Next Article in Journal
Data Augmentation to Support Biopharmaceutical Process Development through Digital Models—A Proof of Concept
Next Article in Special Issue
Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium in Binary and Ternary Azeotropic Solutions Acetonitrile-Ethanol-Water with the Addition of Amino Esters of Boric Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Community Integrated Energy System Multi-Energy Transaction Decision Considering User Interaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immobilization of an Industrial β-Glucosidase from Aspergillus fumigatus and Its Use for Cellobiose Hydrolysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research and Performance Evaluation on Selective Absorption of H2S from Gas Mixtures by Using Secondary Alkanolamines

Processes 2022, 10(9), 1795; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091795
by Jingwen Xue 1,2, Chaoyue Yang 1,2, Jingqiang Fu 2,3, Jinlong He 1,2 and Jinjin Li 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2022, 10(9), 1795; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091795
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biochemical Processes for Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments are included in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1.     The authors should avoid the abbreviations in the abstract.

2.     In section 1, line 30, authors should avoid lumped references. They should extract the information from each reference. Please follow the same where applicable.

3.      It is better to include supplementary material in the main text and discuss it thoroughly to improve the manuscript.

4.     In section 4, the authors should support the findings with well-cited literature.

5.     The authors should compare the results with the literature.

 

6.     There are a total of 25 references and only one reference from 2021. The authors need to put in recent references.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The authors addressed all the raised comments satisfactorily. They Paper can be accepted for publication after a minor language check.

Author Response

We appreciate for the reviewer's kind comments on our manuscript. These comments have definitely helped us to improve the quality of this manuscript. According to your notices, we have made corresponding language corrections in the revised manuscript. Thanks again for your professional review.

Back to TopTop