Next Article in Journal
The Impact of a Postgraduate Learning Experience on the Confidence of General Dental Practitioners
Next Article in Special Issue
A Qualitative Evaluation of Clinical Audit in UK Dental Foundation Training
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Analysis of Velopharyngeal Movement by Applying Principal Component Analysis to Range Images Produced by a Three-Dimensional Endoscope
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Association between Postgraduate Studies, Gender and Qualifying Dental School for Graduates Qualifying from UK Dental Schools between 2000 and 2009
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Dent. J. 2017, 5(2), 15;

Should Undergraduate Lectures be Compulsory? The Views of Dental and Medical Students from a UK University

School of Oral & Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Claude Jaquiéry
Received: 31 December 2016 / Revised: 23 March 2017 / Accepted: 23 March 2017 / Published: 31 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2228 KB, uploaded 31 March 2017]   |  
  |   Review Reports


Formal lectures have been a traditional part of medical and dental education, but there is debate as to their compulsory status. This study was designed to explore dental and medical students’ views on compulsory lectures and the use of Video-Recorded Lectures (VRL). A cross-sectional study of University of Bristol students in Years 2 to 4 was conducted using an online questionnaire. The majority of both dental (76%) and medical (66%) students felt lectures should be non-compulsory. The most common learning resources used by both dental and medical students were live lectures, lecture handouts and VRL. The majority of both dental (84%) and medical (88%) students used VRL. Most students attended lectures all of the time both before and after the introduction of VRL, even though most dental and medical students believe lectures should be non-compulsory. VRL is a popular learning resource. These findings tie-in with General Dental Council and General Medical Council recommendations that encourage self-directed learning. Dental and Medical schools should offer a range of learning resources and make use of current technology, including the use of VRL. View Full-Text
Keywords: undergraduate; lecture; compulsory undergraduate; lecture; compulsory

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Daud, A.; Bagria, A.; Shah, K.; Puryer, J. Should Undergraduate Lectures be Compulsory? The Views of Dental and Medical Students from a UK University. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 15.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Dent. J. EISSN 2304-6767 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top