Next Article in Journal
Statins and Cardiomyocyte Metabolism, Friend or Foe?
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Serum Estradiol on Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Levels and Lipid Profiles in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Fibronectin as a Novel Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lipid-Lowering Treatment and the Lipid Goals Attainment in Patients with a Very High Cardiovascular Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/jcdd10100416
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dissecting the Impact of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell ABCA1 versus ABCG1 Expression on Cholesterol Efflux and Macrophage-like Cell Transdifferentiation: The Role of SR-BI

by
Olanrewaju Oladosu
1,
Ikechukwu C. Esobi
1,
Rhonda R. Powell
2,
Terri Bruce
2 and
Alexis Stamatikos
1,*
1
Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
2
Clemson Light Imaging Facility, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(10), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100416
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 20 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 2 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease: The Dawn of an Era with New Targets and Novel Therapies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cholesterol-laden macrophages are recognized as a major contributor to atherosclerosis. However, recent evidence indicates that vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) that accumulate cholesterol and transdifferentiate into a macrophage-like cell (MLC) phenotype also play a role in atherosclerosis. Therefore, removing cholesterol from MLC may be a potential atheroprotective strategy. The two transporters which remove cholesterol from cells are ABCA1 and ABCG1, as they efflux cholesterol to apoAI and HDL, respectively. In this study, the well-characterized immortalized VSMC line MOVAS cells were edited to generate ABCA1- and ABCG1-knockout (KO) MOVAS cell lines. We cholesterol-loaded ABCA1-KO MOVAS cells, ABCG1-KO MOVAS cells, and wild-type MOVAS cells to convert cells into a MLC phenotype. When we measured apoAI- and HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in these cells, we observed a drastic decrease in apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux within ABCA1-KO MOVAS MLC, but HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux was only partially reduced in ABCG1-KO MOVAS cells. Since SR-BI also participates in HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux, we assessed SR-BI protein expression in ABCG1-KO MOVAS MLC and observed SR-BI upregulation, which offered a possible mechanism explaining why HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux remains maintained in ABCG1-KO MOVAS MLC. When we used lentivirus for shRNA-mediated knockdown of SR-BI in ABCG1-KO MOVAS MLC, this decreased HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux when compared to ABCG1-KO MOVAS MLC with unmanipulated SR-BI expression. Taken together, these major findings suggest that SR-BI expression in MLC of a VSMC origin plays a compensatory role in HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux when ABCG1 expression becomes impaired and provides insight on SR-BI demonstrating anti-atherogenic properties within VSMC/MLC.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory condition caused by cholesterol accumulating in arteries [1,2]. While the accumulation of cholesterol can occur in arterial endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells during atherosclerosis, sub-endothelial macrophage cholesterol accumulation is recognized as the main driver of atherosclerosis [3,4,5,6]. Intimal lipid-laden macrophages are considered a hallmark of atherosclerosis [7,8] and so research has been focused on treatments that prevent or reverse cholesterol accumulating within intimal macrophages [9,10]. However, more recent data suggests most cholesterol-laden intimal cells are of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) origin [11,12]. The disagreement over VSMC versus macrophage intimal foam cell populations arises from the cholesterol accumulation in VSMC causing VSMC to transdifferentiate into a macrophage-like cell (MLC) [13,14]. Therefore, uncovering alternative therapies geared toward reducing cholesterol content within intimal VSMC/MLC, in light of the current knowledge, may be an appropriate approach for treating atherosclerosis.
The removal of cellular cholesterol is diverse among cell types, but two transporters which regulate cholesterol efflux in macrophages and other peripheral cells are the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and the ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) [15]. ABCA1 is crucial to reversing cholesterol transport because ABCA1 is required for apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux, which results in generating nascent HDL [16,17,18,19]. ABCG1 is also vital to reversing cholesterol transport by participating in HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux [20]. Both transporters are considered atheroprotective by contributing to reverse cholesterol transport and major cellular cholesterol efflux pathways [21,22]. There is a wealth of data to imply macrophage ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression is atheroprotective [23]. In comparison, published data is scant regarding whether VSMC ABCA1/ABCG1 expression is anti-atherogenic.
Scavenger receptor B1 (SR-BI) is capable of promoting cholesterol efflux to HDL particles [22]. Like ABCA1 and ABCG1, much of the published literature on SR-BI-mediated cholesterol efflux has focused on its expression in macrophages. Remarkably, SR-BI can participate in cholesterol influx [24,25], particularly within hepatocytes [22]. This dual-function of SR-BI makes it crucial for regulating whole-body cholesterol metabolism [25]. HDL binding to endothelial SR-BI is shown to stimulate atheroprotective nitric oxide [26,27]. However, endothelial cell SR-BI facilitates LDL transcytosis, which promotes atherogenesis [28]. Therefore, it is possible that SR-BI expression in vessel wall cells exhibits both atherogenic and atheroprotective properties, though it is poorly understood whether VSMC/MLC SR-BI expression is either atheroprotective or atherogenic.
The primary purpose of this work was to attempt to uncover the atheroprotective roles of ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in cultured VSMC. For our study, we utilized the well-characterized immortalized mouse aortic smooth muscle cell line MOVAS cells [29,30,31] for the generation of ABCA1 knockout (A1-KO) MOVAS cells, ABCG1 knockout (G1-KO) MOVAS cells, and ABCA1/ABCG1 double-knockout (DKO) MOVAS cells to compare to parental wild-type (WT) MOVAS cells. Using these cells, we tested the hypothesis that ABC transporter expression restores the VSMC phenotype in MLC by preserving apoAI/HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux. Interestingly, our results show HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux is still maintained in ABCG1-deficient MLC through SR-BI upregulation, which suggests that SR-BI plays a compensatory role in regulating HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in VSMC/MLC when ABCG1-dependent cholesterol efflux is impaired.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Maintenance of Cells

The immortalized vascular smooth muscle cell line MOVAS cells [29,31] were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Wild-type (WT) MOVAS cells were used to produce ABC transporter knockout (KO) MOVAS cells via CRISPR-Cas9 and gene editing was completed as a fee-for-service by the Genome Engineering & Stem Cell Center (GESC@MGI) at Washington University in Saint Louis [30]. To generate ABCA1 KO (A1-KO) MOVAS cells, a synthetic gRNA with the spacer sequence 5′-GAATGGGCAATTCGCAAACT was obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) and complexed with recombinant Cas9 protein acquired from the MacroLab at QB3-Berkeley before being nucleofected (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) into cells. To produce ABCG1 KO (G1-KO) MOVAS cells, the same strategy described above was utilized, with the synthetic gRNA spacer sequence used being 5′-TCATGGGTCCTTCTGGAGCT. Nucleofected MOVAS cells were subsequently single cell sorted into 96-well plates and single clones were screened via next-generation sequencing for harboring only out-of-frame indels within respective alleles. ABCA1/ABCG1 double KO (DKO) MOVAS cells were produced by knocking out ABCG1 from a clone of the A1-KO cells and parental WT MOVAS cells were used as control cells in our studies. All cells were cultured using standard growth medium [29] containing high-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Corning, New York, NY, USA) supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin (P/S; 1%; Corning), G418 (500 μg/mL; VWR Life Science, Radnor, PA, USA), and FBS Essence (10%; VWR Life Science). MOVAS were maintained in 10 cm tissue culture (TC) dishes and incubated at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Cells were rinsed with PBS and replenished with standard growth medium every 2–3 days until they were used for experimental studies. Prior to conducting these studies, cells reached a confluency of approximately 80% within each treatment plate.

2.2. Cellular Treatments

We used an established protocol to induce VSMC-to-MLC transdifferentiation in MOVAS cells [13,14]. Briefly, we cultured MOVAS cells in DMEM containing 1% P/S, 2 mg/mL of fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA-FAFA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 10 μg/mL of cholesterol–methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD:Chol; Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h to induce MLC transdifferentiation. We also treated a subset of MOVAS cells in similar conditions but without MβCD:Chol. To attempt to restore the VSMC phenotype in MOVAS MLC, we rinsed cells with PBS, then treated cells for 72 h using medium containing DMEM, 1% P/S, 2 mg/mL BSA-FAFA, and one of the following cholesterol acceptors: 100 μg/mL apoAI (Academy Bio-Medical Company, Houston, TX, USA); 100 μg/mL HDL (Academy Bio-Medical Company); or human serum (2.5%; Sigma-Aldrich). We also incubated a subset of MOVAS cells in similar conditions to those described above but replaced cholesterol acceptors with vehicle only. To manipulate SR-BI expression in MOVAS cells, we transduced cells with a lentiviral vector that expresses shRNA directed at SR-BI (VectorBuilder, Chicago, IL, USA). For the control group of MOVAS cells, we transduced cells with a lentiviral vector expressing a non-targeted scrambled shRNA (VectorBuilder). The multiplicity of infection (MOI) used for all experiments involving lentiviral transduction was 5. Cells were transduced for 24 h, rinsed with PBS, and then used for downstream experiments.

2.3. Immunoblotting

WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO MOVAS cells were cultured in 6-well TC plates. For experiments that assessed ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression, we exposed cells to the LXR agonist GW3965 (10 μM; Sigma-Aldrich) [32] for 24 h. The rationale for GW3965 treatment was to assess the possibility of any unedited cells still remaining in our KO cell populations which may be revealed by treating cells with GW3965, since this agonist robustly upregulates ABCA1/ABCG1 expression [32,33]. After GW3965 treatments, cells were rinsed with PBS, and harvested using RIPA lysis buffer and protease inhibitors (VWR Life Science) [34]. We quantified cellular protein using a BCA assay kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA) and an equal mass of protein for each sample was separated via SDS-PAGE, followed by PVDF membrane transfer (Merck Millipore Ltd., Burlington, MA, USA). After the protein transfer, we blocked PVDF membranes, and probed proteins of interest using the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-ABCA1 (1:1000 dilution, sc-58219; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA); rabbit anti-ABCG1 (1:5000 dilution, NB400-132; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA); mouse anti-SR-BI (1:2000 dilution, MABC730; Sigma Aldrich); mouse anti-GAPDH (1:1000 dilution, sc-365062; Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and mouse anti-HSP90 (1:5000 dilution, 610419; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). GAPDH and HSP90 were chosen as loading controls (i.e., housekeeping proteins) and selection of which representative probing result to use was based on attempting to prevent high background noise yet still detecting an optimal signal while limiting signal saturation [35]. After primary antibody incubation, we incubated PVDF membranes with one of the following secondary antibodies: HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:10,000 dilution, AP181P; Sigma-Aldrich); HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgM (1:10,000 dilution, SAB3701199; Sigma Aldrich); or HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution, HAF008; Novus Biologicals). Afterwards, we used ECL (Immobilon ECL Ultra Western HRP Substrate; MilliporeSigma, Billerica, MA, USA) to detect HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and imaging was performed with a ChemiDoc system (Analytik Jena US, Upland, CA, USA).

2.4. Cholesterol Efflux Assays

MOVAS cells were seeded into 48-well TC plates and treated using DMEM supplemented with BSA-FAFA (2 mg/mL), P/S (1%), [3H] cholesterol (1 μCi/mL; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and MβCD:Chol (10 μg/mL) [13,14], for 72 h. After treatments, we rinsed cells with PBS and replenished cells with DMEM:P/S:BSA-FAFA containing either vehicle only or one the following cholesterol acceptors: ApoAI (100 μg/mL); HDL (100 μg/mL); or human serum (2.5%). After treating MOVAS cells for 72 h, we filtered the conditioned medium to remove non-adherent cells. We also rinsed MOVAS cells with PBS and lysed cells using sodium hydroxide. We counted [3H] within the cellular extracts and conditioned medium using a PerkinElmer Tri-Carb 4910TR liquid scintillation counter and calculated apoAI-, HDL-, and serum-mediated cholesterol efflux as previously described [29].

2.5. RT-qPCR

We extracted total cellular RNA as previously described [29]. Briefly, cells were rinsed with PBS, and total RNA harvested via a Direct-Zol RNA purification kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). After total RNA isolation, we quantified total RNA with a SpectraMax® QuickDrop™ Micro-Volume Spectrophotometer (MolecularDevices, LLC., San Jose, CA, USA). We used 100 ng of total RNA per sample for cDNA synthesis by converting the RNA into cDNA using a Quantabio qScript® cDNA SuperMix kit (Beverly, MA, USA). We used the cDNA as template for qPCR along with a Quantabio PerfeCTa SYBR Green Fastmix kit for amplifying the following genes: ACTA2 (forward primer, 5′-GCTTCGCTGGTGATGATGCTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-AGTTGGTGATGATGCCGTGTTC-3′); CD68 (forward primer: 5′-CTTCCCACAGGCAGCACA-3′; reverse primer: 5′-ATGATGAGAGGCAGCAAGAGG-3′); and GAPDH housekeeping gene for normalization (forward primer: 5′-CGTGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC-3′; reverse primer: 5′-TGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTCG-3′). We quantified qPCR reactions using a qTOWER3 G touch qPCR machine (Analytik Jena US) and calculated gene expression levels using the delta-delta CT (ΔΔCT) method [36].

2.6. Cellular Imaging

We plated MOVAS cells in four-chamber TC slides (Corning) to be used for staining. MOVAS cell staining and imaging was conducted at the Clemson Light Imaging Facility (CLIF), as previously described [29]. Briefly, cells were incubated with mouse anti-ACTA2 (sc-32251; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and mouse anti-CD68 (sc-20060; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) primary antibodies, then incubated with Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies. We detected cell nuclei via staining with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cellular imaging was performed using a Leica SP8X MP Confocal System equipped with HyD detectors, a 405 nm laser, a tunable white light laser, and time gating capacity (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). To capture and export images of the stained MOVAS cells, Leica LAS-X software (Leica Microsystems Version 3.5.5.19976) was utilized.

2.7. Statistics

SigmaPlot (v14.0) software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. For all datasets, normality was determined using a Shapiro–Wilk test and equal variance was assessed by performing a Brown-Forsythe test. For statistical tests involving 2 groups, a Student’s t-test was performed if both normality and equal variance were assumed. We performed a Mann–Whitney rank sum test when normality was not assumed and a Welch’s t-test when equal variance was violated. For statistical tests involving >2 groups, a one-way ANOVA and Tukey test were performed when normality and equal variance were assumed, while we performed a Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks and Dunn’s test when equal variance was not assumed. When our studies required statistical analysis, we conducted three independent experiments with 3 biological replicates per experiment, with these data points being represented in our figures and group means denoted as bars. For all statistical tests, we set significance at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. HDL-Mediated Compensatory Cholesterol Efflux Occurs in ABCG1-Deficient MLC

Using immunoblotting, we assessed ABCA1/ABCG1 deletion in KO MOVAS cells. We also treated cells with the LXR agonist GW3965 which robustly induces ABCA1/ABCG1 expression [32,33]. The rationale for GW3965 treatment was to attempt to stimulate ABC transporter expression that may be obscured in KO cell populations under normal conditions if cell populations are contaminated with unedited cells that still express endogenous ABCA1/ABCG1. In treated MOVAS cells, we showed the effective ablation of ABC transporter expression in the respective ABCA1/ABCG1 deficient cells (Figure 1a,b). Since edited cells sometimes lose phenotypic properties [37], we analyzed whether ABC transporter-deficient MOVAS cells could still convert into MLC [29,30]. As anticipated, MOVAS KO cells do transdifferentiate into MLC, as determined by the reduced expression of the VSMC marker ACTA2 coinciding with the induced expression of the macrophage marker CD68 [29] (Figure 1c). We proceeded to measure apoAI-, HDL-, and serum-mediated cholesterol efflux in WT and KO MOVAS MLC. We detected a striking decrease in apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCA1-deficient MOVAS MLC (Figure 2a). This decrease in apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCA1-deficient MOVAS MLC was also associated with an impaired ability to restore VSMC phenotype upon exposure to apoAI, as determined by failing to restore normal expression of the VSMC marker ACTA2 and the failure to suppress the expression of the macrophage marker CD68 (Figure 2b). However, when we measured HDL- and serum-mediated cholesterol efflux in WT and MOVAS KO MLC (Figure 2c,d), the reduction in HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux observed in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC was not as striking when compared to the percent reduction observed in ABCA1-deficient MOVAS MLC for apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux. Thus, this result implies alternative mechanisms may contribute to HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux other than ABCG1.

3.2. SR-BI Protein Upregulation Occurs in ABCG1-Deficient MOVAS MLC

SR-BI can efflux cholesterol to HDL [22,25,38] and therefore may be a compensatory mechanism for VSMC/MLC to preserve HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux when ABCG1 expression is impaired. Hence, we assessed the SR-BI protein in WT and KO MOVAS cells that were either phenotypically normal (VSMC) or cholesterol-loaded to induce MLC transdifferentiation. Within the MOVAS-WT and MOVAS-A1KO cells, we observed no change in the SR-BI protein when comparing VSMC and MLC protein levels (Figure 3a,b). However, in ABCG1-deficient cells, we observed SR-BI upregulation in MLC when compared to VSMC (Figure 3c,d), potentially indicating that SR-BI is a possible facilitator for maintaining HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC that have impaired ABCG1 expression. To attempt to manipulate SR-BI expression in MOVAS-G1KO and MOVAS-DKO cells, we evaluated lentiviral transduction in these cells using GFP-expressing lentiviral vectors [39], and showed that lentivirus efficiently transduces these KO cell lines (Figure 3e,f). We then utilized lentivirus to knock down SR-BI in MOVAS-G1KO and MOVAS-DKO cells, which resulted in effective SR-BI protein downregulating (Figure 3g,h).

3.3. Inhibiting SR-BI in MOVAS-G1KO MLC Reduces HDL-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux and Halts VSMC Restoration

To assess whether SR-BI plays a role in maintaining HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC exhibiting impaired ABCG1-dependent cholesterol efflux, we measured HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MOVAS-G1KO MLC. To manipulate gene expression in these cells, we transduced MOVAS-G1KO MLC with a lentiviral vector that either expresses a non-targeting scrambled control shRNA or an shRNA that inhibits SR-BI expression. When SR-BI knockdown occurred in MOVAS-G1KO MLC, this decreased HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux when compared to control MOVAS-G1KO MLC (Figure 4a). When we measured mRNA expression of the classical VSMC marker ACTA2 and classical macrophage marker CD68 [29,30] within these groups of cells, we observed that inhibiting SR-BI in MOVAS-G1KO MLC prevents these cells from converting back to their original VSMC phenotype when exposed to HDL (Figure 4b,c). Therefore, these results suggest that inhibiting SR-BI in MLC attenuates HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux which halts VSMC restoration when ABCG1 expression is impaired in these cells.

3.4. Knockdown of SR-BI in MOVAS-DKO MLC Prevents VSMC Restoration via Decreasing Serum-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux

Serum is an endogenous cholesterol acceptor considered more physiologically relevant for measuring cholesterol efflux [24,40] compared to purified apoAI and HDL. However, since serum is abundant in apoAI and HDL [40,41], we measured serum-mediated cholesterol efflux in MOVAS-DKO MLC only to eliminate the possibility of ABCA1/apoAI-dependent cholesterol efflux potentially impacting our results when manipulating SR-BI expression. We observed a significant decrease in serum-mediated cholesterol efflux when knocking down SR-BI in MOVAS-DKO MLC when compared to control MOVAS-DKO MLC (Figure 5a). This reduction in serum-mediated cholesterol efflux hampered these cells’ ability to revert back to their VSMC phenotype (Figure 5b,c). Thus, these findings imply impaired ABC transporter and SR-BI expression in MLC prevent these cells from converting back to their VSMC phenotype, even upon exposure to normal (i.e., serum incubation) physiological conditions.

4. Discussion

In this study, we explored the impact of ABC transporter expression on the regulation of cholesterol efflux in MLC. As anticipated, we observed negligible apoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCA1-deficient MLC. However, while we also expected negligible HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCG1-deficient MLC, we instead detected reductions that were not as pronounced as we originally anticipated, which led us to investigate other mechanisms responsible for HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC with impaired ABCG1-dependent cholesterol efflux. In ABCG1-deficient MLC, we observed the upregulation of SR-BI, which indicated a possible mechanism for preserving HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCG1-deficient MLC. When we inhibited SR-BI in ABCG1-deficient MLC, this decreased HDL- and (HDL-rich) serum-mediated cholesterol efflux, which hindered these cells in reverting to their VSMC phenotype. Taken together, these results suggest impaired ABCA1, but not ABCG1, in MLC negatively impacts cholesterol efflux capacity, as SR-BI preserves HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux when ABCG1-dependent cholesterol efflux is impaired.
Emerging evidence indicates VSMC are a major cell type that influences atherosclerosis development [42,43]. Furthermore, cholesterol accumulation in VSMC induces MLC transdifferentiation, which plays a pivotal role in atherosclerosis progression [44,45]. Therefore, strategies to increase cholesterol removal in MLC may be a potential therapy for atherosclerosis. Since ABCA1 and ABCG1 are two transporters primarily responsible for removing excess cholesterol in peripheral cells [46], upregulating the expression of these two transporters in VSMC/MLC may be a promising atheroprotective approach. Research has shown that MLC of VSMC origin have decreased ABCA1 expression [11,12,47], though there has been little focus on assessing the atherogenic impact of ABCG1 expression in VSMC/MLC [48]. This is the only study, to the authors’ knowledge, that has directly tested the impact of ABCG1 deficiency on cholesterol efflux in cultured MLC. This work uncovered the fact that ABCG1 deletion in MLC does not entirely diminish the ability of these cells to efflux cholesterol to HDL, as we discovered SR-BI induction in MLC compensates for the lack of ABCG1 to preserve HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux. From this observation, we infer that at least in VSMC/MLC, SR-BI plays more than a minor supportive role in total cholesterol efflux when ABCG1 expression becomes impaired.
Within this report, we want to highlight some limitations of our study. One drawback is the use of immortalized cells instead of primary cells, as data generated from using immortalized cells is not considered as physiologically relevant in comparison to primary cells [49]. Since ABCA1 and ABCG1 floxed mice are commercially available [50], future studies should involve utilizing Cre-Lox technology and ex vivo strategies [51] to test whether our findings can be reproduced when primary VSMC are used. Another drawback to our experiments is that we did not attempt to identify the precise mechanism(s) underlying what induces SR-BI protein expression in MLC that exhibit impaired ABCG1. Discovering what controls this process may lead to therapies geared at robustly increasing SR-BI expression in VSMC/MLC and other cell types, which may eventually be used as a form of treatment for atherosclerosis. Lastly, we did not manipulate SR-BI expression in VSMC/MLC that demonstrated native ABCG1 expression, as it would be interesting to test if deletion of SR-BI in MLC results in upregulation of endogenous ABCG1 to compensate for defective SR-BI expression. Thus, future studies should analyze whether HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC is negatively impacted by impaired SR-BI or if ABCG1 expression is induced to compensate for a loss of SR-BI-dependent cholesterol efflux.
In conclusion, our results depict SR-BI preserving HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC when ABCG1 expression is hampered (Figure 6). Future studies should be devoted to testing if ABCG1 deletion within the VSMC of atherogenic mouse models results in exacerbating atherosclerosis. If results show that atherosclerotic lesion size and lipid content does not change from VSMC ABCG1 deficiency in vivo, then VSMC SR-BI expression/function should be assessed to deduce whether SR-BI induction in VSMC arising from VSMC ABCG1 deletion confers protection against atherosclerosis progression by preserving VSMC/MLC HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.; methodology, O.O. and A.S.; formal analysis, O.O. and A.S.; investigation, O.O., I.C.E., R.R.P., T.B. and A.S.; resources, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, O.O. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, O.O. and A.S.; supervision, T.B. and A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by an American Heart Association (AHA) grant, Institutional Research Enhancement Award 20AIREA35120024. Imaging analyses were conducted at the Clemson Light Imaging Facility (CLIF) which is supported in part by the NIH Eukaryotic Pathogens Innovation Center (EPIC) Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) grant P20GM146584, NIH SC BioCRAFT COBRE grant 5P30GM131959, and Clemson University Division of Research. The Leica SP8X confocal microscope system housed in the CLIF is partially supported by the NSF MRI grants 1126407 and 1920095.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data within this study are provided in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Maseri, A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002, 105, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Libby, P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002, 420, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moore, K.J.; Tabas, I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell 2011, 145, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tabas, I. Macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: Consequences on plaque progression and the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2333–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tabas, I.; Bornfeldt, K.E. Macrophage Phenotype and Function in Different Stages of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 653–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tabas, I.; Garcia-Cardena, G.; Owens, G.K. Recent insights into the cellular biology of atherosclerosis. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 209, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moore, K.J.; Sheedy, F.J.; Fisher, E.A. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: A dynamic balance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barrett, T.J. Macrophages in Atherosclerosis Regression. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bobryshev, Y.V.; Ivanova, E.A.; Chistiakov, D.A.; Nikiforov, N.G.; Orekhov, A.N. Macrophages and Their Role in Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology and Transcriptome Analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 9582430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, R.; Ji, H.; Jin, L.; Lin, S.; Huang, Y.; Xu, K.; Yang, Q.; Sun, D.; Wu, W. Macrophage-Based Therapies for Atherosclerosis Management. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 8131754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Dubland, J.A.; Allahverdian, S.; Asonye, E.; Sahin, B.; Jaw, J.E.; Sin, D.D.; Seidman, M.A.; Leeper, N.J.; Francis, G.A. Smooth Muscle Cells Contribute the Majority of Foam Cells in ApoE (Apolipoprotein E)-Deficient Mouse Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 876–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Allahverdian, S.; Chehroudi, A.C.; McManus, B.M.; Abraham, T.; Francis, G.A. Contribution of intimal smooth muscle cells to cholesterol accumulation and macrophage-like cells in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 2014, 129, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vengrenyuk, Y.; Nishi, H.; Long, X.; Ouimet, M.; Savji, N.; Martinez, F.O.; Cassella, C.P.; Moore, K.J.; Ramsey, S.A.; Miano, J.M.; et al. Cholesterol loading reprograms the microRNA-143/145-myocardin axis to convert aortic smooth muscle cells to a dysfunctional macrophage-like phenotype. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rong, J.X.; Shapiro, M.; Trogan, E.; Fisher, E.A. Transdifferentiation of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells to a macrophage-like state after cholesterol loading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13531–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yvan-Charvet, L.; Wang, N.; Tall, A.R. Role of HDL, ABCA1, and ABCG1 transporters in cholesterol efflux and immune responses. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Oram, J.F. Molecular basis of cholesterol homeostasis: Lessons from Tangier disease and ABCA1. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oram, J.F.; Heinecke, J.W. ATP-binding cassette transporter A1: A cell cholesterol exporter that protects against cardiovascular disease. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85, 1343–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oram, J.F.; Lawn, R.M. ABCA1. The gatekeeper for eliminating excess tissue cholesterol. J. Lipid Res. 2001, 42, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oram, J.F.; Vaughan, A.M. ABCA1-mediated transport of cellular cholesterol and phospholipids to HDL apolipoproteins. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2000, 11, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cavelier, C.; Lorenzi, I.; Rohrer, L.; von Eckardstein, A. Lipid efflux by the ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1761, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Favari, E.; Chroni, A.; Tietge, U.J.; Zanotti, I.; Escola-Gil, J.C.; Bernini, F. Cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2015, 224, 181–206. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Phillips, M.C. Molecular mechanisms of cellular cholesterol efflux. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 24020–24029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, N.; Westerterp, M. ABC Transporters, Cholesterol Efflux, and Implications for Cardiovascular Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1276, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. White-Gilbertson, S.; Lu, P.; Esobi, I.; Echesabal-Chen, J.; Mulholland, P.J.; Gooz, M.; Ogretmen, B.; Stamatikos, A.; Voelkel-Johnson, C. Polyploid giant cancer cells are dependent on cholesterol for progeny formation through amitotic division. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shen, W.J.; Azhar, S.; Kraemer, F.B. SR-B1: A Unique Multifunctional Receptor for Cholesterol Influx and Efflux. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2018, 80, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mineo, C.; Shaul, P.W. HDL stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: A novel mechanism of HDL action. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2003, 13, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuhanna, I.S.; Zhu, Y.; Cox, B.E.; Hahner, L.D.; Osborne-Lawrence, S.; Lu, P.; Marcel, Y.L.; Anderson, R.G.; Mendelsohn, M.E.; Hobbs, H.H.; et al. High-density lipoprotein binding to scavenger receptor-BI activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, L.; Chambliss, K.L.; Gao, X.; Yuhanna, I.S.; Behling-Kelly, E.; Bergaya, S.; Ahmed, M.; Michaely, P.; Luby-Phelps, K.; Darehshouri, A.; et al. SR-B1 drives endothelial cell LDL transcytosis via DOCK4 to promote atherosclerosis. Nature 2019, 569, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Esobi, I.C.; Barksdale, C.; Heard-Tate, C.; Reigers Powell, R.; Bruce, T.F.; Stamatikos, A. MOVAS Cells: A Versatile Cell Line for Studying Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Cholesterol Metabolism. Lipids 2021, 56, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Esobi, I.C.; Oladosu, O.; Echesabal-Chen, J.; Powell, R.R.; Bruce, T.; Stamatikos, A. miR-33a Expression Attenuates ABCA1-Dependent Cholesterol Efflux and Promotes Macrophage-Like Cell Transdifferentiation in Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. J. Lipids 2023, 2023, 8241899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Afroze, T.; Husain, M. c-Myb-binding sites mediate G(1)/S-associated repression of the plasma membrane Ca(2+)-ATPase-1 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 9062–9069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huang, K.; Jo, H.; Echesabal-Chen, J.; Stamatikos, A. Combined LXR and RXR Agonist Therapy Increases ABCA1 Protein Expression and Enhances ApoAI-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux in Cultured Endothelial Cells. Metabolites 2021, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tarling, E.J.; Edwards, P.A. ATP binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) is an intracellular sterol transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19719–19724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Esobi, I.; Olanrewaju, O.; Echesabal-Chen, J.; Stamatikos, A. Utilizing the LoxP-Stop-LoxP System to Control Transgenic ABC-Transporter Expression In Vitro. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghosh, R.; Gilda, J.E.; Gomes, A.V. The necessity of and strategies for improving confidence in the accuracy of western blots. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2014, 11, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, X.; Tasca, F.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Janssen, J.M.; Brescia, M.D.; Bellin, M.; Szuhai, K.; Kenrick, J.; Frock, R.L.; et al. Expanding the editable genome and CRISPR-Cas9 versatility using DNA cutting-free gene targeting based on in trans paired nicking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 974–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Linton, M.F.; Tao, H.; Linton, E.F.; Yancey, P.G. SR-BI: A Multifunctional Receptor in Cholesterol Homeostasis and Atherosclerosis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bi, L.; Wacker, B.K.; Stamatikos, A.; Sethuraman, M.; Komandur, K.; Dichek, D.A. Jugular Vein Injection of High-Titer Lentiviral Vectors Does Not Transduce the Aorta-Brief Report. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021, 41, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Low, H.; Hoang, A.; Sviridov, D. Cholesterol efflux assay. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, e3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Borresen, A.L.; Berg, K. Presence of “free” apoA-I in serum: Implications for immunological quantification of HDL and its apoproteins. Artery 1980, 7, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Bennett, M.R.; Sinha, S.; Owens, G.K. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dubland, J.A.; Francis, G.A. So Much Cholesterol: The unrecognized importance of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic foam cell formation. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2016, 27, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gomez, D.; Owens, G.K. Smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 95, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Allahverdian, S.; Chaabane, C.; Boukais, K.; Francis, G.A.; Bochaton-Piallat, M.L. Smooth muscle cell fate and plasticity in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Frambach, S.; de Haas, R.; Smeitink, J.A.M.; Rongen, G.A.; Russel, F.G.M.; Schirris, T.J.J. Brothers in Arms: ABCA1- and ABCG1-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux as Promising Targets in Cardiovascular Disease Treatment. Pharmacol. Rev. 2020, 72, 152–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Choi, H.Y.; Rahmani, M.; Wong, B.W.; Allahverdian, S.; McManus, B.M.; Pickering, J.G.; Chan, T.; Francis, G.A. ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 expression and apolipoprotein A-I binding are impaired in intima-type arterial smooth muscle cells. Circulation 2009, 119, 3223–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Allahverdian, S.; Pannu, P.S.; Francis, G.A. Contribution of monocyte-derived macrophages and smooth muscle cells to arterial foam cell formation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 95, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kaur, G.; Dufour, J.M. Cell lines: Valuable tools or useless artifacts. Spermatogenesis 2012, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Westerterp, M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Tattersall, I.W.; Fotakis, P.; Bochem, A.E.; Molusky, M.M.; Ntonga, V.; Abramowicz, S.; Parks, J.S.; Welch, C.L.; et al. Deficiency of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters A1 and G1 in Endothelial Cells Accelerates Atherosclerosis in Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 1328–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, J.H.; Wei, H.; Jaffe, M.; Airhart, N.; Du, L.; Angelov, S.N.; Yan, J.; Allen, J.K.; Kang, I.; Wight, T.N.; et al. Postnatal Deletion of the Type II Transforming Growth Factor-beta Receptor in Smooth Muscle Cells Causes Severe Aortopathy in Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 2647–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcdd 10 00416 g001
Figure 1. Characterizing ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS cells. (a,b) MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), or ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) cells were treated with GW3965 to attempt induction of ABCA1 and ABCG1 protein expression. Post GW3965 exposure, lysates were used for immunoblotting to probe for ABCA1, ABCG1, or housekeeping proteins (GAPDH and HSP90). (c) WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO MOVAS cells were either incubated with vehicle only or exposed to MβCD:Chol (Chol) to trigger MLC transdifferentiation. Post treatments, cells were stained ACTA2 (red), CD68 (green), and DAPI (blue; cell nuclei) to assess VSMC-to-MLC transdifferentiation. (a,b) Size markers shown in kDa.
Figure 1. Characterizing ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS cells. (a,b) MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), or ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) cells were treated with GW3965 to attempt induction of ABCA1 and ABCG1 protein expression. Post GW3965 exposure, lysates were used for immunoblotting to probe for ABCA1, ABCG1, or housekeeping proteins (GAPDH and HSP90). (c) WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO MOVAS cells were either incubated with vehicle only or exposed to MβCD:Chol (Chol) to trigger MLC transdifferentiation. Post treatments, cells were stained ACTA2 (red), CD68 (green), and DAPI (blue; cell nuclei) to assess VSMC-to-MLC transdifferentiation. (a,b) Size markers shown in kDa.
Jcdd 10 00416 g001
Jcdd 10 00416 g002
Figure 2. Impact of ABC transporter deletion in MLC of VSMC origin when exposed to cholesterol acceptors. (a) ApoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux measured in MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), or ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) MLC. (b) ACTA2 and CD68 mRNA expression measured in MOVAS WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO loaded with MβCD:Chol and then treated with either vehicle only or incubated with apoAI. (c,d) Cholesterol efflux measured in MOVAS WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO MLC treated with either HDL (c) or serum (d). (b) AU, arbitrary units. (a,d) The symbol (*) indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Impact of ABC transporter deletion in MLC of VSMC origin when exposed to cholesterol acceptors. (a) ApoAI-mediated cholesterol efflux measured in MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), or ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) MLC. (b) ACTA2 and CD68 mRNA expression measured in MOVAS WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO loaded with MβCD:Chol and then treated with either vehicle only or incubated with apoAI. (c,d) Cholesterol efflux measured in MOVAS WT, A1-KO, G1-KO, and DKO MLC treated with either HDL (c) or serum (d). (b) AU, arbitrary units. (a,d) The symbol (*) indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Jcdd 10 00416 g002
Jcdd 10 00416 g003
Figure 3. SR-BI induction in MOVAS MLC with ABCG1 deletion. (a–d) SR-BI protein and GAPDH loading control analyzed via immunoblotting in MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), and ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) treated with vehicle (Veh) only or loaded with MβCD:Chol (Chol) to trigger MLC transdifferentiation. (e,f) Transduction efficiency assessed via fluorescent microscopy in G1-KO (e) and DKO (f) MOVAS cells transduced with a GFP-expressing lentiviral vector. (g,h) SR-BI downregulation detected via immunoblotting in G1-KO (g) and DKO (h) MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing an SR-BI inhibitory shRNA (Inh) when compared to MOVAS MLC transduced with lentivirus expressing a non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (a–d,g,h) Size markers are kDa.
Figure 3. SR-BI induction in MOVAS MLC with ABCG1 deletion. (a–d) SR-BI protein and GAPDH loading control analyzed via immunoblotting in MOVAS wild-type (WT), ABCA1 KO (A1-KO), ABCG1 KO (G1-KO), and ABCA1/ABCG1-double KO (DKO) treated with vehicle (Veh) only or loaded with MβCD:Chol (Chol) to trigger MLC transdifferentiation. (e,f) Transduction efficiency assessed via fluorescent microscopy in G1-KO (e) and DKO (f) MOVAS cells transduced with a GFP-expressing lentiviral vector. (g,h) SR-BI downregulation detected via immunoblotting in G1-KO (g) and DKO (h) MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing an SR-BI inhibitory shRNA (Inh) when compared to MOVAS MLC transduced with lentivirus expressing a non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (a–d,g,h) Size markers are kDa.
Jcdd 10 00416 g003
Jcdd 10 00416 g004
Figure 4. Attenuation of HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux via SR-BI knockdown delays restoring VSMC phenotype in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC. (a) HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux measured in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentivirus either expressing an shRNA directed at SR-BI (Inh) or a non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (b,c) Gene expression of ACTA2 (b) and CD68 (c) measured in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS-MLC transduced with either Scr or Inh and exposed to HDL to promote cholesterol efflux. AU, arbitrary units.
Figure 4. Attenuation of HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux via SR-BI knockdown delays restoring VSMC phenotype in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC. (a) HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux measured in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentivirus either expressing an shRNA directed at SR-BI (Inh) or a non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (b,c) Gene expression of ACTA2 (b) and CD68 (c) measured in ABCG1-deficient MOVAS-MLC transduced with either Scr or Inh and exposed to HDL to promote cholesterol efflux. AU, arbitrary units.
Jcdd 10 00416 g004
Jcdd 10 00416 g005
Figure 5. Inhibiting SR-BI in serum-incubated ABCA1/ABCG1 double deficient MOVAS MLC retards VSMC restoration by reducing cholesterol efflux. (a) Measuring serum-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing either an shRNA targeting SR-BI (Inh) or non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (b,c) Expression of ACTA2 (b) and CD68 (c) mRNA measured in ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS-MLC exposed to serum and transduced with Scr versus Inh. AU, arbitrary units.
Figure 5. Inhibiting SR-BI in serum-incubated ABCA1/ABCG1 double deficient MOVAS MLC retards VSMC restoration by reducing cholesterol efflux. (a) Measuring serum-mediated cholesterol efflux in ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS MLC transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing either an shRNA targeting SR-BI (Inh) or non-targeting scrambled control shRNA (Scr). (b,c) Expression of ACTA2 (b) and CD68 (c) mRNA measured in ABCA1/ABCG1-deficient MOVAS-MLC exposed to serum and transduced with Scr versus Inh. AU, arbitrary units.
Jcdd 10 00416 g005
Jcdd 10 00416 g006
Figure 6. Proposed working model depicting SR-BI upregulation maintaining HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC of VSMC origin when ABCG1 expression becomes impaired.
Figure 6. Proposed working model depicting SR-BI upregulation maintaining HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux in MLC of VSMC origin when ABCG1 expression becomes impaired.
Jcdd 10 00416 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oladosu, O.; Esobi, I.C.; Powell, R.R.; Bruce, T.; Stamatikos, A. Dissecting the Impact of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell ABCA1 versus ABCG1 Expression on Cholesterol Efflux and Macrophage-like Cell Transdifferentiation: The Role of SR-BI. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100416

AMA Style

Oladosu O, Esobi IC, Powell RR, Bruce T, Stamatikos A. Dissecting the Impact of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell ABCA1 versus ABCG1 Expression on Cholesterol Efflux and Macrophage-like Cell Transdifferentiation: The Role of SR-BI. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2023; 10(10):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oladosu, Olanrewaju, Ikechukwu C. Esobi, Rhonda R. Powell, Terri Bruce, and Alexis Stamatikos. 2023. "Dissecting the Impact of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell ABCA1 versus ABCG1 Expression on Cholesterol Efflux and Macrophage-like Cell Transdifferentiation: The Role of SR-BI" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 10, no. 10: 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop