Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Bacillus subtilis Growth and Sporulation by Two-Stage Solid-State Fermentation Strategy
Next Article in Special Issue
Implementation of Production Process Standardization—A Case Study of a Publishing Company from the SMEs Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Economic Analysis of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse Using a Sequential Deacetylation, Hot Water and Disk-Refining Pretreatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Air-Core–Liquid-Ring (ACLR) Atomization Part II: Influence of Process Parameters on the Stability of Internal Liquid Film Thickness and Resulting Spray Droplet Sizes
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

What Is the Right Innovation Type for Your Industry? Evidence from Chemical Firms in Korea

1
College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
College of Business Administration, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(10), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100643
Received: 27 July 2019 / Revised: 7 September 2019 / Accepted: 9 September 2019 / Published: 20 September 2019
The literature has two different perspectives on which innovation types should be implemented to achieve innovation performance; some argue that they should pursue process-oriented innovation, while others maintain that both product- and process-oriented innovation should be performed. Though innovation efficiency should be measured, which takes both input and output variables into account, the research so far has been measured only with the performance of the innovation. Accordingly, this study identifies which innovation type is the most advantageous in terms of innovation efficiency for the chemical firms. We use data of 64 Korean chemical companies from a 2016 Korean innovation survey and perform data envelopment analysis to calculate innovation efficiency. Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and bootstrap DEA were also conducted to compare the difference of innovation efficiency among groups, depending on which innovation types are oriented. The result shows that focusing on process innovation rather than both product and process innovation is more appropriate to achieve higher innovation efficiency, and pursuing process innovation rather than product innovation tends to achieve a higher level of innovation efficiency in the Korean chemical industry. View Full-Text
Keywords: innovation efficiency; product innovation; process innovation; data envelopment analysis; chemical industry; efficiency measurement innovation efficiency; product innovation; process innovation; data envelopment analysis; chemical industry; efficiency measurement
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, J.; Kim, Y.; Yang, H.; Kim, C. What Is the Right Innovation Type for Your Industry? Evidence from Chemical Firms in Korea. Processes 2019, 7, 643.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop