You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Foods
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

19 December 2023

Current State-of-the-Art Spectroscopic and Chromatographic Techniques Utilized in Food Authenticity and Food Traceability

and
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Current State-of-the-Art Spectroscopic and Chromatographic Techniques Utilized in Food Authenticity and Food Traceability
Food products are heterogeneous and complex matrices characterized by various compounds and in variable proportions. They can be of animal or vegetable origin and can come from different geographical areas, which can influence their composition. The globalization of supply chains, together with weak governance and the absence of standardized globally validated fraud prevention processes, increases the incidence of food irregularities.
Based on these considerations, the development of analytical methods to detect adulterations and verify the authenticity, geographical origin and traceability of foods is increasingly complicated.
Olive oil, fish, honey, milk and dairy products, meat, grain-based foods, wine, other alcoholic beverages and coffee are considered the matrices most at risk of fraud [1].
Nowadays, analytical approaches to food authentication and traceability are increasingly moving towards digital fingerprinting techniques. This Special Issue aims to fill the analytical gap in the search for food authenticity and to share new valid methods to control fraud in the food sector in order to protect consumers, food producers and the original product. Below are some examples of the most used techniques in this field.
Spectroscopic techniques, including vibrational near-infrared (NIR), mid-infrared (MIR), Raman, absorption ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) are frequently used in combination with chemometric approaches to study the authentication and traceability of food.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), traditionally used for structural elucidation, has been used to authenticate olive oil and coffee [2,3,4].
Significant progress in spectroscopic research for the authentication of seafood has unfolded, particularly for fish mislabelling and substitution, such us the discrimination between fresh thawed fish [5,6], using NIR and NMR [5,6,7] or substitution detection with UV-Vis [8].
Chromatographic techniques combined with different mass spectrometry (MS) technologies [9], including time of flight spectrometry (TOF), high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) [10], have been used extensively for food traceability and authentication, particularly for honey, wine, fish, coffee and rice [11,12,13].
Growing competition stemming from the globalization of markets calls for the development of highly innovative methods to test the authenticity and traceability of foods. This achievement would represent a milestone in ensuring label matching, detecting food fraud and avoiding scandals.

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, G.E.; supervision, G.E. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hong, E.; Lee, S.Y.; Jeong, J.Y.; Park, J.M.; Kim, B.H.; Kwon, K.; Chun, H.S. Modern analytical methods for the detection of food fraud and adulteration by food category. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 3877–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Consonni, R.; Ordoudi, S.A.; Cagliani, L.R.; Tsiangali, M.; Tsimidou, M.Z. On the Traceability of Commercial Saffron Samples Using ¹H-NMR and FT-IR Metabolomics. Molecules 2016, 21, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maestrello, V.; Solovyev, P.; Bontempo, L.; Mannina, L.; Camin, F. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in extra virgin olive oil authentication. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Toci, A.T.; de Moura Ribeiro, M.V.; de Toledo, P.R.A.B.; Boralle, N.; Pezza, H.R.; Pezza, L. Fingerprint and authenticity roasted coffees by 1H-NMR: The Brazilian coffee case. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sannia, M.; Serva, L.; Balzan, S.; Segato, S.; Novelli, E.; Fasolato, L. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy for frozen-thawed characterization of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4437–4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pennisi, F.; Giraudo, A.; Cavallini, N.; Esposito, G.; Merlo, G.; Geobaldo, F.; Acutis, P.L.; Pezzolato, M.; Savorani, F.; Bozzetta, E. Differentiation between Fresh and Thawed Cephalopods Using NIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Data Analysis. Foods 2021, 10, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aursand, M.; Veliyulin, E.; Standal, I.B.; Falch, E.; Aursand, I.G.; Erikson, U. Nuclear magnetic resonance. In Fishery Products, Quality, Safety and Authenticity; Rehbein, H., Oehlenschläger, J., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2009; Volume 1, pp. 252–266. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chai, Z.; Wang, C.; Bi, H. Rapid Identification between Two Fish Species Using UV-Vis Spectroscopy for Substitution Detection. Molecules 2021, 26, 6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Di Stefano, V.; Avellone, G.; Bongiorno, D.; Cunsolo, V.; Muccilli, V.; Sforza, S.; Dossena, A.; Drahos, L.; Vékey, K. Applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for food analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1259, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cabañero, A.I.; Recio, J.L.; Rupérez, M. Liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry: A new perspective on honey adulteration detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9719–9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tranchida, P.Q.; Purcaro, G.; Maimone, M.; Mondello, L. Impact of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with mass spectrometry on food analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dou, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, R.; Wang, X.; Yu, L.; Yue, X.; Ma, F.; Mao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; et al. Mass spectrometry in food authentication and origin traceability. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2023, 42, 1772–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Esposito, G.; Sciuto, S.; Guglielmetti, C.; Pastorino, P.; Ingravalle, F.; Ru, G.; Bozzetta, E.M.; Acutis, P.L. Discrimination between Wild and Farmed Sea Bass by Using New Spectrometry and Spectroscopy Methods. Foods 2022, 11, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.