Next Article in Journal
Solvent Extraction of Boric Acid: Comparison of Five Different Monohydric Alcohols and Equilibrium Modeling with Numerical Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydraulic Design of Sediment-Trapping Basin in Wadis Using Empirical Equations and Deposition Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Double-Stage and Multi-Stage Capacitive Deionization Absorption Air-Conditioning System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vermicomposting Process to Endosulfan Lactone Removal in Solid Substrate Using Eisenia fetida

by
Paola T. Vázquez-Villegas
1,*,
Rocío Meza-Gordillo
2,
Abumalé Cruz-Salomón
3,
Víctor M. Ruíz-Valdiviezo
2,
Federico A. Gutiérrez-Miceli
2,
Juan J. Villalobos-Maldonado
2,
Joaquín A. Montes-Molina
2,
Janet Aguilar-Vázquez
2 and
Zaira Domínguez
4
1
Departamento de Ingeniería en Industrias Alimentarias, Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Cintalapa, Carretera Panamericana km 995, Cintalapa de Figueroa 30400, Mexico
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Bioquímica, Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Carretera Panamericana km 1080, Tuxtla Gutiérrez 29050, Mexico
3
Escuela de Ciencias Químicas, Sede Ocozocoautla, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas (UNACH), Carretera Panamericana Ocozocoautla—Cintalapa km 2.5, Ocozocoautla de Espinosa 29140, Mexico
4
Unidad SARA, Universidad Veracruzana. Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala s/n, Col. Industrial Ánimas, Xalapa 91190, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(2), 396; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020396
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 12 February 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioremediation Processes of Contaminated Soil and Sediments)

Abstract

:
Pesticide by-products found in soil are usually more toxic and persistent than the pesticides themselves. For example, Endosulfan lactone (EL) (a by-product of the organochloride pesticide endosulfan). EL is created by the enzymatic activity (and related oxidative processes) of microorganisms in the soil. A sustainable method of EL removal is the introduction of Eisenia fetida earthworm. In this paper, it will be demonstrated the impact of vermicomposting process related to Eisenia fetida earthworm on EL by measuring initial and final concentrations of the compound and overall enzymatic activity in sterile and non-sterile solid substrate over 56 days. As a baseline, it be observed there were higher EL removals in non-sterile solid substrate (90.86%) at day 5 than in sterile solid substrate (83.86%) at day 14. In samples with Eisenia fetida, the presence of EL in non-sterile solid substrate was 36%, however in sterile solid substrate it was only 18% at day 1 and 7, with a maximum enzyme activity of 0.4659 mmol/mg protein per min at day 7. The evidence found in this study suggests that EL removal in a non-sterile solid substrate is higher when a vermicomposting is present and that the influence of microorganisms from the solid substrate with the earthworm, increases removal.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Endosulfan is acutely toxic and facing a global ban. It has been specially applied for the control of aphids, beetles, caterpillars, mites, borers, bed bugs, moths, flies, and other insects in various crops such as coffee, cotton, cereals, tea, legumes, and fruit trees [1]. This pesticide is harmful to humans and for most animals, showing acute and chronic effects, even at low concentrations (10–160 mg of endosulfan/kg soil) [2,3]. It was banned due to its residual nature, high toxicity, persistence, long-distance transport, and bioaccumulation in fatty tissues [1,4], so it is also part of the Persistent Organic Compounds (POC’s) [5]. Despite the ban and acute environmental impact, some farmers continue to use endosulfan, which poses a serious threat to food security and human health.
Persistent use of endosulfan generates harmful by-products in the soil such as endosulfan lactone (EL) (C9H4Cl6O2), which has been identified in soil up to six years after the first exposure. This molecule is generated by the oxidation of endosulfan (Figure 1) [2,3,4,6], and has a polar structure that makes it toxic, persistent, and bioaccumulative [4]. One solution is the vermicomposting process, which can aid in the removal of certain POC’s from soil, add nutrients and stimulate crop production.
Vermicomposting is a low-cost eco-technological process that stimulates the bio-oxidation, degradation, and stabilization of organic residues in soil via the joint action of earthworms and microorganisms [5,7,8]. This efficient technological process can convert organic waste and contaminants into value-added products for ecological soil restoration [9].
The vermicomposting process (Figure 2) has three stages. In the first stage, the waste materials decompose by means of microorganisms (generally bacteria) working in tandem with earthworms. The two produce a homogeneous mixture of the substrate, which aerates and facilitates degradation in the soil. In this stage, the temperature begins at approximately 15 °C, however it increases due to the energy (metabolism) generated by the process, this increases of temperature (up to 50 °C) give way to the second stage called digestion. In the digestion phase, degradation of simple and semi-complex organic wastes in the substrate begins, with the help of some fungi, actinomycetes, and some derivatives of the digestive tract of the earthworm [10]. In the last stage, maturation and cooling, the rocky aggregates are stabilized, creating a homogeneous final product with fine granulometry.
Earthworms, such as Eisenia fetida (common names such as redworm, brandling worm, panfish worm, trout worm, tiger worm, and red wiggler worm), promote the removal of POC’s such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH’s) [7] and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) [8]. Eisenia fetida also feed on organic matter and contaminants present in the soil, improving its structure and aeration [9]. Making use of adsorption and absorption processes within vermicomposting, the interaction of the contaminant with the substrate and the earthworm is increased.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Endosulfan lactone and 6β-hydroxytestosterone were used as analytical standard (purity > 99%), provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Testosterone was provided by Bayer® (Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico). Molecular marker Precision Plus Protein (10–250 kD) was provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories (Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico). Acetonitrile, methylene chloride, acetone, and methanol were HPLC grade (purity ≥ 99.9%) and provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Potassium phosphate, magnesium chloride, glucose-6 -phosphate, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and NADPH were gradient grade provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Coomassie blue G250 and SDS were electrophoresis purity and provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories (Mexico). Glycine and Tris-base were electrophoresis purity and provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Raw Material and Solid Substrate

Rabbit manure used in this study was collected from a rabbit farm located in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico (latitude 16°45′11″ N and longitude 93°6′56″ W). It was dried and milled to particle diameter (0.144 mm). Peat moss was a commercial product, obtained from Promix Canadian Sphagnum (Quebec, QC, Canada); it was milled to particle diameter (0.144 mm) and used as support for the earthworms. The solid substrate used was composed by 85% peat moss and 15% pre-dried and ground rabbit manure [8].
Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were obtained from the Luanda Ranch, located in the municipality of Ocozocoautla de Espinosa, Mexico (latitude 16°45′41.26″ N and longitude 93°22′32.35″ W). Prior to the research, earthworms were matured in peat moss and rabbit manure for 2 months. Subsequently, adult earthworms with developed clitellum (sexually mature) were selected for the experiment.

2.3. Physicochemical Characteristics of the Solid Substrate and Vermicompost

The solid substrate and vermicompost were analyzed according to the Official Mexican Environmental Regulations [11]. Parameters measured were pH, moisture, inorganic nitrogen, total nitrogen (TN), real density, and organic matter [11]. The total organic carbon (TOC) was determined by the method of Walkley and Black [12] and C/N ratio was determined according to that reported by Durán and Henríquez [13]. All the tests were performed by triplicate.

2.4. Removal Process

The experimental units were 1 L amber glass jars with 50 g of solid substrate (85% peat moss and 15% rabbit excreta), covered with a cotton cloth to promote aeration. The humidity was adjusted to 70% with distilled water. Three concentrations of EL (determined by mean lethal concentration (LC50) [14,15]) and two quantities of earthworms were used. Units were kept at a constant ambient temperature of 25 °C ± 2 °C in a closed room with natural light. Every third day the substrate was manually homogenized, taking care not to stress the earthworms of each experimental unit. The removal process was carried out using solid substrate under non-sterile and sterile conditions; solid substrate sterilization was done according to the technique proposed by Peñaloza et al. [16] with slight modifications. Briefly, autoclave sterilization at 121 °C at 15 lb pressure for 20 min, three consecutive days. The test was performed for 56 days, the EL removal was measured on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 28, and 56 within solid substrate and earthworms, analyzed using a simple ANOVA (p < 0.05) and Tukey HSD method by triplicate. It should be mentioned that on each sampling day, the flasks of that day were taken and the substrate was separated from the earthworm for subsequent analysis in HPLC-UV; no new substrate was applied to any bottle.
The determination of EL in the solid substrate was carried out in accordance with that described by Li et al. [17] and Vázquez-Villegas et al. [18,19] with slight modifications. Briefly, 12 g of substrate with 75 mL of acetonitrile and 120 min of rotary agitation at 175 rpm. Determination of EL in earthworm was carried out in accordance with that reported by Mosleh et al. [20] and Aguilar-Vázquez [21] using methylene chloride:acetone (5:1) with 2 g of sample and 120 min of rotary agitation at 175 rpm, washing three times and centrifuging at 9500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. Both supernatants were used for high performance liquid chromatography analysis coupled to UV (HPLC-UV) [16,17]. The EL removal efficiency was determined using Equation (1) [22].
R e m o v a l   % = EL i EL f EL i     100
where EL i   is initial endosulfan lactone concentration, and EL f final endosulfan lactone concentration.

2.5. Optimization to EL Removal

For the optimization of the removal process a 3 2   response surface design with by triplicate was used, with 27 experimental units; the results were analyzed through a multifactor ANOVA design using the statistical software STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI ®, as shown in Table 1.

2.6. Enzyme Activity Measurement

Once the removal process was analyzed and optimized, earthworm enzyme activity was evaluated during the 14 days of the experiment. This was achieved by exposing the earthworms’ microsomes to 0.004 mg endosulfan lactone/kg solid substrate. The results were derived from the LC50 in artificial substrate tests [13] over 14 days taking samples on days 3, 5, 7, and 14 and as a control the results of day zero (0 mg/kg). First, the amount of protein was measured based on the method of Folin–Lowry [23]. Then, the microsomes were obtained based on the methodology of Zhang et al. [24] and Cao et al. [25] with slight modifications. Briefly, the activity of the subunit of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) CYP3A4 multienzyme complex was determined as an activity of 6β-hydroxystestosterone having testosterone as a substrate, this being the most used as hydroxyl are available for enzyme coupling.
The incubation system (200 µL) contained 60 µM testosterone, 3.3 mM MgCl2, 0.2–0.5 mg/mL microsomal protein, 3.3 mM glucose-6-phosphate, and 0.4 U/mL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and it was maintained at pH 7.4 with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer. The negative control was prepared without microsomal protein. The mixture was pre-incubated at 30 °C for 5 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 1 mM of NADPH (serving as an H+ donor) and was terminated by the addition of 100 µL of ice-cold methanol after a 30 min incubation. The samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min and the aliquot of the supernatant was injected directly for HPLC-UV analysis.
The testosterone and 6β-hydroxytestosterone were quantified at 254 nm, using a HPLC-UV (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) by the following conditions: C18 reverse phase column (5 μm × 4.6 mm × 250 mm); mobile phase A of methanol-water-acetonitrile (39:60:1, v/v) and mobile phase B of methanol-water-acetonitrile (80:18:2, v/v); flow rate of 0.7 mL/min for 30.5 min at a rate of 50% A and 50% B, and 52 min at a rate of 30% A and 70% B.

2.7. SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis

The sodium dodecyl polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was used to determine the approximate molecular weight of the microsomes obtained from the earthworms exposed to EL, which according to Li et al. [17] refers to cytochrome P450, whose expression is higher due to the presence of external stressors such as POPs and whose molecular weight can be corroborated with this technique. The SDS-PAGE was performed following the methodology described by Laemmli [26] and Li et al. [27], with slight modifications. Briefly, the separating gel was 15% and the stacking gel was 4%. Electrophoresis was carried out in a mini-Protean electrophoresis chamber. The gel was stained with Coomassie 1%. The electrophoresis conditions were the following: 80 V for 60 min and 50 V for 60 min using a 1× running buffer (Tris/Glycine/SDS). The obtained standards were compared with the standard (molecular marker).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Physicochemical Characteristics of Solid Substrate and Vermicompost

Use a solid substrate increased the availability of nutrients, organic matter, and microorganisms for vermicomposting, and thus created substrates similar to clay soil and sandy soils. Further, the solid substrate simulated a neutral environment for the growth and development of earthworms without any external stressor (other than the contaminant in question).
The physicochemical parameters shown in Table 2 refer to the solid substrate and the vermicompost made after 56 days. By then, earthworms already fed on the substrate and excreted vermicompost. The results demonstrate that vermicompost can be used in 1:1 ratio with standard agricultural soil to increase the availability of nutrients and provide optimum soil for plant growth on agricultural land, this being a sustainable alternative to increase the richness of the soil.
The solid substrate has less humidity in relation to the vermicompost, because the solid substrate is adjusted to 70% humidity to allow earthworms to take the necessary nutrients from it and have better mobility. Regarding pH, both the solid substrate and the vermicompost have a neutral or slightly basic pH. That is because earthworms can stabilize the pH of the food they eat, due to the fact that they secrete calcium carbonate which balances the soil’s pH [13].
The solid substrate contains a high content of inorganic nitrogen (48 mg/kg), present in the form of nitrates, nitrites, and ammonium. These are absorbed by plants and are part of plant nutrition. So, it is related to the total nitrogen content (0.25%), present in the form of proteins, amino acids, etc. These not only forming part of the soil, but also the microorganisms that inhabit it [28]. In turn, the microorganisms help in the formation of vermicompost. As for the content of organic matter, it is related to nitrogen content. That is, if the nitrogen content is high, the organic matter is high; this may be due to external factors such as atmospheric temperature and excess moisture which, favor the availability of microorganisms, which is completely related to the removal process of this research.
Vermicompost has a high nitrogen content (0.30%), which improves the availability of nitrogen in the soil for plants and is related to the theoretical obtaining of organic carbon values (14.15%) as a carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio that indicates the potential of the soil to transform organic matter into mineral nitrogen.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [31], recommends the use of soils with a C/N ratio of 50 to 100 for the biodegradation of soils contaminated with hydrocarbons, because higher amounts of carbon more efficiently aid assimilation of pollutants by soil microorganisms [32]. The vermicompost obtained from solid substrate vermicomposting has a C/N ratio close to that required by the EPA, which suggests that it is a viable option for the use of bioremediation of contaminated soils and removal of contaminants such as EL.

3.2. Non-Sterile Solid Substrate

3.2.1. Endosulfan Lactone Removal on Non-Sterile Solid Substrate

The EL removal percentages obtained in non-sterile solid substrate throughout the days of sampling are observed in Figure 3; in which it can be seen that the removals are <20% for zero earthworms this percentage is due to the presence of microorganisms in the substrate. Substrate with 5 and 10 earthworms had greater removal on day 5 (85–95%) for the three concentrations used. There is no significant statistical difference on days 7 and 14 for 5 and 10 earthworms in the concentration of 0.004 mg/kg (Figure 3B) and 0.009 mg/kg (Figure 3C); however, there was a statistical difference in concentration of 0.001 mg/kg (Figure 3A). As of day 14, removal decreases without statistically significant difference for 5 and 10 earthworms at the concentration of 0.009 mg/kg (Figure 3C); however, there is a significant statistical difference between 5 and 10 earthworms at concentrations of 0.001 and 0.004 mg/kg on days 28 and 56 (Figure 3A,B). For the three concentrations, the removal increases slightly in the samples without earthworms at day 56, which may be due to the composting process carried out by the microorganisms of the substrate. That said, EL removal is greater in samples containing earthworms. One reason being that the earthworms form grooves in their mid-sections where they are aerating and mixing the soil. These grooves improve the availability of nutrients for the microorganisms and for themselves.
The results of the natural removal process are variable since it is a system with living organisms and changing conditions. In this investigation, external factors such as temperature, humidity and light were controlled. As a result, we found each individual organism behaved differently; however, similar behavior was observed in groups of 5 to 10 earthworms.
Coutiño-González et al. [33], evaluated the removal of anthracene using Eisenia fetida and found a removal of 41% and 93% in earthworm’s experiments, over 70 days, thus demonstrating how earthworms effectively accelerates the removal of contaminants in soil, conditioning the substrate and altering the biological activity.
Earthworms also stimulate microbial activity through the excretion of degradable carbon. Microbial activity in turn accelerates the degradation of organic matter, which ultimately assists in the removal of contaminants (and the degradation products from contaminants) from the soil [9].
Moreover, Ali et al. [34], evaluated the removal of endosulfan α and β, using a plant residue compost using a continuous large-scale rotary drum composter, having 84.95% and 83.20% removals for endosulfan α and β respectively at eight days. They had a microbial consortium that included Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Lactobacillus sp. and concluded that the removal technique is capable of eliminating organochlorine pesticide compounds from vegetables because the synergy of composter and microorganisms accelerates the removal of contaminants.
Combined with this research, it has found microorganisms working together with earthworms do an excellent job in a short time (56 days) of removing contaminants. Additionally, the application of this EL removal process helps in bioremediation of contaminated soils where pesticide products remain for more than 10 years and are difficult to remove.
Examples of microorganisms that could be involved in the removal process would be Rhodococcus strains, specifically Rhodococcus MTCC 6716, extracted from the Metaphire posthuma worm, which has been able to degrade endosulfan to 92.58% in 15 days [35], Pusillimonas sp. JW2 and Bordetella petrii NS strains, isolated of endosulfan contaminated environments, having more than 95% degradation of endosulfan to alpha and beta endosulfan in an in-situ bioremediation [36].

3.2.2. Endosulfan Lactone in Earthworm

It was essential to evaluate the presence of EL in the earthworm, in order to evaluate the effect of the contaminant on Eisenia fetida. An important factor was the route of entry of the pollutants into the earthworm, either through its tegument or its gastrointestinal tract. The phenomenon of adsorption is greater in the tegument than gastrointestinal tract [37].
Analyzing the presence of EL in earthworms (Figure 4), it can be observed that the highest concentration is found on day 1, decreasing as the days pass without statistically significant difference between 0.001 mg/kg and 0.004 mg/kg and between 5 and 10 earthworms.
From day 1 to 3, earthworms go through an adaptation process in which they consume the largest amount of substrate. This is due to stressor agents found in the environment (for example EL) and simply trying to survive. Next, earthworms begin to excrete vermicompost, which is reported as a nutritious organic fertilizer, rich in micronutrients and microorganisms beneficial to the soil such as nitrogen fixing bacteria and actinomycetes, as well as some growth hormones [38]. As of day 5, the earthworms begin to perform removal functions that are conducive to the removal of persistent organic compounds, which create synergy between the earthworms, their functions, and their excreta, as well as the properties and microorganisms contained in the substrate. Earthworm dejections have a very large microbiota richness, with about 2 × 1012 colonies/g of humus produced [13].
It should be noted that, Kauschke et al. [39] and Bilej et al. [40] reported the celomic fluid of earthworms (a by-product of their immune system, which can be stimulated by external stress), can act in two ways: (a) Eliminating any substance by phagocytosis, that is, encapsulating the component in question for its subsequent excretion to the environment; (b) Increasing the enzymatic activity to transform the pollutant molecules into more polar ones that can be exploited by the microorganisms of the digestive tract of the earthworm or those found in the environment in which it lives.
This process can be stimulated in earthworms when affected by EL.

3.3. Sterile Solid Substrate

3.3.1. Endosulfan Lactone Removal on Sterile Solid Substrate

EL removal percentages found in sterile solid substrate shown in Figure 5. Notice that removal is less in the first three days; however, it increases from day 5 for 5 and 10 earthworms and for 0.004 mg/kg (Figure 5B) and 0.009 mg/kg (Figure 5C), with no statistically significant difference. Removal otherwise occurs in the concentration of 0.001 mg/kg (Figure 5A) where the maximum removal is obtained at 7 days with 10 earthworms having significant statistical difference between day 7 and 14 and between 0, 5, and 10 earthworms.
The maximum EL removal occurs between days 5, 7, and 14 with 78% removal. In experiments without earthworms, removal is observed, having the maximum at day 5 (35%) and a statistical difference with respect to the remaining days. For days 28 and 56 the removal decreases without statistically significant difference for 5 and 10 earthworms. This suggests that from day 1, earthworms colonized the medium with microorganisms from their gastrointestinal tract which assists the removal process.

3.3.2. Endosulfan Lactone in Earthworm

In Figure 6 the presence of EL in earthworm in sterile solid substrate is shown. It can be observed that the highest final concentration is found with 10 earthworms and at the initial concentration of 0.009 mg/kg without statistically significant difference on day 7. For initial concentrations of 0.001 mg/kg and 0.004 mg/kg, the final concentrations found are lower compared to those of the solid substrate non-sterile (Figure 4), this is due to the fact that the earthworm does not ingest the same amount of substrate. That is because the number of microorganisms increase as the experiment continues, thus speeding up vermicomposting process.

3.4. Optimization of Endosulfan Lactone Removal

The results of the experimental design response surface 3 2 , are given as a result of the optimum value for removal (90.86%), which was just on day 5, with 0.009 mg EL/kg and eight earthworms. This can be seen in Figure 7, represented by an asterisk.
The second order polynomial model generated is
O R % =   45.5192     215.485   EL   +   16.5857   EW +   254.861   EL 2     9.4625   EL EW   0.5223   EW 2 R 2   =   97.57 % .
where OR is the optimum removal, [EL] is the endosulfan lactone concentration and EW is the number of earthworms.
Villalobos-Maldonado et al. [8] evaluated the removal of decachlorobiphenyl using Eisenia fetida and non-sterile conditions, finding a removal of 95.38% in the first seven days of the experiment, without showing a statistically significant difference between the use of three or five earthworms per experimental unit from an initial decachlorobiphenyl concentration of 200 mg/L. This means that the use of earthworms with microorganisms in the environment where the vermicomposting process is performed, having immersed to the contaminant, play an important role in the process of removal of COPs as polychlorinated biphenyls or pesticides, regardless the use of three or five earthworms.
The optimum removal (%) generated by the experimental design for sterile solid substrate was 83.86% on day 14 with 10 earthworms and 0.0045 mg/kg endosulfan lactone which can be seen in Figure 8 with a diagram of response surface contours.
The second order polynomial equation was
R % =   22.4114   187.693   EL + 8.874   EW   159.657 EL 2     2.29083 EL EW   0.492967   EW 2 R 2   =   91.74 % .
The presence of microorganisms in non-sterile solid substrate generates higher removal percentages, in less time, compared to the sterile solid substrate.

3.5. Enzymatic Activity

For the enzyme activity, the amount of protein present in the extracted microsomes of exposed earthworms to the EL was evaluated; the results are shown in Figure 9.
On day zero no significant statistical difference was found in the amount of Eisenia fetida protein in experiments with or without endosulfan lactone. However, on days 7 and 14 a difference was found between the negative control and experiments containing endosulfan lactone (0.004 mg/kg), observing the increase at day 7.
Similar behavior is observed in the polyacrylamide gel (Figure 10): in the negative control (zero days) the bands corresponding to cytochrome P450 are not observed, while at 3, 5, 7, and 14 days of substrate exposure with 0.004 mg/kg is a protein of approximately 50–37 KDa similar to the molecular weight of cytochrome P450, specifically the CYP3A4 subunit [25,41]. It is important to clarify that in this protein extract, in addition to CYP450, other enzymatic proteins that can be found in the earthworm, such as superoxide bismutase, glutathione S-transferase, and catalase [42]; lumbrokinase and aldehyde dehydrogenase (among others) are related to earthworm metabolism [43]; in addition to some CYP450 sub units such as CYP1A2, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4 [44].
Some authors [45,46] have evaluated the presence and activity of the cytochrome P450 subunits in Eisenia fetida exposed to various polluting organic compounds and heavy metals and mention that the expression of this multienzyme complex is higher when the exposure occurs for the first time, However, when the process continues for more than 30 days, a process of adaptation of the earthworm to the exposure of the contaminant is achieved. Similar to the results found in this research, cytochrome is not only expressed when there are dangerous chemical compounds, but also in inorganic molecules that represent a danger to the environment, thus highlighting the diversity of action of the earthworm Eisenia fetida and its ability to help with microorganisms to remove POCs.
The corresponding kinetic parameters are shown in Table 3; in which it is observed that the enzymatic activity increases with respect to the control when Eisenia fetida is subjected to LC50 in solid substrate. The value of Km with respect to the control increases on the days of sampling, showing greater value of Km at day 3, but having a lower affinity of the enzyme for the solid substrate. This may be due to the earthworm being immersed in a substrate that serves as support for its survival, but not as food. This solid substrate could contain certain microorganisms that are influencing the participation of other microorganisms-related enzymes; although this was not so in the qualitative test of SDS-PAGE (Figure 10).
Enzymatic activity is greater at day 7, with a statistical difference compared to the remaining days (Table 3) and especially with regard to the control (day zero). Similarly, relative enzymatic activity peaked at day 7 (Figure 11), including a significant statistical difference across the remaining days.
These results help explain why earthworms are able to adapt to very different and widely contaminated soils. They also show how earthworms provide important data for ecotoxicology studies, since they function as biomarkers of contaminated soils. Earthworms also signal the presence of enzymes that facilitate biodegradation and biotransformation of contaminants. This is due to the higher protein expression compared with the control and the highest enzyme activity when the earthworm is in a contaminated medium. However, it should be noted that earthworms do not act alone, but also in tandem with microorganisms in the substrate, those in the digestive tract of the earthworm and those that are excreted into the environment. All of which form vermicompost and removing POCs.

4. Conclusions

The vermicomposting system using Eisenia fetida was significant for the removal of endosulfan lactone in solid substrate.
The non-sterile solid substrate favored the endosulfan lactone removal process. However, in sterile solid substrate there was removal, demonstrating that earthworms and microorganisms play an important role in these processes, because they improve the conditions in the solid substrate through soil mixing and oxygenation.
The presence of cytochrome P450 multienzyme complex is an indicator of the presence of contaminants in the solid substrate, due to the increase in enzymatic activity in Eisenia fetida.
By measuring final concentrations in the substrate and in the earthworm, it has found the vermicomposting process can be a sustainable alternative for the removal of EL in the substrate. Further, it was found an optimal removal percentage so that the process could be standardized and applied on agricultural soil with remaining by-products derived from the endosulfan pesticide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.-G.; Data curation, P.T.V.-V. and J.A.-V.; Formal analysis, P.T.V.-V. and J.A.-V.; Funding acquisition, R.M.-G. and J.J.V.-M.; Investigation, P.T.V.-V. and J.A.-V.; Methodology, P.T.V.-V.; Project administration, R.M.-G. and J.J.V.-M.; Resources, R.M.-G., F.A.G.-M., J.J.V.-M., and J.A.M.-M.; Software, V.M.R.-V. and F.A.G.-M.; Supervision, R.M.-G.; Validation, V.M.R.-V., F.A.G.-M., J.J.V.-M., J.A.M.-M., and Z.D.; Visualization, V.M.R.-V.; Writing—original draft, P.T.V.-V.; Writing—review and editing, P.T.V.-V., R.M.-G., and A.C.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tecnológico Nacional De México—Instituto Tecnológico De Tuxtla Gutiérrez (August, 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Teresa del Rosario Ayora Talavera and Ana Luisa Ramos Díaz of CIATEJ Mérida, México for the facilities granted to conduct a research stay. The authors are grateful to the National Science and Technology Council and to the National Technology of Mexico/Technological Institute in Tuxtla Gutierrez for financial support (428828).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Odukkathil, G.; Vasudevan, N. Residues of endosulfan in surface and subsurface agricultural soil and its bioremediation. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 165, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bejarano, F.; Souza, J.; Weber, J.M.; Guadarrama, C.; Escamilla, E.; Beristain, B.; Ramirez, F. El Endosulfán y sus Alternativas en América Latina; Red de Acción en Plaguicidas y Alternativas de América Latina: Mexico City, Mexico, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee. Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the Work of Its Fifth Meeting; UNEP/POPS/POPRC.5/10/Add.2; UNEP: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Betancurt, L.A.; Ocampo, R.; Ríos, L.A. La problemática del endosulfán: Aspectos químicos, analíticos y ambientales. Luna Azul 2015, 40, 293–313. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee. Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the Work of Its First Meeting; UNEP/POPS/POPRC; UNEP: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Park, B.-S.; Yoo, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-E.; Lee, S.-E. Biotransformation of endosulfan by the tiger worm, Eisenia fetida. J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 2012, 1, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Contreras-Ramos, S.M.; Alvarez-Bernal, D.; Dendooven, L. Characteristics of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) in PAHs contami-nated soil amended with sewage sludge or vermicompost. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2009, 41, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Villalobos-Maldonado, J.J.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Mancilla-Margalli, N.A.; Ayora-Talavera, T.R.; Rodríguez-Mendiola, M.A.; Arias-Castro, C.; Vázquez-Villegas, P.T.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A.; Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V.M. Removal of Decachlorobiphenyl in Vermicomposting Process Amended with Rabbit Manure and Peat Moss. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dendooven, L.; Alvarez-Bernal, D.; Contreras-Ramos, S.M. Earthworms, a means to accelerate removal of hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil? A mini-review. Pedobiologia 2011, 54, S187–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Villalobos-Moldonado, J.J.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Enciso-Sáenz, S.; Castañon-González, J.H.; Rosales-Quintero, A.; Lagu-nas-Rivera, S.; Rincón-Rosales, R. Identificación molecular de bacterias en Eisenia fetida Savigny cultivadas, con potencial de remoción de contaminantes orgánicos persistentes. Agroproductividad 2017, 10, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. NOM-021-RECNAT-2000. Establece las especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos. Estudios, muestreos y análisis. Diario Of. Fed. 2000, 14, 17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Durán, L.; Henríquez, C. Caracterización química, física y microbiológica de vermicompostes producidos a partir de cinco sustratos orgánicos. Agron. Costarric. 2007, 31, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  14. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD. Earthworm, acute toxicity test-207. In OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vazquez-Villegas, P.T.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A.; Ruiz-Valdiviezo, V.M.; Villalobos-Maldonado, J.J.; Montes-Molina, J.A.; Fernadez-Toledo, A.A.J. Determinación de CL50 y CE50 de endosulfán lactona y diazinón en lombriz de tierra (Eisenia foetida). Agroproductividad 2018, 11, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  16. Peñaloza, G.S.A.; Rincon, D.J.P.; Restrepo, L.G.C. Evaluation of wet sterilization and microwave sterilization of two types of soil. Rev. Científica 2013, 1, 87–93. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, W.; Dai, Y.; Xue, B.; Li, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhang, J.; Yan, Y. Biodegradation and detoxification of endosulfan in aqueous me-dium and soil by Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain CS5. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vázquez-Villegas, P.T. Toxicological and Physiological Responses of Eisenia fetida Exposed to Endosulfan Lactone. Ph.D. Thesis, Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vázquez-Villegas, P.T.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Luján-Hidalgo, M.C.; Cruz-Salomón, A.; Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V.M.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A.; Montes-Molina, J.A. Optimization and validation of an extraction method for endosulfan lactone on a solid substrate. Processes 2021, 9, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mosleh, Y.Y.; Couderchet, M.; Vernet, G. Acute and sublethal effects of two insecticides on earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) under laboratory conditions. Environ. Toxicol. 2003, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aguilar-Vázquez, J. Bioacumulación y Eliminación de Endosulfán Lactona en Eisenia fetida. Master’s Thesis, Tecnológico Nacio-nal de México/IT Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Islam, M.A.; Sakkas, V.; Albanis, T.A. Application of statistical design of experiment with desirability function for the removal of organophosphorus pesticide from aqueous solution by low-cost material. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Layne, E. Spectrophotometric and turbidimetric methods for measuring proteins. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1957; Volume 3, pp. 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, T.; Zhu, Y.; Gunaratna, C. Rapid and quantitative determination of metabolites from multiple cytochrome P450 probe substrates by gradient liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 780, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cao, X.; Song, Y.; Kai, J.; Yang, X.; Ji, P. Evaluation of EROD and CYP3A4 activities in earthworm Eisenia fetida as biomarkers for soil heavy metal contamination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.; Xiao, N.W.; Liu, X.H.; Ge, F. Effect of herbicide acetochlor on cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and GST of earthworms Eisenia fetida. J. Environ. Sci. China 2006, 18, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  28. Perdomo, C.; Barbazán, M.; Durán, J. Área de Suelos y Aguas. CÁTEDRA de Fertilidad; Universidad de la Republica: Motevideo, Uruguay, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. Castillo-Cerma, C.M. Selección y Calibración de Indicadores Locales y Técnicos para Evaluar la Degradación de los Suelos Lade-ras, enla Microcuenca Cuscamá el Tuma. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Nacional Agraria, Managua, Nicaragua, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vanegas, A.F.C. Relación del Carbono y Nitrógeno del Suelo con Usos y Coberturas del Terreno en Alcalá, Valle del Cauca. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. EPA. Ecological Effects Test Guidelines; OPPTS 850.4225 Seedling Emergence, Tier II; National Service Center for Environmental Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vijver, M.; Wolterbeek, H.; Vink, J.P.; Vangestel, C. Surface adsorption of metals onto the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus and the isopod Porcellio scaber is negligible compared to absorption in the body. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 340, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Coutiño-González, E.; Hernández-Carlos, B.; Gutiérrez-Ortiz, R.; Dendooven, L. The earthworm Eisenia fetida accelerates the removal of anthracene and 9, 10-anthraquinone, the most abundant degradation product, in soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2010, 64, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ali, M.; Kazmi, A.; Ahmed, N. Study on effects of temperature, moisture and pH in degradation and degradation kinetics of aldrin, endosulfan, lindane pesticides during full-scale continuous rotary drum composting. Chemosphere 2014, 102, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Verma, K.; Agrawal, N.; Farooq, M.; Misra, R.; Hans, R. Endosulfan degradation by a Rhodococcus strain isolated from earthworm gut. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 64, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Du, Z.; Zhang, C. Influence of isolated bacterial strains on the in situ bio-degradation of endosulfan and the reduction of endosulfán-contaminated soil toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Viñas Canals, M. Biorremediación de Suelos Contaminados por Hidrocarburos: Caracterización Microbiológica, Química y Ecotoxicológica. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  38. Adhikary, S. Vermicompost, the story of organic gold: A review. Agric. Sci. 2012, 3, 905–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kauschke, E.; Mohrig, W.; Cooper, E.L. Coelomic fluid proteins as basic components of innate immunity in earthworms. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2007, 43, S110–S115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bilej, M.; Procházková, P.; Šilerová, M.; Josková, R. Earthworm Immunity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 708, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qiu, X.; Li, W.; Tian, Y.; Leng, X. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in the cotton bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Tissue difference and induction. J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ji, C.; Wu, H.; Wei, L.; Zhao, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J. Proteomic and metabolomic analysis of earthworm Eisenia fetida exposed to different concentrations of 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether. J. Proteom. 2013, 91, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, X.; Chang, L.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, Y. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in the earth-worm Eisenia fetida during Escherichia coli O157: H7 stress. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6547–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lu, X.; Li, Y.; Thunders, M.; Cavanagh, J.; Matthew, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Qiu, J. Differential protein expression and localization of CYP450 enzymes in three species of earthworm; is this a reflection of environmental adaptation? Chemosphere 2017, 171, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Achazi, R.K.; Flenner, C.; Livingstone, D.R.; Peters, L.D.; Schaub, K.; Scheiwe, E. Cytochrome P450 and dependent activities in unexposed and PAH-exposed terrestrial annelids. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 1998, 121, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cao, X.; Bi, R.; Song, Y. Toxic responses of cytochrome P450 sub-enzyme activities to heavy metals exposure in soil and correlation with their bioaccumulation in Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Degradation of endosulfan pesticide to endosulfan lactone by-product.
Figure 1. Degradation of endosulfan pesticide to endosulfan lactone by-product.
Processes 09 00396 g001
Figure 2. Vermicomposting process in the solid substrate.
Figure 2. Vermicomposting process in the solid substrate.
Processes 09 00396 g002
Figure 3. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) removal (%) on non-sterile solid substrate with (A) 0.001 mg/kg, (B) 0.004 mg/kg and (C) 0.009 mg/kg for zero (▲), five (■) and ten (•) earthworms.
Figure 3. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) removal (%) on non-sterile solid substrate with (A) 0.001 mg/kg, (B) 0.004 mg/kg and (C) 0.009 mg/kg for zero (▲), five (■) and ten (•) earthworms.
Processes 09 00396 g003
Figure 4. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) concentration for 5(■) and 10(•) earthworms in non-sterile solid substrate with 0.001 mg/kg (■, •), 0.004 mg/kg (■, •) and 0.009 mg/kg (■, •).
Figure 4. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) concentration for 5(■) and 10(•) earthworms in non-sterile solid substrate with 0.001 mg/kg (■, •), 0.004 mg/kg (■, •) and 0.009 mg/kg (■, •).
Processes 09 00396 g004
Figure 5. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) removal (%) on sterile solid substrate with (A) 0.001 mg/kg, (B) 0.004 mg/kg and (C) 0.009 mg/kg for zero (▲), five (■) and ten (•) earthworms.
Figure 5. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) removal (%) on sterile solid substrate with (A) 0.001 mg/kg, (B) 0.004 mg/kg and (C) 0.009 mg/kg for zero (▲), five (■) and ten (•) earthworms.
Processes 09 00396 g005
Figure 6. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) concentration for 5(■) and 10(•) earthworms in sterile solid substrate with 0.001 mg/kg (■, •), 0.004 mg/kg (■, •) and 0.009 mg/kg (■, •).
Figure 6. Endosulfan Lactone (EL) concentration for 5(■) and 10(•) earthworms in sterile solid substrate with 0.001 mg/kg (■, •), 0.004 mg/kg (■, •) and 0.009 mg/kg (■, •).
Processes 09 00396 g006
Figure 7. Representation of the response surface using the contour plot for endosulfan lactone removal on day 5 in non-sterile solid substrate.
Figure 7. Representation of the response surface using the contour plot for endosulfan lactone removal on day 5 in non-sterile solid substrate.
Processes 09 00396 g007
Figure 8. Representation of the response surface by contour plot for endosulfan lactone removal on day 14 in sterile solid substrate.
Figure 8. Representation of the response surface by contour plot for endosulfan lactone removal on day 14 in sterile solid substrate.
Processes 09 00396 g008
Figure 9. Amount of protein (mg/L) in Eisenia fetida exposed to endosulfan lactone in solid substrate at 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days. Lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for each day of exposure and uppercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between concentrations.
Figure 9. Amount of protein (mg/L) in Eisenia fetida exposed to endosulfan lactone in solid substrate at 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days. Lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for each day of exposure and uppercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between concentrations.
Processes 09 00396 g009
Figure 10. Sodium dodecyl polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoretic pattern of microsomes extracted from Eisenia fetida exposed to endosulfan lactone in solid substrate. M (molecular marker), BSA (bovine serum albumin), 3 (earthworms exposed for 3 days), 5 (earthworms exposed for 5 days), 7 (earthworms exposed for 7 days), 14 (earthworms exposed for 14 days), and C (control at 0 days exposition).
Figure 10. Sodium dodecyl polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoretic pattern of microsomes extracted from Eisenia fetida exposed to endosulfan lactone in solid substrate. M (molecular marker), BSA (bovine serum albumin), 3 (earthworms exposed for 3 days), 5 (earthworms exposed for 5 days), 7 (earthworms exposed for 7 days), 14 (earthworms exposed for 14 days), and C (control at 0 days exposition).
Processes 09 00396 g010
Figure 11. Relative enzyme activity (measured with respect to control), during 14 days of exposure. Lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for each day of exposure and uppercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between concentrations.
Figure 11. Relative enzyme activity (measured with respect to control), during 14 days of exposure. Lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for each day of exposure and uppercase letters indicate the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between concentrations.
Processes 09 00396 g011
Table 1. Factors used in the optimization of endosulfan lactone removal.
Table 1. Factors used in the optimization of endosulfan lactone removal.
Endosulfan Lactone (mg/kg)Earthworm (Number)
0.0010
0.0045
0.00910
Table 2. Physicochemical characteristics of solid substrate and vermicompost.
Table 2. Physicochemical characteristics of solid substrate and vermicompost.
ParameterSolid SubstrateVermicompostReference ValuesReferences
Moisture (%)36 ± 5.692 ± 2.6-[11]
pH6.9 ± 0.087.3 ± 0.02Strongly acidic (<5.0)
Moderately acidic (5.1–6.5)
Neutral (6.6–7.3)
Moderately alkaline (7.4–8.5)
Strongly alkaline (>8.5)
NInorganic (mg/Kg)48 ± 1.956 ± 5.8Very low (0–10 mg/Kg)
Low (10–20 mg/Kg)
Medium (20–40 mg/Kg)
High (40–60 mg/Kg)
Very high (>60 mg/Kg)
NTotal (%)0.25 ± 0.0020.30 ± 0.008Very low (<0.05%)
Low (0.05–0.10%)
Medium (0.10–0.15%)
High (0.15–0.25%)
Very high (>0.25%)
Real density (g/cm3)1.05 ± 0.0061.19 ± 0.006Very low (<2.4)
Low (2.4–2.60)
Medium (2.60–2.80)
High (>2.80)
[29]
Organic matter
(%) a
7.3 ± 0.3410.9 ± 0.26Very low (<0.5%)
Low (0.6–1.5%)
Medium (1.6–3.5%)
High (3.6–6.0%)
Very high (>6.0%)
[11]
TOC (%)7.48 ± 0.2614.15 ± 0.69-
C/N29.9247.17C/N low (<10)
C/N high (>25)
[13,30]
a The organic matter was analyzed using the Walkley and Black [12] methodology, in which between 70% and 84% of the total organic carbon is detected, so it is necessary to introduce a correction factor of 1.298. Each value represents the mean of 3 replicates ± standard deviation.
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex in Eisenia fetida exposed for 14 days.
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex in Eisenia fetida exposed for 14 days.
Sample
(Days)
Vmax
(μmol/min)
Km
(μmol)
Enzymatic Activity (mmol/mg Protein Per min)
00.0155 e0.7274 e0.2087 e
30.0187 d3.0458 a0.2518 d
50.0233 c2.7540 b0.3138 c
70.0346 b2.5489 c0.4659 a
140.0502 a2.0157 d 0.3730 b
Letter (a, b, c, d, e) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vázquez-Villegas, P.T.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Cruz-Salomón, A.; Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V.M.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A.; Villalobos-Maldonado, J.J.; Montes-Molina, J.A.; Aguilar-Vázquez, J.; Domínguez, Z. Vermicomposting Process to Endosulfan Lactone Removal in Solid Substrate Using Eisenia fetida. Processes 2021, 9, 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020396

AMA Style

Vázquez-Villegas PT, Meza-Gordillo R, Cruz-Salomón A, Ruíz-Valdiviezo VM, Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Villalobos-Maldonado JJ, Montes-Molina JA, Aguilar-Vázquez J, Domínguez Z. Vermicomposting Process to Endosulfan Lactone Removal in Solid Substrate Using Eisenia fetida. Processes. 2021; 9(2):396. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vázquez-Villegas, Paola T., Rocío Meza-Gordillo, Abumalé Cruz-Salomón, Víctor M. Ruíz-Valdiviezo, Federico A. Gutiérrez-Miceli, Juan J. Villalobos-Maldonado, Joaquín A. Montes-Molina, Janet Aguilar-Vázquez, and Zaira Domínguez. 2021. "Vermicomposting Process to Endosulfan Lactone Removal in Solid Substrate Using Eisenia fetida" Processes 9, no. 2: 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop