Next Article in Journal
Short Term Results of Fibrin Gel Obtained from Cord Blood Units: A Preliminary in Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction of Peak Velocity Profiles from Doppler Echocardiography Using Image Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
3D Printing High-Consistency Enzymatic Nanocellulose Obtained from a Soda-Ethanol-O2 Pine Sawdust Pulp

Bioengineering 2019, 6(3), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030065

Communication
Nanocellulose-Based Inks—Effect of Alginate Content on the Water Absorption of 3D Printed Constructs
1
Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Science, Universidad de Córdoba, Building Marie-Curie, Campus de Rabanales, 14014 Córdoba, Spain
2
RISE PFI, Høgskoleringen 6b, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 May 2019 / Accepted: 27 July 2019 / Published: 30 July 2019

Abstract

:
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpyperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) were used as ink for three-dimensional (3D) printing of porous structures with potential as wound dressings. Alginate (10, 20, 30 and 40 wt%) was incorporated into the formulation to facilitate the ionic cross-linking with calcium chloride (CaCl2). The effect of two different concentrations of CaCl2 (50 and 100 mM) was studied. The 3D printed hydrogels were freeze-dried to produce aerogels which were tested for water absorption. Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM) pictures demonstrated that the higher the concentration of the cross-linker the higher the definition of the printed tracks. CNF-based aerogels showed a remarkable water absorption capability. Although the incorporation of alginate and the cross-linking with CaCl2 led to shrinkage of the 3D printed constructs, the approach yielded suitable porous structures for water and moisture absorption. It is concluded that the 3D printed biocomposite structures developed in this study have characteristics that are promising for wound dressings devices.
Keywords:
nanocellulose; 3D printing; absorption; wound dressings

1. Introduction

The biomedical area is constantly developing new biomaterials with optimized properties for a given application. Wound management is a particularly demanding area with constant challenges, which motivate continuous efforts to develop tailor-made materials for specific wounds, e.g., chronic and burn wounds. In such cases, foams and hydrogels can be applied to absorb exudates, provide moisture, reduce pain and limit bacterial growth [1,2]. During the last years, cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) have appeared as a promising material for wound dressings. Importantly, CNF have several beneficial characteristics for wound dressing applications, including: absorption of large quantities of liquid, capability to form highly translucent structures with adequate mechanical properties, ability to inhibit bacterial growth and is generally cytocompatible with interesting immunogenic properties [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpyperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation is one of the most commonly used methods for the production of carboxylated CNF [12]. TEMPO pre-treatment consists on the oxidation of the C6 primary hydroxyls groups of the glucose units to carboxyl groups. The higher amount of negatively charged groups increases the electrostatic repulsion between the nanofibrils, which facilitates the fibrillation and reduces the energy consumption during homogenization. Interestingly, the presence of negatively charged carboxyl groups in the CNF may provide new properties such as ionic cross-linking capability.
TEMPO CNF-based structures have the capability to absorb large quantity of water and maintain a moistening environment suitable for wound healing [3,13]. Additionally, we have previously demonstrated that TEMPO CNF inhibits growth of P. aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen commonly occurring in infected wounds [5,14]. These characteristics suggest that TEMPO CNF could be directly used as moistening dressings for, e.g., treatment of burns. Moreover, such properties could be improved by manufacturing tailor-made porous structures by three-dimensional (3D) printing [15].
It is worth to mention that the hydrophilic nature of CNF, due to its large number of hydroxyl groups on their surface, and the electrical sensitivity of cellulose to water vapor, allows CNF structures to be used as moisture sensor [16,17], which was recently demonstrated for TEMPO CNF [18]. Moreover, moisture balance is especially critical in wound dressings, as excessively moist tissue can lead to maceration and insufficient moisture can lead to drying of the wound, affecting the healing process. Thus, proper wound moisture monitoring can reduce wound healing time as well as the number of dressing changes [19]. In this respect, it is also valuable to assess the moisture and water absorption capability of CNF-based materials. This will in addition provide the necessary data for clinicians to evaluate the specific wound dressing for a particular wound and wound management.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a layer-by-layer manufacturing process, which enables the rapid fabrication of model objects with complex structures and geometries. Depending on the technology, different raw materials (i.e., plastic, metal, ceramic, glass or biocomposites) can be used for 3D printing [20,21]. For instance, hydrogels can be 3D printed by Direct Ink Writing (DIW), which basically consists on the cold extrusion of a hydrogel through a syringe [22]. Common hydrogels used in 3D printing are biopolymers such as collagen, hyaluronic acid, chitosan or alginate [23]. A major challenge for the 3D printing of hydrogels is their collapse after 3D printing, which dramatically affects the shape fidelity of the printed structure. Due to its shear thinning behavior and rapid consolidation after deposition, CNF has excellent properties to be used in 3D printing applications [24]. Additionally, CNF can be combined with other biopolymers such as alginates to tailor the mechanical properties [25,26]. There are various types of alginates, which can be obtained from different algae and with varying composition of β-d-mannuronic acid (M) and α-l-guluronic acid (G). The composition of M- and G-blocks affects the mechanical properties of the alginates. For a good description of the effect of different alginates on the mechanical properties of CNF/alginates biocomposite gels, see Aarstad et al. [25].
CNF provides a rheology suitable for the extrusion process and alginate potentiates the cross-linking with divalent cations such as calcium [27]. CNF and alginates can thus be applied as inks for the controlled structuring of porous materials. Therefore, 3D printing of CNF/alginate biocomposite hydrogels is a promising pathway for the manufacturing of biobased porous structures with adequate mechanical and liquid absorption properties.
According to Boateng et al. [28], water uptake is one of the characteristics relevant for wound dressings. However, little information is available in the literature about water absorption of 3D printed constructs for wound dressing applications. Hence, in the present study, 3D printing of constructs based on CNF and varying amounts of alginate was demonstrated and the corresponding moisture and water absorption was quantified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. CNF Preparation

Pinus radiata kraft pulp fibers (CMPC, Chile) were chemically pre-treated with (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxyl (TEMPO), using 3 mmol of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) per gram of cellulose. The kraft pulp fibers had a concentration of 1 wt% and were homogenized with a Rannie 15 type 12.56X homogenizer (operated at 1000 bar pressure). The CNF was collected after three passes through the homogenizer. The carboxyl acid content has been previously quantified to 982 ± 7.6 μmol/g for the same CNF grade used in this study [29].

2.2. Ink Composition

A series of CNF-alginate compositions (inks) were prepared for 3D printing (Table 1). Alginate (PROTANAL LF 10/60, FMC corporation) and CNF were mixed using mechanical stirring until obtaining a homogeneous mixture. The amounts of alginate added were based on the dry weight of the CNF.

2.3. Viscosity

The viscosities of the inks CNF, CNF_A20 and CNF_A40 were assessed using a Brookfield viscometer (Brookfield DV2TRV, John Morris Group, Sydney, Australia). The assessed volume was 20 mL at a temperature of 23 ± 1 °C and speeds of 1, 2, 6 and 10 RPM, using a spindle V-73.

2.4. 3D Printing

The inks were 3D printed using a Regemat3D bioprinter (version 1.0), equipped with the Regemat3D Designer, version 1.8, Regemat3D (Granada, Spain). The target length, width and height of the 3D printed structures were 40 mm, 20 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The structures were printed directly on microscopy slides. The target width of the printed tracks was 0.41 mm. The space between the tracks was 2 mm. The flow speed was 2 mm/s, using a 0.58 mm conical nozzle. The inks were kept at room temperature (25 °C) for 24 h before printing. The 3D printed structures were cross-linked immersing the samples in calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution (either at concentration of 50 mM or 100 mM) for 24 h. A blank sample without cross-linking was also prepared.
The area of the printed 3D constructs was quantified by image analysis using the ImageJ program.
After the cross-linking the samples were flushed with distilled water to remove the excess of CaCl2 and freeze-dried for 24 h in a Telstar LyoQuest at −83 °C.

2.5. Water Absorption Capacity

The water absorption capability of the 3D printed structures was measured by immersing a pre-weighed dry sample in distilled water for 24 h and weighed at different specific times. The excess surface water was removed with filter paper before weighing. The water absorption capacity was calculated using Equation (1):
W a t e r   s o r p t i o n   c a p a c i t y   ( % ) = W t W o W o · 100
where Wt is the weight of the sample at a specific time and Wo is the weight of dry sample.
For measurement of moisture absorption, the prepared aerogels were placed in a climate chamber (23 °C, 90% relative humidity) during 24 h and weighed periodically. The moisture content was calculated as the difference of mass measurements at different times and the initial dry state weight using Equation (1). This analysis was carried out in triplicate and the mean value was provided.

2.6. SEM and Porosity

3D printed samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopy analysis (SEM, Hitachi SU3500 Scanning Electron Microscope, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan). The freeze-dried samples were coated with a layer of gold to make the surface conductive. The equipment for gold coating was an Agar Auto Sputter Coater (Agar Scientific, Essex, UK). The images were acquired in secondary electron imaging (SEI), using 5 kV and 6 mm acceleration voltage and working distance, respectively.

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the viscosity of the inks CNF, CNF_A20 and CNF_A40. These compositions were used for comparison purposes. As expected, increasing the amount of alginate from 0, to 20 and 40 wt% decreases the viscosity of the inks, confirming also previous results [26]. Figure 1 exemplifies also the reduction of the viscosity as the speed increases, i.e., the inks have clear shear thinning behavior. The contribution of CNF to the rheological properties of the ink is a clear advantage for 3D printing operations.
Structures composed of four layers (height = 2 mm) and a size of 40 × 20 mm were 3D printed (Figure 2) and freeze-dried. Morphological aspects of the aerogels made of CNF (with and without CaCl2 as crosslinker) and samples with 40% of alginate (with CaCl2 as crosslinker) were investigated by SEM images (Figure 3). The microscopy assessment reveals that an increase in the alginate content leads to a lower resolution of the 3D printed constructs. Likely, the presence of alginate in the formulation increased the lateral flow of the inks, which reduced the shape fidelity of the 3D printed objects (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The alginate applied in this study had a higher flowability compared to CNF (Figure S1: Alginate and CNF inks for 3D printing). Hence, alginate does not provide good printability and shape fidelity (Figure S2: 3D printing with alginate and CNF inks).
For the neat CNF, the spaces between the printed tracks are clearly visible (Figure 3). When the cross-linking was performed with CaCl2 (CNF_C50 and CNF_C100), the shrinkage of the hydrogel caused a greater definition of the printed tracks and a greater detail in the porous structure. The SEM analysis also confirmed that the inks containing alginate had a larger lateral flow, since the spaces between the tracks were not clearly visible. Such effect was lower when a higher concentration of CaCl2 was used. Apparently, constriction of the ink occurred during the cross-linking, as shown in sample CNF_A40_C100.
The hydroxyl, carboxyl and other polar groups found in the chemical structure of polysaccharides have the capability to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which have a remarkable effect on the moisture and water absorption. Moreover, the chains of polysaccharides can form networks between themselves, which keep the moisture content [30].
Figure 4 shows that neat CNF, cross-linked with CaCl2 had the highest moisture absorption in comparison with the inks based on the combination of CNF with alginate. The use of a higher CaCl2 concentration produced an increase in the moisture absorption capacity of the samples due to the hygroscopic behavior of the salt. The 3D printed structures developed in the present study showed a holding capacity of up to 165% (1.65 g of water vapor per g material) when CNF was cross-linked with CaCl2. Thus, the combination of both CNF and CaCl2 seems to be an effective material as moisture absorber. In general, the addition of alginate reduced the moisture absorption capacity of CNF. Nonetheless, the moisture absorption of the CNF-alginate structures was between 30 and 100% (0.3–1 g of water vapor per g material).
In Figure 5, the water absorption isotherms are presented for the different samples. The graphs show that the greatest capacity of water absorption is presented by neat CNF (1800% weight gain). However, the addition of alginate reduced the capacity of water absorption up to 1200% weight gain over the initial dry weight. This behavior has been reported in previous studies, where the addition of oxidized CNF improves the absorption and retention properties of alginate sponges, reaching values of 1400% of water absorbance [31]. At the same time, CNF presented better results than the use of cellulose nanocrystals. This is due to the reduction of porosity, as the internal microstructure network is modified by the interconnection of alginate with CNF. The pore network allows water molecules to pass through and fully permeate the full structure. In addition, a uniform porous structure will “lock” the water inside the structure and limit the runoff of the water [31]. It was also observed that the use of CaCl2 as cross-linker reduced the water absorption capacity. Hence, the higher the concentration of CaCl2, the lower the water absorption of neat CNF. The reduction of water absorption for the samples containing alginate was detected only for the samples cross-linked with 100 mmol CaCl2. It has been demonstrated that inks containing increasing alginate content led to stiffer structures after the cross-linking with Ca2+ [26]. During the cationic cross-linking, the ionic links between COO– groups of the oxidized CNF and the Ca2+ increased the cross-linking density and reduced the swelling capacity of the aerogels [32]. The cross-linking thus decreases the dimensional changes of the 3D printed structure compared with the non-cross-linked samples. This limits the deformation of the structure and thus hinders further absorption of water.
As we have demonstrated, the wound dressings developed in this study can hold a large fraction of liquid, yet the structures were sufficiently solid to be applied as dressings, attaching and conforming easily to the surface of the skin without disintegrating (Figure 6). The quantified areas of the cross-linked dressings were 667, 612 and 519 mm2 for the dressings CNF, CNF_A20 and CNF_A40, respectively. Although, the alginate-containing dressings are more robust, these dressings had a larger tendency to shrink caused by the cross-linking with Ca2+. Based on the obtained results regarding moisture and water absorption, we propose an alginate content of 20 wt%, relative to the CNF content. This level seems to provide an adequate stability of the construct and also a good water and moisture absorption (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). The concentration of the CNF used in this study was 1 wt%. Less shrinkage can be expected when using CNF/alginate inks with higher concentration, which may be beneficial in the design of tailor-made wound dressing devices.
It is also worth to emphasize that TEMPO CNF from the same pulp fibers applied in this study (bleached kraft softwood pulp) has been proven to be non-cytotoxic [3], with interesting dose-dependent inhibition of bacterial growth [5] and has been extensively evaluated as a potential wound dressing material [4]. Additionally, TEMPO CNF from bleached sulfite softwood pulp in combination with Ca2+ (as cross-linking agent) has been evaluated in in vitro and in vivo testing, demonstrating the wound healing ability of CNF hydrogels [6,7,33].

4. Conclusions

Wound dressings with a great capacity to maintain large amounts of water can be manufactured by 3D printing of CNF-based inks. The addition of alginate to the CNF and the cross-linking with CaCl2 consolidated remarkably the structure of the porous constructs. The highest water absorption was measured in the structures composed of neat CNF. The ionic cross-linking reduced the water absorption of CNF from roughly 1800% to 400% depending on the alginate content and Ca2+ cross-linking. This study demonstrates the suitability of carboxylated CNF in combination with alginate as ink for 3D printing of porous constructs for wound dressing devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/3/65/s1, Figure S1: Alginate and CNF inks for 3D printing. Note that the alginates have a higher flowability compared to the CNF. Alginates with a concentration of 1–4 wt% flow easily to the bottom of the vial (lower panel). Alginate with 8 wt% concentration has a higher viscosity as exemplified in the lower panel, when the vials are placed upside-down. Due to the high zero-shear viscosity of the CNF sample (concentration: 0.9 wt%) the material keeps its shape even when the vial is place upside-down. Figure S2: 3D printing with alginate and CNF inks. (Left) 4 wt% alginate in water. (Middle) 8% Alginate in water. (Right) 0.9% CNF in water. Note that 8 wt% alginate is required to print with some resolution, compared with CNF that prints adequately with only 0.9 wt%. Photos acquired during the printing of the 4th layer. The size of the squares is 20 mm × 20 mm.

Author Contributions

Idea and supervision: G.C.-C.; Investigation: E.E., D.F. and G.C.-C., Draft preparation, reviewing and editing: G.C.-C., E.E. and A.R.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the European Commission for funding part of this work through the MANUNET III program (Project No. MNET17/NMCS-1204), MedIn Project Grant No. 283895, “New functionalized medical devices for surgical interventions in the pelvic cavity”. The COST Action (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) FP1405 is acknowledged for the STSMs granted to Eduardo Espinosa and Daniel Filgueira. The work was performed at the RISE PFI 3D printing lab.

Acknowledgments

Mirjana Filipovic and Johnny Kvakland Melbø (RISE PFI) are acknowledged for valuable laboratory assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamoun, E.A.; Kenawy, E.-R.S.; Chen, X. A review on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 8, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sood, A.; Granick, M.S.; Tomaselli, N.L. Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data. Adv. Wound Care 2014, 3, 511–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nordli, H.R.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Rokstad, A.M.; Pukstad, B. Producing ultrapure wood cellulose nanofibrils and evaluating the cytotoxicity using human skin cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nordli, H.R.; Pukstad, B.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Rokstad, A.M. Ultrapure Wood Nanocellulose—Assessments of Coagulation and Initial Inflammation Potential. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jack, A.A.; Nordli, H.R.; Powell, L.C.; Powell, K.A.; Kishnani, H.; Johnsen, P.O.; Pukstad, B.; Thomas, D.W.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Hill, K.E. The interaction of wood nanocellulose dressings and the wound pathogen P. aeruginosa. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1955–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Basu, A.; Hong, J.; Ferraz, N. Hemocompatibility of Ca2+-Crosslinked Nanocellulose Hydrogels: Toward Efficient Management of Hemostasis. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17, 1700236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Basu, A.; Heitz, K.; Strømme, M.; Welch, K.; Ferraz, N. Ion-crosslinked wood-derived nanocellulose hydrogels with tunable antibacterial properties: Candidate materials for advanced wound care applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Sui, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, C.; Wu, M.; Li, B.; Li, Y. A physically crosslinked polydopamine/nanocellulose hydrogel as potential versatile vehicles for drug delivery and wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 188, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shefa, A.A.; Amirian, J.; Kang, H.J.; Bae, S.H.; Jung, H.-I.; Choi, H.-j.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, B.-T. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of effectiveness of a novel TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-silk fibroin scaffold in wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 177, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Souza, S.F.; Mariano, M.; Reis, D.; Lombello, C.B.; Ferreira, M.; Sain, M. Cell interactions and cytotoxic studies of cellulose nanofibers from Curauá natural fibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 201, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bacakova, L.; Pajorova, J.; Bacakova, M.; Skogberg, A.; Kallio, P.; Kolarova, K.; Svorcik, V. Versatile Application of Nanocellulose: From Industry to Skin Tissue Engineering and Wound Healing. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saito, T.; Kimura, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Isogai, A. Cellulose Nanofibers Prepared by TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation of Native Cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2485–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, F.; Nordli, H.R.; Pukstad, B.; Kristofer Gamstedt, E.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Mechanical characteristics of nanocellulose-PEG bionanocomposite wound dressings in wet conditions. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 69, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Powell, L.C.; Khan, S.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Wright, C.J.; Hill, K.E.; Thomas, D.W. An investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth on novel nanocellulose fibre dressings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rees, A.; Powell, L.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Gethin, D.T.; Syverud, K.; Hill, K.E.; Thomas, D.W. 3D Bioprinting of Carboxymethylated-Periodate Oxidized Nanocellulose Constructs for Wound Dressing Applications. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bethke, K.; Palantöken, S.; Andrei, V.; Roß, M.; Raghuwanshi, V.S.; Kettemann, F.; Greis, K.; Ingber, T.T.K.; Stückrath, J.B.; Valiyaveettil, S.; et al. Functionalized Cellulose for Water Purification, Antimicrobial Applications, and Sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Safari, S.; van de Ven, T.G.M. Effect of Water Vapor Adsorption on Electrical Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Nanocrystalline Cellulose Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9483–9489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Syrový, T.; Maronová, S.; Kuberský, P.; Ehman, N.V.; Vallejos, M.E.; Pretl, S.; Felissia, F.E.; Area, M.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Wide range humidity sensors printed on biocomposite films of cellulose nanofibril and poly(ethylene glycol). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Milne, S.D.; Seoudi, I.; Al Hamad, H.; Talal, T.K.; Anoop, A.A.; Allahverdi, N.; Zakaria, Z.; Menzies, R.; Connolly, P. A wearable wound moisture sensor as an indicator for wound dressing change: an observational study of wound moisture and status. Int. Wound J. 2016, 13, 1309–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ford, S.; Despeisse, M. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Filgueira, D.; Holmen, S.; Melbø, J.K.; Moldes, D.; Echtermeyer, A.T.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Enzymatic-Assisted Modification of Thermomechanical Pulp Fibers To Improve the Interfacial Adhesion with Poly(lactic acid) for 3D Printing. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 9338–9346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, W.; Wang, X.; Sandler, N.; Willför, S.; Xu, C. Three-Dimensional Printing of Wood-Derived Biopolymers: A Review Focused on Biomedical Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5663–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gopinathan, J.; Noh, I. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater. Res. 2018, 22, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chinga-Carrasco, G. Potential and Limitations of Nanocelluloses as Components in Biocomposite Inks for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and for Biomedical Devices. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aarstad, O.; Heggset, E.B.; Pedersen, I.S.; Bjørnøy, S.H.; Syverud, K.; Strand, B.L. Mechanical Properties of Composite Hydrogels of Alginate and Cellulose Nanofibrils. Polymers 2017, 9, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heggset, E.B.; Strand, B.L.; Sundby, K.W.; Simon, S.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Syverud, K. Viscoelastic properties of nanocellulose based inks for 3D printing and mechanical properties of CNF/alginate biocomposite gels. Cellulose 2019, 26, 581–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Markstedt, K.; Mantas, A.; Tournier, I.; Martínez Ávila, H.; Hägg, D.; Gatenholm, P. 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose–Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1489–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boateng, J.S.; Matthews, K.H.; Stevens, H.N.E.; Eccleston, G.M. Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 2892–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, F.; Gracia, N.; McDonagh, B.H.; Domingues, F.C.; Nerín, C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Antimicrobial activity of biocomposite films containing cellulose nanofibrils and ethyl lauroyl arginate. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 12159–12170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Z.-S.; Wang, X.-M.; Han, Z.-P.; Zhao, M.-X.; Yin, L. Purification, antioxidant and moisture-preserving activities of polysaccharides from papaya. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2332–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, N.; Bruzzese, C.; Dufresne, A. TEMPO-Oxidized Nanocellulose Participating as Crosslinking Aid for Alginate-Based Sponges. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 4948–4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. De Vos, P.; De Haan, B.; Wolters, G.H.J.; Van Schilfgaarde, R. Factors influencing the adequacy of microencapsulation of rat pancreatic islets. Transplantation 1996, 62, 888–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Basu, A.; Celma, G.; Strømme, M.; Ferraz, N. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of the Wound Healing Properties of Nanofibrillated Cellulose Hydrogels. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 1, 1853–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Viscosity of the inks CNF, CNF_A20 and CNF_A40. Ten single measurements are included for each speed interval and for each sample.
Figure 1. Viscosity of the inks CNF, CNF_A20 and CNF_A40. Ten single measurements are included for each speed interval and for each sample.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g001
Figure 2. 3D printed gels. Note the relatively large lateral flow of inks CNF_A20 and CNF_A40. The target dimensions of the 3D printed structures were 20 mm × 40 mm.
Figure 2. 3D printed gels. Note the relatively large lateral flow of inks CNF_A20 and CNF_A40. The target dimensions of the 3D printed structures were 20 mm × 40 mm.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g002
Figure 3. A 3D printed CNF wound dressing cross-linked with CaCl2 (CNF_C50), and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of a region of five freeze-dried 3D printed constructs. The target dimension of the 3D printed CNF structure (upper left) was 20 mm × 40 mm.
Figure 3. A 3D printed CNF wound dressing cross-linked with CaCl2 (CNF_C50), and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of a region of five freeze-dried 3D printed constructs. The target dimension of the 3D printed CNF structure (upper left) was 20 mm × 40 mm.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g003
Figure 4. Moisture absorption curves for the different aerogels.
Figure 4. Moisture absorption curves for the different aerogels.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g004
Figure 5. Water absorption curves for the different aerogels.
Figure 5. Water absorption curves for the different aerogels.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g005
Figure 6. Wound dressings cross-linked with CaCl2 (50 mM). Note the relatively large shrinkage of the samples containing alginate. The target dimensions of the 3D printed structures were 20 mm × 40 mm.
Figure 6. Wound dressings cross-linked with CaCl2 (50 mM). Note the relatively large shrinkage of the samples containing alginate. The target dimensions of the 3D printed structures were 20 mm × 40 mm.
Bioengineering 06 00065 g006
Table 1. Composition of the inks for three-dimensional (3D) printing. CaCl2: calcium chloride.
Table 1. Composition of the inks for three-dimensional (3D) printing. CaCl2: calcium chloride.
SeriesAlginate (wt%)CaCl2 (mmol)
CNF *--
CNF_C50-50
CNF_C100-100
CNF_A10_C501050
CNF_A20_C502050
CNF_A30_C503050
CNF_A40_C504050
CNF_A10_C10010100
CNF_A20_C10020100
CNF_A30_C10030100
CNF_A40_C10040100
* The CNF concentration was 1 wt%.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop