Next Article in Journal
Rapid Evaluation of Wet Gluten Content in Wheat Using Hyperspectral Technology Combined with Machine Learning Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Controlling Off-Odors in Plant Proteins Using Sequential Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shelf Life Prediction of Longan with Intermediate Moisture Using Osmotic Dehydration, Combined with Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures

by
Hong Phuc Vu Le
1,
Napapan Chokumnoyporn
2,
Jurmkwan Sangsuwan
1,
Witoon Prinyawiwatkul
3 and
Sujinda Sriwattana
1,*
1
Faculty of Agro–Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand
2
Culinary Art and Kitchen Management Division, Faculty of Science, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
3
School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University, Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2026, 15(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010040
Submission received: 16 October 2025 / Revised: 19 November 2025 / Accepted: 16 December 2025 / Published: 23 December 2025

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the shelf life of intermediate moisture longan (IML). A hurdle technology approach was applied, combining osmotic dehydration (OD), hot-air drying, and packaging methods: aluminum foil-laminated plastic bags with nitrogen flushing (Al bag with nitrogen), aluminum foil-laminated plastic bags without nitrogen (the Al bag without nitrogen), and clear plastic bags. Samples were stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C for 24 weeks (six months). The combination of these preservation techniques was effective in extending the shelf life of IML products. Quality changes in IML during storage were significantly influenced by packaging type, storage temperature, and storage duration (p ≤ 0.05). Products stored in all three types of packaging at low temperatures retained better color (L* 31.92 ± 0.97–32.67 ± 1.47) and higher sensory scores (6.5 ± 1.4–6.6 ± 1.5) compared to those stored at higher temperatures (L* 19.54 ± 1.00–20.90 ± 1.48, 3.3 ± 1.6–4.1 ± 1.7). Accelerated shelf life testing using the Arrhenius equation was applied to predict changes in color and sensory acceptance. The kinetics of these quality changes followed the first-order reaction models. Among the packaging types, IML stored in Al bags with nitrogen exhibited the lowest rate constants, indicating slower quality deterioration and better protection compared to Al bags without nitrogen and clear plastic bags. The predictive model demonstrated strong agreement with the experimental data, accurately predicting shelf life at 25 °C and above. However, the model projected a potential shelf life of up to 58 weeks for IML samples packaged in aluminum bags with nitrogen and stored at 4 °C; this projection extended beyond the 24-week experimental period, which still verified a minimum shelf life of 24 weeks. This technology reduces post-harvest food loss, advances packaging innovation for agro-industry, and strengthens food security.

1. Introduction

Extending the shelf life of fruits and vegetables while maintaining their quality is a major challenge in food preservation. Several methods have been applied to slow enzymatic browning and microbial decay, which are the main causes of deterioration. Among them, drying or dehydration remains one of the oldest and most effective preservation techniques [1]. In particular, osmotic dehydration (OD) has gained attention because it reduces moisture content and water activity to the range of 0.6–0.84 by immersing products in aqueous solutions containing one or more solutes [2,3,4,5]. Intermediate moisture foods (aw ≈ 0.6) are meant to be soft, chewy, and palatable without refrigeration. At this aw, microbial spoilage is prevented and good texture is maintained (not too hard, like fully dried fruit). So, 0.6 is a balance between safety, stability, and sensory quality. This process not only partially removes water but also improves stability against microbial growth and enzymatic activity. The addition of citric acid to osmotic solutions has been successfully used to inhibit enzymatic browning in longan fruit [6]. Moreover, when combined with hot-air drying, OD can significantly reduce drying time, lower energy consumption, and improve the quality of fruits and vegetables during storage [7,8,9,10].
Shelf life is generally defined as the period between food production and packaging and the point at which the product becomes unacceptable under given storage conditions [11]. To predict and evaluate shelf life, chemical kinetic models are widely used to describe quality changes during storage. The Arrhenius relationship has been applied to explain the effect of temperature on reaction rate constants [12] and to determine activation energy values for food quality losses [13]. Such approaches have been applied to modeling color and pH changes in bulk tomato paste containing olive leaf extract, color change in dried pomegranate arils during microwave–vacuum drying, and quality attributes of dried longan obtained through osmotic dehydration [14,15,16].
Alongside processing methods, packaging also plays a crucial role in extending shelf life. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), vacuum packaging, and shrink packaging are among the most common approaches [17]. Carbon dioxide, oxygen, and nitrogen are frequently used gases in MAP [18]. For example, carica seed powder stored in aluminum foil-laminated bags had a predicted shelf life of over one year under room temperature accelerated storage conditions [19]. Similarly, vacuum-dried coconut milk powder packed in aluminum foil-laminated polyethylene had a predicted shelf life of 30 days at 38 ± 2 °C [20]. For dried pomegranate arils, aluminum foil-laminated bags provided better protection compared with high-density polyethylene during accelerated storage [21]. These studies highlight the importance of selecting suitable packaging materials to maximize shelf life.
Longan (Dimocarpus longan L.), a fruit belonging to the family Sapindaceae, is a significant fruit crop, particularly in Southeast Asia. Thailand and Vietnam are the world’s leading producers and exporters. The longan production in eight northern provinces of Thailand in the year 2025 is approximately 1,064,242 tons. The Ministry of Commerce plans to export 15,000 tons of fresh longan and produce 50,000 tons of dried longan. Longan is highly perishable, with its short storage life mainly limited by pericarp browning and microbial decay [22,23,24]. The fungal pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae is reported as the most severe cause of decay in longan fruit [25]. Under normal conditions, longans can be stored for only a few days at 30 °C or up to 30 days at 4–5 °C after harvest [26]. Drying or other processing techniques can prolong the fruits’ storage life. Dried longan is a highly valued product commonly used in snacks, desserts, and traditional Chinese medicine. The main deterioration of dried longan is primarily moisture re-absorption and subsequent microbial spoilage, especially by yeast and mold, followed by quality degradation by, for instance, browning. Intermediate moisture longan requires precise partial drying or osmotic dehydration with preservatives and moisture-proof packaging, while fully dried longan involves a longer, higher-temperature drying to achieve very low moisture levels and robust packaging to prevent quality loss. Intermediate moisture longan is soft, pliable, and chewy, like fresh raisin, allowing it to be eaten as a ready-to-eat snack. Fully dried longan is hard, brittle, and leathery, sometimes requiring rehydration before consumption, as it has the texture of a hard, dried chip. Therefore, integrating osmotic dehydration with appropriate packaging and storage conditions could provide an effective solution to extend the shelf life of intermediate moisture longans (IMLs), preserving product quality and sensory attributes, facilitating market expansion, and reducing economic losses and food waste.
The prediction of shelf life for intermediate moisture foods (IMFs) has traditionally relied on water activity (aw) as the primary determinant of microbial stability [10]. Consequently, most existing models assume that shelf life is limited by microbial spoilage. However, a critical research gap exists for IMF products in which chemical and physical degradations, rather than microbial growth, become the dominant shelf life-limiting factors [27]. Specifically for intermediate moisture longan (IML), our preliminary observations indicated that aw was not the crucial determinant of shelf life; instead, consumer rejection was primarily driven by color deterioration associated with non-enzymatic browning. Some previous studies validated kinetic models linking a browning rate to sensory acceptability, but these approaches have rarely been applied to IMF systems. Therefore, the current study addressed this gap by moving beyond the aw-centric perspective to develop a sensory-driven shelf life prediction model. The kinetic parameters of browning serve as a critical quality index directly correlated with consumer acceptance, providing a practical and mechanistic basis for predicting the shelf life of IML according to its true failure mode [27].
The objective of this study was to evaluate the shelf life of IMLs produced by osmotic dehydration and subsequently stored in different packaging types at different storage temperatures for six months.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Intermediate Moisture Longan Preparation

The longan fruits were purchased from Thongpoon Food Limited Partnership (Lamphun, Thailand) and delivered to faculty of Agro–Industry, Chiang Mai University within one day. After arriving, the fruits were cleaned, deseeded, and peeled. According to Layeghinia et al. [28], osmotic solutions for fruits and vegetables may include salt, sugar, sorbitol, and glycerol. In this study, the peeled longan fruits were then immersed in the osmotic solution [29], containing sugar solution (40% sucrose/glycerol/sorbitol solution at the ratio of 2:1:1, constituting 40% (w/v) of the total solution), potassium sorbate (0.1%), and citric acid (1%). In the preparation of the osmotic solution, 5% of the total water was used to dissolve potassium sorbate and citric acid. Subsequently, sucrose was dissolved in the remaining water according to the formulation, followed by the addition of glycerol and sorbitol. Then, the dissolved citric acid and potassium sorbate were added in the mixture solution and stirred until homogeneous. The fruit-to-solution ratio was 1:2. The treated longan was immersed for 12 h in the air-conditioned room (24 °C) without agitation. The fruits were then taken out of the osmotic solution, drained for 15 min and dried in a hot air oven (Binder oven FD 115, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 60 °C with an air velocity of 0.5 m/s for 8 h to bring the water activity down to 0.6. Then, the intermediate moisture longan (IML) products were kept in three different types of packaging: aluminum foil-laminated plastic bag flushed with nitrogen (Al bag with nitrogen), aluminum foil-laminated plastic bag flushed without nitrogen or air pack (Al bag without nitrogen), and clear plastic bag (polyamide) with an air pack. In order to accelerate physicochemical reactions, IML samples were stored at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) and the quality of IML samples from different treatments were evaluated for physicochemical properties, microbial quality, and sensory acceptance at various time intervals. All packages were visually inspected for seal integrity after heat sealing, and the ones with visible defects were discarded.

2.2. Physicochemical Properties

Water activity (aw) was analyzed in triplicate using a Water activity analyzer (Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA). Two grams of the sample were placed in a water activity sample cup. The measurement was conducted in a controlled-temperature room at 23 °C. Water activity sample cups were equilibrated by placing the samples in the 23 °C room. Moisture content (MC) was analyzed in triplicate by a vacuum oven at 70 °C [30]. A colorimeter (Konica Minolta Chroma Meter, CR-410, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the color parameters of the 10 samples from each treatment and expressed as L*, a*, b*. The colorimeter was standardized with a white calibration plate (L* = 85.4, a* = 0.3176, and b* = 0.3341). The following colorimeter settings were used: a mode of D65 and a 0 °C viewing.
The hardness was evaluated by a penetration test using a Texture Analyzer model TA–XT2i (Texture Technologies, Inc., Godalming, UK). The penetration probe of 2 mm in diameter was applied. The pre-test speed was set at 1 mm/s, with a distance of 15 mm/s and an acquisition rate of 400 points/s. The measurement was determined in 10 replications for each sample.

2.3. Microbial Analysis

Total bacterial count (TBC), yeast and mold count (YMC), and Escherichia coli count at day 0 were determined as described by AOAC [31] to assess food safety, measure the effectiveness of the osmotic process in reducing microbial load, and monitor for spoilage-causing organisms. These tests help ensure that the product is safe to eat, has an acceptable shelf life, and meets regulatory standards by identifying the presence of pathogenic bacteria like E. coli and spoilage microorganisms like yeasts and molds, which can grow even under high-sugar conditions. Individual IML samples (10 g) were aseptically homogenized with 90 mL of peptone water (0.1%) using a stomacher for 1 min. Serial dilutions were made in 9 mL peptone water (0.1%) and pour plate was performed in duplicate. The media employed were Plate Count Agar (PCA), Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Lactose Broth (LSB) and Brilliant Green Lactose Bile Broth (BLGBB) for determination of TBC, YMC, and E. coli, respectively. The PCA plates were incubated at 35 °C for 48 h, the PDA plates were incubated at 25 °C for 72 h, and the LSB and BGLB tubes were incubated at 35 °C for 24–48 h [32]. The growth colonies were counted at the end of the incubation time and expressed as colony forming units per gram (cfu/g) of sample. The microbial analyses of IML samples were undertaken periodically during storage.

2.4. Consumer Acceptance

The consumer acceptance test was carried out every 3 weeks, according to the standard procedure [33], (N = 50 consumers) using a 9–point hedonic scale (1= “dislike extremely”, 5 = “neither like nor dislike”, 9 = “like extremely”). The sensory attributes considered were overall acceptability, color, and flavor. Samples (10 g of IML samples) were identified using a three-digit random number and served following the randomized complete block design (RCBD).

2.5. Accelerated Shelf Life Testing Procedure and Kinetics Calculations

To determine the reaction order, zero and first-order equations were applied separately, and the instrumental color values and consumer acceptance scores of color were plotted as a function of storage time. Thus, the linear regression and exponential plots were carried out for these values, corresponding to the values of k (reaction velocity) by zero (Equation (1)) and first- (Equation (2)) order equations for each temperature [21].
Q = Q o k t
l n   Q Q o = k t
where Q0 represents the initial value of a quality attribute and Q is the value of that attribute at time t.
As the quality parameters followed zero or first-order reactions, Equations (3) and (4) were used to predict the time (ts) that is needed for changes in color and consumer acceptance scores of color indices [21].
t s = Q o     Q e   k
t s = l n Q o Q e   k
where ts is the time predicted for these changes to happen. The acceptance threshold (Qe) or the reject point was when the consumer acceptance score in this shelf life study was less than 5.

2.6. Water Vapor Permeability of Bags

Water vapor permeability of the Al bag and clear plastic bag were determined using a Water Vapor Transmission Rate Tester (C303H, LABTHINK, Jinan, China) at a temperature of 38 °C and 50% relative humidity (RH). Two replicates were measured for each sample.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

A factorial design experiment in completely randomized design was conducted in this study. The main factors were different storage temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C). A temperature of 4 °C acts as a stable control for the baseline comparison, 25 °C simulates the real-world ambient storage condition, and the elevated temperatures (35 °C and 45 °C) accelerate degradation to rapidly predict shelf life and test the product’s stability under extreme abuse. Three different types of packaging (Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen and clear plastic bag) were used. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out by using the SPSS version 16.0.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Quality Changes in IML During Storage Time

To estimate the quality changes in IML products during storage time, the IML products were kept in three different kinds of packaging, including an Al bag with nitrogen, an Al bag without nitrogen, and a clear plastic bag, and stored at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) for 24 weeks. Overall, the temperatures of storage and packaging types were the major factors that influenced the changes in physical, chemical, and sensory properties of IML samples during storage.

3.1.1. Water Activity (aw) and Moisture Contents (MCs)

The aw and MC of the IML samples are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. From the ANOVA results (see Supplementary Materials), the temperatures of storage and packaging types were significant factors affecting the water activity and moisture content of longan samples (p ≤ 0.05). Regardless of the storage temperatures, the IML samples packed in the Al bag with nitrogen maintained an aw between 0.6 and 0.7 (Figure 1). In contrast, the aw of the samples stored in clear plastic bags at 35 and 45 °C drastically dropped over time, while for those stored at 4 and 25 °C, the aw gradually increased and reached a value of 0.72 after 24 weeks of storage (Figure 1). The aw values of the samples packed in an Al bag without nitrogen or a clear plastic bag stored at 35 and 45 °C were not measured after 16 weeks due to unacceptable consumer acceptance scores. Similar trends were observed for the changes in MC (Figure 2), except for the effects of storage temperatures on MC for the samples packed in Al with nitrogen. The initial MC of samples after processing was 23.58 ± 1.68% (w.b.). The MC of the samples stored at 4 or 25 °C increased, while it decreased for those stored at 35 and 45 °C. (Figure 2). Without exception, the MCs of all samples stored at 35 and 45 °C were not measured after 16 weeks (Figure 2) due to unacceptable consumer acceptance scores.
According to the ANOVA results, the storage temperature and packaging type within the storage period significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected the aw and MC of IML samples. A similar observation was reported by Panwar et al. [34] for the intermediate moisture aonla (Phyllanthus emblica L.) segments, which were packed in low–density polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature for 6 months. Regardless of the packaging types, the aw and MC of IML samples stored at 35 °C and 45 °C tended to decrease during 16 weeks of storage due to the phenomenon of evaporation occurring inside these packages. Aluminum is known to provide good gas and moisture barrier properties, especially when used with nitrogen [35]. The WVP of the clear polyamide bag was 4.816 × 10−15 ± 0.014 g·cm/(cm2·Pa s), while that of the Al bag was 1.964 × 10−17 ± 0.121 g·cm/(cm2·Pa s). As expected, the Al bag with nitrogen could retain MC better than the others (Figure 2).
Depending on the storage temperature, IMLs packed in a clear plastic bag gained or lost moisture content due to the higher water vapor permeability (WVP) of this bag compared with the Al bag. An increase in moisture content of IML during storage at 4 °C and 25 °C was observed. This might be attributed to the internal moisture migration and redistribution driven by the temperature gradients [36]. The equilibrium moisture content of IML is temperature-dependent and increases as the temperature decreases. The product’s capacity to hold water increases at lower temperatures, leading to the absorption of vapor from the package headspace. The higher WVP of the clear plastic bag compared to that of the aluminum-laminated bag also facilitated the moisture transfer from the external environment, hence a higher moisture content. This underscores that for IML, packaging permeability can influence product stability, not only by preventing moisture loss but also by modulating moisture gain under specific temperature–humidity conditions.

3.1.2. Microbial Analysis

There was no microorganism growth until the 16th week, 12th week, and 8th week for IML products packed into the Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen, and clear plastic bag and stored at 4 °C, respectively. Correspondingly, these growths increased at the 24th week, 16th week, and 12th week until the end of storage, respectively. As the shelf life of IML products packed in three different types packaging and stored at 35 °C and 45 °C ended at the 20th week due to unacceptable consumer acceptance scores (<5.0), the microbial analyses were not performed. According to the Microbiological Guidelines for Food [35], the satisfactory total number of bacteria in an aerobic environment in moderate temperature, i.e., “Aerobic colony count,” for sweet foods is <104 cfu/g products. In this study, the IML samples stored at 4 °C and 25 °C had a TBC lower than the standard (104 cfu/g). In addition, it could clearly be seen that YMC and E. coli were not detected in all samples at all storage temperatures over a period 6 months in this study (Table 1).
The combination of the OD drying method with packaging conditions improved the microbial stability and delayed the growth of microbes. The reduction in microbial growth and the improved shelf life can be attributed not solely to osmotic dehydration, but also to the preservative action of potassium sorbate. Saxena et al. [37] reported that TBC and YMC can be detected in intermediate moisture pineapple (aw = 0.82) packed in high-density polyethylene bags and stored at ambient temperature at 2 × 102 cfu/g at 20 days of storage. Furthermore, Chaturvedi et al. [38] found the TBC and YMC in intermediate moisture carrot (aw = 0.6) packed in polyethylene bags and stored at ambient temperature to be 2.1 × 102 cfu/g and 2.08 × 102 cfu/g, respectively. In this study, aw of IML packed in the Al bag with nitrogen was in the range of 0.6–0.7 for the whole storage time at 4–45 °C. The highest value of TBC (6.5 × 10 cfu/g) and YMC (<2.5 × 10−1 cfu/g) were found after storage for 24 weeks. These values are significantly lower than those reported by Chaturvedi et al., likely due to the limited oxygen in the Al bag with nitrogen compared with the polyethylene bag, which was more oxygen-permeable. The aw is an important parameter that can affect microbial count and is important for the shelf life of intermediate moisture products [8]. Homhuan [39] reported that yeast and mold were not detected in dried longan, which was produced using OD and packed in aluminum foil-laminated plastic bags with nitrogen. Moreover, the Microbiological Guidelines for Food [35] state that E. coli is a commonly used fecal indicator organism. Its presence in food generally indicates direct or indirect fecal contamination. A substantial number of E. coli in food implies a general lack of cleanliness in handling and improper storage. The satisfactory total number of E. coli present in food is <20 cfu/g. In this study, the IML products were safe for human consumption as E. coli was absent. In general, the microbial counts were only detected at the 24th week for IML packed in an Al bag with nitrogen, at the 16th week for IML packed in an Al bag without nitrogen and at the 12th week for IML packed in clear plastic bag stored at 4 °C over a period of 6 months of storage. In fact, nitrogen is a useful filler gas to prevent package collapse caused by carbon dioxide dissolving in the food [40]. Carbon dioxide inhibits the growth of many spoilage bacteria, and nitrogen indirectly helps to slow down the growth of aerobic spoilage microbes in unpreserved foods [40]. Therefore, in this study, when IML products were packed in an Al bag with nitrogen, the microbial safety was enhanced and most effective, followed by IML products packed in an Al bag without nitrogen and a clear plastic bag. Finally, IML products packed in an Al bag with nitrogen could be kept longer than the others.

3.1.3. Color Analysis

Color changes in IML samples during storage can clearly be seen in Figure 3. The ANOVA results showed that storage temperature and packaging type within the storage period significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected the color values of IML (see Supplementary Materials). During storage, L* and b* values generally decreased (darker and less yellow color), while the a* value increased (redder color). Temperature was the most critical factor accelerating color changes. This was due to the increased rates of chemical reactions like Maillard browning and non-enzymatic oxidation. ΔE values of IML stored at 4 °C increased gradually, reaching a maximum of ~15.0–15.7 after 24 weeks. At 25 °C, ΔE values were significantly higher than at 4 °C, reaching up to ~16.6–21.7 after 24 weeks. The clear plastic bag showed the most drastic increase. At 35 °C and 45 °C, the browning was rapid and severe. ΔE climbed to extremely high levels (19.6–24.0) by week 16, representing an obvious color change that would make the product unacceptable to consumers. The Al bag with nitrogen provided the best protection. The nitrogen flush displaced oxygen, drastically slowing down oxidative reactions. The initial L* value was 40.6 ± 1.73. After 16 weeks of storage, the L* values of IML in the aluminum foil-laminated bags with nitrogen at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C decreased to 31.92 ± 0.97, 27.99 ± 1.53, 19.55 ± 0.89, and 19.54 ± 1.00, respectively. Overall, storage at 4 °C maintained the color of IML samples more effectively than at other storage temperatures.
Color is a very essential quality characteristic of fruit and vegetable products because it influences consumer acceptability [41]. The browning reaction in this study was non-enzymatic browning reaction, possibly a Maillard reaction and ascorbic acid oxidation, because the longan contained reducing sugar, amino acids, and ascorbic acid. The Maillard reaction is caused by the interaction between free sugar content and free amino acid content in longan fruits during drying [42,43]. The amount of free sugar in the longan flesh is presented in the order of glucose, maltose, sucrose, xylose, and fructose, while the quantities of some of the amino acids, such as proline and leucine, significantly decrease after drying [43]. Browning in dried longan fruit during storage is primarily caused by the Maillard reaction, a form of non-enzymatic browning that requires oxygen and occurs most rapidly at an aw of between 0.6 and 0.7. It can be delayed by storing the product at low temperatures and avoiding oxygen by nitrogen flushing to replace the oxygen inside the package [44]. Therefore, the use of an Al bag with nitrogen, which displaces oxygen with an inert nitrogen, effectively slows the progression of the Maillard reaction. Moreover, the rate of the Maillard reaction increased as the heating temperature increased [45]. Therefore, L* and b* values of IML stored at 35 °C and 45 °C decreased faster than those of IML stored at 4 °C and 25 °C. Moreover, Wangchareon [46] found that the Maillard reaction could occur between carbonyl groups and amino compounds, while ascorbic acid oxidation could be the thermal decomposition of ascorbic acid. Wall [44] reported that longan fruit had the highest ascorbic acid content (60.1 mg/100 g fresh weight) among the three fruits, longan, lychee, and rambutan.

3.1.4. Textural Analysis

Figure 4 shows the changes in texture hardness (N) of IML samples stored in different packaging and storage temperature over a period of 6 months. According to the ANOVA results (see Supplementary Materials), the effects of storage temperature and packaging within the storage period on the texture of IML samples were significant (p ≤ 0.05). In general, the effect of the interaction between storage temperature and packaging within the storage period on the hardness characteristic of IML samples was not significant (p > 0.05). The hardness of the intermediate moisture longan (IML) increased over time during storage. At higher storage temperatures (35 °C and 45 °C), the hardness increased drastically during the first 8 weeks. In addition, the packaging type affected the hardness. IML packed in the aluminum bags, with and without nitrogen, was softer than that packed in the clear plastic bags due to the better moisture protection offered by the aluminum film.
Robertson [47] stated that changes in aw could either inhibit or promote a physical change in the nature of the sugar present in food products, which, in turn, affects the texture. A low aw maintains the sugar in an amorphous form in food products [43]. This amorphous sugar matrix undergoes glass transition [48], contributing to the texture hardening of IML. A decrease in water activity (aw) raises the glass transition temperature (Tg) because water acts as a plasticizer; less water reduces molecular mobility and promotes a glassy, rigid structure. This transition limits diffusion and increases the firmness of the product [49,50,51]. In this study, the texture of IML samples stored at high temperatures was harder than that of samples stored at low temperatures, because the aw of the former IML samples was lower than that of the latter samples (Figure 1 and Figure 4). The hardness of normal dried longan dried in a hot air oven has been found to be 9.76 ± 1.56 (N) and 6.71 ± 1.79 (N) [18,49]. In this study, however, the texture of IML products stored in three different packaging materials was softer than that of normal dried longan. Generally, the hardness of IML products packed in an Al bag with nitrogen was softer than that of IML products packed in an Al bag without nitrogen and a clear plastic bag because aluminum foil provides high reflectivity and high conductivity [43], which can affect the temperature of the food, hence affecting the texture of the food. Therefore, IML products packed in an Al bag with nitrogen could be kept longer than those packed in the other types of packaging used in this study.

3.1.5. Consumer Acceptance

Consumers gave overall acceptance scores ranging from 3.3 (close to dislike moderately) to 6.6 (close to like moderately) (Table 2). The effects of interaction between storage temperature and packaging on the overall acceptability, odor, and color of IML samples were significant (p ≤ 0.05). The sensorial scores of IML at the beginning period were 6.2 ± 1.4 for overall liking, 6.3 ± 1.5 for color testing, and 6.0 ± 1.7 for flavor testing. It can be seen in Table 2 that IML packed in an Al bag with and without nitrogen and clear plastic bags at 4 °C were acceptable during storage time.
In shelf life testing, consumer acceptance could be a determining factor with a testing score of above 5.0 [52]. A study to select the optimal formulation of strawberry–longan bars used acceptability scores of at least 5.6 for appearance and texture [53]. Grosso & Resurreccion [54] reported that on the 9-point hedonic scale, a food sample is considered “neither liked nor disliked” if its overall acceptability score is 5. If a food sample has a value of 4, it means “dislike slightly.” Therefore, values below 5 on the 9-point hedonic scale might be regarded as a threshold for determining if a food item is unsatisfactory to the consumer. In this current study, the shelf life of the IML samples was ended when the sensorial acceptance score was below 5.0. The acceptance scores of IML products packed in the Al bag with nitrogen were higher than those of IML products packed in the Al bag without nitrogen and clear plastic bag during storage. Therefore, the qualities of IML products packed in the Al bag with nitrogen could be maintained longer than those of products packed in other packaging materials.

3.2. Shelf Life Prediction of Intermediate Moisture Longan

The quality changes in IML samples packed and stored in different conditions were clearly observed, especially the changes in color of IML products. These changes were significant according to the storage conditions of storage temperatures and packaging types (p ≤ 0.05). The L* values of IML products continued to decline during storage, which resulted in declined consumer acceptance scores of color. The rejection point for sensory evaluation in this study is a consumer acceptance score of less than 5.0. The linear plot illustrated that the rates of color values and color acceptance changes were constant throughout the storage period, demonstrating the zero order reaction, and the exponential plot between color acceptance scores and storage time represented the first-order reactions. Table 3 and Table 4 show the constant rates of color changes (L* values) and color acceptance changes in IMLs during storage, in which IMLs were packed into an Al bag with nitrogen, an Al bag without nitrogen, and a clear plastic bag and stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C. The kinetics of color change were analyzed using the L* value (lightness) and the consumer color acceptance score. L* values were measured every two weeks for 24 weeks at 4 °C and 25 °C, and for 16 weeks at 35 °C and 45 °C. The color acceptance tests were conducted for up to 24 weeks, or until the product was no longer deemed acceptable by consumers. The accuracy of the rate constant (k) is dependent on the number of data points; a greater number of data points yields a more accurate estimation of k. Based on Table 3 and Table 4, the first-order model with a higher R2 was determined to be more appropriate and was employed for the shelf life prediction. The Arrhenius plot was used to describe how the rate of a chemical reaction depended on storage temperature (Figure 5). It quantitatively showed that the rate of color change increased exponentially as the temperature increased. The rate constant, k, determined the reaction rate. According to this experiment, k values were higher at higher temperatures (35 and 45 °C) than at lower temperatures (25 and 4 °C) in all packaging types. Generally, the first-order reactions could be used to describe the changes in these attributes. The low values of rate constants for all quality parameters for an Al bag with nitrogen in comparison to those for an Al bag without nitrogen and a clear plastic bag indicated that less changes occurred in IML products when they were packed in Al bag with nitrogen compared to the others. It illustrated that the Al bag with nitrogen provided better protection than the other materials. The activation energy (Ea) of IML packed in the Al bag with nitrogen, the Al bag without nitrogen, and the clear plastic bag were 45.74 kJ/mol, 44.85 kJ/mol, and 40.38 kJ/mol, respectively. In addition, the regression equations can be used to estimate the shelf life of IML products by determining the k value at desired temperatures. The shelf life of IML products can be judged via the changes in color acceptability in sensory evaluation. The acceptance score of color was found to be 6.3 at the beginning of storage, and the reject point was 5.0 for IML products. From the results of this study, the stable shelf life of IML products packed into three packages at 4 °C, followed by at 25 °C, could provide good quality of color and high scores of sensory acceptability. The experimental shelf life and predicted shelf life of IML stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C are reported in Table 5. The experimental shelf life of IML in an Al bag with nitrogen at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C was >24, 15, 12, and 3 weeks, respectively. While the predicted shelf life of IML in an Al bag with nitrogen at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C was 58, 14, 7, and 4 weeks, respectively. A direct comparison between the experimentally observed shelf life and the model-predicted shelf life is presented in Table 5. The model demonstrated high accuracy at temperatures of 25 °C and above. Notably, for samples stored at 4 °C, the model predicted a shelf life of 58 weeks for IML packaged in aluminum bag with nitrogen. This value was a model extrapolation, as the experimental observation was terminated at 24 weeks, at which point the product acceptance score of 5.6 (Table 2) still exceeded the minimum acceptability score (a value of 5.0). Therefore, the experimentally confirmed shelf life at 4 °C was at least 24 weeks, while the Arrhenius model provided a theoretical projection of 58 weeks.
The core discrepancy arises because the product’s failure mechanism at 4 °C differs from the higher temperatures used to build the Arrhenius model. At 25-45 °C, spoilage is dominated by rapid chemical reactions like Maillard browning, which are accurately captured by the model. However, the aluminum bag with nitrogen effectively suppresses these reactions at 4 °C. Consequently, the primary mode of failure shifts to slower, less temperature-sensitive processes. This highlights a key limitation of accelerated shelf life studies: the assumption that the same reaction causes failure at all temperatures. Our prediction at 4 °C might deviate from this core ASLS assumption, specifically for the nitrogen-flushed aluminum packaging. Furthermore, predicting 58 weeks is a significant extrapolation from collecting data. Any minor error in the model’s activation energy is greatly magnified in the predicted shelf life. Therefore, while the model is accurate at higher temperatures, its prediction at 4 °C is limited by this change in the failure mechanism.
The previous studies reported that the storage quality of osmotically dehydrated papaya products had remained for up to 6 months at an ambient temperature [8], and banana products were stored up to one year or more, depending on the storage conditions and packaging materials used [55]. In a study by Akharume et al. [56], osmotically dehydrated apples were stored in non-vacuum and vacuum polyethylene packaging. Vacuum packaging was found to improve the stability of both untreated and sugar-infused dried apples at room temperature. However, after 120 days (~17 weeks), the total bacterial count (TBC) for their samples remained between 103 and 104 CFU/g (log 3–4). In contrast, all packaging treatments in our study, particularly the Al bag with nitrogen, achieved lower TBC values of 101–102 CFU/g (log 1–2) after 20 weeks. The superior microbial inhibition in our study was attributed to the oxygen-free environment created by nitrogen flushing in the Al bag, compared to the packages where oxygen was present (the Al bag without nitrogen and the clear plastic bag). Furthermore, the aluminum bags provide a better barrier against oxygen ingress during storage. This was demonstrated by the oxygen permeability values, which were 0.10 ± 0.004 cc/m2·day for the aluminum bags and 95.9 ± 1.4 cc/m2·day for the clear plastic bags (LLDPE/nylon). Furthermore, Jimeno et al. [57] studied that the intermediate moisture mango roll could be packed in aluminum foil with polyethylene (PE) liner and stored for 9 months without any change in aw or product color. In this study, the Al bag with nitrogen was more effective in maintaining the quality of the IML samples than the other packaging, and the storage temperature of 4 °C was most effective in maintaining the quality of the IML.

4. Conclusions

The application of multiple preservation hurdles, namely osmotic dehydration, hot-air drying, packaging type, and storage temperature, was shown to effectively extend the shelf life of IML to 14, 14, and 8 weeks (based on the ASLT) when stored in the aluminum (Al) bag with nitrogen, the Al bag without nitrogen, and the clear plastic bag at 25 °C, respectively. Throughout storage, significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in moisture content, color, and textural attributes were observed as a function of both storage temperature and packaging type. In addition, osmotic dehydration combined with hot-air drying effectively reduced water activity (aw), thereby suppressing microbial growth and maintaining the sensory acceptability of IML products over the entire storage period. The progression of quality changes followed the first-order reaction kinetics, with kinetic rate constants for IML packaged in Al bags with nitrogen (at 25 °C; for L*: k = 1.7 × 10−2 and for acceptance score: k = 0.8 × 10−2) being lower than those of samples stored in the Al bags without nitrogen (for L*: k = 1.8 × 10−2 and for acceptance score: k = 1.7 × 10−2) and the clear plastic bags (for L*: k = 1.9 × 10−2 and for acceptance score: k = 1.8 × 10−2). These findings indicated that the use of Al bags with nitrogen is the most effective strategy for prolonging the shelf life of IML products while minimizing quality deterioration. Future development should focus on optimizing this hurdle technology for a wider range of fruits and vegetables and exploring more sustainable, high-barrier packaging alternatives to aluminum.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods15010040/s1, Table S1: Water activities (aw) of IML packed in Al bag with nitrogen during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S2: Water activities (aw) of IML packed in Al bag without nitrogen during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S3: Water activities (aw) of IML packed in clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S4: Moisture contents of IML packed in Al bag with nitrogen during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S5: Moisture contents of IML packed in Al bag without nitrogen during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S6: Moisture contents of IML packed in clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35 and 45 °C); Table S7: ANOVA for water activities and moisture contents of intermediate moisture longan during storage; Table S8: ANOVA for color analysis of intermediate moisture longan during storage; Table S9: ANOVA for texture analysis of intermediate moisture longan during storage; Table S10: ANOVA for sensory evaluation scores of intermediate moisture longan during storage period.

Author Contributions

H.P.V.L.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft. N.C.: Methodology, investigation, formal analysis, validation, writing—original draft. J.S.: Methodology, investigation (equal); validation and writing—review and editing. W.P.: Methodology, investigation, validation, writing—review and editing. S.S.: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, formal analysis, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Thailand Post Co., Ltd., Thailand and Science and Technology Park, Chiang Mai University (STeP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research was a collaborative effort between Chiang Mai University and the Louisiana State University (LSU) Agricultural Center. The use of human subjects in research was approved by the Institutional Review Board, LSU Agricultural Center (IRBAG# 21-0063).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Thailand Post Co., Ltd. provided financial support for this research. The funding sponsors had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. All authors (Hong Phuc Vu Le, Napapan Chokumnoyporn, Jurmkwan Sangsuwan, WitoonPrinyawiwatkul and Sujinda Sriwattana) declared no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AlAluminum
awWater activity
BLGBBBrilliant Green Lactose Bile Broth
IMLIntermediate Moisture Longan
MAPModified Atmosphere Packaging
MCMoisture Content
ODOsmotic Dehydration
PCAPlate Count Agar 
PDAPotato Dextrose Agar
LSBLactose Broth 
TBCTotal Bacterial Count
YMCYeast and Mold Count

References

  1. Boyer, R.R.; Huff, K. Using Dehydration to Preserve Fruits, Vegetables, and Meats; Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA, USA; Virginia State University: Petersburg, VA, USA, 2009; pp. 348–597. [Google Scholar]
  2. Asghari, A.; Zongo, P.A.; Osse, E.F.; Aghajanzadeh, S.; Raghavan, V.; Khalloufi, S. Review of osmotic dehydration: Promising technologies for enhancing products’ attributes, opportunities, and challenges for the food industries. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mari, A.; Parisouli, D.N.; Krokida, M. Exploring osmotic dehydration for food preservation: Methods, modelling, and modern applications. Foods 2024, 13, 2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saha, S. IMF: To enhance the shelf-life of food. Int. J. Mod. Trends Sci. Technol. 2020, 6, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, K.S.; Fernandes, M.A.; Mauro, M.A. Effect of calcium on the osmotic dehydration kinetics and quality of pineapple. J. Food Eng. 2014, 134, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chavan, U.; Amarowicz, R. Osmotic dehydration process for preservation of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Res. 2012, 1, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Achariyaviriya, A.; Somchart, S.; Tiansuwan, J. Study of longan flesh drying. Dry. Technol. 2001, 19, 2315–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmed, I.; Qazi, I.M.; Jamal, S. Developments in osmotic dehydration technique for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 34, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pavkov, I.; Radojčin, M.; Stamenković, Z.; Kešelj, K.; Tylewicz, U.; Sipos, P.; Ponjičan, O.; Sedlar, A. Effects of Osmotic Dehydration on the Hot Air Drying of Apricot Halves: Drying Kinetics, Mass Transfer, and Shrinkage. Processes 2021, 9, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shrivastava, A.; Gowda, I.D. Development of intermediate-moisture slices of papaya (Carica papaya L.) by hurdle technology. J. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 11, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Awulachew, M.T. Understanding to the shelf-life and product stability of foods. J. Food Technol. 2021, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chung, Y.; Green, W.H. New modified Arrhenius equation to describe the temperature dependence of liquid phase reaction rates. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 516, 163300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lai, D.J.; Heldman, D.R. Analysis of kinetics of quality change in frozen foods 1. J. Food Process Eng. 1982, 6, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dak, M.; Sagar, V.; Jha, S. Shelf-life and kinetics of quality change of dried pomegranate arils in flexible packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2014, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deng, Y.; Lai, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Liu, G.; Tang, X.; Li, P.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wei, Z. Effects of pretreatment methods on the physicochemical properties of dried longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) pulps. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 3474–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ganje, M.; Jafari, S.M.; Dusti, A.; Dehnad, D.; Amanjani, M.; Ghanbari, V. Modeling quality changes in tomato paste containing microencapsulated olive leaf extract by accelerated shelf life testing. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 97, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kohli, D.; Loushigam, G.; Richa, R.; Bajad, R. Recent Advances in Food Packaging for Shelf Life of Food. In Food Production, Diversity, and Safety Under Climate Change; Chakraborty, R., Mathur, P., Roy, S., Eds.; Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma, L.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Gao, Z. Recent developments in novel shelf life extension technologies of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 64, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Astuti, S.D.; Lestari, S.; Widarni, S.; Wijanarko, G.; Wibawa, F.N. Shelf life prediction of carica seeds pow-der using accelerated method. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 653, 012055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jena, S.; Das, H. Shelf life prediction of aluminum foil laminated polyethylene packed vacuum dried coconut milk powder. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Man, C.; Jones, A. Shelf Life Evaluation of Foods; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prasad, K.; Neha, P.; Lal, M.K. Cultivation and post-harvest handling techniques of potential future crop ‘longan’(Dimocarpus longan Lour) in Asia pacific region-A review. Res. Crops 2017, 18, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saengnil, K.; Chumyam, A.; Faiyue, B.; Uthaibutra, J. Use of chlorine dioxide fumigation to alleviate enzymatic browning of harvested ‘Daw’ longan pericarp during storage under ambient conditions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 91, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, L.; Shu, B.; Wei, Y.; Jue, D.; Fu, J.; Xie, J.; Liu, C. Physico-chemical properties of longan fruit during development and ripening. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 207, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Serrato-Diaz, L.M.; Rivera-Vargas, L.I.; Goenaga, R.; French-Monar, R.D. First report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae causing inflorescence blight and fruit rot of longan (Dimocarpus longan L.) in Puerto Rico. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, J.; Luo, T.; Xu, J.; Zhu, D.; Han, D.; Wu, Z. Comprehensive evaluation of the ‘Shixia’ longan quality under postharvest ambient storage: The volatile compounds played a critical part. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hough, G.; Garita, L. Methodology for sensory shelf-life estimation: A review. J. Sens. Studies 2012, 27, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Layeghinia, N.; Karimi, S.; Abbasi, H.; Silavi, K. Effect of osmotic dehydration on qualitative and nutritional characteristics and kinetics of microwave drying of Iranian Quince slices. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 20, 101749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Le, V.H.P.; Chokumnoyporn, N.; Sriwattana, S. Using osmotic dehydration for the production of intermediate moisture Longan. In Proceedings of the 6th International Graduate Research Conference, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 10 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed.; Association of Analytical Communities: Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 19th ed.; Association of Analytical Communities: Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bacteriological-analytical-manual-bam (accessed on 3 September 2025).
  33. Peryam, D.R.; Pilgrim, F.J. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. J. Food Sci. 1957, 11, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  34. Panwar, S.; Gehlot, R.; Siddiqui, S. Effect of osmotic agents on intermediate moisture Aonla segments during storage. Int. J. Agric. Food Technol. 2013, 4, 537–542. [Google Scholar]
  35. Centre for Food Safety. Microbiological Guidelines for Food (For Ready-to-Eat Food in General and Specific Food Items); Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department: Hong Kong, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Qiu, L.; Zhang, M.; Tang, J.; Adhikari, B.; Cao, P. Innovative technologies for producing and preserving intermediate moisture foods: A review. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saxena, S.; Mishra, B.B.; Chander, R.; Sharma, A. Shelf stable intermediate moisture pineapple (Ananas comosus) slices using hurdle technology. LWT 2009, 42, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chaturvedi, A.; Sujatha, V.; Ramesh, C.; Dilip Babu, J. Development of shelf stable intermediate moisture carrot (Daucus carota) shreds using radiation as hurdle technology. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 775–781. [Google Scholar]
  39. Homhuan, K. Color and texture improvement of dried longan by Vacuum Impregnation Technology. Master’s Thesis, Graduate Admission Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  40. Arvanitoyannis, I. Modified Atmosphere and Active Packaging Technologies; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  41. Muzaffar, K.; Kumar, P. Moisture sorption isotherms and storage study of spray dried tamarind pulp powder. Powder Technol. 2016, 291, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El Hosry, L.; Elias, V.; Chamoun, V.; Halawi, M.; Cayot, P.; Nehme, A.; Bou-Maroun, E. Maillard Reaction: Mechanism, Influencing Parameters, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Food Industrial Applications: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Somjai, C.; Siriwoharn, T.; Kulprachakarn, K.; Chaipoot, S.; Phongphisutthinant, R.; Chaiyana, W.; Wiriyacharee, P. Effect of drying process and long-term storage on characterization of Longan pulps and their biological aspects: Antioxidant and cholinesterase inhibition activities. LWT 2022, 154, 112692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Somjai, T.; Siriwoharn, K.; Kulprachakarn, S.; Chaipoot, R.; Phongphisutthinant, P. Utilization of Maillard reaction in moist-dry-heating system to enhance physicochemical and antioxidative properties of dried whole longan fruit. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nie, S.; Huang, J.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, C.; Marcone, M.; Xie, M. Effect of pH, temperature and heating time on the formation of furan in sugar–glycine model systems. Food Sci. Hum. Well 2013, 2, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wangcharoen, W.; Morasuk, W. Antioxidant capacity changes of bird chili (Capsicum frutescens Linn.) during hot air drying. ANRES 2009, 43, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
  47. Robertson, G.L. Food Packaging Principles and Practices, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 317–318. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kashiwakura, Y.; Sogabe, T.; Anantawittayanon, S.; Mochizuki, T.; Kawai, K. Water Sorption Isotherm and Critical Water Activity of Amorphous Water-Soluble Carbohydrates Characterized by the Glass Transition Temperature. J. Appl. Glycosci. 2024, 71, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hancock, B.C.; Zografi, G. The relationship between the glass transition temperature and water content in amorphous pharmaceuticals. Pharm. Res. 1994, 11, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roos, Y.H.; Drusch, S. Phase Transitions in Foods; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sablani, S.S.; Syamaladevi, R.M.; Swanson, B.G. Evaluating water activity and glass transition concepts for food stability. J. Food Eng. 2007, 83, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chaikham, P.; Kreungngern, D.; Apichartsrangkoon, A. Combined microwave and hot air convective dehydration on physical and biochemical qualities of dried longan flesh. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 2145. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tipwichai, B.; Sriwattana, S. Optimization of strawberry-longan bar formulation using response surface methodology. J. Nat. Sci. 2012, 11, 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  54. Grosso, N.R.; Resurreccion, A.V.A. Predicting consumer acceptance ratings of cracker-coated and roasted peanuts from descriptive analysis and hexanal measurements. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1530–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chandra, S.; Kumari, D. Recent development in osmotic dehydration of fruit and vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 552–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Akharume, F.; Singh, K.; Jacyznski, J.; Sivanandan, L. Microbial shelf stability assessment of osmotically dehydrated smoky apples. LWT 2017, 90, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jimeno, B.; Rosales, A.; Domingo, C.J. Shelf-life prediction for Indian mango roll using accelerated shelf-life testing (ASLT) shelf-life plot approach. Food Res. 2020, 4, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Water activities (aw) of IML packed in different packaging types: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C). See Supplementary Tables S1–S3 for mean and SD values.
Figure 1. Water activities (aw) of IML packed in different packaging types: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C). See Supplementary Tables S1–S3 for mean and SD values.
Foods 15 00040 g001
Figure 2. Moisture contents (% w.b.) of IML packed in different packaging types: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C). See Supplementary Tables S4–S6 for mean and SD values.
Figure 2. Moisture contents (% w.b.) of IML packed in different packaging types: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C). See Supplementary Tables S4–S6 for mean and SD values.
Foods 15 00040 g002
Figure 3. Color changes in IML packed in different packaging materials during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C), expressed as L* (ac), a* (df), and b* (gi) values of IML packed in three different packing materials.
Figure 3. Color changes in IML packed in different packaging materials during storage time at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C), expressed as L* (ac), a* (df), and b* (gi) values of IML packed in three different packing materials.
Foods 15 00040 g003
Figure 4. Texture analysis of IML packed in different packages: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage times at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C).
Figure 4. Texture analysis of IML packed in different packages: (A) Al bag with nitrogen, (B) Al bag without nitrogen, and (C) clear plastic bag during storage times at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C).
Foods 15 00040 g004
Figure 5. Arrhenius plot of IML stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C in Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen, and clear plastic bag.
Figure 5. Arrhenius plot of IML stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C in Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen, and clear plastic bag.
Foods 15 00040 g005
Table 1. Microbial analysis of IML samples packed in different packages at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) during 6 months of storage.
Table 1. Microbial analysis of IML samples packed in different packages at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) during 6 months of storage.
Storage
(Weeks)
Al Bag with NitrogenAl Bag without NitrogenClear Plastic Bag
4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C
Total Bacterial Count
(cfu/g)
0<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
4<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
8<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
12<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−140 ± 440 ± 6<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
16<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−155 ± 425 ± 320 ± 220 ± 430 ± 520 ± 445 ± 650 ± 10
20<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1--55 ± 260 ± 4--45 ± 330 ± 2--
2465 ± 265 ± 8--75 ± 1185± 9--50 ± 555 ± 5--
Yeast and Mold Count
(cfu/g)
0<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
4<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
8<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
12<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
16<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
20<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
24<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1<2.5 × 10−1
Table 2. Consumer acceptance scores 1 of IML samples packed in different packages at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) during 6 months of storage.
Table 2. Consumer acceptance scores 1 of IML samples packed in different packages at different temperatures (4, 25, 35, and 45 °C) during 6 months of storage.
Storage
(Weeks)
Al Bag with NitrogenAl Bag Without NitrogenClear Plastic Bag
4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C
 Overall acceptance 36.4 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.55.9 ± 1.55.7 ± 1.56.3 ± 1.45.9 ± 1.44.8 ± 1.44.1 ± 1.56.4 ± 1.35.7 ± 1.65.2 ± 1.44.5 ± 1.6
66.5 ± 1.56.3 ± 1.65.7 ± 1.65.0 ± 1.66.5 ± 1.35.7 ± 1.34.5 ± 1.73.9 ± 1.96.4 ± 1.35.7 ± 1.34.8 ± 1.64.1 ± 1.9
96.2 ± 1.65.8 ± 1.35.4 ± 1.54.3 ± 1.96.2 ± 1.55.4 ± 1.2--6.2 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.34.3 ± 1.7-
126.3 ± 1.55.8 ± 1.45.1 ± 1.64.0 ± 1.76.1 ± 1.55.6 ± 1.3--6.2 ± 1.64.9 ± 1.3--
156.3 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.44.1 ± 1.8-6.2 ± 1.45.1 ± 1.5--6.4 ± 1.54.8 ± 1.5--
186.3 ± 1.54.9 ± 1.3--5.4 ± 1.24.7 ± 1.1--5.7 ± 1.4---
216.1 ± 1.3- 2--5.3 ± 1.1---5.5 ± 1.2---
245.6 ± 1.3---4.9 ± 1.1---4.6 ± 1.3---
Color36.6 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.46.1 ± 1.65.6 ± 1.76.4 ± 1.36.0 ± 1.34.8 ± 1.63.5 ± 1.86.6 ± 1.65.9 ± 1.64.5 ± 1.53.6 ± 1.8
66.5 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.25.9 ± 1.64.9 ± 1.76.5 ± 1.45.8 ± 1.44.4 ± 1.93.3 ± 1.96.6 ± 1.55.2 ± 1.54.6 ± 1.53.3 ± 1.6
96.5 ± 1.66.1 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.54.1 ± 1.76.1 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.2--6.2 ± 1.65.5 ± 1.44.3 ± 1.7-
126.2 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.8-6.5 ± 1.65.6 ± 1.4.--6.5 ± 1.54.9 ± 1.2--
156.3 ± 1.05.6 ± 1.44.1 ± 1.9-6.3 ± 1.45.2 ± 1.6--6.6 ± 1.54.8 ± 1.5--
186.1 ± 1.14.7 ± 1.2--5.8 ± 1.24.8 ± 1.3--5.9 ± 1.3---
216.0 ± 1.0---5.7 ± 1.2---5.6 ± 1.1---
245.8 ± 1.1---5.0 ± 1.2---4.7 ± 1.3---
Flavor36.0 ± 1.66.0 ± 1.75.8 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.76.1 ± 1.56.1 ± 1.54.8 ± 1.64.5 ± 1.86.0 ± 1.55.6 ± 1.55.2 ± 1.74.6 ± 1.5
66.1 ± 1.65.8 ± 1.75.6 ± 1.65.1 ± 1.66.0 ± 1.55.8 ± 1.74.7 ± 1.74.2 ± 1.76.0 ± 1.45.5 ± 1.55.0 ± 1.74.5 ± 1.8
96.0 ± 1.85.4 ± 1.45.1 ± 1.44.4 ± 1.85.7 ± 1.45.2 ± 1.3--5.9 ± 1.35.4 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.7-
126.0 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.64.8 ± 1.64.1 ± 1.75.8 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.5--5.9 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.24.5 ± 1.6-
156.0 ± 1.65.2 ± 1.53.9 ± 1.7-6.1 ± 1.65.0 ± 1.6--6.1 ± 1.54.7 ± 1.4--
185.9 ± 1.74.9 ± 1.5--5.6 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.3--5.7 ± 1.34.6 ± 1.3--
215.8 ± 1.5---5.4 ± 1.2---5.5 ± 1.2---
245.4 ± 1.3-------4.8 ± 1.4---
1 Based on a 9-point hedonic scale. N = 50 consumers. 2—no measurement because shelf life was ended.
Table 3. Kinetic constants of L* value changes in IML products packed in different packages and stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C during storage.
Table 3. Kinetic constants of L* value changes in IML products packed in different packages and stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C during storage.
Reaction Order °CAl Bag with NitrogenAl Bag Without NitrogenClear Plastic Bag
Constant Rate (k)R2Constant Rate (k)R2Constant Rate (k)R2
 Zero order 44.5 × 10−10.8644.3 × 10−10.7824.6 × 10−10.878
253.7 × 10−10.5294.3 × 10−10.8313.4 × 10−10.482
350.1 × 1010.7647.9 × 10−10.8136.9 × 10−10.525
458.1 × 10−10.4527.2 × 10−10.4448.7 × 10−10.648
First-order41.3 × 10−20.8681.7 × 10−20.9821.5 × 10−20.939
251.7 × 10−20.7681.8 × 10−20.9461.9 × 10−20.904
354.5 × 10−20.9803.2 × 10−20.9763.3 × 10−20.835
454.9 × 10−20.9724.2 × 10−20.9553.5 × 10−20.755
Table 4. Kinetic constants of color acceptance score changes in IML products packed in different packages and stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C during storage.
Table 4. Kinetic constants of color acceptance score changes in IML products packed in different packages and stored at 4, 25, 35, and 45 °C during storage.
Reaction Order°CAl Bag with NitrogenAl Bag Without NitrogenClear Plastic Bag
Constant Rate (k)R2Constant Rate (k)R2Constant Rate (k)R2
Zero order42.7 × 10−20.7085.0 × 10−20.8105.8 × 10−20.747
257.6 × 10−20.6828.6 × 10−10.9009.7 × 10−20.868
351.5 × 10−10.9083.2 × 10−10.8991.9 × 10−10.678
452.4 × 10−10.9995.0 × 10−10.7995.0 × 10−10.824
First-order40.5 × 10−20.8080.9 × 10−20.8441.2 × 10−20.716
250.2 × 10−20.9221.6 × 10−20.9282.8 × 10−20.873
353.2 × 10−20.9508.0 × 10−20.9197.5 × 10−20.972
454.7 × 10−20.9911.1 × 10−10.8181.1 × 10−10.859
Table 5. Predicted shelf life of IML stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C in Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen, and clear plastic bag.
Table 5. Predicted shelf life of IML stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C in Al bag with nitrogen, Al bag without nitrogen, and clear plastic bag.
PackagingShelf Life, Weeks4 °C25 °C35 °C45 °C
Al bag with nitrogenActual>2415123
Predicted581474
Al bag without nitrogenActual>2415<3<3
Predicted231432
Clear plastic bagActual219<3<3
Predicted19832
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, H.P.V.; Chokumnoyporn, N.; Sangsuwan, J.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Sriwattana, S. Shelf Life Prediction of Longan with Intermediate Moisture Using Osmotic Dehydration, Combined with Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures. Foods 2026, 15, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010040

AMA Style

Le HPV, Chokumnoyporn N, Sangsuwan J, Prinyawiwatkul W, Sriwattana S. Shelf Life Prediction of Longan with Intermediate Moisture Using Osmotic Dehydration, Combined with Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures. Foods. 2026; 15(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Hong Phuc Vu, Napapan Chokumnoyporn, Jurmkwan Sangsuwan, Witoon Prinyawiwatkul, and Sujinda Sriwattana. 2026. "Shelf Life Prediction of Longan with Intermediate Moisture Using Osmotic Dehydration, Combined with Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures" Foods 15, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010040

APA Style

Le, H. P. V., Chokumnoyporn, N., Sangsuwan, J., Prinyawiwatkul, W., & Sriwattana, S. (2026). Shelf Life Prediction of Longan with Intermediate Moisture Using Osmotic Dehydration, Combined with Different Packaging and Storage Temperatures. Foods, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop