Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of icaADBC Genes, and Correlation with Biofilms and Antibiotic Resistance in S. aureus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Segmenting Attitudes Toward Vaccination—Behavioral Insights into Influenza Vaccination Refusal in Romania
 
 
GERMS is published by MDPI from Volume 15 Issue 4 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the former publisher Infection Science Forum.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Comparison of Microbial Preservation Methods: A Narrative Review

by
Wijesundara Mudiyanselage Thilini Nimansala Senaratne
and
Jayaweera Arachchige Asela Sampath Jayaweera
*
Department of Microbiology Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura 50008, Sri Lanka
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GERMS 2024, 14(4), 375-386; https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1447
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 23 December 2024 / Published: 31 December 2024

Abstract

Many microorganisms are used to produce antibiotics, vaccines, and medicines for various diseases, and preserving these microorganisms and viruses can ensure that the development process is streamlined. We have reviewed the short-term and long-term microbial and viral preservation methods including novel and emerging technologies. Short-term preservation methods of microorganisms are designed to maintain the viability of the organisms for periods ranging from a few days up to one year. The novel microfluid systems allow for the creation of microenvironments that support the growth and proliferation of specific microorganisms and the isolation of individual cells or small populations of microorganisms for studying microbial behavior and interactions. Long-term preservation involves storing the organisms for an extended period, ranging from months to decades, while retaining their viability and genetic stability. The mineral oil or liquid paraffin storage, storage in distilled water, storage in sterile soil, lyophilization, and cryopreservation are well known, and encapsulation of nanoparticles to preserve microorganisms, electrospinning, and electro spraying and supercooling are novel and emerging methods. Each short and long-term microbial and viral preservation method has advantages and disadvantages, and, based on the requirement, the appropriate method can be chosen.

Introduction

Bacteria, fungi, and viral agent preservation is maintaining microorganisms and viruses in a viable and stable state for an extended period [1]. It is always required to provide the specific environmental and nutritional requirements to maintain viability [2,3].
Many microorganisms are used to produce antibiotics, vaccines, and medicines for various diseases, and preserving these microorganisms and viruses can ensure that the development process is streamed and carried over. Preserved microorganisms and viruses play a critical role in agriculture, where they help to fix nitrogen in soil, decompose organic matter, and promote plant growth [2,4,5]. In clinical microbiology and research laboratories, preserving pathogens or isolates for future reference and analysis is important [5].
Different methods and techniques are used for preserving pathogens or isolates, and the choice of preservation method depends on various factors such as the type of microorganism, the intended duration of storage, and the intended future applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The studies and comprehensive reviews providing the most appropriate methods and the duration of preservation for each microbe and virus are scant. Also, comparative reviews with novel methods are less available.
Here, we have reviewed the short-term and long-term microbial and viral preservation methods and compared and contrasted the novel and emerging technologies with previous methods.

Microorganism and virus preservation methods

Microorganism preservation can be broadly divided into short-term and long-term preservation (Figure 1).
  • Short-preservation methods
Short-term preservation methods for microorganisms are designed to maintain their viability for periods ranging from a few days to one year.
  • 1.1. Refrigeration
Refrigeration involves storing the microorganisms at temperatures between 2-8°C, which can slow their metabolic rate, preventing or delaying their growth and prolonging their viability [3,4].
S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis are highly susceptible to low temperatures. The cold temperature negatively affects the metabolic processes, enzymatic reactions, and overall cellular functions required for the survival of the bacterium [7].
Influenza viruses, including seasonal influenza strains and the more well-known strains like H1N1 and H3N2, are highly labile and require specialized storage methods such as ultra-low temperature freezers or preservation in liquid nitrogen for long-term viability [3].
  • 1.2. Subculturing
Subculturing, which involves transferring a small amount of the original culture to a sterile and fresh medium, is another commonly used method for the short-term preservation of microorganisms [1,4]. Table 1 displays the turnover time and subculturing frequency of commonly used microbes.
  • Preservation of bacteria
Preservation can be challenging when working with fastidious bacteria with specific nutritional and environmental requirements [8,9]. Subculturing under antibiotic pressure can result in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant subpopulations due to random mutations or horizontal gene transfer. Additionally, subculturing without specific nutrients can adapt bacterial subpopulations that can utilize alternative resources. The genetic changes during subculturing can affect the expression or functionality of virulence factors in pathogens, resulting in subpopulations with different levels of pathogenicity [8].
  • Preservation of fungi
At 4°C, most filamentous fungi may survive for at least one to two years. Superficial fungi such as Malassezia furfur can be sub-cultured on Dixon's Agar or Leeming-Notman agar. They should be incubated at 30°C for 5 to 7 days to promote optimal growth. For dimorphic fungi such as Histoplasma capsulatum, subcultures are typically grown on Sabouraud-dextrose agar (SDA) at room temperature (25°C) for a period of 2 to 4 weeks [10].Dermatophytes, including Microsporum audouinii, are commonly sub-cultured on Sabouraud glucose agar at a temperature of 26°C. The cultures should be incubated for 2 to 4 weeks. Yeast species like Cryptococcus neoformans can be subcultured on SDA and incubated at 30°C for 48 to 72 hours [10]. Opportunistic fungi, such as Candida albicans, are sub-cultured on SDA and incubated at 30°C for 24 to 72 hours [11].
  • Preservation of viruses
Some common types of cultures used for virus preservation include cell cultures, embryonated eggs, animal models, insects, and artificial matrices. Cell cultures can be used for many types of viruses, including herpes simplex virus (HSV), cytomegalovirus, human papillomavirus, hepatitis B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Influenza virus is commonly preserved using embryonated eggs. Animal models can preserve rabies virus by maintaining it in animal models, such as mice or hamsters. Dengue virus and yellow fever virus can be preserved by maintaining them in mosquito hosts [1,12].
  • 1.3. Using glycerol
  • Preservation of bacteria
The viability of different organisms in glycerol can vary. E. coli and S. pneumoniae can remain viable for up to 5 months [4],while H. influenzae can remain viable for up to 4 months. On the other hand, N. meningitidis can remain viable for 6 weeks, and N. gonorrhoeae remains viable for 3 weeks. Listeria monocytogenes can be stored in 20% glycerol at -80°C [13].
  • Preservation of fungi
The concentration of glycerol used is typically between 10-20% v/v [14].Examples of fungi that can be preserved using glycerol are Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. [15].
  • Preservation of viruses
The higher glycerol concentration might have a virucidal effect because it dehydrates the viruses. Therefore, optimizing the glycerol concentration for each virus and cell type is important.
The RNA of the rabies virus was successfully preserved in 50% glycerol at -70°C for up to one year [16]. Glycerol is effective in preserving the viability of a wide range of viruses, including enveloped viruses, HSV-I, and non-enveloped viruses, poliovirus type 1 and the concentration of 85% glycerol appears to be preferred to preserve them because it does not affect the breakdown of extracellular DNA [12,13].
  • 1.4. Microfluidic system
Microfluidic systems allow for the creation of microenvironments that support the growth and proliferation of specific microorganisms and the isolation of individual cells or small populations of microorganisms for studying microbial behavior and interactions [17]. One example of a microfluidic system for microbial preservation is the microfluidic cell trap array, which uses microfabricated channels and traps to capture and preserve individual microorganisms. While microfluidic systems have the potential to provide more precise and efficient preservation methods compared to traditional techniques, more research is needed to optimize these systems and ensure their long-term viability for microbial preservation. Bacteria and fungi can be preserved using this technique, such as E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ranging from days to weeks or even longer [18].
Short-term preservation methods of microbes, with advantages and disadvantages, are displayed in Table 2.
2. 
Long-term preservation methods
Long-term preservation of microorganisms involves storing the organisms for an extended period, ranging from months to decades while retaining their viability and genetic stability.
  • 2.1. Mineral oil or liquid paraffin storage
The method involves the addition of mineral oil or liquid paraffin to the culture medium, covering the top layer of the medium and the microorganisms, forming a barrier between the organisms and oxygen. This creates an oxygen-free environment that prevents the growth and multiplication of microorganisms, preserving their viability for an extended period [16].
One of the most significant benefits is its ability to maintain the viability of microorganisms for months to years. When stored under mineral oils, pathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli and S. aureus, may lose virulence or pathogenicity over time [19].
  • Preservation of bacteria
Using this method, some bacterial genera, such as Bacillus spp., can be preserved for up to 8-12 years, and Mycobacterium spp. and Azotobacter spp. for 7-10 years [11,20].
However, it is important to note that preserving bacterial cultures using paraffin oil is not foolproof. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain a clean and sterile environment when working with bacterial cultures, regardless of the preservation method used [20].
  • Preservation of fungi
At room temperature or between 15° and 20°C, cultures can be stored even for a few years (2, 4 or, in extreme circumstances, up to 32 years). This approach is suitable for mycelial or nonsporulating fungi cultures that cannot be frozen or dried using freeze-drying technology. The main drawback of the method is that the fungi keep growing, which opens the possibility of selection for mutants [18].
A 10 mm layer of paraffin or oil covers fungi cultures grown on agar slants. Periodically check the oil level in the tubes, add additional oil if needed. Pleurotus spp., Aspergillus spp., Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and C. albicans can be preserved using the paraffin oil [18,21].
  • 2.2. Storage in distilled water
Sterile distilled water is a medium for the long-term preservation of microorganisms because it is sterile and free from any nutrients that might encourage the growth of the microorganisms. However, over time, the distilled water can become depleted of oxygen and nutrients, leading to a decline in the viability of the microorganisms [22].
  • Preservation of bacteria
The researchers found that bacteria could survive longer in water with a neutral pH (pH 7) compared to acidic or alkaline water. A wide range of bacteria can be stored, including P. fluorescens, Erwinia spp., Xanthomonas campestris, Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, S. aureus, Rhizobium spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Suspending the organisms before inoculation in a screw-capped tube containing phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.2 would be useful [8,11,21].
  • Preservation of fungi
The main concerns with this technique are using an appropriate volume of water to inoculum blocks, which should be at least 40 times more significant, and avoiding evaporative water loss from poorly sealed storage tubes by periodically adding sterile water to maintain the necessary water level. Fungi such as C. albicans, Cladosporium spp., Penicillium spp., Cephalosporium spp., A. niger, and A. fumigatus can be preserved [17,23].
  • 2.3. Storage in sterile soil
The method of preserving spore-forming bacteria and fungi by storing them in sterile soil is widely accepted. This method involves placing the microorganisms in a dormant state within the sterile soil. The soil is sterilized, and a spore suspension is added using aseptic techniques. Studies have shown that this method is highly effective in preserving the viability of spore-forming microorganisms, with some organisms remaining viable for up to 70-80 years [24].
  • Preservation of bacteria
This technique has been used to store some bacteria species that produce spores, particularly Clostridia. Additionally, it has been utilized to store bacilli and Azotobacter spp. non-sporulating bacteria that may not survive well in the lyophilization process can also be stored in soil using this method (E. coli). Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Rhizobium spp. can be preserved using this method [16,23].
  • Preservation of fungi
This low-maintenance and economical technique is suitable for Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Alternaria spp., Rhizopus spp., Septoria spp., Rhizoctonia spp., and Pseudocercosporella spp. Dryness-induced dormancy, however, might take time to develop, and morphological differences in some fungi can be observed [14,24].
  • 2.4. Storage in silica gel
Sterile silica gel is a widely used medium for storing bacteria and fungi. The process involves sterilizing screw-cap tubes partially filled with silica gel in an oven. After cooling, a skim-milk suspension containing spores and cells of the target microorganism is added over the silica gel and cooled again. The tubes are then dried at 25°C, followed by cooling, and stored in closed containers containing desiccants to prevent moisture absorption. Organisms can survive for 1-2 years [25].
  • Preservation of bacteria
P. denitrificans, E. coli, and Azotobacter vinelandii can be preserved using this silica gel method [12,16].
  • Preservation of fungi
Fusarium spp., S. cerevisiae, and A. nidulans can be stored [14,24,25]. Fungal spores stored on silica gel have the ability to remain viable for over ten years, making this method inexpensive, simple, and reliable for several fungi, including entomopathogens [14,24].
  • 2.5. Lyophilization
Lyophilization, also known as freeze-drying, can be divided into three steps: freezing, sublimation, and desorption [26]. It involves removing the water from the microorganisms by subjecting them to a vacuum and low temperature. This process helps to prevent damage caused by ice crystal formation and allows the microorganisms to be stored for long periods at room temperature [1,13,26].
  • Preservation of bacteria
Common ingredients used to maintain viability during lyophilization include mannitol, skim milk, and bovine serum albumin [27].Cryoprotectants, such as sucrose and trehalose, help preserve the biomolecules' structure during the process [28]. Typically, a basic freeze-drying solution is made using 20% skim milk and 5-10% sucrose. Probiotics, including Bifidobacteria, can be preserved using this freeze-drying method [28]. Certain bacteria, such as Clostridium botulinum, Aquaspirillum serpens, and Helicobacter pylori, cannot be preserved using lyophilization [1]. These bacteria have unique physiological and structural characteristics that make them particularly vulnerable to the stresses induced by lyophilization.
  • Preservation of fungi
The freeze-drying method suits coelomycetes, hyphomycetes, basidiomycetes, ascomycetes, and some thermophilic fungi such as Thermothelomyces spp. and Humicola spp. [29]. However, it is generally ineffective for fungi with large vacuolar volumes and contains a lot of water, such as some Oomycetes and Entomophthorales. It does not adequately preserve non-sporulating fungi (vegetative hyphae), and some species of yeast (Brettanomyces, Dekkera, Lipomyces, Leucosporidium Bulleera, Sporobolomyces) [1]. Store the lyophilized ampoules at approximately 4°C, although they can be kept at ambient temperature, if necessary, their viability will likely decline sooner than if refrigerated [13,17,29].
  • Preservation of viruses
This is the most satisfactory method of keeping viruses alive for a very long time. Depending on the unique design of the freeze-drying equipment, there are several changes in the technical procedures. The most straightforward and efficient method only requires one vacuum stage for small volumes of virus and small numbers of samples because the glass ampules are inserted directly onto the branching exhaust manifold of the freeze dryer [12].
  • 2.6. Cryopreservation
The preservation of biological materials at cryogenic temperatures, typically -80°C or -196°C, is referred to as cryopreservation (liquid nitrogen). Cryopreservation is useful for the long-term preservation of microorganisms that are difficult to culture or grow and those that are sensitive to low temperatures. Cryopreservation also requires cryoprotective agents to protect the microorganisms from damage caused by ice crystal formation during freezing. Low temperatures protect proteins and DNA from denaturation and damage while slowing cellular water movement. As a result, the biochemical and physiological activities of the cells are effectively halted, and the cells are protected for extended periods. Cell preservation at -20°C is not recommended to be used for long-term storage. A reservation at -80°C is adequate, but -196°C is ideal because it largely prevents DNA mutations from ocurring [22,30].
  • Preservation of bacteria
The bacterial cryopreservation protocol involves preparing the bacterial culture in a suitable medium, washing the cells, suspending them in a cryoprotective agent, and freezing them in small vials. The cryoprotective agent helps to protect the cells from damage during the freezing process [31].
To select the appropriate freezing medium, researchers should consider the growth requirements of the bacteria and the medium's composition. Additionally, they should take precautions to prevent contamination during the cryopreservation process, such as using sterile techniques and thoroughly cleaning equipment [27,28].
  • Preservation of fungi
In commercial cryopreservation systems, polystyrene beads can be used as carriers to cryopreserve sporulating A. fumigatus cultures at -80°C and conidia of entomopathogenic fungi. For S. cerevisiae cultures, porous ceramic beads can be employed at -70°C. This technique can be used to preserve fungi that are difficult to keep alive, such as unculturable, obligate parasites and mutualists such as. Halophythophthora, Saprolegnia, and Aphanomyces spp., as well as some Basidiomycota and Glomeromycota members [23,26].
  • Preservation of viruses
Viruses can be cryopreserved at -20°C to -70°C and in liquid nitrogen. Viruses can remain infectious at temperatures as low as -60°C, and to preserve their infectivity, it is best to rapidly freeze small volumes (0.1-0.5 mL) of virus suspension. However, if retaining infectivity is not necessary, the sample can be stored at -20°C for many years without losing its antigenicity, though infectivity may decrease. A useful method for preserving specific virus antigens for diagnostic purposes is to store acetone-fixed virus-infected cells on glass coverslips at -20°C for long-term storage. Baculoviruses or pox viruses can be preserved at -20°C. Virus-like particles, certain DNA viruses, and non-enveloped viruses can be kept stable at 4°C for an extended period. Because RNA and most encapsulated viruses are extremely heat-labile, long-term storage requires rapid freezing and storing at -80°C [15,26,32].
  • 2.7. Encapsulation
Encapsulation involves coating the microorganism with a protective layer to improve its stability and prevent loss of activity during storage and transportation. The protective layer can comprise various materials, such as alginate, gelatin, polyethylene glycol or polyvinyl alcohol [26,33].
The techniques used for immobilizing cells through encapsulation can be broadly categorized into two types depending on the size of the polymeric bead produced: macro-encapsulation and microencapsulation. Macroencapsulation involves trapping cells within polymeric beads ranging in size from a few millimeters to centimeters. Microencapsulation produces beads within the size range of 1-1000 µm. In the case of microencapsulation, it has been observed that the viability of cells at the center of larger beads tends to decrease over time [33].
Encapsulation can protect microorganisms from environmental stresses such as temperature, pH, and osmotic pressure, improving their stability during storage and transportation. However, the encapsulation process can reduce the microorganisms' activity, and the capsule may limit the diffusion of substrates and products in and out of the capsule, which can affect the performance of the biosensor.
Fluorescent dyes, such as SYTO-green, ethidium bromide, and 6-carboxyfluorescein, have been used to assess the viability of encapsulated cells. These dyes stain the nucleic acid of dead bacteria, allowing differentiation from live bacteria with intact cytoplasmic membranes.
Several types of microorganisms can be effectively encapsulated using different encapsulation techniques. Some bacteria suitable for encapsulation include Pantoea agglomerans, E. coli, B. subtilis, Pseudomonas spp., Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium spp. Yeast strains like Saccharomyces boulardii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Hirsutella rhossiliensis, an endoparasitic fungus, can also be encapsulated successfully. The shelf life of encapsulated viruses is highly dependent on the stability of the viral particles and the encapsulation method employed [15,26,33].
  • 2.8. Electrospinning and electrospraying
Electrospinning and electrospraying are emerging microencapsulation techniques used to preserve the viability of sensitive microorganisms. They involve atomization processes using an electrically charged jet of polymer solution to create nanoscale and microscale fibers or particles. These techniques have shown promise in food applications and as efficient methods for preserving microorganisms. A polymer solution containing microorganisms is placed in a syringe with a needle at the tip, and a high-voltage electric field is applied, which causes the polymer solution to form a charged jet that is pulled toward a collector, forming nanofibers. The microorganisms become encapsulated within these fibers, which act as protective carriers during storage. The electrospraying electric field causes the solution to break into fine droplets, forming nanoparticles or microcapsules that can protect the microorganisms [34].
Both electrospinning and electrospraying provide high surface area-to-volume ratios and high permeability, making them practical for preserving microorganisms. The thin polymeric fibers produced in electrospinning processes allow the trapped cells to exchange nutrients and metabolites while maintaining their metabolic activity [34,35].Electrospinning has been successfully used to encapsulate bifidobacterial strains, maintaining high microbial viability despite osmotic changes and electrostatic fields.
Electrospraying involves atomizing a liquid flow into droplets and has also been used to encapsulate probiotic strains onto protein-based or polysaccharide-based matrices. Microencapsulation through electrospraying with whey protein concentrate can prolong bifidobacterial cells survival, even under conditions of high humidity [34,35,36].
  • 2.9. Nanoparticles to preserve microorganisms
Nanoparticles are tiny particles with diameters in the range of 1-100 nanometers. They have unique physicochemical properties, including a high surface area-to-volume ratio, which can make them effective at preserving microorganisms. Using nanoparticles for microbial preservation can involve coating the microorganisms with a layer of nanoparticles, which can protect them from environmental stresses such as high or low temperatures, radiation, or oxidative stress. The nanoparticles can also act as a slow-release vehicle for antimicrobial compounds or other chemicals that can help maintain the viability of the microorganisms during storage [36,37].
  • 2.10. Supercooling
Supercooling is a method of cooling liquids or solutions below their freezing point without forming ice crystals [38,39]. By avoiding the formation of ice crystals, supercooling can help preserve the viability of microorganisms that might otherwise be damaged by freezing. In one approach to using supercooling for microbial preservation, microorganisms are suspended in a solution containing cryoprotective agents (such as glycerol or DMSO) and then supercooled to temperatures below their freezing point. The supercooled suspension can then be stored at low temperatures, such as -80°C, without forming ice crystals, which can help maintain the microorganisms' viability. Long-term preservation methods with advantages and disadvantages are displayed in Table 3.
Table 4 compares short-term and long-term microbial and viral preservation methods in terms of microbial growth, viability, maintenance, and equipment.
3. 
Assessing the viability of preserved microbes, including viruses
Following the preservation of microbes and different viruses, their viability is assessed using different methods. Microscopic examination using vital stains: Cells are observed microscopically in a counting chamber after staining with vital stains. Vital stains can distinguish between live and dead cells based on specific staining patterns. Nowadays, molecular techniques such as PCR (polymerase chain reaction) or QPCR (quantitative PCR/real-time PCR) can detect specific genetic markers to determine the presence or absence of viable microorganisms [24,25,26,27,35].

Discussion

Compared to traditional short-term microbial preservation methods, a microfluidic system has several advantages. It has high precision and control over the storage environment and is able to store small quantities efficiently, ideal for research and diagnostic purposes. Also, it offers a miniaturized, cost-effective alternative to large-scale storage. Limitations include the fact that the equipment would be expensive for large-scale applications, and the technique is still under development for widespread use [18,19,20,21].
The long-term microbial preservation methods can be applied to preserve the microbes and viruses for short time periods as well. Compared to cryopreservation, the novel vitrification is an advanced form of cryopreservation that avoids ice formation by turning the cell suspension into a glass-like state. This method is increasingly used in preserving cells and microbial strains without ice damage. Further, ultra-low temperature storage, below -130°C, using liquid nitrogen or specialized freezers also represents a more refined approach to freezing, maintaining better long-term viability for bacteria [28,29,30,31,32,33,40].
Similarly, improved lyophilization techniques have emerged, such as adding specific stabilizers or optimizing the freeze-drying cycle, which can improve the preservation of microbial properties. The flash freezing followed by immediate freeze-drying in highly controlled conditions helps to reduce the damage and enhance the storage of sensitive microorganisms. A low maintenance cost and an easy transportation of lyophilized cultures are the main advantages [35,40].
Compared to traditional chemical preservation such as mineral oil or liquid paraffin storage, storage in silica gel and in sterile soil, encapsulation in biocompatible matrices such as alginate beads or silica gel has become a more refined alternative to simple chemical preservatives. This can protect microbes during storage and offer better control over release and activity [21,37].
The novel electrospinning and electrospraying techniques have several advantages over traditional preservation methods. They do not require temperature control, avoiding detrimental effects on microbial physiology. The polymer fibers provide a physical barrier, reducing exposure to environmental stressors such as drying, UV radiation, or osmotic stress. Electrospun fibers can be designed to gradually release the microorganisms when required, making them useful for controlled delivery applications, such as probiotics or bioremediation [3,4,5,6]. Materials used in electrospinning, like polysaccharides, proteins, and biodegradable polymers (chitosan, alginate), are biocompatible, making them ideal for preserving microbial cultures. Potential uses include preservation of probiotics, bioremediation and vaccine development. However, the process of electrospinning can be technically complex and requires specialized equipment. And scaling the process for large quantities of microorganisms can be difficult. Some polymers used in electrospinning may not be suitable for all microorganisms or viruses, especially if they exhibit toxicity or inhibitory effects. Some microorganisms may lose viability during the drying or encapsulation process, especially if the polymers used are not optimized for preservation [24,25,35,36,37].
Supercoiling has several advantages over traditional preservation methods. It prevents ice crystal formation and minimize the mechanical and osmotic stresses that often occur with freezing. And compared to cryopreservation, supercooling can be done at slightly lower temperatures, around 0°C making it potentially more energy-efficient. It is used to preserve viruses as well. However, maintaining the stable and precise temperature control is challenging. It can be used to preserve Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, E. coli, Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and bacteriophages [16,23,29,31].

Conclusions

Microfluid systems, nanoparticles, electrospinning, electrospraying, and supercooling methods are available for novel and emerging microbial and viral preservation methods.
Each short- and long-term microbial and viral preservation method has advantages and disadvantages. Based on requirements, availability, and affordability, researchers and industry can select and use the appropriate preservation method.

Author Contributions

JAASJ conceptualized the review. TS drafted the manuscript with an initial literature review. Both authors reviewed the search articles, and JAASJ critically reviewed them. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

None to declare.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors – none to declare.

References

  1. Prakash, O.; Nimonkar, Y.; Desai, D. A recent overview of microbes and microbiome preservation. Indian J Microbiol. 2020, 60, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prakash, O.; Nimonkar, Y.; Shouche, Y.S. Practice and prospects of microbial preservation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013, 339, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Manjana, A.; Banjana, A.; Arijitmajumdar, D.; Nikhil Tudu, J. Selection of storage methods for maintenance of different stock cultures. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2016, 5, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lalaymia, I.; Cranenbrouck, S.; Draye, X.; Declerck, S. Preservation at ultra-low temperature of in vitro cultured arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi via encapsulation-drying. Fungal Biol. 2012, 116, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Malik, D.J. Bacteriophage encapsulation using spray drying for phage therapy. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021, 40, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Celik, O.F.; O'Sullivan, D.J. Factors influencing the stability of freeze-dried stress-resilient and stress-sensitive strains of bifidobacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 3506–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Júnior, L.L.Z.; Lopes, A.D.; Cordeiro, F.A.; et al. Cryopreservation at −75°C of Agaricus subrufescens on wheat grains with sucrose. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2018, 49, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hartsell, S.E. Maintenance of cultures under paraffin oil. Appl Microbiol. 1956, 4, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yahav, S.; Berkovich, Z.; Ostrov, I.; Reifen, R.; Shemesh, M. Encapsulation of beneficial probiotic bacteria in extracellular matrix from biofilm-forming Bacillus subtilis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018, 46 Suppl. 2, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guimarães, L.C.; Fernandes, A.P.; Chalfoun, S.M.; Batista, L.R. Methods to preserve potentially toxigenic fungi. Braz J Microbiol. 2014, 45, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deshmukh, S.K. The maintenance and preservation of keratinophilic fungi and related dermatophytes. Mycoses. 2003, 46, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Liao, Q.; Chen, T.; et al. Freeze-drying formulations increased the adenovirus and poxvirus vaccine storage times and antigen stabilities. Virol Sin. 2021, 36, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones, G.S.; D'Orazio, S.E.F. Listeria monocytogenes: cultivation and laboratory maintenance. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2013, 31, 9B.2–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/hcp/laboratories/preserving-yeast-and-mold-isolates-1.html (accessed on 15 August 2024).
  15. Paul, J.S.; Tiwari, K.L.; Jadhav, S.K. Long term preservation of commercial important fungi in glycerol at 4°C. Int J Biol Chem. 2015, 9, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aguilar-Setién, A.; Aguila-Tecuatl, H.; Tesoro-Cruz, E.; Ramos-Ramírez, L.; Kretschmer, R.S. Preservation of rabies virus RNA from brain tissue using glycerine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Richter, F.; Bindschedler, S.; Calonne-Salmon, M.; Declerck, S.; Junier, P.; Stanley, C.E. Fungi-on-a-Chip: microfluidic platforms for single-cell studies on fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022, 46, fuac039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Burmeister, A.; Grünberger, A. Microfluidic cultivation and analysis tools for interaction studies of microbial co-cultures. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020, 62, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hartsell, S.E. The longevity of bacterial cultures under paraffin oil. J Bacteriol. 1947, 53, 801. [Google Scholar]
  20. Quintero Moreno, B.; Araque, M.; Mendoza, E. Evaluation of two supplemented culture media for long-term, room-temperature preservation of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. Biomed Res Int. 2017, 2017, 1218798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miyamoto-Shinohara, Y.; Imaizumi, T.; Sukenobe, J.; Murakami, Y.; Kawamura, S.; Komatsu, Y. Survival rate of microbes after freeze-drying and long-term storage. Cryobiology. 2000, 41, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Criste, A.; Giuburuncă, M.; Negrea, O.; Dan, S.; Zăhan, M. Research concerning use of long-term preservation techniques for microorganisms. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014, 47, 47. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sette, L.D.; Pagnocca, F.C.; Rodrigues, A. Microbial culture collections as pillars for promoting fungal diversity, conservation and exploitation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013, 60, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Methods of cryopreservation in fungi. In Laboratory protocols in fungal biology; Fungal biology; Gupta, V., Tuohy, M., Ayyachamy, M., Turner, K., O’Donovan, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, 2013; pp. 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nagrale, D.T.; Gawande, S.P. Archaea: ecology, application, and conservation. In Microbial Resource Conservation; Soil Biology; Sharma, S.K., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, 2018; Volume 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, G.; Luo, L.; Dong, C.; et al. Polysaccharides can improve the survival of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subjected to freeze-drying. J Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 2606–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Missiakas, D.M.; Schneewind, O. Growth and laboratory maintenance of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2013, 28, 9C.1.1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jena, S.; Krishna Kumar, N.S.; Aksan, A.; Suryanarayanan, R. Stability of lyophilized albumin formulations: role of excipient crystallinity and molecular mobility. Int J Pharm. 2019, 569, 118568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Berikten, D. Survival of thermophilic fungi in various preservation methods: a comparative study. Cryobiology. 2021, 101, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Puchkov, E. Preservation of viable microorganisms in the laboratory: an overview of basics, methods and practical recommendations for beginners. Austin J Biotechnol Bioeng. 2023, 10, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Modern tools and techniques to understand microbes; Varma, A., Sharma, A.K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, 2017; pp. 1–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tan, D.T.; Poh, P.E.; Chin, S.K. Microorganism preservation by convective air-drying – a review. Dry Technol. 2018, 36, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Misra, S.; Pandey, P.; Dalbhagat, C.G.; Mishra, H.N. Emerging technologies and coating materials for improved probiotication in food products: a review. Food Bioproc Tech. 2022, 15, 998–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Low, S.X.Z.; Aw, Z.Q.; Loo, B.Z.L.; et al. Viability of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 in nutrient broth, Luria-Bertani broth and brain heart infusion over 11 weeks. Electron physician. 2013, 5, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rathore, S.; Desai, P.M.; Liew, C.V.; Chan, L.W.; Heng, P.W.S. Microencapsulation of microbial cells. J Food Eng. 2013, 116, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Merabishvili, M.; Vervaet, C.; Pirnay, J.P.; et al. Stability of Staphylococcus aureus phage ISP after freeze-drying (lyophilization). PLoS One. 2013, 8, e68797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, B.; Yu, J.; Sun, Y.; et al. Microfluidics for the rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using antibody-coated microspheres. Bioengineered. 2021, 12, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. You, Y.; Li, M.; Kang, T.; et al. Application of supercooling for the enhanced shelf life of Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Foods. 2021, 10, 2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. You, Y.; Kang, T.; Jun, S. Control of ice nucleation for subzero food preservation. Food Eng Rev. 2021, 13, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bircher, L.; Geirnaert, A.; Hammes, F.; Lacroix, C.; Schwab, C. Effect of cryopreservation and lyophilization on viability and growth of strict anaerobic human gut microbes. Microb Biotechnol. 2018, 11, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Microorganisms and viruses short- and long-term preservation methods. 
Figure 1. Microorganisms and viruses short- and long-term preservation methods. 
Germs 14 00375 g001
Table 1. Turnover time and subculturing frequency of commonly used microbes. 
Table 1. Turnover time and subculturing frequency of commonly used microbes. 
Germs 14 00375 i001
Table 2. Short-term preservation methods of microbes with advantages and disadvantages. 
Table 2. Short-term preservation methods of microbes with advantages and disadvantages. 
Germs 14 00375 i002
Table 3. Long-term preservation methods with advantages and disadvantages. 
Table 3. Long-term preservation methods with advantages and disadvantages. 
Germs 14 00375 i003
Table 4. Comparison between long-term and short-term preservation methods. 
Table 4. Comparison between long-term and short-term preservation methods. 
Germs 14 00375 i004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Senaratne, W.M.T.N.; Jayaweera, J.A.A.S. Comparison of Microbial Preservation Methods: A Narrative Review. GERMS 2024, 14, 375-386. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1447

AMA Style

Senaratne WMTN, Jayaweera JAAS. Comparison of Microbial Preservation Methods: A Narrative Review. GERMS. 2024; 14(4):375-386. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Senaratne, Wijesundara Mudiyanselage Thilini Nimansala, and Jayaweera Arachchige Asela Sampath Jayaweera. 2024. "Comparison of Microbial Preservation Methods: A Narrative Review" GERMS 14, no. 4: 375-386. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1447

APA Style

Senaratne, W. M. T. N., & Jayaweera, J. A. A. S. (2024). Comparison of Microbial Preservation Methods: A Narrative Review. GERMS, 14(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2024.1447

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop