Next Article in Journal
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in Horses: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Immunogenicity Characterization of the Recombinant gI Protein Fragment from Pseudorabies Virus and an Evaluation of Its Diagnostic Use in Pigs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/vetsci10080508
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Canine Leptospirosis Clinical Case Due to Leptospira interrogans (Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) in a Dog Kennel in Castelvetrano (Western Sicily, South Italy)

by
Francesca Grippi
1,†,
Valeria Blanda
1,*,†,
Paola Galluzzo
1,*,
Manuel Bongiorno
2,
Carmela Sciacca
1,
Francesca Arcuri
1,
Rosalia D’Agostino
1,
Ilenia Giacchino
1,
Francesca Gucciardi
1,
Mario D’Incau
3,
Cristina Bertasio
3,
Alessandra Torina
1 and
Annalisa Guercio
1
1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Via Gino Marinuzzi 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Prevenzione Veterinaria-Area di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria, Unità Operativa Territoriale Alcamo Castelvetrano, Via Sardegna, 91022 Castelvetrano, Italy
3
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, 25124 Brescia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(8), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080508
Submission received: 7 July 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 3 August 2023 / Published: 6 August 2023
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by Leptospira, helical-shaped pathogenic spirochetes. Leptospira can affect both domestic and wild animals and humans, with clinical manifestations ranging from severe conditions to mild feverish symptoms or asymptomatic conditions. Leptospirosis is an occupational disease often overlooked in humans, possibly due to underdiagnosis, particularly in the absence of specific clinical signs. Its transmission can occur by direct contact with contaminated urine or organs. Dogs are reservoirs of pathogenic Leptospira, in particular L. interrogans serogroup Canicola, capable of infecting humans and other mammals. We report a case of acute leptospirosis in a puppy dog housed in a municipal kennel and the subsequent diagnostic investigations carried out on all the dogs housed in the kennel. The puppy tested positive for Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae in both serological and molecular tests. All of the other 66 dogs in the kennel underwent clinical and laboratory tests twice, 15 days apart. At the first sampling, eight dogs (12%) showed antibodies against Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni and in one of them Leptospira spp. DNA was detected. Dogs, and kennel dogs in particular, are sentinels for many zoonotic diseases, likely due to high population densities, stress, and exposure to rodents and other disease vectors.

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a worldwide widespread zoonosis caused by Leptospira genus. We report an acute leptospirosis case in a puppy housed at a municipal kennel and the subsequent diagnostic investigations carried out on all dogs housed in the kennel. Laboratory investigation included mainly a microagglutination test, real-time PCR, and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) for Leptospira genus. Other agents of infection were excluded. The puppy resulted positive for Leptospira interrogans Icterohaemorrhagiae both with serological and molecular assays. All of the other 66 dogs in the kennel underwent clinical and laboratory investigations twice, 15 days apart. No other dog showed leptospirosis clinical signs. At the first sampling, eight dogs (12%) showed antibodies against Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni. Real-time PCR on urine samples of seropositive dogs detected Leptospira spp. DNA in one sample, then identified as Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae by MLST. Fifteen days after, four of the previous seropositive dogs still showed antibodies against Leptospira spp. All urine samples collected from seropositive dogs were negative at real-time PCR. The study allowed the early confirmation of a Leptospirosis case and the identification of at least one asymptomatic carrier of pathogenic Leptospira spp. The prompt activation of all appropriate management measures allowed limiting and extinguishing the infection.

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis spread worldwide [1,2] caused by the Leptospira genus (family Leptospiraceae, order Spirochaetales), pathogenic helical shaped spirochetes. Several species of both domestic and wild animals, as well as humans [3,4,5,6,7,8,9], can be affected by Leptospira. Clinical manifestations ranging from severe conditions to mild febrile symptoms or even asymptomatic conditions can be observed [10,11]. Its transmission may occur via direct contact with contaminated urine or organs, due to the bacterium ability of colonizing kidneys after the bacteraemic phase and being released in the urine [12], or indirectly through exposure to contaminated environments [13]. Environmental factors, such as high pluviometric precipitation rates, flooding, natural disasters, uncontrolled urban expansion, and poor sanitation, have a significant role in influencing its transmission [10,14]. Human leptospirosis is considered a neglected infectious disease worldwide, probably due to the failure in leptospirosis diagnosis, in particular in the absence of specific clinical signs [15,16,17]. Leptospirosis is considered an occupational disease for several worker categories [18,19,20] and, in the last few years, leptospirosis transmission due to recreational activities has emerged [18].
Dogs are reservoirs for pathogenic Leptospira [10,21], especially L. interrogans serogroup Canicola, able to infect humans and other mammals [22]. Infected dogs may show serious clinical outcomes, with acute hepatorenal failure, or also be asymptomatic chronic carriers [23,24]. The last ones are of public health concern as they may spread the infection. Kennel dogs, in particular, are sentinels for many zoonotic diseases, likely due to high population density, stress, and exposure to rodents and other vectors of diseases [25]. In Italy, a national serological surveillance of Leptospirosis carried out on 3028 dogs in the years 2010–2011 detected a positive reaction in 29.9% of the animals. Serovars Bratislava (serogroup Australis), Copenhageni (serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae), Icterohaemorrhagiae (serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) and Canicola (serogroup Canicola) were the most frequently detected [26]. In particular, leptospiral infection was more common in dogs housed in kennels, with serological prevalence values ranging from 13.8% up to 49.2%, and strictly correlated with the hygienic conditions in the kennel [27].
According to the Italian Legislation, leptospirosis is ranked among the infectious and diffusive diseases and any confirmed or suspected case needs to be reported (Veterinary Police Regulation, articles n. 1, 2, and 10 of the Italian Presidential Decree n. 320, 8 February 1954). Appropriate control measures include the closure of the kennel and the isolation of the infected animals. Kennel closure is solved only with the clinical recovery following an adequate antibiotic therapy (Italian Ministerial Ordinance, 4 September 1985, article n. 6, specifically addressed to dogs and horses).
In this manuscript we describe the diagnostic path followed in order to detect the Leptospira presence and spread in a Sicilian municipal dog kennel (South Italy). The diagnostic process involved two phases: (i) the diagnosis of pathogenic Leptospira in a puppy dog that later died; (ii) the infection monitoring in the other dogs living in the kennel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Kennel

The kennel where the clinical case occurred is located in a countryside area in Castelvetrano, in Trapani province (Western Sicily, South Italy). A water purifier in the surrounding area was identified as a possible contributing factor for Leptospira spp. spreading. Moreover, evidence of rodent activity had been reported over time, and periodic rodent disinfections were carried out at the kennel. The kennel housed sixty-seven dogs, which underwent a medical examination at the time of entry into the kennel. As regards the vaccination status of the animals against Leptospira spp., all the dogs at the shelter were not vaccinated or vaccinated more than one year before with commercial tetravalent vaccine Nobivac L4 including L. interrogans serogroup Canicola, L interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae, L. interrogans serogroup Australis, and L. kirscheri serogrop Grippotyphosa. No booster shots had been carried out with the recommended regularity. Table 1 shows the historical details of the vaccination status of all 67 dogs at the time of the clinical case occurring. These dogs were divided according to their vaccination status into three groups: Group A, with dogs never vaccinated, including the deceased puppy, Group B, including dogs whose vaccination was carried out between 1 and 2 years ago, and Group C, with animals vaccinated more than two years ago.

2.2. Samples

2.2.1. Suspected Clinical Case

On the day of the onset of symptoms (T0), blood samples from the sick puppy were withdrawn and blood cells were separated from serum by centrifugation and stored at +4 °C until processing. At the same time, a urine sample was collected by cystocentesis and stored at +4 °C until the analysis. Following the animal’s death, an anatomopathological examination was carried out and a fragment of the kidney was collected and stored at +4 °C for immediate molecular analysis.

2.2.2. Sampling from the Other Dogs Housed in the Kennel

At T0, blood samples were withdrawn from all of the other sixty-six dogs in the kennel, and blood cells were separated from serum by centrifugation. All the dogs were subjected to a second blood sampling 15 days after (T1). Serum samples were stored at +4 °C until analysis. Urine samples were collected by cystocentesis from seropositive dogs 4 days after T0 (T0 + 4d) and at T1 and stored at +4 °C until the analysis.

2.3. Sample Processing and DNA Extraction

The kidney surface was flamed and 1 g of tissue was withdrawn and homogenized in 9 mL of sterile physiological solution with a Stomacher® 80 Biomaster (Seward Limited, London, UK) in order to perform DNA extraction. Two milliliters of urines were centrifuged at the rate of 12,000× g for 30 min, and the pellet was resuspended with 0.2 mL of ultrapure distilled water.
DNA was extracted from 0.2 mL of whole blood, homogenized kidney, or a resuspended pellet from urine using the Purelink Genomic DNA Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Rome, Italy) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, the extraction internal control (IC) included in the Quantifast Pathogen + IC Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used.

2.4. Differential Diagnosis

Real-time PCRs were carried out on the DNA extracted from the kidney fragment of the sick dog to detect DNA from Chlamydia spp. [28], Neospora caninum [29], Coxiella burnetii [30], Borrelia burgdorferi [31,32], and Toxoplasma gondii [33]. A nested PCR for T. gondii was also performed [34]. Regarding viral etiologic agents, conventional PCRs were carried out to detect Adenovirus [35] and Parvovirus [36,37] DNA.

2.5. Serological Test for Leptospirosis

Antibodies against Leptospira spp. were detected by a microagglutination test (MAT) in serum samples [38]. The MAT was performed according to the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) guidelines [39]. Cultured Leptospira spp. strains belonging to each of the eight pathogenic serogroups circulating in Italy were used in the test for sample agglutination, while specific Leptospira spp. rat antisera, provided by the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands), were used as positive controls. The following serovars were used as antigens: L. interrogans serogroup Australis, serovar Bratislava, strain Riccio 2; L. borgpeterseni, serogroup Ballum, serovar Ballum strain Mus 127; L. interrogans, serogroup Canicola, serovar Canicola, strain Alarik; L. kirschneri, serogroup Grippotyphosa, serovar Gryppotyphosa strain Duyster; L. interrogans, serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae, serovar Copenhageni, strain Wjinberg; L. interrogans, serogroup Pomona, serovar Pomona, strain Pomona; L. interrogans, serogroup Sejroe, serovar Hardjo, strain Hardjoprajitno; and L. borgpeterseni, serogroup Tarassovi, serovar Tarassovi, strain Mitis Johnson.
Each antigen was supplied by the National Centre for Leptospirosis IZS of Lombardia and Emilia Romagna “Bruno Ubertini” (IZSLER, Brescia, Italy) or by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers. They were maintained in Leptospira Medium Base Ellinghausen–MacCullough–Johnson–Harris (EMJH—Difco, Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Sparks, MD, USA), subcultured every 7–10 days, and checked for purity, mobility, and agglutination power before use [38,40]. A MAT cut-off of 1:100 identified the serological positive samples. Two-fold serial dilutions from 1:100 up to 1:6400 were performed in order to evaluate the titer of positive sera. If a simultaneous reaction with different serogroups/serovars was observed, the strain determining the highest titer is reported in this study as the agent responsible for the serological positivity. If no differences were observed in titers, each of the serogroups/serovars could be responsible for the serological positivity.

2.6. Molecular Tests for Leptospirosis

A real-time PCR targeting the lipL32 gene, which encodes an outer membrane protein present solely in the pathogenic species [41], was performed. DNA extracted from cultured Leptospira interrogans serogroup Australis serovar Bratislava was used as a positive control. The reaction was carried out in a CFX96 real-time system (Biorad, Segrate, Italy), applying a previously reported thermal profile [42].

2.7. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST)

In order to genotype the strain of Leptospira present in the samples, MLST assay was carried out on DNA from the dog samples that showed positive results in the real-time PCR. The MLST was carried out by the Italian National Reference Centre for Leptospirosis, at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna, Brescia (Italy) [43,44,45,46]. Seven housekeeping genes were sequenced: glmU, pntA, sucA, tpiA, pfkB, mreA, and caiB, based on scheme 1 proposed by Boonsilp in 2013 [44,47]. Nucleotide sequences were assembled using the SeqMan module of the Lasergene sequencing analysis software package (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA) or using Bionumerics software ver. 7.6 (Applied Math, Biomerieux, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). For allelic number and ST identification, assembled and trimmed sequences were queried against the Bacterial Isolate Genome Sequence Database (BIGSdb) (available online: https://pubmlst.org/Leptospira/, accessed on 15 May 2022). A phylogenetic analysis was conducted on the concatemers of the seven MLST genes using MEGA X [48], by comparing the sequences obtained in this study and some reference sequences downloaded from BIGSdb that were related to the most common STs found in Italy.

2.8. Prevention Measures at the Kennel

Following the confirmation of leptospirosis in the clinical case, the kennel was temporarily closed, and a microchip was inserted in all the dogs. Both the incoming and outgoing movements of the animals were temporarily blocked, as well as the dog walking time. Immediate and extraordinary disinfection and rodent infestation control of all the boxes and surrounding areas were carried out. Appropriate communications were addressed to all the people working with dogs, in order to let them know about their sanitary conditions and to instruct them on the preventive measures to be taken and the use of personal protective equipment. A second round of disinfection and rodent control in the municipal dog kennel was carried out close to the first one.

2.9. Ethical Statement

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was conducted as part of the IZS SI 09/15 RC research project approved by the Italian Ministry of Health on 29 July 2016 (DGSAF-0018379-P-29/07/2016) and by the Institutional Review Board of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “Adelmo Mirri” (protocol code U/0013035, 14 September 2016).
Biological samples were taken from animals suspected of leptospiral infection, and the sampling was necessary in order to perform laboratory analysis. The study did not involve any suffering of the animals sampled.

3. Results

3.1. Leptospirosis Clinical Case: From Clinical Suspicion to Laboratory Confirmation

Here, we report a case of canine leptospirosis that occurred in 2019 at the municipal dog kennel of Castelvetrano (South Italy). The suspicion of leptospirosis concerned a two-month-old mestizo puppy that was born in the shelter. The sick puppy dog stopped eating on the first day, reporting mild hyperthermia and dehydration. Jaundice was noticed on the second day. The puppy had not been vaccinated against Leptospira spp. (Group A of Table 1).
Serological test for leptospirosis carried out on the serum of the sick puppy showed antibodies against L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni (titer of 400). Also, a reaction against L. interrogans serogroup Grippotyphosa serovar Grippotyphosa was observed (titer of 200). Urine samples were found to be negative for pathogenic Leptospira spp. DNA.
Doxycycline antibiotic was administered only for a day as the animal’s condition worsened and it died on the third day. Postmortem anatomopathological examination reported a yellow and black coloration of cutis and digital bearings, presence of intestinal intussusception. Molecular analysis carried out on the kidney fragment revealed the presence of pathogenic Leptospira spp. DNA, with Ct = 34.2. All of the other molecular tests carried out on the kidney sample for differential diagnosis showed negative results.

3.2. Investigations on the Other Dogs in the Kennel and Containment Measures

Four of the sixty-six dogs housed in the shelter lived in the same box as the dead puppy. They were monitored throughout the study, and none of them showed leptospirosis clinical signs, and nor did the other animals in the kennel. All the animals housed in the shelter underwent serological analyses. At the first check (T0), eight out of sixty-six sera samples were found to be positive (12%) (Table 2) for antibodies to L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni, with titers of 1600, 400, 200, and 1100 (Table 3). The dog n. 6 showed the same titer of antibodies (100) both against L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni and L. interrogans serogroup Australis serovar Bratislava.
In addition, the urine sample (T0 + 4d) of the dog with the highest antibody titer (dog n. 1) against the pathogen was positive for Leptospira spp. DNA (Ct = 35.8). As a precaution, all the seropositive dogs as well as the four dogs living with the sick puppy were subjected to antibiotic therapy. The antibiotic treatment consisted of a 5 mg/kg dose of doxycycline orally repeated every 12 h for a period of 15 days [12].
All the animals were subjected to a second serological control 15 days after (T1). Three out of the previous positive dogs showed the same antibody titer against Leptospira spp., one animal had a decreased titer, while the other four dogs were negative. None of the other animals was found to be positive at the second serological survey.
All the urine samples collected at T1, after the antibiotic treatment, from serological positive dogs showed negative for the detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp. DNA, including the dog n. 1, despite its high antibody titer.
Concerning their vaccination status, dogs from n. 1 to n. 5 belonged to Group A, including subjects never vaccinated (Table 1 and Table 3); dogs n. 6, n. 7, and n. 8 belonged to the Group B, including animals vaccinated between one and two years (Table 1 and Table 3).

3.3. Genotyping Analyses

Both the kidney sample of the puppy and the urine sample of the dog n. 1 were subjected to genotyping analyses. The complete MLST profiles obtained from the samples are reported in Table 4.
In both cases, detected Leptospira belonged to ST17 that clustered with reference strains characterized as L. interrogans (serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) from the PubMLST and Italian Reference Center for Animal Leptospirosis (IZSLER, Brescia, Italy) databases.
Although we were not able to obtain a complete profile for the urine sample of dog n. 1, probably due to the low concentration or poor quality of leptospiral DNA in the sample (Ct = 35.8), in both cases, detected Leptospira undoubtedly belonged to ST17 that clustered with reference strains characterized as L. interrogans (serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) from the PubMLST and Italian Reference Center for Animal Leptospirosis (IZSLER, Brescia, Italy) databases (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

This study reports the occurrence of a leptospirosis clinical case in a puppy housed in the municipal kennel in Castelvetrano (Trapani, western Sicily, southern Italy). As previously reported, stray dog populations and dogs kept under kennel conditions may show a higher environmental exposure to pathogenic Leptospira spp. [10]. Following clinical suspicion, laboratory analyses allowed us to confirm a leptospirosis case in the sick puppy.
Although the urine sample collected from this animal was negative for Leptospira spp. DNA, this is consistent with our previous unpublished data and with results obtained from other studies reporting an intermittent release of bacteria in urine that is more evident in dogs with a lower antibody titer [49,50]. Serological analyses as well as molecular investigation carried out on a kidney fragment confirmed positivity for pathogenic Leptospira spp. Molecular typing allowed us to identify ST17, referred to as L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae.
Promptly, all the dogs housed in the shelter underwent both clinical and laboratory investigations twice 15 days apart. Eight dogs were found to be seropositive to L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni at the first sampling. At the second survey, four of these dogs were still positive, and the antibody titers of these animals remained constant or decreased, probably thanks to the administered antibiotic therapy. No other animals showed clinical signs consistent with leptospirosis infections. All the seropositive samples reacted against the Copenhageni serovar. This pathogen has been related to severe leptospirosis in humans [51].
This is not the first description of an outbreak in a kennel on the island. In 2013, an outbreak was recorded in Palermo municipal kennel. Also in that case, the outbreak identification followed the sudden death of a dog housed in the kennel. However, unlike this study, the dog arrived at the kennel only a few days earlier already in poor health, and did not have contact with other housed dogs. Nevertheless, the kennel was closed, and all the 413 housed dogs underwent serological screening. Of these, 47 dogs showed positive in MAT testing and were promptly subjected to antibiotic therapy. Furthermore, as in the case described here, repeated disinfestations and rodent control were carried out. After the antibiotic treatment, a second serological control was carried out, and 23 of the positive dogs became negative, while the others either had negative seroconversion or maintained a constant antibody titer, leading to the outbreak resolution. Differently from our study, the authors hypothesized that the two events (the dog death and serological positivity of the dogs housed in the kennel) were independent [52].
In another study carried out in North Italy, the authors reported an outbreak case in a kennel with 3 dogs showing clinical manifestations attributable to leptospirosis. Furthermore, 50.8% of dogs living there (apparently healthily) were serologically positive in MAT and/or molecular investigations, indicative of Leptospira infection belonging to the Sejroe serogroup. Since positive dogs also included subjects who had never come into contact with each other, the data suggested that the Leptospira spread was caused by the circulation of infected rodents [53].
Serological results obtained in this study are in agreement with our previous findings of Serovars Copenhageni, Bratislava, and Canicola in Sicilian stray dogs [38]. A recent survey carried out in the other major Italian island, Sardinia, reported that 13% (164/1289) of dogs were sero-reactive in the MAT test. Specifically, the prevalence rate was 89% in kennel dogs and 11% in owned dog. Five Leptospira serovars were detected: serovar Bratislava, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Copenhageni were prevalent, while Canicola and Grippotyphosa were also found [54].
An epidemiological survey carried out in Europe and based on serological analyses reported both the Icterohaemorrhagiae and Copenhageni serotypes as highly prevalent in dogs, reporting prevalence values up to 20% in some countries [55,56]. Other previous studies reported L. interrogans serogroup icterohaemorrhagiae as the major cause of canine leptospirosis in Europe, with prevalence values of even up to 20% in some countries [55,56]. Interestingly, this pathogen has been related to severe leptospirosis in humans [51].
Unfortunately, since the absence of an isolated strain on which to conduct a serological test with specific serovar monoclonal antibodies, as shown in Figure 1 it is not possible to discriminate between serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae and Copenhageni basing on MLST genotyping results, due to the very similar genetic content of these two serovars [57,58]. In our study, three dogs (dogs n. 1, n. 2 and n. 6) showed cross-reactions among different serovars, an effect caused by antigenic similarity. This aspecific reaction, well known among experts, represents one of the limits of MAT, especially in the early stages of the infection [59].
Among the seropositive animals, the urine of one dog tested positive at real-time PCR. This is an important aspect not only at individual level, for the diagnosis and to direct the therapeutic choice, but also from an epidemiological point of view, since we can state that at least one (dog n. 1) was able to release the bacteria into the environment, acting as a healthy eliminator and a carrier of pathogenic Leptospira spp. The genotyping analysis on dog n. 1 also confirmed the same ST obtained from the puppy dog, as expected. The early diagnosis, together with the containment measures promptly implemented in the kennel, made it possible to contain the spread of the infection within the kennel. Early identification of dogs with Leptospira spp. infection is, thus, also of primary importance because humans may be infected by direct or indirect contact with infected animals and their urine or by contact with contaminated water and soil [60]. In Italy, few recent data are available on human leptospirosis. However, other studies have shown the prevalence of infection in risk categories (hunters, farmers, forest workers, veterinarians, miners, rice field workers, soldiers, slaughterhouse workers) [61,62] and in the categories involved in outdoor or recreational activities, such as swimmers, campers, and rafters [63]. Unfortunately, in the absence of symptoms, laboratory investigations for leptospirosis are not frequently carried out.
The MAT panel used in this study included the eight serogroups circulating in Italy. This laboratory choice had the limitation of not detecting potential new circulating species, even if in this case the serological positivity was also confirmed by molecular typing by MLST.
Vaccination against leptospirosis has contributed to the decrease in infection by Leptospira interrogans serogroup Canicola serovar Canicola in Europe [64], including Italy [26,27]. A tetravalent vaccine (L. interrogans serogroup Canicola, L interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae, L. interrogans serogroup Australis, L. kirscheri serogrop Grippotyphosa) is now available against the four species that commonly infect dogs [38,64,65]. It should also be noted that the Leptospira serogroups highlighted up to now in Sicily [38] are among those against which the available tetravalent vaccines protect.
Most of the dogs at the shelter were either unvaccinated or had been vaccinated more than a year prior to cases of infection. Unfortunately, MAT does not allow us to discriminate the antibodies titres deriving from vaccination or from natural infection, nor to obtain precise information about the time when the infection occurred [27]. Therefore, it is not possible to exclude the idea that the detected antibodies in some of the serological positive dogs (presumably animals n. 6, n. 7, and n. 8) had been stimulated during the previous vaccination. Indeed, even if antibody titers decreased or could no longer be detected one year after vaccination, it was reported that Leptospira-vaccinated dogs were still protected from clinical disease, infection, and urinary excretion [66]. In the case of the puppy, on the other hand, we can hypothesize that the serious disease was also correlated and facilitated by its young age associated to its non-vaccination status. Furthermore, it has been reported that the various boosters given at least annually enhance the effectiveness of the T cell-mediated immune response and increase specific IgG antibody production [65]. Another limitation of the study is the use of a MAT panel including only the eight serogroups circulating in Italy.

5. Conclusions

The obtained results allowed us to identify a clinical case of leptospirosis and at least one asymptomatic carrier both due to L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae. The asymptomatic dog could contribute to the spread of the infection in the absence of early diagnosis and timely containment measures activated. Early diagnosis combined with the implementation of containment strategies, such as standardized hygiene protocols, rodent infestation control, and proper management of asymptotically infected dogs, has resulted in the effective prevention of the spread of infection. The abovementioned measures, in association with vaccination campaigns and annual vaccination boosters, are crucial for limiting the circulation and diffusion of Leptospira spp. and for safeguarding the health of dogs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, F.G. (Francesca Grippi) and A.T.; sampling, M.B.; laboratory investigation, P.G., C.S., F.A., R.D., I.G., F.G. (Francesca Gucciardi), M.D., and C.B.; data analysis and writing—original draft, F.G. (Francesca Grippi), V.B., and P.G.; writing—review and editing, V.B. and P.G.; project administration, A.G. and A.T.; funding acquisition, F.G. (Francesca Grippi). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant from the Italian Ministry of Health IZS SI 09/15 RC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study did not involve any animal experiments. Sample collection was carried out for laboratory analyses following the suspicion of the disease. This was needed for the laboratory analyses and did not involve any suffering of the sampled animals. This study was conducted as part of the IZS SI 09/15 RC research project approved by the Italian Ministry of Health on 29 July 2016 (DGSAF-0018379-P-29/07/2016) and by the Institutional Review Board of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “Adelmo Mirri” (protocol code U/0013035, 14 September 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pappas, G.; Papadimitriou, P.; Siozopoulou, V.; Christou, L.; Akritidis, N. The globalization of leptospirosis: Worldwide incidence trends. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 12, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Grippi, F.; Giudice, E.; Pietro, S.D.; Sciacca, C.; Santangelo, F.; Galluzzo, P.; Barreca, S.; Guercio, A. Leptospira Interrogans Serogroup Sejroe Serovar Hardjo in Aborting Cows: Two Herd Cases in Sicily (Italy). J. Vet. Res. 2020, 64, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bryson, D.G.; Ellis, W.A. Leptospirosis in a British domestic cat. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1976, 17, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ellis, W.A.; O’Brien, J.J.; Cassells, J.A.; Montgomery, J. Leptospiral infection in horses in Northen Ireland: Serological and microbiological findings. Equine Vet. J. 1983, 15, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ellis, W.A. Bovine leptospirosis in the tropics: Prevalence, pathogenesis and control. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984, 2, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gravekamp, C.; Korver, H.; Montgomery, J.; Everdard, C.O.R.; Carrington, D.; Ellis, W.A.; Terpstra, W.J. Leptospires isolated from Toads and Frogs on the Island of Barbados. Zentralblatt Bakteriol. 1991, 275, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shophet, R. A serological survey of leptospirosis in cats. N. Z. Vet. J. 1979, 27, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. White, F.H.; Sulzer, K.R.; Engel, R.W. Isolations of Leptospira interrogans serovars hardjo, balcanica, and pomona from cattle at slaughter. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1982, 43, 1172–1173. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arbour, J.; Blais, M.C.; Carioto, L.; Sylvestre, D. Clinical leptospirosis in three cats (2001–2009). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2012, 48, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miotto, B.A.; Guilloux, A.; Tozzi, B.F.; Moreno, L.Z.; da Hora, A.S.; Dias, R.A.; Heinemann, M.B.; Moreno, A.M.; Filho, A.F.D.S.; Lilenbaum, W.; et al. Prospective study of canine leptospirosis in shelter and stray dog populations: Identification of chronic carriers and different Leptospira species infecting dogs. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mohammed, H.; Nozha, C.; Hakim, K.; Abdelaziz, F. Leptospira: Morphology, classification and pathogenesis. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2011, 2, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schuller, S.; Francey, T.; Hartman, K.; Hugonnard, M.; Kohn, B.; Nally, J.E.; Sykes, J. European consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs and cats. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2015, 56, 159–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. de Paula Dreer, M.K.; Gonçalves, D.D.; da Silva Caetano, I.C.; Gerônimo, E.; Menegas, P.H.; Bergo, D.; Lopes-Mori, F.M.R.; Benitez, A.; de Freitas, J.C.; Evers, F.; et al. Toxoplasmosis, leptospirosis and brucellosis in stray dogs housed at the shelter in Umuarama municipality, Paraná, Brazil. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Schneider, M.C.; Najera, P.; Pereira, M.M.; Machado, G.; dos Anjos, C.B.; Rodrigues, R.O.; Cavagni, G.M.; Muñoz-Zanzi, C.; Corbellini, L.G.; Leone, M.; et al. Leptospirosis in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: An Ecosystem Approach in the Animal-Human Interface. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ward, M.P. Clustering of reported cases of leptospirosis among dogs in the United States and Canada. Prev. Vet. Med. 2002, 56, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mwachui, M.A.; Crump, L.; Hartskeerl, R.; Zinsstag, J.; Hattendorf, J. Environmental and Behavioural Determinants of Leptospirosis Transmission: A Systematic Review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Adler, B.; de la Peña Moctezuma, A. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soo, Z.M.P.; Khan, N.A.; Siddiqui, R. Leptospirosis: Increasing importance in developing countries. Acta Trop. 2020, 201, 105183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goarant, C. Leptospirosis: Risk factors and management challenges in developing countries. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2016, 7, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brightman, C. Leptospirosis: A leisure and occupational hazard. Trends Urol. Men’s Health 2018, 9, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rojas, P.; Monahan, A.M.; Schuller, S.; Miller, I.S.; Markey, B.K.; Nally, J.E. Detection and quantification of leptospires in urine of dogs: A maintenance host for the zoonotic disease leptospirosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 29, 1305–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, L.; Zhu, Y.; He, P.; Dong, K.; Pal, U.; et al. Distribution of plasmids in distinct Leptospira pathogenic species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004220-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Spangler, D.; Kish, D.; Beigel, B.; Morgan, J.; Gruszynski, K.; Naikare, H.; Nahar, V.K.; Coarsey, M.D.; Verma, A. Leptospiral shedding and seropositivity in shelter dogs in the Cumberland Gap Region of Southeastern Appalachia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Nelson, R.W.; Couto, C.G. Small Animal Medicine, 3rd ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pennisi, M.G.; Caprì, A.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Lombardo, G.; Torina, A.; Masucci, M. Prevalence of antibodies against Rickettsia conorii, Babesia canis, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum antigens in dogs from the Stretto di Messina area (Italy). Ticks Tick. Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tagliabue, S.; Figarolli, B.M.; D’Incau, M.; Foschi, G.; Gennero, M.S.; Giordani, R.; Natale, A.; Papa, P.; Ponti, N.; Scaltrito, D.; et al. Serological surveillance of Leptospirosis in Italy: Two-year national data (2010–2011). Vet. Ital. 2016, 52, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scanziani, E.; Origgi, F.; Giusti, A.M.; Iacchia, G.; Vasino, A.; Pirovano, G.; Scarpa, P.; Tagliabue, S. Serological survey of leptospiral infection in kennelled dogs in Italy. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2002, 43, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ehricht, R.; Slickers, P.; Goellner, S.; Hotzel, H.; Sachse, K. Optimized DNA microarray assay allows detection and genotyping of single PCR-amplifiable target copies. Mol. Cell Probes. 2006, 20, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ghalmi, F.; China, B.; Kaidi, R.; Daube, G.; Losson, B. Detection of Neospora caninum in dog organs using real time PCR systems. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schets, F.M.; de Heer, L.; de Roda Husman, A.M. Coxiella burnetii in sewage water at sewage water treatment plants in a Q fever epidemic area. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2013, 216, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Briciu, V.T.; Sebah, D.; Coroiu, G.; Lupşe, M.; Cârstina, D.; Ţăţulescu, D.F.; Mihalca, A.D.; Gherman, C.M.; Leucuţa, D.; Meyer, F.; et al. Immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR as diagnostic tools for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks collected from humans. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 69, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivacic, L.; Reed, K.D.; Mitchell, P.D.; Ghebranious, N. A LightCycler TaqMan assay for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in clinical samples. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 57, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Edvinsson, B.; Lappalainen, M.; Evengård, B.; ESCMID Study Group for Toxoplasmosis. Real-time PCR targeting a 529-bp repeat element for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006, 12, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Burg, J.L.; Grover, C.M.; Pouletty, P.; Boothroyd, J.C. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989, 27, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, R.L.; Huang, G.; Qiu, W.; Zhong, Z.H.; Xia, X.Z.; Yin, Z. Detection and differentiation of CAV-1 and CAV-2 by polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Res. Commun. 2001, 25, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Buonavoglia, C.; Martella, V.; Pratelli, A.; Tempesta, M.; Cavalli, A.; Buonavoglia, D.; Bozzo, G.; Elia, G.; Decaro, N.; Carmichael, L. Evidence for evolution of canine parvovirus type 2 in Italy. J. Gen. Virol. 2001, 82, 3021–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Touihri, L.; Bouzid, I.; Daoud, R.; Desario, C.; El Goulli, A.F.; Decaro, N.; Ghorbel, A.; Buonavoglia, C.; Bahloul, C. Molecular characterization of canine parvovirus-2 variants circulating in Tunisia. Virus Genes. 2009, 38, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Grippi, F.; Cannella, V.; Macaluso, G.; Blanda, V.; Emmolo, G.; Santangelo, F.; Vicari, D.; Galluzzo, P.; Sciacca, C.; D’Agostino, R.; et al. Serological and Molecular Evidence of Pathogenic Leptospira spp. in Stray Dogs and Cats of Sicily (South Italy), 2017–2021. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stear, M. O.I.E. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2018, 8th ed.; OIE 2018, Chapter. 3.1.12., Par. B 2.1. 2014; OIE: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  40. Aliberti, A.; Blanda, V.; Di Marco Lo Presti, V.; Macaluso, G.; Galluzzo, P.; Bertasio, C.; Sciacca, C.; Arcuri, F.; D’Agostino, R.; Ippolito, D.; et al. Leptospira interrogans Serogroup Pomona in a Dairy Cattle Farm in a Multi-Host Zootechnical System. Vet Sci. 2022, 9, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stoddard, R.A.; Gee, J.E.; Wilkins, P.P.; McCaustland, K.; Hoffmaster, A.R. Detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp. through Taqman polymerase chain reaction targeting the LipL32 gene. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 64, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galluzzo, P.; Grippi, F.; Di Bella, S.; Santangelo, F.; Sciortino, S.; Castiglia, A.; Sciacca, C.; Arnone, M.; Alduina, R.; Chiarenza, G. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Stray Dogs from Southern Italy. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bertasio, C.; Papetti, A.; Scaltriti, E.; Tagliabue, S.; D’Incau, M.; Boniotti, M.B. Serological Survey and Molecular Typing Reveal New Leptospira Serogroup Pomona Strains among Pigs of Northern Italy. Pathogens 2020, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Boonsilp, S.; Thaipadungpanit, J.; Amornchai, P.; Wuthiekanun, V.; Bailey, M.S.; Holden, M.T.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, X.; Koizumi, N.; Taylor, K.; et al. A single multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for seven pathogenic Leptospira species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Salaün, L.; Mérien, F.; Gurianova, S.; Baranton, G.; Picardeau, M. Application of multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for molecular typing of the agent of leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3954–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Weiss, S.; Menezes, A.; Woods, K.; Chanthongthip, A.; Dittrich, S.; Opoku-Boateng, A.; Kimuli, M.; Chalker, V. An Extended Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Scheme for Rapid Direct Typing of Leptospira from Clinical Samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Macaluso, G.; Torina, A.; Blanda, V.; Guercio, A.; Lastra, A.; Giacchino, I.; D’Agostino, R.; Sciacca, C.; D’Incau, M.; Bertasio, C.; et al. Leptospira in Slaughtered Fattening Pigs in Southern Italy: Serological Survey and Molecular Typing. Animals 2022, 12, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harkin, K.R.; Roshto, Y.M.; Sullivan, J.T.; Purivs, T.J.; Chengappa, M.M. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay, bacteriologic culture, and serologic testing in assessment of prevalence of urinary shedding of leptospires in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 1230–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sant’Anna, R.; Vieira, A.S.; Oliveira, J.; Lilenbaum, W. Asymptomatic leptospiral infection is associated with canine chronic kidney disease. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 62, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bharti, A.R.; Nally, J.E.; Ricaldi, J.N.; Matthias, M.A.; Diaz, M.M.; Lovett, M.A.; Levett, P.N.; Gilman, R.H.; Willig, M.R.; Gotuzzo, E.; et al. Peru-United States Leptospirosis Consortium, Leptospirosis: A zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet. 2003, 12, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Grippi, F.; Vesco, G.; Santangelo, F.; Giannitrapani, V.; Gargano, V.; Randazzo, V.; Francaviglia, F.; Giunta, F.; Lombardo, S.; Giambruno, P. Caso di leptospirosi canina: Focolaio di infezione presso il Canile Municipale di Palermo (Sicilia) e sua gestione. Summa-Anim. Compagnia 2015, 1, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  53. Balboni, A.; Mazzotta, E.; Boniotti, M.B.; Bertasio, C.; Bellinati, L.; Lucchese, L.; Battilani, M.; Ceglie, L.; Marchione, S.; Esposito, G.; et al. Outbreak of Leptospira borgpetersenii Serogroup Sejroe Infection in Kennel: The Role of Dogs as Sentinel in Specific Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Piredda, I.; Ponti, M.N.; Piras, A.; Palmas, B.; Pintore, P.; Pedditzi, A.; Chisu, V. New Insights on Leptospira Infections in a Canine Population from North Sardinia, Italy: A Sero-Epidemiological Study. Biology 2021, 10, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ellis, W.A. Control of canine leptospirosis in Europe: Time for a change? Vet. Rec. 2010, 167, 602–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Delaude, A.; Rodriguez-Campos, S.; Dreyfus, A.; Counotte, M.J.; Francey, T.; Schweighauser, A.; Lettry, S.; Schuller, S. Canine leptospirosis in Switzerland—A prospective cross-sectional study examining seroprevalence, risk factors and ur- inary shedding of pathogenic leptospires. Prev. Vet. Med. 2017, 141, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Majed, Z.; Bellenger, E.; Postic, D.; Pourcel, C.; Baranton, G.; Picardeau, M. Identification of variable-number tandem-repeat loci in leptospira interrogans sensu stricto. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kmety, E.; Dikken, H. Classification of the Species Leptospira Interrogans and History of its Serovars; University Press Groningen: Groningen, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  59. Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 296–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Samir, A.; Soliman, R.; El-Hariri, M.; Abdel-Moein, K.; Hatem, M.E. Leptospirosis in animals and human contacts in Egypt: Broad range surveillance. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2015, 48, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Schneider, M.C.; Jancloes, M.; Buss, D.F.; Aldighieri, S.; Bertherat, E.; Najera, P.; Galan, D.I.; Durski, K.; Espinal, M.A. Leptospirosis: A silent epidemic disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 7229–7234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leptospirosis: Risk of Exposure. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/leptospirosis/exposure/index.html (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  63. Awosanya, E.J.; Nguku, P.; Oyemakinde, A.; Omobowale, O. Factors Associated with Probable Cluster of Leptospirosis among Kennel Workers in Abuja, Nigeria. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2013, 16, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. André-Fontaine, G. Canine leptospirosis—Do we have a problem? Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 117, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Novak, A.; Hindriks, E.; Hoek, A.; Veraart, C.; Broens, E.M.; Ludwig, I.; Rutten, V.; Sloots, A.; Broere, F. Cellular and humoral immune responsiveness to inactivated Leptospira interrogans in dogs vaccinated with a tetravalent Leptospira vaccine. Vaccine 2023, 41, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wilson, S.; Stirling, C.; Thomas, A.; King, V.; Plevová, E.; Chromá, L.; Siedek, E.; Illambas, J.; Salt, J.; Sture, G. Duration of immunity of a multivalent (DHPPi/L4R) canine vaccine against four Leptospira serovars. Vaccine 2013, 31, 3126–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vetsci 10 00508 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree built on concatenated sequences of the seven multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) loci (3111 bp) of scheme 1. Phylogeny was conducted in MEGA X using the Neighbor-Joining method and bootstrap values are indicated on the respective branches. The samples are indicated with ST, species, serogroup, serovar, strain.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree built on concatenated sequences of the seven multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) loci (3111 bp) of scheme 1. Phylogeny was conducted in MEGA X using the Neighbor-Joining method and bootstrap values are indicated on the respective branches. The samples are indicated with ST, species, serogroup, serovar, strain.
Vetsci 10 00508 g001
Table 1. Vaccination status against Leptospira spp. of the dogs housed in the kennel.
Table 1. Vaccination status against Leptospira spp. of the dogs housed in the kennel.
GroupVaccination StatusNumber of Dogs
ANever vaccinated42/67
BVaccination between 1 and 2 years ago12/67
CVaccinated more than 2 years ago13/67
Table 2. Serum samples of 66 dogs by microscopic agglutination test (MAT).
Table 2. Serum samples of 66 dogs by microscopic agglutination test (MAT).
TimeNegative Samples (%)Positive Samples (%)
T058/66 (87.9%)8/66 (12.1%)
T162/66 (93.9%)4/66 (6.1%)
Table 3. Leptospira spp. serogroup/serovar and antibody titers of the positive serum samples.
Table 3. Leptospira spp. serogroup/serovar and antibody titers of the positive serum samples.
ID Positive
Sample (n = 66)		Leptospira spp. Serogroup/SerovarTiter T0Titer T1Vaccination Status
Dog n. 1L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni16001600
L. interrogans serogroup Australis serovar Bratislava800200Group A
L. borgpetersenii serogroup Ballum serovar Ballum100<100
Dog n. 2L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni400<100
L. interrogans serogroup Australis serovar Bratislava100<100Group A
Dog n. 3L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni200200Group A
Dog n. 4L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni200200Group A
Dog n. 5L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni200100Group A
Dog n. 6L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni100<100Group B
L. interrogans serogroup Australis serovar Bratislava100<100
Dog n. 7L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni100<100Group B
Dog n. 8L. interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorragiae serovar Copenhageni1100<100Group B
Table 4. Results of multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis.
Table 4. Results of multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis.
SampleSTglmUpntAsucAtpiApfkBmreAcaiB
Puppy1711221048
Dog n. 117 (partial)n.d.12210n.d.8
ST: sequence type; n.d.: not defined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grippi, F.; Blanda, V.; Galluzzo, P.; Bongiorno, M.; Sciacca, C.; Arcuri, F.; D’Agostino, R.; Giacchino, I.; Gucciardi, F.; D’Incau, M.; et al. A Canine Leptospirosis Clinical Case Due to Leptospira interrogans (Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) in a Dog Kennel in Castelvetrano (Western Sicily, South Italy). Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080508

AMA Style

Grippi F, Blanda V, Galluzzo P, Bongiorno M, Sciacca C, Arcuri F, D’Agostino R, Giacchino I, Gucciardi F, D’Incau M, et al. A Canine Leptospirosis Clinical Case Due to Leptospira interrogans (Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) in a Dog Kennel in Castelvetrano (Western Sicily, South Italy). Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(8):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grippi, Francesca, Valeria Blanda, Paola Galluzzo, Manuel Bongiorno, Carmela Sciacca, Francesca Arcuri, Rosalia D’Agostino, Ilenia Giacchino, Francesca Gucciardi, Mario D’Incau, and et al. 2023. "A Canine Leptospirosis Clinical Case Due to Leptospira interrogans (Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) in a Dog Kennel in Castelvetrano (Western Sicily, South Italy)" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 8: 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080508

APA Style

Grippi, F., Blanda, V., Galluzzo, P., Bongiorno, M., Sciacca, C., Arcuri, F., D’Agostino, R., Giacchino, I., Gucciardi, F., D’Incau, M., Bertasio, C., Torina, A., & Guercio, A. (2023). A Canine Leptospirosis Clinical Case Due to Leptospira interrogans (Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae) in a Dog Kennel in Castelvetrano (Western Sicily, South Italy). Veterinary Sciences, 10(8), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop