Next Article in Journal
Reply to Cosio et al. Glycation of Nail Proteins as a Risk Factor for Onychomycosis. Comment on “Gupta et al. Diabetic Foot and Fungal Infections: Etiology and Management from a Dermatologic Perspective. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 577”
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four New Species of Conocybe (Bolbitiaceae, Agaricales) from the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China
 
 
Comment
Peer-Review Record

Glycation of Nail Proteins as a Risk Factor for Onychomycosis. Comment on Gupta et al. Diabetic Foot and Fungal Infections: Etiology and Management from a Dermatologic Perspective. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 577

J. Fungi 2025, 11(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11010046
by Terenzio Cosio 1,2,*, Isabel Valsecchi 2, Roberta Gaziano 1, Elena Campione 3 and Françoise Botterel 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
J. Fungi 2025, 11(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11010046
Submission received: 24 October 2024 / Accepted: 2 January 2025 / Published: 8 January 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Although the aforementioned paper by Gupta et al was a general review of the topic, mainly focusing on clinical aspects, I find that the Comment, focusing on mechanisms of fungus-host interaction, clarifies the putative mechanisms behind the increased incidence of tinea unguium in diabetics

Line 41-43, “In particular, Trichophyton (T.) rubrum and T. mentagrophytes, the leading cause of onychomycosis in diabetes, express carbohydrate-specific adhesins on conidia surface that recognise mannoses and galactoses residues, abundantly expressed in human ECM and on glycated proteins [5,6].”; as T. interdigitale is the second more common dermatophyte in tinea unguium and the mentioned “T. mentagrophytes” is actually T. quinckeanum (the mentioned strain in ref. 5 was ATCC 11481, today classified as T. quinckeanum), “T. mentagrophytes” should be deleted from the sentence.

Back to TopTop