Development of Experimental Techniques for the Phase Equilibrium Study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System Involving Gas, Slag, Matte, Lead Metal and Tridymite Phases
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- (i)
- Closed experiments—in sealed silica ampoules under an argon atmosphere;
- (ii)
- Semi-open experiments—in silica ampoules in a fixed CO/CO2/SO2/Ar gas mixture (all gases 99.999% purity, supplied by Coregas, Yennora, Australia).
- (i)
- Analysis of the effect of equilibration time,
- (ii)
- Examination of the homogeneity of the equilibrium phases,
- (iii)
- Evaluation of the effect of the direction of approach toward the equilibrium point, and
- (iv)
- Investigation of the behavior of the system through systematic analysis and identification of the elementary reactions occurring during the equilibration and their effects on the achievement of equilibrium, which are specific to the system under investigation.
3. Systematic Analysis of the Elementary Reactions
3.1. Systematic Analysis of the Reactions Taking Place during Equilibration in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System
- The inter-phase mass transfer schematic diagram summarizes the key elements of mass transfer and key reactions (Figure 4 and Figure 7). The major elements comprising each phase, the key elements that can transfer between the phases, the key reactions between phases that are expected to be important, and the limiting factors that may block those reactions are identified for all combinations of the II- and III- phase assemblages (gas, slag, matte, metal), and separately—for the II-7 slag—tridymite phase assemblage.
- The compositional change direction diagram shows the direction of compositional changes in key phases for each reaction (Figure 5 and Figure 8). For each type of experiment (closed and open), possible changes of the matte and slag compositions are plotted on the Pbmatte vs. Pbslag, and PbO-“FeO”-SiO2 diagrams, and the vectors of the compositional changes corresponding to each reaction are indicated on those diagrams.
- The micro/macro location diagram identifies the typical locations where the reactions take place within the samples (Figure 6 and Figure 9). The classification of the different typical micro- and macro-locations of the gas, slag, matte, metal, and solid phases in the sample relative to each other and to the position in the sample (e.g., relative to the gas-condensed phase interface or the sample-substrate interface) are summarised to facilitate the systematic analysis of the reactions using the EPMA measurements of compositional profiles and trends. The classification is based on the following criteria:
- (i)
- The locations of the slag, matte, and metal phases relative to each other and relative to their positions within the sample (close to the substrate or to the gas-condensed phase interface),
- (ii)
- The morphology (shape) of the matte and metal particles, and
- (iii)
- Size of the matte and metal phases.
- (i)
- Systematically analyzing the compositional changes/profiles at the micro- and macro-scales using EPMA;
- (ii)
- Identifying the possible reactions taking place between phases and within phases;
- (iii)
- Linking the expected and actual measured experimental points relative to equilibrium values in different phases to identify and confirm the reactions taking place during equilibration, and, therefore,
- (iv)
- Introducing modification and improvements to the experimental methodology; and finally,
- (v)
- Confirming the achievement of equilibrium.
- -
- The macro-inhomogeneities are usually identified on the scale from ~50 µm to several millimeters across the sample relative to the gas-condensed interface, between large phases (>100 µ) or relative to the substrate interfaces, and
- -
- The micro-inhomogeneities are usually identified on the scale ~5–50 µm across one phase (e.g., slag) relative to the distance from the phase boundaries.
3.2. Reactions Taking Place during Closed System, Slag-Matte–Lead Metal-Tridymite Equilibration
- Slag–matte—II.4.a: FeS (mat) + PbO (sl) ↔ PbS (mat) + FeO (sl),
- Slag–metal—II.5.a: PbO (sl) + 2FeO (sl) ↔ 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met), limited by Fe2+/Fe3+ in slag,
- Matte–metal—II.6.a: PbS (mat) ↔ Pb (met) + [S] (met), limited by S in metal,
- Slag–tridymite—II.7: SiO2 (solid) ↔ SiO2 (sl), adjusting toward the tridymite liquidus,
- Slag–matte–metal—III.4.c: FeS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met) ↔ PbS (mat) + 3FeO (sl), and
- III.4.d: PbS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met) ↔ FeS (mat) + FeO (sl) + 2PbO (sl).
3.3. Reactions Taking Place during Open System, Slag–Matte–Metal–Tridymite Equilibration
- Gas–slag—II.1.b Oxidation/reduction of slag 2FeO1.5 (sl) + CO (g) ↔ 2FeO (sl) + CO2 (g),
- II.1.c PbO (sl) + CO (g) ↔ Pb (g) + CO2 (g),
- II.1.g 2FeO (sl) + PbO (sl) ↔ Pb (g) + 2FeO1.5 (sl), limited by Fe2+/Fe3+ in slag,
- Gas–matte—II.2.c. Evaporation PbS (mat) ↔ PbS (g), unlimited, continuous,
- Slag–matte—II.4.a FeS (mat) + PbO (sl) ↔ PbS (mat) + FeO (sl),
- Slag–tridymite—II.7. SiO2 (solid) ↔ SiO2 (sl), adjusting toward tridymite liquidus,
- Gas–slag–matte—III.1.a PbS (mat) + 3 CO2 (g) ↔ PbO (sl) + SO2 (g) + 3 CO (g),
- III.1.b FeS (mat) + 3 CO2 (g) ↔ FeO (sl) + SO2 (g) + 3 CO (g),
- III.1.c PbS (mat) + 6FeO1.5 (sl) ↔ PbO (sl) + 6FeO (sl) + SO2 (g), and
- III.1.d FeS (mat) + 6FeO1.5 (sl) ↔ 7FeO (sl) + SO2 (g).
4. Development of Experimental Methodology for the Slag/Matte/Metal/Tridymite (Closed System)
- Pb in both matte and slag decreases as equilibration time progresses, as shown in Figure 11; that may occur due to the vaporization of Pb inside the ampoule followed by re-condensation of Pb droplets in the upper colder part of the ampoule.
- Figure 11a shows that the experimental points give the same trend as FactSage prediction, i.e., Pb in matte increases with increasing Pb in slag.
- Figure 11b,c shows that an increase of Pb in slag leads to a decrease of Fe and S in matte.
- Figure 11j shows the comparison of wt.% SiO2 in slag from experiments with the FactSage prediction. Both show increasing SiO2 in slag with increasing Pb in slag (>15%).
- The sulfur concentration in slag is found to decrease with increasing Pb in slag, as can be observed in Figure 11k.
5. Development of the Experimental Methodology for the Gas–Slag–Matte–Tridymite Semi-Open Equilibrium
5.1. Developing the Semi-Open Equilibration Techniques and Testing the Achievement of Equilibrium with the Well Investigated Cu-Fe-O-Si-S System
5.2. Compositional Movements at Short Reaction Times
6. Concluding Statements
- Analysis of reactions considering compositions of phases in terms of elements, stable chemical species, and other phase properties; this analysis includes the following steps/components:
- Constructing the interphase mass transfer schematic diagram summarising the mass transfer of key elements and key reactions;
- Summarising in one table all selected elementary reactions and reaction steps potentially taking place in the system;
- Constructing the compositional change direction diagram showing the direction of compositional changes in key phases for each reaction;
- Constructing the macro/micro-location diagram identifying the typical locations where the reactions take place within the samples;
- Short experiments followed by EPMA measurements of compositional profiles to identify macro- and micro-inhomogeneities and to identify and confirm the actual reactions taking place in the system;
- Longer experiments also followed by the EPMA measurements of macro- and micro-inhomogeneities trends;
- Modification of the experimental methodology to ensure the achievement of equilibria; and
- Continuous confirmation of achievement of equilibrium during the experimental program.
- -
- An extended study of Pb-Fe-Si-O-S at closed and open conditions;
- -
- Effect of copper (Cu-Pb-Fe-Si-O-S)
- -
- Effect of slagging elements (Al, Ca, Mg, Zn)
- -
- Distribution of other minor elements (As, Sn, Sb, Bi, Ag, Au, Ni) between slag, metal, and matte.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kolesnikov, A.S.; Naraev, V.N.; Natorhin, M.I.; Saipov, A.A.; Kolesnikova, O.G. Review of the processing of minerals and technogenic sulfide raw material with the extraction of metals and recovering elemental sulfur by electrochemical methods. Rasayan J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2420–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Shevchenko, M.; Shishin, D.; Hidayat, T.; Hayes, P.C. Characterization of phase equilibria and thermodynamics with integrated experimental and modelling approach for complex lead primary and recycling processing. In Proceedings of the PbZn 2020: 9th International Symposium on Lead and Zinc Processing, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–27 February 2020; pp. 337–349. [Google Scholar]
- Jak, E.; Hidayat, T.; Shishin, D.; Prostakova, V.; Shevchenko, M.; Hayes, P.C. Complex copper pyrometallurgy challenges and opportunities—Integrated Experimental Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamic Modelling Research and Implementation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Conference of Metallurgists Copper’2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–21 August 2019; p. 595879. [Google Scholar]
- Shishin, D.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Multicomponent thermodynamic databases for complex non-ferrous pyrometallurgical processes. In Proceedings of the Extraction 2018, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 26–29 August 2018; pp. 853–868. [Google Scholar]
- Shishin, D.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Development and applications of thermodynamic database in copper smelting. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Conference of Metallurgists Copper’2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–21 August 2019; p. 594861. [Google Scholar]
- Bale, C.W.; Belisle, E.; Chartrand, P.; Decterov, S.A.; Eriksson, G.; Gheribi, A.E.; Hack, K.; Jung, I.H.; Kang, Y.B.; Melancon, J.; et al. FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010–2016. CALPHAD 2016, 54, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Available online: www.factsage.com (accessed on 13 December 2022).
- Friedrich, K. Equilibrium diagrams of the systems: Lead sulphide-iron. Sulphide and lead sulphide-silver sulphide. Metallurgie 1907, 4, 479–485. [Google Scholar]
- Guertler, W.; Leitgebel, W. Observations in theoretical metallurgy. The system iron-lead-sulfur. Met. Erz 1926, 23, 439–442. [Google Scholar]
- Hewitt, R.L. Experiments bearing on relations of pyrrhotite to other sulphides. Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. Econ. Geol. 1938, 33, 305–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brett, R.; Kullerud, G. Fe-Pb-S system. Econ. Geol. 1967, 62, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eric, H.R.; Ozok, H. High-temperature phase relations and thermodynamics in the iron-lead-sulfur system. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1994, 25, 53–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E. Phase Equilibria to Characterise Lead/Zinc Smelting Slags and Sinters (PbO-ZnO-CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-FeO). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Jak, E.; Hayes, P.C.; Lee, H.-G. Improved methodologies for the determination of high temperature phase equilibria. Korean J. Miner. Mater. Inst. 1995, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Decterov, S.A.; Wu, P.; Hayes, P.C.; Pelton, A.D. Thermodynamic Optimisation of the Systems PbO-SiO2, PbO-ZnO, ZnO-SiO2 and PbO-ZnO-SiO2. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1997, 28, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Decterov, S.A.; Hayes, P.C.; Pelton, A.D. Thermodynamic Optimisation of the Systems CaO-Pb-O and PbO-CaO-SiO2. Can. Metall. Q. 1998, 37, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Liu, N.; Hayes, P.C. Experimental study of Phase Equilibria in the Systems PbOx-CaO and PbOx-CaO-SiO2. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1998, 29B, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Zhao, B.; Hayes, P.C.; Decterov, S.A.; Pelton, A.D. Coupled Experimental and Thermodynamic Modelling Studies of the System PbO-ZnO-FeO-Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 for Lead and Zinc Smelting. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Zinc and Lead Processing, Calgary, AL, Canada, 16–19 August 1998; pp. 313–333. [Google Scholar]
- Jak, E.; Zhao, B.; Liu, N.; Hayes, P.C. Experimental Study of Phase Equilibria in the System PbO-ZnO-SiO2. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1999, 30B, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Hayes, P.C. Experimental Study of Phase Equilibria in the PbO-ZnO-“Fe2O3”-CaO-SiO2 System in Air for High Lead Smelting Slags (CaO/SiO2 = 0.35 and PbO/(CaO + SiO2) = 5.0 by Weight). Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2002, 33B, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Hayes, P.C. Experimental Liquidus in the PbO-ZnO-“Fe2O3”-(CaO+SiO2) System in Air, with CaO/SiO2=0.35 and PbO/(CaO+SiO2)= 3.2. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2002, 33B, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Hayes, P.C. The effect of the CaO/SiO2 ratio on the phase equilibria in the ZnO-“Fe2O3”-(PbO + CaO + SiO2) system in air: CaO/SiO2 = 0.1, PbO/(CaO + SiO2) = 6.2, and CaO/SiO2 = 0.6, PbO/(CaO + SiO2) = 4.3. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2003, 34B, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E.; Zhao, B.; Harvey, I.; Hayes, P.C. Experimental study of phase equilibria in the PbO-ZnO-“Fe2O3”-(CaO + SiO2) system in air for the lead and zinc blast furnace sinters (CaO/SiO2 weight ratio of 0.933 and PbO/(CaO + SiO2) ratios of 2.0 and 3.2). Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2003, 34B, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevchenko, M.; Jak, E. Experimental Phase Equilibria Studies of the PbO-SiO2 System. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 2017, 101, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevchenko, M.; Jak, E. Experimental liquidus study of the binary PbO-ZnO and ternary PbO-ZnO-SiO2 systems. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 6795–6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevchenko, M.; Jak, E. Experimental Liquidus Studies of the Pb-Fe-Ca-O System in air. J. Phase Equilib. Diff. 2019, 40, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevchenko, M.; Jak, E. Experimental liquidus study of the binary PbO-CaO and ternary PbO-CaO-SiO2 systems. J. Phase Equilib. Diff. 2019, 40, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontainas, L.; Coussement, M.; Maes, R. Some metallurgical principles in the smelting of complex materials. In Proceedings of the Complex Metallurgy ‘78: Papers Presented at an International Symposium; Organized by GDMB, Gesell-schaft Deutscher Metallhütten- und Bergleute and the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Bad Harzburg, Germany, 20–22 September 1978; pp. 13–23. [Google Scholar]
- Fontainas, L.M.; Maes, R.H. A two-step process for smelting complex lead-copper-zinc materials. In Lead-Zinc-Tin ‘80: Proceedings of a World Symposium on Metallurgy and Environmental Control; Metallurgical Society of AIME: Englewood, CO, USA, 1979; pp. 375–393. [Google Scholar]
- Hidayat, T.; Fallah Mehrjardi, A.; Abdeyazdan, H.; Shishin, D.; Shevchenko, M.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Integrated experimental and thermodynamic modelling study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si system: Effect of P(SO2) on slag-matte equilibrium. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidayat, T.; Shevchenko, M.; Shishin, D. Experimental study of Pb-Cu-Fe-Si-O-S system: Slag-matte-metal-solid equilibria in the at closed conditions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 899–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Hidayat, T.; Shishin, D.; Shevchenko, M.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Integrated Experimental and Thermodynamic Modelling Study of Slag-Matte-Metal Equilibrium in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si-(Al, Ca, Zn) Systems at 1100–1200 °C. Submitt. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jak, E. Integrated experimental and thermodynamic modelling research methodology for metallurgical slags with examples in the copper production field. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, Beijing, China, 27–31 May 2012; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Hidayat, T.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Experimental Investigation of Gas/Slag/Matte/Tridymite Equilibria in the Cu-Fe-O-S-Si system in Controlled Gas Atmospheres: Development of Technique. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 3002–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Hidayat, T.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Experimental Investigation of Gas/Slag/Matte/Tridymite Equilibria in the Cu-Fe-O-S-Si system in Controlled Gas Atmospheres: Experimental Results at T = 1473 K [1200 °C] and P(SO2) = 0.25 atm. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 3017–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Hidayat, T.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Experimental investigation of gas/slag/matte/tridymite equilibria in the Cu-Fe-O-S-Si system in controlled gas atmospheres at 1200 °C and P(SO2) = 0.1 atm. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 110, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample | FeO | SiO2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Master slag | 63.4 | 36.3 | |
Sample | Pb | Fe | S |
Master matte Master metal | 62.6 | 17.9 | 19.5 |
98.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 |
Locations | Reactions | Closed | Open |
---|---|---|---|
I.1. Gas | (a) Mass transfer of gaseous species to/from the sample surface (in gas bulk or through film layer) | ||
(b) Reaction between gas species: | |||
i. CO2 (g) = ½ O2 (g) + CO (g) | + | ||
ii. SO2 (g) = O2 (g)+ ½S2 (g) | |||
iii. SO2 (g) + 2CO (g) = ½ S2 (g) + 2CO2 (g) | |||
I.2. Slag | (a) Diffusion of Pb, Fe2+, Fe3+, Si, S and O within liquid slag | + | + |
(b) Oxygen transfer through slag taking place by the ferric–ferrous couple: 2FeO (sl) + [O] (sl) = 2FeO1.5 (sl) | |||
I.3. Matte | Diffusion of Pb, Fe, O, and S within matte | ||
I.4. Metal | Diffusion of Pb, (Fe), O, and S within metal (Fe is very low) | ||
II.1. Gas–slag | (a) Adsorption/chemical reaction/desorption at gas–slag interface | ||
(b) Oxidation/reduction of slag 2FeO1.5 (sl) + CO (g) = 2FeO (sl) + CO2 (g) | + | ||
(c) PbO (sl) + CO (g) = Pb (g) + CO2 (g) (can be important since PPb > >PPbO—see Figure 1) | + | ||
Sulfurization/de-sulfurization of slag: | |||
(d) SO2 (g) + 3CO (g) + FeO (sl) = FeS (sl) + 3CO2 (g) | |||
(e) 7FeO (sl) + SO2 (g) = 6FeO1.5 (sl) + FeS (sl) | |||
Evaporation of slag component: | |||
(f) PbO (sl) = PbO (g) | |||
(g) 2FeO (sl) + PbO (sl) = Pb (g) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) | |||
II.2. Gas–matte | (a) Adsorption/chemical reaction/desorption at gas–matte interface | ||
(b) Oxygen and sulfur adsorption/dissolution in matte: | |||
i. ½ O2 (g) = [O] (mat) | |||
CO2 (g) = [O] (mat) + CO (g) | |||
ii. SO2 (g) = S (mat) + O2 (g) | + | ||
SO2 (g) + CO (g) = S (mat) + CO2 (g) | + | ||
½ S2 (g) = S (mat) | |||
(c) Evaporation of matte component: PbS (mat) = PbS (g) | + | ||
II.3. Gas–metal | (a) Adsorption/chemical reaction/desorption at gas–metal interface | ||
(b) Oxygen and sulfur adsorption/dissolution in metal: | |||
i. ½ O2 (g) = [O] (met) | |||
CO2 (g) = [O] (met) + CO (g) | + | ||
ii. SO2 (g) = S (met) + O2 (g) | |||
SO2 (g) + CO (g) = S (met) + CO2 (g) | + | ||
iii. Pb (met) + ½ O2 (g) = PbO (g) | |||
Pb (met) + CO2 (g) = PbO(g) + CO (g) | + | ||
iv. Pb (met) + SO2 (g) + 2CO (g) = PbS (g) + 2CO2 (g) | + | ||
(c) Evaporation of metal component: Pb (met) = Pb (g) | + | ||
(d) Pb (met) + S (met) = PbS (g) | |||
II.4. Slag–matte | (a) FeS (mat) + PbO (sl) = PbS (mat) + FeO (sl) | + | + |
(b) FeS (mat) = FeS (sl); PbS (mat) = PbS (sl) | |||
(c) 2FeO (sl) + [O] (mat) = 2FeO1.5 (sl) | |||
II.5. Slag–metal | (a) PbO (sl)+ 2FeO (sl) = 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met) | + | + |
(b) 2FeO1.5 (sl) + [Fe] (met) = 3FeO (sl) | |||
(c) 2FeO (sl) + [O] (met) = 2FeO1.5 (sl) | |||
II.6. Matte–metal | (a) Matte–metal exchange reactions PbS (mat) = Pb (met) + [S] (met) | + | + |
(b) FeS (mat) + Pb (met) = PbS (mat) + Fe (met) | |||
(c) cross-boundary diffusion S (mat) = [S] (met); [O] (mat) = [O] (met); Pb (mat) = Pb (met) | + | + | |
II.7. Slag–Tridymite | Dissolution/precipitation of tridymite into/from slag: SiO2 (solid) = SiO2 (sl) | + | + |
III.1. Gas–slag–matte | (a) PbS (mat) + 3CO2 (g) = PbO (sl) + SO2 (g) + 3CO (g) | + | |
(b) FeS (mat) + 3CO2 (g) = FeO (sl) + SO2 (g) + 3CO (g) | + | ||
Combined ab: αPbS (mat) + βFeS (mat) + 3(α + β)CO2 (g) = αPbO (sl) + βFeO (sl) + 3(α + β)CO (g) + (α + β)SO2 (g) | + | ||
(c) PbS (mat) + 6FeO1.5 (sl) = PbO (sl) + 6FeO (sl) + SO2 (g) | + | ||
(d) FeS (mat) + 6FeO1.5 (sl) = 7FeO (sl) + SO2 (g) | + | ||
(e) FeS (mat) + FeO1.5 (sl) = 2FeO (sl) + ½ S2 (g) | + | ||
III.2. Gas–slag–metal | (a) PbO (sl) + CO (g) = Pb (met) + CO2 (g) | + | |
(b) FeO (sl) + CO (g) = Fe (met) + CO2 (g) (Fe is very low) | |||
III.3. Gas–matte- Metal | (a) Pb (met) + 2CO (g) + SO2 (g) = PbS (mat) + 2CO2 (g) | ||
(b) Pb (met) + FeS(mat) = PbS (g) + Fe(met) (Fe is very low) | |||
III.4. Slag–matte–metal | (a) PbS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) = PbO (sl) + 2FeO (sl) + [S] (met) | ||
(b) FeS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) = 3FeO (sl) + [S] (met) | |||
(c) FeS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met) = PbS (mat) + 3FeO (sl) | + | + | |
(d) PbS (mat) + 2FeO1.5 (sl) + Pb (met) = FeS (mat) + FeO (sl) + 2PbO (sl) | + | + | |
IV.1. Gas–slag–matte–metal | 4-phase reactions (e.g., 3Pb (met) + SO2 (g) = PbS (mat) + 2PbO (sl)) are not important for the present study of the slag–matte–metal–tridymite and slag–matte–metal–tridymite systems | + | |
No direct reaction or mass exchange through IV.2. Gas–slag–matte–tridymite; IV.3. Gas–slag–metal–tridymite; IV.4. Gas–matte–metal–tridymite; or IV.5. Slag–matte–metal–tridymite is expected |
No | Initial Mixture | Equilib. Time | Phase | Metal Composition (wt.%) | Phase | Oxide Composition (wt.%) | Fe/SiO2 in Slag | Pb in Slag | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Fe | S | Si | PbO | FeO | S | SiO2 | |||||||
1 | F | 0.25 h | Matte | 64.8 | 17.4 | 17.6 | 0.08 | Slag | 23.9 | 45.7 | 3.8 | 26.5 | 1.34 | 22.2 |
Metal | 98.3 | 0.13 | 1.53 | 0.02 | Tridymite | >99 * | ||||||||
2 | F | 1 h | Matte | 63.8 | 18.2 | 17.7 | 0.10 | Slag | 22.9 | 46.7 | 4.0 | 26.2 | 1.38 | 21.3 |
Metal | 98.3 | 0.04 | 1.58 | 0.03 | Tridymite | >99 * | ||||||||
3 | F | 3 h | Matte | 60.0 | 21.0 | 18.7 | 0.12 | Slag | 20.2 | 49.5 | 4.4 | 25.8 | 1.49 | 18.7 |
Metal | 98.3 | 0.05 | 1.42 | 0.17 | Tridymite | >99 * | ||||||||
4 | E | 0.5 h | Matte | 38.2 | 39.8 | 21.5 | 0.37 | Slag | 15.6 | 54.9 | 5.7 | 23.8 | 1.79 | 14.5 |
Metal | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | Tridymite | >99 * |
Sample | Time, h | Direction | Phase | Matte-Slag Composition, wt.% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu/Cu2O | Fe/FeO | S | Si/SiO2 | Old Total | ||||
Cu2H | 0.5 | From high-matte grade | Matte | 73.9 | 4.8 | 21.2 | 0 | 103.0 |
Slag | 0.9 | 66.1 | 0.6 | 32.4 | 100.6 | |||
Cu2H | 3 | From high-matte grade | Matte | 70.7 | 7.3 | 22 | 0 | 102.6 |
Slag | 0.9 | 66.3 | 1 | 31.8 | 100.6 | |||
Cu2E | 0.5 | From exact-equilibrium-matte grade | Matte | 66.6 | 10.3 | 23.1 | 0 | 102.4 |
Slag | 0.8 | 66.5 | 1.1 | 31.5 | 101.3 | |||
Cu2E | 3 | From exact-equilibrium-matte grade | Matte | 64.2 | 12.6 | 23.2 | 0 | 100.9 |
Slag | 0.8 | 66.6 | 1.4 | 31.1 | 100.8 | |||
Cu2L | 0.5 | From low-matte grade | Matte | 57.6 | 18 | 24.3 | 0 | 100.7 |
Slag | 0.9 | 66.9 | 2 | 30.2 | 101.3 | |||
Cu2L | 3 | From low-matte grade | Matte | 60.1 | 15.7 | 24.2 | 0 | 101.6 |
Slag | 0.9 | 66.7 | 1.8 | 30.5 | 101.2 |
Mixture | Log pO2 | pSO2 | Time, h | Phase | Composition, wt.% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb/PbO | Fe/FeO | S | Si/SiO2 | Old Total | |||||
A | −8.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | Matte | 72.4 | 11.3 | 16.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
Slag | 34.0 | 37.4 | 3.1 | 25.5 | 105.3 | ||||
B | −8.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | Matte | 75.9 | 8.8 | 15.2 | 0.0 | 98.6 |
Slag | 41.1 | 28.7 | 2.0 | 28.1 | 104.4 | ||||
C | −8.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | Matte | 71.1 | 13.0 | 15.8 | 0.1 | 99.2 |
Slag | 35.1 | 35.6 | 2.7 | 26.6 | 104.6 | ||||
D | −8.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | Matte | 61.4 | 21.0 | 17.1 | 0.4 | 97.9 |
Slag | 30.3 | 42.0 | 4.2 | 23.4 | 105.5 | ||||
E | −8.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | Matte | 47.3 | 32.2 | 19.4 | 1.1 | 93.8 |
Slag | 25.9 | 47.9 | 6.7 | 19.5 | 105.7 | ||||
A | −8.3 | 0.6 | 3 | Matte | 59.7 | 22.7 | 17.1 | 0.46 | 97.7 |
Slag | 30.5 | 42.2 | 4.4 | 22.9 | 104.1 | ||||
A | −8.3 | 0.6 | 3 | Matte | 60.9 | 21.4 | 17.3 | 0.39 | 97.7 |
Slag | 30.6 | 41.4 | 4.5 | 23.6 | 104.8 | ||||
A | −8.3 | 0.6 | 3 | Matte | 59.6 | 22.8 | 17.1 | 0.44 | 97.7 |
Slag | 29.9 | 42.3 | 4.6 | 23.2 | 105.4 | ||||
E | Argon | n/a | 0.5 | Matte | 38.2 | 39.8 | 21.5 | 0.4 | 96.9 |
Slag | 15.6 | 54.9 | 5.7 | 23.8 | 105.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hidayat, T.; Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Shevchenko, M.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Development of Experimental Techniques for the Phase Equilibrium Study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System Involving Gas, Slag, Matte, Lead Metal and Tridymite Phases. Processes 2023, 11, 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020372
Hidayat T, Fallah-Mehrjardi A, Shevchenko M, Hayes PC, Jak E. Development of Experimental Techniques for the Phase Equilibrium Study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System Involving Gas, Slag, Matte, Lead Metal and Tridymite Phases. Processes. 2023; 11(2):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020372
Chicago/Turabian StyleHidayat, Taufiq, Ata Fallah-Mehrjardi, Maksym Shevchenko, Peter C. Hayes, and Evgueni Jak. 2023. "Development of Experimental Techniques for the Phase Equilibrium Study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System Involving Gas, Slag, Matte, Lead Metal and Tridymite Phases" Processes 11, no. 2: 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020372
APA StyleHidayat, T., Fallah-Mehrjardi, A., Shevchenko, M., Hayes, P. C., & Jak, E. (2023). Development of Experimental Techniques for the Phase Equilibrium Study in the Pb-Fe-O-S-Si System Involving Gas, Slag, Matte, Lead Metal and Tridymite Phases. Processes, 11(2), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020372