Next Article in Journal
A Cleaner Delignification of Urban Leaf Waste Biomass for Bioethanol Production, Optimised by Experimental Design
Previous Article in Journal
Heat/PMS Degradation of Atrazine: Theory and Kinetic Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/pr10050942
Review Report
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Use of Banana Waste as a Source for Bioelectricity Generation

Processes 2022, 10(5), 942; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050942
by Segundo Rojas-Flores 1,*, Magaly De La Cruz-Noriega 1, Renny Nazario-Naveda 2, Santiago M. Benites 2, Daniel Delfín-Narciso 3, Luis Angelats-Silva 4 and Emzon Murga-Torres 4
Reviewer 1:
Ihsanullah Sohoo
Reviewer 2:
Daniel Ferrández
Processes 2022, 10(5), 942; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050942
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 2 May 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainable Energy Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and suggestions for authors are provided in attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear colleague, I hope you have a good day. The suggested changes have been made. Abstract 1. modified as reviewer suggest 2. modified as reviewer suggest Introduction 1. modified as reviewer suggest 2. modified as reviewer suggest 3. modified as reviewer suggest 4. modified as reviewer suggest best regards

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors propose an interesting topic that is in line with the Goals for Sustainable Development. This is futuristic research and should be taken into consideration for its contribution to improving the sustainability of the planet. Some minor revisions are attached to help researchers. The article deserves to be published.
Line 68 to 71, rewrite that sentence, it is not well understood.
Section 2 of Methodology and Materials should be expanded, perhaps some images of real experiments would help their understanding and improve the discussion. In addition, perhaps it is not necessary to abuse so many subsections.
In the results the size of the graphs must be increased, some are really difficult to interpret. Could the authors add an image of the experiment carried out?
Figure 4(a) is very cumbersome, the line thickness should be a little more careful.
The conclusions, although relevant, I think they can be expanded a little more indicating the implications of this research, its future lines of work and the possibilities of this technology in the future.

Author Response

Dear Colleague, the changes were made.
Only the Methodology and Materials part was not changed because the other reviewer suggested that it is fine. On the other hand, the thickness of the data in Fig. 4 (a) cannot be modified because the program gives it to me like this.
I hope you like this improved version.
best regards.
Good day

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop