Next Article in Journal
Development of an Adaptive Model for the Rate of Steel Corrosion in a Recirculating Water System
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Correlations between Spectroscopic and Morphological Properties of Activated Carbons from Waste Coffee Grounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonically Induced Polymerization and Polymer Grafting in the Presence of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of a Novel CO2-Responsive Polymer/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composite

1
College of Pharmacy, Taizhou Polytechnic College, Taizhou 225399, China
2
Center for Electron Microscopy and Tianjian Key Lab for Advanced Functional Porous Materials, Institute for New Energy Materials & Low-Carbon Technologies, School of Material Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(9), 1638; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091638
Submission received: 3 July 2021 / Revised: 18 August 2021 / Accepted: 8 September 2021 / Published: 11 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymerization Technologies in the Presence of Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
A CO2-responsive composite of multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) coated with polydopamine (PDA) and polydimethylamino-ethyl methacrylate (PDMAEMA) was prepared. The PDA was first self-polymerized on the surface of carbon nanotube. 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BiBB) was then immobilized by PDA and then initiated the ATRP of DMAEMA on the carbon nanotube surface. The resulting composite was characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The CO2-responsive test was performed by bubbling CO2 into the mixture of MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composite in water. A well-dispersed solution was obtained and the UV-Vis transmittance decreased dramatically. This is attributed to the reaction between PDMAEMA and CO2. The formation of ammonium bicarbonates on the surface of carbon nanotubes leads to the separation of nanotube bundles. This process can be reversed as the removal of CO2 by bubbling N2.

1. Introduction

Switchable systems are of great interest for green chemistry research and triggers such as temperature, light, voltage, acids, bases, oxidants or reductants are limited by their cost and environmental concern [1]. CO2, however, is abundant, inexpensive, stable and non-toxic to the reaction materials, which makes it an appropriate trigger for switchable systems [2]. The first switchable-polarity solvent (SPS) was prepared by Jessop and coworkers, using amidine/alcohol or guanidine/alcohol mixtures [3]. The polarity of the solvent is switched from low polarity to high polarity upon CO2 gas passing through and the polarity is reversed by removing CO2. The proposed mechanism is the reaction of CO2 with alcohol and amidine, which results in the formation of ionic liquids. After this, a variety of different SPS systems have been developed for the application of reaction media [4,5], extraction media [6,7], CO2 detection [8], and CO2 capture [9,10,11,12,13,14]. A series of switchable hydrophilicity solvents (SHS) have been prepared to avoid the distillation of volatile solvents [15,16]. In addition, scientists have also developed switchable surfactants, solutes, as well as catalysts for different applications [17,18,19].
Another category of switchable system is CO2-responsive polymers. One of the earliest applications of CO2 was to recover solid from a pH responsive latex in 1986 [20]. Most of the polymers have switchable functional groups such as tertiary amine, amidine, guanidine, imidazole, or carboxylic acid, which are capable of changing from neutral to cationic, anionic, or carbamate salts [2]. However, the synthesis condition is strict and the amidine-containing polymers are inherently hydrolytically unstable [21]. Instead of functionalizing the polymer itself, Han et al. proposed a more general strategy to incorporate an amine-containing monomer such as N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) into non-CO2-responsive, thermosensitive polymers [22]. The resulting copolymer consequently shows a CO2-switchable lower critical solution temperature (LCST). The switchable LCST makes it possible to design different smart materials with reversible structure triggered by CO2 [23,24,25,26].
Since the synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [27], scientists have found a wide range of applications for this interesting material, such as optoelectronic devices, biomedical systems, and polymer nanocomposites [28,29,30,31,32]. However, the weak non-covalent interaction between CNTs and polymer matrix has limited the development of novel composites [33,34]. The discovery of polydopamine (PDA), inspired by mussel in nature, has provided an ideal candidate for CNT surface modification [35]. The self-polymerized PDA is able to adhere on most solid surfaces and react with thiol or amine functional groups, hence allowing the formation of a variety of copolymers/CNTs composites [35,36,37,38]. In this study, we report the preparation of a CO2-responsive composite, which is multiwall carbon nanotubes coated with PDA and polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (PDMAEMA).

2. Materials and Methods

The following materials were used in this study: multiwall carbon nanotubes, from Nanjing Jicang Nano Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjin, China); dopamine hydrochloride, 98%, Cupric chloride, 99%, N,N,N’,N’’,N’’-Pentamethyldiethylenetriamine, 99%, Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, hydrochloric acid, L-ascorbic acid, dimethylformamide (DMF, analytical reagent), and triethylamine (analytical reagent) from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); 2-Bromoisobutyryl bromide (BiBB), 98%, and 2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, 99%, from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Purified water is supplied by Watsons.
Preparation of MWCNT-PDA: To a 200 mL Tris buffer solution (25 mM), pH = 8.5, 0.4 g dopamine hydrochloride and 0.2 g carbon nanotubes were added with magnetic stirring. The reaction was kept in 25 °C water bath for 24 h then the product was washed with ethanol 3 times and separated by centrifugation. The product was stored in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h. The MWCNT-PDA were obtained as a black powder.
Preparation of MWCNT-PDA-BiBB: An amount of 20 mg MWCNT-PDA powder was dispersed in 20 mL DMF with 10 min of ultra-sonication. Then, under N2 protection and magnetic stirring, 1 mL triethylamine (7.2 mmol) was added dropwise. After 10 min, a pre-mixed solution of 0.9 mL BiBB (7.2 mmol) in 10 mL DMF, was added by a constant pressure funnel. The reaction was stirred under continuous N2 presence for 24 h at 25 °C. The mixture was repeatedly washed with acetone, ethanol and water, respectively. Then, the product (MWCNT-PDA-BiBB) was placed in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h.
Preparation of MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA: To a three-neck flask and under N2 protection, MWCNT-PDA-BiBB (20 mg), DMAEMA (7.85 g, 0.05 mol), CuCl2 (0.13 g, 0.05 mol), pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (0.173 g, 0.001 mol), and L-ascorbic acid (0.35226 g, 0.002 mol) were added. Then, the temperature was raised to 60 °C and the reaction was kept under N2 protection for 24 h. After the reaction was completed, the product was collected and successively washed with CH2Cl2, ethanol and water. The MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA products were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h.
Characterization: Room-temperature infrared spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1S Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer. Typically, 20 scans were added at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The TEM characterization was performed with FEI-Talos F200x at 200 kV. Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer was used to measure the transmittance of composite and water mixture.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 of the as-received MWCNT, MWCNT-PDA, MWCNT-PDA-BiBB, and MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA. The MWCNTs have a series of characteristic absorption peaks. The peaks around 3440 cm−1 and 3135 cm−1 are from OH stretching, which may be related to presence of water or the carboxylic acid group in the tubes. The resolved OH peaks are ascribed to the hydrogen bonding and has been observed for different type of MWCNTs [39]. The 1640 cm−1 absorption is from the C=O stretching, which indicates the –COOH in the carbon tubes. The carboxylic acid group is most likely from the acid oxidation processing of the carbon nanotubes. The broad absorption around 1100 cm−1 is attributed to C–O–C stretching vibration and the 1400 cm−1 peak is due to the –CH3 symmetrical angular deformation. There is almost no difference in infrared absorption between MWCNT and MWCNT-PDA. This is probably due to the thin polydopamine film, about 2–3 nm (from TEM results), whereas the penetration depth of IR is in the micrometer range. Therefore, the spectra of MWCNT-PDA is mostly from the bulk carbon nanotube. The immobilization of BiBB was confirmed by the absorption peak at 680 cm−1, which is due to the stretching vibration of C–Br in 2-bromo-propionyl groups. After the ATRP reaction, the spectra of the resulting composite show no absorption of carbon bromine bond, suggesting the successful grafting of PDMAEMA on the surface of PDA.
The characteristic structure of multiwall carbon nanotubes is observed in Figure 2. The carbon tube has a diameter about 10 nm, and the multiwall extends an additional 5 nm, which provides additional mechanic strength compared to single-walled nanotubes. As shown in Figure 2a, the thin layer, about 2–3 nm on the surface is the PDA, and the walls of nanotubes are intact after the polymer deposition. The thin coating on the surface nanotube thus explains the similarity of IR absorption between MWCNT and MWCNT-PDA. However, the small amount of PDA modification of the MWCNT reacts with BiBB and provides polymerization sites for DMAEMA [40]. The presence of additional material on the surface of MWCNT is confirmed by Figure 2b, showing the thickness of a coating layer about 10 nm. In addition, the MWCNT flakes have low density and float on the surface of water. After coating of PDA, the MWCNT-PDA is still lighter than water; however, the MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composites precipitate and settle to the bottom. To verify the polymerization of truly PDMAEMA, we carry out the CO2-responsive test of this composite.
The multiwall carbon nanotubes tend to aggregate, as indicated in Figure 3. This is due to their strong van der Waals interaction and high aspect ratio. Consequently, the resulting composite is precipitated in water, as shown in Figure 4 inset. However, after bubbling CO2 to the mixture for 5 min, as indicated in Figure 4b, the surface modified MWCNTs turn into well-dispersed in water. This can be explained that the reaction between the PDMAEMA and CO2. The composite becomes hydrophilic as the formation of ammonium bicarbonates. The grafted polymers on the surface of MWCNTs are now positively charged. Therefore, the electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance leads to the separation of MWCNT aggregates into single tubes [41]. Figure 4 shows the UV-Vis of the solution before and after the introduction of CO2. Since the MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composite is not dispersed in water, the mixture exhibits hardly any absorption, similar to the absorption of water. However, the bubbling of CO2 leads to the formation of polar compounds and the dispersion of the composite dramatically decreases the transmittance of light; this is due to the dark appearance of the carbon nanotubes.
To check the reversibility of the composite with CO2, N2 gas was then bubbled into the solution for 10 min. The MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composite precipitated out again and changed back to the original state. The removal of CO2 by N2, reverses the reaction back to the neutral state of PDMAEMA. This results in the increase in the polymer chain interaction and the MWCNTs bundles again, eventually precipitates out of the solution. We propose Scheme 1 for the reversible reaction of the composite with CO2 based on the above observations. This CO2/N2 purge process was repeated six times and the corresponding UV-Vis spectra were recorded. Using the absorption at 610 nm as an indicator, the cycling results are shown in Figure 5a. This CO2-responsive process renders the composite a potential candidate for many smart material applications. Since the MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composite is responsive to CO2, it is intuitive to think that this material can be used as a CO2 detector. Again, we measure the UV absorption of the mixture against CO2 bubbling time at a fixed flow rate. As shown in Figure 5b, the UV-Vis spectra at 610 nm, the transmittance decrease in the solution has a good correlation as the CO2 gas reacts with the PDMAEMA in 10 min. After that, when the reaction is complete, the transmittance no longer changes and the curve remains flat. These results show the high sensitivity of composite to the small CO2 stream, which makes it a possible candidate for detecting the presence of CO2 in aqueous solutions.

4. Conclusions

MWCNTs provide unique mechanical and electrical properties and have a variety of applications for nanotechnology and material science. In this study, a novel CO2-responsive composite was prepared by surface modification of MWCNT. The PDA is coated on the surface of MWCNT due to the presence of highly reactive catechol and amine groups. The large amount of unsaturated active valents of PDA immobilize the BiBB, which initiates the ATRP synthesis of PDMAEMA. The resulting MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA composite reversibly reacts with CO2. The forward reaction forms polar ammonium bicarbonate in water, leading to the positive charge accumulation on the surface of MWCNTs. The electrostatic repulsion causes the separation of the carbon nanotube bundle and the composite becomes well dispersed. By bubbling N2 to remove CO2 from the solution, the reverse reaction changes the composite back to the original state and precipitates out. This makes the composite a potential candidate for CO2-responsive smart material application. In addition, the sensitivity of the MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA may also be used as a CO2 detector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.M. and D.H.; methodology, X.C., W.L. and Z.Z.; writing–original draft preparation, Y.M.; writing–review and editing, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Innovative Research Team of Taizhou Polytechnic College (No. TZYTD-16-4) and the Excellent Young Teachers of Jiangsu Blue Project, from Taizhou Science and Technology Support Program (Project TN202012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the main text of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jessop, P.G.; Mercer, S.M.; Heldebrant, D.J. CO2-triggered switchable solvents, surfactants, and other materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7240–7253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Darabi, A.; Jessop, P.G.; Cunningham, M.F. CO2-responsive polymeric materials: Synthesis, self-assembly, and functional applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4391–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Phan, L.; Chiu, D.; Heldebrant, D.J.; Huttenhower, H.; John, E.; Li, X.; Pollet, P.; Wang, R.; Eckert, C.A.; Liotta, C.L.; et al. Switchable solvents consisting of amidine/alcohol or guanidine/alcohol mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Phan, L.; Andreatta, J.R.; Horvey, L.K.; Edie, C.F.; Luco, A.L.; Mirchandani, A.; Darensbourg, D.J.; Jessop, P.G. Switchable-polarity solvents prepared with a single liquid component. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pollet, P.; Eckertabc, C.A.; Liotta, C.L. Switchable solvents. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phan, L.; Brown, H.; White, J.; Hodgson, A.; Jessop, P.G. Soybean oil extraction and separation using switchable or expanded solvents. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Samorì, C.; Torri, C.; Samorì, G.; Fabbri, D.; Galletti, P.; Guerrini, F.; Pistocchi, R.; Tagliavini, E. Extraction of hydrocarbons from microalga Botryococcus braunii with switchable solvents. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3274–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, Y.; Tang, Y.; Barashkov, N.N.; Irgibaeva, I.S.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Hu, R.; Birimzhanova, D.; Yu, Y.; Tang, B.Z. Fluorescent chemosensor for detection and quantitation of carbon dioxide gas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13951–13953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heldebrant, D.J.; Yonker, C.R.; Jessop, P.G.; Phan, L. Reversible Uptake of COS, CS2, and SO2: Ionic Liquids with O-Alkylxanthate, O-Alkylthiocarbonyl, and O-Alkylsulfite Anions. Chem. A Eur. J. 2009, 15, 7619–7627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, M.; Park, J.W. Reversible, solid state capture of carbon dioxide by hydroxylated amidines. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2507–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, J.; Kutnyakov, I.; Koech, P.K.; Zwoster, A.; Howard, C.; Zheng, F.; Freeman, C.J.; Heldebrant, D.J. CO2-binding-organic-liquids-enhanced CO2 capture using polarity-swing-assisted regeneration. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Blasucci, V.; Hart, R.; Mestre, V.L.; Hahne, D.J.; Burlager, M.; Huttenhower, H.; Thio, B.J.R.; Pollet, P.; Liotta, C.L.; Eckert, C.A. Single component, reversible ionic liquids for energy applications. Fuel 2010, 89, 1315–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, C.; Mahurin, S.M.; Luo, H.; Baker, G.A.; Li, H.; Dai, S. Reversible and robust CO2 capture by equimolar task-specific ionic liquid–Superbase mixtures. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 870–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.; Luo, X.; Luo, H.; Jiang, D.; Li, H.; Dai, S. Tuning the Basicity of Ionic Liquids for Equimolar CO2 Capture. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5020–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jessop, P.G.; Kozycz, L.; Rahami, Z.G.; Schoenmakers, D.; Boyd, A.R.; Wechsler, D.; Holland, A.M. Tertiary amine solvents having switchable hydrophilicity. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kohno, Y.; Arai, H.; Ohno, H. Dual stimuli-responsive phase transition of an ionic liquid/water mixture. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4772–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, Y.; Jessop, P.G.; Cunningham, M.; Eckert, C.A.; Liotta, C.L. Switchable surfactants. Science 2006, 313, 958–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Darwish, T.A.; Evans, R.A.; James, M.; Hanley, T.L. Spiropyran-amidine: A molecular canary for visual detection of carbon dioxide gas. Chem. A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11399–11404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Desset, S.L.; Cole-Hamilton, D.J. Carbon dioxide induced phase switching for homogeneous-catalyst recycling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1472–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moore, N.A.L. Method for Shear Coagulation of Latex Resins. U.S. Patent 4,623,678, 18 November 1986. [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith, A.E.; Xu, X.; Abell, T.U.; Kirkland, S.E.; Hensarling, R.M.; McCormick, C.L. Tuning nanostructure morphology and gold nanoparticle “locking” of multi-responsive amphiphilic diblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2958–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, D.; Tong, X.; Boissière, O.; Zhao, Y. General strategy for making CO2-switchable polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, A.S.; Bütün, V.; Vamvakaki, M.; Armes, S.P.; Pople, J.A.; Gast, A.P. Structure of pH-dependent block copolymer micelles: Charge and ionic strength dependence. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 8540–8551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lutz, J.F. Thermo-switchable materials prepared using the OEGMA-platform. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2237–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peppas, N.A.; Hilt, J.Z.; Khademhosseini, A.; Langer, R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1345–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, J.; Tong, X.; Zhao, Y. Photoresponsive nanogels based on photocontrollable cross-links. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 4845–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sumio, L. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins, P.G.; Zettl, A.; Bando, H.; Thess, A.; Smalley, R.E. Nanotube nanodevice. Science 1997, 278, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dai, H.J.; Kong, J.; Franklin, N.R.; Zhou, C.W.; Chapline, M.G.; Peng, S.; Cho, K.J. Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 2000, 287, 622–625. [Google Scholar]
  30. Baughman, R.H.; Zakhidov, A.A.; De Heer, W.A. Carbon Nanotubes—The Route Toward Applications. Science 2002, 297, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ajayan, P.M.; Tour, J.M. Materials science: Nanotube composites. Nature 2007, 447, 1066–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qu, L.; Peng, Q.; Dai, L.; Spinks, G.M.; Wallace, G.G.; Baughman, R.H. Carbon nanotube electroactive polymer materials: Opportunities and challenges. MRS Bull. 2008, 33, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhao, H.; Qiu, S.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Gao, C. Improving the performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by incorporation of modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 450, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vatanpour, V.; Esmaeili, M.; Farahani, M.H.D.A. Fouling reduction and retention increment of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes embedded by amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 466, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haeshin, L.; Shara, M.D.; William, M.M.; Phillip, B.M. Mussel-Inspired Surface Chemistry for Multifunctional Coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–431. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ye, Q.; Zhou, F.; Liu, W. Bioinspired catecholic chemistry for surface modification. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4244–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ryu, S.; Lee, Y.; Hwang, J.W.; Hong, S.; Kim, C.; Park, T.G.; Lee, H.; Hong, S.H. High-strength carbon nanotube fibers fabricated by infiltration and curing of mussel-inspired catecholamine polymer. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1971–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hong, S.; Na, Y.S.; Choi, S.; Song, I.T.; Kim, W.Y.; Lee, H. Non-covalent self-assembly and covalent polymerization co-contribute to polydopamine formation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4711–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carson, L.; Kelly-Brown, C.; Stewart, M.; Oki, A.; Regisford, G.; Luo, Z.; Bakhmutov, V.I. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan–carbon nanotube composites. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hafner, D.; Jordan, R. Substrate-independent Cu(0)-mediated controlled radical polymerization: Grafting of block copolymer brushes from poly(dopamine) modified surfaces. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 2129–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ding, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ngo, T.H.; Smet, M. Reversible dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes based on a CO2-responsive dispersant. Langmuir 2010, 26, 16667–16671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR of MWCNTs, MWCNTs-PDA, MWCNTs-PDA-BiBB, and MWCNTs-PDA-PDMAEMA.
Figure 1. FTIR of MWCNTs, MWCNTs-PDA, MWCNTs-PDA-BiBB, and MWCNTs-PDA-PDMAEMA.
Processes 09 01638 g001
Figure 2. TEM of (a) MWCNTs-PDA and (b) MWCNTs-PDA-PDMAEMA.
Figure 2. TEM of (a) MWCNTs-PDA and (b) MWCNTs-PDA-PDMAEMA.
Processes 09 01638 g002
Figure 3. TEM of MWCNTs.
Figure 3. TEM of MWCNTs.
Processes 09 01638 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra of MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA in water, inset (a) before CO2 purge and (b) after CO2 purge.
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra of MWCNT-PDA-PDMAEMA in water, inset (a) before CO2 purge and (b) after CO2 purge.
Processes 09 01638 g004
Figure 5. (a) UV-Vis transmittance of composite and water mixture at 610 nm with 6 CO2/N2 purge cycles; (b) UV-Vis transmittance of composite and water mixture at 610 nm against time.
Figure 5. (a) UV-Vis transmittance of composite and water mixture at 610 nm with 6 CO2/N2 purge cycles; (b) UV-Vis transmittance of composite and water mixture at 610 nm against time.
Processes 09 01638 g005
Scheme 1. The reaction between composite and CO2 leads to the separation of CNT bundles.
Scheme 1. The reaction between composite and CO2 leads to the separation of CNT bundles.
Processes 09 01638 sch001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Chen, X.; Han, D.; Zhao, Z.; Lu, W. Preparation of a Novel CO2-Responsive Polymer/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composite. Processes 2021, 9, 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091638

AMA Style

Ma Y, Chen X, Han D, Zhao Z, Lu W. Preparation of a Novel CO2-Responsive Polymer/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composite. Processes. 2021; 9(9):1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yonggang, Xin Chen, Dehui Han, Zhe Zhao, and Wenting Lu. 2021. "Preparation of a Novel CO2-Responsive Polymer/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composite" Processes 9, no. 9: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop