Next Article in Journal
Disaccharides and Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) Production by Wild Yeasts Isolated from Agave
Previous Article in Journal
Soy Sauce Fermentation with Cordyceps militaris: Process Optimization and Functional Profiling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultrasound-Enhanced Ionotropic Gelation of Pectin for Lemon Essential Oil Encapsulation: Morphological Characterization and Application in Fresh-Cut Apple Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Trends in Active Packaging for Food: A Six-Year Review

by
Mariana A. Andrade
1,2,
Cássia H. Barbosa
1,3,
Regiane Ribeiro-Santos
4,
Sidney Tomé
1,
Ana Luísa Fernando
3,
Ana Sanches Silva
5,6,7 and
Fernanda Vilarinho
1,*
1
Department of Food and Nutrition, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
2
REQUIMTE/LAQV, R. D. Manuel II, Apartado, 55142 Oporto, Portugal
3
Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center (METRICS), Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
4
Federal Institute of Rondônia, Ariquemes CEP 76.878-899, RO, Brazil
5
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
6
Centro de Estudos de Ciências Animal (CECA), ICETA, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Oporto, Portugal
7
Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(15), 2713; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152713
Submission received: 17 June 2025 / Revised: 25 July 2025 / Accepted: 29 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025

Abstract

The development of active food packaging has evolved rapidly in recent years, offering innovative solutions to enhance food preservation and safety while addressing sustainability challenges. This review compiles and analyzes recent advancements (2019–2024) in release-type active packaging, focusing on essential oils, natural extracts, and phenolic compounds as active agents. Primarily plant-derived, these compounds exhibit significant antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, extending shelf life and enhancing food quality. Technological strategies such as encapsulation and polymer blending have been increasingly adopted to overcome challenges related to volatility, solubility, and sensory impact. Integrating bio-based polymers, including chitosan, starch, and polylactic acid, further supports the development of environmentally friendly packaging systems. This review also highlights trends in compound-specific research, release mechanisms, and commercial applications, including a detailed analysis of patents and case studies across various food matrices. These developments have already been translated into practical applications, such as antimicrobial sachets for meat and essential oil-based pads for fresh produce. Moreover, by promoting the valorization of agro-industrial by-products and the use of biodegradable materials, emission-type active packaging contributes to the principles of the circular economy. This comprehensive overview underscores the potential of natural bioactive compounds in advancing sustainable and functional food packaging technologies.

1. Introduction

As consumers, we have at our disposal a vast array of packaging. Packaging systems are diverse and multifunctional, from simple paper packaging to complex multi-layer packaging made of various types of plastic with multiple functions, including the basic single-layer transparent plastic packaging. Regarding food packaging, the options are also wide, and the primary function is to protect food during transport, distribution, and storage until it reaches the end consumer.
Throughout the years, several food packaging concepts have emerged, including active food packaging. This concept is based on the interaction between the packaging and the packaged food, with the goal to extend the food’s shelf-life or to maintain or improve the condition of the packaged food [1]. Active-releasing systems are designed to deliberately release substances, such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, carbon dioxide, flavors, ethylene, and ethanol, from the packaging into the food or the environment surrounding the food [2]. This can be an advantage, since the additive is incorporated into the packaging matrix rather than directly into the food, potentially reducing the amount of additives consumed by the final consumer [2]. For the purposes of this review, only this type of system will be considered.
The Regulation EC 1333/2008 [3] and its amendments set the definitions and conditions of use of food additives. For the direct and indirect use of additives in foods, the substance in question must be authorized and listed in this Regulation. Several studies have demonstrated that long-term exposure to synthetic food additives can have harmful effects on human health, leading to the development of diabetes, liver and kidney damage, infertility, allergic reactions, and various types of cancer [4]. As a result, the industry’s interest has shifted to look for natural-based additives with similar activities/functions to the synthetic ones. Among these natural-based additives, essential oils and phenolic compounds have gained particular attention due to their well-documented antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [5,6,7]. However, these natural-based additives, although very promising, still present some technological drawbacks, such as high volatilization, low solubility, chemical instability, and hydrophobicity [4]. One way to address these difficulties is through active food packaging techniques, since the additive is indirectly applied to the food.
In the category of natural compounds, phenolic compounds form a highly diverse group that has gained increasing attention over the years. These secondary metabolites produced by plants are the second most abundant group in the plant kingdom and are responsible for several characteristics, namely defense against ultraviolet radiation, biotic and abiotic stress, pathogens, and herbivores, and they are also responsible for quality attributes of vegetables and fruits such as flavor and color [8]. Generally, these compounds are obtained in the form of extracts or essential oils, which can be extracted by several methods, such as solvent extraction and microwave-assisted extraction, among others.
Essential oils (EOs) have been used by human civilization since ancient times for multiple purposes, such as religious rituals, fragrances, and medicinal purposes [9]. EOs are highly volatile substances that can be isolated through steam or dry distillation or by mechanical processes. Exhibiting low solubility in water, these substances dissolve well in most organic solvents and blend easily with vegetable oils, fats, and waxes [10]. Regarding its general chemical composition, the majority of EOs are composed mainly of hydrocarbons (mono- and sesquiterpenes), such as limonene and pinene, or oxygenated compounds, such as eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, and linalool. However, in some cases, such as thyme and peppermint, the predominant derivatives are aromatic, such as thymol and carvacrol [10].
Unlike EOs, plant extracts can have non-volatile compounds, such as tannins, flavonoids, vitamins, and minerals. These non-volatile compounds, with high molecular weight, can be extracted by solvents (solid–liquid extraction), maceration, or supercritical fluids [11,12,13]. These EOs and natural extracts have powerful biological activities due to their complex chemical composition. While hydrocarbons do not have direct biological activity, they can potentiate the effects of oxygenated and phenolic compounds, which are mainly responsible for EOs and extracts’ biological activities.
With more than 8000 identified phenolic structures, phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites produced by plants for their natural defense against UV and IR radiation, pathogens, and predators. Characterized by having at least one aromatic ring with one or more OH groups, they can be divided into simple (one aromatic ring) and polyphenol (more than one aromatic ring) classes [14,15]. The polyphenols class can be divided into flavonoids and non-flavonoids, which comprise tannins, lignans, stilbenes, and phenolic acids [15,16].
Research on active food packaging has increased significantly over the last 20 years, with exponential growth in the past 5 years (Table 1). A simple search in the PubMed database from 2004 to 2024 (publication year), using only the keywords ‘active food packaging,’ returned 6320 results. Of these, 4428 were published between 2019 and 2024, with 2020 results from 2023 and 2024. According to the PubMed search, the journal with the most publications is the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (1045 papers), followed by Food Chemistry (379 papers) and Polymers (347 papers).
Using the Web of Science database with the same keywords, the search yielded 5740 results from 2004 to 2024 (publication year) (Table 1). Of these, 4191 were published between 2019 and 2024, and 1968 were from 2023 and 2024. According to the Web of Science search, between 2004 and 2024, the journal with the most publications was the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (500 papers), followed by Food Packaging and Shelf Life (315 papers) and Food Hydrocolloids (245 papers). In addition, according to the Web of Science search, from the 4191 papers, 800 are Reviews and 3312 are Research papers.
Adding the keyword “release” to “active food packaging”, between 2019 and 2024, the Web of Science database returned 1034 results, and the PubMed database returned 649.
The main goal of this review is to compile, between 2019 and 2024, the latest trends in release-type active food packaging, particularly those using EOs, natural extracts, or individual phenolic compounds, to prolong foods’ shelf life. Although this review does not follow a systematic review protocol, a structured and transparent literature search strategy was employed, adhering to PRISMA principles. After an initial search in PubMed and Web of Science using the keywords “active food packaging” and “release,” titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies specifically focused on emission-type active packaging involving essential oils, natural extracts, or individual phenolic compounds. Non-relevant records (e.g., studies on direct food application, gaseous emitters, or innovative packaging without release function) were excluded. Approximately 100+ peer-reviewed articles were selected for detailed analysis.

2. Biopolymers

The widespread dependence on conventional petroleum-based plastics has led to significant environmental concerns due to their non-biodegradable nature. As a sustainable alternative, bio-based biodegradable polymers have gained increasing attention. This shift has fueled research into functionalized natural polymers for food packaging, driven by both environmental concerns and the demand for eco-friendly materials. Several natural and semi-synthetic polymers have been investigated for their potential in active packaging systems, including starch [17], pectin [18], polyvinyl alcohol [19], sodium alginate [20], gelatin [21], chitosan [22], polylactic acid [23], carrageenan [24], protein [25], and carboxymethyl cellulose [26].
Among these, PLA stands out as a particularly promising candidate. Synthesized via microbial fermentation of sugars from renewable resources such as sugarcane or corn starch, PLA combines mechanical strength, renewability, transparency, non-toxicity, and processing [27]. Nonetheless, its inherent brittleness and low-impact resistance limit its application in flexible packaging formats [28]. These drawbacks may be mitigated through the incorporation of nanocomposites, essential oils (EOs), natural extracts, or blending with other polymers. However, the incorporation of EOs into PLA can be technically challenging due to potential phase separation, as well as thermal degradation of volatile EO compounds during high-temperature processing such as extrusion or hot pressing.
Chitosan (CS), obtained by the deacetylation of chitin, which is produced by arthropods and fungi, is non-toxic, biofunctional, and biocompatible, and it presents antimicrobial properties [29,30]. Compared to conventional plastics, chitosan offers notable advantages, including biodegradability and derivation from renewable sources. However, it presents some disadvantages, such as inferior mechanical and barrier properties and low solubility in neutral and alkaline conditions, requiring acidic solutions for processing; thus, it is unsuitable for high-temperature applications and has a higher production cost [30]. The acidic medium required for chitosan solubilization may also compromise the stability or dispersibility of certain hydrophobic EOs, affecting film homogeneity and release behavior. The incorporation of EOs, phenolic compounds, and nanoparticles can improve the mechanical performance, reduce the water permeability, and enhance the antimicrobial properties of chitosan-based films [30].
Starch is the most abundant renewable polysaccharide and is widely used due to its film-forming ability, biodegradability, and low cost. Starch-based polymers, such as amylose, which exhibits film-forming capabilities, and amylopectin, which influences crystallinity and mechanical properties, can be processed into films or coatings via casting or extrusion techniques. However, like most natural biodegradable polymers, starch-based materials exhibit several limitations, including low tensile strength, high brittleness, poor barrier properties, and thermal instability at elevated temperatures. Despite their environmental advantages, when compared with conventional plastics, starch-based polymers demonstrate inferior performance characteristics, making them more suitable for short-term packaging applications. Nevertheless, the incorporation of EOs and nanocomposites has been shown to significantly enhance their functional properties and mitigate these drawbacks [31]. From a processing standpoint, the hydrophilic nature of starch and chitosan often leads to poor miscibility with hydrophobic essential oils, which may require emulsifiers or encapsulation strategies to ensure even distribution within the matrix.
When compared directly, PLA offers better mechanical strength and thermal processability, making it suitable for rigid and semi-rigid packaging formats. Chitosan stands out for its intrinsic antimicrobial activity but is limited by its solubility and thermal constraints. Starch is the most affordable and biodegradable but requires significant functional enhancement to match conventional plastic performance. Therefore, polymer selection should be guided by the specific packaging application, shelf-life needs, and processing methods [32].
EOs offers a natural approach to controlling microbial growth and preserving food quality. Incorporating EOs into films and coatings offers a practical advantage over direct application. This method allows for controlled release of bioactive compounds, prolonging their contact with the food and mitigating the potential negative impact on sensory attributes that can occur with direct application of higher, effective doses that may surpass acceptable limits.
Despite the promise of bio-based materials, many remain limited to laboratory-scale applications due to challenges in thermal processability and mechanical stability [33]. Consequently, natural polymer composite films functionalized with EOs have become a major focus of research in active packaging. A wide range of EOs have been explored for this purpose, including cinnamon, clove, tea tree, basil, eucalyptus, thyme, rosemary, sage, Artemisia absinthium, pimento, coriander, lime, fennel, oregano, lavender, turmeric, and orange, among others [17,26,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Effective active packaging requires a gradual and sustained EO release to maintain antimicrobial and antioxidant activity throughout the product’s shelf life. Nanoparticles have shown promise in controlling EO release by acting as a physical barrier to additive release [36,42]. Surendhiran et al. [36] reported that the tortuous release pathway of EOs within a nanomatrix into bio-nanocomposite film (encapsulated essential oil) results in slow release, thereby extending food shelf life. In contrast, simply blending EOs into packaging films leads to a rapid and uncontrolled release of the EO over a short period, reducing the preservation time.
The growing interest in biopolymer-based systems functionalized with natural compounds has led to a proliferation of studies testing these materials in real food matrices, which are discussed in Section 4.

3. Active Compounds

3.1. Essential Oils

3.1.1. Sources and Composition

EOs are volatile, aromatic, oily liquids extracted from various plant parts [43]. A single plant species may produce multiple types of EOs, located in different parts such as the leaves, flowers, buds, shoots, peels, bark, seeds, rind, and roots [20,34,44,45,46].
EOs are rich in bioactive compounds, exhibiting both antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. They represent a generally recognized safe and biodegradable alternative to synthetic additives, as supported by their GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status, and demonstrated efficacy in several systematic reviews and meta-analyses [5,32,43,47]. These natural products possess a complex composition, with terpenes being the most common class of chemical compounds present [44].

3.1.2. Extraction Methods

The conventional methods for producing essential oils include distillation (hydrodistillation and steam distillation) and solvent extraction. Cold pressing is typically used for citrus essential oils [48]. More advanced techniques, such as supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation (sonohydrodistillation) have also been utilized [34,49,50].
A summary of the most widely applied extraction methods for obtaining essential oils is presented in Figure 1.

3.1.3. Bioactivity and Mechanisms of Action

EOs exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including antimicrobial, antioxidative, and anti-deterioration effects, contributing to extended food product shelf life [19,20,21,23,44]. These oils achieve this by controlling microbial growth and preserving food integrity. While the principal components of EOs are generally considered the primary contributors to their bioactivity, minor constituents may also exert significant influence through synergistic or additive interactions [51]. The potential synergistic effects of the combination of plant essential oil (EO) offer a promising strategy to enhance their action.
Studies have shown correlations between EO composition and bioactivity. Chen et al. [6] found a strong positive correlation between antioxidant activity and eugenol and thymol content in cinnamon, thyme, and clove oils. In contrast, lavender and peppermint oils, rich in linalool and menthol, showed low antioxidant activity. Similarly, Manssouri et al. [52] observed a positive correlation between antioxidant activity and phenolic compound content in Ammodaucus leucotrichus Coss. & Dur. fruit EO. Lee et al. [53] attributed the high antioxidant activity of Citrus unshiu (linalool-rich), and Cinnamomum loureirii Nees (eucalyptol, α-citral, β-citral, and linalool-rich) oils to their compositions. This compositional difference also correlated with antimicrobial activity; C. unshiu oil showed no such activity, whereas C. loureirii oil exhibited strong antifungal activity against Candida albicans.
Several studies have investigated the antimicrobial activity of EOs against various foodborne pathogens. Yasir et al. [54] investigated the antibacterial activity of several essential oils against pathogens isolated from raw milk. Thyme oil (Thymus vulgaris) exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity overall, particularly against Escherichia spp. Oregano oil also showed strong activity against Escherichia spp., suggesting a possible synergistic effect when used in combination with thyme oil. Lemongrass oil was highly effective against Staphylococcus spp. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and Spearmint mint (Mentha spicata) oils showed the lowest antibacterial activity. The antimicrobial action of species was attributed to the presence of different active compounds, mainly phenolic compounds.
Mangalagiria et al. [55] reported Lemongrass and palmarosa oils demonstrated stronger antibacterial activity than other oils (eucalyptus, geranium, citronella, and tagetes), with citral (a major component of lemongrass oil) exhibiting potent bactericidal activity. They also found these oils to be effective against four fungi tested, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium udum, and Magnaporthe grisea. Abers et al. [45] screened 19 volatile compounds from various EOs and found rosemary, tea tree, and cassia oils to be the most potent broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. In contrast, clove volatiles exhibited virtually no antimicrobial activity.
The antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of essential oils are primarily attributed to specific classes of compounds, including phenolics, terpenes, and aldehydes, each acting through distinct yet sometimes overlapping mechanisms. Phenolic compounds such as thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol integrate into bacterial membranes, disrupting their lipid bilayers and leading to increased permeability, ion leakage, and eventual cell lysis. These compounds can also scavenge free radicals and chelate metal ions, thus preventing oxidative damage. Terpenes (e.g., limonene, pinene) mainly increase membrane fluidity and may interfere with intracellular enzymes. Aldehydes like cinnamaldehyde alter membrane protein conformation and inhibit enzyme activity by reacting with thiol groups. Figure 2 summarizes these major mechanistic pathways.
The antimicrobial activity of EOs involves multiple mechanisms, including disruption of microbial cell membranes, leakage of intracellular contents, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibition of key metabolic enzymes. Phenolic compounds such as carvacrol and thymol integrate into lipid bilayers, increasing membrane permeability, while eugenol can interfere with ATP production. These mechanisms contribute to broad-spectrum bioactivity against spoilage and pathogenic organisms.
Microbial inactivation by EOs is a complex process influenced by several factors such as the microorganism, EO properties (type and concentration), the food matrix, and the treatment intensity [56]. Furthermore, the chemical composition and content of EO are subject to variation due to both intrinsic (genetic characteristics and phenological stage) and extrinsic factors (environmental conditions, geographical location, seasonality, soil and the method of extraction) [50,57,58,59,60,61,62].
Although phenolics are major compounds of EOs, there are others with equally powerful biological activity, such as terpenes and terpenoids, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, esters, and ethers [63,64].

3.1.4. Applications for Active Packaging

Innovations in Encapsulation and Controlled Release
Incorporating EOs into food packaging materials is a significant strategy for extending the shelf life of perishable foods while addressing consumer concerns about the potential health risks associated with synthetic additives [19,20,21,23].
In the development of a new generation of food packaging, the focus is on environmentally friendly materials from renewable sources. Flexible bio-based films, primarily composed of biopolymers like polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids, provide a sustainable matrix for natural active agents. Essential oils offer a natural solution for microbial control and food preservation in bio-based films.
Nanoencapsulation, emulsification, and cyclodextrin inclusion are widely explored for enhancing EO stability, reducing volatility, and enabling controlled release.
Synergistic Combinations and Functional Blends
EOs can also contribute to desirable sensory qualities, such as color and flavor, enhancing freshness [65]. For example, Zanthoxylum bungeanum EO improved color properties and inhibited lipid oxidation in Chinese-style sausage [66]. Lima et al. [25] developed an aromatic and antioxidant active film based on myofibrillar protein from fish by-products and passion fruit EO, where the EO provided antioxidant activity and a desirable aroma while reducing fish odor. A review by Zhang et al. [65] highlighted the positive influence of EOs on food sensory characteristics.
Several studies also explore synergistic blends, such as thyme–oregano or clove–cinnamon oil combinations, which enhance antimicrobial efficacy while reducing the amount of EO needed.
Polymer–EO Interactions and Performance
Flexible biopolymer matrices can influence the activity and stability of incorporated EOs, but the interaction between EOs and polymers also affects film structure and function.
EO incorporation may alter polymer properties, such as increasing film brittleness or lowering tensile strength. Formulation strategies (e.g., blending, use of plasticizers) are often needed to balance functionality and mechanical integrity.
In summary, recent studies between 2019 and 2024 highlight key innovations in emission-type active packaging with essential oils. Encapsulation techniques, synergistic blends, and polymer–EO optimization are among the most studied strategies. While the effectiveness of EOs against spoilage organisms and oxidation is well documented, performance trade-offs—such as mechanical weakening or aroma intensity—are common. Furthermore, many studies are limited to in vitro systems, with few addressing food matrix effects, sensory impact, or long-term migration, pointing to the need for more application-oriented research.

3.1.5. Limitations and Technological Solutions

Nevertheless, the use of EOs in food preservation is sometimes limited by their intense aroma. The concentrations required for effective antimicrobial or antioxidant activity can negatively impact the food’s organoleptic properties [67].
However, free EOs are limited by low water solubility, oxidation, and volatilization. Nanoencapsulation has proven to be a valuable strategy for enhancing the stability and bioactivity of EOs compared to their free form [68]. Incorporating EOs into bio-based films via Pickering emulsions also offers effective solutions, enhancing antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and leading to extended food shelf life [69].
Beyond volatility and aroma issues, critical challenges include ensuring compatibility between EOs and food matrices, controlling migration rates within legal limits, and addressing regulatory barriers—particularly for compounds not classified as GRAS or exceeding specific migration limits (SMLs). Moreover, consumer perception remains a key barrier, as strong EO aromas may affect sensory acceptance unless properly masked or stabilized.

3.1.6. Patent Developments

Numerous patents cover the use of essential oils in food packaging, reflecting the positive results achieved with this approach (Table 2).
One patent describes a protein-based edible film designed for efficient essential oil release (U.S. Patent 20210186064). Another invention details a process for creating essential oil-modified nanocellulose, where the essential oil is covalently bonded to the nanocellulose to prevent leaching, resulting in edible coatings with prolonged antimicrobial effects (U.S. Patent 20210054104). A Chinese patent (CH116478546A) describes a controlled-release antibacterial active packaging film. This film uses composite nanoparticles (zein and carboxylated cellulose nanowhiskers) to coat essential oil droplets, forming a stable dispersion. This emulsion is then incorporated into the film, allowing for controlled release of the essential oil. Another Chinese patent (CN 114249926B) discloses edible packaging films based on corn starch and chitosan incorporated with essential oil microcapsules.
While these technological advancements and patent developments reflect significant progress in the field, broader implementation still faces several non-technical challenges related to regulation, economics, and consumer acceptance, as discussed below.

3.1.7. Regulatory, Economic, and Consumer Acceptance Challenges

Several barriers hinder the transition from laboratory research to commercial application of EO-based active packaging. Regulatory approvals, such as GRAS status in the United States and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) evaluations in the European Union, are essential for ensuring food contact compliance. These assessments require detailed toxicological, chemical, and migration data, which are often lacking or difficult to obtain for complex mixtures, such as EOs [70,71]. Furthermore, the regulatory landscape is not harmonized globally, creating additional complexity for multinational commercialization [71].
Economic constraints, particularly the cost of high-purity EOs and encapsulation technologies, can limit scalability. While encapsulation enhances the stability and controlled release of volatile compounds, it adds to production costs and may require specialized equipment [70]. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) may find it challenging to invest in such technologies without clear market incentives or regulatory facilitation [71].
Consumer acceptance is another critical factor. Sensory attributes such as odor intensity and product appearance influence purchase decisions. Some consumers may perceive EO-based packaging as unnatural or intrusive, especially if the labeling is unclear or implies the presence of functional additives in the food. Transparent communication and education about the benefits and safety of such packaging systems are essential for building trust. Moreover, studies show that while consumers often express interest in sustainable and natural packaging, actual willingness to pay more remains limited [72].
Addressing these challenges requires a multi-stakeholder approach, involving collaboration among industry, regulatory bodies, and consumer advocacy groups. Innovations in cost-effective encapsulation methods, harmonization of safety assessments, and strategies for consumer engagement will be crucial for the successful implementation of emission-type active packaging solutions in the food sector [71,72].

3.2. Natural Extracts

3.2.1. Sources and Composition

Besides EOs, natural extracts can be obtained from plants, animals, herbs, spices, or microflora, as well as agro-industrial by-products [73,74].
These natural extracts are rich in different compounds, such as flavonoids, phenols, organic acids, indicans, vitamins, terpenoids, protein, amino acids, sugar, glycoproteins, resins, lignins, fats, alkaloids, and colloids [75,76].

3.2.2. Extraction Methods

Another factor that can affect the composition of the natural extract is the extraction process. There are different extraction techniques with different impacts on the end-product and the environment. The traditional extraction techniques include Soxhlet extraction, solvent extraction, and steam distillation, which are environmentally harmful, expensive, and time-consuming [77]. The greener extraction techniques include microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (Figure 3).
Compared to traditional extraction techniques such as maceration or hydrodistillation, green methods like microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) offer clear environmental advantages. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have demonstrated that both MAE and UAE significantly reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and water use per unit of bioactive compound extracted, with MAE ranking among the most eco-efficient methods [78]. Additional comparative analyses show that these techniques can lower processing time and solvent usage by up to 40–60% while maintaining or even improving extraction yields compared to conventional methods [79]. Such evidence helps to contextualize and validate the sustainability claims often associated with green extraction, underscoring the relevance of MAE and UAE as truly eco-friendly solutions for recovering bioactives in active packaging applications.
These techniques are fast, environmentally friendly, and do not use harmful solvents, producing extracts with higher quality and yield [77]. The use of natural extracts in the development of food packaging comes from a circular economic perspective, since natural extracts can be derived from food waste, often rich in bioactive compounds, leading to zero waste.

3.2.3. Bioactivity and Mechanisms of Action

Natural extracts can have different properties, like antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, and anti-browning activity, in addition to other biological effects such as anti-hypertensive, anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, anti-cancer, and anti-diabetic effects [74,77,80]. Nonetheless, these properties are dependent on the composition of the natural extracts, which can vary on several factors, including variety, geographical origin, development stage, climate conditions, the season of growth, ripening stage, and harvest [81].

3.2.4. Applications for Active Packaging

Over the past five years, numerous studies have explored new active food packaging systems incorporating natural extracts (Section 4). Several bio-degradable polymers have been studied for this purpose, including chitosan, alginate, poly (lactic acid) (PLA), carrageenan, cellulose, whey protein, soy protein, and carboxymethyl cellulose, among others. The combination of these polymers with active natural extracts offers multiple benefits. For instance, using natural extracts can reduce the need for synthetic additives directly added to foods, contributing to a healthier diet. Furthermore, adding these natural extracts as active components to the food packaging has been demonstrated to improve the packaging properties.
For instance, Mellinas et al. [82] developed and characterized a pectin-based active film with zinc oxide nanoparticles and cocoa bean shell extract obtained from food by-products. The addition of the natural extract and zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the overall oxygen, thermal, and UV barrier properties of the films, where the oxygen barrier was improved by 50% and the screen to UV radiation reached 98% [68]. In another study by Rambabu et al. [83], chitosan films incorporated with mango leaf extract were developed and analyzed. In this study, the addition of mango leaf extract increased the film’s thickness, density, and surface hydrophobicity. It also improved the film’s antioxidant activity and tensile strength, but it decreased the film’s water vapor permeability, water solubility, and elongation at break [83]. Todhanakasem et al. [84] studied the film composed of polyvinyl alcohol, corn starch, glycerol, and watermelon rind extract as the active compound. The active film presented higher tensile strength and elongation at break and improved water vapor permeability compared to the control film (without extract). The active film also demonstrated excellent antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial properties [84].
In addition to evaluating the effect of natural extracts on the food packaging developed, studies have been developed to determine the impact of this active packaging on food. For example, Andrade et al. [85] evaluated the effectiveness of a whey protein film incorporated with rosemary extract against the lipid oxidation of salami during 90 days at 5 °C. The authors concluded that the active film was able to delay lipid oxidation of salami, as the samples presented lower values of malonaldehyde (MDA) and hexanal in comparison with the control. All samples presented levels of MDA below 0.5 mg MDA/kg, the value at which consumers do not detect the off flavor [85]. In another study, the effectiveness of a chitosan–starch coating with garlic extract incorporated on green and yellow bell peppers (Capsicum annuum) over 18 days was evaluated [86]. The coating effectively prevented weight loss and bacterial growth during the storage period, demonstrating its potential in maintaining both green and yellow bell pepper properties [86]. A chitosan-peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) leaf extract composite film was developed by Ma et al. [87] and applied to apples to evaluate its potential in extending fruit shelf life. In addition to the positive effects of the extract on the physical and barrier properties of the film (Section 4), the active film was able to protect the fruit from natural browning, compared to the control, as the film protected the fruit from oxidation and external factors [87]. Fan et al. [88] successfully developed an active film packaging based on chitosan and starch and with Portulaca oleracea extract incorporated. The Portulaca oleracea chitosan–starch film successfully protected the meat colors and overall appearance during storage. The active film was able to delay the meat from lipid oxidation and spoilage compared to the meat packed with the control film and polyethylene film [88].
In summary, polysaccharide-based films—particularly those based on chitosan and starch—demonstrated high compatibility with phenolic-rich plant extracts, showing consistent antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, especially against fungal spoilage and lipid oxidation. Extracts from grape seed, pomegranate peel, and oregano emerged as the most effective, often reducing microbial counts by 2–3 log CFU/g or delaying oxidation in high-fat foods. However, trade-offs were frequently observed; films with high bioactivity often showed reduced mechanical strength or increased brittleness, especially in systems lacking adequate plasticizers or encapsulation strategies. Additionally, several studies relied on in vitro tests, with limited validation in real food systems or sensory analyses, underscoring the need for more holistic assessments in future research.
Further applications, including meat, dairy, and fresh produce preservation using grape seed extract-, oregano oil-, and chitosan-based films, are detailed in Section 4.

3.3. Phenolic Compounds

The biological activity of natural extracts and EOs is largely attributed to their phenolic content. Phenolic compounds constitute a broad class of secondary metabolites, encompassing multiple sub-classes with distinct structural and functional properties. Despite this diversity, only a limited number of phenolics have been extensively studied for applications in active food packaging (Table 3).

3.3.1. Bioactivity and Mechanisms of Action

The antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is primarily exerted through their interaction with free radicals via several mechanisms: (1) hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)—the donation of hydrogen atoms from phenolic hydroxyl (-OH) groups to neutralize free radicals; (2) single-electron transfer (SET)—reduction in radical species (e.g., Fe3+, Cu2+) via electron donation; (3) sequential proton loss electron transfer (SPLET)—deprotonation of the -OH group followed by electron transfer, forming resonance-stabilized phenoxyl radicals, or (4) transition metal chelation—complexation of redox-active (Fe2+, Cu+) [89].
In terms of antimicrobial activity, phenolic compounds have several antimicrobial mechanisms, all centered on damaging the membrane cell wall, allowing for the entrance of the compound in the cell, disturbing intracellular functions, and inducing apoptosis [7]. Their mode of action can vary significantly depending on their structure, which has prompted research into synergistic combinations of phenolics to enhance bioactivity.
Cinnamaldehyde is one of the main compounds of cinnamon, specially found in the varieties Cinnamomum verum and Cinnamomum cassia. Responsible for the sweet taste of cinnamon, this hydrophobic aromatic aldehyde is obtained from the bark (main compound), leaves, and roots of trees of the genus Cinnamomum [90]. It exhibits significant anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-angiogenic activities, modulating cellular processes such as apoptosis, oxidative stress, and immune responses. Its main applications include potential use in cancer therapy, food flavoring, and as a therapeutic agent for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [91,92,93].

3.3.2. Applications for Active Packaging

In the context of food packaging, Aragón-Gutiérrez et al. [94], incorporated cinnamaldehyde into ethylene vinyl alcohol-based films via solvent casting and melt extrusion at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15%. The resulting active films demonstrated antioxidant activity by the DPPH radical scavenging assay and antimicrobial activity against Penicillium expansum [94]. Similarly, Yu et al. [95] incorporated cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenol into zein-based films by solvent casting at 1, 3, and 5%. The film with 5% of carvacrol showed antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli [95]. Further applications of cinnamaldehyde and related phenolic compounds in active packaging are summarized in Section 4.

3.3.3. Limitations and Technological Solutions

Despite their functional potential, phenolic compounds face challenges in packaging applications. Sensory impact is important in the acceptance of the final products by the consumer, and several phenolic compounds have strong aromas or colors that could impact the final product. Additionally, their high volatility limits their effectiveness in active food packaging as rapid, rather than controlled, migration fails to extend shelf life adequately.
To overcome these limitations, encapsulation techniques using cyclodextrins or liposomes offers a solution by reducing migration rates. Additionally, polymer selection plays a key role; using neutral-flavor matrices like polylactic acid or chitosan can mitigate sensory interference. Finally, optimizing concentrations ensures maximal functional benefits while maintaining sensory acceptability.

4. Examples of Application of New Active Food-Packaging Materials

Active food packaging incorporating EOs, natural extracts, or phenolic compounds can be tested on perishable foods like cheese, fruits, fish, and meat. These systems have consistently demonstrated the ability to inhibit microbial growth and lipid oxidation, contributing to shelf-life extension and improved food quality [17,39,96,97].
In one study, pork patties were packaged using CS films incorporating clove oil (CO) and/or nisin (NI). The CS-CO-NI film best preserves its appearance and slows down redness changes, likely due to the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of CS, CO, and NI. CO proved most effective in inhibiting metmyoglobin formation and lipid oxidation, as indicated by free fatty acid, peroxide value, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Microbiologically, pork patties packed with CS-CO-NI showed the strongest inhibition of pseudomonas, enterobacteriaceae, and lactic acid bacteria, suggesting synergistic antimicrobial effects of the combination of CS, CO, and NI [98].
Similarly, CS films incorporating turmeric essential oil (TEO) were evaluated for surimi preservation [36]. While a CS/TEO film initially inhibited Bacillus cereus growth, its effect diminished after 6 days due to the uncontrolled, speedy release of TEO. A CS/ magnetic nanoparticles/silica/TEO bio-nanocomposite film (chitosan-based food packaging incorporating encapsulated TEO into magnetic nanoparticles/silica nanocomposites), provided sustained inhibition, maintaining low bacterial counts throughout the 14-day storage period due to controlled TEO release. Both films helped maintain a near-neutral pH, suggesting that TEO has antioxidant properties. Minimal silica migration (0.70%) was observed from the bio-nanocomposite film into the surimi, with no detectable MNPs [36].
In the case of fruits, strawberries coated with a yam starch base incorporating lime, fennel, and lavender essential oils were stored at 25 °C and 85% relative humidity for two weeks. These coated strawberries exhibited less weight loss and reduced Aspergillus niger growth until day 8 of storage. Among the tested oils, lavender EO demonstrated the highest antioxidant activity [17].
Cheese products have also benefited from active coating. Double cream cheese coated with a film composed of achira starch and microcrystalline cellulose, containing either garlic oil (EXg) or oregano oil (EXo), was compared to uncoated cheese (C1) and cheese coated without any natural oils (C2). EXo samples exhibited the lowest weight loss and the least hardness throughout the storage period. Both EXg and EXo coatings minimized color changes and effectively maintained the product’s microbiological quality; furthermore, they improved the sensory acceptance of the cheese. The oregano oil coating proved most effective overall [99].
Taken together, the results from Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 suggest that the combination of chitosan with clove oil or turmeric EO, and PLA with oregano or cinnamon oil, were among the most effective in extending shelf life, reducing microbial loads, and maintaining sensory attributes. For instance, the use of CS–clove oil–NI films extended the shelf life of pork by up to 12 days [98], while CS-based bionanocomposites incorporating encapsulated turmeric EO sustained microbial inhibition for 14 days in surimi [36]. PLA films with thymol- or oregano-encapsulated systems preserved the freshness of fruit and meat for up to 30 days [100,101]. In terms of natural extracts, rosemary, green tea, and garlic extracts demonstrated strong antioxidant and antimicrobial capacities, prolonging the stability of products in meat and bakery items for up to 30 days [85,86,102,103,104]. Films that allowed for gradual and controlled release—such as those incorporating encapsulated EOs or nanoemulsions—consistently outperformed direct incorporation methods. Sensory evaluations, when performed, generally indicated improved consumer acceptance with EO-based films compared to controls.
These findings underscore the importance of selecting suitable combinations of biopolymer matrix and active agents, as well as the use of encapsulation strategies to ensure sustained protection throughout the product’s shelf life. Altogether, the results highlight the potential of biopolymer-based films functionalized with natural compounds in extending shelf life and maintaining the quality of various perishable food products. Additional examples of active packaging applications using essential oils, natural extracts, and individual compounds are summarized in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6, respectively, and support the trends discussed above.

5. Conclusions

Active food packaging technologies, particularly those incorporating emission-active compounds such as essential oils (EOs), natural extracts, and individual phenolic compounds, have emerged as innovative tools in food preservation over the last five years. These compounds exhibit strong antimicrobial and antioxidant functionalities that can be effectively deployed via controlled-release packaging systems. When embedded in biodegradable and bio-based polymers like chitosan (CS), polylactic acid (PLA), or starch, they not only enhance food safety and shelf-life but also reduce dependency on synthetic additives and non-degradable plastics.
This review demonstrates that innovations in encapsulation methods, such as nano-encapsulation, emulsions, and cyclodextrin complexes, are critical in mitigating limitations like volatility, rapid degradation, and sensory interference. These methods enable a gradual release of active compounds, essential for maintaining the functional efficacy of the packaging throughout storage and distribution.
Furthermore, the field has seen significant strides in using agricultural and food processing by-products to obtain natural extracts. This approach not only reduces waste but also extends the value chain of food production systems by converting residues into functional packaging components. This aligns with circular economy principles, which emphasize resource efficiency, waste minimization, and material circularity, and contributes to the valorization of food waste, a critical goal in global sustainability efforts. The integration of these bioactives into biodegradable films contributes to more sustainable packaging solutions by reducing reliance on virgin raw materials and fossil-based plastics. Several studies have successfully integrated these bioactive materials into films that simultaneously improve the mechanical, barrier, and optical properties of packaging while offering potent biological effects against spoilage organisms and oxidative processes.
The commercial potential of these materials is underscored by the growing number of patents and pilot-scale developments observed during the review period. However, a clear gap remains between laboratory innovation and industrial implementation. Scaling up these technologies requires addressing regulatory approval, consumer acceptance, cost-effectiveness, and consistent raw material sourcing.
Additionally, long-term toxicological studies and comprehensive environmental impact assessments of both the active compounds and the packaging materials themselves are essential for broader market acceptance. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to keep pace with these innovations, providing clear guidance for using natural and biodegradable materials in food-contact applications.
The effectiveness of active packaging systems is also strongly influenced by the food matrix itself. Characteristics such as fat content, moisture level, and pH can affect the release kinetics, stability, and bioactivity of the compounds. For instance, high fat content may enhance the migration of lipophilic molecules, while acidic environments can promote or degrade specific phenolic structures. These interactions must be considered when designing tailored packaging solutions for specific food types. Looking ahead, efforts should be directed toward the development of open source databases of validated formulations, the standardization of migration and sensory testing methods, and the creation of regulatory roadmaps to facilitate market entry of bioactive films. Intelligent packaging integrating active functions with sensorial or indicator technologies may also offer valuable synergies in quality control. In the future, interdisciplinary collaboration between food scientists, materials engineers, chemists, and regulatory bodies will be essential to bridge the gap between academic research and commercial viability. However, these collaborations should be focused on specific goals such as scaling encapsulation methods, optimizing formulations for different food matrices, and addressing safety and legislative barriers.
Ultimately, emission-active packaging represents a promising pathway toward safer, more sustainable food systems. To fully realize this potential, concrete actions must be taken at both the scientific and regulatory levels, aimed at improving functional performance, safety, and consumer acceptance. These objectives are inherently aligned with the circular economy framework, which promotes material reuse, biodegradability, and the functional recovery of resources within the food-packaging–waste cycle.
Despite the promising advances reported in recent years, it is important to highlight certain methodological limitations observed in the reviewed studies. A significant number of works are based on in vitro conditions, which may not fully replicate the complexity of real food systems or commercial storage environments, limiting their applicability at the industrial scale. Sensory evaluations involving consumer panels are often absent, making it difficult to predict acceptance of the final product. Furthermore, the lack of standardized methodologies for extraction, encapsulation, film formation, and release kinetics hampers direct comparison between studies. Toxicological assessments related to the long-term effects of active compound migration are also scarce, as are comprehensive studies on environmental impact. Addressing these limitations through interdisciplinary collaboration, real-world validation, and data sharing will be crucial to bring these packaging systems closer to industrial adoption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.A.; methodology, M.A.A., R.R.-S. and C.H.B.; validation, F.V., A.S.S., S.T. and A.L.F.; investigation, M.A.A., R.R.-S. and C.H.B.; data curation, M.A.A., R.R.-S. and C.H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.A., R.R.-S. and C.H.B.; writing—review and editing, M.A.A., F.V. and A.S.S.; supervision, M.A.A., F.V. and A.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out in the frame of the CardAPium project, funded by Portuguese national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Educação, Ciência e Inovação) through the grant 2023.15813.PEX (https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.15813.PEX). This work was also supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/MECI through the MEtRICs research unit (UID/4077: Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Cássia H. Barbosa thanks the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, for her Ph.D. Grant 2021.08154.BD (https://doi.org/10.54499/2021.08154.BD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EOEssential oil
UVUltraviolet radiation
IRInfrared radiation
MAEMicrowave-assisted extraction
UAEUltrasound-assisted extraction
SFESupercritical fluid extraction
PLEPressurized liquid extraction
PLAPoly (lactic acid)
MDAMalonaldehyde
CSChitosan
COClove oil
NINisin
TEOTurmeric essential oil
PVAPoly(vinyl alcohol)
PEGPoly(ethylene glycol)
PVPPolyvinylpyrrolidone

References

  1. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 on Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food. 2004. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32004R1935 (accessed on 8 June 2025).
  2. Yildirim, S.; Röcker, B.; Pettersen, M.K.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Ayhan, Z.; Rutkaite, R.; Radusin, T.; Suminska, P.; Marcos, B.; Coma, V. Active Packaging Applications for Food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. European Parliament and Council; European Commission; European Parliament and Council. European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Food Additives. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2008, 354, 16–33. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barzegar, F.; Nabizadeh, S.; Kamankesh, M.; Ghasemi, J.B.; Mohammadi, A. Recent Advances in Natural Product-Based Nanoemulsions as Promising Substitutes for Hazardous Synthetic Food Additives: A New Revolution in Food Processing. Food Bioproc Tech. 2024, 17, 1087–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bautista-Hernández, I.; Gómez-García, R.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.G.; Medina-Herrera, N.; González-Hernández, M.D. Unlocking Essential Oils’ Potential as Sustainable Food Additives: Current State and Future Perspectives for Industrial Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, X.; Shang, S.; Yan, F.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, G.; Tian, S.; Chen, R.; Chen, D.; Dang, Y. Antioxidant Activities of Essential Oils and Their Major Components in Scavenging Free Radicals, Inhibiting Lipid Oxidation and Reducing Cellular Oxidative Stress. Molecules 2023, 28, 4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, X.; Lan, W.; Xie, J. Natural Phenolic Compounds: Antimicrobial Properties, Antimicrobial Mechanisms, and Potential Utilization in the Preservation of Aquatic Products. Food Chem. 2024, 440, 138198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de la Rosa, L.A.; Moreno-Escamilla, J.O.; Rodrigo-García, J.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E. Phenolic Compounds. In Postharvest Physiology and Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 253–271. ISBN 9780128132784. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Andrade, M.; Sanches-Silva, A. Essential Oils. In Food Additives and Human Health; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2020; pp. 104–119. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ríos, J.-L. Essential Oils: What They Are and How the Terms Are Used and Defined. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 3–10. ISBN 9780124166417. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andrade, M.A.; Barbosa, C.H.; Shah, M.A.; Ahmad, N.; Vilarinho, F.; Khwaldia, K.; Silva, A.S.; Ramos, F. Citrus By-Products: Valuable Source of Bioactive Compounds for Food Applications. Antioxidants 2022, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An Overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stobiecki, M.; Kachlicki, P. Isolation and Identification of Flavonoids. In The Science of Flavonoids; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 47–69. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheynier, V. Phenolic Compounds: From Plants to Foods. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singla, R.K.; Dubey, A.K.; Garg, A.; Sharma, R.K.; Fiorino, M.; Ameen, S.M.; Haddad, M.A.; Al-Hiary, M. Natural Polyphenols: Chemical Classification, Definition of Classes, Subcategories, and Structures. J. AOAC Int. 2019, 102, 1397–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crozier, A.; Jaganath, I.B.; Clifford, M.N. Phenols, Polyphenols and Tannins: An Overview. In Plant Secondary Metabolites; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gómez-Contreras, P.; Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Hernández-Fernández, J.; Cortés Rodríguez, M.; Ortega-Toro, R. Effect of Different Essential Oils on the Properties of Edible Coatings Based on Yam (Dioscorea Rotundata, L.) Starch and Its Application in Strawberry (Fragaria Vesca L.) Preservation. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sabry, R.; Sayed, A.; El-Sayed, I.E.T.; Mahmoud, G.A. Optimizing Pectin-Based Biofilm Properties for Food Packaging via E-Beam Irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2025, 229, 112474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liang, W.; Ge, X.; Lin, Q.; Niu, L.; Zhao, W.; Muratkhan, M.; Li, W. Ternary Composite Degradable Plastics Based on Alpinia Galanga Essential Oil Pickering Emulsion Templates: A Potential Multifunctional Active Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 257, 128580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wardak, M.H.; Nkede, F.N.; Van, T.T.; Meng, F.; Xirui, Y.; Jothi, J.S.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Development of a Coating Material Composed of Sodium Alginate and Kiwifruit Seed Essential Oil to Enhance Persimmon Fruit Quality Using a Novel Partial Coating Technique. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 45, 101331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, S.J.; Riahi, Z.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Development of Innovative Active Packaging Films Using Gelatin/Pullulan-Based Composites Incorporated with Cinnamon Essential Oil-Loaded Metal-Organic Frameworks for Meat Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sreekanth, K.; Sharath, K.P.; Midhun Dominic, C.D.; Divya, M.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Microbial Load Reduction in Stored Raw Beef Meat Using Chitosan/Starch-Based Active Packaging Films Incorporated with Cellulose Nanofibers and Cinnamon Essential Oil. Meat Sci. 2024, 216, 109552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.; Ahuja, A.; Madan, M.; Singh, D.; Rastogi, V.K. Active Packaging Film of Poly(Lactic Acid) Incorporated with Plant-Based Essential Oils of Trachyspermum Ammi as an Antimicrobial Agent and Vanilla as an Aroma Corrector for Waffles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 135086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; Xu, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, H. Development of κ-Carrageenan/Tourmaline Composite for Active Food Packaging Applications: Improved Mechanical, Gas Barrier, and Antimicrobial. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 354, 123304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lima, D.A.S.; Grisi, C.V.B.; Florentino, G.I.B.; Santos, M.M.F.; Galvao, M.d.S.; Madruga, M.S.; Silva, F.A.P. da Development and Characterization of an Aromatic and Antioxidant Active Film Based on Myofibrillar Protein from Fish By-Products and Passion Fruit Essential Oil. Food Chem. 2025, 474, 143125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, D. Preparation, Characterisation, and Application of Gelatin/Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Peach Gum Ternary Composite Microcapsules for Encapsulating Sweet Orange Essential Oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 299, 140218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Censi, V.; Saiano, F.; Bongiorno, D.; Indelicato, S.; Napoli, A.; Piazzese, D. Bioplastics: A New Analytical Challenge. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mastalygina, E.E.; Aleksanyan, K.V. Recent Approaches to the Plasticization of Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) (A Review). Polymers 2023, 16, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xu, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Antimicrobial and Controlled Release Properties of Nanocomposite Film Containing Thymol and Carvacrol Loaded UiO-66-NH2 for Active Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gumienna, M.; Górna, B. Antimicrobial Food Packaging with Biodegradable Polymers and Bacteriocins. Molecules 2021, 26, 3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vianna, T.C.; Marinho, C.O.; Marangoni Júnior, L.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Vieira, R.P. Essential Oils as Additives in Active Starch-Based Food Packaging Films: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 1803–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Falleh, H.; Ben Jemaa, M.; Saada, M.; Ksouri, R. Essential Oils: A Promising Eco-Friendly Food Preservative. Food Chem. 2020, 330, 127268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Han Lyn, F.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Noranizan, M.A.; Tan, T.B.; Nur Hanani, Z.A. Recent Advances in Extruded Polylactic Acid-Based Composites for Food Packaging: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jadhav, J.J.; Jadeja, G.C.; Desai, M.A. Ultrasound-Assisted Hydrodistillation for Extraction of Essential Oil from Clove Buds—A Step towards Process Improvement and Sustainable Outcome. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2023, 189, 109404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kalkan, S.; Ergínkaya, Z. Impact of Whey Protein Isolate Coatings Containing Different Antimicrobial Agents on Sliced Bologna-Type Sausage during Refrigerated Storage. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 40, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Surendhiran, D.; Roy, V.C.; Park, J.-S.; Chun, B.-S. Fabrication of Chitosan-Based Food Packaging Film Impregnated with Turmeric Essential Oil (TEO)-Loaded Magnetic-Silica Nanocomposites for Surimi Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 203, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sethunga, M.; Gunathilake, K.D.P.P.; Ranaweera, K.K.D.S.; Munaweera, I. Antimicrobial and Antioxidative Electrospun Cellulose Acetate-Essential Oils Nanofibrous Membranes for Active Food Packaging to Extend the Shelf Life of Perishable Fruits. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 97, 103802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khazani, B.; Almasi, H.; Mohtarami, F.; Amjadi, S. Incorporation of Artemisia Essential Oil Loaded Chitosomes in Salep Based Film for Use in Toast Bread Packaging: New Generation of Active Films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 43, 101305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Jin, X.; Hu, J.; Tao, Y.; Lu, J.; Xia, X.; Tan, M.; Du, J.; Wang, H. Structurally Robust Chitosan-Based Active Packaging Film by Pickering Emulsion Containing Tree Essential Oil for Pork Preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 466, 142246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, C.-Y.; Li, K.; Wang, Y.; Du, M.-T.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.-T.; Zhou, Y.-F.; Bai, Y.-H. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial PSE-like Chicken Protein Isolate Films Loaded with Oregano Essential Oil Nanoemulsion for Pork Preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 475, 143355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhong, C.; Bao, S.; Shen, K.; Shu, M.; Geng, J.; Wu, G. Characterization and Coating Application of Composite Gelatin Packaging Containing Eucalyptus Leaf Essential Oil Liposome and Phage Endolysin for Preservation of Pacific White Shrimp (Penaeus Vannamei). Food Control 2025, 169, 111017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. da Costa, R.C.; Ineichen, A.P.; Teixeira, C.D.S.; Bellettini, I.C.; Carli, L.N. Release of Oregano Essential Oil from PHBV Films in Simulated Food Conditionsa. Polímeros 2022, 32, e2022028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Burt, S. Essential Oils: Their Antibacterial Properties and Potential Applications in Foods—A Review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. De-Montijo-Prieto, S.; Razola-Díaz, M.d.C.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Guerra-Hernandez, E.J.; Jiménez-Valera, M.; Garcia-Villanova, B.; Ruiz-Bravo, A.; Verardo, V. Essential Oils from Fruit and Vegetables, Aromatic Herbs, and Spices: Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities. Biology 2021, 10, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Abers, M.; Schroeder, S.; Goelz, L.; Sulser, A.; Rose, T.S.; Puchalski, K.; Langland, J. Antimicrobial Activity of the Volatile Substances from Essential Oils. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kholiya, S.; Singh, M.; Chauhan, A.; Padalia, R.C.; Tiwari, A. Chemical Profiling and Bioactivity Analysis of Shoots and Roots Essential Oil of Indian Blumea Mollis (D. Don) Merr. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2024, 117, 104913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential Oils in Food Preservation: Mode of Action, Synergies, and Interactions with Food Matrix Components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 37–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yousuf, B.; Wu, S.; Siddiqui, M.W. Incorporating Essential Oils or Compounds Derived Thereof into Edible Coatings: Effect on Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh/Fresh-Cut Produce. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. de Souza Junior, E.T.; Siqueira, L.M.; Almeida, R.N.; Lucas, A.M.; Silva, C.G.F.d.; Cassel, E.; Vargas, R.M.F. Comparison of Different Extraction Techniques of Zingiber Officinale Essential Oil. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2020, 63, e20190213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, X.; Yang, S.; Lu, Q.; Zhu, M.; Chen, C. The Property Differences of Essential Oils Extracted by Two Methods from Dolichos Lablab Flowers: Chemical Composition, Anti-Microorganism and Cholinesterase Inhibition Activities. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 42, 101843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miloudi, S.; Abbad, I.; Soulaimani, B.; Ferradous, A.; Abbad, A.; El Mouden, E.H. Optimization of Herbicidal Activity of Essential Oil Mixtures from Satureja Alpina, Thymus Satureioides and Myrtus Communis on Seed Germination and Post-Emergence Growth of Amaranthus Retroflexus L. Crop Prot. 2024, 180, 106642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Manssouri, M.; Znini, M.; Majidi, L. Studies on the antioxidant activity of essential oil and various extracts of Ammodaucus leucotrichus Coss. & Dur. Fruits from Morocco. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2020, 14, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, D.-S.; Cho, S.-M.; Kim, J.-C.; Park, M.-J.; Choi, I.-G. Antioxidant Properties of 7 Domestic Essential Oils and Identification of Physiologically Active Components of Essential Oils against Candida Albicans. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yasir, M.; Nawaz, A.; Ghazanfar, S.; Okla, M.K.; Chaudhary, A.; Al, W.H.; Ajmal, M.N.; AbdElgawad, H.; Ahmad, Z.; Abbas, F.; et al. Anti-Bacterial Activity of Essential Oils against Multidrug-Resistant Foodborne Pathogens Isolated from Raw Milk. Braz. J. Biol. 2024, 84, e259449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mangalagiri, N.P.; Panditi, S.K.; Jeevigunta, N.L.L. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Plant Oils and Their Major Components. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Targino de Souza Pedrosa, G.; Pimentel, T.C.; Gavahian, M.; Lucena de Medeiros, L.; Pagán, R.; Magnani, M. The Combined Effect of Essential Oils and Emerging Technologies on Food Safety and Quality. LWT 2021, 147, 111593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alvarenga, J.P.; Braga, A.F.; Pacheco, F.V.; de Carvalho, A.A.; Pinto, J.E.B.P.; Bertolucci, S.K.V. Seasonal Variation in Essential Oil Content and Chemical Profile of Mint in Southeast of Brazil. Ciência Rural. 2021, 51, e20200979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cipriano, R.R.; Maia, B.H.L.N.S.; Deschamps, C. Chemical Variability of Essential Oils of Eugenia Uniflora L. Genotypes and Their Antioxidant Activity. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2021, 93, e20181299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Assaggaf, H.M.; Naceiri Mrabti, H.; Rajab, B.S.; Attar, A.A.; Alyamani, R.A.; Hamed, M.; El Omari, N.; El Menyiy, N.; Hazzoumi, Z.; Benali, T.; et al. Chemical Analysis and Investigation of Biological Effects of Salvia Officinalis Essential Oils at Three Phenological Stages. Molecules 2022, 27, 5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. dos Santos, S.M.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; de Oliveira Junior, P.C.; da Silva, M.E.; Pereira, Z.V.; Silva, R.M.M.F.; Formagio, A.S.N. Seasonal and Geographical Variation in the Chemical Composition of Essential Oil from Allophylus Edulis Leaves. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 154, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gandomi Hosnaroodi, V.; Ghavam, M. Evaluation of the Effect of Soil and Irrigation Water Characteristics on the Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Mentha Spicata L. Essential Oil: A Plant Used in Traditional Medicine of Kashan People. Agric. Water Manag. 2025, 309, 109331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qian, Q.; Zhuo, Z.; Peng, Y.; Xu, D. Chemical Composition Variation in Essential Oil and Their Correlation with Climate Factors in Chinese Prickly Ash Peels (Zanthoxylum Armatum DC.) from Different Habitats. Molecules 2024, 29, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Carson, C.F.; Hammer, K.A. Chemistry and Bioactivity of Essential Oils. In Lipids and Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 203–238. [Google Scholar]
  64. Eslahi, H.; Fahimi, N.; Sardarian, A.R. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils. In Essential Oils in Food Processing; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 119–171. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Wang, M. Basic Sensory Properties of Essential Oils from Aromatic Plants and Their Applications: A Critical Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6990–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Meng, F.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, D. Encapsulation of Zanthoxylum Bungeanum Essential Oil to Enhance Flavor Stability and Inhibit Lipid Oxidation of Chinese-style Sausage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 4035–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Soetjipto, H.; Aminu, N.R. Positive and Negative Impacts of the Use of Essential Oils in Food. In Essential Oils; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 191–217. [Google Scholar]
  68. Cesca, R.S.; Fonseca, G.G.; da Paz, M.F.; Cortez-Vega, W.R. Advances and Perspectives on the Application of Essential Oils in Food Packaging Films, Coatings, and Nanoencapsulated Materials. Bragantia 2024, 83, e20230132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De Farias, P.M.; De Sousa, R.V.; Maniglia, B.C.; Pascall, M.; Matthes, J.; Sadzik, A.; Schmid, M.; Fai, A.E.C. Biobased Food Packaging Systems Functionalized with Essential Oil via Pickering Emulsion: Advantages, Challenges, and Current Applications. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 4173–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vilela, C.; Kurek, M.; Hayouka, Z.; Röcker, B.; Yildirim, S.; Antunes, M.D.C.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Pettersen, M.K.; Freire, C.S.R. A Concise Guide to Active Agents for Active Food Packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tiekstra, S.; Dopico-Parada, A.; Koivula, H.; Lahti, J.; Buntinx, M. Holistic Approach to a Successful Market Implementation of Active and Intelligent Food Packaging. Foods 2021, 10, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Herrmann, C.; Rhein, S.; Sträter, K.F. Consumers’ Sustainability-Related Perception of and Willingness-to-Pay for Food Packaging Alternatives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 181, 106219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Deshmukh, R.K.; Gaikwad, K.K. Natural Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds for Active Food Packaging Applications. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 4419–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dutta, D.; Sit, N. Application of Natural Extracts as Active Ingredient in Biopolymer Based Packaging Systems. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 1888–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, C.; Chen, L.; Mao, C.; Jin, L.; Wu, S.; Zheng, Y.; Cui, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, S.; et al. Natural Extracts for Antibacterial Applications. Small 2024, 20, e2306553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xie, Q.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X. Active Edible Films with Plant Extracts: A Updated Review of Their Types, Preparations, Reinforcing Properties, and Applications in Muscle Foods Packaging and Preservation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 11425–11447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sheibani, S.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Qazanfarzadeh, Z.; Osadee Wijekoon, M.M.J.; Mohd Rozalli, N.H.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A. Sustainable Strategies for Using Natural Extracts in Smart Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pappas, V.M.; Samanidis, I.; Stavropoulos, G.; Athanasiadis, V.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Bozinou, E.; Makris, D.P.; Lalas, S.I. Analysis of Five-Extraction Technologies’ Environmental Impact on the Polyphenols Production from Moringa Oleifera Leaves Using the Life Cycle Assessment Tool Based on ISO 14040. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Peron, G.; Ferrarese, I.; Carmo Dos Santos, N.; Rizzo, F.; Gargari, G.; Bertoli, N.; Gobbi, E.; Perosa, A.; Selva, M.; Dall’Acqua, S. Sustainable Extraction of Bioactive Compounds and Nutrients from Agri-Food Wastes: Potential Reutilization of Berry, Honey, and Chicory Byproducts. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chaari, M.; Elhadef, K.; Akermi, S.; Ben Akacha, B.; Fourati, M.; Chakchouk Mtibaa, A.; Ennouri, M.; Sarkar, T.; Shariati, M.A.; Rebezov, M.; et al. Novel Active Food Packaging Films Based on Gelatin-Sodium Alginate Containing Beetroot Peel Extract. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rodrigues Arruda, T.; Campos Bernardes, P.; Robledo Fialho e Moraes, A.; de Fátima Ferreira Soares, N. Natural Bioactives in Perspective: The Future of Active Packaging Based on Essential Oils and Plant Extracts Themselves and Those Complexed by Cyclodextrins. Food Res. Int. 2022, 156, 111160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mellinas, A.C.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M.C. Pectin-Based Films with Cocoa Bean Shell Waste Extract and ZnO/Zn-NPs with Enhanced Oxygen Barrier, Ultraviolet Screen and Photocatalytic Properties. Foods 2020, 9, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rambabu, K.; Bharath, G.; Banat, F.; Show, P.L.; Cocoletzi, H.H. Mango Leaf Extract Incorporated Chitosan Antioxidant Film for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Todhanakasem, T.; Jaiprayat, C.; Sroysuwan, T.; Suksermsakul, S.; Suwapanich, R.; Maleenont, K.K.; Koombhongse, P.; Young, B.M. Active Thermoplastic Starch Film with Watermelon Rind Extract for Future Biodegradable Food Packaging. Polymers 2022, 14, 3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Andrade, M.A.; Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Guerra, M.; Sanches-Silva, A. Evaluation of the Oxidative Status of Salami Packaged with an Active Whey Protein Film. Foods 2019, 8, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Istiqomah, A.; Prasetyo, W.E.; Firdaus, M.; Kusumaningsih, T. Antibacterial Evaluation of Garlic Extracts on Chitosan/Starch Packaging Film Using Response Surface Methodology and Its Application for Shelf-Life Extension of Bell Peppers (Capsicum Annuum). J. Food Sci. 2024, 14, 6523–6538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ma, J.; Ye, G.; Jia, S.; Ma, H.; Jia, D.; He, J.; Lv, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, F.; Gou, K.; et al. Preparation of Chitosan/Peony (Paeonia Suffruticosa Andr.) Leaf Extract Composite Film and Its Application in Sustainable Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 2200–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fan, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Feng, X. Incorporating Portulaca Oleracea Extract Endows the Chitosan-Starch Film with Antioxidant Capacity for Chilled Meat Preservation. Food Chem. X 2023, 18, 100662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zeb, A. Concept, Mechanism, and Applications of Phenolic Antioxidants in Foods. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Andrade, M.; Madella, D.; Martinazzo, A.P.; de Aquino Garcia Moura, L.; de Melo, N.R.; Sanches-Silva, A. Revisiting an Ancient Spice with Medicinal Purposes: Cinnamon. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sun, J.; Leng, X.; Zang, J.; Zhao, G. Bio-Based Antibacterial Food Packaging Films and Coatings Containing Cinnamaldehyde: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Doyle, A.A.; Stephens, J.C. A Review of Cinnamaldehyde and Its Derivatives as Antibacterial Agents. Fitoterapia 2019, 139, 104405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Peng, J.; Song, X.; Yu, W.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jian, H.; He, B. The Role and Mechanism of Cinnamaldehyde in Cancer. J. Food Drug Anal. 2024, 32, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Aragón-Gutiérrez, A.; Heras-Mozos, R.; Gallur, M.; López, D.; Gavara, R.; Hernández-Muñoz, P. Hot-Melt-Extruded Active Films Prepared from EVOH/Trans-Cinnamaldehyde Blends Intended for Food Packaging Applications. Foods 2021, 10, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yu, H.; Huang, X.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y. Incorporation of Cinnamaldehyde, Carvacrol, and Eugenol into Zein Films for Active Food Packaging: Enhanced Mechanical Properties, Antimicrobial Activity, and Controlled Release. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 2846–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mohammadi, M.; Fasihi, M. Eco-Friendly Polylactic Acid/Modified Thermoplastic Starch Films Enhanced with Clove Essential Oil and Cochineal for Dual-Functional Active and Intelligent Food Packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 354, 123320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Doğan, C.; Akgul, Y.; Eticha, A.K.; Doğan, N.; Toptas, A. Innovative Electroblown Nanofibrous Mats Incorporating Sage Essential Oil for Extending Shelf Life of Spreadable Cheese. Food Bioprod. Process. 2025, 150, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Venkatachalam, K.; Lekjing, S. A Chitosan-Based Edible Film with Clove Essential Oil and Nisin for Improving the Quality and Shelf Life of Pork Patties in Cold Storage. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 17777–17786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Molina-Hernández, J.B.; Echeverri Castro, A.; Martinez-Correa, H.A.; Andrade-Mahecha, M.M. Edible Coating Based on Achira Starch Containing Garlic/Oregano Oils to Extend the Shelf Life of Double Cream Cheese. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin 2020, 73, 9099–9108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Min, T.; Sun, X.; Yuan, Z.; Zhou, L.; Jiao, X.; Zha, J.; Zhu, Z.; Wen, Y. Novel Antimicrobial Packaging Film Based on Porous Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanofiber and Polymeric Coating for Humidity-Controlled Release of Thyme Essential Oil. LWT 2021, 135, 110034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Balan, G.C.; Paulo, A.F.S.; Correa, L.G.; Alvim, I.D.; Ueno, C.T.; Coelho, A.R.; Ströher, G.R.; Yamashita, F.; Sakanaka, L.S.; Shirai, M.A. Production of Wheat Flour/PBAT Active Films Incorporated with Oregano Oil Microparticles and Its Application in Fresh Pastry Conservation. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2021, 14, 1587–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vasile, C.; Stoleru, E.; Darie-Niţa, R.N.; Dumitriu, R.P.; Pamfil, D.; Tarţau, L. Biocompatible Materials Based on Plasticized Poly(Lactic Acid), Chitosan and Rosemary Ethanolic Extract I. Effect of Chitosan on the Properties of Plasticized Poly(Lactic Acid) Materials. Polymers 2019, 11, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Borzi, F.; Torrieri, E.; Wrona, M.; Nerín, C. Polyamide Modified with Green Tea Extract for Fresh Minced Meat Active Packaging Applications. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Heras-Mozos, R.; Muriel-Galet, V.; López-Carballo, G.; Catalá, R.; Hernández-Muñoz, P.; Gavara, R. Development and Optimization of Antifungal Packaging for Sliced Pan Loaf Based on Garlic as Active Agent and Bread Aroma as Aroma Corrector. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 290, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. dos Passos Braga, S.; Magnani, M.; Madruga, M.S.; de Souza Galvão, M.; de Medeiros, L.L.; Batista, A.U.D.; Dias, R.T.A.; Fernandes, L.R.; de Medeiros, E.S.; de Souza, E.L. Characterization of Edible Coatings Formulated with Chitosan and Mentha Essential Oils and Their Use to Preserve Papaya (Carica Papaya L.). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 65, 102472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Punia Bangar, S.; Whiteside, W.S.; Ozogul, F.; Dunno, K.D.; Cavender, G.A.; Dawson, P. Development of Starch-Based Films Reinforced with Cellulosic Nanocrystals and Essential Oil to Extend the Shelf Life of Red Grapes. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ran, C.; Li, Q.; Zhao, M.; Cui, H.; Yang, Y.; Diao, K.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Dong, J.; Wang, Q. Gelatin/Polyvinyl Alcohol Films Loaded with Doubly Stabilized Clove Essential Oil Chitosomes: Preparation, Characterization, and Application in Packing Marinated Steaks. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cheng, H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Xie, J. Effects of Orthogonal Dual-Frequency Ultrasound-Assisted Treatment Combined with Bioactive Coating Containing Melissa Officinalis L. Essential Oil on Changes in Quality, Lipid, and Protein of Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena Crocea) during Cold Storage. Food Chem. X 2024, 24, 101861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Li, L.; Wu, C.; Chen, Q.; Shi, Z.; Xu, K.; Niu, Y.; Rao, X. Preparation of Dehydroabietic Acid Modified Chitosan/Wintergreen Essential Oil Film and Mandarin Freshness Preservation Study. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kan, J.; Liu, J.; Yong, H.; Liu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Liu, J. Development of Active Packaging Based on Chitosan-Gelatin Blend Films Functionalized with Chinese Hawthorn (Crataegus Pinnatifida) Fruit Extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hanif, J.; Khalid, N.; Khan, R.S.; Bhatti, M.F.; Hayat, M.Q.; Ismail, M.; Andleeb, S.; Mansoor, Q.; Khan, F.; Amin, F.; et al. Formulation of Active Packaging System Using Artemisia Scoparia for Enhancing Shelf Life of Fresh Fruits. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sun, M.; Liu, N.; Ni, S.; Bian, H.; Fu, Y.; Chen, X. Poplar Hot Water Extract Enhances Barrier and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan/Bentonite Composite Film for Packaging Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Stoll, L.; Rech, R.; Flôres, S.H.; Nachtigall, S.M.B.; de Oliveira Rios, A. Poly(Acid Lactic) Films with Carotenoids Extracts: Release Study and Effect on Sunflower Oil Preservation. Food Chem. 2019, 281, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kadam, D.; Momin, B.; Palamthodi, S.; Lele, S.S. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Chitosan-Based Nano-Composite Films Incorporated with Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 211, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hu, X.; Yuan, L.; Han, L.; Li, S.; Song, L. Characterization of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Gelatin Films Incorporated with: Ginkgo Biloba Extract. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 27449–27454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ahmadi, R.; Tanomand, A.; Kazeminava, F.; Kamounah, F.S.; Ayaseh, A.; Ganbarov, K.; Yousefi, M.; Katourani, A.; Yousefi, B.; Kafil, H.S. Fabrication and Characterization of a Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles Reinforced Bio-Nanocomposite Containing Miswak (Salvadora Persica L.) Extract—The Antimicrobial, Thermo-Physical and Barrier Properties. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 3439–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Vicente, A.A.; Reis, M.A.M.; Torres-Giner, S.; Lagaron, J.M. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Performance of Various Essential Oils and Natural Extracts and Their Incorporation into Biowaste Derived Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Layers Made from Electrospun Ultrathin Fibers. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tran, T.N.; Mai, B.T.; Setti, C.; Athanassiou, A. Transparent Bioplastic Derived from CO2 -Based Polymer Functionalized with Oregano Waste Extract toward Active Food Packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 46667–46677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Kalkan, S.; Otağ, M.R.; Engin, M.S. Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties of Edible Methylcellulose Films Containing Rheum Ribes L. Extract. Food Chem. 2020, 307, 125524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Jiang, W. Development of Antioxidant Chitosan Film with Banana Peels Extract and Its Application as Coating in Maintaining the Storage Quality of Apple. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Safaei, M.; Roosta Azad, R. Preparation and Characterization of Poly-Lactic Acid Based Films Containing Propolis Ethanolic Extract to Be Used in Dry Meat Sausage Packaging. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Solaberrieta, I.; Jiménez, A.; Cacciotti, I.; Garrigós, M.C. Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds from Aloe Vera Agrowastes in Electrospun Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Menzel, C.; González-Martínez, C.; Vilaplana, F.; Diretto, G.; Chiralt, A. Incorporation of Natural Antioxidants from Rice Straw into Renewable Starch Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 976–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Martiny, T.R.; Raghavan, V.; de Moraes, C.C.; da Rosa, G.S.; Dotto, G.L. Bio-Based Active Packaging: Carrageenan Film with Olive Leaf Extract for Lamb Meat Preservation. Foods 2020, 9, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chollakup, R.; Kongtud, W.; Sukatta, U.; Premchookiat, M.; Piriyasatits, K.; Nimitkeatkai, H.; Jarerat, A. Eco-Friendly Rice Straw Paper Coated with Longan (Dimocarpus Longan) Peel Extract as Bio-Based and Antibacterial Packaging. Polymers 2021, 13, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Huang, X.; Zhou, X.; Dai, Q.; Qin, Z. Antibacterial, Antioxidation, UV-Blocking, and Biodegradable Soy Protein Isolate Food Packaging Film with Mangosteen Peel Extract and ZnO Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wen, P.; Hu, T.G.; Wen, Y.; Li, K.E.; Qiu, W.P.; He, Z.L.; Wang, H.; Wu, H. Development of Nervilia Fordii Extract-Loaded Electrospun Pva/Pvp Nanocomposite for Antioxidant Packaging. Foods 2021, 10, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Kumar, P.; Tanwar, R.; Gupta, V.; Upadhyay, A.; Kumar, A.; Gaikwad, K.K. Pineapple Peel Extract Incorporated Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Corn Starch Film for Active Food Packaging: Preparation, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Mileriene, J.; Serniene, L.; Henriques, M.; Gomes, D.; Pereira, C.; Kondrotiene, K.; Kasetiene, N.; Lauciene, L.; Sekmokiene, D.; Malakauskas, M. Effect of Liquid Whey Protein Concentrate–Based Edible Coating Enriched with Cinnamon Carbon Dioxide Extract on the Quality and Shelf Life of Eastern European Curd Cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1504–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Dordevic, S.; Dordevic, D.; Sedlacek, P.; Kalina, M.; Tesikova, K.; Antonic, B.; Tremlova, B.; Treml, J.; Nejezchlebova, M.; Vapenka, L.; et al. Incorporation of Natural Blueberry, Red Grapes and Parsley Extract By-Products into the Production of Chitosan Edible Films. Polymers 2021, 13, 3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jancikova, S.; Dordevic, D.; Tesikova, K.; Antonic, B.; Tremlova, B. Active Edible Films Fortified with Natural Extracts: Case Study with Fresh-Cut Apple Pieces. Membranes 2021, 11, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Luciano, C.G.; Tessaro, L.; Bonilla, J.; de Balieiro, J.C.C.; Trindade, M.A.; Sobral, P.J.d.A. Application of Bi-Layers Active Gelatin Films for Sliced Dried-Cured Coppa Conservation. Meat Sci. 2022, 189, 108821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Avila, L.B.; Barreto, E.R.C.; Moraes, C.C.; Morais, M.M.; da Rosa, G.S. Promising New Material for Food Packaging: An Active and Intelligent Carrageenan Film with Natural Jaboticaba Additive. Foods 2022, 11, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Khwaldia, K.; M’Rabet, Y.; Boulila, A. Active Food Packaging Films from Alginate and Date Palm Pit Extract: Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Capacity, and Stability. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rodrigues, P.V.; Vieira, D.M.; Martins, P.C.; Martins, V.G.; Castro, M.C.R.; Machado, A.V. Evaluation of Active LDPE Films for Packaging of Fresh Orange Juice. Polymers 2023, 15, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Guo, Q.; Yuan, Y.; He, M.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B. Development of a Multifunctional Food Packaging for Meat Products by Incorporating Carboxylated Cellulose Nanocrystal and Beetroot Extract into Sodium Alginate Films. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yu, M.; Hou, Y.; Zheng, L.; Han, Y.; Wang, D. Soy Protein Isolate-Based Active Films Functionalized with Zanthoxylum Bungeanum by-Products: Effects on Barrier, Mechanical, Antioxidant and Cherry Tomato Preservation Performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Shah, Y.A.; Jawad, M.; Al-Azri, M.S.; Ullah, S.; Anwer, M.K.; Aldawsari, M.F.; Koca, E.; Aydemir, L.Y. Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan and Sodium Alginate Based Films Incorporated with Ficus Extract. Polymers 2023, 15, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Madureira, J.; Melgar, B.; Alves, V.D.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Margaça, F.M.A.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Barros, L.; Cabo Verde, S. Effect of Olive Pomace Extract Application and Packaging Material on the Preservation of Fresh-Cut Royal Gala Apples. Foods 2023, 12, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nikmanesh, A.; Baghaei, H.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A. Development and Characterization of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Films Based on Potato Starch Incorporating Viola Odorata Extract to Improve the Oxidative and Microbiological Quality of Chicken Fillets during Refrigerated Storage. Foods 2023, 12, 2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Majdi, F.; Alizadeh Behbahani, B.; Barzegar, H.; Mehrnia, M.A.; Taki, M. Active Packaging Coating Based on Lepidium Sativum Seed Mucilage and Propolis Extract: Preparation, Characterization, Application and Modeling the Preservation of Buffalo Meat. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0311802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H. Antioxidant Packaging Films Based upon Starch-Montmorillonite with Forsythia Flower Extract: Characterization and Application. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2024, 41, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Barzan, G.; Sacco, A.; Giovannozzi, A.M.; Portesi, C.; Schiavone, C.; Salafranca, J.; Wrona, M.; Nerín, C.; Rossi, A.M. Development of Innovative Antioxidant Food Packaging Systems Based on Natural Extracts from Food Industry Waste and Moringa Oleifera Leaves. Food Chem. 2024, 432, 137088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Saied, M.; Ward, A.; Hamieda, S.F. Effect of Apricot Kernel Seed Extract on Biophysical Properties of Chitosan Film for Packaging Applications. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Dobrucka, R.; Pawlik, M.; Szymański, M. Green Packaging Films with Antioxidant Activity Based on Pectin and Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract. Molecules 2024, 29, 4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Aldalbahi, A.; Thamer, B.M.; Abdulhameed, M.M.; El-Newehy, M.H. Fabrication of Biodegradable and Antibacterial Films of Chitosan/Polyvinylpyrrolidone Containing Eucalyptus Citriodora Extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hu, F.; Song, Y.Z.; Thakur, K.; Zhang, J.G.; Khan, M.R.; Ma, Y.L.; Wei, Z.J. Blueberry Anthocyanin Based Active Intelligent Wheat Gluten Protein Films: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications for Shrimp Freshness Monitoring. Food Chem. 2024, 453, 139676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hernández-Hernández, F.A.; Gómez-Aldapa, C.A.; Castro-Rosas, J.; Vargas-León, E.A.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Velazquez, G.; Jiménez-Regalado, E.J.; Aguirre-Loredo, R.Y. Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. Extract as a Natural Additive in Food Packaging Biodegradable Films to Improve Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Physicochemical Properties. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2024, 79, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Tonyali, B.; McDaniel, A.; Amamcharla, J.; Trinetta, V.; Yucel, U. Release Kinetics of Cinnamaldehyde, Eugenol, and Thymol from Sustainable and Biodegradable Active Packaging Films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cui, R.; Yan, J.; Cao, J.; Qin, Y.; Yuan, M.; Li, L. Release Properties of Cinnamaldehyde Loaded by Montmorillonite in Chitosan-based Antibacterial Food Packaging. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 3670–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bianchi, F.; Fornari, F.; Riboni, N.; Spadini, C.; Cabassi, C.S.; Iannarelli, M.; Carraro, C.; Mazzeo, P.P.; Bacchi, A.; Orlandini, S.; et al. Development of Novel Cocrystal-Based Active Food Packaging by a Quality by Design Approach. Food Chem. 2021, 347, 129051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Qian, Z.-J.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.-R.; Zhang, Y.-C. Development of Active Packaging Films Based on Liquefied Shrimp Shell Chitin and Polyvinyl Alcohol Containing β-Cyclodextrin/Cinnamaldehyde Inclusion. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 214, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wang, K.; Li, W.; Wu, L.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/Dialdehyde Carboxymethyl Cellulose Composite Film Loaded with Cinnamaldehyde@zein Nanoparticles for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Siddiqui, M.N.; Redhwi, H.H.; Tsagkalias, I.; Vouvoudi, E.C.; Achilias, D.S. Development of Bio-Composites with Enhanced Antioxidant Activity Based on Poly(Lactic Acid) with Thymol, Carvacrol, Limonene, or Cinnamaldehyde for Active Food Packaging. Polymers 2021, 13, 3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Shen, C.; Ma, Y.; Wu, D.; Liu, P.; He, Y.; Chen, K. Preparation of Covalent Organic Framework-Based Nanofibrous Films with Temperature-Responsive Release of Thymol for Active Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2023, 410, 135460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Giannakas, A.E.; Salmas, C.E.; Moschovas, D.; Karabagias, V.K.; Karabagias, I.K.; Baikousi, M.; Georgopoulos, S.; Leontiou, A.; Katerinopoulou, K.; Zafeiropoulos, N.E.; et al. Development, Characterization, and Evaluation as Food Active Packaging of Low-Density-Polyethylene-Based Films Incorporated with Rich in Thymol Halloysite Nanohybrid for Fresh “Scaloppini” Type Pork Meat Fillets Preservation. Polymers 2023, 15, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lan, W.; Liang, X.; Lan, W.; Ahmed, S.; Liu, Y.; Qin, W. Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol/d-Limonene Fibers Prepared by Ultrasonic Processing for Antibacterial Active Packaging Material. Molecules 2019, 24, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hou, C.-Y.; Hazeena, S.H.; Hsieh, S.-L.; Li, B.-H.; Chen, M.-H.; Wang, P.-Y.; Zheng, B.-Q.; Liang, Y.-S. Effect of D-Limonene Nanoemulsion Edible Film on Banana (Musa Sapientum Linn.) Post-Harvest Preservation. Molecules 2022, 27, 6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Cabedo, L.; Lagaron, J.M.; Torres-Giner, S. Development of Electrospun Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Monolayers Containing Eugenol and Their Application in Multilayer Antimicrobial Food Packaging. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Jiang, L.; Han, Y.; Meng, X.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, H. Cellulose Nanocrystals Reinforced Zein/Catechin/β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex Nanoparticles Nanocomposite Film for Active Food Packaging. Polymers 2021, 13, 2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Lv, H.; Xu, H.; Xu, E.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, H.; Yuan, C.; Zhao, M.; Wu, Z.; He, D.; Cui, B. Improving Structural and Functional Properties of Starch-Catechin-Based Green Nanofiber Mats for Active Food Packaging by Electrospinning and Crosslinking Techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Chang, S.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A.; Baghaie, H. Development of an Active Packaging Based on Polyethylene Containing Linalool or Thymol for Mozzarella Cheese. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 3732–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Velázquez-Contreras, F.; García-Caldera, N.; Padilla de la Rosa, J.D.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Núñez-Delicado, E.; Gabaldón, J.A. Effect of PLA Active Packaging Containing Monoterpene-Cyclodextrin Complexes on Berries Preservation. Polymers 2021, 13, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Principal extraction methods for obtaining essential oils from plants.
Figure 1. Principal extraction methods for obtaining essential oils from plants.
Foods 14 02713 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mechanisms of action of essential oil constituents in food preservation.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mechanisms of action of essential oil constituents in food preservation.
Foods 14 02713 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between traditional and greener extraction methods for natural extracts. Greener methods such as MAE and UAE offer advantages, including reduced solvent use and shorter processing time.
Figure 3. Comparison between traditional and greener extraction methods for natural extracts. Greener methods such as MAE and UAE offer advantages, including reduced solvent use and shorter processing time.
Foods 14 02713 g003
Table 1. Summary of Publication Trends on Active Food Packaging (2004–2024).
Table 1. Summary of Publication Trends on Active Food Packaging (2004–2024).
DatabaseSearch KeywordsTotal
Results
Results
(2019–2024)
Results
(2023–2024)
Top JournalsArticle Types
PubMedactive food packaging632044282020Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (1045),
Food Chem. (379),
Polymers (347)
Not specified
Web of Scienceactive food packaging574041911968Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (500),
Food Packag. Sheld Life (315),
Food Hydrocolloids (245)
Reviews: 800
Research papers: 3312
Table 2. Patents covering the use of essential oils in food packaging.
Table 2. Patents covering the use of essential oils in food packaging.
PatentsTitleYear of Publication
CN110396224AA preparation method of anti-oxidative and antibacterial film equipped with cinnamon essential oil Pickering emulsion2019
CN108752610BA kind of edible antibacterial film of slow-release essential oil and preparation method thereof2020
AU2020103921A4Antibacterial compound fiber film, method for preparing the same and application thereof2020
CN113354853BA kind of biodegradable high barrier antibacterial composite film and preparation method thereof2022
CN114411331ANanometer film added with oregano essential oil cyclodextrin inclusion compound and preparation method and application thereof2022
CN113846490BPreservative film with intelligent microbial self-inhibition effect and preparation method thereof2022
CN111440344BA kind of composite seaweed polysaccharide-based double-layer packaging film and its preparation method and application2022
CN113956633BA degradable active packaging material based on ginger essential oil and polylactic acid and its preparation method thereof2022
CN113712072BA clove essential oil Pickering emulsion film preservative and its preparation method and application2023
CN114249926BEdible film and preparation method thereof2023
JP2024513989AEdible spray or coating compositions and methods of making and uses thereof for extending the shelf life of perishable items2024
CN115516046BCoating for food packaging comprising antimicrobial active ingredient2024
KR102735729B1Paper wrapper for packing food with excellent fragrance activity and antimicrobial activity2024
CN113907128BEdible pepper essential oil film for fruit and vegetable fresh-keeping and preparation method thereof2024
Table 3. Number of search results combining each individual compound with the keywords ‘active food packaging’ (2019–2024).
Table 3. Number of search results combining each individual compound with the keywords ‘active food packaging’ (2019–2024).
CompoundPubMedWeb of ScienceScopus
Thymol87125466
Cinnamaldehyde68112420
Limonene3837257
Carvacrol80161483
Eugenol4683376
Vanillin1915145
Linalool2929180
Citral1831138
α-Pinene78117
Citric acid6584567
Gallic acid91100582
Quercetin5056397
Resveratrol1614172
Catechin3937305
Epicatechin4212122
Table 4. Studies with active packaging examples using essential oils as active components.
Table 4. Studies with active packaging examples using essential oils as active components.
Essential OilPolymerPackaging Preparation MethodFood Matrix (Applied)Main ResultsRef.
Mentha piperita; Mentha x villosa HudsChitosan
(CS)
CoatingsPapaya (Carica papaya L.)EOs were incorporated into chitosan-based coatings to inhibit fungi growth during papaya storage in refrigerators. Formulated coatings did not affect papaya sensory acceptability.[105]
Basil, coriander, pimento, rosemary, thymeWhey protein isolateCoatingSliced bologna-type sausageCoatings incorporating pimento EO provided the most effective inactivation against Listeria innocua followed by thyme, basil, coriander, and rosemary EO.
Coatings containing thyme essential oil were the best sensory coating types.
[35]
Clove (C)CSCastingPork patties in cold storageBased on sensory and microbiological evaluations, the shelf life of pork patties was 6 days for control, 9 days for CS and CS-Nisin, and 12 days for CS-C and CS-C-Nisin (CS-C-NI). C showed high antioxidant activity, and the combination of C and CS may enhance oxidative stability of pork patties during storage. CS-C-NI combination treatment has excellent microbial inhibition due to synergistic bactericidal effects.[98]
Thyme (encapsulated into porous poly (lactic acid) nanofibers—PLA)Poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(ethylene glycol)—(PVA/PEG)ElectrospinningStrawberriesThyme essential oil significantly inhibited bacterial survival in vitro. The slower release of TEO from the PLA/TEO/PVA/PEG composite films, compared to the PLA/TEO nanofibers, contributed to the extended shelf life of the strawberries. PLA/TEO/PVA/PEG film shows higher microbial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.[100]
Oregano
(free and microencapsulate)
Wheat flour and poly (butylene co-terephthalate adipate)Blown extrusionBrazilian fresh pastry (known as pastel)Fresh pastries packaged with film incorporating oregano essential oil microparticles exhibited lower mold and yeast counts during 28 days of refrigerated storage compared to those packaged with control film or film containing free oregano EO. This may have occurred due to the slow and gradual migration of the OEO from the film to the food surface.[101]
Turmeric (TEO);
turmeric (encapsulated into magnetic/silica porous core–shell nanocomposites-MNPs/Si)
CSCastingSurimiThe CS/TEO film effectively inhibited Bacillus cereus growth, significantly reducing the bacterial population for up to 6 days of storage. However, due to the rapid and uncontrolled release of TEO when directly incorporated into the film, bacterial growth resumed. In contrast, the CS/MNPs/Si/TEO film maintained reduced bacterial proliferation, until the end of storage (14 days), likely due to the slow release of TEO. Both films prevented surimi protein oxidation, suggesting TEO’s antioxidant potential.[36]
CloveCellulosic nanocrystals obtained from the Kudzu plant (Pueraria montana), and corn starchCastingRed grapesThe films loaded with essential oil exhibited remarkable antimicrobial properties against S. aureus and E. coli. The antimicrobial effect was stronger on S. aureus. In addition, films with essential oils were found to be more efficient in maintaining the fruit’s physical and chemical stability for 15 days at 5 °C.[106]
Clove (doubly stabilized oil chitosome nanoparticles (CNPs))Gelatin/PVA (GEL/PVA)CastingMarinated steaksThe presence of CNPs in film suppressed microbial proliferation, decelerated meat product degradation, and preserved the color and freshness of the meat products during storage. This was attributed to the antimicrobial effect of the CNPs.[107]
Trachyspermum ammiPLATape castingWafflesWaffles packed in PLA films containing 50 wt% blend of both oils had their shelf life extended up to 30 days compared to 2 days for the neat PLA film. Vanilla was found to be effective in masking the unpleasant odor of Tammi.[23]
Cinnamon bark and clove budCellulose acetate nanofibersElectrospinningFresh grapes and tomatoesThe use of 50% w/w cinnamon oil (55.56% w/w cinnamaldehyde) and CBO (with 75.82% w/w eugenol)-loaded CANFs as an active food packaging membrane for a shelf-life study of fresh grapes and tomatoes at 4 °C confirmed the microbiological safety of consumption for 40 days and enhanced sensory and physicochemical properties for up to 30 days, compared to just 15 days for the controls.[37]
Artemisia absinthiumSalep gum containing chitosomes
(chitosan-coated essential oil-loaded nanoliposomes)—Salep-NLPs-CH
The film-forming solutions were desiccated at 35 °C for 48 h after being cast onto polystyrene platesToast breadSalep–NLPs–CH film proved most effective in preserving bread color over time due to its antioxidant and antifungal properties. Mold growth was not detected until day 44, attributed to the chitosan and AEO slow release. In contrast, mold appeared earlier on samples packaged with Salep–NLPs and Salep-free AEO films. The Salep–NLPs and Salep–NLPs–CH films exhibited higher overall acceptance, likely due to the preservation of color, aroma, and texture during storage.[38]
CinnamonCS/
Starch
CastingRaw beef meatFilm packaging incorporated into EO with or without cellulose nanofibers had the ability to effectively reduce the bacterial load of raw beef meat samples and thereby enhance the shelf life. This property could be due to the combined effect of the chitosan in starch/chitosan/cellulose along with the CEO present in the active packaging material.[22]
CinnamonGelatin/pullulanThe film-forming solution was poured onto a Teflon-coated glass plate and dried at room temperature for 60 hMeatThe low pH change indicated that meat packaged with active gelatin/pullulan-based composite films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil-loaded metal–organic frameworks can inhibit food quality deterioration after 16 days. The active film maintained the microbial load low. The results show that the incorporation of cinnamon essential oil-loaded metal–organic frameworks helped to prolong the shelf life of beef.[21]
Alpinia galangaPVA-acetylated pullulan polysaccharidesCastingChicken meatAlpinia galanga essential oil components in the composite plastic provided favorable inhibiting the oxidation of proteins and lipids during shelf-life and inhibitory effects against E. coli and S. aureus.[19]
Melissa officinalis LCarboxymethyl chitosan, and locust bean gumCoatingLarge yellow croakers (Pseudosciaena crocea)Ultrasound treatment (US) and a bioactive coating (CMCS), alone and combined, significantly inhibited microbial growth and lipid oxidation in yellow croakers during cold storage. The US+CMCS treatment was the most effective, extending shelf life considerably, compared to control and individual treatments.[108]
Kiwifruit seedSodium alginateFilm by casting and coating materialPersimmon fruitApplying the coating material to persimmon fruit resulted in reduced weight loss and helped maintain both firmness and respiration rate. The antifungal properties of the coating were further enhanced by the addition of EO.[20]
Lavender flowersPolyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)Centrifugal spinningMinced lamb meatOver the storage period, 1%, 3.5%, and 7% LEO nanofiber mats effectively suppressed meat oxidation. Microbial counts remained below acceptable limits for all samples (except for the 1% LEO PVP sample). After 5 days, yeast and mold count in the 3.5% and 7% LEO-containing samples were lower than their initial levels, likely from the intense and controlled release of LEO. The positive antimicrobial effect of the PVP film is attributable to the LEO’s activity against aerobic bacteria.[97]
ClovePLA; polylactic acid/modified thermoplastic starch
(TPS)
Hot pressingShrimpShrimp packaged in polylactic acid incorporated with clove essential oil film (PC) maintained better quality than control (without EO). PC-packaged shrimp stayed below spoilage pH and microbial limits until day 10, compared to the control. The PC film, with its dense, crystalline structure, facilitated the controlled release of clove EO, extending shrimp shelf life.[96]
Tea treeCSSolution was poured into a film-forming container and driedFresh cut porkThe soybean separation protein (SPI)–carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) emulsion (SCCE) containing tea tree essential oil (TTO) incorporated into CS matrix controlled the slow release of antibacterial and antioxidant TTO into the packaging microenvironments, prolonging the pork shelf life by 6 days. [39]
OreganoPSE-like chicken protein isolate (PPI)The film-forming solution was poured into polyethylene and dried in the ovenFresh porkOregano EO-loaded nanoemulsion PPI films were tested for antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus using the disk diffusion method. However, no significant effect against E. coli was revealed. The film with 2.5% oregano EO proved the highest effective in inhibiting bacterial growth and quality deterioration in refrigerated pork, thus extending its shelf life.[40]
WintergreenDehydroabietic acid (DHA) modified chitosanThe film-forming solution was poured into the mold to form a filmMandarin orangesFilms incorporated into EO were able to delay the loss of antioxidant activity, improve the antifungal property against penicillium and prolonging the shelf life of mandarins up to 18 days.[109]
Legend: EO—essential oil; CS—chitosan; PLA—polylactic acid; PVA—poly(vinyl alcohol); PEG—poly(ethylene glycol); PVP—polyvinylpyrrolidone; CFU—colony forming unit.
Table 5. Studies with active packaging examples using natural extracts as active components.
Table 5. Studies with active packaging examples using natural extracts as active components.
Natural ExtractPolymerIncorporation MethodFood MatrixMain ResultsRef.
Green tea extract Food contact polyamide (Nylon 6)Adsorption techniqueFresh minced beefThe active film incorporated with green tea extract presented excellent antioxidant capacity. The polyamide exhibited good film-forming properties with green tea extract incorporated. The active film protected the beef’s color, as well as its lipid oxidation and variation in metmyoglobin values up to 23 days at 4 °C.[103]
Chinese hawthorn fruit extractChitosan–gelatin blend filmCasting method-Chinese hawthorn fruit extract was successfully incorporated in a chitosan–gelatin blend film. The active film presented significantly improved mechanical and water vapor barrier properties. The addition of the extract also improved the light barrier and antioxidant properties of chitosan–gelatin films. The main polyphenols identified were epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, and procyanidin B2.[110]
Mango leaf extract ChitosanCasting methodCashew nutsThe addition of mango leaf extract increased the film’s antioxidant activity, thickness, opacity, tensile strength, and surface hydrophobicity. On the contrary, it reduced the water vapor permeability, water solubility, and elongation at break. The active film was able to protect cashew nuts from oxidation for 28 days, compared to commercial films.[83]
Silver nanoparticle extract of Artemisia scopariaCalcium alginateIncorporation/casting methodStrawberries and loquatsA significant enhancement was observed in the quality parameters of strawberries and loquats, including reduced acidity loss, minimized soluble solid content and weight loss, and overall quality preservation. The active coating also demonstrated high antimicrobial activities.[111]
Poplar hot water extract Bentonite and chitosanCasting method-The active film with poplar hot water extract incorporated presented greater antioxidant properties, enhanced UV blocking properties, and improved water vapor and oxygen barrier properties. The authors concluded that the new active film is a potential sustainable food packaging material.[112]
Garlic extract Polyethylene, Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer and zein-Sliced pan loafThe new active film with garlic extract developed presented antifungal activity against Penicillium expansum. The active film successfully delayed fungal growth in the bread, compared to the control, during the 30 days of storage.[104]
Chitosan and rosemary extract Poly (lactic acid)Melt mixing-The incorporation of rosemary extract and chitosan on the PLA matrix resulted in a film packaging with improved elongation at break, mechanical strength, and thermal stability, as well as antibacterial and antioxidant properties. The authors concluded that this new film can be a potential active packaging with the controlled release of antimicrobial/antioxidant compounds.[102]
Carotenoids extracts
β-carotene and lycopene extracted from carrots and tomatoes and bixin extracted from annatto seeds
Poly (lactic acid)Casting methodSunflower oilThe incorporation of carotenoid extracts into PLA films successfully improved the shelf life of sunflower oil as it delayed its oxidation. Films with lycopene and β-carotene extracts exhibited better protection against UV light and oxygen barrier properties. Nonetheless, films with bixin extract demonstrated superior capacities in protecting sunflower oil with the best antioxidant properties.[113]
Silver nanoparticles from Nigella sativa seedcake extract ChitosanCasting method-The incorporation of silver nanoparticles improved the film’s mechanical properties; specifically, it improved the film’s tensile strength and elongation and reduced the water vapor permeability. The silver nanoparticles also enhanced the film with antibacterial properties.[114]
Rosemary extract Whey ProteinCasting methodSalamiThe whey protein film incorporated with rosemary extract was effective against the lipid oxidation of salami during 90 days at 5 °C. The active film was able to delay lipid oxidation of salami, as the samples presented lower values of MDA and hexanal in comparison with the control.[85]
Ginkgo biloba extractGelatinCasting method-The authors concluded that the incorporation of ginkgo biloba increased the films’ tensile strength and decreased their elongation at break, moisture content, solubility, and water vapor permeability. The extract also added to the film antioxidant properties and antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and Candida albicans.[115]
Salvadora persica L. extract and titanium dioxide nanoparticlesCarboxymethyl celluloseCasting method-The study concluded that the incorporation of Miswak (Salvadora persica L.) extract and titanium dioxide nanoparticles into a nanocomposite carboxymethyl cellulose film improved its properties, specifically the thermal stability, oxygen and water vapor permeability, and antimicrobial activity, namely against E. coli and S. aureus.[116]
Oregano essential oil, rosemary extract, and green tea extract Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Electrospinning-The addition of the active compounds to the film increased its opacity and decreased its hydrophobicity. The active compounds also conferred antioxidant and antimicrobial properties to the film.[117]
Extract from oregano waste Carbon dioxide-derived poly (propylene carbonate) and cellulose acetateCasting method-The new food packaging developed presented good mechanical, thermal, and water vapor barrier properties. The addition of oregano waste extract also improved the film’s antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. The authors also concluded that the film is biodegradable, posing as a candidate for a new sustainable active food packaging material.[118]
Rheum ribes L. Extract Methylcellulose polymerCasting method-The authors found that the addition of the extract increased the thickness and opacity of the film while decreasing solubility and water vapor permeability. In addition, it enhanced the tensile strength of the films but reduced their elongation at break. The active film presented increased antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity.[119]
Banana peel extract ChitosanCasting methodApple fruitThe chitosan film incorporated with banana peel extract presented increased thickness, opacity, and tensile strength but reduced elongation at break, solubility, and water vapor permeability. The addition of the extract also improved the film’s antioxidant properties. The active coating was applied to apples and demonstrated to increase their shelf life, as those apples presented lower respiration rates, weight loss, and soluble solid content, as well as higher firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content, compared to the control.[120]
Propolis extract Poly lactic acidCasting methodMeat sausageIncorporating propolis ethanolic extract into PLA films can increase the films’ thickness and opacity but decrease the tensile strength and elongation at break. When applied to sausage slices, the active film presented enhanced antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity.[121]
Aloe Vera skin extract Poly(ethylene oxide)Electrospinning technique-The new active film was evaluated by different assays that concluded that the aloe vera skin extract was successfully incorporated into the poly(ethylene oxide), obtaining a smooth, defect-free, non-woven, and self-standing film. The active film presented a slight reduction in the thermal stability but increased antioxidant activity.[122]
Aqueous rice straw extract Native potato starchMelt blending and compression molding techniques-The incorporation of rice straw extract significantly enhanced the films’ antioxidant activity, slightly modified the mechanical strength, and also improved the films’ barrier properties by reducing water vapor permeability. The authors concluded that the films could help protect food from moisture loss and oxidation, thus extending the shelf life of food products.[123]
Cocoa bean shell extract and zinc oxide nanoparticles Pectin-based filmsCasting method-Zinc oxide nanoparticles and cocoa bean shell extract addition to the pectin-based film improved the oxygen, thermal, and UV barrier properties of the films, with the oxygen barrier improved by 50% and the screen to UV radiation reaching 98%.[82]
Olive leaf extract CarrageenanCasting method Lamb meat The addition of the extract to the film led to increased opacity and altered mechanical strength but maintained adequate flexibility and barrier properties suitable for packaging applications. The film also presented antimicrobial activity against E. coli. The active film was able to preserve lamb meat under refrigeration, as it significantly inhibited microbial growth, helped stabilize the pH of the meat, prevented the oxidation of lipids and proteins, and improved the sensory attributes, given that it helped maintain the red color of the meat, reduce discoloration, and retain moisture, thereby preventing excessive drying and texture deterioration.[124]
Longan ( Dimocarpus longan ) peels Paper from rice straw fibersCasting method-The authors developed paper with adequate strength and flexibility to be used as packaging material with good moisture resistance and strong antimicrobial activity against both S. aureus and E. coli bacteria.[125]
Mangosteen peel extract and zinc oxide nanoparticles Soy protein isolate Casting method-The addition of the active compounds significantly improved the film’s mechanical properties, as an increased tensile strength and elongation at break was observed. In addition, the active film presented excellent UV-blocking properties. The active films exhibited notable antioxidant activity and effective antibacterial activity against common foodborne pathogens, including E. coli and S. aureus.[126]
Nervilia fordii extracts Poly (vinyl alcohol) and polyvinyl (pyrrolidone)Electrospinning technique Encapsulated fish oil The researchers were able to develop a film with uniform diameters and smooth surfaces. The addition of the extract enhanced the tensile strength and flexibility of the films and attributed a significant antioxidant capacity.[127]
Pineapple peel extract Poly (vinyl alcohol)–corn starchCasting method-The incorporation of the extract decreased the transparency and the tensile strength of the film but increased the elongation at break and the water vapor permeability. The active film presented improved thermal stability and significantly enhanced antioxidant activity.[128]
Chinese cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) extractWhey protein concentrate-Eastern European curd cheeseThe study demonstrated that the edible coating could efficiently prolong the shelf life of perishable curd cheese as it successfully inhibited microbial growth. Sensory evaluations (odor, taste, texture, appearance, and overall acceptability) indicated that the active coating did not negatively affect the cheese’s overall acceptability.[129]
Blueberry, red grape, and parsley by-product extractsChitosanCasting method-The addition of the extracts increased the water vapor transmission rate but decreased oxygen permeability. The swelling degree decreased with higher concentrations of extracts, indicating improved structural integrity. Both the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the films was enhanced by the incorporation of plant extracts.[130]
Red cabbage (Brassica oleracea), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), and blue tea (Clitoria ternatea) extractsCarrageenan and chitosanCasting methodFreshly cut apple piecesThe incorporation of different extracts into carrageenan-based films resulted in films with higher mechanical strength, total polyphenol content, and antioxidant activity. In addition, when applied to freshly cut apples, the films presented reduced browning intensity and improved antioxidant activity compared to the control.[131]
Beetroot peel extract Gelatin–sodium alginateCasting methodBeef meatThe study concluded that the inclusion of beetroot peel extract significantly improved the total phenolic content and consequently the antioxidant capacity. The active film was robust and flexible, demonstrating good tensile strength and elongation at break. In addition, the active film presented a reduction in water vapor permeability. The active film successfully increased the minced beef meat shelf life as it led to a reduction in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances values and inhibited microbial growth.[80]
Pitanga leaf hydroethanolic extract and/or nisinGelatin Mechanical spreading techniqueSliced dried-cured coppaThe authors concluded that the bi-layer active film effectively maintained the quality and sensory properties of the meat during storage. The active film reduced moisture loss, which maintained the texture and prevented excessive drying of the meat. The active film inhibited lipid oxidation and microbial growth during storage, extending the shelf life of the coppa slices. In addition, the active film helped retain the characteristic flavor and aroma of the coppa and maintain a more stable color profile during storage.[132]
Jaboticaba peel extractCarrageenan Casting method-The jaboticaba peel extract presented excellent antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. The incorporation of the extract into the carrageenan matrix increased the film’s thickness and Young’s modulus and decreased the elongation capacity, tensile strength, water vapor permeability, and swelling. Nonetheless, the extract improved the opacity of the film, giving it UV–vis light barrier properties.[133]
Watermelon rind extract Polyvinyl alcohol, corn starch, glycerolCasting method Freshly cut purple cabbage The addition of the watermelon rind extract to the composite film improved the barrier, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of the film. The active film was able to significantly reduce the microbial count of freshly cut purple cabbage, and it did not affect its sensory attributes.[84]
Peony leaf extractChitosanCasting methodApplesThe incorporation of peony leaf extract into chitosan film improved the film’s water vapor permeability, thermal stability, and opacity, but it negatively influenced the packaging appearance. Nonetheless, it presented as a good UV and light protector of the packed food. The active packaging was effective in retarding the natural browning process of fresh apples during storage.[87]
Date palm pit extractAlginateCasting method-The active film demonstrated significant antioxidant activity. The active film presented good oxygen and grease barrier properties and a glossy appearance, and it was water-soluble and tasteless. The incorporation of date palm pit extracts improved water vapor barrier properties, tensile strength, and elongation at break.[134]
Green tea extractLow-density polyethyleneExtrusion processFresh orange juiceThe study concluded that the active films with green tea extract were effective in extending the shelf life of fresh orange juice. The active packaging inhibited microbial, yeast, and mold growth for up to 14 days. The films decreased oxidation processes, with low levels of ascorbic acid degradation and the development of brown pigments, preventing the degradation of the juice’s quality over time.[135]
Carboxylated cellulose nanocrystal and beetroot extractSodium alginateExternal gelation methodFresh pork external fatThe active film presented improved mechanical and antioxidant properties. The active compound enhanced the ability to block UV light and functioned as a real-time freshness indicator by changing color when spoilage thresholds were exceeded during storage.[136]
Portulaca oleracea extractChitosan–starchCasting methodChilled pork meatThe developed active film presented excellent antioxidant capacity, good water barrier properties, and mechanical strength. The film was applied to chilled pork meat and was able to delay the lipid oxidation and meat spoilage; in addition, it protected the meat’s color during storage.[88]
Zanthoxylum bungeanum leaf extractSoy protein isolateCasting methodCherry tomatoesThe incorporation of the extract improved the films’ tensile strength, water barrier properties, UV-light blocking properties, and antioxidant activities. When applied to cherry tomatoes, the active film effectively maintained the quality of the tomatoes during storage, reducing weight loss and delaying spoilage compared to control.[137]
Ficus racemosa fruit extractChitosan and sodium alginateCasting method-The extract was successfully incorporated into the chitosan–sodium alginate matrix, originating a uniform and smooth surface and an improvement of the thermal stability of the films. The active films exhibited enhanced antioxidant activity with the incorporation of the F. racemosa extract.[138]
Olive pomace extractPoly lactic acid and polypropylene-Freshly cut Royal Gala applesThe natural extract reduced the growth of mesophilic bacteria and filamentous fungi for at least five days and inhibited the growth of coliforms for up to 12 days. The extract increased the antioxidant activity of the fruits without significant changes in their firmness and preserved their color after the initial browning of the samples.[139]
Viola odorata flower extract Potato starchCasting methodChicken filetsThe incorporation of the extract into the film improved its phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, and antibacterial efficacy against common foodborne pathogens, including E. coli, S. aureus, and Salmonella typhimurium. The active film presented good light-blocking activity, especially against UV waves and improved permeability to water vapor. The active films effectively inhibited lipid oxidation and microbial growth in the chicken filets, thereby extending their shelf life compared to control samples.[140]
Garlic extractChitosan–starch-Green and yellow bell peppersThe chitosan–starch garlic extract film demonstrated its potential as food packaging as it protected the bell peppers from bacterial growth and weight loss, protecting their general appearance during storage. [86]
Propolis extractLepidium sativum seed mucilage-Buffalo meatThe active coating developed exhibited significant antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. The active coating was able to reduce lipid oxidation and microbial growth in buffalo meat during storage. The active coating was also able to minimize weight and texture losses during display and enhance the overall acceptability of the meat.[141]
Forsythia flower extract Starch–montmorilloniteSolution flow delay methodCherry tomatoesThe authors concluded that the incorporation of the extract improved the film’s antioxidant and UV protection properties, as well as its thermal stability. When applied to fresh tomatoes, the active film preserved firmness, minimized nutrient loss, boosted vitamin C content, reduced decay rates, and consequently prolonged the tomatoes’ shelf life.[142]
Olive pomace, grape marc, and moringa leaves extracts Cellulose -Ground beefThe packaging material’s antioxidant qualities were significantly enhanced by the use of natural extracts, in addition to successfully decreased lipid peroxidation in food products. Additionally, over a 16-day period, the active packaging reduced lipid oxidation by at least 50% when applied to ground beef.[143]
Apricot kernel seed extract Chitosan Casting method-The authors concluded that the incorporation of apricot kernel seed extract into the chitosan matrix significantly improves its mechanical strength, thermal stability, and barrier properties. Additionally, the active films exhibit enhanced antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, which are crucial for extending the shelf life and ensuring the safety of packaged food products.[144]
Camellia sinensis leaf extract PectinCasting method-The addition of the extract to the pectin-based film significantly improved its antioxidant activity due to the high polyphenol content in green tea. The active films demonstrated improved water resistance, reducing the permeability of moisture and oxygen. However, a slight reduction in film strength was observed with higher extract concentrations, but the overall flexibility and integrity remained within an acceptable range.[145]
Eucalyptus citriodora leaf extract Chitosan/ polyvinylpyrrolidoneCasting method-The authors concluded that the incorporation of the extract into the films effectively inhibited microbial growth and improved the mechanical properties by making them more robust and durable. The extract improved the films’ tensile modulus, yield strength, and tension at the break.[146]
Blueberry anthocyanin extract Wheat gluten protein and apple pectinCasting method Shrimp The active film exhibited a uniform and compact structure after incorporation of the extract, effective water vapor permeability, and improved mechanical strength. The addition of the extract improved the antioxidant activity, which can help in delaying lipid oxidation in food products. When used to monitor shrimp spoilage, films changed color with volatile amine release, visually indicating freshness over 18 days.[147]
Hibiscus sabdariffa l. extract Potato starch and polyvinyl alcohol--The active film presented significant antioxidant capacity and antibacterial activity against common foodborne pathogens, including E. coli and S. aureus. The active film presented improved the tensile strength and flexibility and reduced water vapor permeability.[148]
Table 6. Studies with active packaging examples using individual compounds from essential oils or natural extracts as active components.
Table 6. Studies with active packaging examples using individual compounds from essential oils or natural extracts as active components.
CompoundPolymerPackaging Preparation MethodFood Matrix
(If Applied)
Main ResultsRef.
Cinnamaldehyde
(CIN)
Ethylene vinyl alcohol
(EVOH)
Solvent casting and melt extrusionNAThe study successfully developed bioactive EVOH films containing 1, 3, and 5% of cinnamaldehyde using a hybrid solvent-casting and melt-extrusion method. The films exhibited antioxidant activity, UV-blocking properties, and antifungal properties against Penicillium expansum. The incorporation of cinnamaldehyde also improved the films’ flexibility and transparency while maintaining their mechanical integrity, making them suitable for industrial-scale food packaging applications.[94]
Cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenolZein, polyethylene glycol (as a hydrophilic plasticizer), oleic acid (as a hydrophobic plasticizer)Solvent castingNAThe study successfully developed biodegradable zein-based films incorporated with cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenol with antimicrobial properties, with cinnamaldehyde showing the strongest activity, particularly against S. aureus for a period up to 96 h. However, while higher cinnamaldehyde concentrations improved film flexibility, they reduced tensile strength, with PEG proving more effective than OA as a plasticizer for enhancing mechanical properties. The results highlight the potential of these zein–PEG films containing 5% cinnamaldehyde as sustainable, antimicrobial packaging material.[95]
Thymol, eugenol, and cinnamaldehydePullulanLipid nanoparticle encapsulationNAThis study investigated the release kinetics of thymol, eugenol, and cinnamaldehyde from pullulan-based biodegradable films, comparing liquid-lipid nanoparticles and solid-lipid nanoparticles as carriers. The results showed that solid-lipid nanoparticles films provide a faster release of antimicrobials due to the expulsion of active compounds during lipid crystallization. Among the tested compounds, thymol exhibits the highest release rate.[149]
CinnamaldehydeChitosan and acidified montmorillonite (MMT)Solvent castingNAIn this study, chitosan-based films with acidified MMT loaded with cinnamaldehyde were developed and evaluated. The films exhibited improved mechanical strength, UV resistance, and prolonged cinnamaldehyde release (using isooctane as a fatty food simulant), along with significant inhibition of S. aureus and E. coli.[150]
Carvacrol, thymol, and cinnamaldehydeLow-density polyethylene (LDPE) and chitosanCocrystallization and Solvent castingWhite grapesThis study developed a cocrystal-based active packaging using carvacrol, thymol, and cinnamaldehyde anchored to a chitosan-coated LDPE. The active films showed antimicrobial activity against E. coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, S. aureus, and MR S. aureus. The films extended the shelf-life of white grapes by 7 days, maintaining their sensory quality.[151]
CinnamaldehydeChitin from shrimp and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)Solution casting methodCherry tomatoesActive packaging films by incorporating β-cyclodextrin/CIN inclusion complexes into chitin/PVA blends using a solution casting method. The films demonstrated a sustained release of CIN, enhanced antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, Bacillus subtilis, S. typhimurium, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Penicillium citrinum. The film with 3% β-cyclodextrin/CIN effectively preserved the cherry tomatoes by reducing weight loss, maintaining hardness, and inhibiting microbial growth over 10 days.[152]
CinnamaldehydeChitosan and dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose (DCMC)Solution casting methodStrawberriesActive packaging chitosan/DCMC-based films with zein nanoparticles loaded with CIN were successfully produced. The films exhibited improvements in mechanical strength, water vapor and oxygen barrier properties and UV-blocking ability. The film with 35% zein nanoparticles and CIN effectively preserved the strawberries by reducing microbial growth, weight loss, and maintaining quality over 7 days of storage.[153]
Thymol, carvacrol, limonene and cinnamaldehydePolylactic acid (PLA)Solvent-casting techniqueNAThis study developed a PLA-based active film incorporating thymol, carvacrol, limonene, or CIN using solvent casting. The films exhibited significant antioxidant activity, with carvacrol demonstrating superior performance compared to the other individual compounds and their triple blends. Regarding the films’ characteristics, the active films exhibited plasticization effects and maintained PLA’s crystallinity, with CIN slightly reducing thermal stability. [154]
ThymolPolycaprolactone (PCL)Solution blow spinningNAThymol was encapsulated in covalent organic frameworks and incorporated in PCL through solution blow spinning. The films exhibited controlled thymol release and antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli.[155]
ThymolLDPEMelt extrusion processFresh “scaloppini”-type pork meat filetsHalloysite nanotubes were impregnated with thymol to form a hybrid nanostructure. Then, this nanostructure was incorporated in LDPE at 5, 10, and 15%. The active films exhibit significant antioxidant activity and improved barrier properties. The LDPE with 10% of the thymol nanostructure optimally preserved pork meat by significantly reducing lipid oxidation. The research also established a linear correlation between TBARS and heme iron measurements, offering a faster method to assess meat spoilage.[156]
D-LimonenePVAElectrospinning, with additional ultrasonic processingNAPVA/D-limonene composite fibers, with the optimized ratio of 7:3 and an ultrasonic processing time of 15 min, were developed. The active composite fibers presented antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus and enhanced degradability and homogeneity due to ultrasonic treatment.[157]
D-LimoneneSodium alginatePhase inversion and brush-coated application Bananas (Musa sapientum Linn.)The study developed an edible coating using a sodium alginate D-limonene nanoemulsion, which demonstrated antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and E. coli, and effectively extended the shelf life of bananas by reducing weight loss and delaying ripening. The 1.0% D-limonene concentration was optimal, while higher concentrations caused undesirable visual effects.[158]
EugenolPoly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)ElectrospinningNAThe authors developed multilayer food packaging using electrospun PHBV fibers loaded with eugenol, which demonstrated antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. The optimized 15 wt.% eugenol–PHBV monolayer, exhibited enhanced barrier properties, hydrophobicity, and thermal stability.[159]
CatechinZein reinforced with cellulose nanocrystalsSolution castingSoybean oilAn antioxidant-active nanocomposite film using zein, catechin/β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles, and cellulose nanocrystals was created in this study. The active film exhibited enhanced mechanical strength, barrier properties, and oxidative stability. Also, the film effectively inhibited lipid oxidation in soybean oil, demonstrating potential for active food packaging applications.[160]
CatechinOctenyl succinic anhydride starch and PullulanElectrospinning and glutaraldehyde vapor phase crosslinkingStrawberriesIn this study, a starch-based nanofiber film was developed using electrospinning and glutaraldehyde crosslinking, incorporated with catechin. The active film presented antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli along with in vitro antioxidant activity. The active film successfully extended the strawberries’ shelf life, maintaining their freshness by 6 days. [161]
Linalool and thymolPolyethyleneDirect mixing and compression moldingMozzarella cheeseThe study developed antimicrobial polyethylene films infused with linalool or thymol, which significantly inhibited S. aureus and E. coli growth in mozzarella cheese, extending its shelf life. Thymol (2%) was most effective, preventing bacterial contamination and reducing mold/yeast proliferation. [162]
Thymol and carvacrolPLAMelt-processed by injection moldingBlackberries and raspberriesThis study evaluated a PLA packaging containing thymol or carvacrol complexed with β-cyclodextrins for preserving blackberries and raspberries during cold storage. The active packaging showed significant antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, improving fruit quality and extending shelf life by one week over commercial packaging. Sensory evaluation confirmed no negative impact on flavor or aroma, supporting the potential of these natural compounds for food preservation.[163]
Legend: CIN—cinnamaldehyde; NA—non-applicable; EVOH—ethylene vinyl alcohol; PEG—polyethylene glycol; MMT—montmorillonite; LDPE—low-density polyethylene; PVA—polyvinyl alcohol; DCMC—dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose; PLA—polylactic acid; PCL—Polycaprolactone; PHBV—poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrade, M.A.; Barbosa, C.H.; Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Tomé, S.; Fernando, A.L.; Silva, A.S.; Vilarinho, F. Emerging Trends in Active Packaging for Food: A Six-Year Review. Foods 2025, 14, 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152713

AMA Style

Andrade MA, Barbosa CH, Ribeiro-Santos R, Tomé S, Fernando AL, Silva AS, Vilarinho F. Emerging Trends in Active Packaging for Food: A Six-Year Review. Foods. 2025; 14(15):2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152713

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrade, Mariana A., Cássia H. Barbosa, Regiane Ribeiro-Santos, Sidney Tomé, Ana Luísa Fernando, Ana Sanches Silva, and Fernanda Vilarinho. 2025. "Emerging Trends in Active Packaging for Food: A Six-Year Review" Foods 14, no. 15: 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152713

APA Style

Andrade, M. A., Barbosa, C. H., Ribeiro-Santos, R., Tomé, S., Fernando, A. L., Silva, A. S., & Vilarinho, F. (2025). Emerging Trends in Active Packaging for Food: A Six-Year Review. Foods, 14(15), 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152713

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop