Next Article in Journal
From Mine to Market: Streamlining Sustainable Gold Production with Cutting-Edge Technologies for Enhanced Productivity and Efficiency in Central Asia
Previous Article in Journal
Prioritizing ERP System Selection Challenges in UAE Ports: A Fuzzy Delphi and Relative Importance Index Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices

by
Thompson McDaniel
1,
Edit Süle
2,* and
Gyula Vastag
3
1
Doctoral School of Economics and Business Informatics, Corvinus University of Budapest, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Corporate Leadership and Marketing, Széchenyi István University, H-9026 Győr, Hungary
3
Department of Public Administration and Infotechnology, Ludovika University of Public Service, H-1581 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Logistics 2025, 9(3), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030099
Submission received: 19 June 2025 / Revised: 16 July 2025 / Accepted: 21 July 2025 / Published: 28 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Supply Chains and Logistics)

Abstract

Background: Sustainability in supply chain management (SCM) practices is becoming increasingly important as environmental responsibility and social concerns, as well as enterprises’ competitiveness in terms of innovation, risk, and economic performance, become increasingly urgent. This paper aims to identify and prioritize concepts for implementing sustainable supply chains, drawing on sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and green supply chain management (GSCM) techniques. Corporate supply chain managers across various industries, markets, and supply chain segments brainstormed management practices to enhance the sustainability of their supply chains. Four industry sectors were surveyed across five different value chain segments. Methods: A group concept mapping (GCM) approach incorporating multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used. A hierarchy of practices is proposed, and hypotheses are developed about achievability and impact. Results: A decision-making matrix prioritizes eight solution concepts based on two axes: impact (I) and ease of implementation (EoI). Conclusions: Eight concepts are prioritized based on the optimal effectiveness of implementing the solutions. Pattern matching reveals differences between emerging and developed markets, as well as supply chain segments, that decision-makers should be aware of. By analyzing supply chains from a multi-part perspective, this research goes beyond empirical studies based on a single industry, geographic region, or example case.
Keywords: sustainability; green supply chain management practices; organizational change; group concept mapping; prioritization of implementation sustainability; green supply chain management practices; organizational change; group concept mapping; prioritization of implementation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McDaniel, T.; Süle, E.; Vastag, G. Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices. Logistics 2025, 9, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030099

AMA Style

McDaniel T, Süle E, Vastag G. Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices. Logistics. 2025; 9(3):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030099

Chicago/Turabian Style

McDaniel, Thompson, Edit Süle, and Gyula Vastag. 2025. "Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices" Logistics 9, no. 3: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030099

APA Style

McDaniel, T., Süle, E., & Vastag, G. (2025). Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices. Logistics, 9(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030099

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop