Next Article in Journal
Effect of Decontamination and Cleaning on the Shear Bond Strength of High Translucency Zirconia
Next Article in Special Issue
PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Qualitative Evaluation of Clinical Audit in UK Dental Foundation Training
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Sulfur-Containing Primers for Noble Metals on the Bond Strength of Self-Cured Acrylic Resin
Article

Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns—Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups

1
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Technology, School of Dentistry, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 44, 58455 Witten, Germany
2
Private Practice, 50670 Köln, Germany
3
Department of Biological and Material Sciences in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 44, 58455 Witten, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2017, 5(4), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040030
Received: 28 August 2017 / Revised: 30 October 2017 / Accepted: 31 October 2017 / Published: 14 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Materials)
This pilot study evaluates the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia crowns after chairside polishing by different dental practitioner groups. Four practitioner groups (group I: dental clinical students (n = 6); group II: dentists < 2 years post-qualification experience (n = 6); group III: dentists > 2 years post-qualification experience (n = 6) and group IV: dental technicians (n = 6)) were asked to polish two CAD/CAM-fabricated full-contour zirconia crowns (48 in total). A two-step zirconia polishing kit was used in both trials. The first trial (T1) was conducted without a time limitation. In the second trial (T2), the polish was restricted to 15 seconds for each polisher. Two blinded investigators (I1 and I2) analyzed the surface roughness (Ra) before and after polishing (Alicona measuring system). No statistically significant difference in surface roughness was found between the polishing results of the dental practitioner groups. Major difference in surface finish was achieved by dental technicians, with a median value of 25.4 nm (interquartile range 10.15–35.26 nm) for I1 in T1. The lowest difference was achieved by dental students, with a median value of Ra = 6.72 nm (interquartile range 4.7–17.9 nm) in T1. In T2, experienced dentists showed the highest difference in surface finish, with a median value of 41.35 nm (interquartile range 7.77–54.11). No significant correlation was found between polishing time and polishing results. The polishing of monolithic zirconium dioxide crowns can be performed with the present polishing set directly chairside after occlusal adjustment, regardless of the practitioner’s experience level. View Full-Text
Keywords: dental materials; monolithic zirconia; abrasion; ceramic; polishing; surface roughness dental materials; monolithic zirconia; abrasion; ceramic; polishing; surface roughness
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kozmacs, C.; Hollmann, B.; Arnold, W.H.; Naumova, E.; Piwowarczyk, A. Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns—Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040030

AMA Style

Kozmacs C, Hollmann B, Arnold WH, Naumova E, Piwowarczyk A. Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns—Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups. Dentistry Journal. 2017; 5(4):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kozmacs, Carla, Britta Hollmann, Wolfgang H. Arnold, Ella Naumova, and Andree Piwowarczyk. 2017. "Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns—Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups" Dentistry Journal 5, no. 4: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040030

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop