Multicriteria Model Proposition to Support the Management of Systems of E-Waste Collection
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Solid Waste
2.1.1. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
2.1.2. WEEE Management in Brazil
2.2. Reverse Logistics (RL)
Sustainability and WEEE
2.3. Operational Research (OR) in WEEE Collection Systems Management
2.4. Formatting of Mathematical Components: The Method Flexible and Interactive Trade-Off—FITradeoff
FITradeoff for Ordering
3. State of the Art on the Management of WEEE Collection Systems
State of the Art Synthesis
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis
4.2. Proposed Model to WEEE Management
5. Application of the Model
5.1. Preparatory Phase
5.1.1. Contextualization of the Problem
5.1.2. Definition of Shared Responsibility Actors
5.1.3. Characterization of the Decision-Maker(s)
5.1.4. Identification of Objectives
5.2. Definition Phase
5.2.1. Definition of Criteria
5.2.2. Definition of Alternatives
5.2.3. Proposition and Justification of the MCDA Method
5.3. Structuring Phase
5.3.1. Intra-Criteria Evaluation
5.3.2. Modeling the Problem
5.3.3. Inter Criterion Evaluation
5.4. Conclusion Phase
5.4.1. Problem Resolution
5.4.2. Modeling Feedback
5.4.3. Final Considerations on the Application of the Model
6. Final Considerations
Future Studies
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Alternatives | Criteria | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | |
A1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
A2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
A3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
A4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
A5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
A6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
A7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
A8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
A9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
A10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Appendix B
Criteria | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-Cont Min; 1-Cont Max; 2- Disc Min; 3-Disc Max; | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Weights: | ||||||||||
Type: | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
a: | ||||||||||
b: | ||||||||||
c: | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Alternatives: | Consequences Matrix | |||||||||
Alternative 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
Alternative 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Alternative 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
Alternative 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
Alternative 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Alternative 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
Alternative 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Alternative 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Alternative 9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
Alternative 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
References
- Cucchiella, F.; D’adamo, I.; Lenny Koh, S.C.; Rosa, P. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baldé, C.P.; Forti, V.; Gray, V.; Kuehr, R.; Stegmann, P. The Global E-Waste Monitor 2017. 2017. Available online: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6341/Global-E-waste_Monitor_2017__electronic_single_pages_.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2018).
- Araujo, U.R.; Oliveira, F.A.S.; Marins, J.; Muniz, J. Cost assessment and benefits of using RFID in reverse logistics of waste electrical & electronic equipment (WEEE). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 55, 688–697. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, E.; De Almeida, G.O.; Guarnieri, P.; Silva, L. Uma analise sobre o uso da Pesquisa Operacional no suporte ao gerenciamento de resíduos eletroeletrônico. In Proceedings of the Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção—ENEGEP, Maceio, Brazil, 16–19 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Al Razi, K.M.H. Resourceful recycling process of waste desktop computers: A review study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 10, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouveia, N. Resíduos sólidos urbanos: Impactos socioambientais e perspectiva de manejo sustentável com inclusão social. Cien. Saude Colet. 2012, 17, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brazil. Law 12, 305 of 2 August 2010. Establishes the National Policy on Solid Waste: Amends Law No. 9, 605, of 12 February 1998 and Makes Other Arrangements; Brazil. 2010. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm (accessed on 15 April 2018).
- de Souza, C.D.R.; de Siqueira Santos, M.P. Avaliação de cadeias logísticas reversa sob o enfoque da sustentabilidade. Rev. Gestão Sustentabilidade Ambient. 2015, 3, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R.B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200, 198–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiddee, P.; Naidu, R.; Wong, M.H. Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williams, E. International Activities on E-Waste and Guidelines for Future Work; National Institute of Environmental Sciences: Tsukuba, Japan, 2005; pp. 1–11.
- Demajorovic, J.; Magliano, J.E.B. National Policy on Solid Waste and its implications on the reverse logistics chain of microcomputers in Brazil. Gestão Reg. 2013, 29, 64–80. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, M.E.; Balbino, D.P.; Gómez, C.P. Consumo sustentável na base da pirâmide: Definindo papéis e obrigações para a efetivação do desenvolvimento sustentável. Rev. Gestão Soc. Ambient. 2011, 5, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Miguez, E.C. Logística Reversa como Solução para o Problema do lixo Eletrônico: Benefícios Ambientais e Financeiros, 1st ed.; Qualitymark: São Paulo, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Diretiva 2012/19/UE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho de 4 de julho de 2012 Relativa aos Resíduos de Equipamentos Eletroeletrônicos (REEE); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- ABINEE. A Indústria Elétrica E Eletrônica Impulsionando a Economia Verde e a Sustentabilidade; ABINEE: São Paulo, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Xavier, L.H.; Carvalho, T.C. Gestão de Resíduos Eletroeletrônicos, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Deshmukh, V.; Gupta, S.; Agrawal, R. Improving the Solid Waste Management by Developing the Peoples Perception—A Case Study. In Proceedings of the International Waste Management Biennial Congress & Exhibition, Durban, South Africa, 30 September–4 October 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Murad, W.; Siwar, C. Waste management and recycling practices of the urban poor: A case study in Kuala Lumpur city, Malaysi. Waste Manag. Res. 2007, 25, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caiado, N.; Guarnieri, P.; Xavier, L.H.; Chaves, G.D.D. A characterization of the Brazilian market of reverse logistic credits (RLC) and an analogy with the existing carbon credit market. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 118, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zlamparet, G.I.; Ijomah, W.; Miao, Y.; Awasthi, A.K.; Zeng, X.; Li, J. Remanufacturing strategies: A solution for WEEE problem. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios: Síntese de indicadores em 2011; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013.
- ABRELPE. Panorama Dos Resíduos Sólidos No Brazil 2014; São Paulo, Brazil. 2014. Available online: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2015.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2018).
- Manomaivibool, P.; Hong, J.H. Two decades, three WEEE systems: How far did EPR evolve in Korea’s resource circulation policy? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, A.; Metternicht, G. Assessing effectiveness of WEEE management policy in Australia. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 181, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kilic, H.S.; Cebeci, U.; Ayhan, M.B. Reverse logistics system design for the waste of electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Turkey. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 95, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echegaray, F.; Hansstein, F.V. Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Jang, Y.-C.; Lee, S. Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, M.C.B. Gestão de Resíduos Plásticos Pós-Consumo: Perspectivas para a Reciclagem no Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ghisolfi, V.; de Chaves, G.L.D.; Siman, R.R.; Xavier, L.H. System dynamics applied to closed loop supply chains of desktops and laptops in Brazil: A perspective for social inclusion of waste pickers. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leite, P.R. Reverse Logistics: Environment and Competitiveness; Prentice Hall: São Paulo, Brazil, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Brazilian Industrial Development Agency. Reverse Logistics of Electronic Equipment Technical and Economic Feasibility Analysis. 2013. Available online: http://www.abdi.com.br/Estudo/Logisticareversaderesiduos_pdf (accessed on 2 March 2019).
- Rogers, D.S.; Tibben-Lembke, R.S. Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices Going; Reverse Logistics Executive Council: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Ylä-Mella, J.; Poikela, K.; Lehtinen, U.; Keiski, R.L.; Pongrácz, E. Implementation of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive in Finland: Evaluation of the collection network and challenges of the effective WEEE management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 86, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jayaraman, V.; Luo, Y. Creating Competitive Advantages Through New Value Creation: A Reverse Logistics Perspective. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2007, 21, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ylä-Mella, J.; Keiski, R.L.; Pongrácz, E. Electronic waste recovery in Finland: Consumers’ perceptions towards recycling and re-use of mobile phones. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews; A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=OCDE/GD(93)179&docLanguage=En (accessed on 2 March 2019).
- Nicholas, J.C. Elementos Econômicos da Gerência do Crescimento in Conflitos Jurídicos, Econô Micos e Ambientais–Estratégias para o Desenvolvimento de Políticas Ambientais e de uso do solo. um Estudo de caso da Flórida (EUA) e Paraná (Brazil); EDUEM: Maringá, Brazil, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo, G.J.P. Relação de Consumo, Defesa da Economia e Meio Ambiente. In Curso Interdisciplinar de Direito Ambiente; Arlindo, P.J., Alaôr Caffé, A., Eds.; Manole: Barueri, Brazil, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lindhqvist, T. Extended Producer Responsibility in Cleaner Production; Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Ikhlayel, M. Environmental impacts and benefits of state-of-the-art technologies for E-waste management. Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 458–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, C.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, G.; Li, X. Heavy metal contamination in soils and vegetables near an e-waste processing site, south China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tansel, B. From electronic consumer products to e-wastes: Global outlook, waste quantities, recycling challenges. Environ. Int. 2017, 98, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Holuszko, M.; Espinosa, D.C.R. E-waste: An overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calderoni, S. Os Bilhões Perdidos no Lixo, 6th ed.; Humanitas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ushizima, M.M.; Marins, F.A.S.; Muniz Jr, J. Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos: Cenário da Legislação Brazileira com Foco nos Resíduos Eletroeletrônicos. In Proceedings of the XI Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia: Gestão do Conhecimento para a Sociedade, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22–24 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks—The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Pope, J.; Annandale, D.; Morrison-Saunders, A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2004, 24, 595–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garcia, C.O.; Motta, J.M.T.; Carvalho, F.N.F.; Ribeiro, R.C.S.; Gomes, S.M.S.; Gomes, W.A. Mapeamento de impactos sociais e ambientais: O caso de uma distribuidora de energia elétrica. In Proceedings of the Congresso Internacional Sustentabilidade Ambiental e a Industria Eléctrica, Medellín, Colombia, 13–15 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Merino, E.A.D.; Figueiredo, L.F.; Jacomel, B.; Palmieri, A.R.; Ogawa, C.; Campos, L.M.S. Entidades regulatórias como o atendimento às demandas sociais quanto ao desenvolvimento sustentável. In Proceedings of the Anais do Seminário Internacional sobre Resíduos de Equipamentos Eletroeletrônicos—SIREE, Recife, Brazil, 5–7 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, J.C. Gestão Ambiental Empresarial: Conceitos, Modelos e Instrumentos, 3rd ed.; Saraiva: São Paulo, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Helmann, K.S.; Marçal, R.F.M. Método Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão na Gestão da Manutenção: Aplicação do Método ELECTRE I na Seleção de Equipamentos Críticos para Processo. Rev. Gestão Ind. 2007, 3, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, P.; Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, M.A.; Souza, L.T.F. Método Multicritério TOPSIS Aplicado à Satisfação de Usuários de Smartphones com os Sistemas Operacionais Android, iOS e Windows Phone. Rev. Sist. Informação FSMA 2017, 20, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
- Rangel, L.A.D.; Gomes, L.F.A.M.; Cardoso, F.P. An application of the TODIM method to the evaluation of Broadband Internet plans. Pesqui. Oper. 2011, 31, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S. Facility Location Selection using PROMETHEE II Method. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 9–10 January 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Rousis, K.; Moustakas, K.; Malamis, S.; Papadopoulos, A.; Loizidou, M. Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1941–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, W.-C.; Hong, I.-H. Selecting an E-Scrap Reverse Production System Design Considering Multicriteria and Uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 2008, 31, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.W.; Hu, A.H. Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, R.J.; Wang, Y.C.; Tien, F.C. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shih, H.-S.; Stanley Lee, E.; Chuang, S.-H.; Chen, C.-C. A forecasting decision on the sales volume of printers in Taiwan: An exploitation of the Analytic Network Process. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64, 1545–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zafeirakopoulos, I.B.; Genevois, M.E. An Analytic Network Process approach for the environmental aspect selection problem —A case study for a hand blender. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2015, 54, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cid-López, A.; Hornos, M.J.; Carrasco, R.A.; Herrera-Viedma, E. SICTQUAL: A fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria model to assess the quality of service in the ICT sector from the user perspective. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 37, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Almeida, A.T. Decision Making Process in Organizations: Building Multicriteria Decision Models; Atlas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Roy, B. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
- Danielson, M.; Ekenberg, L. A Robustness Study of State-of-the-Art Surrogate Weights for MCDM. Group Decis. Negot. 2017, 26, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Almeida, A.T.; de Almeida, J.A.; Costa, A.P.C.S.; de Almeida-Filho, A.T. A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 250, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keeney, R.L.; Raiffa, H. Decision Making with Multiple Objectives, Preferences and Value Trade-Offs; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- de Almeida-Filho, A.T.; de Almeida, A.T.; Costa, A.P.C.S. A flexible elicitation procedure for additive model scale constants. Ann. Oper. Res. 2017, 259, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frej, E.A.; Roselli, L.R.P.; de Almeida, J.A.; de Almeida, A.T. A Multicriteria Decision Model for Supplier Selection in a Food Industry Based on FITradeoff Method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 2017, 4541914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasca, J.E.; Ensslin, L.; Rolim Ensslin, S.; Alves, M.B.M. An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 2010, 34, 631–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacso, P. As we may search—Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Curr. Sci. 2005, 89, 1537–1547. [Google Scholar]
- Lima Junior, F.; Ferreira, L.F.F.; Seleghim, A.P.D.; Carpinetti, L.C.R. Um modelo fuzzy-qfd para priorização de ações de gestão de resíduos de equipamentos eletroeletrônicos. Revista Produção Online 2018, 18, 713–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khetriwal, D.S.; Kraeuchi, P.; Widmer, R. Producer responsibility for e-waste management: Key issues for consideration—Learning from the Swiss experience. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prakah, C.; Barua, M.K. Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J. Manuf. Syst. 2015, 37, 599–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, B.; Guarnieri, P.; Silva, L.C.; Alfinito, S. Prioritizing Barriers to Be Solved to the Implementation of Reverse Logistics of E-Waste in Brazil under a Multicriteria Decision Aid Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, B.; Guarnieri, P.; Nofal, R.; Nofal, B. Multi-Criteria Methods Applied in the Studies of Barriers Identified in the Implementation of Reverse Logistics of E-Waste: A Research Agenda. Logistics 2020, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajapati, H.; Kant, R.; Shankar, R. Prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics implementation to mitigate its barriers: A hybrid modified SWARA and WASPAS approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Authors | MCDA Method | Scope |
---|---|---|
Rousis et al. [57] | Promethee | Compares alternative systems for the management of WEEE in Cyprus. |
Chen and Hong [58] | Multicriteria method proposed by the researchers | Selects reverse logistics infrastructure projects for recycled materials. |
Hsu and Hu [59] | Analytic network process (ANP) | It presents an analytical network process (ANP) approach to incorporate hazardous substance management (HSM) in the selection of suppliers and uses a consumer electronics company as a demonstration. |
Kuo, Tien and Wang [60] | Analytic Network Process (ANP) | The authors identified the primary indicators used to select a “green supplier through a literature review”. |
Shih et al. [61] | Analytic Network Process (ANP) | Applies the ANP to predict the volume of printer sales in Taiwan to adjust the rate of recycling and treatment as an incentive for the recycling industries. |
Zafeirakopoulos and Genevois [62] | Analytic Network Process (ANP) | It uses the ANP to select the most relevant environmental aspect for small companies that do not have the capital and time to use Life Cycle Assessment to support the decision-making processes used in eco-design and sustainable production. |
Groups of Criteria | Criteria | Authors |
---|---|---|
Social | Harmony of the proposal with current WEEE legislation | Rousis et al. [57]; Kuo; Tien and Wang [60] |
Social Acceptance | ||
Job creation | ||
Disclosure of information | ||
Environmental | Impact level | Rousis et al. [57]; Kuo, Tien and Wang [60]; Zafeirakopoulos and Genevois [62] |
Emission of Pollutants | ||
Generation of Liquid Waste | ||
Solid Waste Generation | ||
ISO 14001 certification | ||
Economics | Investment cost | Rousis et al. [57]; Chen and Hong [58]; Kuo, Tien and Wang [60] |
Operation and maintenance cost | ||
Financial feedback | ||
Industry Pricing Compliance | ||
Technical | Management System Quality | Rousis et al. [57]; Hsu and Hu [59]; Kuo, Tien and Wang [60]; Lima Junior et al. [74] |
Functionality | ||
existing experience | ||
Adaptability to local conditions | ||
Flexibility | ||
Order Fulfillment Fee | ||
technical difficulty |
Criteria | Objective (Max/Min) | |
---|---|---|
C1 | Adaptability to current legislation | Maximize |
C2 | Impact of social acceptance | Maximize |
C3 | Job creation | Maximize |
C4 | Impact in decreasing incorrect disposal | Maximize |
C5 | Level of possible environmental impacts | Minimise |
C6 | Investment cost | Minimize |
C7 | Operation and maintenance cost | Minimize |
C8 | Technical difficulty | Minimize |
C9 | Adaptability to local conditions | Maximize |
C10 | Functionalism | Maximize |
Cycle | Consequence A | Consequence B | Preference | Ranking Levels | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C1 | X1 = 4 | C10 | B10 = 4 | A | 1 |
2 | C1 | X1 = 4 | C2 | B2 = 5 | A | 1 |
3 | C2 | X2 = 4 | C3 | B3 = 2 | A | 1 |
4 | C3 | X3 = 4 | C4 | B4 = 2 | A | 1 |
5 | C4 | X4 = 4 | C5 | B5 = 4 | A | 1 |
6 | C5 | X5 = 3 | C6 | B6 = 5 | A | 1 |
7 | C6 | X6 = 4 | C7 | B7 = 5 | A | 1 |
8 | C7 | X7 = 4 | C8 | B8 = 4 | A | 1 |
9 | C8 | X8 = 3 | C9 | B9 = 2 | A | 1 |
10 | C9 | X9 = 4 | C10 | B10 = 4 | B | 1 |
11 | C1 | X1 = 4 | C2 | B2 = 5 | A | 8 |
12 | C2 | X2 = 3 | C3 | B3 = 2 | A | 9 |
13 | C3 | X3 = 4 | C4 | B4 = 2 | A | 9 |
14 | C4 | X4 = 4 | C5 | B5 = 4 | A | 10 |
Ranking | Alternative | |
---|---|---|
1st | 1 | Door to door collection by the city hall |
2nd | 4 | Collection points at technical assistance stores |
3rd | 8 | Conduct a study to assess people’s preference for the disposal of certain products and create a collection strategy based on them |
4th | 5 | City hall pickup with schedule |
5th | 2 | Door to door collection by waste pickers |
6 th | 3 | Collection points at EEE stores |
7 th | 10 | Study the dynamics of financial incentives offered to people wishing to discard WEEE |
8 th | 9 | Make mass educational advertisements about EPR and about WEEE |
9 th | 6 | Special bins scattered in strategic locations/Voluntary Delivery Points |
10 th | 7 | Public participation that promotes the expansion of knowledge and awareness about proper WEEE disposal |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fernandes, C.H.d.A.; Silva, L.C.e.; Guarnieri, P.; Vieira, B.d.O. Multicriteria Model Proposition to Support the Management of Systems of E-Waste Collection. Logistics 2021, 5, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030060
Fernandes CHdA, Silva LCe, Guarnieri P, Vieira BdO. Multicriteria Model Proposition to Support the Management of Systems of E-Waste Collection. Logistics. 2021; 5(3):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030060
Chicago/Turabian StyleFernandes, Ciro Henrique de Araújo, Lucio Camara e Silva, Patricia Guarnieri, and Bárbara de Oliveira Vieira. 2021. "Multicriteria Model Proposition to Support the Management of Systems of E-Waste Collection" Logistics 5, no. 3: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030060