Next Article in Journal
Integrated Modeling of Composition-Resolved Source Apportionment and Dynamic Projection for Ozone Pollution in Datong
Previous Article in Journal
Association of 6:2 Fluorotelomer Ethoxylate Exposure with Serum Lipids in General Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Proteomic Analysis of Heavy Metal-Induced Toxicity Using the Cellular Slime Mould Dictyostelium discoideum: Effects of Copper Exposure on Aggregation and Protein Expression

Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tokyo College, 1220-2 Kunugida, Hachioji 193-0997, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(8), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080665
Submission received: 4 July 2025 / Revised: 5 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Ecotoxicology)

Abstract

The cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum is a soil-dwelling eukaryotic organism that undergoes distinctive morphological changes during starvation, making it a promising candidate for bioassay development. In this study, we evaluated the effects of copper (Cu) exposure on the morphological transformation of D. discoideum and performed a comparative proteomic analysis. Copper exposure on agar media delayed aggregate formation by 3.5 h compared to the controls. Approximately 280 protein spots were detected using immobilised pH gradient two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by silver staining. Three spots disappeared upon exposure to Cu. Based on isoelectric point and molecular weight analyses, the proteins were predicted to be formin-1, a cytoplasmic regulator of adenylyl cyclase (CRAC), and a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-containing protein. Formin-1 and CRAC are involved in aggregation processes. These findings suggest that Cu disrupts aggregation-related protein expression in D. discoideum and highlight the potential of D. discoideum-based bioassays using proteomic biomarkers for environmental monitoring.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Environmental contamination by heavy metals and organic pollutants remains a significant global issue that threatens both ecosystems and human health [1,2]. Bioassays utilising living organisms provide direct and sensitive methods for assessing environmental toxicity. Traditional bioassays often rely on endpoints such as mortality rates or growth inhibition, which require prolonged observation and often lack mechanistic insights into toxicity [3,4].
Recently, there has been increasing interest in understanding the dynamics of how pollutants affect specific cellular signalling pathways and stress responses [5]. Dictyostelium discoideum, a eukaryotic microorganism that inhabits forest soils, exhibits a unique life cycle that transitions from unicellular amoebae to multicellular structures under starvation conditions. This morphological transformation is rapid, highly regulated, and sensitive to environmental stressors, making D. discoideum a valuable model for investigating cellular responses to toxic substances [6].
Cu was selected as the first-choice toxicant because, although it is an essential trace element, it exerts broad cellular toxicity at elevated concentrations, including disruption of protein structure and induction of oxidative stress [7]. Previous studies have indicated that D. discoideum is sensitive to heavy metals such as mercury and copper (Cu) [8,9,10]. However, most assays employ liquid cultures that differ substantially from the natural soil environment of organisms. In this study, we employed solid agar-based cultures supplemented with Cu to mimic natural conditions. We aimed to establish a rapid and sensitive bioassay based on aggregation delay and identify proteomic biomarkers associated with Cu-induced toxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals, including Cu standard solution (1000 ppm), mycological peptone, yeast extract, and reagents for electrophoresis, were purchased from recognised suppliers (Wako, Kanto Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan, Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA, Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan, and GE Healthcare).

2.2. Strain and Culture Conditions

Seed stock was provided by the Science and Education Centre, Ochanomizu University. The AX-2 strain of D. discoideum was cultured axenically in AX-2 medium. D. discoideum was statically cultured in 4 mL of AX-2 medium at 22 °C under sterile conditions until the density of the cellular slime mould reached 1–2 × 107 cells/mL. A suspension of D. discoideum was added to a petri dish containing 4 mL of X-2 medium, and the cell density was adjusted to 1–4 × 104 cells/mL, followed by static culture at 22 °C.

2.3. Aggregation Assay

Cells were collected from the bottom of the dish in AX-2 medium, by pipetting with 2 mL Bonner’s salt solution. The bacterial solution was transferred to a tube, stirred for 5 s using a vortex mixer, and centrifuged at 627× g for 1 min. The supernatant was discarded, 2 mL of Bonner’s salt solution was added, and the mixture was stirred for 5 s using a vortex mixer and then centrifuged at 627× g. This washing procedure was repeated thrice. After washing, cell density was measured using a haemocytometer (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and an upright optical microscope (Shimadzu Corporation). The cell density was adjusted to 3.2 × 107 cells/mL by adding Bonner’s salt solution. D. discoideum (6.4 × 107 cells) was seeded on non-nutrient agar medium (1.5% (w/v) agarose) and cultured at 22 °C under light irradiation. The number of aggregates in an area of 1.4 × 1.0 mm2 was recorded and observed under a microscope every 30 min for 24 h using the image analysis software program Motic Images Plus 2.1S (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The effect of copper exposure was examined by seeding D. discoideum on Cu-supplemented agar medium (1 ppm (w/v) Cu, 1.5% (w/v) agarose) and performing the same procedure as that for the non-nutrient agar medium. The number of aggregates within a 1.4 × 1.0 mm2 area was counted at 14 and 24 h after inoculation on media with or without copper, and Student’s t-test was used to assess whether the differences were statistically significant.

2.4. Protein Extraction and Quantification

The protein concentration of the analytical samples was measured by measuring the absorbance using Qubit® Protein Assay (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the instructions. The protein concentrations of the analytical samples were calculated from the measured absorbance values.
The cells were harvested at the aggregation stage (10.5 h post-seeding). Proteins were extracted by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, solubilised in a buffer containing urea, thiourea, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), and Triton X-100, and quantified using a Qubit Protein Assay Kit.

2.5. Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2-DE)

In this study, immobilised pH gradient isoelectric focusing was performed using an IPG (immobilised pH gradient strip dry gel) kit from Nihon Eido Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Approximately 50 μg of protein from the analysis sample and swelling solution (8 M urea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 65 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), 0.5% (w/v) ampholines pH 3.5–10, 0.001% (w/v) BPB (bromophenol blue)) were added to IPG gel (pH 3–10 liner, 7 cm, GE Healthcare, Bucks, UK), and the mixture was allowed to swell for 16–18 h at 23 °C, after which isoelectric focusing was performed. Electrophoresis was performed at 200 V for 10 min, 400 V for 10 min, 1000 V for 1 h, and 1500 V for 18–22 h. After isoelectric focusing, the gel was shaken for 10 min in 4 mL of sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) equilibration buffer (0.0625 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 25% (w/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.01% (w/v) BPB, and 5% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol). SDS-PAGE was carried out according to the method of Laemmli [11] using a separating gel of 10% (w/v) polyacrylamide containing 0.1% (w/v) SDS. The acrylamide gel used for the second dimension of SDS-PAGE had a gel size of 8.5 cm × 8.5 cm × 0.1 cm and consisted of a stacking gel of 1 cm and a separating gel of 7.5 cm. The equilibrated gel was placed on top of an acrylamide gel. After the IPG gel was fixed onto the second-dimension SDS-PAGE gel with 1.5% (w/v) agarose-containing SDS-PAGE equilibration buffer, the gel was electrophoresed up to 1 cm from the anode end of the gel at a constant current of 11 mA/cm2 for the stacking gel and 17 mA/cm2 for the separating gel.
After electrophoresis, the gel was shaken in 50% (v/v) methanol plus 5% (v/v) acetic acid for 14–18 h and then in 50% (v/v) methanol for 30 min to fix the proteins, followed by silver staining (Wako, Osaka, Japan).

2.6. Image and Data Analysis

The silver-stained gel was scanned using a scanner (GT-X900, EPSON, Tokyo, Japan) and EPSON Scan ver. 3.01, and the behaviour of the proteins displayed on the gel was analysed using the differential display method. The differential display method was used to comparatively analyse differences in the expression levels of RNAs or proteins between different samples using PCR and electrophoresis. The colours of the spots in the electropherograms of the Cu-exposed and unexposed samples were replaced with red and green, respectively, using ImageJ ver. to 1.43, and the expression of spots in the Cu-exposed and unexposed samples was compared by overlaying them. Based on the isoelectric point and molecular weight of the proteins whose expression was lost upon copper exposure, the proteins predicted to be expressed were examined using TagIdent. The search conditions were error tolerance of isoelectric point ±0.1 and error tolerance of molecular weight ±5%, and the organism species was limited to D. discoideum.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Observations

Figure 1 shows the morphological changes in D. discoideum grown on non-nutrient agar at different time points after seeding. On non-nutrient agar, D. discoideum formed aggregates by 10.5 h after seeding (Figure 1C, arrow). Figure 2 shows the morphological changes in D. discoideum grown on Cu-supplemented agar. Aggregate formation was not observed at 10.5 h after inoculation with the control-derived inoculum (Figure 2C), but became evident at 14 h (Figure 2D). This indicates that cells on copper-supplemented agar formed aggregates only after 14 h, reflecting a 3.5 h delay. The number of aggregates significantly decreased after Cu exposure for 14 and 24 h (p < 0.05).
Figure 3 shows the time course of the aggregate number changes on the control and Cu-containing agar. Aggregates were detected 10.5 h after starvation in unexposed cells and 14 h after Cu exposure. Cu exposure delayed aggregate formation by 3.5 h and reduced the number of aggregates. Figure 4 shows a comparison of the aggregate numbers at 14 and 24 h with and without Cu exposure. A significant reduction in D. discoideum aggregates was observed between Cu-exposed and unexposed conditions both 14 and 24 h after inoculation.

3.2. Proteomic Analysis

Figure 5A,B show representative silver-stained gel images of D. discoideum proteins. The samples were treated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA), extracted with a protein-solubilising solution containing urea, and separated by immobilised pH gradient two-dimensional electrophoresis combined with isoelectric focusing electrophoresis (IEF) and SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining. Approximately 280 protein spots were detected in both the control and Cu-exposed samples.
Figure 5C shows the differential display analysis highlighting the protein spots affected by Cu exposure. Figure 5D–I show enlargements of spots a, b, and c, which disappeared with Cu exposure. The spots in the electrophoretic diagram obtained from D. discoideum are green for those exposed to Cu and red for those not exposed, and the spots were overlaid to compare the expression levels. Three spots (designated spots a, b, and c) were missing after Cu exposure. Based on database searches, spot a corresponded to formin-1, spot b corresponded to CRAC, and spot c corresponded to a TPR-containing protein (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Copper exposure delays aggregation and reduces the number of aggregates formed by D. discoideum. This suggests that Cu toxicity interferes with the normal developmental program of D. discoideum, specifically the transition from unicellular amoebae to multicellular aggregates. Similar inhibitory effects of Cu on developmental processes have been observed in other model organisms, including Arabidopsis thaliana and Caenorhabditis elegans, highlighting the conserved nature of metal-induced developmental disruptions across species [12,13]. These findings support the potential utility of D. discoideum as a sensitive bioindicator.
Proteomic analysis revealed that the expression of three protein spots disappeared after Cu exposure. Based on isoelectric point and molecular weight analyses, the proteins were predicted to be formin-1, cytoplasmic regulator of adenylyl cyclase (CRAC), and a TPR-containing protein. Both formin-1 and CRAC are essential for aggregation in D. discoideum, indicating mechanistic disruption of actin cytoskeleton organisation and cAMP-mediated chemotaxis. Formin-1 is involved in the nucleation and elongation of actin filaments, which are crucial for pseudopodia formation and directional cell movement [14]. Previous studies have demonstrated that formin knockout strains of D. discoideum exhibit severely impaired aggregation and chemotactic responses [15], reinforcing our interpretation. Although there have been no reports that formin activity is directly affected by copper or other metal ions, Cu2+ has been reported to sever actin filaments and shorten their length, which may indirectly interfere with formin-mediated processes [16].
CRAC is critical for relaying cAMP signals and enabling coordinated cell aggregation during starvation. Inhibition or downregulation of CRAC has been shown to result in defective cAMP wave propagation and failure of aggregation centre formation [17]. To date, however, there have been no reports that CRAC is directly affected by Cu2+ or other metal ions. In the gill membranes of Mytilus galloprovincialis, micromolar concentrations of Cu2+ have been reported to strongly inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity, which is activated by CRAC [18]. Thus, the disappearance of CRAC under Cu stress suggests direct impairment of the signal transduction necessary for aggregation, further explaining the 3.5 h delay observed in our morphological assays.
The loss of a TPR-containing protein also implies broader disruption of protein complex formation or intracellular transport. TPR domains mediate protein–protein interactions involved in signal transduction, transcriptional regulation, and chaperone function [19]. Although the specific role of the identified TPR-containing protein in D. discoideum has not been fully elucidated, similar proteins have been implicated in stress response pathways in mammals [20], suggesting that Cu may also interfere with cellular stress responses.
It should be noted that our identification was based on bioinformatic predictions, and the lack of definitive identification of the affected proteins remains a limitation. Therefore, future work should involve LC-MS/MS analysis to conclusively identify these proteins and to further clarify the molecular pathways disrupted by Cu exposure.
Our results demonstrate that Cu-induced proteomic changes correlate with measurable developmental phenotypes in D. discoideum. Given the organism’s short developmental cycle, genetic tractability, and conservation of key eukaryotic signalling pathways, these findings strengthen the argument for its use in environmental toxicology, particularly in proteomics-based bioassays. Previous studies have proposed D. discoideum as a model for neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, and heavy metal responses [21,22]. Our study adds proteomics evidence to this body of work by highlighting the utility of two-dimensional electrophoresis in detecting environmentally responsive protein biomarkers.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that D. discoideum aggregation is a sensitive indicator of Cu toxicity and that proteomic profiling can identify key affected proteins. This approach may serve as a basis for the development of rapid and mechanistic environmental bioassays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.I. and R.S.; methodology, A.I., K.K., and R.S.; validation, A.I. and K.K.; formal analysis, A.I. and K.K.; investigation, K.K.; resources, R.S. and A.I.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, K.K., R.S., and A.I.; project administration, A.I. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SDS-PAGESodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

References

  1. Focazio, M.J.; Kolpin, D.W.; Barnes, K.K.; Furlong, E.T.; Meyer, M.T.; Zaugg, S.D.; Barber, L.B.; Thurman, M.E. A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States—II) Untreated drinking water sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 402, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kolpin, D.W.; Furlong, E.T.; Meyer, M.T.; Thurman, E.M.; Zaugg, S.D.; Barber, L.B.; Buxton, H.T. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1202–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adak, T.; Govindharaj, G.; Panneerselvam, P.; Gadratagi, B.G.; Kumar, U. Imidacloprid application changes microbial dynamics and enzyme activities in tropical rice soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.; Chai, J.; Liu, W.; Zhu, X.; Liu, H.; Wei, X. Biochar, soil and land-use interactions that reduce nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 651, 2354–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hajam, A.H.; Ali, M.S.; Singh, S.K.; Bashri, G. Understanding cytokinin: Biosynthesis, signal transduction, growth regulation, and phytohormonal crosstalk under heavy metal stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2024, 228, 106025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Waterborne polyurethane composites with antibacterial activity by incorporating p-BzOH intercalated MgAl-LDH. Compos. Commun. 2019, 13, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaetke, L.M.; Chow, C.K. Copper toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidant nutrients. Toxicology 2003, 189, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Francesco, D.; Henrik, J.; Mauro, R.; Gabriella, P.; Elena, B.; Giovanni, P.; Aldo, V. Cellular responses to environmental contaminants in amoebic cells of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxico. Pharmacol. 2005, 143, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Francesco, M.; Lara, B.; Elia, R.; Maria, C.; Valeria, M.; Francesco, D.; Aldo, V. Effects of mercury on Dictyostelium discoideum: Proteomics reveals the molecular mechanisms of physiological adaptation and toxicity. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2839–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sforzini, S.; Dagnino, A.; Torrielli, S.; Dondero, F.; Fenoglio, S.; Negri, A.; Boatti, L.; Viarengo, A. Use of highly sensitive sublethal stress responses in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum for an assessment of freshwater quality. Sci. Total. Environ. 2008, 395, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leung, M.C.; Williams, P.L.; Benedetto, A.; Au, C.; Helmcke, K.J.; Aschner, M.; Meyer, J.N. Caenorhabditis elegans: An emerging model in biomedical and environmental toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 106, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Faix, J.; Grosse, R. Staying in shape with formins. Dev. Cell 2006, 10, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Junemann, A.; Winterhoff, M.; Nordholz, B.; Rottner, K.; Eichinger, L.; Gräf, R.; Faix, J. ForC lacks canonical formin activity but bundles actin filaments and is required for multicellular development of Dictyostelium cells. Euro. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 92, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lakha, R.; Hachicho, C.; Mehlenbacher, M.R.; Wilcox, D.E.; Austin, R.N.; Vizcarra, C.L. Metallothionein-3 attenuates the effect of Cu2+ ions on actin filaments. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2023, 242, 112157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Insall, R.H.; Borleis, J.; Devreotes, P.N. The aimless RasGEF is required for processing of chemotactic signals through G-protein-coupled receptors in Dictyostelium. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fabbri, E.; Capuzzo, A. Adenylyl cyclase activity and its modulation in the gills of Mytilus galloprovincialis exposed to Cr6+ and Cu2+. Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 76, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. D’Andrea, L.D.; Regan, L. TPR proteins: The versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bouron, A.; Kiselyov, K.; Oberwinkler, J. Permeation, regulation and control of expression of TRP channels by trace metal ions. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2015, 467, 1146–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Williams, R.S.; Boeckeler, K.; Graf, R.; Muller-Taubenberger, A.; Li, Z.; Ismailoglu, I.; Gourley, C. Dictyostelium discoideum as a model for the study of neurodegenerative diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 17, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, J.; Fu, X.; Lin, H.; Chen, L.; Jin, Y. Proteomic analysis of copper stress response in rice seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 20524–20533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological changes of D. discoideum on non-nutrient agar at different time points after seeding. (A): Immediately after inoculation, (B): 5 h after inoculation, (C): 10.5 h after inoculation, (D): 14 h after inoculation. The arrows indicate D. discoideum aggregates, which have a round outline. No aggregates were observed 5 h after inoculation, but aggregate formation was detected 10.5 h after inoculation. The number of aggregates increased 14 h after inoculation. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Figure 1. Morphological changes of D. discoideum on non-nutrient agar at different time points after seeding. (A): Immediately after inoculation, (B): 5 h after inoculation, (C): 10.5 h after inoculation, (D): 14 h after inoculation. The arrows indicate D. discoideum aggregates, which have a round outline. No aggregates were observed 5 h after inoculation, but aggregate formation was detected 10.5 h after inoculation. The number of aggregates increased 14 h after inoculation. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Toxics 13 00665 g001
Figure 2. Morphological changes of D. discoideum on copper-supplemented agar. (A): Immediately after inoculation, (B): 5 h after inoculation, (C): 10.5 h after inoculation, (D): 14 h after inoculation. D. discoideum did not form aggregates at 5 or 10.5 hours after inoculation, but aggregate formation was observed at 14 h. The arrow indicates a D. discoideum aggregate, which have a round outline. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Figure 2. Morphological changes of D. discoideum on copper-supplemented agar. (A): Immediately after inoculation, (B): 5 h after inoculation, (C): 10.5 h after inoculation, (D): 14 h after inoculation. D. discoideum did not form aggregates at 5 or 10.5 hours after inoculation, but aggregate formation was observed at 14 h. The arrow indicates a D. discoideum aggregate, which have a round outline. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Toxics 13 00665 g002
Figure 3. Time course of aggregate number changes on control and Cu-containing agar. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Squares and diamonds indicate the aggregate numbers under control and Cu-exposure conditions, respectively. Aggregates were detected 10.5 h after starvation in unexposed cells and 14 h after Cu exposure. Copper exposure delayed aggregate formation by 3.5 h and reduced the number of aggregates.
Figure 3. Time course of aggregate number changes on control and Cu-containing agar. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Squares and diamonds indicate the aggregate numbers under control and Cu-exposure conditions, respectively. Aggregates were detected 10.5 h after starvation in unexposed cells and 14 h after Cu exposure. Copper exposure delayed aggregate formation by 3.5 h and reduced the number of aggregates.
Toxics 13 00665 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of aggregate numbers at 14 and 24 h with and without Cu exposure. Asterisks “*” indicate a significant difference in the number of D. discoideum aggregates between the Cu-exposed and unexposed conditions, as determined by t-test (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the reduction in the number of D. discoideum aggregates between Cu-exposed and unexposed conditions both 14 and 24 h after inoculation.
Figure 4. Comparison of aggregate numbers at 14 and 24 h with and without Cu exposure. Asterisks “*” indicate a significant difference in the number of D. discoideum aggregates between the Cu-exposed and unexposed conditions, as determined by t-test (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the reduction in the number of D. discoideum aggregates between Cu-exposed and unexposed conditions both 14 and 24 h after inoculation.
Toxics 13 00665 g004
Figure 5. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images of D. discoideum proteins. The samples were treated with TCA, extracted with a protein-solubilising solution containing urea, separated by immobilised pH gradient two-dimensional electrophoresis combining IEF and SDS-PAGE, and then silver stained. (A): Control, (B): Cu exposure. Expression of 280 proteins was detected under both copper exposure and non-exposure conditions. The spots in the electrophoretic diagram obtained from D. discoideum were coloured green for those exposed to Cu and red for those not exposed, and the spots were overlaid to compare the expression levels (C). Cu exposure caused expression of spot a, spot b, and spot c to disappear. Panels (DI) show magnified views of spots a to c, as indicated in panel C. Spots a, b, and c detected in the control group (panel D,F,H) are absent under the Cu exposure condition (panel E,G,I).
Figure 5. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images of D. discoideum proteins. The samples were treated with TCA, extracted with a protein-solubilising solution containing urea, separated by immobilised pH gradient two-dimensional electrophoresis combining IEF and SDS-PAGE, and then silver stained. (A): Control, (B): Cu exposure. Expression of 280 proteins was detected under both copper exposure and non-exposure conditions. The spots in the electrophoretic diagram obtained from D. discoideum were coloured green for those exposed to Cu and red for those not exposed, and the spots were overlaid to compare the expression levels (C). Cu exposure caused expression of spot a, spot b, and spot c to disappear. Panels (DI) show magnified views of spots a to c, as indicated in panel C. Spots a, b, and c detected in the control group (panel D,F,H) are absent under the Cu exposure condition (panel E,G,I).
Toxics 13 00665 g005
Table 1. Identified proteins corresponding to spots that disappeared under Cu exposure conditions.
Table 1. Identified proteins corresponding to spots that disappeared under Cu exposure conditions.
SpotExperiment ValueProtein NameDictybaseIDExPasy Data Base
pIMw (kDa)DDBpIMw (Da)Rank
a6.3102formin-1DDB_G02845196.27106,4621
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase ddx10DDB_G02840176.24100,3592
mental retardation GTPase activating protein homolog 2DDB_G02700246.3397,4113
dynamin-like protein ADDB_G02685926.4101,4044
folliculin interacting protein repeat-containing proteinDDB_G02719966.29105,8815
myb-like protein KDDB_G02768776.32100,9126
b8.178cytoplasmic regulator of adenylylcyclaseDDB_G02851618.0878,4991
target of Myb protein 1DDB_G02901638.175,3752
inner no outer 80 complex subunit DDDB_G02884478.0778,2333
cycloartenol synthaseDDB_G02692268.1980,7634
c7.531tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein DDB_G02850957.5729,7481
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Itoh, A.; Kurihara, K.; Shoji, R. Proteomic Analysis of Heavy Metal-Induced Toxicity Using the Cellular Slime Mould Dictyostelium discoideum: Effects of Copper Exposure on Aggregation and Protein Expression. Toxics 2025, 13, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080665

AMA Style

Itoh A, Kurihara K, Shoji R. Proteomic Analysis of Heavy Metal-Induced Toxicity Using the Cellular Slime Mould Dictyostelium discoideum: Effects of Copper Exposure on Aggregation and Protein Expression. Toxics. 2025; 13(8):665. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Itoh, Atsuko, Koji Kurihara, and Ryo Shoji. 2025. "Proteomic Analysis of Heavy Metal-Induced Toxicity Using the Cellular Slime Mould Dictyostelium discoideum: Effects of Copper Exposure on Aggregation and Protein Expression" Toxics 13, no. 8: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080665

APA Style

Itoh, A., Kurihara, K., & Shoji, R. (2025). Proteomic Analysis of Heavy Metal-Induced Toxicity Using the Cellular Slime Mould Dictyostelium discoideum: Effects of Copper Exposure on Aggregation and Protein Expression. Toxics, 13(8), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop