Next Article in Journal
Editorial on the Special Issue “Non-Thermal Technologies in Food Science”
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Biodiesel Production in a Continuous Tubular Reactor with a Static Mixer
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Insight into the Degradation of Sunscreen Agents in Water Treatment Using UV-Driven Advanced Oxidation Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine from Aqueous Solutions Under Fenton-Assisted Electron Beam Treatment

1
Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland
2
Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(12), 2860; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122860
Submission received: 22 November 2024 / Revised: 3 December 2024 / Accepted: 11 December 2024 / Published: 13 December 2024

Abstract

Challenges in the treatment and removal of recalcitrant emerging organic pollutants in wastewater prompt the development of advanced oxidative processes (AOPs). Hydroxyl radicals are non-specific and capable of reacting with a diverse range of pollutants of emerging concern. In this study, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was removed from aqueous solutions with removal efficiencies between 80 and 90%. The presence of H2O2, humic acid, and other inorganic ions negatively influenced the degradation efficiency. However, the presence of S2O82− was found to increase the removal efficiency, which was attributed to the formation of SO4•− in addition to •OH radicals. Additionally, Fenton-assisted electron beam treatment showed an improved removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ with an average improvement of ≈10% at doses between 0.5 to 2.0 kGy in addition to the total organic carbon and chemical oxygen demand reduction. The H2O2 concentration and molar ratio of H2O2: Fe2+ influenced the removal capacity of the Fenton-assisted electron beam process. A degradation mechanism for HCQ has been proposed based on the reactions of •OH radicals and eaq.

1. Introduction

The future of wastewater decontamination is progressively deviating from the passive sequestration of pollutants, commonly practiced in conventional treatment plants, to the active and intentional destruction of pollutants in advanced wastewater treatment technologies. These initiatives are perpetuated by the realization that most pollutants are recalcitrant, persistent, degradation-resistant, bioaccumulative, toxic, and inadequately managed by current technologies. Additionally, conventional wastewater treatment methods sustain a phase transfer process that results in secondary pollution in the sludge, biosolids, manure, membrane filters, and used adsorbents [1]. Constructed wetlands (CWs) prominently used in wastewater treatment remove more than 50% of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). However, macrophytic biomass recovered from CWs and repurposed in pulp and paper industries or biofuel production still contains these pharmaceuticals [2]. Furthermore, the use of chemicals for decontamination is of environmental concern. Biological, chemical, physical, and physicochemical wastewater treatment has been investigated in addition to methods for the detection of low-concentration pollutants [3,4,5]. Alternative advanced oxidative processes play a crucial role in the development of sustainable and efficient wastewater treatment practices. These processes rely on the generation of highly reactive radicals that initiate the destruction of organic pollutants present in wastewater.
The risk associated with pharmaceutically active compounds and their metabolites in wastewater cannot be underscored. Pharmaceuticals released from industry, hospitals, and domestic sewage have been detected in wastewater pre- and post-treatment. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a synthetic quinoline derivative with anti-malarial and anti-inflammatory properties and is extensively used in oncology, rheumatology, and dermatology. Quinoline and its derivatives are associated with persistence, toxicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenic properties. HCQ is primarily excreted via the renal route with 23–25% of it in unmodified form alongside its metabolites [6]. HCQ causes hemotoxicity, oxidative damage, and histopathological alterations in Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) [7], with other notable effects in aquatic wildlife [8]. HCQ has three nitrogen atoms in its chemical structure, with pKa values of 4.0, 8.3, and 9.7. However, only high values can be protonated, affecting its permeability in cell membranes’ intracellular distribution [9]. HCQ is lipophilic (Kow value: 3.84) with water solubility up to 26.1 mg/L and tends to effectively bind to tissues and is, therefore, highly distributed in blood and plasma [10]. Its water solubility presents a great risk for the species that inhabit the aquatic ecosystems [3]. Therefore, the removal and fate of HCQ and its metabolites as model pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) are of interest in wastewater treatment. Absorption technologies, photodegradation, and advanced oxidative processes including gamma and EB irradiation have been studied to remove HCQ [11].
Ionizing radiation effectively degrades a variety of recalcitrant organic pollutants, such as antibiotics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and phenols in water and wastewater. Electron beam (EB) technology is a novel AOP with the added advantages of no secondary pollution or demand for additional chemicals. EB technology has been investigated for the degradation of recalcitrant organic pollutants in water and wastewater [12,13]. EB technology has been capable of reducing the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of wastewater before reverse osmosis (RO) membrane separation [13]. The gamma irradiation treatment of 100 mg/L HCQ aqueous solutions achieved a TOC removal efficiency of 98.5% after an 8 kGy absorbed dose, synonymous to complete HCQ mineralization at a dose rate of 26.31 Gy min−1, and pH  =  6.2. A low initial pollutant concentration, higher dose rate, and neutral pH favored the process [14]. Additionally, gamma irradiation achieved complete degradation of 20 mg/L HCQ at a 1 kGy dose with complete mineralization [15]. Kabasa et. al. [11] studied the dependence of HCQ removal on the initial concentration, the pH of the aqueous solution, and the absorbed dose under EB treatment. In this study, EB irradiation was used in the degradation of aqueous solutions containing HCQ. Additionally, the EB coupled with Fenton oxidation was investigated to improve the efficiency of HCQ removal, reduce energy consumption compared with EB treatment [11], and reduce chemical reagent consumption compared with the Fenton process. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are not many studies on the EB–Fenton process [16,17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Hydroxychloroquine sulfate powder (>99%), hydrogen peroxide (30%), ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (>99%), potassium dichromate (99%), methanol HPLC grade (>99.9%), sodium hydroxide (99%), silver nitrate (99%), acetonitrile HPLC grade (>99.9%), dibasic sodium phosphate (98%), sodium nitrate (99%), humic acid sodium salt, sodium persulfate (98%), orthophosphoric acid (98%), triethylamine (99.5%), sulfuric acid (95%), sodium hydrogen carbonate (99.5%), sodium carbonate (99.5%), and perchloric acid (95%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Hamburg, Germany). Fresh solutions of HCQ and other solutions were prepared in distilled water from the Thermo-Fischer distillation unit from Merk (Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Analytical Techniques

A Jasco V670 spectrophotometer from Jasco (Krakow, Poland) alongside a VIS II spectrophotometer from Macherey Nagel (Dueren, Germany) together with a Shimadzu class VP HPLC with a DAD detector was used for the detection of HCQ with maximum absorption at 343 nm. The mobile phase of the HPLC method consisted of 70% acetonitrile and 30% 1.4 g/L dibasic sodium phosphate with 0.4% triethyl amine at pH 3.0. The column was a Gemini NX 5U (Phenomenex, Tianjing, China) c19 110A 250 × 4.6 mm operated at an oven temperature of 40 °C and flow rate of 1 mL/min. LC-MS was performed on an Agilent LC-MS (Agilent Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) in positive mode electron spray ionization. The mobile phase consisted of deionized water with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (phase A) and acetonitrile and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (phase B). The gradient washing procedure was 20% solvent B (0–0.2 min), 20 to 50% B (0.2–1.5 min), 50–90% B (1.5–1.6 min), 90 to 100% B (1.6–2.0 min), 100% B (2.0–2.5 min), 100 to 20% B (2.5–2.6 min), and 20% B (2.6–3.5 min). The flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min, and the wavelength was 220 nm.
Different parameters were used to assess the degradation of HCQ. Nanocolor test kits purchased from Aqua Tests (Warsaw, Poland) were used for photometric determination of total Kjeldhal nitrogen (1.0–16 mg/L), total nitrogen (0.5–50 mg/L), nitrate (NO3), NH4+ (0.2–8 mg/L), Cl (0.5–50 mg/L), total organic carbon (20–300 mg/L), organic acids (30–3000 mg/L), and chemical oxygen demand (50–300 mg/L) using the Nanocolor VIS II spectrophotometer (AQUA LAB, Warsaw, Poland). The CX-461 multimeter from Elmetron (Zabrze, Poland) was used to measure the pH and temperature of the solution before and after irradiation, and the dissolved oxygen was measured using a DO meter from Mettler Toledo (Warsaw, Poland).

2.3. Radiation Processing

Irradiation was performed using a batch system under the ILU6 accelerator, which is located at the Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland. Irradiation was carried out with a beam energy of 1.65 MeV, a pulse frequency of 2 Hz, and a current of 50 mA. The absorbed dose was determined by the pulse frequency and irradiation time. The absorbed dose was measured using 0.0005 M potassium dichromate solution with 0.001 M silver dichromate, and all solutions were prepared in 0.1 M perchloric acid. Alanine solution and alanine pellet dosimeters were also used to assess the absorbed doses between 0.5 kGy and 7 kGy. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) sleeve bags were filled with 35 mL of solution to obtain an approximately 1.5 cm depth of liquid and were placed 30 cm below the accelerator window for irradiation. Fenton-assisted EB processing was achieved by preparing different Fe2+: H2O2 molar ratios and adding them to the HCQ solution before irradiation. Control experiments for the H2O2 and Fe2+ solutions were also made to determine the effect of each Fenton reagent. All experiments were performed in ambient conditions (STP) without adjusting pH unless otherwise stated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Degradation of HCQ Under EB Irradiation

Free radicals generated in the aqueous environment interact with HCQ and control its stability, degradation, and fate in the environment [6]. Alternatively, radicals generated in wastewater treatment processes propagate the destruction and removal of HCQ from wastewater. The interaction of high-energy EB radiation with water leads to the generation of ionized water molecules, excited water molecules, and presolvated electrons according to the following expression:
H 2 O   H 2 O + ,   H 2 O * ,   e  
Subsequent physicochemical and chemical reactions lead to the production of reactive radical species alongside ionized molecules and stable products. The corresponding radiation chemical yields (G-values) are provided in parenthesis in units of molecules/100 eV in the expression below.
H 2 O   H 2 O 2 2.6 ,     O H 2.7 ,     H 3 O + ,   H 0.6 ,     e a q ( 2.7 )
The reactions of the hydrated electrons ( e a q ) and hydroxyl radical (•OH) with HCQ in aqueous solution are the key reactions leading to its degradation [18]. Similar conclusions were made in gamma irradiation studies [14,15].

3.1.1. Dose Effects on the Degradation of HCQ

A pulse radiolysis study showed that OH radicals are the primary species reacting with HCQ, whereas the hydrated electron (eaq) played a minor role according to the rate constants in Equations (1) and (2). Rath et al. [19] proposed the formation of transient species in reactions of HCQ with the •OH radicals, with the [HCQ+] cation and the [HCQ: OH] adduct with the cation decaying slower than the OH adduct.
C 18 H 27 N 3 O C l + e a q   C 18 H 27 N 3 O + C l       2.0 × 10 9   M 1 s 1
C 18 H 27 N 3 O C l + O H   C 18 H 26 N 3 O C l + H 2 O       9.5 × 10 9   M 1 s 1
Zaouak et al. suggested the •OH attack led to the dealkylation of the aromatic ring and breaking of the C-N bond in the aliphatic tertiary amine and subsequent formation of 7-chloro-4-quinolinamine and 1-(N-ethyl-N-hydroxy-methylene-amino)-4-aminopentane [14]. Eventually, O H attacks 7-chloro-4-quinolinamine and breaks the C–Cl bond leading to the formation of 4-Amino-7-hydroxy-benzo pyridine accompanied by the release of chloride ions [15,19]. The reactions of the eaq and •OH radicals drive the dechlorination process leading to the release of Cl. The initial concentration of HCQ photometrically observed at 343 nm reduced with a corresponding increase in the absorbed dose from 0 to 2 kGy (Figure 1). The overall decrease in HCQ was 75% of the initial concentration at 2 kGy. The degradation of HCQ under EB irradiation was further evaluated under different irradiation conditions. Similar results were obtained in a previous study, with the efficiency increasing with a decreasing initial concentration of HCQ [11].

3.1.2. HCQ Degradation Under •OH, eaq, H•, and Aerated Conditions

The solutions of HCQ were subjected to different solvent conditions that allowed the selective generation of reactive species. The solutions were aerated by bubbling the solution with air (N2(80%)-O2(20%)) to increase dissolved O2 concentration. In water radiolysis, O2 effectively scavenges eaq and H• radicals resulting in a reduction in eaq and H• yields and an increase in less powerful and slowly reacting HO2 and O2•− yields (Equations (3) and (4)). Although the presence of these radicals enhances degradation, the presence of dissolved O2 also suppresses degradation [20]. Although the presence of these radicals enhances degradation, the presence of dissolved O2 also suppresses degradation [20]. The removal efficiency in aerated and Ar-saturated solutions where the dissolved oxygen was <1 mg/L was not significantly different (Figure 2).
H• + O2 → HO2   k = 1.27 × 1010 M−1 .s−1
eaq + O2 → O2•− + H+ → HO2 k = 1.84 × 1010 M−1 .s−1
The selective generation of •OH radicals was achieved in solutions saturated with N2O gas. N2O scavenges eaq to form •OH radicals (Equation (5)). The highest removal of efficiency for HCQ under EB irradiation was in conditions favoring •OH generation (Figure 2).
H2O+ eaq +N2O → N2 + OH + •OH
The contribution of the eaq was studied in Ar gas-saturated solutions containing 0.5 M tert-butanol at pH > 2. Tert-butanol scavenges the •OH (Equation (6)) and H• radicals, and all reactions were assumed to be exclusively from eaq.
•OH + (CH3)3COH → H2O + (CH3)2(CH2)COH
Under these conditions, the removal of HCQ was lower than in other conditions investigated for doses between 0.5 and 4.0 kGy (Figure 2). This is attributed to the rate constant for reactions of eaq with HCQ, which are comparatively much lower compared to those of the •OH. The reaction of H• was studied in Ar-purged solutions with 0.5 M tert-butanol at a pH < 2 where the eaq is converted into H• by reactions with H+ (Equation (7)).
eaq + H+ → H•
The removal of HCQ is observed to be intermediate between that of the •OH radicals and the eaq (Figure 2). Therefore, the removal of HCQ under EB irradiation is influenced by different solvent conditions that favor the selective generation of radicals. Conditions that favor the generation of •OH radicals give the highest removal efficiency for HCQ in aqueous solutions compared to eaq. In addition to irradiation conditions, the presence of several inorganic ions as well as organic constituents of natural water are known to influence the action of irradiation in treating aqueous solutions.

3.1.3. Effects of Inorganic Ions, H2O2, and Humic Acid

Both the carbonate and bicarbonate ions scavenge water radiolysis products leading to the formation of the carbonate radical anion that is less reactive toward organic pollutants according to Equation (8) and Equation (9), respectively. The HCO3 is a more efficient scavenger of •OH radicals compared to eaq (k = 1.0 × 106 M−ls−1), while the CO32− is a better scavenger of the •OH radicals [21]. The HCQ removal efficiency decreased with increasing concentrations of CO32− and HCO3 (Figure 3).
C O 3 2 + O H C O 3 + O H             k = 3.8 × 10 8   M 1 s 1
H C O 3 + O H C O 3 + H 2 O             k = 8.5 × 10 6   M 1 s 1
In natural waters, nitrates and nitrites are produced from the degradation of nitrogen-containing organic material. The determination of organic nitrogen (total Kjeldhal nitrogen) is an important process in water treatment, as nitrogenous waste poses a substantial threat to aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, the presence of nitrogen species also affects water treatment. NO3 ions are reduced to NO2 by scavenging eaq. NO2 reacts with the •OH and promotes the addition of NO2 to aromatic solutes that may lead to the formation of nitrogen disinfection byproducts that are a challenge in wastewater treatment [22,23]. Additionally, NO2 scavenges eaq less effectively than the •OH [24,25]. Additionally, NO2 scavenges eaq less effectively than the •OH [24,25]. The NO3 anion reacts with both the eaq (Equation (10)) and the H atom (Equation (11)), but the reaction with the latter is slower [26].
N O 3 + e a q N O 3 2             k = 9.7 × 10 9   M 1 s 1
N O 3 + H H N O 3             k = 1.4 × 10 6   M 1 s 1
The degradation of HCQ declined with an increasing NO3 concentration at a 2 kGy dose (Figure 3). NO3 ions at very low concentrations inhibit the action of water radiolysis products and have been used in the laboratory to shield H2O2 from attack by eaq, which is a major reaction leading to the generation of •OH radicals.
Persulfate activation is important in the generation of strongly oxidizing SO4•− radicals (E(SO4•−/SO42−) = 2.43 V). Different methods are experimentally used to achieve this activation. In the current experiment, EB irradiation generated SO4•− radicals at different concentrations of Na2S2O8, and the effect on HCQ degradation was investigated. The persulfate reacts with eaq to generate SO4•− radicals (Equation (12)). Additionally, reactions of SO4•− lead to further production of •OH radicals that would enhance removal efficiency (Equations (13) and (14)).
S 2 O 8 2 + e a q 2 S O 4
S O 4 + H 2 O     O H + H + + S O 4 2       k = 6.5 × 10 7   M 1 s 1
S O 4 + O H   O H + S O 4 2       k = 6.5 × 10 7   M 1 s 1
The removal of HCQ was higher in solutions containing persulfate and increased with an increasing concentration of persulfate (Figure 3). To investigate the contribution of SO4•− radicals on HCQ degradation, solutions containing 0.5 M tert-butanol were used. Solutions with 0.5 M tert-butanol and 2 mM persulfate (tBuOH/ SO4•−) where it is assumed SO4•− radicals are the predominant species had higher removal efficiencies (Figure S1). The removal efficiency was higher compared to solutions containing 2 mM persulfate and also solutions where reactions of the eaq dominated (tBuOH). Overall, solutions with persulfate had higher removal for HCQ compared to the EB process.
H2O2 and Fe2+ are commonly used Fenton reagents to generate •OH. In radiolysis, H2O2 is produced and is a precursor for •OH radicals. H2O2 decomposes in the presence of cations present in wastewater to further generate •OH radicals. Solutions of HCQ were mixed with either H2O2 or ferrous sulfate at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 2 mM and irradiated under an EB accelerator at doses ranging from 0.5 kGy to 7 kGy. The removal efficiency of the HCQ concentrations was observed to be lower in solutions containing either H2O2 or Fe2+ compared to the solutions without any additives (Figure 3). The reduction in removal efficiency was more pronounced with increasing concentrations of Fe2+. Radiolysis in the presence of excess H2O2 leads to the generation of the perhydroxyl radical ( H O 2 · ), which is a weaker oxidant compared to the •OH radical. The increasing concentration of Fe2+ also increases the turbidity. Additionally, competition between these additives and the target pollutant (HCQ) for the reactive species impacts the overall efficiency of the process. Even though H2O2 is produced during the radiolysis of water and expected to react in Fenton/Fenton-like processes with Fe2+ present in the solution, this was not observed. The concentrations of H2O2 needed for the effective Fenton process are between 50 and 80 ppm [13]. However, other studies using Fe2+ concentrations between 0.1 and 0.6 mM indicate an enhanced degradation of a 20 mg/L solution of sulfamethazine by gamma irradiation at a dose of 1 kGy [27].
The presence of dissolved organic matter in wastewater influences wastewater treatment. In photodegradation studies, dissolved organic matter (DOM) was a possible source of •OH and a sink for •OH radicals [28]. Humic acid (HA) had synergistic effects on atrazine degradation under gamma irradiation [29]. In contrast, 0.1 mM of humic acid suppressed the degradation of diclofenac at 1 kGy gamma irradiation [30]. In the present study, humic acid with increasing concentration led to a decrease in the removal efficiency of HCQ under EB irradiation (Figure 3).

3.2. Degradation of HCQ by Fenton Oxidation

Fenton and Fenton-like processes are important for the generation of •OH radicals that are non-specific and highly reactive oxidants. The ratio of concentrations of H2O2:Fe2+ is important in sustaining the Fenton reaction and the eventual degradation of organic contaminants. Heterogenous catalysis is deemed advantageous over homogenous catalysis in overcoming the limitations of cost, limited operational pH, sludge generation, and catalyst recovery. Furthermore, Fenton oxidation provides high performance, non-toxicity, and simplicity with the convenience of operating at room temperature and atmospheric pressure to achieve the desired oxidation of organics [31]. In this experiment, the initial concentrations of H2O2 ranged from 0.1 to 2 mM, with H2O2:Fe2+ molar ratios adjusted to a range between 0.2 times and 20 times. The removal efficiency of HCQ improved with increasing H2O2 concentration and was highest at a 2 mM H2O2 concentration for all molar ratios (Figure 4).
Generally, in conditions with higher proportions of H2O2 compared to Fe2+, the removal efficiency was higher. This is mainly because Fe2+ is the catalyst, and H2O2 is the oxidant and dominant source of OH radicals. When the 2 mM H2O2 concentration was 20 times (20×) the ferrous concentration, the highest removal efficiency of 78% was achieved after 3 hrs reaction time (Figure 4).
Insufficient H2O2 decreases removal efficiency due to a deficiency of OH generated by H2O2 decomposition. However, excess H2O2 may scavenge the OH radicals and reduce efficiency (Equation (15)). Additionally, the less powerful perhydroxyl radical reduces efficiency, but in some instances, it enhances efficiency.
OH + H 2 O 2     H 2 O + H O 2 ·
Conversely, H2O2 has negative implications on COD, BOD, and microorganisms present in biological treatment while inadvertently increasing cost. The important parameters pH, H2O2 dosage, catalyst dosage, and temperature affect Fenton and Fenton-like processes. The heterogeneous Fenton-like processes are found more effective at a pH of 3. However, neutral conditions (even alkaline conditions) could still achieve better treatment efficiency. These observations are mainly due to the different solubilities of a metal ion (such as the Fe ion) on the surface of a catalyst and the different activities of active sites on the catalyst surface. The pH 2.5–3.0 is regarded as optimum for the degradation of most organic compounds under homogeneous Fenton-like processes. At pH < 2.5, the scavenging effect of the OH radicals by H+ (Equation (16)) becomes stronger [17,31]. At pH > 3.0 the hydrolysis and precipitation of Fe3+ in the solution can reduce the catalytic capacity [32]. This pH range has also been reported to favor the degradation of various organic chemicals of interest [11].
OH + H+ + e ⟶ H2O

3.3. Degradation of HCQ by Fenton-Assisted EB Process

Fenton and ozonation processes are widely used AOPs in the treatment of industrial wastewater. The harsh operational conditions (e.g., pH of about 3) of the Fenton process limits its practical application. Moreover, large amounts of H2O2 and Fe2+ required in the Fenton process result in the generation of iron-containing sludge, which necessitates further treatment, removal, and disposal. Moreover, large amounts of H2O2 and Fe2+ required in the Fenton process result in the generation of iron-containing sludge, which necessitates further treatment, removal, and disposal. Similarly, in the ozonation process, the low solubility, low mass transfer of ozone, and high operation cost limit its practical application [13]. However, synergistic effects in the simultaneous applications of two or more AOPs show improved efficiency in the removal of pollutants. EB treatment (EB) is versatile and adaptive in incorporating other treatment processes to complement it. These can be completed either pretreatment, simultaneously, or post-EB. Pretreatment using an EB has been shown to enhance the biological treatment of refractory organic pollutants [33,34]. Fenton-like processes were chosen in the context of this study utilizing the generation of highly reactive •OH from the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 in the presence of Fe2+ (Equation (17)) alongside the •OH radicals generated during water radiolysis.
Fe2+ + H2O2 ⟶Fe3+ + OH + OH
Fe 3 + + H 2 O 2     Fe 2 + + H O 2 + H +
The slower back reaction (Equation (18)) limits the number of ferrous ions in the solution, and by utilizing the eaq generated in water radiolysis, the conversion of Fe3+ to Fe2+ can be accelerated (Equation (19)).
e a q + F e 3 + F e 2 +
Solutions of HCQ with selected molar ratios of Fenton reagents were subjected to EB irradiation. Each of the solutions contained H2O2 concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 2 mM and adjusted so that the concentration of the H2O2 was 0.2 to 20 times the concentration of the ferrous salt. The highest removal efficiency of ≈94% was obtained with a H2O2 concentration of 2 mM, which was 20 times (20×) the ferrous concentration at a 2 kGy applied dose (Figure 5).
The removal of HCQ under the Fenton-assisted EB process was faster compared to EB at doses between 0.5 and 2 kGy (≈10% improvement Figure S2). At higher ratios of H2O2:Fe2+ (5× to 20×), the removal efficiency increased with increasing H2O2 concentrations. However, at higher ratios of Fe2+ (0.5× to 0.2×), the removal efficiency decreased with the increasing ferrous sulfate concentrations. In high H2O2 concentrations, •OH radicals are more readily available from both the Fenton process and EB. On the other hand, increasing Fe2+ ratios caused scavenging and affected the turbidity of the solution.
It is asserted that, under Fenton-assisted EB, the Fe2+ consumed (Equation (17)) is regenerated following the reduction of Fe3+ according to Equation (19). These reactions sustain the Fenton process and lead to the generation of more •OH radicals. This enhances the removal efficiency compared to the conventional EB. Additionally, the self-quenching of reactive species, such as •OH and eaq, decreased due to the reaction between eaq and H2O2 (Equation (20)). The eaq reacts with H2O2 (~1010 M−1s−1) to produce •OH, which increases the concentration of •OH.
e a q + H 2 O 2 O H + O H
The electrochemical oxidation (EO) of HCQ with initial concentrations in the range of 36–250 mg/L using a boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode in aqueous solution (j = 20 mA/cm2, initial pH = 7.1, T = 25 °C, 0.05 M Na2SO4) achieved 100% reduction in the initial HCQ concentration. The removal efficiency was found to be faster at lower HCQ concentrations [19]. However, the complete removal of 2.88 × 10⁴ M (125 mg/L) HCQ was achieved after 300 min, which is a comparatively longer time compared to EB and Fenton-assisted EB process. In contrast to the Fenton-assisted EB process, electrochemical oxidation generated •OH at the anode through the electrolysis of a suitable electrolyte. Additionally, H2O2 is generated through the cathodic reduction of O2, and the presence of Fe2+ further enhanced the generation of •OH radicals through Fenton reactions. Furthermore, the presence of Na2SO4 leads to the generation of S2O82− and SO4•− that have higher reduction potentials, as previously explained in Figure 3. Similar to the Fenton-assisted EB process, the removal efficiency of HCQ under EO increased with increasing concentrations of H2O2 and Fe2+ but was suppressed when the concentrations exceeded an optimum. Similar to the Fenton-assisted EB process, the removal efficiency of HCQ under EO increased with increasing concentrations of H2O2 and Fe2+ but was suppressed when the concentrations exceeded an optimum.

4. Degradation Evaluation of HCQ Under Fenton-Assisted EB Process

Physical/chemical changes in the irradiated samples allude to changes in the initial composition of the samples. Parameters such as pH, dissolved oxygen, chloride ions in solution, total nitrogen, total Kjeldhal nitrogen, nitrates, ammonium ions, total organic carbon, and chemical oxygen demand are used to assess the efficiency of the treatment process. Furthermore, these parameters are indicators of the degradation mechanism. Additionally, products of HCQ degradation have been assessed using the LC-MS technique, and a mechanism for the degradation of HCQ has been proposed.

4.1. Changes in pH During HCQ Removal

The pH of the solutions was evaluated before and after radiolysis. The solutions containing H2O2 had an initial pH of 5.5 before irradiation. The pH was reduced to a stable pH of 3.5 at the end of irradiation. Increasing the concentration of H2O2 from 0.1 to 2 mM did not alter the initial pH of the HCQ solution (Figure S3A). However, the ferrous sulfate solution's initial pH dropped with the ferrous salt concentration increasing from pH 5 at 0.1 mM to pH 3.6 at 2 mM. With EB irradiation, the pH at all concentrations of the ferrous sulfate went to a stable final pH of 3.5 (Figure S3B) similar to results under normal EB without either Fenton reagents [11]. The reduction in pH has been attributed to the formation of organic acids (Figure 6a). Similar changes in pH under electro-Fenton oxidation of HCQ solution have been attributed to the formation of oxalic and oxamic acids [19], while the degradation of diuron under ionizing radiation is attributed to the formation of ketones and aldehydes [35]. The radiation-induced degradation of HCQ under gamma irradiation led to the formation of several products including oxamic and oxalic acids [14]. Similar products have been identified in the electro-Fenton process [19]. The oxidative decomposition of byproducts through •OH radical attack opening aromatic rings leads to the production of carboxylic acids. The carboxylic acids are slowly oxidized and require the consumption of a high irradiation dose to be mineralized into carbon dioxide and water.
During the Fenton-assisted EB process, the pH of the solutions ranged between 3 and 3.5 upon the addition of the Fenton reagents and maintained this pH after irradiation. The change in pH is attributed to the ferrous salt (FeSO4). Characteristically, Fenton oxidation is more favorable in acidic conditions at pH values ranging between 2 and 3. At pH > 5, insoluble Fe3+ precipitates increase turbidity while also competing for reactive radicals [17]. The solution pH has an influential role in the oxidation potential of the •OH [36]. At pH 0, E0 = 2.8 V, whereas at pH 14, E0 = 1.59 V, meaning that at low pH values, the reactions of OH are dominant. Additionally, the rate of decomposition of H2O2 at pH >4 is low, leading to a lower OH production, and H2O2 decomposes into H2O and O2. Furthermore, pH also affects the formation of water radiolysis products. An acidic pH favors the formation of H• atoms, whereas strongly basic conditions favor the generation of eaq from reactions of the OH and OH. Therefore, these conditions will influence the reactions leading to the degradation of target pollutants.

4.2. Cl Generation

Dehalogenation and degradation technology for highly toxic substances is an important strategy in water purification [37]. Studies focus on dehalogenation, but no effective technique has been described [38]. Chemical dehalogenation methods convert the halogenated compounds to less toxic dehalogenated compounds, in contrast to incineration for the disposal of such compounds [39]. Dissociative electron attachment, as shown in Equation (1), is accompanied by the release of chloride ions (Cl). Under Fenton-assisted EB (EB-F) treatment, the total Cl ion release at 2 kGy was higher compared to the EB process (Figure 6b). Similar dechlorination has been reported while using gamma radiation [14].
Dissociative electron attachment is a common reaction of the eaq with halogenated compounds. The evaluated rate constants for this reaction with HCQ have been provided in Equation (1) [18]. The chlorine group is presumed to be responsible for the toxicity of chlorinated organic compounds. The dechlorination of HCQ, therefore, implies a decrease in the toxicity of the aqueous solution [40]. The rate of dechlorination under EB-F was greater than for EB for all the doses. This imparts superior capability to the Fenton-assisted EB-supported process. Other than reactions involving the eaq, dechlorination occurred under the action of the •OH radical (Figure 6b). The direct substitution of a Cl atom by OH is believed to be a key reaction in this process [35]. In studies on the dechlorination of chlorobenzene, it was observed that highly substituted benzenes had a higher rate of degradation and dehalogenation compared to singly substituted benzenes [38].

4.3. Nitrogen

Nitrogen-containing organic wastewater is a challenge in wastewater treatment. The nitrogen atom incorporated in the cyclic ring of quinolone increases hydrophilicity, good solubility, and low biodegradation [6,41]. About 75% nitrification was achieved during the EB radiolysis of a solution of HCQ at an applied dose of 7 kGy (Table 1). The total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) was reduced with a simultaneous increase in NO3 with an increasing applied irradiation dose as expected in the successful nitrification of nitrogen-containing organic wastewater.
Organic nitrogen present in wastewater is converted into inorganic nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium) at the end of the treatment process. In aerobic conditions, ammonium is utilized as a nutrient by microorganisms and further oxidized into nitrite and eventually into nitrate. The concentration of NH4+ in the solution increased with the increasing irradiation dose (Table 1). The formation of NH4+ was faster and higher under the Fenton-assisted EB process compared to the EB process.

4.4. Chemical Oxygen Demand

Dissolved oxygen (DO) represents the oxygen dissolved in water and is available to living aquatic organisms. The dissolved oxygen is consumed as organic matter decays. In high levels of organic pollution, BOD, or COD, a large amount of DO is consumed through aerobic microorganisms to decompose the organic matter, which causes a reduction in the DO level. The dissolved oxygen during the Fenton-assisted EB (EB-F) degradation of the solution of HCQ showed a slight decrease (Figure S4). The concentration of dissolved oxygen increases with increasing molar ratios of Fenton reagents. Several reactions (Equations (21)–(24)) were proposed for this increase in molecular oxygen in Fenton reactions [20,42].
HO2 + H2O2 → O2 + H2O + •OH
Fe3+ + HO2 → Fe2+ + O2 + H+
HO2 + •OH → O2 + H2O
2HO2 → O2 + H2O2
The complete mineralization of target pollutants was evaluated using the oxygen demand. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total organic carbon (TOC) measure oxygen demand in polluted water. The TOC and COD slightly decreased with increasing absorbed doses during the EB process (Table 1). This reduction was further improved by the EB-F treatment. The decrease in the COD and TOC during the irradiation process is indicative of the transformation of the initial compound into other organic degradation products such as organic acids (Figure 6a). These products are less susceptible to oxidation by initial water radiolysis products and require additional processing time to decompose.
Similar TOC elimination was reported under the electrochemical oxidation of HCQ [19]. The lower removal efficiency was attributed to the production of carboxylic acids and aliphatic chains that were more refractory than the initial HCQ. The observed radiolytic decomposition of 100 mg/L HCQ under gamma irradiation increased COD and TOC elimination with an increasing absorbed dose with the removal efficiency >90% at doses up to 8 kGy [14]. Complete mineralization of 20 mg/L HCQ was achieved under gamma irradiation at 3 kGy with no intermediates being detected [15]. The level of mineralization was dependent on the initial pollutant concentration, possibly due to the generation of higher degradation intermediate concentrations that scavenge the reactive radicals. A similar dependence of removal efficiency on HCQ concentration was previously reported [11]. Additionally, the contact time is an important variable in the treatment process. A longer contact time results in higher TOC and COD reduction as in the case of gamma radiolysis. Zaouak et al. (2022) also demonstrated that higher dose rates gave higher removal efficiency under gamma irradiation owing to reduced self-combination of reactive species [14]. However, EB has comparatively higher dose rates compared to gamma irradiation. The mineralization under gamma irradiation can be ascribed to the longer contact time.

4.5. Degradation Products of HCQ Degradation Under EB Irradiation

LC-MS analysis was performed to determine the degradation products following the EB irradiation of HCQ. The [M+H]+ peak for HCQ was observed at m/z = 336 with mass fragments at m/z = 292, m/z = 247, and m/z = 74 (Figure S5A). Other additional mass fragments were identified and recorded in a similar analysis [14,15,43]. In this study, the degradation products of HCQ were identified at m/z 352, 175, 308, 334, and 370 as shown in Table 2 (Figure S5A–F).
The formation of new peaks with increasing irradiation from 0.5 kGy to 2 kGy is shown from the chromatograms in Figure S6 and the decrease in the MS intensity of HCQ with an increasing absorbed dose and the formation of degradation products (Figure S7). Photodegradation products of HCQ have previously been reported as N-dehydroxyethyl-7-dechloro-7-hydroxy HCQ (m/z 274), dechlorinated HCQ (m/z 302), N-dealkylated HCQ (m/z 179), HCQ N-oxide (m/z 352) HCQ, and desethylhydroxychloroquine (m/z 308) [44]. Additionally, under gamma irradiation, degradation products such as HCQ N-oxide (m/z 352), m/z 174, and m/z 262 were reported [15]. Furthermore, products with m/z 174, m/z 179, and m/z 161 have been reported also under gamma radiolysis of aqueous solutions of HCQ [14]. Bensalah et al. obtained m/z = 179 and 175 following α dealkylation of HCQ under electrochemical oxidation.
The irradiation of HCQ in water or isopropanol identified desethyl-chloroquine (m/z 292), desethanolhydroxychloroquine (m/z 308), and a third product, which is HCQ without the N-C4H10O at the tertiary amine [45]. Chonker et al. also identified compounds m/z 292, m/z 308, m/z = 263, and 339 as metabolites of HCQ. Three degradation products m/z 292, m/z 324, and m/z = 364 with lower retention times than HCQ have also been reported in photodegradation studies on HCQ. The formation of compounds m/z 292 and m/z 324 detected during irradiation experiments result from the shortening of the side chain on the nitrogen atom, by the loss of ethene from HCQ to yield desethylhydroxychloroquine, or by primary double shortening of the side chain on the nitrogen [46].
The Ecological Structure Activity Relation software v2.2 was used to predict the acute and chronic toxicity of HCQ and its degradation products on fish, daphnia, and green algae based on the EU-Directive 93/67/EEC [47]. The compounds are classified as highly toxic (LC50 and EC50 < 1 mg/L), toxic (LC50 and EC50 1 to 10 mg/L), harmful (LC50 and EC50 10–100 mg/L), and harmless (LC50 and EC50 > 100 mg/L). HCQ (m/z 336) was highly toxic to fish, daphnia, and green algae when considering chronic toxicity but was toxic to daphnia and green algae when considering acute toxicity (Figure 7). The degradation products with m/z 179, 175, and 334 were predicted to be harmless to fish but were classified as harmful to daphnia and green algae. Except for m/z 292, most of the degradation products of HCQ were less toxic than the HCQ parent with respect to acute and chronic toxicity.

4.6. Degradation Mechanism for HCQ

Mathematical abstractions propose multiple sites of the •OH attack on the HCQ molecule. However, the •OH addition to the aromatic ring is thermodynamically favored based on Gibbs free energy [48]. Furthermore, the addition reactions of •OH to both the benzene and pyridine rings of quinoline are energetically favorable with reaction energies ranging from 18.6 to 23.9 kcal/mol to form OH adducts in water [49]. The formation of similar OH adducts has been reported in the gamma radiolysis of HCQ [14].
The degradation of HCQ is proposed to proceed via the OH addition to the aromatic ring that leads to the formation of m/z 370, 352, 279, and 334, as shown in the degradation scheme in Figure 8. Additionally, α dealkylation of the aromatic ring leads to the formation of m/z 179 and 175. N-dealkylation at the tertiary nitrogen is likely to lead to the formation of several products with m/z 308, 292, and 279. Dehalogenation is additionally a prominent reaction of most halogenated organic species, as previously discussed [40]. Dechlorination occurs through dissociative electron attachment reactions involving the eaq or direct substitution of the Cl atom by the OH in addition to reactions involving the aromatic ring [35].
The main products that were detected in the current study are m/z 370, 292, 308, 352, 175, and 334 alongside the inorganic nitrates, ammonium, and chloride species. All organic by-products are proposed to undergo oxidative decomposition through the •OH radical attack opening aromatic rings to form carboxylic acids and releasing inorganic nitrogen species predominantly in the form of NO3 and NH4+ [14]. The carboxylic acids are then slowly mineralized to CO2 [19].

5. Conclusions

The degradation of 2.88 × 10−4 M (125 mg/L) HCQ under EB irradiation achieved >70% degradation at 2 kGy. The synergistic application of Fenton reagents provided additional •OH that improved efficiency by 18%, from 76% to 94%. Compared with the sole Fenton process, the consumption of H2O2 (2 mM) and Fe2+ (0.1 mM) was less, and the removal efficiency of HCQ was improved by 18% compared with the sole EB irradiation. Furthermore, the self-quenching of reactive species, such as •OH and eaq, was decreased, while additionally, the eaq accelerated the reduction of Fe3+ into Fe2+. The release of Cl, N O 3 , and N H 4 + was better under EB-F compared to EB. Additionally, COD and TOC reduction were higher in EB-F.
EB processing is faster than gamma [14,15] or Fenton processing, which usually takes longer, an hour or more. In this work, we investigated higher concentrations of HCQ (125 mg/L) using EB irradiation. It is very well known that the lower the initial concentration of the pollutant (as low as 20 ppm [15]), the higher the removal efficiency. The EB process is capable of performing both the degradation of organic compounds as well as the disinfection of the irradiated volume without the use of chemical additives, which is desired in wastewater treatment processes. Additionally, the EB is capable of handling copious volumes of wastewater, i.e., 1000 m3 of dye effluents [50], 10,000 m3/day of wastewater [51], and 645 m3/day of sludge [52]. Therefore, other than the initial cost of the installation of the facility, EB is promising in the treatment of effluents. Some studies postulated the cost of EB treatment to be more cost-effective than conventional methods, including certain AOPs [53]. However, a complex wastewater matrix poses a challenge in efficiency as the components compete for reactive species. EB can be integrated alongside the Fenton process for better efficiency as has been shown in the present study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr12122860/s1, Figure S1: Effects of S2O82− solutions on EB treatment of 2.88 × 10−4 M solution of HCQ; Figure S2: Comparison of the removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M HCQ under EB and Fenton-assisted EB (EB-F) with added 2 mM H2O2 which is 20 times the Fe2+ concentration; Figure S3: Changes in pH of solutions containing different concentrations of (A) H2O2 and (B) Fe2+; Figure S4: Changes in dissolved oxygen concentration during EB and Fenton-assisted EB degradation of 2.88 × 10−4 M HCQ using 2 mM H2O2 at different molar ratios; Figure S5: MS Spectrum for the identified degradation products of HCQ under the Fenton-assisted EB process; Figure S6: LCMS chromatogram of the degradation of HCQ at different doses; Figure S7: MS intensity of proposed HCQ degradation products at different irradiation doses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision: Y.S.; Investigation: S.K., S.B. and S.W.; Data curation and formal analysis: S.K. and S.W.; Writing—original draft preparation: S.K.; Writing—review and editing: Y.S. and J.W.; Funding acquisition: Y.S. and J.W.; Resources: Y.S. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is financed by the IAEA Coordinated Research Project (contract no. 23165/R0), National Center for Research and Development, Poland-China Cooperation Program, acronym TAPEB “Advanced treatment of typical antibiotic pharmaceutical wastewater using electron beam irradiation” under contract number (WPC3/2022/68/TAPEB/2024) and the Key Program for Intergovernmental S&T Innovative Cooperation Project of China (2024YFE0101700).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Tarazona, J.V.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, M.A.; Anadón, A. Environmental impact assessment of COVID-19 therapeutic solutions. A prospective analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, S.; Pratap, B.; Dubey, D.; Kumar, A.; Shukla, S.; Dutta, V. Constructed wetlands for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: Origin, impacts, treatment methods, and SWOT analysis. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Merma Chacca, D.E.; Maldonado, I.; Vilca, F.Z. Environmental and ecotoxicological effects of drugs used for the treatment of COVID 19. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monsef, R.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Electrochemical sensor based on a chitosan-molybdenum vanadate nanocomposite for detection of hydroxychloroquine in biological samples. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pushpanjali, P.A.; Manjunatha, J.G.; Hareesha, N.; Girish, T.; Al-Kahtani, A.A.; Tighezza, A.M.; Ataollahi, N. Electrocatalytic Determination of Hydroxychloroquine Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Modified Carbon Nanotube Paste Electrode. Top Catal. 2022, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dabić, D.; Babić, S.; Škorić, I. The role of photodegradation in the environmental fate of hydroxychloroquine. Chemosphere 2019, 230, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sayed, A.E.D.H.; Hamed, M.; Soliman, H.A.M. Spirulina platensis Alleviated the Hemotoxicity, Oxidative Damage and Histopathological Alterations of Hydroxychloroquine in Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. da Luz, T.M.; da Araújo, C.A.P.; Estrela, F.N.; Braz, H.L.B.; Jorge, R.J.B.; Charlie-Silva, I.; Malafaia, G. Can use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19 affect aquatic wildlife? A study conducted with neotropical tadpole. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Derendorf, H. Excessive lysosomal ion-trapping of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 106007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alves da Silva, A.E.; de Abreu, P.M.B.; Geraldes, D.C.; de Oliveira Nascimento, L. Hydroxychloroquine: Pharmacological, physicochemical aspects and activity enhancement through experimental formulations. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 102512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kabasa, S.; Sun, Y.; Bułka, S.; Chmielewski, A.G. Degradation of hydroxychloroquine in aqueous solutions under electron beam treatment. Nukleonika 2024, 69, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Hu, J.; He, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Hu, D.; Lin, J. Treatment of hospital wastewater by electron beam technology: Removal of COD, pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, C.; He, S.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y. First full-scale application of electron beam technology for treating dyeing wastewater (30,000 m3/d) in China. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 196, 110136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zaouak, A.; Jebali, S.; Chouchane, H.; Jelassi, H. Impact of gamma-irradiation on the degradation and mineralization of hydroxychloroquine aqueous solutions. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 20, 6815–6824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boujelbane, F.; Nasr, K.; Sadaoui, H.; Bui, H.M.; Gantri, F.; Mzoughi, N. Decomposition mechanism of hydroxychloroquine in aqueous solution by gamma irradiation. Chem. Pap. 2022, 76, 1777–1787. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11696-021-01969-1 (accessed on 27 October 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bracamontes-Ruelas, A.R.; Reyes-Vidal, Y.; Irigoyen-Campuzano, J.R.; Reynoso-Cuevas, L. Simultaneous Oxidation of Emerging Pollutants in Real Wastewater by the Advanced Fenton Oxidation Process. Catalysts 2023, 13, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, S.; Wang, J. Electron Beam Technology Coupled to Fenton Oxidation for Advanced Treatment of Dyeing Wastewater: From Laboratory to Full Application. ACS ES&T Water 2022, 2, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bensalah, N.; Midassi, S.; Ahmad, M.I.; Bedoui, A. Degradation of hydroxychloroquine by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rath, M.C.; Keny, S.J.; Upadhyaya, H.P.; Adhikari, S. Free radical induced degradation and computational studies of hydroxychloroquine in aqueous solution. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2023, 206, 110785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, N.N.; Ding, L.; Bei, H.F.; Zheng, S.Y.; Han, B. The role of dissolved oxygen in Fenton system. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 012084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bettoli, M.G.; Ravanelli, M.; Tositti, L.; Tubertini, O.; Guzzi, L.; Martinotti, W.; Queirazza, G.; Tamba, M. Radiation induced decomposition of halogenated organic compounds in water. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1998, 52, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marussi, G.; Vione, D. Secondary formation of aromatic nitroderivatives of environmental concern: Photonitration processes triggered by the photolysis of nitrate and nitrite ions in aqueous solution. Molecules 2021, 26, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Y.; Bu, L.; Duan, X.; Zhu, S.; Kong, M.; Zhu, N.; Zhou, S. Mini review on the roles of nitrate/nitrite in advanced oxidation processes: Radicals transformation and products formation. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yamamoto, Y.I.; Suzuki, T. Ultrafast Dynamics of Water Radiolysis: Hydrated Electron Formation, Solvation, Recombination, and Scavenging. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 5510–5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chappuis, F.; Grilj, V.; Tran, H.N.; Zein, S.A.; Bochud, F.; Bailat, C.; Incerti, S.; Desorgher, L. Modeling of scavenging systems in water radiolysis with Geant4-DNA. Phys. Medica 2023, 108, 102549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hiroki, A.; Pimblott, S.M.; Laverne, J.A. Hydrogen peroxide production in the radiolysis of water with high radical scavenger concentrations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 9352–9358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, J. Fe2+ enhancing sulfamethazine degradation in aqueous solution by gamma irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014, 96, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vione, D.; Falletti, G.; Maurino, V.; Minero, C.; Pelizzetti, E.; Malandrino, M.; Ajassa, R.; Olariu, R.I.; Arsene, C. Sources and sinks of hydroxyl radicals upon irradiation of natural water samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3775–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, J.A.; Shah, N.S.; Khan, H.M. Decomposition of atrazine by ionizing radiation: Kinetics, degradation pathways and influence of radical scavengers. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 156, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhuan, R.; Wang, J. Degradation of diclofenac in aqueous solution by ionizing radiation in the presence of humic acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 234, 116079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, N.; Zheng, T.; Zhang, G.; Wang, P. A review on Fenton-like processes for organic wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 762–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mirzaei, A.; Chen, Z.; Haghighat, F.; Yerushalmi, L. Removal of pharmaceuticals from water by homo/heterogonous Fenton-type processes—A review. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 665–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bojanowska-Czajka, A. Application of radiation technology in removing endocrine micropollutants from waters and wastewaters—A review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 12032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bojanowska-Czajka, A. Decomposition of diclofenac in sewage from municipal wastewater treatment plant using ionizing radiation. Nukleonika 2021, 66, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kovács, K.; He, S.; Mile, V.; Csay, T.; Takács, E. Wojnárovits, Ionizing radiation induced degradation of diuron in dilute aqueous solution. Chem. Cent. J. 2015, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jung, Y.S.; Lim, W.T.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, Y.H. Effect of pH on Fenton and Fenton-like oxidation. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mackenzie, K.; Kopinke, F.D.; Remmler, M. Reductive destruction of halogenated hydrocarbons in liquids and solids with solvated electrons. Chemosphere 1996, 33, 1495–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, M.; Shi, W.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Wang, J.; Ding, G.; Fu, J. Degradation of halogenated benzenes in solution by electron beam irradiation method. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Perrone, L.; Prati, L.; Rossi, M. Removal of chlorinated organic compounds from water by catalytic dehydrohalogenation. Appl. Catal. B 1998, 15, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Makarov, I.E.; Ponomarev, A.V. Radiation-Induced Degradation of Organic Compounds and Radiation Technologies for Purification of Aqueous Systems. Ioniz. Radiat. Eff. Appl. 2018, 83–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Babić, S.; Dabić, D.; Ćurković, L. Fate of hydroxychloroquine in the aquatic environment. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes, Greece, 31 August–2 September 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  42. Santos-Juanes, L.; Sánchez, J.L.G.; López, J.L.C.; Oller, I.; Malato, S.; Pérez, J.A.S. Dissolved oxygen concentration: A key parameter in monitoring the photo-Fenton process. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 104, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saim, S.; Behira, B. Impact of Chloroquine as treatment of pandemic COVID-19 on environment. Mater. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 4, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  44. Saini, B.; Bansal, G. Characterization of four new photodegradation products of hydroxychloroquine through LC-PDA, ESI-MSn and LC-MS-TOF studies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 84, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tønnesen, H.H.; Grislingaas, A.L.; Woo, S.O.; Karlsen, J. Photochemical stability of antimalarial. I. Hydroxychloroquine. Int. J. Pharm. 1988, 43, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, D.; Pan, F.; Ruan, H.; Sun, N. A study of impurities in the repurposed COVID-19 drug hydroxychloroquine sulfate using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-solid-phase extraction-nuclear magnetic resonance. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2022, 36, e9358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Reuschenbach, P.; Silvani, M.; Dammann, M.; Warnecke, D.; Knacker, T. ECOSAR model performance with a large test set of industrial chemicals. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1986–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sanches-Neto, F.O.; Coutinho, N.D.; Aquilanti, V.; Silva, W.A.; Carvalho-Silva, V.H. Mechanism and Kinetics of the Degradation of Nitazoxanide and Hydroxychloroquine Drugs by Hydroxyl Radicals: Theoretical Approach to Ecotoxicity. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2023, 34, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nicolaescu, A.R.; Wiest, O.; Kamat, P.V. Radical-induced oxidative transformation of quinoline. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, B.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Choi, J.S.; Makarov, I.E.; Ponomarev, A.V. Electron beam treatment of textile dyeing wastewater: Operation of pilot plant and industrial plant construction. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Han, B.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, Y.; Choi, J.S.; Jeong, K.Y. Operation of industrial-scale electron beam wastewater treatment plant. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1475–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kurucz, C.N.; Waite, T.D.; Cooper, W.J. The Miami Electron Beam Research Facility: A large scale wastewater treatment application. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1995, 45, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, L.; Wang, S.; Chen, W.; Lin, J.; Yu, X.; Feng, M.; Wan, K. Removal of Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances by Electron Beam and Plasma Irradiation: A Mini-Review. Water 2022, 14, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chromatogram for 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ solution observed at 343 nm at EB doses ranging from 0 to 2 kGy.
Figure 1. Chromatogram for 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ solution observed at 343 nm at EB doses ranging from 0 to 2 kGy.
Processes 12 02860 g001
Figure 2. Effects of different reactive species and conditions on the degradation of HCQ in aqueous solution.
Figure 2. Effects of different reactive species and conditions on the degradation of HCQ in aqueous solution.
Processes 12 02860 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different inorganic ions, H2O2, and humic acid (HA).
Figure 3. Effect of different inorganic ions, H2O2, and humic acid (HA).
Processes 12 02860 g003
Figure 4. Fenton removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ under different molar concentrations of H2O2 and ferrous ion after 3 h reaction time.
Figure 4. Fenton removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ under different molar concentrations of H2O2 and ferrous ion after 3 h reaction time.
Processes 12 02860 g004
Figure 5. Removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ under EB irradiation and Fenton-assisted EB process at different molar ratios of H2O2 to Fe2+.
Figure 5. Removal of 2.88 × 10−4 M of HCQ under EB irradiation and Fenton-assisted EB process at different molar ratios of H2O2 to Fe2+.
Processes 12 02860 g005
Figure 6. (a) Formation of organic acids during irradiation of HCQ solutions; (b) release of Cl ion during the degradation of 2.88 × 10−4 M solution of HCQ under EB, Fenton-assisted EB treatment, action of •OH, and eaq.
Figure 6. (a) Formation of organic acids during irradiation of HCQ solutions; (b) release of Cl ion during the degradation of 2.88 × 10−4 M solution of HCQ under EB, Fenton-assisted EB treatment, action of •OH, and eaq.
Processes 12 02860 g006
Figure 7. Toxicity analysis of HCQ and degradation products.
Figure 7. Toxicity analysis of HCQ and degradation products.
Processes 12 02860 g007
Figure 8. Proposed degradation scheme of Fenton-assisted EB processing of HCQ in aqueous solution.
Figure 8. Proposed degradation scheme of Fenton-assisted EB processing of HCQ in aqueous solution.
Processes 12 02860 g008
Table 1. Variation in NO3, NH4+, TKN, TOC, and COD with increasing dose under EB and EB-F processes.
Table 1. Variation in NO3, NH4+, TKN, TOC, and COD with increasing dose under EB and EB-F processes.
Dose
(kGy)
NO3
(mg/L)
NH4+
(mg/L)
TKN
(mg/L)
TOC
(mg/L)
COD
(mg/L)
EBEB-FEBEB-FEBEB-FEBEB-FEBEB-F
0000011.0811.973.5073.50149.00149.00
0.55.990.820.242.045.706.6469.7564.00145.67112.00
16.798.360.422.665.173.766962.33144.67107.67
27.688.40.652.844.044.1666.2559.88136106.67
48.168.880.652.813.364.1668.959.60136.67105.67
78.489.221.052.792.653.6668.6759.42136.67103.33
TKN—total Kjeldahl nitrogen; TOC—total organic carbon; COD—chemical oxygen demand.
Table 2. m/z values of proposed degradation products based on LC-MS results.
Table 2. m/z values of proposed degradation products based on LC-MS results.
m/zChemical FormulaFragmentRetention Time (min)
336C18H26ClN3O[M+H]+1.41
370C18H26ClN3O3M + 2OH1.1
352C18H27ClN3O2M + OH8.39
334C18H26N3O3M + 2OH − Cl1.36
308C16H21ClN3OM − CH2CH31.87
175C₉H21N2OM − C₉H8NCl1.11
M = C18H26ClN3O.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kabasa, S.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Bulka, S. Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine from Aqueous Solutions Under Fenton-Assisted Electron Beam Treatment. Processes 2024, 12, 2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122860

AMA Style

Kabasa S, Wang S, Sun Y, Wang J, Bulka S. Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine from Aqueous Solutions Under Fenton-Assisted Electron Beam Treatment. Processes. 2024; 12(12):2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122860

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kabasa, Stephen, Shizong Wang, Yongxia Sun, Jianlong Wang, and Sylwester Bulka. 2024. "Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine from Aqueous Solutions Under Fenton-Assisted Electron Beam Treatment" Processes 12, no. 12: 2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122860

APA Style

Kabasa, S., Wang, S., Sun, Y., Wang, J., & Bulka, S. (2024). Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine from Aqueous Solutions Under Fenton-Assisted Electron Beam Treatment. Processes, 12(12), 2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122860

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop