Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Pore Size Distribution of Amorphous Silica-Based Membrane by the Activation Energies of Gas Permeation
Next Article in Special Issue
Offshore Power Plants Integrating a Wind Farm: Design Optimisation and Techno-Economic Assessment Based on Surrogate Modelling
Previous Article in Journal
A New Method for the Process Division and Effect Evaluation of Coagulation Based on Particle Size Fractal Dimension
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Dynamic Model and Control System for Load-Following Studies of Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power Plants
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperReview
Processes 2018, 6(12), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6120238

Modeling and Simulation of Energy Systems: A Review

1
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Kolbjørn Hejes vei 1B, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 October 2018 / Revised: 14 November 2018 / Accepted: 18 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Simulation of Energy Systems)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2532 KB, uploaded 23 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

Energy is a key driver of the modern economy, therefore modeling and simulation of energy systems has received significant research attention. We review the major developments in this area and propose two ways to categorize the diverse contributions. The first categorization is according to the modeling approach, namely into computational, mathematical, and physical models. With this categorization, we highlight certain novel hybrid approaches that combine aspects of the different groups proposed. The second categorization is according to field namely Process Systems Engineering (PSE) and Energy Economics (EE). We use the following criteria to illustrate the differences: the nature of variables, theoretical underpinnings, level of technological aggregation, spatial and temporal scales, and model purposes. Traditionally, the Process Systems Engineering approach models the technological characteristics of the energy system endogenously. However, the energy system is situated in a broader economic context that includes several stakeholders both within the energy sector and in other economic sectors. Complex relationships and feedback effects exist between these stakeholders, which may have a significant impact on strategic, tactical, and operational decision-making. Leveraging the expertise built in the Energy Economics field on modeling these complexities may be valuable to process systems engineers. With this categorization, we present the interactions between the two fields, and make the case for combining the two approaches. We point out three application areas: (1) optimal design and operation of flexible processes using demand and price forecasts, (2) sustainability analysis and process design using hybrid methods, and (3) accounting for the feedback effects of breakthrough technologies. These three examples highlight the value of combining Process Systems Engineering and Energy Economics models to get a holistic picture of the energy system in a wider economic and policy context. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy systems; modeling and simulation; multi-scale systems engineering; sustainable process design; energy economics; top-down models; hybrid Life Cycle Assessment energy systems; modeling and simulation; multi-scale systems engineering; sustainable process design; energy economics; top-down models; hybrid Life Cycle Assessment
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Subramanian, A.S.R.; Gundersen, T.; Adams, T.A., II. Modeling and Simulation of Energy Systems: A Review. Processes 2018, 6, 238.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Processes EISSN 2227-9717 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top