Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Skin Wound Healing with Biosheets Containing Somatic Stem Cells in a Dog Model: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Polyethylene-Glycol-Induced Water Potential on Methane Yield and Microbial Consortium Dynamics in the Anaerobic Degradation of Glucose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leveraging a 7-Layer Long Short-Term Memory Model for Early Detection and Prevention of Diabetes in Oman: An Innovative Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review

by
Seyed Mohammadrasoul Naeimi
1,
Shayan Darvish
2,
Bahareh Nazemi Salman
3,* and
Ionut Luchian
4
1
School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 4513956184, Iran
2
School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA
3
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 4513956184, Iran
4
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2024, 11(5), 431; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050431
Submission received: 12 March 2024 / Revised: 21 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 27 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare)

Abstract

:
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been recently introduced into clinical dentistry, and it has assisted professionals in analyzing medical data with unprecedented speed and an accuracy level comparable to humans. With the help of AI, meaningful information can be extracted from dental databases, especially dental radiographs, to devise machine learning (a subset of AI) models. This study focuses on models that can diagnose and assist with clinical conditions such as oral cancers, early childhood caries, deciduous teeth numbering, periodontal bone loss, cysts, peri-implantitis, osteoporosis, locating minor apical foramen, orthodontic landmark identification, temporomandibular joint disorders, and more. The aim of the authors was to outline by means of a review the state-of-the-art applications of AI technologies in several dental subfields and to discuss the efficacy of machine learning algorithms, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), among different types of patients, such as pediatric cases, that were neglected by previous reviews. They performed an electronic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Medline to locate relevant articles. They concluded that even though clinicians encounter challenges in implementing AI technologies, such as data management, limited processing capabilities, and biased outcomes, they have observed positive results, such as decreased diagnosis costs and time, as well as early cancer detection. Thus, further research and development should be considered to address the existing complications.

1. Introduction

Information technology has experienced significant advancements in recent years, leading to a dramatic surge in the volume of data. The need for processing large datasets, also known as “big data”, has led to an increasing demand for the application of artificial intelligence [1]. The term “artificial intelligence” (AI) was initially introduced by McCarthy in the 1950s and implied the concept of developing machines that can perform tasks typically carried out by humans [2,3]. AI refers to the ability of machines to simulate human intelligence and undertake intricate tasks like problem-solving, decision-making, and recognition of objects [4]. As a subset of AI, “machine learning” (ML) is expected to make remarkable contributions to clinical diagnosis due to its reasonable predictive accuracy. In addition, ML models can process data with diverse characteristics, which is a task beyond the scope of conventional analysis methods [5]. The connection between AI and medicine dates back to the 1970s when projects such as the Stanford University experimental computer for AI in medicine and the early-stage expert systems were launched [6]. Neural networks represent a specific category of machine learning algorithms. The network imitates the structure of the human brain by forming a computational network of cells arranged in a series of layers. “Deep learning” (DL) refers to multi-layered neural networks [7]. By improving performance on complex tasks in areas like image processing (e.g., object detection and facial identification) and sound processing, DL has taken human performance to new heights [8]. ML algorithms have facilitated clinical decision-making by aiding in the prognosis and diagnosis of various health conditions, representing the main areas of progress for AI in the medical field [4]. AI has found numerous applications in the medical field, ranging from radiology, dermatology, and neurology to ophthalmology, oncology, cardiology, genetics, emergency medicine, and drug design [9]. Other significant areas of healthcare, such as dentistry, have also adopted ML techniques. The integration of digitized imaging and electronic medical records in dental practice enables the implementation of virtual AI algorithms like support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and especially convolutional neural network (CNN) [10]. CNNs are the preferred choice for image classification due to their ability to automatically extract features through repeated convolution and pooling. This unique architecture, with multiple layers containing learnable filters, enables CNNs to excel in medical computer vision tasks, making them the preferred option for AI-driven computer vision applications in dental practice, which accounts for the majority of research conducted on AI in dentistry [11,12].
AI has been employed to identify and detect different variables from dental radiographs. Different measures are used to determine the overall diagnostic performance of AI in dental science, such as accuracy (the ratio of correctly classified samples to all samples), sensitivity (the probability of getting a positive outcome when the condition is present), and specificity (the probability of getting a negative outcome when the condition is not present). The reporting of a metric depends on the objectives and methodologies employed by researchers [13]. There have been several research studies examining the implementation of machine learning in dentistry, including the prediction of postoperative pain [14], periodontal bone loss measurement [15], the need for tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment [16], and the presence of root caries [17]. Recently, some reviews have been published about the implementation of AI in specific subfields of dentistry, such as orthodontics [18], radiology [7], and endodontics [19]. However, only a few studies have approached the application of AI in the broad spectrum of dental subfields, and there is a lack of comprehensive reviews covering different aspects of dental science at once. Children, unlike adults, tend to be more uncooperative during dental procedures, and managing child patients is typically more challenging than managing adults [20]. This poses challenges when repeating tasks such as dental radiographs. However, AI can aid practitioners in diagnosis, potentially minimizing the need for repeated procedures. Moreover, health organizations have advised routine dental screenings for children to prevent the development of dental problems like caries, which may not show symptoms in the initial stages [21]. Utilizing the computational capabilities of AI software, these screenings can be enhanced, and early detection of oral conditions can be facilitated. This study not only covers the general applications of AI in dentistry but also includes some of the recent implementations of AI in pediatric patients.
Considering the potential of AI for reducing costs and errors, decision-making, and diagnosis, this study aims to summarize AI-based technologies in various dental subfields and provide insight into this rapidly advancing healthcare domain (Table 1).

2. Materials and Methods

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using MeSH terms, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, pediatrics, and dentistry, from the inception of available data until February 2024 across online databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Medline. Additionally, non-MeSH terms such as implantology, cariology, VRF, and odontogenic were manually searched in combination with the aforementioned MeSH terms using Boolean operators in order to ensure the inclusion of appropriate papers. Papers with higher citation rates and those published in reputable journals within their respective fields were prioritized, aiming to include the most credible AI applications in dental practice. Non-English articles and incomplete papers were excluded. Preference was given to papers that emphasized the clinical application of AI in dentistry rather than focusing solely on theoretical aspects of AI algorithms. Ultimately, 84 papers were chosen as the most relevant for the purposes of this review.

3. Review

AI in dentistry excels at detecting bone loss and predicting pain in periodontics, diagnosing conditions like cleft palate in oral and maxillofacial surgery, designing dental arches in prosthodontics, and detecting implant systems and complications in implantology. It also aids in treatment planning in orthodontics and predicts plaque and treatment needs in pediatric dentistry and cariology. In the upcoming sections, we will explore AI applications in each field individually.

3.1. Applications of AI in the Field of Periodontics

Periodontal disease is a multifactorial condition that results from the inflammatory response of the host’s immune system to multiple bacterial species in the oral cavity [22]. Periodontitis ranks as the sixth most widespread disease globally, and it can cause periodontal bone loss (PBL). Hence, early detection of PBL, which can be a complex task for novice practitioners, is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of periodontitis [53]. Using a deep neural network on periapical radiographs from 63 patients, Danks et al. estimated the PBL and its severity with a combined accuracy of 83.3% [15].
Kim et al. used ML to estimate the level of periodontitis progression based on salivary samples. They collected mouthwash samples from 692 patients and measured the copy number of the nine most important bacterial species that cause periodontal disease. The input features for the ML algorithms (NN, RF, SVM, RLR) were the copy numbers of the pathogens [22]. Two studies compared different ML models to find the best-performing algorithm for detecting the most important factors in periodontal disease. They both demonstrated that the decision-tree model can identify the complex risk factors for PD with higher accuracy and sensitivity than other models [23,54].
AI can take multiple factors of periodontal disease into account for diagnosis with high accuracy, which can be a challenging and arduous task for dental practitioners. Therefore, with the help of ML, dentists can determine periodontitis sooner than before, prevent further complications, and decrease treatment costs for the patient.

3.2. Applications of AI in the Field of Endodontics

AI has been employed in endodontics to detect fractures and several other tooth characteristics, such as minor apical foramen, to increase successful treatment outcomes [55]. Root canal treatment (RCT) can result in postoperative pain, which is affected by various factors, and anticipating the pain is crucial for the planning of subsequent therapeutic schedules. Xin Gao et al. used an ANN model to predict postoperative pain after receiving RCT. The AI model was trained using input data such as medication during RCT, oral hygiene, gender, and age. The perceived pain was graded according to the patient’s subjective experience, and the final accuracy of the model was 95.60% [14]. Several studies have implemented ML methods to locate minor apical foramen and calculate working length. While placing the root filling material, instrumentation beyond the apical foramen should be avoided. Accurate measurement of the working length (WL) and limiting the placement of root-filling material only to the canal can prevent exacerbation of postoperative pain and reduce the periapical immune response to RCT material [55]. Saghiri et al. compared the accuracy of an ANN in finding the location of the minor apical foramen to the assessment done by endodontists (which was accurate in 76% of the teeth). Surprisingly, AI yielded a higher accuracy of 96% [24,55]. Vertical root fractures (VRFs) are a significant complication, accounting for 2% to 5% of crown/root fractures, and they may require either root resection or tooth extraction [19]. With early detection of VRFs, dentists can save other remaining roots. Fukuda et al. used a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect VRFs with a precision of 93% on three hundred panoramic radiographs, which included a total of 330 VRF teeth with clearly discernible fractures [25]. Moreover, recognizing the shape of the root canal can be extremely helpful in multiple endodontic treatments. Benyo et al. detected the medial axis of the root canal based on the fuzzy clustering method in order to provide a better understanding of the root morphology [26]. Molars have always been of great importance to endodontists. AI was utilized for the classification of mandibular third molars [27], prediction of third molar eruption [28], and recognition of molar root morphology [29].
In endodontics, AI contributes to treatment when it comes to detecting minute tooth characteristics’ alterations that can be hard to recognize for humans.

3.3. Applications of AI in the Field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

ML models have performed well in various surgical procedures, including orthognathic surgery, landmark detection, cyst and lesion detection, and osteoporosis classification. Orthognathic treatment aims to address both functional and aesthetic issues related to dentofacial deformities by utilizing a combination of orthodontic and surgical interventions. Research studies have been conducted on assessing the need for orthognathic surgery, evaluation of maxillary sinusitis, diagnosis of orthognathic surgery, and blood loss during surgery. Patcas et al. applied AI to evaluate the influence of orthognathic treatment on facial esthetics and estimated age. According to this study, 66.4% of the patients had improved appearance after the surgery [30].
Cleft palate (CP) and cleft alveolus (CA) are congenital conditions that create challenges for children and their families. Early surgical interventions to stabilize maxillary segments are typically done around ages 8–10. Panoramic radiography plays a vital role in evaluating cleft status. However, interpreting these images can be challenging for inexperienced radiologists. Kuwada et al. used panoramic radiographs from 383 children to create a DL model capable of identifying cleft alveolus (CA) and cleft palate (CP) that can assist clinicians in detecting clefts [31].
Kwon et al. developed a CNN model for automatic diagnosis of odontogenic cysts and tumors in the upper and lower jaws using panoramic radiographs. The CNN model was trained on both histopathological diagnoses from biopsies and clinical diagnosis by two radiologists with over 15 years of experience, resulting in a 95.6% accuracy rate in the classification of lesions [33]. Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder distinguished by a reduction in bone density and deterioration of bone architecture, leading to a higher risk of bone fractures and pain [56]. Several studies have used dental radiographs to classify mandibular bone density for early detection of osteoporosis. Alzubaidi et al. calculated the thickness and roughness of the mandibular cortical bone and employed a support vector machine (SVM) to categorize each Dental Panoramic Radiograph (DPR) into three groups based on the probability of osteoporosis [32]. The gold standard for the detection of oral lesions and diseases is based on histopathology, which can be invasive and time-consuming. In contrast, diagnosis with high-precision AI models is non-invasive and can vastly reduce treatment costs. Moreover, as Immanuel Kant has stated, aesthetic judgment is a subjective task and is prone to human error. Therefore, AI can help us achieve a universal standard for the assessment of post-surgery appearance without human bias.

3.4. Applications of AI in the Field of Prosthodontics

In prosthodontics, AI technology is still scarcely used. AI has been applied to computer-aided design and manufacturing systems, removable partial dentures, implant prosthetics, and orofacial anatomy [57]. Designing removable partial dentures (RPDs) is based on the classification of the dental arch as the first step. Takahashi et al. utilized a CNN to classify dental arches. A total of 1184 dental arch images were employed, with 748 images for the maxilla and 436 images for the mandible. The images were categorized into four types of dental arches: edentulous, complete dentition, arches with missing posterior teeth, and arches with limited edentulous space. The classification accuracy of the model was found to be 99.5% for the maxilla and 99.7% for the mandible [34].
To effectively plan dental treatments for patients, obtaining detailed information about the condition of their teeth and mouth is essential. A recent study conducted in 2021 utilized a DL approach to develop a method for identifying dental prostheses and restorations by analyzing 1904 oral photographic images of dental arches. This approach aimed to improve the accuracy and quality of intraoral data available for treatment planning purposes [35].

3.5. Applications of AI in the Field of Dental Implantology

For over half a century, dental implants have been utilized as a dependable long-term solution (with a success rate of over 90% lasting for more than ten years) with the purpose of replacing missing teeth [36]. However, mechanical and biological complications, such as screw loosening, fractures, low stability, and peri-implantitis, occur frequently [58].
Dental implant systems come in a wide variety, with over 4000 different types produced by several companies. Additionally, there is a variety of fixture structures available, including straight, tapered, conical, elliptical, trapezoidal, internal, and external, each having different surface treatment techniques such as machined, blasted, acid-etched, hydroxyapatite-coated, titanium plasma-sprayed, and oxidized [59]. Therefore, in case of failures, repair and follow-ups can become extremely complicated if dentists do not classify the implant system correctly. Several studies have developed ML models to identify dental implants and their brand names with high accuracy. The study conducted by Sukegawa et al. demonstrated the successful utilization of multi-task DL for developing a classifier that can categorize implant brands using dental panoramic radiographic images [36]. Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a significant contributor to dental implant failure. Zhang et al. employed ML algorithms that utilize the internal architecture of bone tissue to forecast the onset of significant marginal bone loss (MBL) in dental implants. The study used four different ML models, of which SVM produced the most accurate results, with an AUC of 0.967 [37].
Plaque accumulation causes peri-implantitis, an inflammatory disease, which can lead to bone loss around the insertion site of implants. In a cohort study conducted by Mameno et al., an ML-based model was developed to detect the onset of peri-implantitis. Three ML models were used to analyze the risk factors linked with the development of peri-implantitis. The AUC of the random forest model (the most precise model in this study) was 71% [38].
In the last decade, there have been incredible innovations and advancements in dental implantology. Despite its relatively recent widespread clinical implementation by dentists, AI has demonstrated potential in assisting clinicians to reduce the risk of failures and minimize the time required for repairs in case of failures.

3.6. Applications of AI in the Field of Orthodontics

The objective of orthodontic treatment is to restore individual normal occlusion and enhance facial aesthetics in patients with malocclusion [60]. The field of orthodontics has seen significant investments in research and development of AI technologies, with an estimated economic return of 3.6 billion dollars [9]. Decision-making is an integral part of orthodontics, and AI has opened new horizons in dentistry by providing multiple agile architectures with adequate precision and accuracy. Although the final diagnosis still must be made by dentists, ML can act as a potent auxiliary tool in the process of orthodontic treatment. Recent studies employing ML models in orthodontics focused on areas such as tooth segmentation, landmark identification, treatment planning, growth determination, the need for orthodontic extraction, and impact on face attractiveness.
Timing plays a vital role in orthodontic planning for growing patients [40]. It has been stated that clinical effects of the therapy are observed at the earliest in patients whose treatment commenced at the right time, i.e., during the peak growth period [61]. Determining the proper time to initiate treatment is based on the patient’s skeletal maturation and bone age [62]. The assessment of skeletal maturity is essential to carry out an effective treatment with the use of orthodontic appliances in children with class II malocclusion [61]. Kök et al. developed an ML model to determine growth by cervical vertebrae maturation stages. Seven AI classification algorithms were used on cephalometric radiographs from 300 children and adolescents aged between 8 and 17. ANN was the most stable algorithm in this study, with an accuracy of 55.6%–93% [40]. A necessary step in devising the optimal orthodontic treatment plan is the recognition of anatomic landmarks in radiographs, with the purpose of measuring various angles, distances, and ratios. Kunz et al. employed a CNN algorithm (using Keras & Google Tensorflow) to analyze cephalometric X-rays with a level of accuracy close to clinicians (considered the current gold standard) [41].
Another integral part of treatment planning is whether to perform extraction and to determine the teeth that should be extracted. Jung et al. collected lateral cephalograms from 156 patients and selected a two-layer neural network for ML. The overall success rate of the decision-making process between extraction and non-extraction was 93% [39].

3.7. Applications of AI in the Field of Forensic Dentistry

The process of forensic identification involves comparing the characteristics present in a sample of evidence to those of a known reference sample to draw conclusions about the source of the evidence [63]. Forensic odontology is a reliable method for identification based on robust dental traits [64]. Most AI-based studies in this area focused on person identification, classifying tooth types, and estimation of age using teeth.
Tooth detection and numbering in dental radiographs is one of the initial stages in most forensic odontology tasks. Leite et al. developed an AI-based tool that demonstrated improved speed and accuracy in detecting and segmenting teeth on panoramic radiographs compared to manual segmentation [42].
Nowadays, with the rise in crime, missing people, and natural disasters all over the world, human identification has become increasingly important [65]. Sathya et al. adopted the popular CNN architecture, AlexNet, to conduct human identification through dental radiographs in a two-stage process. In the classification stage, the neural network identifies the tooth number in the post-mortem query image (images taken after the candidate’s death). In the second stage, candidate matching is performed by comparing the query image with corresponding images in the ante-mortem database (images taken when the candidate was alive) [43].
Furthermore, teeth are considered to be useful biological indicators for estimating the age of an individual, as they can remain intact for an extended period of time after death. Farhadian et al. created a neural network age prediction model using the pulp-to-tooth ratio in canines. The model was trained on radiographs of 300 subjects between the ages of 14 and 60 years and was able to predict age with an acceptable mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.12 years [44].

3.8. Applications of AI in the Field of Cariology

Tooth decay, commonly known as dental caries, is a widespread and chronic condition that affects a considerable portion of the world’s population [66]. Dental caries is caused by three primary factors, which include microorganisms that produce acid, dietary carbohydrates, and host factors such as eating patterns [67]. Caries that are not treated in permanent teeth are now the most prevalent health issue worldwide, affecting 34.1% of the population, and can lead to various oral diseases [68]. AI models are particularly useful in predicting carious lesions early on to decrease further treatment needs. With the help of ML, caries can be detected and classified on different tooth surfaces.
Detecting dental caries at an early stage is crucial for providing appropriate prevention and treatment to patients with this condition [69]. Various studies utilized different input data types for their ML prediction models. Tamaki et al. developed a dental caries prediction model using data mining techniques. Their CNN model utilized several input variables, including salivary levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli, salivary pH, and the frequency of sweet snack consumption, resulting in a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.77 [45]. In 2020, a study was carried out in China to predict dental caries in the high-risk population of geriatric citizens. The study involved 1144 elderly patients, and a prediction model using a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) was created to determine the possibility of tooth decay. The results from the GRNN early warning model showed that cases with a history of toothache and tobacco use were more susceptible to dental caries [46].
Wang et al. studied the correlation between dental caries and genetics using logistic regression models. A comprehensive gene set analysis was performed for dental caries, and five gene sets were identified as potential factors for caries development [70].
The diagnosis and classification of carious lesions is also a difficult task. ML can help dentists to improve diagnosis as a reliable second opinion [71]. Neural networks and image processing techniques were used to detect caries on proximal and occlusal surfaces of teeth [71,72]. Moutselos et al. utilized a dataset of 88 dental images for training a DL model (Mask R-CNN) to detect and classify caries specifically on the occlusal surfaces of teeth, where caries is most commonly found inside the pits and fissures. The model attained an F-measure of 0.778 [47].

3.9. Applications of AI in the Field of Pediatric Dentistry

Pediatric dentistry contributes greatly to ensuring the proper nutrition and health of children in society by maintaining their ability to chew properly through the preservation of primary teeth [73]. Childhood caries and preadolescent abnormalities are among the most recent areas of interest for ML implementation. Untreated dental plaque on primary teeth can result in a variety of oral diseases, including caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis, which can have negative consequences on the growth and development of permanent dentition [74]. Detecting plaque on primary teeth can be challenging since distinguishing a small amount of plaque from the tooth is difficult. It requires assessment by a clinician, and when dealing with an uncooperative child, it becomes even more challenging. You et al. developed an AI model that successfully identified plaque on primary teeth with satisfactory accuracy using intraoral photos captured by an affordable digital camera, making it feasible for parents to use at home [48].
Park et al. identified risk factors such as sugar consumption and allergic disease for their early childhood caries (ECC) prediction models. Analysis of the data of 4195 children using ML-based models showed a favorable performance in predicting early childhood caries and high-risk groups for ECC [75].
The assessment of children’s oral health by clinicians is crucial for identifying their treatment requirements. However, clinical diagnosis is not universally feasible, and accessibility to it varies. Wang et al. employed machine learning to forecast children’s oral health treatment needs using sociodemographic factors like language, age, sibling count, dental insurance, and parental occupation. This method can be particularly beneficial in areas where children lack access to dental professionals since it is user-friendly for parents and school personnel [49].
The most common abnormality of supernumerary teeth is mesiodens, with a prevalence ranging from 0.15% to 1.9% [76]. Mesiodens can cause multiple complications, such as eruption disorders and crowding. Therefore, early detection of this abnormality in children is crucial for preventing such complications. A study by Ahn et al. utilized panoramic radiographs from 1100 children to classify mesiodens in primary or mixed dentition using DL models. The classification accuracy of ML models was found to be higher than 90% [50].
The main goal of most pediatric dentistry procedures is preventive dental care. Therefore, AI can have a great impact on improving oral health among future elderly populations.

3.10. Others

Modern dentistry emphasizes the utilization of minimally invasive procedures, leading to a recent increase in the adoption of lasers as a preferred alternative to traditional dental instruments [77]. Engelhardt et al. utilized an ML algorithm to classify reflected light spectra into different tissue types (e.g., bone, mucosa, nerve) in laser dentistry. The main objective was to provide a warning or temporarily halt the use of the laser when critical tissue was at risk of being removed. The model exhibited an average misclassification rate of 0.02, which can be deemed a crucial step toward enhancing the safety of laser surgery in the oral cavity [78].
AI-based computer-vision algorithms have become increasingly popular in recent years for automatically detecting and classifying dental restorations in panoramic radiographs. Abdalla-Aslan et al. designed an ML model that can detect different dental restorations in panoramic radiographs automatically. The study examined 738 dental restorations across 83 panoramic images and showed that the algorithm was able to detect 94.6% of the restorations, indicating the excellent performance of the model [51].
Osteoarthritis is characterized as a degenerative condition that can bring about significant changes in joint cartilage tissues, ultimately resulting in severe pain and impaired joint function [79]. Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) is an important subtype in the classification of temporomandibular disorders [80]. Choi et al. created an AI model to detect TMJOA on orthopantomograms (OPGs) by using CBCT results that have already been confirmed by experts. The DL model was able to match the sensitivity of an expert while achieving a more optimal trade-off between sensitivity and specificity [52]. A summary of the recent applications for AI can be found in Table 1.

4. Discussion

AI has revolutionized different dental specialties by providing agile and cost-effective models for clinical diagnosis and assessment of numerous oral diseases, promising a better future for healthcare systems around the globe.
The present study aimed to provide a thorough review of recent literature on the application of AI in various dental specialties. Because of its ability to recognize delicate and complex patterns from all sorts of databases (especially dental radiographs), AI can be particularly helpful in clinical dental practice in the near future. For instance, ML can aid in orthodontics by identifying local skeletal patterns from OPGs and lateral cephalograms in specific populations who share a common ancestry or are native to a particular geographic location. By doing so, the need for trial and error can be eliminated, and only the necessary treatments can be considered for that particular population. Another area in which AI shines brightly is cariology [81]. AI algorithms can discern tooth caries from other dental lesions in the oral cavity with acceptable precision. Dental caries is still one of the most widespread chronic diseases globally and left undetected, it can cause numerous oral diseases such as PBL. Therefore, automating caries detection from images by implementing AI-based image processing methods can reduce the financial burden of governmental healthcare sectors. Most importantly, the current study demonstrated recent applications of AI in pediatric dentistry, a very significant subfield that had been neglected in most reviews. The ever-growing costs and complications of dental treatment have made preventive dentistry a highly sought-after approach for authorities worldwide. Thus, by implementing ML methods on the gathered data from pediatric patients and detecting dental defects early on, a decrease in dental treatment costs can be attained for future generations, leading to the possibility of a healthier tomorrow.
Moreover, in recent decades, the World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the importance of oral healthcare among children, pregnant women, and elderly populations, but unfortunately, monitoring these target groups with conventional methods cannot be performed effectively in developing countries because of financial issues and the lack of resources. Due to its relatively low operating budget, AI can be particularly helpful in less affluent or sanctioned countries that are in dire need of quality surveillance systems to improve their healthcare systems in a short period of time.
Although the mentioned advantages are significant, there are still complexities associated with AI utilization in dentistry. Problems with data selection and preprocessing, as well as defining gold standards, hampers results in terms of robustness and comparability, especially since dental data availability is limited due to data and protected patient information regulations, resulting in biased datasets. Moreover, specific algorithms are not easily generalized for similar tasks, potentially leading to biased outcomes in some instances. Additionally, the current processing power for AI computations is limited, causing performance drops when the layers of a deep learning model increase or when training on large datasets [82]. Although AI-specific chips are being developed, there is still room for hardware and software improvements [83]. Another major challenge is defining clear ethical guidelines for the clinical use of AI. The advancement of AI has raised ethical issues such as privacy violations, security risks, and transparency. Protecting patient data through strong encryption methods is crucial, but achieving healthcare privacy may be difficult with extensive data sharing. Integrating AI into healthcare may worsen existing health disparities due to potential algorithmic bias [84].
To address the current challenges effectively, deeper research is required in key areas, including advanced data techniques for creating unbiased datasets, the development of generalized algorithms, optimization of processing power, and the establishment of clear ethical guidelines for responsible AI integration in dental healthcare.

5. Conclusions

Despite AI’s ability to assist clinicians as an auxiliary tool in multiple criteria, results derived from AI models should be interpreted with caution. AI models still face some drawbacks and have not largely entered routine dental practice. Therefore, some key factors should be considered to cope with the current challenges and limitations encountered while implementing ML in clinical dentistry:
  • With the help of modern computational processing power, more sympathetic AI models should be devised that can imitate human understanding and emotions to a higher degree for the purpose of building trust with the patients and reassuring them in stressful situations
  • Data management should move towards decentralized methods with the help of cloud services in order to enable individual users, who have limited processing power and information, to utilize vast amounts of polished data for training their models locally
Furthermore, systematic reviews should be conducted regarding the use cases of AI in dentistry so as to give researchers a deeper insight into this modern technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.N. and B.N.S.; methodology, B.N.S.; software, S.D.; validation, S.D.; formal analysis, S.M.N.; investigation, S.D.; resources, I.L.; data curation, S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.N.; writing—review and editing, I.L.; visualization, B.N.S.; supervision, I.L. and B.N.S.; project administration, B.N.S.; funding acquisition, I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author can provide data upon a reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kishimoto, T.; Goto, T.; Matsuda, T.; Iwawaki, Y.; Ichikawa, T. Application of artificial intelligence in the dental field: A literature review. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2022, 66, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lifschitz, V. John McCarthy (1927–2011). Nature 2011, 480, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schwendicke, F.a.; Samek, W.; Krois, J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Chances and challenges. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reyes, L.T.; Knorst, J.K.; Ortiz, F.R.; Ardenghi, T.M. Scope and challenges of machine learning-based diagnosis and prognosis in clinical dentistry: A literature review. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2021, 7, 523. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Park, W.J.; Park, J.-B. History and application of artificial neural networks in dentistry. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shortliffe, E.H.; Buchanan, B.G. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Math. Biosci. 1975, 23, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nagi, R.; Aravinda, K.; Rakesh, N.; Gupta, R.; Pal, A.; Mann, A.K. Clinical applications and performance of intelligent systems in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A review. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2020, 50, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. Deep Learning; MIT press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouletreau, P.; Makaremi, M.; Ibrahim, B.; Louvrier, A.; Sigaux, N. Artificial intelligence: Applications in orthognathic surgery. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 120, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shan, T.; Tay, F.; Gu, L. Application of artificial intelligence in dentistry. J. Dent. Res. 2021, 100, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schwendicke, F.; Golla, T.; Dreher, M.; Krois, J. Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: A scoping review. J. Dent. 2019, 91, 103226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maruyama, T.; Hayashi, N.; Sato, Y.; Hyuga, S.; Wakayama, Y.; Watanabe, H.; Ogura, A.; Ogura, T. Comparison of medical image classification accuracy among three machine learning methods. J. Xray Sci. Technol. 2018, 26, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. De Angelis, F.; Pranno, N.; Franchina, A.; Di Carlo, S.; Brauner, E.; Ferri, A.; Pellegrino, G.; Grecchi, E.; Goker, F.; Stefanelli, L.V. Artificial Intelligence: A New Diagnostic Software in Dentistry: A Preliminary Performance Diagnostic Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, X.; Xin, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W. Predicting postoperative pain following root canal treatment by using artificial neural network evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Danks, R.P.; Bano, S.; Orishko, A.; Tan, H.J.; Moreno Sancho, F.; D’Aiuto, F.; Stoyanov, D. Automating Periodontal bone loss measurement via dental landmark localisation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2021, 16, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, P.; Kong, D.; Tang, T.; Su, D.; Yang, P.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y. Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vinayahalingam, S.; Kempers, S.; Limon, L.; Deibel, D.; Maal, T.; Hanisch, M.; Bergé, S.; Xi, T. Classification of caries in third molars on panoramic radiographs using deep learning. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Monill-González, A.; Rovira-Calatayud, L.; d’Oliveira, N.G.; Ustrell-Torrent, J.M. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: Where are we now? A scoping review. Orthod. Craniofacial Res. 2021, 24, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Aminoshariae, A.; Kulild, J.; Nagendrababu, V. Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Current applications and future directions. J. Endod. 2021, 47, 1352–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wilson, S. Management of child patient behavior: Quality of care, fear and anxiety, and the child patient. J. Endod. 2013, 39, S73–S77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Force, U.P.S.T. Screening and Preventive Interventions for Oral Health in Children and Adolescents Aged 5 to 17 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2023, 330, 1666–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, E.-H.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.-J.; Jeong, H.-o.; Lee, J.; Jang, J.; Joo, J.-Y.; Shin, Y.; Kang, J.; Park, A.K. Prediction of chronic periodontitis severity using machine learning models based on salivary bacterial copy number. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 571515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shimpi, N.; McRoy, S.; Zhao, H.; Wu, M.; Acharya, A. Development of a periodontitis risk assessment model for primary care providers in an interdisciplinary setting. Technol. Health Care 2020, 28, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saghiri, M.A.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Gutmann, J.L.; Lotfi, M.; Asgar, K. The reliability of artificial neural network in locating minor apical foramen: A cadaver study. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fukuda, M.; Inamoto, K.; Shibata, N.; Ariji, Y.; Yanashita, Y.; Kutsuna, S.; Nakata, K.; Katsumata, A.; Fujita, H.; Ariji, E. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for detecting vertical root fracture on panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol. 2020, 36, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Benyo, B.; Szilagyi, L.; Haidegger, T.; Kovacs, L.; Nagy-Dobo, C. Detection of the root canal’s centerline from dental micro-CT records. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 2009, 3517–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sukegawa, S.; Matsuyama, T.; Tanaka, F.; Hara, T.; Yoshii, K.; Yamashita, K.; Nakano, K.; Takabatake, K.; Kawai, H.; Nagatsuka, H. Evaluation of multi-task learning in deep learning-based positioning classification of mandibular third molars. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vranckx, M.; Van Gerven, A.; Willems, H.; Vandemeulebroucke, A.; Ferreira Leite, A.; Politis, C.; Jacobs, R. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven molar angulation measurements to predict third molar eruption on panoramic radiographs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hiraiwa, T.; Ariji, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Kise, Y.; Nakata, K.; Katsumata, A.; Fujita, H.; Ariji, E. A deep-learning artificial intelligence system for assessment of root morphology of the mandibular first molar on panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2019, 48, 20180218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Patcas, R.; Bernini, D.A.; Volokitin, A.; Agustsson, E.; Rothe, R.; Timofte, R. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 48, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kuwada, C.; Ariji, Y.; Kise, Y.; Funakoshi, T.; Fukuda, M.; Kuwada, T.; Gotoh, K.; Ariji, E. Detection and classification of unilateral cleft alveolus with and without cleft palate on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning system. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alzubaidi, M.A.; Otoom, M. A comprehensive study on feature types for osteoporosis classification in dental panoramic radiographs. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 188, 105301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kwon, O.; Yong, T.-H.; Kang, S.-R.; Kim, J.-E.; Huh, K.-H.; Heo, M.-S.; Lee, S.-S.; Choi, S.-C.; Yi, W.-J. Automatic diagnosis for cysts and tumors of both jaws on panoramic radiographs using a deep convolution neural network. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2020, 49, 20200185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Takahashi, T.; Nozaki, K.; Gonda, T.; Ikebe, K. A system for designing removable partial dentures using artificial intelligence. Part 1. Classification of partially edentulous arches using a convolutional neural network. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2021, 65, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Takahashi, T.; Nozaki, K.; Gonda, T.; Mameno, T.; Ikebe, K. Deep learning-based detection of dental prostheses and restorations. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sukegawa, S.; Yoshii, K.; Hara, T.; Matsuyama, T.; Yamashita, K.; Nakano, K.; Takabatake, K.; Kawai, H.; Nagatsuka, H.; Furuki, Y. Multi-task deep learning model for classification of dental implant brand and treatment stage using dental panoramic radiograph images. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, H.; Shan, J.; Zhang, P.; Chen, X.; Jiang, H. Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mameno, T.; Wada, M.; Nozaki, K.; Takahashi, T.; Tsujioka, Y.; Akema, S.; Hasegawa, D.; Ikebe, K. Predictive modeling for peri-implantitis by using machine learning techniques. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jung, S.-K.; Kim, T.-W. New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2016, 149, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kök, H.; Acilar, A.M.; İzgi, M.S. Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics. Prog. Orthod. 2019, 20, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kunz, F.; Stellzig-Eisenhauer, A.; Zeman, F.; Boldt, J. Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2020, 81, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leite, A.F.; Gerven, A.V.; Willems, H.; Beznik, T.; Lahoud, P.; Gaêta-Araujo, H.; Vranckx, M.; Jacobs, R. Artificial intelligence-driven novel tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 2257–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sathya, B.; Neelaveni, R. Transfer learning based automatic human identification using dental traits-an aid to forensic odontology. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2020, 76, 102066. [Google Scholar]
  44. Farhadian, M.; Salemi, F.; Saati, S.; Nafisi, N. Dental age estimation using the pulp-to-tooth ratio in canines by neural networks. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2019, 49, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tamaki, Y.; Nomura, Y.; Katsumura, S.; Okada, A.; Yamada, H.; Tsuge, S.; Kadoma, Y.; Hanada, N. Construction of a dental caries prediction model by data mining. J. Oral Sci. 2009, 51, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, L.; Wu, W.; Zhang, S.-y.; Zhang, K.-q.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Z.-h. Dental caries prediction based on a survey of the oral health epidemiology among the geriatric residents of Liaoning, China. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 5348730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moutselos, K.; Berdouses, E.; Oulis, C.; Maglogiannis, I. Recognizing occlusal caries in dental intraoral images using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany, 23–27 July 2019; pp. 1617–1620. [Google Scholar]
  48. You, W.; Hao, A.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Xia, B. Deep learning-based dental plaque detection on primary teeth: A comparison with clinical assessments. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Hays, R.D.; Marcus, M.; Maida, C.A.; Shen, J.; Xiong, D.; Coulter, I.D.; Lee, S.Y.; Spolsky, V.W.; Crall, J.J.; et al. Developing Children’s Oral Health Assessment Toolkits Using Machine Learning Algorithm. JDR Clin. Trans. Res. 2020, 5, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ahn, Y.; Hwang, J.J.; Jung, Y.-H.; Jeong, T.; Shin, J. Automated mesiodens classification system using deep learning on panoramic radiographs of children. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Abdalla-Aslan, R.; Yeshua, T.; Kabla, D.; Leichter, I.; Nadler, C. An artificial intelligence system using machine-learning for automatic detection and classification of dental restorations in panoramic radiography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2020, 130, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, E.; Kim, D.; Lee, J.-Y.; Park, H.-K. Artificial intelligence in detecting temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis on orthopantomogram. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, J.; Lee, H.-S.; Song, I.-S.; Jung, K.-H. DeNTNet: Deep Neural Transfer Network for the detection of periodontal bone loss using panoramic dental radiographs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, J.H.; Jeong, S.N.; Choi, S.H. Predictive data mining for diagnosing periodontal disease: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (KNHANES V and VI) from 2010 to 2015. J. Public Health Dent. 2019, 79, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Saghiri, M.A.; Asgar, K.; Boukani, K.; Lotfi, M.; Aghili, H.; Delvarani, A.; Karamifar, K.; Saghiri, A.; Mehrvarzfar, P.; Garcia-Godoy, F. A new approach for locating the minor apical foramen using an artificial neural network. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kavitha, M.S.; Ganesh Kumar, P.; Park, S.-Y.; Huh, K.-H.; Heo, M.-S.; Kurita, T.; Asano, A.; An, S.-Y.; Chien, S.-I. Automatic detection of osteoporosis based on hybrid genetic swarm fuzzy classifier approaches. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2016, 45, 20160076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bernauer, S.A.; Zitzmann, N.U.; Joda, T. The use and performance of artificial intelligence in prosthodontics: A systematic review. Sensors 2021, 21, 6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Benakatti, V.B.; Nayakar, R.P.; Anandhalli, M. Machine learning for identification of dental implant systems based on shape–A descriptive study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2021, 21, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, J.-H.; Jeong, S.-N. Efficacy of deep convolutional neural network algorithm for the identification and classification of dental implant systems, using panoramic and periapical radiographs: A pilot study. Medicine 2020, 99, e20787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Z. Machine learning in orthodontics: Challenges and perspectives. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2021, 30, 1065–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Flieger, R.; Matys, J.; Dominiak, M. The best time for orthodontic treatment for Polish children based on skeletal age analysis in accordance to refund policy of the Polish National Health Fund (NFZ). Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 27, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mohammad-Rahimi, H.; Nadimi, M.; Rohban, M.H.; Shamsoddin, E.; Lee, V.Y.; Motamedian, S.R. Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: A scoping review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2021, 160, 170–192.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Siino, V.; Sears, C. Artificially intelligent scoring and classification engine for forensic identification. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020, 44, 102162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Heinrich, A.; Güttler, F.; Wendt, S.; Schenkl, S.; Hubig, M.; Wagner, R.; Mall, G.; Teichgräber, U. Forensic odontology: Automatic identification of persons comparing antemortem and postmortem panoramic radiographs using computer vision. RöFo-Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb. Röntgenstrahlen Bildgeb. Verfahr. 2018, 190, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chomdej, T.; Pankaow, W.; Choychumroon, S. Intelligent dental identification system (IDIS) in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006, 158, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Selwitz, R.H.; Ismail, A.I.; Pitts, N.B. Dental caries. Lancet 2007, 369, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Strużycka, I. The oral microbiome in dental caries. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, X.; Liang, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Gu, D.; Sun, W.; Miao, L. Development and evaluation of deep learning for screening dental caries from oral photographs. Oral Dis. 2022, 28, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.-H.; Jeong, S.-N.; Choi, S.-H. Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. J. Dent. 2018, 77, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wang, Q.; Jia, P.; Cuenco, K.T.; Zeng, Z.; Feingold, E.; Marazita, M.L.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Z. Association signals unveiled by a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis of dental caries genome-wide association studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Devito, K.L.; de Souza Barbosa, F.; Felippe Filho, W.N. An artificial multilayer perceptron neural network for diagnosis of proximal dental caries. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontology 2008, 106, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moran, M.; Faria, M.; Giraldi, G.; Bastos, L.; Oliveira, L.; Conci, A. Classification of approximal caries in bitewing radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Sensors 2021, 21, 5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bolette, A.; Truong, T.T.-T.; Gueders, A.; Geerts, S. Importance des traitements pulpaires en denture de lait. Rev. Médicale Liège 2016, 71, 567–572. [Google Scholar]
  74. Shibly, O.; Rifai, S.; Zambon, J.J. Supragingival dental plaque in the etiology of oral diseases. Periodontol 2000 1995, 8, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Park, Y.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Choi, Y.-Y. Prediction Models of Early Childhood Caries Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Russell, K.A.; Folwarczna, M.A. Mesiodens-diagnosis and management of a common supernumerary tooth. J.-Can. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 69, 362–367. [Google Scholar]
  77. Nazemisalman, B.; Farsadeghi, M.; Sokhansanj, M. Types of lasers and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Engelhardt, A.; Kanawade, R.; Knipfer, C.; Schmid, M.; Stelzle, F.; Adler, W. Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Artuzi, F.E.; Puricelli, E.; Baraldi, C.E.; Quevedo, A.S.; Ponzoni, D. Reduction of osteoarthritis severity in the temporomandibular joint of rabbits treated with chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Gan, Y.; Zhou, Y. Current understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Anil, S.; Porwal, P.; Porwal, A. Transforming Dental Caries Diagnosis Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Techniques. Cureus 2023, 15, e41694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hosny, A.; Parmar, C.; Quackenbush, J.; Schwartz, L.H.; Aerts, H. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sunny, S.; Baby, A.; James, B.L.; Balaji, D.; Aparna, N.V.; Rana, M.H.; Gurpur, P.; Skandarajah, A.; D’Ambrosio, M.; Ramanjinappa, R.D.; et al. A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Corrêa, N.K.; Galvão, C.; Santos, J.W.; Del Pino, C.; Pinto, E.P.; Barbosa, C.; Massmann, D.; Mambrini, R.; Galvão, L.; Terem, E.; et al. Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. Patterns 2023, 4, 100857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Overview of AI implementation in various dental specialties.
Table 1. Overview of AI implementation in various dental specialties.
AuthorApplicationData SetAI ArchitecturePerformance
Danks et al. [15]PBL measurement340 imagesCNNPercent of correct key points (PCK): 0.83
Kim et al. [22]Prediction of chronic periodontitis severity692 mouthwash samplesNN
RF
SVM
RLR
Accuracy: 0.93
AUC: 0.96
Sensitivity: 0.96
Specificity: 0.81
Lee et al. [11]Diagnosis for periodontal disease45,553 participantsDTAccuracy: 0.85
Shimpi et al. [23]Estimation of periodontitis11,048 patientsDTSpecificity: 0.90
Gao et al. [14]Estimation of pain after RCT300 patientsANNAccuracy: 0.95
Saghiri et al. [24]Locating minor apical foramen50 imagesANNAccuracy: 0.96
Fukuda et al. [25]Vertical root fracture detection300 imagesCNNPrecision: 0.93
F measure: 0.83
Recall: 0.75
Benyo et al. [26]Detecting medial axis of the rootMicro CT cross-section imagesANNAccuracy: 0.95
Sukegawa et al. [27]Classification of third molar1330 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.84
Vranckx et al. [28]Molar angulation measurement838 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.80–0.98
Hiraiwa et al. [29]Root morphology measurement760 image setsCNNSensitivity: 0.85–0.87
Patcas et al. [30]Facial attractiveness measurement146 patientsCNNMean difference: 1.22
Kuwada et al. [31]Cleft detection383 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.82
Alzubaidi et al. [32]Osteoporosis classification575 imagesSVMAccuracy: 0.92
Kwon et al. [33]Diagnosis for cysts and tumors of both jaws1282 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.956
AUC: 0.94
Sensitivity: 0.889
Specificity: 0.956
Takahashi et al. [34]Classification of partially edentulous arches1184 imagesCNNAccuracy:
0.995 Maxilla
0.997 Mandible
Takahashi et al. [35]Identification of prostheses1904 imagesCNNPrecision: 0.59–0.93
Sukegawa et al. [36]Classification of dental implant brand9767 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.9908
Zhang et al. [37]Detect marginal bone loss81 patientsSVMAUC: 0.967
Mameno et al. [38]Predicting peri-implantitis489 patientsSVMAUC: 0.64
Jung et al. [39]Diagnosis of tooth extractions for orthodontic treatmentLateral Cephalograms, 156 subjectsNeural networkAccuracy: 0.93
Kök et al. [40]Growth determination300 imagesANNAccuracy: 0.78–0.93
Kunz et al. [41]Cephalometric analysis1792 imagesCNNAbsolute mean difference: 0.42–2.18
Leite et al. [42]Tooth segmentation153 imagesCNNPrecision: 0.96
Sathya et al. [43]Human identification3159 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.95
Farhadian et al. [44]Age estimationCBCT scans, 300 subjectsNeural networkMAF: 4.12 Years
Tamaki et al. [45]Dental caries predictionSaliva samples, 500 subjectsCNNSensitivity: 0.73
Specificity: 0.77
Liu et al. [46]Dental caries prediction1144 subjectsGRNNAUC: 0.626
Moutselos et al. [47]Caries classification88 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.67–0.89
You et al. [48]Plaque detection984 imagesCNNMIoU: 0.726 ± 0.165
Wang et al. [49]Evaluating children’s oral condition545 subjectsXGboostSensitivity: 0.93
Ahn et al. [50]Mesiodens classification1100 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.927
Abdalla-Aslan et al. [51]Classification of dental restorations83 imagesSVMAccuracy: 0.93
Choi et al. [52]Detection of TMJOA 1189 imagesCNNAccuracy: 0.78
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naeimi, S.M.; Darvish, S.; Salman, B.N.; Luchian, I. Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050431

AMA Style

Naeimi SM, Darvish S, Salman BN, Luchian I. Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(5):431. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naeimi, Seyed Mohammadrasoul, Shayan Darvish, Bahareh Nazemi Salman, and Ionut Luchian. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review" Bioengineering 11, no. 5: 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop