the orchid rhizosphere, including widely distributed soil-beneficial fungi such as Cladosporium spp., Purpureocillium spp., and Mortierella spp. These fungal taxa have been described as plant-growth-promoting fungi that contribute to the plant establishment in several ecosystems [51,52,53]. However, the roles of such fungi in terrestrial orchids have scarcely been explored. Recent studies analyzing the fungal communities associated with orchids have discovered beneficial fungi such as Trechispora and Mortierella inhabiting the rhizosphere of Phalaenopsis sp. [54]. Additionally, Cortinarius was the dominant taxon identified in the rhizosphere of G. lutea in the Andes (Figure 1B). The fungal genera Cortinarius include ectomycorrhizal fungi specialized in carbon mobilization through mycelial networks [55]. Correspondingly, the ectomycorrhizal genera Cenococcum was also detected in the rhizosphere of G. lutea. This is a persistent ectomycorrhizal fungus in dry forest soils and can remain active despite low water availability in the soil [56,57], such as in summer, the season in which the orchids were sampled. However, the possible specialization of orchids to this mycorrhizal fungus for carbon needs to be further studied. Beneficial rhizosphere-inhabiting fungi are critical to supporting the plant growth in severe ecosystems such as the Andes [58], where abiotic stress factors such as nutrient scarcity, extreme weather conditions (i.e., relatively dry summers), and the biochemical characteristics of the soil (i.e., presence of metals such as aluminum) can interfere with the growth of orchids in native ecosystems [3,59]. Thus, a set of beneficial fungi can contribute to the development of orchids through multiple mechanisms such as the promotion of abiotic stress tolerance, the production of plant growth regulators, the biocontrol of phytopathogens, the improvement of nutritional status, and others [60,61,62]. Therefore, studying rhizosphere-inhabiting fungi can provide insights into beneficial taxa contributing to the further developmental stages of terrestrial Andean orchids.
Our study results suggest a selection of root-associated fungal communities in C. collicensis, wherein a specific microbiome can be identified in the rhizosphere soil, contrary to the results of G. lutea in the Andes Cordillera (Figure 1B,D and Figure 2). These differences are related to the ecosystem characteristics, such as the presence of native or exotic species, chemical properties of the soil, and organic matter input, which underline specific changes in the microbiological communities but can also select particular taxa that can contribute to the life cycle of the associated plant [38,63,64]. This specialization was also detected in OMF independent of the sampling site, showing contrasting communities (Figure 2). Therefore, the dynamic of root-associated fungal communities in the analyzed population seems to depend on the surrounding environment and can have a critical role in the adaptation and fitness of terrestrial orchids in the ecosystem [65,66]. This issue must be considered when designing strategies for safeguarding endangered orchid populations.
Commonly, mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids colonizing the southern Andes have been identified using culture-dependent methods [8], which provide essential information about orchid ecology and can help perform symbiotic germination tests under laboratory conditions. However, these assays are impossible when the orchid depends on mycorrhizal fungi that cannot be cultured using standard laboratory methods. This study demonstrated that the OMF isolated from pelotons differs from the main mycorrhizal taxa inhabiting the rhizosphere (Figure 2; Table 3). Previous studies have shown that some fungal strains directly isolated from pelotons could not induce seed germination and further progress to the plantlet stage under laboratory conditions [3]. Using the metabarcoding approach, we identify that the primary mycorrhizal fungus associated with the G. lutea rhizosphere belongs to Sebacinales, which have never been identified in any of the previous studies conducted in native terrestrial orchids colonizing temperate forest understory from Chile [3,27] but have been commonly reported in association with terrestrial orchids such as Epidendrum sp. growing in the Andes of southern Ecuador and in terrestrial Mediterranean orchids from the coast from Chile [38,67].
Although potential mycorrhizal strains were isolated from G. lutea roots (isolates GLM03 and GLM05), the ability to induce seed germination and advance to further stages was limited (compared to C. collicensis; Table 3). Different interactions with mycorrhizal fungi at the seed germination and plantlet stages can explain this low capability of advancing to further stages of seed germination. This agrees with Wang et al. [52], who showed that several orchids that transit from an initial mycoheterotrophic to a partially or fully autotrophic stage (which is present in terrestrial Andean orchids) often denotes a change in the fungal symbiont. Therefore, this change may explain the low efficiency of OMF isolated from pelotons to promote seed germination and further plantlet growth under laboratory conditions [9]. On the other hand, C. collicensis showed Thanatephorus spp. to be the main mycorrhizal taxa detected in the rhizosphere. Such OMF has previously been isolated from terrestrial orchids, but their ability to induce seed germination remains unclear [68]. In this study, the metabarcoding analysis did not detect Ceratobasidium sp., the most effective OMF for seed germination, colonizing the rhizosphere of the analyzed orchids. However, we identified Ceratobasidium sp. in the mycorrhizal tissues of C. collicensis (Table 3). Sequences designated as Thanatephorus and Ceratobasidium were usually clustered in one clade and may represent congeneric taxa in Ceratobasidiaceae in previous studies [69,70]. In this study, we found ITS2 ASVs assigned to Thanatephorus and the peloton-associated fungi (isolate CCC2) assigned to Ceratobasidium, which probably underline the fungal differences from mycorrhizal structures and rhizosphere of C. collicensis. However, this can also be related to the specificity of the selected PCR primers, and, therefore, different sequences/assignments can be obtained. Hence, further phylogenetic studies are necessary to ascertain the differences among fungi.
In the rhizosphere, compatible OMF is active [36,71], contributing to the population dynamic of orchids inhabiting an ecosystem. In this study, the metabarcoding approach has revealed fungal taxa commonly associated with terrestrial orchids colonizing temperate forests in Europe and North America but not described as mycorrhizae in native orchids from the southern Andes. This is related to the limited number of studies analyzing the fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of terrestrial orchids in temperate forests from the Andes. Additionally, most studies exploring the distribution of OMF in Andean orchids usually focus on identifying the traditionally accepted mycorrhizae, and culture-dependent methods might reduce the possibility of detecting novel taxa [3,38,72]. Fungal species from the genera Mycena, Inocybe, and Tomentella have been commonly reported with a critical role in the seed germination stage and seedling growth of orchids with different trophic modes. For instance, the litter-decaying fungi Mycena has been described in association with the mycoheterotrophic orchid Gastrodia confusa in temperate regions in Asia [22]. Similarly, the mycoheterotrophic orchid Epipogium aphyllum exclusively interacts with the ectomycorrhiza-forming genera Inocybe in the temperate areas of the Eurasian region [73]. The partially mycoheterotrophic orchid Oreorchis indica can also form mycorrhiza with the obligate ectomycorrhizal fungus Tomentella colonizing a sub-boreal forest understory [74]. On the other hand, in Australia, orchid species have been found to associate with typical orchid mycorrhizal fungi such as Sebacina, Tulasnella, and Ceratobasidium [75,76,77,78]. Overall, these studies demonstrate that terrestrial orchids inhabiting the forest understory are dynamic and can establish symbiosis with common soil-inhabiting taxa from which the obtained carbon is essential to complement the lack/inefficiency of photosynthesis in the shadow environment.
Some OMF active in the orchid’s rhizosphere are challenging to isolate and identify using culture-dependent methodologies, but a potential role in early growth stages can be expected. Thus, multiple detection methods may complement our understanding of the population dynamic of threatened orchid populations. Indeed, this study has revealed the presence of the genus Fusarium in the rhizosphere of C. collicensis growing in the Coastal site, which has been listed as a novel OMF promoting the seed germination of the autotrophic epiphytic orchid Bletilla striata and also inhabiting the mycorrhizal roots of the Mediterranean Chilean orchid Bipinnula fimbriata [14,38]. Therefore, limiting the study of mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids to culture-dependent methods may shorten the understanding of OMF active in the orchid rhizosphere, restricting the establishment of plantlets derived from symbiotic germination tests. The environmental conditions and soil substrate’s particular characteristics have directly affected the composition of compatible mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids and their germination success [27,79]. Therefore, multiple factors must be considered for the successful germination of orchids from Andean ecosystems.
The high specificity of symbiotic fungi may limit the success of reintroduction programs based on symbiotic or asymbiotic germination. Therefore, more than focusing on single strains, rhizosphere-associated community management strategies can be more effective at preserving threatened orchid populations, especially when the focus is on orchids that can interact with non-culturable mycorrhizal fungi. Hence, approaches involving compatible OMF and beneficial root-associated taxa must be implemented to manage endangered orchid populations better.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that the terrestrial orchids G. lutea and C. collicensis colonizing temperate forest soils in south-central Chile interact with different rhizosphere-associated and mycorrhizal fungal communities depending on the growing ecosystems. Similarly, the orchid mycorrhizal fungi associated with pelotons differed from mycorrhizal taxa inhabiting the rhizosphere in G. lutea from the Andes Cordillera. Further studies must address the capability of the native fungal microbiome associated with large-orchid-population-density areas to support the seed germination and plantlet establishment and determine if the selection of mycorrhizal fungi is a common characteristic of terrestrial Andean orchids from temperate forests.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8080794/s1, Figure S1: Alpha diversity measurement distribution of the fungal microbiome associated with bulk and rhizosphere soil samples of native terrestrial orchids growing in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in southern Chile. Shannon diversity index (A) and Pielou’s evenness (B). Samples AB = Andes bulk soil, AR = Andes rhizospheric soil, CB = Coastal bulk soil, and CR = Coastal rhizospheric soil. Figure S2: Linear discriminate analysis (LDA) of effect size (LEfSe) to identify the preferential taxa at the phylum level in rhizosphere soil associated with terrestrial orchids from the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in Southern Chile. Only taxa with an LDA score > 3.0 are shown. Figure S3: Linear discriminate analysis of effect size to identify preferential taxa at the genus level in the rhizosphere of the orchid from both analyzed sites. Only taxa with an LDA score > 3.0 are shown. Figure S4. Relative abundance of ITS sequences representing different trophic modes of fungi in the rhizosphere of orchids growing in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in the region of La Araucanía, south-central Chile. Table S1: Trimming summary showing the number of initial reads, reads that pass quality control, number of sequences after merging them by their 3’ ends, and resulting non-chimeric ASV in soil samples associated with terrestrial-orchid hotspots in the southern Andes. Table S2: Mean relative abundance of the ten most-abundant fungal phylum identified in soil samples associated with terrestrial orchid-hotspots in the south Andes. Table S3: Mean relative abundance of the eighteen most-abundant fungal genera identified in soil samples associated with terrestrial-orchid hotspots in the southern Andes. Table S4: Relative abundance (%) of the commonly reported orchid mycorrhizal fungi inhabiting the rhizosphere and bulk soil samples of terrestrial orchids growing in the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in south-central Chile. Dataset S1: Taxonomy assignment of fungal ASVs in rhizosphere soil associated with terrestrial orchids from the Andes and Coastal Cordillera in southern Chile.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H. and T.S.; methodology, H.H., R.B.d.S.V. and T.S.; validation, H.H. and C.A. (Cesar Arriagada); formal analysis, H.H., C.A. (Cesar Arriagada) and R.B.d.S.V.; investigation, H.H.; data curation, H.H., R.B.d.S.V. and C.A. (Cesar Arriagada); writing—original draft preparation, H.H.; writing—review and editing, H.H., T.S., R.B.d.S.V., C.A. (Cristian Atala), G.P., F.M., M.d.l.L.M. and C.A. (Cesar Arriagada); funding acquisition, H.H. and C.A. (Cesar Arriagada). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDECYT-POSTDOCTORADO 3200134 and FONDECYT-REGULAR 1211857.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data obtained in this study was submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (http://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/traces/sra/; accessed on 9 September 2021) under accession number PRJNA761864.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dearnaley, J.; Perotto, S.; Selosse, M.A. Structure and development of orchid mycorrhizas. Mol. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2016, 2016, 63–86. [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrera, H.; García-Romera, I.; Meneses, C.; Pereira, G.; Arriagada, C. Orchid Mycorrhizal Interactions on the Pacific Side of the Andes from Chile. A Review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuga, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Yurimoto, H. Stable isotope cellular imaging reveals that both live and degenerating fungal pelotons transfer carbon and nitrogen to orchid protocorms. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pereira, G.; Herrera, H.; Arriagada, C.; Cid, H.; García, J.L.; Atala, C. Controlled mycorrhization of the endemic Chilean orchid Chloraea gavilu (Orchidaceae). Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2021, 155, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Merckx, V.S. Mycoheterotrophy: An introduction. In Mycoheterotrophy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sakamoto, Y.; Ogura-Tsujita, Y.; Ito, K.; Suetsugu, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yamazaki, J.; Yukawa, T.; Maki, M. The tiny-leaved orchid Cephalanthera subaphylla obtains most of its carbon via mycoheterotrophy. J. Plant Res. 2016, 129, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pereira, G.; Romero, C.; Suz, L.M.; Atala, C. Essential mycorrhizal partners of the endemic Chilean orchids Chloraea collicensis and C. gavilu. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2014, 209, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, Y.-Y.; Zhang, W.-L.; Selosse, M.-A.; Gao, J.-Y. Are fungi from adult orchid roots the best symbionts at germination? A case study. Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sisti, L.S.; Flores-Borges, D.N.A.; Andrade, S.A.L.D.; Koehler, S.; Bonatelli, M.L.; Mayer, J.L.S. The role of non-mycorrhizal fungi in germination of the mycoheterotrophic orchid Pogoniopsis schenckii Cogn. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, G.; Roa, N.; Castillo-Novales, D.; Arriagada, C.; Herrera, H.; Molina-Montenegro, M.; Atala, C. Mycorrhizal fungi isolated from Chilean orchids as biocontrollers of the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Gayana Bot. 2021, 78, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ogura-Tsujita, Y.; Yokoyama, J.; Miyoshi, K.; Yukawa, T. Shifts in mycorrhizal fungi during the evolution of autotrophy to mycoheterotrophy in Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 1158–1176. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yuan, Z.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Yang, Y. Diverse non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes inhabiting an epiphytic, medicinal orchid (Dendrobium nobile): Estimation and characterization. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, J.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, S.; Nie, Q.; Zhou, S.-X.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhen, X.; Li, X.; Zhen, T.; et al. Fusarium oxysporum KB-3 from Bletilla striata: An orchid mycorrhizal fungus. Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McCormick, M.K.; Whigham, D.F.; Sloan, D.; O’Malley, K.; Hodkinson, B. Orchid–fungus fidelity: A marriage meant to last? Ecology 2006, 87, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rasmussen, H.N.; Rasmussen, F.N. Orchid mycorrhiza: Implications of a mycophagous life style. Oikos 2009, 118, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kull, T. Population dynamics of north temperate orchids. Orchid Biol. Rev. Perspect. 2002, 8, 139–165. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wraith, J.; Pickering, C. A continental scale analysis of threats to orchids. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 234, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
  19. Diantina, S.; Kartikaningrum, S.; McCormick, A.C.; Millner, J.; McGill, C.; Pritchard, H.W.; Nadarajan, J. Comparative in vitro seed germination and seedling development in tropical and temperate epiphytic and temperate terrestrial orchids. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 143, 619–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dearnaley, J.D.; Martos, F.; Selosse, M.-A. 12 Orchid mycorrhizas: Molecular ecology, physiology, evolution and conservation aspects. In Fungal Associations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 207–230. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, T.; Yang, W.; Wu, S.; Selosse, M.-A.; Gao, J. Progress and prospects of mycorrhizal fungal diversity in orchids. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 646325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ogura-Tsujita, Y.; Tetsuka, K.; Tagane, S.; Kubota, M.; Anan, S.; Yamashita, Y.; Tone, K.; Yukawa, T. Differing life-history strategies of two mycoheterotrophic orchid species associated with leaf litter-and wood-decaying fungi. Diversity 2021, 13, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pérez-Escobar, O.A.; Chomicki, G.; Condamine, F.L.; Karremans, A.P.; Bogarín, D.; Matzke, N.J.; Silvestro, D.; Antonelli, A. Recent origin and rapid speciation of Neotropical orchids in the world’s richest plant biodiversity hotspot. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cartay, A. Ecotourism in the earthly paradise of South America: Orchids, butterflies and hummingbirds in this mega biodiversity zone. Tur. Soc. 2020, 27, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  25. Novoa, P.; Espejo, J.; Cisternas, M.; Rubio, M.; Dominguez, E. Guía De Campo De Las Orquídeas Chilenas; Corporación Chilena De La Madera (Corma): Concepción, Chile, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodriguez, R.; Marticorena, C.; Alarcón, D.; Baeza, C.; Cavieres, L.; Finot, V.L.; Fuentes, N.; Kiessling, A.; Mihoc, M.; Pauchard, A. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Chile. Gayana Bot. 2018, 75, 1–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mujica, M.I.; Cisternas, M.; Claro, A.; Simunovic, M.; Pérez, F. Nutrients and fungal identity affect the outcome of symbiotic germination in Bipinnula fimbriata (Orchidaceae). Symbiosis 2021, 83, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mora, M.; Alfaro, M.; Jarvis, S.; Demanet, R.; Cartes, P.J.S.U. Soil aluminium availability in Andisols of southern Chile and its effect on forage production and animal metabolism. Soil Use Manag. 2006, 22, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aguayo, R.; León-Muñoz, J.; Garreaud, R.; Montecinos, A. Hydrological droughts in the southern Andes (40–45° S) from an ensemble experiment using CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Masiokas, M.H.; Villalba, R.; Christie, D.; Betman, E.; Luckman, B.; Le Quesne, C.; Prieto, M.R.; Mauget, S. Snowpack variations since AD 1150 in the Andes of Chile and Argentina (30°–37°S) inferred from rainfall, tree-ring and documentary records. J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117, D05112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Valadares, R.; Perotto, S.; Lucheta, A.R.; Santos, E.C.; Oliveira, R.M.; Lambais, M.R. Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Indicate Metabolic Changes and Reduced Defense Responses in Mycorrhizal Roots of Oeceoclades maculata (Orchidaceae) Collected in Nature. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fochi, V.; Chitarra, W.; Kohler, A.; Voyron, S.; Singan, V.R.; Lindquist, E.A.; Barry, K.W.; Girlanda, M.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Martin, F. Fungal and plant gene expression in the Tulasnella calospora–Serapias vomeracea symbiosis provides clues about nitrogen pathways in orchid mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Herrera, H.; Sanhueza, T.; Martiarena, R.; Valadares, R.; Fuentes, A.; Arriagada, C. Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pereira, G.; Suz, L.M.; Albornoz, V.; Romero, C.; García, L.; Leiva, V.; Atala, C. Mycorrhizal fungi associated with Codonorchis lessonii (Brongn.) Lindl., a terrestrial orchid from Chile. Gayana Bot. 2018, 75, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Herrera, H.; Sanhueza, T.; Novotná, A.; Charles, T.C.; Arriagada, C. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from mycorrhizal tissues of terrestrial orchids from southern Chile. Diversity 2020, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Egidi, E.; May, T.W.; Franks, A.E. Seeking the needle in the haystack: Undetectability of mycorrhizal fungi outside of the plant rhizosphere associated with an endangered Australian orchid. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 33, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, O.; Xiao, R.; Sun, L.; Guan, C.; Kong, D.; Hu, X. Bacterial and diazotrophic diversities of endophytes in Dendrobium catenatum determined through barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Mujica, M.I.; Pérez, M.F.; Jakalski, M.; Martos, F.; Selosse, M.A. Soil P reduces mycorrhizal colonization while favors fungal pathogens: Observational and experimental evidence in Bipinnula (Orchidaceae). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Burt, R. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual; Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51, Version 2; US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Lincoln, NE, USA, 2014.
  40. Blume, T.; Zehe, E.; Bronstert, A. Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes II: Qualitative and quantitative use of tracers at three spatial scales. Hydrol. Processes 2008, 22, 3676–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. CIREN. Descripciones De Suelos Materiales y Símbolos: Estudio Agrológico IX Región; Publicación CIREN: Santiago, Chile, 2002; p. 122.
  42. Matus, F.J.; Escudey, M.; Förster, J.E.; Gutiérrez, M.; Chang, A.C. Is the Walkley–Black method suitable for organic carbon determination in chilean volcanic soils? Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2009, 40, 1862–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Herrera, H.; Palma, G.; Almonacid, L.; Campos, R.; Fuentes, A.; Garcia-Romera, I.; Arriagada, C. Improving Soil Simazine Dissipation Through an Organic Amendment Inoculated with Trametes versicolor. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fuentes, A.; Herrera, H.; Charles, T.C.; Arriagada, C. Fungal and Bacterial Microbiome Associated with the Rhizosphere of Native Plants from the Atacama Desert. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nguyen, N.H.; Song, Z.; Bates, S.T.; Branco, S.; Tedersoo, L.; Menke, J.; Schilling, J.S.; Kennedy, P.G. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Valadares, R.B.; Pereira, M.C.; Otero, J.T.; Cardoso, E.J. Narrow fungal mycorrhizal diversity in a population of the orchid Coppensia doniana. Biotropica 2012, 44, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Herrera, H.; Fuentes, A.; Ortiz, J.; Soto, J.; da Silva Valadares, R.B.; Salas-Eljatib, C.; Arriagada, C. Root-associated endophytes isolated from juvenile Ulex europaeus L. (Fabaceae) plants colonizing rural areas in South-Central Chile. Plant Soil 2022, 474, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vasudevan, R.; van Staden, J. Fruit harvesting time and corresponding morphological changes of seed integuments influence in vitro seed germination of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 60, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Calevo, J.; Voyron, S.; Adamo, M.; Alibrandi, P.; Perotto, S.; Girlanda, M. Can orchid mycorrhizal fungi be persistently harbored by the plant host? Fungal Ecol. 2021, 53, 101071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Z.T.; Janisiewicz, W.J.; Liu, Z.; Callahan, A.M.; Evans, B.E.; Jurick, W.M.; Dardick, C. Exposure in vitro to an environmentally isolated strain TC09 of Cladosporium sphaerospermum triggers plant growth promotion, early flowering, and fruit yield increase. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Baron, N.C.; de Souza Pollo, A.; Rigobelo, E.C. Purpureocillium lilacinum and Metarhizium marquandii as plant growth-promoting fungi. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ozimek, E.; Hanaka, A. Mortierella species as the plant growth-promoting fungi present in the agricultural soils. Agriculture 2021, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, C.-L.; Jian, F.-Y.; Huang, H.-J.; Chang, W.-C.; Wu, W.-L.; Hwang, C.-C.; Lee, R.-H.; Chiang, T.-Y. Deciphering mycorrhizal fungi in cultivated Phalaenopsis microbiome with next-generation sequencing of multiple barcodes. Fungal Divers. 2014, 66, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Deslippe, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Grayston, S.J.; Simard, S.W.; Mohn, W.W. Stable isotope probing implicates a species of Cortinarius in carbon transfer through ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelial networks in Arctic tundra. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Nyamsanjaa, K.; Oyuntsetseg, B.; Takashima, Y.; Sakagami, N.; Watanabe, M. Characteristics of Cenococcum geophilum sclerotia found in steppe forest soil in Mongolia. J. For. Res. 2022, 27, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taniguchi, T.; Kitajima, K.; Douhan, G.W.; Yamanaka, N.; Allen, M.F. A pulse of summer precipitation after the dry season triggers changes in ectomycorrhizal formation, diversity, and community composition in a Mediterranean forest in California, USA. Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Costa, P.H.D.O.; Nascimento, S.V.D.; Herrera, H.; Gastauer, M.; Ramos, S.J.; Caldeira, C.F.; Oliveira, G.; Valadares, R.B.D.S. Non-Specific Interactions of Rhizospheric Microbial Communities Support the Establishment of Mimosa acutistipula var. ferrea in an Amazon Rehabilitating Mineland. Processes 2021, 9, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Böhmer, M.; Ozdín, D.; Račko, M.; Lichvár, M.; Budiš, J.; Szemes, T. Identification of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in the Roots of Orchids and Surrounding Soil in Heavy Metal Contaminated Area of Mining Heaps. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shi, Q.; Liu, Y.; Shi, A.; Cai, Z.; Nian, H.; Hartmann, M.; Lian, T. Rhizosphere soil fungal communities of aluminum-tolerant and-sensitive soybean genotypes respond differently to aluminum stress in an acid soil. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, Z.; Li, T.; Wen, X.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Liao, Y.; DeBruyn, J.M. Fungal communities in rhizosphere soil under conservation tillage shift in response to plant growth. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hossain, M.M.; Sultana, F.; Islam, S. Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF): Phytostimulation and induced systemic resistance. In Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 135–191. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wardle, D.A. Communities and ecosystems. In Communities and Ecosystems; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  64. Almonacid-Muñoz, L.; Herrera, H.; Fuentes-Ramírez, A.; Vargas-Gaete, R.; Larama, G.; Jara, R.; Fernández-Urrutia, C.; da Silva Valadares, R.B. Tree Cover Species Modify the Diversity of Rhizosphere-Associated Microorganisms in Nothofagus obliqua (Mirb.) Oerst Temperate Forests in South-Central Chile. Forests 2022, 13, 756. [Google Scholar]
  65. Li, T.; Wu, S.; Yang, W.; Selosse, M.-A.; Gao, J. How mycorrhizal associations influence orchid distribution and population dynamics. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 647114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Djordjević, V.; Tsiftsis, S. The role of ecological factors in distribution and abundance of terrestrial orchids. In Orchids Phytochemistry, Biology and Horticulture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 3–72. [Google Scholar]
  67. Duran-Lopez, M.; Caroca-Cáceres, R.; Jahreis, K.; Narváez-Vera, M.; Ansaloni, R.; Cazar, M. The micorryzal fungi Ceratobasidium sp. and Sebacina vermifera promote seed germination and seedling development of the terrestrial orchid Epidendrum secundum Jacq. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 125, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herrera, H.; Valadares, R.; Contreras, D.; Bashan, Y.; Arriagada, C. Mycorrhizal compatibility and symbiotic seed germination of orchids from the Coastal Range and Andes in south central Chile. Mycorrhiza 2017, 27, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gónzalez, D.; Rodriguez-Carres, M.; Boekhout, T.; Stalpers, J.; Kuramae, E.E.; Nakatani, A.K.; Vilgalys, R.; Cubeta, M.A. Phylogenetic relationships of Rhizoctonia fungi within the Cantharellales. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Moncalvo, J.-M.; Nilsson, R.H.; Koster, B.; Dunham, S.M.; Bernauer, T.; Matheny, P.B.; Porter, T.M.; Margaritescu, S.; Weiß, M.; Garnica, S. The cantharelloid clade: Dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Mycologia 2006, 98, 937–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Petrolli, R.; Vieira, C.A.; Jakalski, M.; Bocayuva, M.F.; Valle, C.; Cruz, E.D.S.; Selosse, M.A.; Martos, F.; Kasuya, M.C.M. A fine-scale spatial analysis of fungal communities on tropical tree bark unveils the epiphytic rhizosphere in orchids. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 2002–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. McCormick, M.K.; Taylor, D.L.; Whigham, D.F.; Burnett, R.K., Jr. Germination patterns in three terrestrial orchids relate to abundance of mycorrhizal fungi. J. Ecol. 2016, 104, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Roy, M.; Yagame, T.; Yamato, M.; Iwase, K.; Heinz, C.; Faccio, A.; Bonfante, P.; Selosse, M.-A. Ectomycorrhizal Inocybe species associate with the mycoheterotrophic orchid Epipogium aphyllum but not its asexual propagules. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Suetsugu, K.; Haraguchi, T.F.; Tanabe, A.S.; Tayasu, I. Specialized mycorrhizal association between a partially mycoheterotrophic orchid Oreorchis indica and a Tomentella taxon. Mycorrhiza 2021, 31, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Phillips, R.D.; Barrett, M.D.; Dalziell, E.L.; Dixon, K.W.; Swarts, N.D. Geographical range and host breadth of Sebacina orchid mycorrhizal fungi associating with Caladenia in south-western Australia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 182, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Freestone, M.W.; Swarts, N.D.; Reiter, N.; Tomlinson, S.; Sussmilch, F.C.; Wright, M.M.; Holmes, G.D.; Phillips, R.D.; Linde, C.C. Continental-scale distribution and diversity of Ceratobasidium orchid mycorrhizal fungi in Australia. Ann. Bot. 2021, 128, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Davis, B.J.; Phillips, R.D.; Wright, M.; Linde, C.C.; Dixon, K.W. Continent-wide distribution in mycorrhizal fungi: Implications for the biogeography of specialized orchids. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Linde, C.C.; May, T.W.; Phillips, R.D.; Ruibal, M.; Smith, L.M.; Peakall, R. New species of Tulasnella associated with terrestrial orchids in Australia. IMA Fungus 2017, 8, 28–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Mujica, M.I.; Saez, N.; Cisternas, M.; Manzano, M.; Armesto, J.J.; Pérez, F. Relationship between soil nutrients and mycorrhizal associations of two Bipinnula species (Orchidaceae) from central Chile. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jof 08 00794 g001 550
Figure 1. Fungal diversity associated with the rhizosphere of terrestrial orchids growing in the Andes (Gavilea lutea; AB: Andes bulk soil; AR Andes rhizosphere) and Coastal site (Chloraea collicensis; CB: Coastal bulk soil; CR: Coastal rhizosphere) in the region of La Araucanía, south-central Chile: (A) Relative abundance of ITS sequences at the phylum level, (B) relative abundance of ITS sequences at the genus level, (C) heatmap showing the specific and shared sequences between the sampling sites, (D) principal coordinate analysis of the fungal sequences from the analyzed sampling sites.
Figure 1. Fungal diversity associated with the rhizosphere of terrestrial orchids growing in the Andes (Gavilea lutea; AB: Andes bulk soil; AR Andes rhizosphere) and Coastal site (Chloraea collicensis; CB: Coastal bulk soil; CR: Coastal rhizosphere) in the region of La Araucanía, south-central Chile: (A) Relative abundance of ITS sequences at the phylum level, (B) relative abundance of ITS sequences at the genus level, (C) heatmap showing the specific and shared sequences between the sampling sites, (D) principal coordinate analysis of the fungal sequences from the analyzed sampling sites.
Jof 08 00794 g001
Jof 08 00794 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the ITS sequences of different orchid mycorrhizal taxa in the rhizosphere of orchids growing in the Andes (Gavilea lutea) and Coastal Cordillera (Chloraea collicensis) in the region of La Araucanía, south-central Chile.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the ITS sequences of different orchid mycorrhizal taxa in the rhizosphere of orchids growing in the Andes (Gavilea lutea) and Coastal Cordillera (Chloraea collicensis) in the region of La Araucanía, south-central Chile.
Jof 08 00794 g002
Table
Table 1. Location and general description of the sampling sites.
Table 1. Location and general description of the sampling sites.
SitesMalalcahuello
(Andes Cordillera Piedmont)		Cholchol
(Coastal Cordillera Piedmont)
Coordinates38°26′12″ S 71°33′01″ W38°35′27.6″ S 72°54′57.9″ W
Elevation1616 m.a.s.l.29 m.a.s.l.
Mean annual precipitation1225 mm (18.8 to 341 mm) a464 mm (1.9 to 118 mm) a
Mean annual temperature7.4 °C (3.5 to 16.5 °C) a12.7 °C (7 to 23 °C) a
Vegetation details/understoryNothofagus dombeyii, Araucaria araucana, Nothofagus antarctica, Alstroemeria spp.Pinus radiata, Eucalyptus globulus, Ulex europaeus, and a mixture of native grasses
Soil orderAndisolUltisol
ForestNative humid temperate rainforestExotic tree plantations surrounded by native grassland
a low and high monthly temperatures in the sampling sites.
Table
Table 2. Chemical characterization of soil associated with orchid hotspots in the Andes and Coastal site in south-central Chile. Results are means ± standard deviation.
Table 2. Chemical characterization of soil associated with orchid hotspots in the Andes and Coastal site in south-central Chile. Results are means ± standard deviation.
AndesCoastal
N a16.75 ± 0.9612.00 ± 1.41
P a29.00 ± 8.834.25 ± 0.50
K a81.13 ± 9.24109.48 ± 43.54
pH b5.53 ± 0.175.62 ± 0.15
SOM8.50 ± 0.584.25 ± 0.50
K d0.21 ± 0.020.28 ± 0.11
Na d0.04 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.01
Ca d2.11 ± 0.814.32 ± 0.48
Mg d0.45 ± 0.181.50 ± 0.19
Al d0.40 ± 0.180.52 ± 0.31
Al saturation c13.42 ± 7.397.95 ± 4.92
Cation exchange capacity d3.20 ± 0.956.71 ± 0.44
Base saturation d2.81 ± 1.016.19 ± 0.74
Fe a74.75 ± 13.8430.00 ± 5.10
Alextractable a722.75 ± 29.00264.50 ± 17.00
Soil textureSandy loamClay loam
a mg kg−1, b In H2O, c Soil organic matter (%), d C mol(+) kg−1 soil.
Table
Table 3. Peloton-associated mycorrhizal fungi isolated from a native temperate rainforest in south-central Chile and their effect on the seed germination of the source (Chloraea collicensis and Gavilea lutea).
Table 3. Peloton-associated mycorrhizal fungi isolated from a native temperate rainforest in south-central Chile and their effect on the seed germination of the source (Chloraea collicensis and Gavilea lutea).
IsolateClose Relative
(% Identity)		GenBank Accession
(Close Relative)		Isolation Source
(Close Relative)		Germination Index
CCC2Ceratobasidium sp. (99%)MK792996Chloraea gavilu2.02 ± 0.54
GLM3Ceratobasidiaceae sp. (99%)MK876128Bipinnula sp.0.75 ± 0.14
GLM5Tulasnella sp. (100%)MK793004Chloraea lechleri0.58 ± 0.07
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herrera, H.; Sanhueza, T.; da Silva Valadares, R.B.; Matus, F.; Pereira, G.; Atala, C.; Mora, M.d.l.L.; Arriagada, C. Diversity of Root-Associated Fungi of the Terrestrial Orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis in a Temperate Forest Soil of South-Central Chile. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080794

AMA Style

Herrera H, Sanhueza T, da Silva Valadares RB, Matus F, Pereira G, Atala C, Mora MdlL, Arriagada C. Diversity of Root-Associated Fungi of the Terrestrial Orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis in a Temperate Forest Soil of South-Central Chile. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(8):794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herrera, Héctor, Tedy Sanhueza, Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares, Francisco Matus, Guillermo Pereira, Cristian Atala, María de la Luz Mora, and Cesar Arriagada. 2022. "Diversity of Root-Associated Fungi of the Terrestrial Orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis in a Temperate Forest Soil of South-Central Chile" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 8: 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080794

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop