Reactions to a Low-Fat Milk Social Media Intervention in the US: The Choose 1% Milk Campaign
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Intervention
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Participants
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Thematic Group 1: Sugar, Fat, and Nutrients
3.2. Thematic Group 2: Defiant
3.3. Thematic Group 3: Watery Milk
3.4. Thematic Group 4: Personal Preference
3.5. Thematic Group 5: Evidence
3.6. Thematic Group 6: Pure and Natural
4. Discussion
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee; US Human Nutrition Information Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
- US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 3rd ed.; US Human Nutrition Information Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/1990.asp (accessed on 12 April 2017).
- US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th ed.; Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. Available online: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/ (accessed on 1 February 2016).
- US Department of Agriculture Services and US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 7th ed.; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/dietaryguidelines2010.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2011).
- US Department of Agriculture Services and US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 6th ed.; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/ (accessed on 12 April 2017).
- US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 5th ed.; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2000.asp (accessed on 12 April 2017).
- US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 4th ed.; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. Available online: https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/1995.asp (accessed on 12 April 2017).
- US Department of Agriculture. Fluid milk sales by product (Annual) [Data file]; 2012. Available online: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/dairy-data.aspx (accessed on 5 May 2017).
- Rehm, C.D.; Drewnowski, A.; Monsivais, P. Potential Population-level Nutritional Impact of Replacing Whole and Reduced-fat Milk with Low-Fat and Skim Milk among US Children Aged 2–19 years. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2015, 47, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. (2015) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program State Activity Report: Fiscal Year; 2014. Available online: www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/FY14%20State%20Activity%20Report.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2017).
- Finnell, K.J.; John, R.; Thompson, D.M. 1% Low-Fat Milk has Perks!: An Evaluation of a Social Marketing Intervention. Prev. Med. Rep. 2017, 5, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Finnell, K.J.; John, R. A Social Marketing Approach to 1% Milk Use: Resonance is the Key. Health Promot. Pract. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luntz, F. Words That Work: It is Not What You Say, It is What People Hear; Hyperion: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN-13: 978-1401302597. [Google Scholar]
- Finnell, K.J.; John, R. Formative Research to Understand the Psychographics of 1% Milk Consumption in a Low-Income Audience. Soc. Mark. Q. 2017, 23, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blashfield, R.K. Mixture Model Tests of Cluster Analysis: Accuracy of 4 Agglomerative Hierarchical Methods. Psychol. Bull. 1976, 83, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, S.C. Hierarchical Clustering Schemes. Psychometrika 1967, 32, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kettenring, J.R. The Practice of Cluster Analysis. J. Classif. 2006, 23, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgen, F.H.; Barnett, D.C. Applying Cluster Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research. J. Couns. Psychol. 1987, 34, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clatworthy, J.; Buick, D.; Hankins, M.; Weinman, J.; Home, R. The Use and Reporting of Cluster Analysis in Health Psychology: A Review. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2005, 10, 329–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Punj, G.; Stewart, D.W. Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application. J. Mark. Res. 1983, 20, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dice, L.R. Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association between Species. Ecology 1945, 26, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yule, G.U. On the Methods of Measuring Association between Two Attributes. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1912, 75, 79–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kendall, M.G.; Stuart, A. Inference and Relationship. In The Advanced Theory of Statistics; Griffin: London, UK, 1961; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey-1 Year Estimate: Summary File B01003: Total Population: 2014. Available online: https://factfinder.census.gov/ (accessed on 30 June 2017).
- Thackeray, R.; Neiger, B.L.; Smith, A.K.; Van Wagenen, S.B. Adoption and Use of Social Media among Public Health Departments. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steptoe, A.; Pollard, T.M.; Wardle, J. Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food—The Food Choice Questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- John, R.; Kerby, D.S.; Landers, P.S. A Market Segmentation Approach to Nutrition Education among Low-Income Individuals. Soc. Mark. Q. 2004, 10, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wechsler, H.; Wernick, S.M. A Social Marketing Campaign to Promote Low-Fat Milk Consumption in an Inner-City Latino Community. Public Health Rep. 1992, 107, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lee, N.R.; Kotler, P.A. Social Marketing: Changing Behaviors for Good, 5th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2015; ISBN-13: 978–1452292144. [Google Scholar]
- Leak, T.M.; Benavente, L.; Goodel, L.S.; Lassiter, A.; Jones, L.; Bowen, S. EFNEP Graduates’ Perspectives on Social Media to Supplement Nutrition Education: Focus Group Findings from Active Users. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2014, 46, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tobey, L.N.; Manore, M.M. Social Media and Nutrition Education: The Food Hero Experience. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2014, 46, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seymour, B.; Getman, R.; Saraf, A.; Zhang, L.H.; Kalenderian, E. When Advocacy Obscures Accuracy Online: Digital Pandemics of Public Health Misinformation through an Antifluoride Case Study. Am. J. Public Health 2015, 105, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunn, A.G.; Leask, J.; Zhou, X.J.; Mandl, K.D.; Coiera, E. Associations between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions about Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 1st ed.; The Seabury Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970; ISBN-13: 978-0826412768. [Google Scholar]
Post # | Date Posted | Advertisement | People Reached | Post- Clicks | Likes | Shares | Comments Analyzed | Cost Per Engagement (Like, Comment, Share & Post-Click) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9/16 | Campaign launched. | |||||||
1 | 9/16 | Fact: 1% milk has all the nutrients of 2%, but with half the fat. Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, parent, pregnancy, family and relationships | 110,592 | 1042 | 222 | 20 | 30 | $0.44 |
2 | 9/18 | Add a little sunshine to your diet with 1% low-fat milk. It has all the Vitamin D of 2% milk. Priority Audience: Fans and friends of fans | 52,608 | 157 | 72 | 4 | 5 | $1.24 |
3 | 9/19 | Don’t be a bonehead! Next time you buy milk, choose 1%! Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, pregnancy, family, and relationships | 73,888 | 2103 | 1387 | 69 | 64 | $0.16 |
4 | 9/21 | Did you know that 1% milk has all the vitamins and minerals as 2% milk, but with half the fat? http://chooseonepercent.com Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, pregnancy, family, and relationships | 99,424 | 745 | 655 | 29 | 38 | $0.40 |
5 | 9/24 | Build strong muscles and bones with 1% low-fat milk. It’s the ultimate protein drink! http://chooseonepercent.com Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, pregnancy, family, and relationships | 99,488 | 513 | 500 | 19 | 25 | $0.70 |
6 | 9/26 | We all know 1% milk has less fat, but does it have less vitamin D? No! Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, pregnancy, family, and relationships | 110,208 | 974 | 1081 | 62 | 41 | $0.34 |
7 | 9/26 | Fact: 1% milk is not watered down! It has all the calcium of 2%, but less saturated fat. http://chooseonepercent.com Priority Audience: Fans and friends of fans | 51,344 | 366 | 150 | 11 | 9 | $1.15 |
8 | 9/30 | Just the facts: 1% milk has all the protein, vitamin D and calcium of 2%, but with half the fat! Make the choice for a healthier you—and a healthier family. http://chooseonepercent.com Priority Audience: Low-income, parenting, family, and fitness | 28,864 | 480 | 124 | 8 | 21 | $0.82 |
9 | 10/7 | FACT: 2% milk contains double the amount of fat found in 1%. Priority Audience: 18–65+ | 122,816 | 610 | 155 | 19 | 53 | $0.67 |
10 | 10/7 | Q: Which has more sugar, 1% milk or 2%? A: Trick question! They’re the SAME. Priority Audience: Parenting | 120,704 | 674 | 333 | 11 | 23 | $0.95 |
11 | 10/8 | Lots of people believe the fat in milk is healthy, but the majority of studies show that 1% is a better choice. Priority Audience: Fans and friends of fans | 68,640 | 699 | 176 | 14 | 44 | $0.99 |
12 | 10/10 | FACT: Once children reach 2 years of age, they don’t need the fat in 2% and whole milk to grow. 1% is the healthy choice! Priority Audience: Mother, fatherhood, and parenting | 147,904 | 1053 | 750 | 92 | 103 | $0.55 |
13 | 10/13 | On average, it takes 2 weeks to adjust to the taste of 1% milk and you still get the nine essential nutrients of milk! Priority Audience: Low-income | 79,648 | 1077 | 220 | 23 | 51 | $0.81 |
14 | 10/14 | Get your fats straight! Priority Audience: 18–65+ | 161,792 | 829 | 312 | 12 | 47 | $0.87 |
15 | 10/14 | Kick the excessive sugars and additives in sports drinks. 1% milk is packed with vitamins and nutrients your body needs! Priority Audience: Parenting | 102,112 | 402 | 491 | 25 | 18 | $1.20 |
16 | 10/17 | Children need milk. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends 1% milk after the child’s second birthday Priority Audience: Motherhood, fatherhood, parenting, pregnancy, family, and relationships | 105,920 | 351 | 517 | 34 | 20 | $0.57 |
10/17 | Campaign ended | |||||||
Totals | 1,535,952 | 12,075 | 7145 | 452 | 592 | $0.74 |
Thematic Group | Sub-Theme Comment [Facebook Post # in Table 1] |
---|---|
1. Sugar, Fat, and Nutrients (n = 118) | Fat and Sugar (n = 37) What they take out of whole milk they replace with sugar/sweetener. [#5] The lower the fat content, the higher the sugar content. [#1] And full of sugar! [#7] Flavored sugar filled milk contributes way more to childhood obesity. [#12] This is so wrong. Stop selling garbage information to young parents and killing our babies with sugar...[#12] Sugar water [#3] |
Nutrients (n = 35) I could be wrong, but aren’t all nutrients super-heated out then added back in? Hydrogenated [sic] means super-heated. [#13] 1% has more vitamins because it has more milk. [#9] With that logic lots of things are “packed” with nutrients, but the amounts are very little. [#13] One percent milk has no vitamins to make bones grow strong and help the teeth also.[#12] | |
Healthy Fat (n = 31) Actually low fat has been shown to be ineffective at weight loss. [#7] Fat is required to digest nutrients found in milk. [#14] Did you know that the fat in whole milk is good for you? [#4] Yup fat and cholesterol are good for you. [#1] Wow another lie this milk … has no vitamins at all bc it's in the fat content...take a nutrition class. [#2] | |
Fat is Good for Children (n = 16) There are fats in whole milk that help children’s brain development. [#14] For adults it’s better, but for children it’s not. [#6] Children’s brains NEED good fats to develop. [#12] | |
2. Defiant (n = 110) | Rejection (n = 75) BS, 1% milk is worthless. [#4] No one really knows wtf is good or bad for you now-a-days. [#3] Don’t care. Not drinking 1%. [#10] |
Sarcasm (n = 30) Well duh! [#9] How much time and money were wasted to come to this incredible conclusion? [#9] | |
Tyranny (n = 8) How about we let the parents do the parenting......1% is yuk! [#12] Government at work in our homes now!!!!! [#4] Stupid government telling people how to eat and everyone’s falling for it. SMH. [#12] | |
3. Watery Milk (n = 98) | Sensory Experience (n = 77) Might as well drink water. No taste. [#6] It’s blue tinged. [#12] When I drink milk, I want to taste milk, not water. [#9] My words exactly whole milk...1% is blue water!!! [#3] |
Watered Down (n = 31) We come from a dairy farm and we don’t want our milk watered down. [#3] 100% milk builds strong bones. Not watered down fake 1%! [#3] It is mostly water. [#4] It's just water with a splash of milk in it duh [#9] | |
Cost (n = 8) They make more money off 1% milk! (Less milk and more water!) [#3] It’s about money. [#10] You are paying for mostly water. [#13] Read the labels folks. They must own stock in a water company [#16] | |
4. Personal Preference (n = 93) | Likes High-Fat Milk (n = 50) Whole milk all the way. [#3] Whole milk is my favorite. [#5] 2% is my fav. [#6] |
Likes Low-Fat Milk (n = 30) I love skim milk! [#1] 1% is our choice. [#5] We have been drinking 1% for years, and love it. [#9] | |
Raw Milk (n = 23) Straight from the cow or nothing. [#6] Not just whole milk but whole RAW milk is the healthiest of all. [#4] I want it fresh from the cow. [#8] | |
5. Evidence and Logic (n = 79) | Scientific Evidence (n = 38) False advertising. There is absolutely no scientific evidence that people who drink cow’s milk have stronger bones. [#3] Studies have come out to show that’s not true. Whole milk is best. [#12] My son’s Dr says that 2% is best. [#12} I challenge the person who came up with this crazy idea to prove it.[#12] |
Anecdotal Evidence (n = 32) Whole milk is the best. Pioneers didn’t have 1% and they survived just fine. [#3] I find it funny that our grandparents and great grandparents drank whole milk if it wasn’t straight from a cow and lived to be a ripe old age. [#3] I’ve been drinking whole milk my entire life and have never been over weight, even after two kids. [#13] | |
Exercise (n = 14) Walk a little more and enjoy the 2 percent. [#9] Fat free or low fat isn’t the answer. Portion control and exercise. [#14] Wow the Time we talk about this you could have walked outside and said high to the neighbors, and burnt more fat than a glass of milk would provide. [#12] | |
6. Pure and Natural (n = 64) | Nature (n = 33) There’s nothing wrong with the milk God made. [#12] The vitamins and minerals are added to 1% they aren’t natural. [#9] Milk is from nature. Store milk is from chemistry. [#6] |
Milk Alternatives (n = 21) I will just drink my almond milk! [#14] Cow’s milk is nasty. I much prefer plant milks. [#3] Use unsweetened soy milk and let the calves drink the milk they should be getting. [#13] | |
Contamination (n = 19) May have Vitamin D but it also has growth hormones that are not good for us!! [#2] Milk has pus from cows, hormones and antibiotics. [#13] Investigate the chemicals used to remove the fat from milk!! [#6] |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
John, R.; Finnell, K.J.; Kerby, D.S.; Owen, J.; Hansen, K. Reactions to a Low-Fat Milk Social Media Intervention in the US: The Choose 1% Milk Campaign. Beverages 2017, 3, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040047
John R, Finnell KJ, Kerby DS, Owen J, Hansen K. Reactions to a Low-Fat Milk Social Media Intervention in the US: The Choose 1% Milk Campaign. Beverages. 2017; 3(4):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040047
Chicago/Turabian StyleJohn, Robert, Karla J. Finnell, Dave S. Kerby, Jade Owen, and Kendra Hansen. 2017. "Reactions to a Low-Fat Milk Social Media Intervention in the US: The Choose 1% Milk Campaign" Beverages 3, no. 4: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040047
APA StyleJohn, R., Finnell, K. J., Kerby, D. S., Owen, J., & Hansen, K. (2017). Reactions to a Low-Fat Milk Social Media Intervention in the US: The Choose 1% Milk Campaign. Beverages, 3(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040047