Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Molecular Basis of Nanocalcium-Induced Health Regulation in Zebra Fish (Danio rerio)
Previous Article in Journal
Ultra-High Resolution 9.4T Brain MRI Segmentation via a Newly Engineered Multi-Scale Residual Nested U-Net with Gated Attention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Precision Medicine in Orthobiologics: A Paradigm Shift in Regenerative Therapies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration

1
Department of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
2
School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
3
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Optomechatronics, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
4
International PhD Program in Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
5
College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
6
Institute of Graduate Clinical Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
7
McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Bioengineering 2025, 12(10), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101015
Submission received: 19 May 2025 / Revised: 29 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 September 2025 / Published: 24 September 2025

Abstract

Collagen, which has osteoconductive potential, has been widely used as a scaffold material for bone repair and regeneration for more than the last three decades. Recently, collagen has been combined with other materials to produce collagen-based bone grafting materials with enhanced bone repair and regeneration capacities. However, varied results have been obtained with collagen-based grafting materials. Methods: To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the enhanced bone engineering capacity of these materials, we critically reviewed the current literature on the complex hierarchical structure and properties of native collagen molecules. Results: This review highlights the scientific challenge of manufacturing collagen-based materials with suitable properties and shapes for specific biomedical applications, particularly those related to bone repair and regeneration. Conclusions: This article sheds light on the interactions between collagen and cell receptor molecules to mediate biological pathways. In addition, this article clarifies the mechanisms of cell adhesion-mediated bone regeneration. The findings may guide future research on collagen-based biomaterials.

1. Introduction

Except in cases of bone defects caused by an accident, a surgery, or an injury, bone can repair itself by activating surrounding osteoprogenitor cells, leaving no residual scars. However, severe defects that are beyond the bone’s self-healing capacity can lead to bone nonunion, callus formation, and even permanent bone loss. Bone grafts are often used for repairing such defects.
Autologous bone grafting is the gold standard for repairing severe bone defects. Autologous grafts facilitate the repair or regeneration of bone tissue through the differentiation and proliferation of adjacent or transplanted osteoblasts. These grafts are associated with a low risk of rejection, and due to their low antigenicity, the grafts can promote bone regeneration [1]. However, autologous bone grafting has some major disadvantages, such as poor osseointegration with artificial joints or tooth implants. Excessive bone constriction may occur when the defect exceeds 9 cm or when the surrounding tissues fail to provide a sufficient blood supply due to scarring, infection, or irradiation [2]. Moreover, autologous grafting involves the sacrifice of healthy bone tissue at the donor site, resulting in additional morbidity [3]. Harvesting bone from appropriate donor sites requires a complex learning curve and may lead to postoperative complications.
In addition to autologous bone grafts, alternative grafts such as allogenous grafts, xenografts, and allografts are also used for bone repair. These alternative grafts exhibit various physicochemical characteristics and varying reliability in surgical treatments [4,5]. Among all alternative grafts, collagen-based bone grafting materials are widely used in clinical settings. These materials are produced by combining collagen with other materials, thereby increasing bone repair and regeneration capacities.
Bone is a hard connective tissue with a hierarchical structure composed of matrix, cells, and bioactive factors. The bone matrix is mainly composed of type I collagen and hydroxyapatite (HAP). Collagen fibers serve as a template for mineralization and play key roles in determining specific properties, such as compressive and shear behaviors, fracture mode, and toughness, as well as reinforcing bone under external stress from applied loads [6,7].
Osteoblasts are anchorage-dependent cells. Therefore, the initial adhesion of osteoblasts to the biomaterial scaffold is pivotal for their migration, differentiation, proliferation, and subsequent bone formation. The adhesion of cells to the biomaterial surface is a complex process involving cell attachment, cell spreading, and cell–scaffold interaction; this process is called focal adhesion.
Collagen is the most abundant protein, constituting more than one-third (by weight) of the body’s total protein content [8]. Collagen preserves a unique hierarchical structure, constituting a major part of the bone extracellular matrix (ECM) [9]. Type I collagen is the most common type of collagen ECM, particularly in bone tissue [10]. The ECM plays vital roles in the morphogenesis and cellular metabolism of new tissues, conferring mechanical and biochemical properties [11]. The collagen matrix is essential for bone tissue engineering [12] because of its abundance, biocompatibility, high porosity, ability to combine with other materials, easy processing, hydrophilicity, low antigenicity, and absorbability [13,14]. It can promote cell adhesion, differentiation, and proliferation.
Recently, scientists have designed innovative collagen-based biomaterial scaffolds, leveraging the extensive evidence on collagen organization, structure, and properties. The use of these materials has considerably enhanced bone engineering. The design of resorbable collagen-based medical scaffolds requires knowledge of the anatomy and biological function of tissues or organs, as well as an understanding of the role of collagen’s physicochemical properties and structure in tissue or organ regeneration. Different collagen-based scaffolds have been developed for different bone engineering applications. These scaffolds promote biological responses, such as cell signaling, and serve as artificial biomimetic extracellular matrices that guide bone tissue regeneration. The initial step of bone regeneration involves the adhesion of cells to the collagen-based scaffold; the subsequent steps are material–tissue interaction, cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and new bone formation [15,16].
Given the substantial methodological heterogeneity across collagen-based scaffolds—spanning diverse fabrication techniques and inconsistent reporting of key material properties—this review aims to connect collagen–integrin focal-adhesion biology with concrete materials design choices that maximize osteogenesis. To do so, we will identify the most critical collagen–integrin pathways for bone formation, analyze how controllable scaffold variables modulate osteogenic markers, compare the biological and mechanical performance of major fabrication routes, and propose minimal reporting standards to enable robust cross-study synthesis. By clarifying these points, we can better identify optimal, clinically translatable designs. We begin in Section 2 by discussing the foundational mechanisms of cell adhesion, which are activated by the interaction between the collagen matrix and cellular integrins.

2. Mechanisms of Collagen Binding and Cell Adhesion

Integrin, a cell surface receptor, plays an essential role in regulating cell signaling, migration, survival, and adhesion to various ECMs, including collagen, fibronectin (FN), and laminin (LN) [17,18,19]. The arginine–glycine–aspartic acid (Arg–Gly–Asp [RGD]), a motif of collagen and fibronectin, constitutes a specific site for its recognition by integrin on cell surface, facilitating cell binding to the ECMs. Integrin, a family of α, β heterodimer, is a key regulator of cell–cell and cell–extracellular microenvironment communication.
Various ECM-binding integrins that facilitate the adhesion of osteoblasts on biomaterial surfaces have been identified. Six integrins play major roles in cell adhesion: α1β1, α2β1, α3β1, αVβ1, α5β1, and α11β1 (Geographic abstract A) [17,20,21,22].
Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that is activated upon integrin binding to the ECM at the site of focal adhesion [23]. Integrin-mediated adhesion at tyrosine 397 leads to the autophosphorylation of FAK, creating a binding site for the proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase (Src) homology 2 (SH2) domain of Src; the FAK–Src complex, in turn, phosphorylates other tyrosine residues in FAK, thus maximizing its kinase activity and creating additional protein-binding sites [24]. This active FAK–Src complex activates Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) by recruiting and phosphorylating the p130 Cas scaffold protein (p130 Crk-associated substrate, known as breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 [Bcar1]) [25]. The phosphorylated p130 Cas recruits Dock 180 and engulfment and motility 1 (ELMO1; a Ced-12 ortholog) by binding to v-crk (sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog crk; proto-oncogene, adaptor protein). The Dock 180-ELMO1 complex functions as an unconventional GEF for Rac1 and promotes the formation of membrane protrusions [26,27]. The activation of Rac1 and cell division cycle 42 (Cdc42) is also inhibited. This suppresses actomyosin contractility and enhances actin-mediated protrusion. The activity of Rac1 and Cdc decreases, whereas that of RhoA gradually increases, promoting the formation of stress fibers and the maturation of focal adhesion (Geographic abstract C) [28,29].
The FAK–Src complex also phosphorylates paxillin kinase linker (the GEF for Cdc and Rac1, which is also known as G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein 2 [GIT2], Pak-interacting exchange factor-beta [βPIX, also known as cloned out of library-1 [30], and Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 {Gef7}]). βPIX recruits and activates Rac1 through direct interactions with focal adhesions and membrane protrusions [31]. Notably, paxillin kinase linker and βPIX are phosphorylated by Src, which further modulates their activity in response to integrin-mediated adhesion [30,32]. Thus, integrin signaling through Src family kinases (SFKs) can regulate the localization and activity of GEFs, thereby controlling the formation of membrane protrusions.
The FAK–Src complex activates several pathways; subsequently, activated Rac and Cdc42 GTPases facilitate the formation of a membrane protrusion at the site of integrin binding in the early stages of cell spreading. Simultaneously, this complex, together with syndecans, mediates the suppression of actomyosin contractility by reducing the activity of RhoA. In the later stages of cell spreading, integrins promote the activity of several GEFs, leading to a shift in the balance between RhoA and Rac1 activity in favor of RhoA activity, thereby enhancing RhoA-mediated actomyosin contractility. The integrin α5β1 is particularly efficient in promoting the second phase of cell spreading, which may involve the force-induced activation of SFKs.
The enhanced activity of FAK promotes RhoA activity, thereby promoting cellular contractility through ROCK. Crosstalk between RhoA–ROCK and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway induces the phosphorylation of p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/ERK2) through MAPK kinase (MEK), which regulates the activity of the osteogenic transcription factor runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2). RUNX2 controls the expression of osteogenic genes such as osteocalcin (OCN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and bone sialoprotein, ultimately driving differentiation toward mature osteoblasts (Geographic abstract D) [33].

3. Collagen-Based Materials

Collagen-based materials promote the differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells into osteoblasts [34]. The collagen matrix, combined with other ECM or materials, also enhances cell differentiation and proliferation. Other ECMs or materials include LN [35], FN [36,37], chitosan (CS) [38], HAP [39,40,41], calcium phosphate cement (TCP), hydrogel [42], fibrin, and fibrinogen [43]. Collagen-based materials are also applied as a coating on implants to enhance osteoblast adhesion to the implant surface and osseointegration between bone and the implant [44,45,46,47,48,49]. The techniques and mechanisms are described in the following sections and Table 1.

3.1. Orientation of Collagen Fibers

The orientation of collagen-coated poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA)/poly-caprolactone (PCL) fibers was reported to enhance bone regeneration through cell adhesion. Chen et al. demonstrated that adipose-derived stem cells exhibited the highest expression of adhesion-related genes, such as those encoding integrin β1, cadherin 11, Fn-1, LN, and N-cadherin [50]. Electrospinning technology was used to fabricate collagen/HAP fibers to improve bone regeneration [51]. Collagen/HAP fibers support cell adhesion and bone regeneration. Yuanyuan Zhou et al. produced collagen/HAP composite fibers through electrospinning, and after 6 days of culture, the composite fibers exhibited higher viability and ALP activity than myeloma cells [52].

3.2. LN

Selective cell retention has been widely used as a bone tissue engineering technique. LN is a main component of the ECM and the basement membrane. LN plays a key role in mediating cell–matrix adhesion, leading to cell proliferation and differentiation [34,35]. A collagen-binding domain (CBD) containing the core functional amino acid sequences of LN-4 (CBD-LN peptide) was introduced on the functional surface of a collagen-based decalcified bone matrix scaffold. The decalcified bone matrix/CBD-LN scaffold maintained osteoblast proliferation and induced osteogenic differentiation through early cell adhesion mediated by upregulated integrin β1 expression [35]. In tissue engineering, bioactive molecules have been introduced into three-dimensional porous scaffolds to mimic the in vivo microenvironment.

3.3. FN

FN is an ECM glycoprotein with a size ranging from 230 to 270 kDa. The dimer is formed by α and β subunits. FN includes types I, II, and III domains. The type III domain is the most sensitive to unfolding. Several receptors can bind to FN—for example, α2β1, α3β1, αvβ1, and α5β1—and improve focal adhesion, cell proliferation, and cell migration [53]. FN combined with type I collagen can promote focal adhesion, as evidenced by elevated filopodium formation, increased cell circularity, and accelerated spreading in the mesenchymal stromal cell line [36]. Coating FN combined with OCN on the collagen matrices enhanced the adhesion of osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) and the mRNA levels of osteogenic markers, such as RUNX2, ALP, and collagen type I, in these cells [37].

3.4. Ceramic and Combined Materials

In a previous study, a hybrid scaffold composed of granular HAP and collagen was designed to mimic the microenvironment for the adhesion, viability, and osteoinduction of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) [54,55].
Moreau et al. reported that collagen incorporated into calcium phosphate bone cement increased the attachment and osteogenesis of osteoblasts [56]. Gutierrez et al. [57] proved the adhesion activity of HAP. The nano apatite–collagen composite appeared more similar to natural bone in terms of biomimetics than nano apatite cement without collagen [44,56,58]. Functionally graded CO3 apatite–collagen containing magnesium (FGMg-Ap-collagen) was also reported to enhance osteoblast adhesion to apatite and to promote bone formation [59]. CS combined with collagen/HAP in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [60] and rats [61], and collagen/β-TCP in the human osteoblast cell line MG63 [62], increased cell adhesion and proliferation, resulting in osteogenesis.
Yu et al. reported that intrafibrillar mineralized Col-HA-based scaffolds, constructed with either cellular or lamellar microstructures, exhibited enhanced bone regeneration capacity in a mouse model. Moreover, Fe/Mn incorporation promoted the osteogenic potential of the lamellar scaffolds, facilitating the in vitro osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and the in vivo bone regeneration in the presence of fresh bone marrow cells [63].

3.5. CS

CS, a nontoxic natural polymer, is primarily composed of 1,4-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-glucosamine units. CS exhibits high solubility in dilute acidic solutions with a pH < 6.5 [64]. This polymer forms covalent bonds with FN, improving cell adhesion [65]. CS binding to collagen/HAP or CS/collagen/β-TCP leads to the formation of a three-dimensional structure enhancing cell adhesion and proliferation, then resulting in osteogenesis [61,62]. Osteoblast adhesion increases with increasing β-TCP and CS contents [62,66].

3.6. Fibrin and Fibrinogen

Fibrin is widely used for enhancing the focal adhesion of collagen [67]. Santos et al. reported that the combination of collagen sponge and fibrin glue exerted hemostatic effects and ensured more favorable bone formation than collagen sponge only [67,68]. B.-S. Kim et al. found that type I collagen-derived atelocollagen/fibrin composite gel, combined with an optimal concentration of fibrinogen, supported human MSC growth in vitro and bone formation in vivo [69].

3.7. Cytokines and Chemokines

Cytokines or chemokines, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), chemotactic cytokine ligand (CXCL)12, and CXCL13, can enhance cell adhesion to the scaffold. Osteoblast adhesion to collagen or collagen-based materials leads to increased cell proliferation. In a previous study, BMP4 was immobilized in a CBD and bound to the collagen–polyglycolic hybrid scaffold; the BMP-immobilized hybrid scaffold supported the adhesion and proliferation of MSCs [70].
Claude Laflamme et al. revealed that a mixture of BMP-2/BMP-7 homodimers enhanced osteoblast adhesion and growth following culture on a collagen scaffold. Osteoblast adhesion and proliferation increased 4 days after culture on the collagen scaffold. BMP-2/BMP-7 promoted bone regeneration through different mechanisms involving interleukin-6 and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors [71].
Sylvia Weeks et al. reported that the incorporation of the chemokines CXCL12 and CXCL13 into a poly-L-lactic acid–collagen-based scaffold increased cell adhesion. Combining CXCL12 with an FN- and collagen-coated scaffold increased MSC adhesion to the scaffold through α4 and α5β1 binding [72]. This scaffold promoted the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts, resulting in bone formation.

3.8. Small Molecules

Grafting collagen with other materials to fabricate a scaffold is an effective strategy for enhancing cell proliferation and ALP expression [73]. Collagen can improve cell adhesion because of the presence of its Pro-α3(V) chain in bone. Through the N-terminal peptide of this chain, collagen adheres to osteosarcoma cells [74]. OCN, a small bone ECM protein, accelerated bone formation in a rat model when added to HAP/collagen composites. Histological findings indicate that OCN activates both osteoblasts and osteoclasts during early bone formation [39].

3.9. Implants

Collagen is widely used to coat biomedical implants. Geissler and Hempel et al. reported that the collagen type I coating of Ti6Al4V promoted the initial adhesion of osteoblasts in the presence of fetal calf serum. Moreover, 60% to 90% of all osteoblasts adhered to collagen type I-coated surfaces, whereas 30% of the initial cell number remained adhered to uncoated surfaces. Collagen type I, which includes the RGD peptide, effectively promotes cell adhesion by interacting with α1β1 and α2β1 [45]. The type I collagen-coated Ti–6Al–4V alloy facilitated osseointegration and bone-to-implant contact [46].
Titanium-based implants exhibit osseointegration and are widely used in dental and orthopedic care. However, the cell growth and differentiation capacity on the surface of titanium-based implants are limited. To address these limitations, various functionalization strategies for titanium surfaces have been developed, for example, bioactivated coatings. One of the most used peptides for functionalizing biomaterials is a cell adhesion peptide containing the RGD sequence, which is found in collagen, FN, and bone sialoprotein. RGD peptide-enriched materials interact with integrin on the cell surface and can enhance the proliferation of osteoblasts and BMCs (bone marrow-derived stem cells) [47].
In dental care, zirconia is used to manufacture implants. To enhance implant compatibility, nano-HAP is first bound to the surface, and then type I collagen is immobilized on the surface. Compared with cases with no coating or with nano-HAP-only coating, cases with nano-HAP–collagen coating exhibited increased osteoblast attachment and spreading on the surface; higher osteoblast differentiation was confirmed by higher ALP activity and mineralization [48]. HAP and extensive collagen coating of an implant surface can facilitate cell attachment due to the presence of increased hydroxyl groups on the surface, which results in the formation of a low contact angle and the activation of carboxylic groups, which are beneficial for osteoblast adhesion and proliferation [49].
Across the reviewed studies, methodological heterogeneity is substantial: collagen scaffolds are fabricated via diverse routes (e.g., electrospinning, surface functionalization/coatings, and hybrid composites), and key design variables (collagen fraction, crosslinker chemistry, fiber alignment/porosity, and mineral content) are reported with inconsistent parameters. Nevertheless, a consistent signal emerges across platforms: collagen-based constructs enhance osteoblast adhesion and spreading, elevate early osteogenic readouts (e.g., ALP), and support bone formation.
Beyond preclinical and experimental studies, collagen-based bone grafting materials have already been translated into diverse clinical settings. In dental and maxillofacial surgery, collagen-containing composites like Bio-Oss® Collagen are widely used for socket preservation, ridge augmentation, and sinus floor elevation, demonstrating predictable bone regeneration and enhanced handling properties [75]. In orthopedics, collagen scaffolds—in combination with osteoconductive ceramics such as hydroxyapatite or β-tricalcium phosphate—support bone healing in non-union fractures and spinal fusion, leveraging their favorable biocompatibility and graft integration [76]. Recent advances further highlight the potential of collagen scaffolds engineered with novel functionalities, such as piezoelectric properties to promote osteoinduction [77], and their integration with 3D printing technologies to improve biomechanical performance and clinical applicability [78]. Moreover, the exploration of alternative sources, including marine-derived collagen, offers new opportunities for sustainable and safe biomaterial development in bone tissue repair [79]. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including achieving optimal degradation rates, maximizing mechanical strength, and enabling tailored, patient-specific scaffold designs to improve long-term outcomes.
Despite extensive progress in the development of collagen-based scaffolds for bone regeneration, several limitations remain to be addressed before their widespread clinical translation. Collagen-based scaffolds have shown remarkable promise in bone regeneration due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and ability to mimic the native extracellular matrix. However, their clinical translation still faces notable limitations, including insufficient mechanical strength for load-bearing applications, variability in degradation rates, and batch-to-batch inconsistency arising from natural sources. In addition, collagen alone provides limited osteoinductive capacity, often necessitating combination with bioactive ceramics, growth factors, or stem cells to achieve robust bone regeneration. Looking forward, the prospects for collagen-based scaffolds lie in advanced fabrication strategies—such as 3D bioprinting, nanostructure modification, and incorporation of signaling molecules—that can precisely tailor scaffold architecture and biological performance. Integration with smart biomaterials and controlled drug delivery systems further offers exciting opportunities to enhance osteogenic outcomes and support patient-specific, precision therapies in regenerative medicine.
Table 1. Studies on collagen-based grafting materials.
Table 1. Studies on collagen-based grafting materials.
CharacterizationTechnologyResultsArticle TitleAuthorsPublisher
Orientation
Alignment of collagen-based scaffold
Bone-mimetic-oriented (type I) collagen scaffolds
Using extrusion to obtain collagen and then fabricating the scaffoldHuman induced pluripotent stem cell-derived osteoblasts exhibited favorable responses to the collagen scaffolds, as confirmed by the actin structureSuperior alignment of human iPSC-osteoblasts associated
with focal adhesion formation stimulated by oriented collagen scaffold
Ryosuke Ozasa et al.
[34]
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
(June 2021)
Orientation
Collagen-based scaffold and PLGA, PCL through electrospinning
PLGA/PCL/type I collagen electrospun scaffolds
The electrospun scaffold made of polymer contained type I collagenUpregulated expression of adhesion-related genes (β1, Cadherin 11, and Fn-1), with ADSC adhesionEnhanced osteogenesis of ADSCs by the synergistic effect of aligned fibers containing collagen IChen et al.
[50]
ACS Applied Materials & Interferences
(October 2016)
Orientation
Collagen-based scaffold and HAP through electrospinning
Electrospinning of collagen/HAP fibrous composite
HAP mixed with type I collagenCells exhibited increased viability on the collagen/HAP composite nanofibersGreener synthesis of electrospun collagen/
hydroxyapatite composite fibers with an excellent microstructure for bone tissue engineering
Yuanyuan Zhou et al.
[52]
International Journal of Nanomedicine
(April 2015)
Orientation
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/CS scaffolds with collagen
Immersed scaffold in a solution containing type I collagenCell adhesion efficiency increased by approximately 1.2-fold; promotion of stem cell differentiation into osteoblastsEffect of surface-modified collagen on the adhesion, biocompatibility
and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells in
poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/CS scaffolds
Yung-Chih Kuo et al.
[14]
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(October 2010)
Laminin
Collagen-based scaffold and laminin
Collagen-based decalcified bone matrix scaffold modified with laminin α4
Collagen-binding domain (CBD) containing laminin alpha 4 on the scaffoldPromotion of early cell adhesionLaminin alpha 4 promotes bone regeneration by facilitating cell
adhesion and vascularization
Yong Tang et al. [35]Acta Biomaterialia
(March 2021)
Fibronectin
Fibrillar complexes based on collagen type I and fibronectin
Fibronectin solution was added to the collagen solution; then, KH2PO4 was added to form fibril shapesMSCWJ-1 cells were elongated and had increased area on the composite fibril, which was confirmed by the actin cytoskeletonThe structural interactions of molecular and fibrillar collagen type I with fibronectin and its role in the regulation of mesenchymal stem cell morphology and functional activityYuliya Nashchekina et al.
[36]
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
(October 2022)
Fibronectin
Fusion protein, human OCN (hOCN) with FNIII9–10 combines with collagen
rhOCN/FNIII9–10
was crosslinked with collagen to form the matrix
rhOCN/FNIII9–10-functionalized collagen matrix increased not only the adhesion but also the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cellsOsteocalcin/fibronectin-functionalized collagen matrices for bone tissue engineeringKim S. et al.
[37]
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, (October 2015)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold with silicon and HAP
Silicon, collagen, and HAP
Silicon, collagen, and HAPAfter 7 days, osteoblasts exhibited similar interaction with the scaffold and bovine boneAnalysis of in vitro osteoblast culture on scaffolds for future
bone regeneration purposes in dentistry
Sandra J. Gutie’rrez-Prieto et al.
[57]
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
(2019)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold and a mixture of tetracalcium
phosphate and dicalcium phosphate
anhydrous
Calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC) with type I bovine collagen
CPC powder mixed with collagen powderTwo-fold increase in osteoblast attachmentSelf-setting collagen-calcium phosphate bone cement: Mechanical and cellular propertiesJennifer L. Moreau et al.
[56]
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
(July 2008)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold and FGMgCO3Ap
FGMgCO3Ap and atelocollagen composite pellet
FGMgCO3Ap mixed with atelocollagenOsteoblast-like cells adhered more effectively to the composite than to the Ti plateAction of GMgCO3Ap-collagen composite in promoting
bone formation
Y. Yamasaki et al.
[59]
Biomaterials
(May 2023)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold with CS and HAP
Collagen/CS sponges (composed of collagen, CS, and HAP)
Homogenization of the collagen gel, CS gel, and HAPCollagen coating
and RGD coating exhibited good compatibility
Use of collagen/CS sponges mineralized with hydroxyapatite for
the repair of cranial defects in rats
M.A.S. Munhoz et al.
[61]
Injury
(September 2018)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold with
HA
Collagen–HAP scaffold combined with Fe2+ or Mn2+ ions
The scaffolds made of poly(acrylic acid) and type I collagen and then substituted with Fe2+ or Mn2+ were shaped as a disc piece whose diameter and thickness were 5.5 and 1 mm, respectivelyMC3T3 cells exhibited viability and attachment when collagen was used; the parameters improved when Mn2+ and Fe2+ were added, as confirmed by the formation of pseudopodiaIntrafibrillar mineralized collagen-hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone regenerationLe Yu et al.
[63]
ACS Applied Material & Interfaces
(December 2020)
Ceramic and combined materials
Collagen-based scaffold with
HAP
Collagen–hemostat and granular HAP scaffold
The scaffold was prepared by mixing granular HAP and collagen
hemostat and then dried overnight
After 21 days, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells exhibited higher growth on the scaffold and exhibited high viability and cytoskeleton structure as the cell attachmentEnhanced osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by a hybrid HAP/collagen scaffoldElisa Mazzoni et al.
[55]
Frontiers in Cell and Develop Bio (January 2021)
CS
Collagen-based scaffold with
β-TCP and CS
Collagen, β-tricalcium phosphate, and CS matrix
Different ratios of CS and β-TCP formed with collagenComposite made of β-TCP/collagen led to enhanced cell adhesion and mechanical propertiesBioactivity and mechanical properties of collagen composite membranes reinforced by CS and β-TCPSang-Bae Lee et al.
[62]
Society For Biomaterials
(April 2012)
Fibrin and fibrinogen
Collagen-based fibrin
Fibrin–collagen sponges
A fibrin–collagen sponge was immersed in fibronectin–gelatin solution to generate fibrinFavorable cell attachment and increased ALP activityImprovements of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation
in vitro via fibrin network formation in collagen sponge scaffold
Beom-Su Kim et al. [67]J Biomedical Materials Research Part A
(July 2013)
Fibrin and fibrinogen
Collagen-based scaffold with fibrin glue–modified collagen sponge
Fibrin glue composed of human fibrinogen, aprotinin, and thrombinThe sponge promoted new bone formation in a rat model of calvarial bone defectEffect of collagen sponge and fibrin glue on bone repairThiago de Santana SANTOS et al. [68]J Appl Oral Sci.
(September 2015)
Cytokine and chemokine
Collagen-based scaffold and PLGA with BMP-4
Bone morphogenetic protein-4 immobilized in a collagen–PLGA hybrid scaffold
PLGA was crosslinked to type I collagen and then immersed in BMP-4Mesenchymal stem cells adhered to the scaffold and exhibited uniform distribution on the scaffold with BMP-4Spatial immobilization of bone morphogenetic protein-4 in a collagen-PLGA
hybrid scaffold for enhanced osteoinductivity
Hongxu Lu et al.
[70]
Biomaterials
(June 2012)
Cytokine and chemokine
Collagen-based scaffold with BMP-2 and BMP-7
CollaTape scaffolds
CollaTape (taken from bovine deep flexor [Achilles] tendon)The collagen scaffold with BMP-2/BMP-7 promoted osteoblast adhesionEffect of BMP-2 and BMP-7 homodimers and a mixture of BMP-2/BMP-7 homodimers on
osteoblast adhesion and growth following culture on a collagen scaffold
Claude Laflamme et al.
[71]
Biomedical Materials
(February 2008)
Cytokine and chemokine
Collagen-based scaffold with PLLA and chemokines
Type IV collagen and some chemokines were coated on the scaffold made of PLLA
PLLA-coated coverslips were incubated with fibronectin, type IV collagen, or heparin with chemokines (CXCL12 and CXCL13)Combined CXCL12 and collagen enhanced cell adhesion compared with the outcomes noted with collagen aloneThe effects of chemokine, adhesion and extracellular matrix molecules on binding of mesenchymal stromal cells to poly(L-lactic acid)SYLVIA WEEKS et al.
[72]
Cytotherapy
(May 2012)
Small molecule
Collagen-based scaffold and HAP with osteocalcin
HAP/collagen composites help in the secretion of osteocalcin in the scaffold or electrospinning
Nanocrystalline HAP implants contained 2.5% type I collagen/graphene oxide, HAP combined with collagenThe expression of adhesion proteins (osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and CD44) increased; electrospinning-coated alloys increased cell adhesion and viabilityOsteocalcin enhances bone remodeling around
hydroxyapatite/collagen composites; novel hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/collagen bioactive composite coating on Ti16Nb alloys by electrodeposition
Stefan Rammelt et al. and Yılmaz, E. et al.
[39,40]
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
(March 2005);
Materials Science and Engineering: C
(2019)
Small molecule
Collagen-based scaffold and PLGA, HAP with BMP-4
Nano-HAP–poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)–collagen biomaterial
Multistep polymerization and fabrication processIncreased cell proliferation and ALP expressionMechanical properties and osteogenic potential of
Hydroxyapatite-PLGA-collagen biomaterial for bone
regeneration
Didarul B. Bhuiyan et al. [73]Journal of Biomaterials Science
(May 2016)
Implant
Collagen was coated on the alloy
Collagen type I coating of Ti6Al4V
Ti6Al4V alloy coated with type I collagenThe alloy coated with type I collagen enabled osteoblasts to attach better and faster; they were recognized by integrins α1β1 and α2β1Collagen type I coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblastsGeißler et al.
[45]
J Biomed Mater Res
(2000).
Implant
Collagen was coated on the alloy
Ti–6Al–4V alloy combined with collagen
Ti–6Al–4V alloy coated with type I collagenThe alloy coated with type I collagen led to high levels of new bone formationAn alternative ex vivo method to evaluate the osseointegration of
Ti–6Al–4V alloy also combined with collagen
Francesca Veronesi et al.
[46]
Biomedical Materials
(February 2021)
Implant
Collagen crosslinked to alloy
Collagen crosslink
on titanium (Ti6Al4V) surfaces
Different crosslinkers (EDC/NHS, riboflavin, and lysyl oxidase) were used for coupling the collagen with the alloyCells exhibited favorable attachment to the material surface modified by crosslinkers, which was confirmed through immunofluorescenceTransglutaminase enables highly hydrolytically and proteolytically stable crosslinking of collagen
on titanium surfaces and promotes osteogenic
differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells
Alena L. Palkowitz et al.
[47]
Society For Biomaterials
(December 2023)
Implant
Collagen was immobilized on the alloy
Zirconia dental implants coated with collagen
Coating the surface with nano-HAP and then immobilizing type I collagen on itCompared with cases with no coating and with nano-HAP-only coating, those with nano-HAP–collagen coating exhibited increased osteoblast attachment, spreading, mineralization, and differentiationBioactive surface of zirconia implant prepared by nano-hydroxyapatite and type I collagenHun Kim et al. [48]Coatings
(September 2022)
Implant
Collagen was immobilized on alloy
Stainless steel (SS316L) immobilized with HAP, collagen on stainless steel (SS316L) with polydopamine
HAP and collagen immobilized on polydopamine and then grafted on the implant surfaceThe presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface, resulting in a low contact angle and carboxylic group activation, may be beneficial for osteoblast adhesion and proliferationSynthesis and characterization of collagen–hydroxyapatite immobilized on polydopamine grafted stainless steelZafirah Tapsir et al.
[49]
Surface and Coatings Technology
(January 2016)
Abbreviations: CS, chitosan; HAP, hydroxyapatite.

4. Conclusions

Over the last decades, extensive research has been conducted on collagen-based materials to improve their biological and mechanical properties for supporting efficient bone regeneration. Current advanced strategies are investigated in this review to figure out how to modify properties of materials in order to achieve a significant bone engineering.
This review integrates molecular cell adhesion mechanisms with materials science technology to advance the design of collagen-based scaffold for bone repair and regeneration, emphasizing that focal adhesion initiated by specific collagen–integrin interactions (e.g., α1β1, α2β1, α11β1) triggers downstream FAK–MAPK–RUNX2 signaling cascades, which regulate osteoblast differentiation and the expression of osteogenic genes such as ALP, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein. By linking these mechanistic pathways to scaffold design parameters, this work provides a unified framework for understanding and optimizing collagen-based biomaterials, with specific strategies including tailoring fiber orientation and surface chemistry to promote integrin-specific adhesion, hybridizing collagen with bioactive ceramics (e.g., HAP, β-TCP, FGMg-Ap) and polymers (e.g., chitosan, PLGA) to enhance mechanical stability and biological signaling, incorporating bioactive molecules such as BMPs, chemokines, and RGD-containing peptides to accelerate osteogenesis, and functionalizing implant surfaces with collagen-based coatings to improve osseointegration.
Despite substantial advances, key research gaps remain, including the need for high-throughput screening platforms to evaluate integrin-specific scaffold responses, long-term in vivo validation of collagen–integrin-targeted designs, and scalable manufacturing processes that preserve collagen’s native hierarchical structure; addressing these challenges will accelerate the translation of next-generation collagen-based scaffolds into clinical practice. Overall, this review provides both a mechanistic synthesis and a set of actionable guidelines for scaffold design, offering value to researchers in biomaterials, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine and underscoring the promise of integrating molecular pathways with engineering principles to develop biomimetic scaffolds capable of reliably guiding bone regeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-S.H. and W.-F.T.L.; methodology, T.-S.Y.; software, C.-J.W.; validation, M.-S.H. and W.-F.T.L.; formal analysis, T.-S.Y.; investigation, W.-F.T.L.; resources, W.-F.T.L.; data curation, T.-S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-S.H.; writing—review and editing, J.F.B. and W.-F.T.L.; visualization, C.-J.W.; supervision, T.-S.Y.; project administration, C.-J.W.; funding acquisition, W.-F.T.L., T.-S.Y. and M.-S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

TSY was supported by the Ministry of Education (grant numbers DP2-TMU-112-O-04 and DP2-TMU-113-O-05) and the National Science and Technology Council (grant number NSTC114-2221-E-038-006), Taiwan.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the academic and science graphic illustration services provided by the TMU Office of Research and Development. They also acknowledge the English and layout editing services provided by MDPI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bharadwaz, A.; Jayasuriya, A.C. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 110, 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ndukwe, K.C.; Aregbesola, S.B.; Ikem, I.C.; Ugboko, V.I.; Adebiyi, K.E.; Fatusi, O.A.; Owotade, F.J.; Braimah, R.O. Reconstruction of mandibular defects using nonvascularized autogenous bone graft in nigerians. Niger. J. Surg. 2014, 20, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zimmermann, G.; Moghaddam, A. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury 2011, 42, S16–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Graziani, G.; Govoni, M.; Vivarelli, L.; Boi, M.; de Carolis, M.; Bianchi, M.; Sassoni, E.; Bignozzi, M.C.; Carnevale, G.; Marmi, F.; et al. A Comprehensive microstructural and compositional characterization of allogenic and xenogenic bone: Application to bone grafts and nanostructured biomimetic coatings. Coatings 2020, 10, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trajkovski, B.; Jaunich, M.; Müller, W.D.; Beuer, F.; Zafiropoulos, G.G.; Houshmand, A. Hydrophilicity, viscoelastic, and physicochemical properties variations in dental bone grafting substitutes. Materials 2018, 11, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weiner, S.; Wagner, H.D. THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 1998, 28, 271–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thula, T.T.; Rodriguez, D.E.; Lee, M.H.; Pendi, L.; Podschun, J.; Gower, L.B. In vitro mineralization of dense collagen substrates: A biomimetic approach toward the development of bone-graft materials. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 3158–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, P.; Wu, G. Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids 2018, 50, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, L.; Ren, Y.; Emmert, S.; Vučković, I.; Stojanovic, S.; Najman, S.; Schnettler, R.; Barbeck, M.; Schenke-Layland, K.; Xiong, X. The Use of Collagen-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lin, X.; Patil, S.; Gao, Y.G.; Qian, A. The bone extracellular matrix in bone formation and regeneration. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ferreira, A.M.; Gentile, P.; Chiono, V.; Ciardelli, G. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3191–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Bai, H.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, C.; Che, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2021, 210, 110049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leisten, I.; Kramann, R.; Ventura Ferreira, M.S.; Bovi, M.; Neuss, S.; Ziegler, P.; Wagner, W.; Knüchel, R.; Schneider, R.K. 3D co-culture of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen scaffolds as a model of the hematopoietic niche. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1736–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuo, Y.-C.; Yeh, C.-F. Effect of surface-modified collagen on the adhesion, biocompatibility and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells in poly (lactide-co-glycolide)/chitosan scaffolds. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 82, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kafi, M.A.; Aktar, K.; Phanny, Y.; Todo, M. Adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell on chitosan/collagen composite scaffold. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2019, 30, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Teixeira, B.N.; Aprile, P.; Mendonça, R.H.; Kelly, D.J.; da Silva Moreira Thiré, R.M. Evaluation of bone marrow stem cell response to PLA scaffolds manufactured by 3D printing and coated with polydopamine and type I collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2019, 107, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Popov, C.; Radic, T.; Haasters, F.; Prall, W.C.; Aszodi, A.; Gullberg, D.; Schieker, M.; Docheva, D. Integrins α2β1 and α11β1 regulate the survival of mesenchymal stem cells on collagen I. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mao, L.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Zou, J. The role of integrin family in bone metabolism and tumor bone metastasis. Cell Death Discov. 2023, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Castoldi, M.; Pistone, M.; Caruso, C.; Filanti, C.; Piccini, D.; Tacchetti, C.; Manduca, P. Osteoblastic cells from rat long bone II: Adhesion to substrata and integrin expression in primary and propagated cultures. Cell Biol. Int. 1997, 21, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kapp, T.G.; Rechenmacher, F.; Neubauer, S.; Maltsev, O.V.; Cavalcanti-Adam, E.A.; Zarka, R.; Reuning, U.; Notni, J.; Wester, H.-J.; Mas-Moruno, C.; et al. A comprehensive evaluation of the activity and selectivity profile of ligands for RGD-binding integrins. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, J.; Doyle, A.D.; Shinsato, Y.; Wang, S.; Bodendorfer, M.A.; Zheng, M.; Yamada, K.M. Basement membrane regulates fibronectin organization using sliding focal adhesions driven by a contractile winch. Dev. Cell 2020, 52, 631–646.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cifuentes, S.J.; Domenech, M. Heparin-collagen I bilayers stimulate FAK/ERK(1/2) signaling via alpha2beta1 integrin to support the growth and anti-inflammatory potency of mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2024, 112, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Salasznyk, R.M.; Klees, R.F.; Boskey, A.; Plopper, G.E. Activation of FAK is necessary for the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on laminin-5. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 100, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mitra, S.K.; Schlaepfer, D.D. Integrin-regulated FAK–Src signaling in normal and cancer cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chodniewicz, D.; Klemke, R.L. Regulation of integrin-mediated cellular responses through assembly of a CAS/Crk scaffold. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2004, 1692, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lafer, G.; Brugner, A. The effect of nutrient content on quality and storage losses of ‘Braeburn’ apples. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Foliar Nutrition of Perennial Fruit Plants, Meran, Italy, 11–15 September 2001; pp. 517–520. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiyokawa, E.; Hashimoto, Y.; Kobayashi, S.; Sugimura, H.; Kurata, T.; Matsuda, M. Activation of Rac1 by a Crk SH3-binding protein, DOCK180. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 3331–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huveneers, S.; Danen, E.H. Adhesion signaling–crosstalk between integrins, Src and Rho. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wan, Q.; Cho, E.; Yokota, H.; Na, S. Rac1 and Cdc42 GTPases regulate shear stress-driven β-catenin signaling in osteoblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 433, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, Q.; Baird, D.; Peng, X.; Wang, J.; Ly, T.; Guan, J.L.; Cerione, R.A. Cool-1 functions as an essential regulatory node for EGFreceptor-and Src-mediated cell growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. ten Klooster, J.P.; Jaffer, Z.M.; Chernoff, J.; Hordijk, P.L. Targeting and activation of Rac1 are mediated by the exchange factor β-Pix. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brown, M.C.; Cary, L.A.; Jamieson, J.S.; Cooper, J.A.; Turner, C.E. Src and FAK kinases cooperate to phosphorylate paxillin kinase linker, stimulate its focal adhesion localization, and regulate cell spreading and protrusiveness. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 4316–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khatiwala, C.B.; Kim, P.D.; Peyton, S.R.; Putnam, A.J. ECM compliance regulates osteogenesis by influencing MAPK signaling downstream of RhoA and ROCK. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ozasa, R.; Matsugaki, A.; Matsuzaka, T.; Ishimoto, T.; Yun, H.S.; Nakano, T. Superior alignment of human iPSC-osteoblasts associated with focal adhesion formation stimulated by oriented collagen scaffold. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, Y.; Luo, K.; Tan, J.; Zhou, R.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Rong, Z.; Deng, M.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Laminin alpha 4 promotes bone regeneration by facilitating cell adhesion and vascularization. Acta Biomater. 2021, 126, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nashchekina, Y.; Nikonov, P.; Prasolov, N.; Sulatsky, M.; Chabina, A.; Nashchekin, A. The structural interactions of molecular and fibrillar collagen type I with fibronectin and its role in the regulation of mesenchymal stem cell morphology and functional activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, S.G.; Lee, D.S.; Lee, S.; Jang, J.H. Osteocalcin/fibronectin-functionalized collagen matrices for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2015, 103, 2133–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Przekora, A.; Benko, A.; Blazewicz, M.; Ginalska, G. Hybrid chitosan/β-1, 3-glucan matrix of bone scaffold enhances osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation via promotion of serum protein adsorption. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 045001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rammelt, S.; Neumann, M.; Hanisch, U.; Reinstorf, A.; Pompe, W.; Zwipp, H.; Biewener, A. Osteocalcin enhances bone remodeling around hydroxyapatite/collagen composites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2005, 73A, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yılmaz, E.; Çakıroğlu, B.; Gökçe, A.; Findik, F.; Gulsoy, H.O.; Gulsoy, N.; Mutlu, Ö.; Özacar, M. Novel hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/collagen bioactive composite coating on Ti16Nb alloys by electrodeposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 101, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Dai, Y.; Dong, Y.; Shao, M.; Lyu, F. Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Promote the Development of Bone Microtissues for Accelerated Bone Regeneration by Activating the FAK/Akt Pathway. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 4463–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cai, C.; Zuo, R.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, X.; EL-Newehy, M.; Abdulhameed, M.M.; Yuan, Z.; Mo, X.; et al. A costal-cartilage derived stem cell-laden prominin-1-derived peptide collagen hydrogel for angiogenesis and bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2025, 203, 256–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wei, M.; Tang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, K.; Wu, Z. Enhanced mechanical properties and anti-washout of calcium phosphate cement/montmorillonite composite bone-cement for bone-repair applications. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 35185–35197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, D.; Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Lin, K. The development of collagen based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Geissler, U.; Hempel, U.; Wolf, C.; Scharnweber, D.; Worch, H.; Wenzel, K. Collagen type I-coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 51, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Veronesi, F.; Torricelli, P.; Martini, L.; Tschon, M.; Giavaresi, G.; Bellini, D.; Casagranda, V.; Alemani, F.; Fini, M. An alternative ex vivo method to evaluate the osseointegration of Ti–6Al–4V alloy also combined with collagen. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 16, 025007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Palkowitz, A.L.; Rüger, S.; Ziegler, M.; Buhl, E.M.; Fischer, H. Transglutaminase enables highly hydrolytically and proteolytically stable crosslinking of collagen on titanium surfaces and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2024, 112, 812–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, H.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, N.K.; Kang, I.K. Bioactive surface of zirconia implant prepared by nano-hydroxyapatite and type I collagen. Coatings 2022, 12, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tapsir, Z.; Saidin, S. Synthesis and characterization of collagen–hydroxyapatite immobilized on polydopamine grafted stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 285, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, H.; Qian, Y.; Xia, Y.; Chen, G.; Dai, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, F.; Gu, N. Enhanced osteogenesis of ADSCs by the synergistic effect of aligned fibers containing collagen I. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29289–29297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ghorai, S.K.; Roy, T.; Maji, S.; Ray, P.G.; Sarkar, K.; Dutta, A.; De, A.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Dhara, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. A judicious approach of exploiting polyurethane-urea based electrospun nanofibrous scaffold for stimulated bone tissue regeneration through functionally nobbled nanohydroxyapatite. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Liu, Q. Greener synthesis of electrospun collagen/hydroxyapatite composite fibers with an excellent microstructure for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 3203–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Parisi, L.; Toffoli, A.; Ghezzi, B.; Mozzoni, B.; Lumetti, S.; Macaluso, G.M. A glance on the role of fibronectin in controlling cell response at biomaterial interface. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2020, 56, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ghorai, S.K.; Dutta, A.; Roy, T.; Guha Ray, P.; Ganguly, D.; Ashokkumar, M.; Dhara, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. Metal Ion Augmented Mussel Inspired Polydopamine Immobilized 3D Printed Osteoconductive Scaffolds for Accelerated Bone Tissue Regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 28455–28475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mazzoni, E.; Mazziotta, C.; Iaquinta, M.R.; Lanzillotti, C.; Fortini, F.; D’Agostino, A.; Trevisiol, L.; Nocini, R.; Barbanti-Brodano, G.; Mescola, A.; et al. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by a hybrid hydroxylapatite/collagen scaffold. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 8, 610570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Moreau, J.L.; Weir, M.D.; Xu, H.H. Self-setting collagen-calcium phosphate bone cement: Mechanical and cellular properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2009, 91, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gutiérrez-Prieto, S.J.; Perdomo-Lara, S.J.; Diaz-Peraza, J.M.; Sequeda-Castañeda, L.G. Analysis of in vitro osteoblast culture on scaffolds for future bone regeneration purposes in dentistry. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 2019, 5420752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Przekora, A.; Ginalska, G. Biologically Inspired Collagen/Apatite Composite Biomaterials for Potential Use in Bone Tissue Regeneration—A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 1748. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yamasaki, Y.; Yoshida, Y.; Okazaki, M.; Shimazu, A.; Kubo, T.; Akagawa, Y.; Uchida, T. Action of FGMgCO3Ap-collagen composite in promoting bone formation. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4913–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ou, K.L.; Wu, J.; Lai, W.F.; Yang, C.B.; Lo, W.C.; Chiu, L.H.; Bowley, J. Effects of the nanostructure and nanoporosity on bioactive nanohydroxyapatite/reconstituted collagen by electrodeposition. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 92A, 906–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Munhoz, M.A.S.; Hirata, H.H.; Plepis, A.M.G.; Martins, V.C.A.; Cunha, M.R. Use of collagen/chitosan sponges mineralized with hydroxyapatite for the repair of cranial defects in rats. Injury 2018, 49, 2154–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, S.-B.; Kwon, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-K.; Kim, K.-M.; Kim, K.-N. Bioactivity and mechanical properties of collagen composite membranes reinforced by chitosan and β-tricalcium phosphate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2012, 100, 1935–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, L.; Rowe, D.W.; Perera, I.P.; Zhang, J.; Suib, S.L.; Xin, X.; Wei, M. Intrafibrillar mineralized collagen–hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 18235–18249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yi, H.; Wu, L.-Q.; Bentley, W.E.; Ghodssi, R.; Rubloff, G.W.; Culver, J.N.; Payne, G.F. Biofabrication with Chitosan. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 2881–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Custódio, C.A.; Alves, C.; Reis, R.; Mano, J. Immobilization of fibronectin in chitosan substrates improves cell adhesion and proliferation. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2010, 4, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Moutzouri, A.G.; Athanassiou, G.M. Insights into the alteration of osteoblast mechanical properties upon adhesion on chitosan. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 740726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, B.S.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, J. Improvements of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro via fibrin network formation in collagen sponge scaffold. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2013, 101, 2661–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Santos, T.D.S.; Abuna, R.P.F.; Almeida, A.L.G.D.; Beloti, M.M.; Rosa, A.L. Effect of collagen sponge and fibrin glue on bone repair. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2015, 23, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, B.-S.; Kim, H.-J.; Choi, J.-G.; You, H.-K.; Lee, J. The effects of fibrinogen concentration on fibrin/atelocollagen composite gel: An in vitro and in vivo study in rabbit calvarial bone defect. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2015, 26, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, H.; Kawazoe, N.; Kitajima, T.; Myoken, Y.; Tomita, M.; Umezawa, A.; Chen, G.; Ito, Y. Spatial immobilization of bone morphogenetic protein-4 in a collagen-PLGA hybrid scaffold for enhanced osteoinductivity. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 6140–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Laflamme, C.; Rouabhia, M. Effect of BMP-2 and BMP-7 homodimers and a mixture of BMP-2/BMP-7 homodimers on osteoblast adhesion and growth following culture on a collagen scaffold. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 3, 015008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Weeks, S.; Kulkarni, A.; Smith, H.; Whittall, C.; Yang, Y.; Middleton, J. The effects of chemokine, adhesion and extracellular matrix molecules on binding of mesenchymal stromal cells to poly (l-lactic acid). Cytotherapy 2012, 14, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bhuiyan, D.B.; Middleton, J.C.; Tannenbaum, R.; Wick, T.M. Mechanical properties and osteogenic potential of hydroxyapatite-PLGA-collagen biomaterial for bone regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2016, 27, 1139–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yamaguchi, K.; Matsuo, N.; Sumiyoshi, H.; Fujimoto, N.; Iyama, K.; Yanagisawa, S.; Yoshioka, H. Pro-α3 (V) collagen chain is expressed in bone and its basic N-terminal peptide adheres to osteosarcoma cells. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jain, G.; Blaauw, D.; Chang, S. A Comparative Study of Two Bone Graft Substitutes—InterOss® Collagen and OCS-B Collagen®. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Menini, M.; Canullo, L.; Iacono, R.; Triestino, A.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Savadori, P.; Pesce, P.; Pedetta, A.; Guerra, F. Effect of Different Graft Material Consistencies in the Treatment of Minimal Bone Dehiscence: A Retrospective Pilot Study. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Han, J.; Li, Z.; Du, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ge, S.; Liu, H.; Ma, B. Natural collagen scaffold with intrinsic piezoelectricity for enhanced bone regeneration. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 31, 101532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, B.; Yao, C.; Zhang, Y. Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: Materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects. Biomed. Eng. OnLine 2025, 24, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhai, X.; Geng, X.; Li, W.; Cui, H.; Wang, Y.; Qin, S. Comprehensive Review on Application Progress of Marine Collagen Cross-Linking Modification in Bone Repairs. Marine Drugs 2025, 23, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, M.-S.; Yang, T.-S.; Wang, C.-J.; Bowley, J.F.; Lai, W.-F.T. Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101015

AMA Style

Huang M-S, Yang T-S, Wang C-J, Bowley JF, Lai W-FT. Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration. Bioengineering. 2025; 12(10):1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Mao-Suan, Tzu-Sen Yang, Chia-Jung Wang, John F. Bowley, and Wen-Fu T. Lai. 2025. "Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration" Bioengineering 12, no. 10: 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101015

APA Style

Huang, M.-S., Yang, T.-S., Wang, C.-J., Bowley, J. F., & Lai, W.-F. T. (2025). Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration. Bioengineering, 12(10), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop