Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Antimycotic Activity of Originator and Generics of Voriconazole and Anidulafungin against Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata
Previous Article in Journal
Genome Mining and Analysis of PKS Genes in Eurotium cristatum E1 Isolated from Fuzhuan Brick Tea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/jof8020194
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Global Cutaneous Mucormycosis: A Systematic Review

by
Anna Skiada
1,*,
Maria Drogari-Apiranthitou
2,
Ioannis Pavleas
3,
Eirini Daikou
1 and
George Petrikkos
2,4
1
First Department of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
3
Intensive Care Unit, Laiko Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
4
School of Medicine, European University of Cyprus, Engomi 2404, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(2), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020194
Submission received: 26 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 15 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cutaneous mucormycosis is the third most common clinical type of mucormycosis. The signs and symptoms vary widely, and it is important to make the diagnosis as early as possible in order to achieve a better outcome. We present a systematic review of its epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment, analyzing cases published from 1958 until 2021. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and included 693 cases from 485 articles from 46 countries. Most publications were from North America (256 cases, 36.9%) and Asia (216 cases, 31.2%). The most common risk factors were diabetes mellitus (20%) and hematological malignancies (15.7%). However, a large proportion of published cases (275, 39.6%) had no identified underlying disease. The most common mode of transmission was trauma (54%), and 108 (15.6%) cases were healthcare-associated. In this review, 291 (42.5%) patients had localized infection, and 90 (13%) had disseminated mucormycosis. In Europe, N. America and S. America, the most common genus was Rhizopus spp., while in Asia it was Apophysomyces spp. (34.7%). Treatment was performed with antifungals, mainly amphotericin B, and/or surgery. Mortality was significantly lower when both antifungals and surgery were applied (29.6%).

1. Introduction

Mucormycosis is an emerging fungal infection, caused by fungi of the order Mucorales. Diabetes mellitus is the most common underlying disease globally [1,2]. Other risk factors include hematological and other malignancies, transplantation, prolonged neutropenia, corticosteroids, trauma, burns, iron overload, illicit intravenous drug use, or neonatal prematurity [3]. The increasing prevalence of diabetes, especially in low- and middle-income countries has resulted in the increased incidence of mucormycosis [4]. An increased incidence has also been reported in Western Europe and the USA, as new immunomodulating agents are used in the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases, and as more transplantations are performed [5]. Cutaneous mucormycosis is the third most common clinical type of this infection, after rhinocerebral and pulmonary [3]. Its epidemiology is evolving, as new diagnostic tools lead to the identification of previously uncommon species, such as Saksenaea erythrospora [6] and Apophysomyces mexicanus [7]. A large proportion of patients with cutaneous mucormycosis have no underlying disease, and their infection is a result of trauma. The signs and symptoms vary widely, and it is important to make the diagnosis as early as possible in order to achieve a better outcome. For this reason, we performed a systematic review of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of cutaneous mucormycosis, analyzing case reports and case series published from 1958 until 2021.

2. Methods

The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews [8].

2.1. Search Strategies and Eligibility Criteria

Cases were identified from PubMed, using the keywords “cutaneous”, “mucormycosis”, “zygomycosis”, “soft tissue”, “fasciitis”, “trauma”, “ulcer”, “Rhizopus”, “Mucor”, “Lichtheimia”, “Apophysomyces”, “Saksenaea”, “Syncephalastrum”, and “Cunninghamella”. The references of the relevant articles were also searched. Only articles published in English, and pertaining to humans, were included. The cases had to have documentation of: (i) age and sex of the patient, (ii) underlying diseases/predisposing factors, (iii) site(s) of infection, (iv) methods of diagnosis, (v) description of the applied treatment, and (vi) outcome. Twelve patients who left against medical advice were also included. Selected articles presented either primary or secondary/disseminated cutaneous mucormycosis. In the latter case, we included only those where the diagnosis of mucormycosis was initially made from the cutaneous lesion(s). Diagnoses had to be made by histopathology and/or the identification of the responsible fungus, either by culture, or by molecular methods.
The first case identified by this search strategy was published in 1958. The final search was published in July 2021.
Publications of case series with no description of individual patient data, review articles, conference abstracts, or editorials, and those with poorly described cases, were excluded.

2.2. Data Collection Process and Data Items

Collected data were inserted in an Excel database. Data were extracted independently by three authors (A.S., M.D.A., and E.D.), and any discrepancies were discussed with I.P. and G.P. The data items were age, sex, country of origin, year of publication, underlying disease/predisposing factors, mode of transmission, site of infection, clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis (including biopsy, autopsy, direct microscopy, cultures, and molecular methods), modes of treatment, and outcome (all-cause mortality). Clinical presentation was classified as localized, with deep extension, or disseminated, depending on the extent of the fungal invasion [3].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (version 11.5; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables are reported as percentages and continuous variables (except for years of publication) as median and range.

3. Results

As described in the PRISMA diagram (Figure 1), after screening the retrieved articles, 693 cases from 484 articles were included in the analysis. The oldest identified case was published in 1958. The number of cases per year are shown in Figure 2. The data included were from 46 countries. The geographic distribution of cases is shown in Figure 3. Most publications were from North America (256 cases, 36.9%) and Asia (216 cases, 31.2%). The rest were: 149 from Europe (21.5%), 29 from Central and South America (4.2%), 40 from Australia (5.8%), and 3 from Africa (0.4%). The list of articles analyzed is presented in the Supplementary Material (File S1).

3.1. Demographics

Of the 693 patients, 130 (19%) were younger than 18 years of age. Of these 130, 93 were older than one year (median age 11 years, range 1–17 years), 12 were between 1 and 12 months (median age 6 months, range 1.7–11 months), and 25 were neonates (median age 10 days, range 1 to 22 days). The median age of the patients ≥18 years old was 45 years (range 18 to 90). The ratio of female to male patients was 1/1.8 (247/446).

3.2. Underlying Diseases and Mode of Transmission

The underlying diseases/conditions are shown in Table 1. The most common risk factors were diabetes mellitus (20%) and hematological malignancies (15.7%). However, a large proportion of published cases (275, 39.6%) had no identified underlying disease. Of these 275 cases, 239 (87%) developed mucormycosis as a result of trauma or burns. The remaining 36 cases with no underlying diseases and unknown modes of transmission were mostly due to Mucor irregularis [9], Apophysomyces spp. [10], or Saksenaea spp. [11], with a prolonged clinical history, ranging from 5 weeks to 17 years, in 72% of them.
The reported modes of transmission are shown in Table 2. The majority (54%) were trauma, of varying magnitude, from as small as an insulin injection [12] to as large as that resulting from a tornado [13] or from a war injury [14,15]. A significant number of cases (108, 15.6%) were healthcare-associated, while 203 (29.3%) had no known mode of transmission.

3.3. Clinical Presentation

Cutaneous mucormycosis is characterized as localized when only the skin and the subcutaneous tissue are involved, as having deep extension when the infection invades underlying muscle, tendons, or bone, and as disseminated when it affects other, noncontiguous organs. In this review, 291 (42.5%) patients had localized infections, 304 (44.5%) had deep extension of the disease, and 90 (13%) had disseminated mucormycosis. In the majority of cases with disseminated disease, that is, in 67/90 (74%), the portal of entry for the fungus was considered to be the skin, while in 16/90 (18%), the mycosis disseminated to the skin from an internal organ, mainly from the lung. In seven cases (8%), the portal of entry was not clear because the diagnosis of cutaneous and pulmonary mucormycosis was made simultaneously.
The upper and lower extremities were the most common sites of cutaneous mucormycosis, but any area of the skin could be affected (Figure 4).
The clinical manifestations of cutaneous mucormycosis vary. In the present review, 70 (10%) cases did not have a detailed description of signs and symptoms, so the analysis was completed for 623 cases. The classical clinical sign of mucormycosis is a black eschar. However, not all cases present in the same way, and, quite often, the initial presentation is different. In 346 (55%) cases, the words “necrosis”, “necrotic”, or “necrotizing” were used to describe the cutaneous lesions. In 59 (9%) cases, the word “eschar” was used, and in another 10 cases, the phrase “blackish discoloration” of the skin, the wound, or the ulcer was used. The infection was described as “cellulitis” in 20 cases and as “abscess” in seven. Before the full-blown picture of necrosis emerged, in many cases, the initial presentation was a small nodule [16], erythematous nodules [17], ulcerative, nodular wounds [18], vesicles grouped in a circular fashion [19], an ulcer with a white mold-like growth after a spider bite [20], a cottony growth [21], a small blister [22], tender, purpuric macules with peripheral erythema [23], a 1-cm hard papule [24], a vesicular eruption [25], an indurated mass [26], or an indurated, woody, and hard swelling [27]. In two cases, the infection presented as a “purple bull’s-eye lesion” [28] or ‘‘bull’s-eye infarct” [29]. In another three, the lesions were described as ecthyma gangrenosum [30], “erythema nodosum-like rash” [31], or “pyoderma gangrenosum-like” [32]. Pain severity varied. The lesions were completely painless in some cases, and painful or very painful in others. The patients could also have signs and symptoms of sepsis, depending on the underlying disease and the extent of the infection.
In the majority of cases, the infection progressed rapidly, sometimes leading to gangrene and hematogenous dissemination. However, there are several case reports, mainly from China, presenting cases of mucormycosis due to Mucor irregularis, where the infection progressed very slowly [33]. In addition to M. irregularis, cases due to Saksenaea vasiformis have been reported to progress over months [11,34]. There have also been reports of slowly progressing lesions due to Mucor hiemalis [35,36], Syncephalastrum sp. [37], and Rhizopus microsporus [38,39].

3.4. Diagnosis/Infecting Organisms

Of the 693 reported cases, 563 were diagnosed by both histopathology and culture, another 11 with histopathology and tissue PCR, and 6 were diagnosed post-mortem, with autopsy and culture. Therefore, in total, 580 (83.6%) of the published cases were proven. Biopsies were performed in 658 cases (95%), direct microscopy in 214 (31%), and cultures in 645 (93%). The cultures were positive in 595 of 645 cases (92%), and a mucoralean fungus was identified at the genus- or species-level in a total of 605 cases. In further 11 cases with negative or not-performed cultures, mucoralean species were identified by PCR and sequencing. The isolated fungi are shown in Table 3, and their geographic distribution in Figure 5.
There were several cases where more than one fungus was isolated. In one case of disseminated mucormycosis with a hematological malignancy and HSCT, R. microsporus and Lichtheimia spp. were isolated [40]. In another two patients with neutropenia due to hematological malignancies, Aspergillus spp. was isolated in addition to Mucor circinelloides in one [41] and Rhizopus rhizopodiformis in the other [42]. In an immunocompetent patient who had a farm-related accident, Lichtheimia sp., Rhizopus sp., and Aspergillus sp. were isolated [43], while in another patient who was in a traffic accident, Rhizomucor sp. and Fusarium sp. were found [44]. Sequencing was performed in 158 cases, MALDI-TOF in eight, tissue PCR in 14, and pan-fungal PCR in four cases.

3.5. Treatment and Outcome

The patients received antifungal medication and/or surgery. Surgery consisted either of local debridement or amputation of an infected limb. Antifungals were given to 610 (88%) patients and surgery was performed on 537 (77%). In 483 (70%) cases, treatment included both antifungals and surgery. The drug used more frequently was an amphotericin B formulation (560 cases, 81%). More specifically, liposomal amphotericin B was given in 262 (38%) cases, amphotericin B lipid complex in 18 (2%), amphotericin B deoxycholate in 238 (34%), and unspecified amphotericin B in 42 (6%), isavuconazole in 10 (1%), posaconazole in 85 (12%), and caspofungin in 10 (1%), either alone or in combination.
Crude mortality was 34%, excluding the 12 patients who left against medical advice. The mortality of neonates (aged < 1 month) was 48%. Ninety-two percent of these neonates were premature. Mortality according to clinical presentation was 18% for localized, 39% for deeply extended, and 70% for disseminated infection. As shown in Table 3, mucormycosis due to Cunningamella spp. was associated with a significantly higher mortality (67%), while with the other genera mortality ranged from 20% to 42%. The mortality of the 54 patients who were treated only with surgery was 46.2%; of the 127 treated only with antifungals, the mortality was 36%, and the mortality of the 483 treated with both antifungals and surgery was 29.6%.

4. Discussion

Cutaneous mucormycosis is the third most common type of mucormycosis, following rhino-orbito-cerebral and pulmonary. We present here an update of its epidemiology, clinical features, predisposing risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. We performed a systematic review, according to the PRISMA guidelines, and found 693 eligible cases, published from 1958 to 2021. There are publications reporting increased incidence of mucormycosis in general, as a result either of an increased prevalence of diabetes, especially in Asia, or of new treatments for malignancies and autoimmune diseases [4,5]. However, it is not possible to estimate the exact incidence or prevalence of cutaneous mucormycosis, because most data are from case reports or case series. Most cases included in the present review were from the USA (249) and India (118). There are multiple factors leading to increased numbers of mucormycosis in a country. There may actually be high incidence, or an increased rate of recognition because of better awareness, expertise, and competence in mycological diagnosis [45]. From 1958 to 2000, there were only 8 cases of cutaneous mucormycosis published from India, and 134 from the USA. As the diagnostic facilities in healthcare centers of developing countries are improving, the number of cases reported, especially from India, are increasing alarmingly. COVID-19 is another factor contributing to the increase of cases of mucormycosis, mainly in India and neighboring countries [46]. In a study by Patel et al., during the first wave of COVID-19 infection, a 2.1-times increase in mucormycosis cases was observed, compared to the previous year [47]. However, the most common clinical presentation of Coronavirus disease-associated mucormycosis (CAM) is rhino-orbital, and cutaneous cases are very rare [47,48,49,50]. In the current review, there was only one case of CAM in a patient with diabetes mellitus, who had recently undergone heart transplantation [51].
The principal risk factor for mucormycosis in India is uncontrolled diabetes mellitus [4]. In the present review, diabetes mellitus was globally reported in 20% of cases, being, thus, the most common underlying disease. In the cases from the USA, diabetes was present in 16.4%, while in the ones from India, it was present in 24.5%. Hematological malignancies were the second most common underlying disease, present in 15.7% of cases. In the USA, they were the main risk factor in 18.4% of cases, while in India, they were so only in 4.2% of cases. The trend in Europe was similar to that in the USA. An important finding is that in 39.6% of published cases, the patients were immunocompetent. The number was higher in cases from India, where 58.4% had no identified underlying disease, as well as in cases from China (57%) and Australia (60%). In neonates, the most common condition predisposing to cutaneous mucormycosis was prematurity and extremely low birth weight, as has been previously reported in the literature [52].
Cutaneous mucormycosis develops when there is a disruption of the normal protective cutaneous barrier. This is usually the result of trauma, which leads to the direct inoculation of spores into the skin. When the host has no underlying diseases and the trauma is minor, the infection may be contained if diagnosed early. However, when the patient has sustained major trauma and there are recurring episodes of sepsis, shock, and multiple blood transfusions, an immune-deficient state emerges, predisposing to the development of mucormycosis [53]. Furthermore, if the host is immunocompromised, even a minor trauma may lead to dissemination. In the current review, trauma—including burns—was the mode of transmission in 54.1% of cases (Table 2). A large proportion was due to motor vehicle accidents (104/375, 27.7%). In a case series by Ingram et al. [54], the proportion of cases with an MVA-associated trauma with no other risk factors was 78%, a number significantly higher than that published in older reviews (3%, 20%) [1,55]. The authors stated that all of these cases involved either unrestrained passengers or motorcycles, and hypothesized that this may have resulted in higher direct environmental trauma and, hence, greater opportunity for wound contamination with Mucorales [54]. Another complicating factor in trauma from MVAs, leading to increased mortality, are burns [54,56,57].
Other cases of major trauma were due to natural disasters. Eight cases of necrotizing fasciitis because of mucormycosis were diagnosed in 1985, when a volcanic eruption of major proportions wiped out the town of Armero in Colombia [58]. They were not included in this review, because there was no description of individual patient data. The patients suffered major injuries progressing rapidly to extensive lesions. Six of them died despite radical debridement and amputations. In four of them, the fungus was identified as R. arrhizus. Only two received amphotericin B, but the diagnosis was delayed [58]. Three more reported cases emerged after the tsunami in the Indian Ocean in 2004 [59,60,61]. Two were due to Apophysomyces elegans and survived after extensive debridement, intensive care, and antifungal treatment [59,60]. A third one had mucormycosis with Mucor sp. [61]. A cluster of 13 cases of necrotizing cutaneous mucormycosis was also reported among the survivors of the tornado in Joplin, Missouri in 2011. The infections were caused by Apophysomyces trapeziformis, following lacerations and penetrating injuries from airborne material, including soil, gravel, wood, and glass. Mortality was 38% [13]. It must be stressed that infections in survivors of natural disasters are multimicrobial, with most patients suffering bacterial infections. Mycoses could be, thus, under-diagnosed, given also their similarity to bacterial infections, particularly during the early stages of infection [62]. With climate change and global warming contributing to greater frequency and severity of extreme weather events [63], the numbers of disaster-associated fungal infections, mucormycosis included, could increase. Therefore, efforts should be made to increase the index of suspicion. Histopathology examinations are crucial for early diagnosis and the prompt initiation of the appropriate treatment in these patients.
Combat-related injuries are another type of major trauma predisposing to mucormycosis and other invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In the case series published by Warkentien et al. [64], presenting IFIs in US military personnel injured in Afghanistan, Mucorales were cultured from 16 (43%) of the 37 analyzed cases. In 28% of cases, multiple mold species were isolated from the infected wounds. Common findings included blast injury during foot patrol (100%), with traumatic lower extremity amputation, and large-volume blood transfusions. Rodriguez et al. [65] showed in a multivariate analysis that these were the major risk factors for IFIs in combat-related trauma.
Mucorales are ubiquitous in nature, and spores can be found in soil, compost piles, fruits, and decaying organic material, so accidents occurring in farms, or during gardening, may lead to mucormycosis. Minor trauma, such as bites from insects or animals, have also been implicated in the transmission of the infection. In eight published cases, mucormycosis was the result of immersion in freshwater: in three of them, the patient had been swimming in a river or brackish water, and did not recall any trauma [66,67,68]; in another two, there was a history of small lacerations sustained in water [69,70], while in the other three, there was a history of a severe sailing accident in a river [71], near drowning in a polluted bayou [72], and immersion in freshwater after extensive burning in the third one [73].
Most mucormycosis cases are community-acquired. However, nosocomial acquisition is very important. In our review, 15.6% of cases were healthcare-associated, mainly from adhesive tapes or bandages, and intravenous or arterial catheters. Surgical wounds may also be complicated by mucormycosis, either directly or due to contaminated dressings. Intramuscular or even subcutaneous injections are another source of infection by Mucorales. A relatively large number has been published by Chander et al. [6,74,75], who reported 12 such cases. Of those, only three had underlying diabetes mellitus, and 50% died because of necrotizing fasciitis. Outbreaks have also been linked to contaminated hospital linens [40,76]. Burn patients hospitalized in intensive care units are particularly susceptible to fungal infection because of the loss of the skin barrier and acquired immune deficiency. In a single-center study in a specialized referral burn unit, mortality for patients with mucormycosis was 62% [77].
The clinical diagnosis of cutaneous mucormycosis has a low sensitivity and specificity because the necrotic eschar may not be present and its absence does not preclude the diagnosis [78]. A small blister or nodule may be overlooked, or, in the case of necrotizing fasciitis, multiple bacteria may be isolated. The diagnosis may be challenging in burn patients due to atypical wound aspects, which are the result of skin excision and grafting. In addition, there are cases of mucormycosis, mainly due to M. irregularis, where the infection progresses very slowly, in contrast to the classical presentation of mucormycosis. Xia ZK et al. [33] describes a case where the patient “developed a localized inflammatory lesion 14 years ago, following the excision of a pea-sized red tubercle on the right paranasal area” (sic) and finally “developed progressive destruction of the nasal sinus, nasal septum, soft and hard palates, and uvula.” A high index of suspicion is, therefore, required. In cases of minor or major trauma, even if the patient is immunocompetent, mucormycosis should be included in the differential diagnosis. Direct microscopy of KOH wet mounts provides a rapid presumptive diagnosis, and it is strongly recommended, along with histopathology, by a panel of experts of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (ECMM/MSG ERC) [79]; however, in our review, it was performed in only 31% of cases. Definitive diagnosis is made with the combination of histopathology and culture. Histopathology is very important, because it shows that the infection is invasive. For example, in a case of a cirrhotic patient who fell on a crab trap and developed cellulitis, both A. elegans and Fusarium sp. were isolated, but histopathology revealed that Fusarium was just a colonizer and was not invading the tissues [80]. However, even when fungal hyphae are seen in histopathologic analysis, fungal cultures are positive in only 50% of cases [81]. In the current study, cultures were performed in 93% of cases, and 92% of those were positive. This is probably due to publication bias.
As shown in Figure 5, there was a significant geographic variation of Mucorales organisms causing cutaneous mucormycosis. In Europe, N. America, and S. America, the most common genus was Rhizopus spp. Of the 61 cases due to Lichtheimia spp., 40 (65.5%) were from Europe. This is consistent with findings from other studies [2,82]. In Asia, the most commonly isolated genus was Apophysomyces spp. (34.7%), followed by Rhizopus spp. [24%] and Saksenaea spp. [18%]. In several publications, it has been reported that Apophysomyces spp. and Saksenaea spp. can initiate disease in apparently normal hosts, following penetrating trauma during accidents in tropical and sub-tropical areas [45,83]. In the analysis of 122 cases of posttraumatic mucormycosis from the literature by Lelievre et al. [84], S. vasiformis and A. elegans complex were responsible for 9% and 18.9% of cases, respectively. In India, A. elegans is the second most common causative agent, after R. arrhizus [45]. In the current review, 33% of cases from Australia were due to Saksenaea spp., 28% to Rhizopus spp., and 20.5% to Apophysomyces spp., while in America and Europe, Rhizopus spp. was the most commonly isolated genus. Another species, which was found almost exclusively in cases from Asia (China and India), was Mucor irregularis. It should be noted, however, that several of the cases of Rhizomucor spp. reported from Europe, Asia, and N. America were in fact M. irregularis. Rhizomucor variabilis was renamed as M. irregularis because results of rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing showed closer phylogenetic distance to Mucor species, especially M. hiemalis [85,86]. As molecular-based assays are evolving, they are used more often to aid in the detection or the identification of Mucorales.
Rapid diagnosis of mucormycosis and the early initiation of treatment are of paramount importance. Management consists of the reversal of risk factors, if possible, antifungal therapy, and surgical treatment. First-line treatment with high-dose liposomal amphotericin B is strongly recommended [79]. Amphotericin B deoxycholate, however, may be the only option in resource-limited settings. In our review, liposomal amphotericin B was reportedly administered in 38% of cases, and amphotericin B deoxycholate in 34%, mainly in older cases or in those from developing countries. In newer publications, there are also reports of using posaconazole or isavuconazole. In cutaneous mucormycosis, surgical treatment is much more commonly feasible than with the other types of mucormycosis. In the “RetroZygo” study from France, more patients (94%) underwent surgery for posttraumatic mucormycosis than did those with other forms (48%), and survival at day 90 was greater in post-traumatic mucormycosis (88%), in comparison to that of other types of mucormycosis (48%) [87,88]. In an older publication by Adam et al. [89], disease-related mortality among patients with involvement of only an extremity was 15.5%, while the combined mortality associated with disease of the other locations was 32%. In the current review, the crude mortality of patients with mucormycosis of extremities and other locations was 26% and 43%, respectively. The lower mortality associated with disease of the extremities may be due to the fact that complete debridement of the infected tissue is more easily performed in these patients. Surgical debridement consists of a complete resection of necrotic tissue, with a careful re-evaluation of the wound, in order to diagnose the remaining infection. Multiple debridements are routine, and there have been reports of 19 or 20 repeat debridements, or a final amputation [90]. McDermott et al. proposed calcofluor fluorescence microscopy as a method for guiding the extent of intraoperative surgical debridement [91]. Kyriopoulos et al., reporting from a department of plastic surgery and burns, suggested that, in addition to systemic antifungal therapy, the local application of impregnated dressings on the wound bed should be used, and stressed that the plastic surgeon must be patient and wait for negative swab cultures and biopsies prior to reconstruction [92].
In the current review, mortality was significantly lower when both antifungals and surgery were applied. This is consistent with previous publications [82]. However, even in cases of localized infection, mortality was 18%, which is not negligible. Efforts should be made to optimize diagnosis and treatment of this potentially lethal fungal infection.

Strength and Limitations

The current review is the most recent and largest analysis of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cutaneous mucormycosis. It is a systematic review, and stringent inclusion criteria were applied. However, it is possible that some cases may have been overlooked. Furthermore, the review was retrospective, and not designed to search specifically for mortality or any other parameters of the disease. In addition, publication bias is a limitation, because case reports of unusual or atypical cases are more likely to be published.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8020194/s1, File S1: Articles included in the analysis for the systematic review.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to the conceptualisation of the idea given in the manuscript; methodology, A.S.; software, E.D.; validation, G.P., I.P.; formal analysis, A.S. and M.D.-A.; investigation, A.S.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.D.-A. and I.P.; supervision, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roden, M.M.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Buchanan, W.L.; Knudsen, T.A.; Sarkisova, T.A.; Schaufele, R.L.; Sein, M.; Sein, T.; Chiou, C.C.; Chu, J.H.; et al. Epidemiology and out-come of zygomycosis: A review of 929 reported cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 634e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jeong, W.; Keighley, C.; Wolfe, R.; Lee, W.L.; Slavin, M.A.; Kong, D.C.; Chen, S.C.-A. The epidemiology and clinical mani-festations of mucormycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Petrikkos, G.; Skiada, A.; Lortholary, O.; Roilides, E.; Walsh, T.J.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Epidemiology and Clinical Manifesta-tions of Mucormycosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, S23–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chakrabarti, A.; Das, A.; Mandal, J.; Shivaprakash, M.R.; George, V.K.; Tarai, B.; Rao, P.; Panda, N.; Verma, S.C.; Sakhuja, V. The rising trend of invasive zygomycosis in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Saegeman, V.; Maertens, J.; Meersseman, W.; Spriet, I.; Verbeken, E.; Lagrou, K. Increasing Incidence of Mucormycosis in University Hospital, Belgium. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1456–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chander, J.; Singla, N.; Kaur, M.; Punia, R.S.; Attri, A.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; Stchigel, A.M.; Guarro, J. Saksenaea erythrospora, an emerging mucoralean fungus causing severe necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections–a study from a tertiary care hospital in north India. Infect. Dis. 2016, 49, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bonifaz, A.; Stchigel, A.M.; Guarro, J.; Guevara, E.; Pintos, L.; Sanchis, M.; Cano-Lira, J.F. Primary Cutaneous Mucormycosis Produced by the New Species Apophysomyces mexicanus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 4428–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Xia, X.J.; Shen, H.; Liu, Z.H. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis caused byMucor irregularis. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 40, 875–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reddy, I.S.; Rao, N.R.; Shankar Reddy, V.M.; Rao, R. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis (zygomycosis) caused by Apophysomyces elegans. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2008, 74, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanabodee, M.; Sawasdipong, J.; Sudtikoonaseth, P.; Wessagowit, V. Rare indolent zygomycosis caused by subcutaneous Saksenaea vasiformis infection. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2019, 61, e94–e96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Perz, A.; Makar, G.; Fernandez, E.; Weinstock, J.; Rafferty, W. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis of the abdomen at the site of repeated insulin injections. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e233284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fanfair, R.N.; Benedict, K.; Bos, J.; Bennett, S.D.; Lo, Y.-C.; Adebanjo, T.; Etienne, K.; Deak, E.; Derado, G.; Shieh, W.-J.; et al. Necrotizing Cutaneous Mucormycosis after a Tornado in Joplin, Missouri, in 2011. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2214–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lewandowski, L.; Purcell, R.; Fleming, M.; Gordon, W.T. The use of dilute Dakin’s solution for the treatment of angioinvasive fungal infection in the combat wounded: A case series. Mil. Med. 2013, 178, e503–e507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Radowsky, J.S.; Strawn, A.A.; Sherwood, J.; Braden, A.; Liston, W. Invasive Mucormycosis and Aspergillosis in a Healthy 22-Year-Old Battle Casualty: Case Report. Surg. Infect. 2011, 12, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baradkar, V.P.; Kumar, S. Cutaneous zygomycosis due to Saksenaea vasiformis in an immunocompetent host. Indian J. Dermatol. 2009, 54, 382–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. García-Pajares, F.; Sánchez-Antolín, G.; Alvárez, C.A.; Rubiales, B.M.; Núñez-Rodríguez, H.; del Val, L.S.; Ruiz-Zorrilla, R.; Barrera, A.; Gómez-Nieto, A.; Herrero, I.P.; et al. Cutaneous mucormycosis infection by Absidia in two consecutive liver transplant patients. Transplant. Proc. 2012, 44, 1562–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zachary, D.; Chapin, K.; Binns, L.; Tashima, K. Cutaneous mucormycosis complicating a polymicrobial wound infection fol-lowing a dog bite. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2011, 2011, 348046. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, M.U.; Flores, M.S.; Vereen, R.; Szabo, S.R.; Logemann, N.F.; Eberly, M.D. Self-resolving superficial primary cutaneous mucormycosis in a 7-week-old infant. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2018, 35, e248–e250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saravia-Flores, M.; Guaran, D.M.; Argueta, V. Invasive cutaneous infection caused by Apophysomyces elegans associated with a spider bite. Mycoses 2010, 53, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Johnson, P.C.; Satterwhite, T.K.; Monheit, J.E.; Parks, D. Primary Cutaneous Mucormycosis in Trauma Patients. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1987, 27, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Al-Qattan, M.M.; Al Mazrou, A.M. Mucormycosis of the Upper Limb. J. Hand Surg. 1996, 21, 261–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hsieh, T.-T.; Tseng, H.-K.; Sun, P.-L.; Wu, Y.-H.; Chen, G.-S. Disseminated Zygomycosis Caused by Cunninghamella bertholletiae in Patient with Hematological Malignancy and Review of Published Case Reports. Mycopathologia 2012, 175, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lye, G.R.; Wood, G.; Graeme, N. Subcutaneous zygomycosis due to Saksenaea vasiformis: Rapid isolate identification using a modified sporulation technique. Pathology 1996, 28, 364–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lumbang, W.A.; Caufield, B.A. Vesicular eruption on the arm of an infant. Dermatol. Online J. 2010, 16, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eaton, M.E.; Padhye, A.A.; Schwartz, D.A.; Steinberg, J.P. Osteomyelitis of the sternum caused by Apophysomyces elegans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 2827–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Desai, R.P.; Joseph, N.M.; Ananthakrishnan, N.; Ambujam, S. Subcutaneous zygomycosis caused by Mucor hiemalis in an immunocompetent patient. Australas. Med. J. 2013, 6, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hansen, J.P.; Kristjansson, A.K.; Stone, M.S. A Neutropenic Child with a Purple Lesion on the Thigh. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2007, 24, 560–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rubin, A.I.; Grossman, M.E. Bull’s-eye cutaneous infarct of zygomycosis: A bedside diagnosis confirmed by touch preparation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2004, 51, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marchevsky, A.M.; Bottone, E.J.; Geller, S.A.; Giger, D.K. The changing spectrum of disease, etiology, and diagnosis of mucormycosis. Hum. Pathol. 1980, 11, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nouri-Majalan, N.; Moghimi, M. Skin mucormycosis presenting as an erythema-nodosum-like rash in a renal transplant re-cipient: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2008, 2, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kerr, O.; Bong, C.; Wallis, C.; Tidman, M. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis masquerading as pyoderma gangrenosum. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 150, 1212–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xia, Z.-K.; Wang, W.-L.; Yang, R.-Y. Slowly Progressive Cutaneous, Rhinofacial, and Pulmonary Mucormycosis Caused by Mucor irregularis in an Immunocompetent Woman. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 56, 993–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Parker, C.; Kaminski, G.; Hill, D. Zygomycosis in a tattoo, caused by Saksenaea vasiformis. Australas. J. Dermatol. 1986, 27, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Prevoo, R.L.; Starink, T.M.; de Haan, P. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis in a healthy young girl: Report of a case caused by Mucor hiemalis Wehmer. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1991, 24, 882–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Oliveira-Neto, M.P.; Da Silva, M.; Fialho Monteiro, P.C.; Lazera, M.; de Almeida Paes, R.; Novellino, A.B.; Cuzzi, T. Cutaneous mucormycosis in a young, immunocompetent girl. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Amatya, R.; Khanal, B.; Rijal, A. Syncephalastrum species producing mycetoma-like lesions. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2010, 76, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Bao, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, L.; Li, F.; Xu, J.; Liang, J. Cutaneous mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus microsporus in an immu-nocompetent patient: A case report and review of literature. Medicine 2018, 97, e11141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. West, B.C.; Oberle, A.D.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus microsporus var. microsporus: Cellulitis in the leg of a diabetic patient cured by amputation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 3341–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Cheng, V.C.C.; Chen, J.H.K.; Wong, S.C.Y.; Leung, S.S.M.; So, S.Y.C.; Lung, D.C.; Lee, W.-M.; Trendell-Smith, N.J.; Chan, W.-M.; Ng, D.; et al. Hospital Outbreak of Pulmonary and Cutaneous Zygomycosis due to Contaminated Linen Items From Substandard Laundry. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 62, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dodémont, M.; Hites, M.; Bailly, B.; Trepant, A.L.; De Mendonça, R.; Denis, O.; Jacobs, F.; Montesinos, I. When you can’t see the wood for the trees. Mucor circinelloides: A rare case of primary cutaneous zygomycosis. J. Mycol. Med. 2015, 25, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Maertens, J.; Demuynck, H.; Verbeken, E.; Zachee, P.; Verhoef, G.; Vandenberghe, P.; Boogaerts, M.A. Mucormycosis in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients: Report of five cases and review of the role of iron overload in the pathogenesis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999, 24, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Gordon, G.; Indeck, M.; Bross, J.; Kapoor, D.A.; Brotman, S. Injury from Silage Wagon Accident Complicated by Mucormycosis. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1988, 28, 866–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vitrat-Hincky, V.; Lebeau, B.; Bozonnet, E.; Falcon, D.; Pradel, P.; Faure, O.; Aubert, A.; Piolat, C.; Grillot, R.; Pelloux, H. Severe filamentous fungal infections after widespread tissue damage due to traumatic injury: Six cases and review of the literature. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 41, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chakrabarti, A.; Singh, R. Mucormycosis in India: Unique features. Mycoses 2014, 57, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chakrabarti, A. The recent storm over Indian sky. Indian J. Med. Mycol. 2021, 39, 269–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Patel, A.; Agarwal, R.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Shevkani, M.; Xess, I.; Sharma, R.; Savio, J.; Sethuraman, N.; Madan, S.; Shastri, P.; et al. Multicenter Epidemiologic Study of Coronavirus Disease–Associated Mucormycosis, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2349–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arora, U.; Priyadarshi, M.; Katiyar, V.; Soneja, M.; Garg, P.; Gupta, I.; Bharadiya, V.; Berry, P.; Ghosh, T.; Patel, L.; et al. Risk factors for Coronavirus disease-associated mucormycosis. J. Infect. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Walia, S.; Bhaisare, V.; Rawat, P.; Kori, N.; Sharma, M.; Gupta, N.; Urdhwareshwar, S.; Thakur, S.; Arya, N. COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: Preliminary report from a tertiary eye care centre. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saad, R.H.; Mobarak, F.A. The diversity and outcome of post-covid mucormycosis: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2021, 88, 106522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khatri, A.; Chang, K.-M.; Berlinrut, I.; Wallach, F. Mucormycosis after Coronavirus disease 2019 infection in a heart transplant recipient—Case report and review of literature. J. Med. Mycol. 2021, 31, 101125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Roilides, E.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Katragkou, A.; Benjamin, D.K., Jr.; Walsh, T.J. Zygomycosis in neonates: An uncommon but life-threatening infection. Am. J. Perinatol. 2009, 26, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zahoor, B.; Kent, S.; Wall, D. Cutaneous mucormycosis secondary to penetrative trauma. Injury 2016, 47, 1383–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ingram, P.R.; Suthananthan, A.E.; Rajan, R.; Pryce, T.M.; Sieunarine, K.; Gardam, D.J.; Heath, C.H. Cutaneous mucormyco-sis and motor vehicle accidents: Findings from an Australian case series. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Skiada, A.; Rigopoulos, D.; Larios, G.; Petrikkos, G.; Katsambas, A. Global epidemiology of cutaneous zygomycosis. Clin. Dermatol. 2012, 30, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ayala-Gaytán, J.J.; Petersen-Morfín, S.; Guajardo-Lara, C.E.; Barbosa-Quintana, A.; Morfín-Otero, R.; Rodriguez-Noriega, E. Cutaneous zygomycosis in immunocompetent patients in Mexico. Mycoses 2009, 53, 538–540. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanistreet, B.; Bell, D. Burn Wound Mucormycosis: A case study on poor wound healing. J. Burn. Care Res. 2017, 38, e582–e584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Patiño, J.F.; Castro, D.; Valencia, A.; Morales, P. Necrotizing soft tissue lesions after a volcanic cataclysm. World J. Surg. 1991, 15, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Snell, B.J.; Tavakoli, K. Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Apophysomyces elegans Complicating Soft-Tissue and Pelvic Injuries in a Tsunami Survivor from Thailand. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007, 119, 448–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andresen, D.; Donaldson, A.; Choo, L.; Knox, A.; Klaassen, M.; Ursic, C.; Vonthethoff, L.; Krilis, S.; Konecny, P. Multifocal cutaneous mucormycosis complicating polymicrobial wound infections in a tsunami survivor from Sri Lanka. Lancet 2005, 365, 876–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maegele, M.; Gregor, S.; Yuecel, N.; Simanski, C.; Paffrath, T.; Rixen, D.; Heiss, M.M.; Rudroff, C.; Saad, S.; Perbix, W.; et al. One year ago not business as usual: Wound management, infection and psychoemotional control during tertiary medical care following the 2004 Tsunami disaster in Southeast Asia. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Benedict, K.; Park, B.J. Invasive Fungal Infections after Natural Disasters. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. E Huppert, H.; Sparks, R.S.J. Extreme natural hazards: Population growth, globalization and environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2006, 364, 1875–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Warkentien, T.; Rodriguez, C.; Lloyd, B.; Wells, J.; Weintrob, A.; Dunne, J.R.; Ganesan, A.; Li, P.; Bradley, W.; Gaskins, L.J.; et al. Invasive Mold Infections Following Combat-related Injuries. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 1441–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Rodriguez, C.J.; Weintrob, A.C.; Shah, J.; Malone, D.; Dunne, J.R.; Weisbrod, A.B.; Lloyd, B.A.; Warkentien, T.E.; Murray, C.K.; Wilkins, K.; et al. Risk Factors Associated with Invasive Fungal Infections in Combat Trauma. Surg. Infect. 2014, 15, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Giordano, G.N.; Abiega, C.; Chipre, E.; Garcia-Effron, G.; Caeiro, J.P. Severe Cunninghamella infection in an HIV patient: Af-ter cenotes exposure in Mexico. Open J. Clin. Med. Case Rep. 2019, 5, 1545. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mizutari, K.; Nishimoto, K.; Ono, T. Cutaneous mucormycosis. J. Dermatol. 1999, 26, 174–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reich, P.; Shute, T.; Lysen, C.; Lockhart, S.R.; Keating, M.; Custer, P.; Orscheln, R. Saksenaea vasiformis orbital cellulitis in an immunocompetent child treated with posaconazole. J. Pediatric Infect. Dis. Soc. 2018, 7, e169–e171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Stewardson, A.J.; Holmes, N.E.; Ellis, D.H.; Howden, B.P. Cutaneous zygomycosis caused by Saksenaea vasiformis following water-related wound in a 24-year-old immunocompetent woman. Mycoses 2009, 52, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Losee, J.E.; Selber, J.; Vega, S.; Hall, C.; Scott, G.; Serletti, J.M. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis: Guide to surgical manage-ment. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2002, 49, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Relloso, S.; Romano, V.; Landaburu, M.F.; Herrera, F.; Smayevsky, J.; Veciño, C.; Mujica, M.T. Saksenaea erythrospora infection following a serious sailing accident. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chaney, S.; Gopalan, R.; Berggren, R.E. Pulmonary Pseudallescheria boydii infection with cutaneous zygomycosis after near drowning. South. Med. J. 2004, 97, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Delacruz, W.; Calvano, T.P.; Griffith, M.E.; White, C.E.; Kim, S.H.; Sutton, D.A.; Thompson, E.H.; Fu, J.; Wickes, B.; Guarro, J.; et al. Invasive Apophysomyces variabilis Infection in a Burn Patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2814–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chander, J.; Kaur, J.; Attri, A.; Mohan, H. Primary cutaneous zygomycosis from a tertiary care centre in north-west India. Indian J. Med Res. 2010, 131, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Chander, J.; Stchigel, A.M.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Jayant, M.; Bala, K.; Rani, H.; Handa, U.; Punia, R.S.; Dalal, U.; Attri, A.K.; et al. Fungal necrotizing fasciitis, an emerging infectious disease caused by Apophysomyces (Mucorales). Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2015, 32, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Duffy, J.; Harris, J.; Gade, L.; Sehulster, L.; Newhouse, E.; O’Connell, H.; Noble-Wang, J.; Rao, C.; Balajee, S.A.; Chiller, T. Mucormycosis Outbreak Associated with Hospital Linens. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014, 33, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Legrand, M.; Gits-Muselli, M.; Boutin, L.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Maurel, V.; Soussi, S.; Benyamina, M.; Ferry, A.; Chaussard, M.; Hamane, S.; et al. Detection of Circulating Mucorales DNA in Critically Ill Burn Patients: Preliminary Report of a Screening Strategy for Early Diagnosis and Treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 1312–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Skiada, A.; Pavleas, I.; Drogari-Apiranthitou, M. Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Mucormycosis: An Update. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cornely, O.A.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Arenz, D.; Chen, S.C.A.; Dannaoui, E.; Hochhegger, B.; Hoenigl, M.; Jensen, H.E.; Lagrou, K.; Lewis, R.E. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: An initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in coopera-tion with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, e405–e421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kimura, M.; Smith, M.B.; McGinnis, M.R. Zygomycosis due to Apophysomyces elegans. Report of 2 cases and review of the lit-erature. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1999, 123, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Skiada, A.; Lass-Floerl, C.; Klimko, N.; Ibrahim, A.; Roilides, E.; Petrikkos, G. Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, S93–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Skiada, A.; Pagano, L.; Groll, A.; Zimmerli, S.; Dupont, B.; Lagrou, K.; Lass-Florl, C.; Bouza, E.; Klimko, N.; Gaustad, P.; et al. Zygomycosis in Europe: Analysis of 230 cases ac-crued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1859–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Gomes, M.Z.R.; Lewis, R.E.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Mucormycosis Caused by Unusual Mucormycetes, Non-Rhizopus, -Mucor, and -Lichtheimia Species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 411–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Lelievre, L.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Abdoul, H.; Hivelin, M.; Chouaki, T.; Toubas, D.; Mamez, A.C.; Lantieri, L.; Lortholary, O.; Lanternier, F.; et al. Posttraumatic mucormycosis: A nationwide study in France and review of the literature. Medicine 2014, 93, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lu, X.L.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Dolatabadi, S.; Ran, Y.P.; Gerrits van den Ende, A.H.; Shen, Y.N.; Li, C.Y.; Xi, L.Y.; Hao, F.; Li, R.Y.; et al. Taxonomy and epidemi-ology of Mucor irregularis, agent of chronic cutaneous mucormycosis. Persoonia 2013, 30, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Walther, G.; Wagner, L.; Kurzai, O. Updates on the Taxonomy of Mucorales with an Emphasis on Clinically Important Taxa. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Lanternier, F.; Dannaoui, E.; Morizot, G.; Elie, C.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Huerre, M.; Bitar, D.; Dromer, F.; Lortholary, O. The French Mycosis Study Group a Global Analysis of Mucormycosis in France: The RetroZygo Study (2005-2007). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, S35–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Walsh, T.J.; Hospenthal, D.R.; Petraitis, V.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Necrotizing mucormycosis of wounds following combat injuries, natural disasters, burns, and other trauma. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Adam, R.D.; Hunter, G.; DiTomasso, J.; Comerci, J.G. Mucormycosis: Emerging Prominence of Cutaneous Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1994, 19, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Moran, S.L.; Strickland, J.; Shin, A.Y. Upper-Extremity Mucormycosis Infections in Immunocompetent Patients. J. Hand Surg. 2006, 31, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McDermott, N.E.; Barrett, J.; Hipp, J.; Merino, M.J.; Lee, C.C.R.; Waterman, P.; Domingo, D.L.; Walsh, T.J. Successful treatment of periodontal mu-cormycosis: Report of a case and literature review. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010, 109, e64–e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kyriopoulos, E.J.; Kyriakopoulos, A.; Karonidis, A.; Gravvanis, A.; Gamatsi, I.; Tsironis, C.; Tsoutsos, D. Burn injuries and soft tissue traumas complicated by mucormycosis infection: A report of six cases and review of the literature. Ann. Burn. Fire Disasters 2015, 28, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
Jof 08 00194 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram describing the identification of eligible cases.
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram describing the identification of eligible cases.
Jof 08 00194 g001
Jof 08 00194 g002 550
Figure 2. Cases of cutaneous mucormycosis per year from 1958 to 30 June 2021.
Figure 2. Cases of cutaneous mucormycosis per year from 1958 to 30 June 2021.
Jof 08 00194 g002
Jof 08 00194 g003 550
Figure 3. Geographic distribution of cases. Countries in the figure had at least four cases. The rest were: Thailand, Qatar, and Argentina had three cases each; Tunisia, Singapore, S. Korea, Poland, and Czech Republic had two cases each; Sweden, Portugal, Finland, Lithuania, Guatemala, Ecuador, Sri Lanka, Oman, Nepal, Kuwait, and South Africa had one case each.
Figure 3. Geographic distribution of cases. Countries in the figure had at least four cases. The rest were: Thailand, Qatar, and Argentina had three cases each; Tunisia, Singapore, S. Korea, Poland, and Czech Republic had two cases each; Sweden, Portugal, Finland, Lithuania, Guatemala, Ecuador, Sri Lanka, Oman, Nepal, Kuwait, and South Africa had one case each.
Jof 08 00194 g003
Jof 08 00194 g004 550
Figure 4. Anatomic site of infection.
Figure 4. Anatomic site of infection.
Jof 08 00194 g004
Jof 08 00194 g005 550
Figure 5. Geographic distribution of causative Mucorales organisms. Two cases were from Tunisia, Africa, and are not included in the Figure. * All Mucor species except Mucor irregularis.
Figure 5. Geographic distribution of causative Mucorales organisms. Two cases were from Tunisia, Africa, and are not included in the Figure. * All Mucor species except Mucor irregularis.
Jof 08 00194 g005
Table
Table 1. Underlying diseases/conditions predisposing to mucormycosis.
Table 1. Underlying diseases/conditions predisposing to mucormycosis.
Underlying Disease/Condition Cases
n % a
Diabetes mellitus13920
Hematological malignancy10915.7
  Acute myeloid leukemia42
  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia34
  Chronic myeloid leukemia5
  Chronic lymphocytic leukemia5
  Myelodysplastic syndrome9
  Lymphoma13
  Multiple myeloma1
Aplastic anemia81
Allogeneic transplantation284
Solid organ malignancy71
  Lung1
  Brain2
  Osteosarcoma1
  Renal1
  Prostate1
  Colon1
Solid organ transplantation578.2
  Renal22
  Liver21
  Heart9
  Lung2
  Multi-visceral3
Neutropenia456.4
Corticosteroids598.5
Autoimmune disease233.3
  Systemic lupus erythematosus7
  Inflammatory bowel disease4
  Rheumatoid arthritis3
  Psoriasis2
  Other b7
Renal failure223.1
HIV111.5
Prematurity202.8
Extreme low birth weight172.4
Cirrhosis71
Alcoholism60.8
Malnutrition30.4
Other c101.4
None27539.6
a The sum of the underlying diseases is greater than 100% because, in many cases, there were more than one. b Other includes two cases of angiitis, two of pemphigoid, one of autoimmune hepatitis, one autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and one idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. c Other includes two cases of beta-thalassemia, one case of CARD9 deficiency, two cases of hyposplenism, two of toxic epidermal necrolysis, one case of malabsorption syndrome, one of multiorgan failure, one Pearson syndrome (deferoxamine treatment), and one COVID-19 infection.
Table
Table 2. Modes of transmission.
Table 2. Modes of transmission.
Mode of Transmission Cases
n%
Major trauma23533.9
  Motor vehicle accident (MVA)104
  Surgery47
  Burn33
  Natural disaster22
  Crush injury8
  War injuries6
  Fall12
  Farm accidents3
Minor trauma11716.9
  Injection sites41
  Insect/arthropod bites16
  Animal bites/scratches/kicks8
  Gardening/plants22
  Other minor injury30
Other trauma233.3
Healthcare associated 10815.6
  Adhesive tapes/bandages37
  Catheter insertion sites46
  Hospital linen8
  Herbal dressings on trauma3
  Karaya ostomy bags2
  Thoracic, abdominal drains3
  Wooden tongue depressors3
  Other nosocomial material6
Immersion in freshwater81
Unknown20329.3
Table
Table 3. Isolated fungi.
Table 3. Isolated fungi.
OrganismsCasesMortality
n (%)n (%)
Apophysomyces109 (18)46 (42)
A. elegans58
A. mexicanus1
A. trapeziformis20
A. variabilis30
Cunninghamella18 (3) 12 (67)
C. bertholletiae13
Cunninghamella spp.5
Lichtheimia61 (10)12 (20)
L. corymbifera45
L. ramosa7
Lichtheimia spp.9
Mucor75 (12)20 (27)
M. circinelloides12
M. hiemalis5
M. indicus2
M. irregularis21
M. pusillus3
M. ramosissimus1
M. velutinosus1
Mucor spp.30
Rhizomucor18 (3)4 (22)
R. pusillus4
R. variabilis4
Rhizomucor spp.10
Rhizopus209 (34)78 (37)
R. arrhizus (oryzae)78
R. azygosporus1
R. delemar3
R. homothallicus1
R. microsporus24
R. microsporus var. rhizopodiformis15
R. oligosporus1
R. pusillus1
R. stolonifer2
Rhizopus spp.83
Saksenaea59 (10)8 (13)
S. vasiformis49
S. erythrospora9
Saksenaea spp.1
Syncephalastrum4 (1)1 (25)
S. racemosum1
Syncephalastrum spp.3
Unidentified Mucorales52 (9)22 (42)
Total605203 (33)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skiada, A.; Drogari-Apiranthitou, M.; Pavleas, I.; Daikou, E.; Petrikkos, G. Global Cutaneous Mucormycosis: A Systematic Review. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020194

AMA Style

Skiada A, Drogari-Apiranthitou M, Pavleas I, Daikou E, Petrikkos G. Global Cutaneous Mucormycosis: A Systematic Review. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(2):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skiada, Anna, Maria Drogari-Apiranthitou, Ioannis Pavleas, Eirini Daikou, and George Petrikkos. 2022. "Global Cutaneous Mucormycosis: A Systematic Review" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 2: 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop