Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Polygeneration Systems in Residential Applications: A Review of Technology, Energy Planning and Guidelines for Optimizing the Design
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Evolution of Residential Energy Supply Designs
2.1. Conventional Energy System Designs
2.2. Integrated Residential Energy System Designs
2.3. Advanced Residential Energy System Design
3. Energy Generation Systems
3.1. Single Power Generation Systems
3.2. Cogeneration System
3.3. Polygeneration System
4. Overview of Polygeneration Systems
4.1. Prime Mover
4.2. Heat Recovery Units
4.3. Cooling Units
4.4. Hydrogen Generation Units
4.5. Storage Units
5. Applications of SOFC-Based Energy Generation Systems in Residential Applications
6. Energy Planning for Designing a Polygeneration System
6.1. Evaluation of Configuration Design
6.2. Operational Strategy Design
6.3. Optimal Design of Polygeneration Systems
- (a)
- Size Optimization
- (b)
- Operating parameters optimization
7. Guidelines for Optimizing the Design of Polygeneration Systems
8. Summary
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ramadhani, F.; Hussain, M.; Mokhlis, H.; Fazly, M.; Ali, J.M. Evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based polygeneration system in residential areas integrating with electric charging and hydrogen fueling stations for vehicles. Appl. Energy 2019, 238, 1373–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadhani, F.; Hussain, M.A.; Mokhlis, H.; Illias, H.A. Two-stage fuzzy-logic-based for optimal energy management strategy for SOFC/PV/TEG hybrid polygeneration system with electric charging and hydrogen fueling stations. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2021, 13, 024301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luqman, M.; Ghiat, I.; Maroof, M.; Lahlou, F.-Z.; Bicer, Y.; Al-Ansari, T. Application of the concept of a renewable energy based-polygeneration system for sustainable thermal desalination process—A thermodynamics’ perspective. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 12344–12362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadhani, F.; Hussain, M.; Mokhlis, H.; Illias, H.A. Optimal heat recovery using photovoltaic thermal and thermoelectric generator for solid oxide fuel cell-based polygeneration system: Techno-economic and environmental assessments. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 181, 116015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giwa, A.; Yusuf, A.; Dindi, A.; Balogun, H.A. Polygeneration in desalination by photovoltaic thermal systems: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 130, 109946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokni, M. Analysis of a polygeneration plant based on solar energy, dual mode solid oxide cells and desalination. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 19224–19243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, U.; Kumar, R.; Pant, P.; Chaudhary, R. Development of an innovative polygeneration process in hybrid solar-biomass system for combined power, cooling and desalination. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 120, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarruel-Jaramillo, A.; Pérez-García, M.; Cardemil, J.M.; Escobar, R.A. Review of Polygeneration Schemes with Solar Cooling Technologies and Potential Industrial Applications. Energies 2021, 14, 6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linde, L. Implementation of BECCS in a Polygeneration System—A Techno-Economic Feasibility Study in the District Heating Network of Stockholm. Master Thesis, KTH Industrial Engineering and Management, Stockholm, Sweden, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, I.; Tester, J.W.; You, F. Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 109, 551–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parraga, J.; Khalilpour, R.; Vassallo, A. Polygeneration with biomass-integrated gasification combined cycle process: Review and prospective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 92, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, A.; Lahdelma, R. Role of polygeneration in sustainable energy system development challenges and opportunities from optimization viewpoints. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kwan, T.H.; Katsushi, F.; Shen, Y.; Yin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Kase, K.; Yao, Q. Comprehensive review of integrating fuel cells to other energy systems for enhanced performance and enabling polygeneration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 128, 109897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cigolotti, V.; Genovese, M.; Fragiacomo, P. Comprehensive Review on Fuel Cell Technology for Stationary Applications as Sustainable and Efficient Poly-Generation Energy Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 4963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baroutaji, A.; Arjunan, A.; Robinson, J.; Wilberforce, T.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Olabi, A.G. PEMFC Poly-Generation Systems: Developments, Merits, and Challenges. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Energy, USA. Chapter 5: Increasing Efficiency of Building Systems and Technologies; Department of Energy (DOE): Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
- International Energy Agency, I. Energy-Efficient Buildings: Heating and Cooling Equipment, in Technology Roadmap; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2011.
- Zaid, S.; Graham, P. The Need for Energy Efficiency Legislation in the Malaysian Building Sector. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Building Control Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wakui, T.; Yokoyama, R. Optimal sizing of residential SOFC cogeneration system for power interchange operation in housing complex from energy-saving viewpoint. Energy 2012, 41, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakui, T.; Wada, N.; Yokoyama, R. Feasibility study on combined use of residential SOFC cogeneration system and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle from energy-saving viewpoint. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 60, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jana, K.; Ray, A.; Majoumerd, M.M.; Assadi, M.; De, S. Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution—A comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 2017, 202, 88–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palsson, J.; Selimovic, A.; Sjunnesson, L. Combined solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine systems for efficient power and heat generation. J. Power Sources 2000, 86, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chachuat, B.; Srinivasan, B.; Bonvin, D. Adaptation strategies for real-time optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dicks, A.L.; Fellows, R.G.; Mescal, C.M.; Seymour, C. A study of SOFC–PEM hybrid systems. J. Power Sources 2000, 86, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.; Dincer, I.; Yilbas, B.S. Development, analysis and assessment of solar energy-based multigeneration system with thermoelectric generator. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 156, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Kong, W.; Dong, F.; Xu, H.; Chen, B.; Ni, M. Application of cascading thermoelectric generator and cooler for waste heat recovery from solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 148, 1382–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Xu, H.; Chen, B.; Dong, F.; Ni, M. Two-stage thermoelectric generators for waste heat recovery from solid oxide fuel cells. Energy 2017, 132, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.; Dincer, I.; Yilbas, B.S. Analysis and Assessment of A Biomass Energy-Based Multigeneration System with Thermoelectric Generators. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 10901–10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Rezgui, Y.; Zhu, H. District heating and cooling optimization and enhancement—Towards integration of renewables, storage and smart grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, A.; Versace, M. Multi-objective optimization for the maximization of the operating share of cogeneration system in District Heating Network. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 139, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameri, M.; Besharati, Z. Optimal design and operation of district heating and cooling networks with CCHP systems in a residential complex. Energy Build. 2016, 110, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verrilli, F.; Parisio, A.; Glielmo, L. Stochastic model predictive control for optimal energy management of district heating power plants, in Decision and Control (CDC). In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 55th Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 12–14 December 2016; pp. 807–812. [Google Scholar]
- Gładysz, P.; Ziębik, A. Complex analysis of the optimal coefficient of the share of cogeneration in district heating systems. Energy 2013, 62, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, P. Modeling, Analysis and Optimization of Integrated Energy Systems for Multigeneration Purposes. In Mechanical Engineering; University of Ontario Institute of Technology: Oshawa, ON, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Irvine, J.T.S.; Connor, P. Solid Oxide Fuels Cells: Facts and Figures: Past Present and Future Perspectives for SOFC Technologies; Springer: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Szega, M.; Żymełka, P. Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis of the Production of Electricity, Heat And Cold in the CHP Unit with the Absorption Chillers. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017, 140, 052002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciampi, G.; Rosato, A.; Scorpio, M.; Sibilio, S. Experimental analysis of a micro-trigeneration system composed of a micro-cogenerator coupled with an electric chiller. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 73, 1309–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmero-Marrero, A.I.; Oliveira, A.C. Performance simulation of a solar-assisted micro-tri-generation system: Hotel case study. Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 2011, 6, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malico, I.; Carvalhinho, A.P.; Tenreiro, J. Design of a trigeneration system using a high-temperature fuel cell. Int. J. Energy Res. 2008, 33, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Leong, K. Numerical study of an internal-reforming solid oxide fuel cell and adsorption chiller co-generation system. J. Power Sources 2006, 159, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigurjonsson, H.; Clausen, L.R. Solution for the future smart energy system: A polygeneration plant based on reversible solid oxide cells and biomass gasification producing either electrofuel or power. Appl. Energy 2018, 216, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigarchian, S.G.; Malmquist, A.; Martin, V. The choice of operating strategy for a complex polygeneration system: A case study for a residential building in Italy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 163, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calise, F.; Figaj, R.D.; Vanoli, L. A novel polygeneration system integrating photovoltaic/thermal collectors, solar assisted heat pump, adsorption chiller and electrical energy storage: Dynamic and energy-economic analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 149, 798–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jradi, M.; Riffat, S. Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 396–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Moussawi, H.; Fardoun, F.; Louahlia-Gualous, H. Review of tri-generation technologies: Design evaluation, optimization, decision-making, and selection approach. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 120, 157–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernard, A. Micro Combined Heat and Power Operating on Renewable Energy for Residential Building. Ph.D. Thesis, CEP-Centre Energétique et Procédés, Paris, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Akikur, R.; Saidur, R.; Ping, H.; Ullah, K. Performance analysis of a co-generation system using solar energy and SOFC technology. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 79, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmer, T.; Worall, M.; Wu, S.; Riffat, S.B. Fuel cell technology for domestic built environment applications: State of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 913–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellamla, H.R.; Staffell, I.; Bujlo, P.; Pollet, B.G.; Pasupathi, S. Current status of fuel cell based combined heat and power systems for residential sector. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- US DOE. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; US DOE: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
- Entchev, E.; Yang, L.; Ghorab, M.; Lee, E. Simulation of hybrid renewable microgeneration systems in load sharing applications. Energy 2013, 50, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oland, C.B. Guide to Low-Emission Boiler and Combustion Equipment Selection; The Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Oland, C.B. Guide to Combined Heat and Power Systems for Boiler Owners and Operators; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
- Bensaid, S.; Brignone, M.; Ziggiotti, A.; Specchia, S. High efficiency Thermo-Electric power generator. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 1385–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terayama, T.; Nagata, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Momma, A.; Kato, T.; Yamamoto, A. Improvement of SOFC System Efficiency by Incorporating Thermoelectric Power Generation Heat Exchanger. ECS Trans. 2013, 57, 2627–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonar, D.; Soni, S.; Sharma, D. Micro-trigeneration for energy sustainability: Technologies, tools and trends. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 71, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siyal, S.H.; Mentis, D.; Howells, M. Economic analysis of standalone wind-powered hydrogen refueling stations for road transport at selected sites in Sweden. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9855–9865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Ghoshal, S.K. Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojić, D.L.; Marčeta, M.P.; Sovilj, S.P.; Miljanić, Š.S. Hydrogen generation fromwater electrolysis—Possibilities of energy saving. J. Power Sources 2003, 118, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, S. Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27, 235–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabbani, H.; Dincer, I.; Rahnamayan, S. A novel multigenerational hydrogen production system: Performance evaluation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 12888–12895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarhaddi, F.; Farahat, S.; Ajam, H.; Behzadmehr, A.; Adeli, M.M. An improved thermal and electrical model for a solar photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) air collector. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 2328–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suberu, M.Y.; Mustafa, M.W.; Bashir, N. Energy storage systems for renewable energy power sector integration and mitigation of intermittency. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahlia, T.; Saktisahdan, T.; Jannifar, A.; Hasan, M.; Matseelar, H. A review of available methods and development on energy storage; technology update. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- New Mexico Environment Department. Air-Water Temperature Correlation; Surface Water Quality Bureau: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2011.
- Ang, S.M.C.; Fraga, E.S.; Brandon, N.P.; Samsatli, N.J.; Brett, D.J. Fuel cell systems optimisation—Methods and strategies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 14678–14703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isa, Z.M.; Rahim, N.A. PEM fuel cell model parameters optimization using modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Clean Energy and Technology (CEAT), Langkawi, Malaysia, 18–20 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ramadhani, F.; Abu Bakar, K.; Shafer, M.G. Optimization of standalone street light system with consideration of lighting control. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technological Advances in Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (TAEECE), Konya, Turkey, 9–11 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ramadhani, F.; Abu Bakar, K.; Hussain, M.; Erixno, O.; Nazir, R. Optimization with traffic-based control for designing standalone streetlight system: A case study. Renew. Energy 2016, 105, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, A.; Chandra, H.; Arora, A. Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamad, H.; Abu Bakar, A.; Ping, H.; Mokhlis, H. An adaptive controller of hydro generators for smart grid application in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology, Hangzhou, China, 24–28 October 2010; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Burer, M.; Tanaka, K.; Favrat, D.; Yamada, K. Multi-criteria optimization of a district cogeneration plant integrating a solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine combined cycle, heat pumps and chillers. Energy 2003, 28, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akikur, R.K.; Saidur, R.; Ullah, K.R.; Hajimolana, S.A.; Ping, H.W.; Hussain, M.A. Economic feasibility analysis of a solar energy and solid oxide fuel cell-based cogeneration system in Malaysia. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 18, 669–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahlia, T.M.I.; Chan, P. Life cycle cost analysis of fuel cell based cogeneration system for residential application in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Moussawi, H.; Fardoun, F.; Louahlia, H. 4-E based optimal management of a SOFC-CCHP system model for residential applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 151, 607–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eleventh Malaysia Plan, Strategy Paper 17: Sustainable Usage of Energy to Support Growth; Federal Government Administrative Centre: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2017.
- Genovese, M.; Fragiacomo, P. Hydrogen station evolution towards a poly-generation energy system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 47, 12264–12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, I.A.; Fisher, J.T.; Frome, P.E.; Smith, B.O.; Guo, S.; Chanda, S.; McFeely, M.S.; Miller, A.M.; Leachman, J.W. Low-cost, transportable hydrogen fueling station for early market adoption of fuel cell electric vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 8122–8127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakui, T.; Kawayoshi, H.; Yokoyama, R. Optimal structural design of residential power and heat supply devices in consideration of operational and capital recovery constraints. Appl. Energy 2016, 163, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atsonios, K.; Samlis, C.; Manou, K.; Nikolopoulos, A.; Sfetsioris, K.; Mitsotakis, A.; Grammelis, P. Technical assessment of LNG based polygeneration systems for non-interconnected island cases using SOFC. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 46, 4827–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holagh, S.G.; Haghghi, M.A.; Mohammadi, Z.; Chitsaz, A. Exergoeconomic and environmental investigation of an innovative poly-generation plant driven by a solid oxide fuel cell for production of electricity, cooling, desalinated water, and hydrogen. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 10126–10154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Zhuang, Y.; Song, M.; Li, W.; Du, J. Techno-economic and carbon footprint feasibility assessment for polygeneration process of carbon-capture coal-to-methanol/power and molten carbonate fuel cell. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 235, 114015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Mao, T.; Sui, J.; Jin, H. Life cycle assessment (LCA) optimization of solar-assisted hybrid CCHP system. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mago, P.J.; Fumo, N.; Chamra, L.M. Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the thermal and electric load. Int. J. Energy Res. 2009, 33, 852–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mago, P.; Chamra, L.; Ramsay, J. Micro-combined cooling, heating and power systems hybrid electric-thermal load following operation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2010, 30, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.; Luck, R.; Mago, P.J. Analysis of a combined cooling, heating, and power system model under different operating strategies with input and model data uncertainty. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 2231–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Wu, J.; Zhai, X. A novel operation strategy for CCHP systems based on minimum distance. Appl. Energy 2014, 128, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavvadias, K.; Maroulis, Z. Multi-objective optimization of a trigeneration plant. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajabdollahi, H.; Ganjehkaviri, A.; Jaafar, M.N.M. Assessment of new operational strategy in optimization of CCHP plant for different climates using evolutionary algorithms. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 75, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basrawi, F.; Yamada, T.; Obara, S. Economic and environmental based operation strategies of a hybrid photovoltaic–microgas turbine trigeneration system. Appl. Energy 2014, 121, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kavvadias, K.; Tosios, A.; Maroulis, Z. Design of a combined heating, cooling and power system: Sizing, operation strategy selection and parametric analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Lera, S.; Ballester, J. Analysis and sizing of thermal energy storage in combined heating, cooling and power plants for buildings. Appl. Energy 2013, 106, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ondeck, A.D.; Edgar, T.F.; Baldea, M. Optimal operation of a residential district-level combined photovoltaic/natural gas power and cooling system. Appl. Energy 2015, 156, 593–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, A.; Fraga, E.S.; Brett, D.J. Modelling and Optimisation in Terms of CO2 Emissions of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell based Micro-CHP System in a Four Bedroom House in London. Energy Procedia 2013, 42, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hawkes, A.; Leach, M. Cost-effective operating strategy for residential micro-combined heat and power. Energy 2007, 32, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkes, A.; Aguiar, P.; Croxford, B.; Leach, M.; Adjiman, C.; Brandon, N. Solid oxide fuel cell micro combined heat and power system operating strategy: Options for provision of residential space and water heating. J. Power Sources 2007, 164, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghavifar, H.; Anvari, S.; Saray, R.K.; Khalilarya, S.; Jafarmadar, S. Towards modeling of combined cooling, heating and power system with artificial neural network for exergy destruction and exergy efficiency prognostication of tri-generation components. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 89, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anvari, S.; Taghavifar, H.; Saray, R.K.; Khalilarya, S.; Jafarmadar, S. Implementation of ANN on CCHP system to predict trigeneration performance with consideration of various operative factors. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 101, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Entchev, E. Residential fuel cell energy systems performance optimization using “soft computing” techniques. J. Power Sources 2003, 118, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Mu, H.; Li, N.; Ma, B. Optimal design and operation strategy for integrated evaluation of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) system. Energy 2016, 99, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaneb, O.A.; Taylor, P.C.; Coates, G. Real time operation of μCHP systems using fuzzy logic. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.M.P.; Ni, M. Economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell cogeneration/trigeneration system for hotels in Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2014, 75, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weber, C.; Marechal, F.; Favrat, D.; Kraines, S. Optimization of an SOFC-based decentralized polygeneration system for providing energy services in an office-building in Tōkyō. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2006, 26, 1409–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Antonucci, V.; Brunaccini, G.; De Pascale, A.; Ferraro, M.; Melino, F.; Orlandini, V.; Sergi, F. Integration of μ-SOFC Generator and ZEBRA Batteries for Domestic Application and Comparison with other μ-CHP Technologies. Energy Procedia 2015, 75, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nataf, K.; Bradley, T.H. An economic comparison of battery energy storage to conventional energy efficiency technologies in Colorado manufacturing facilities. Appl. Energy 2016, 164, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabari, F.; Nojavan, S.; Ivatloo, B.M.; Sharifian, M.B. Optimal short-term scheduling of a novel tri-generation system in the presence of demand response programs and battery storage system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 122, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isa, N.M.; Das, H.S.; Tan, C.W.; Yatim, A.; Lau, K.Y. A techno-economic assessment of a combined heat and power photovoltaic/fuel cell/battery energy system in Malaysia hospital. Energy 2016, 112, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misra, S.; Satyaprasad, G.R.K.D.; Mahapatra, S.S.; Mohanty, A.; Biswal, S.R.; Dora, A. Design of Fuel cell based Cogeneration systems: An approach for battery less Solar PV system. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2016, 3, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
- Fragiacomo, P.; Lucarelli, G.; Genovese, M.; Florio, G. Multi-objective optimization model for fuel cell-based poly-generation energy systems. Energy 2021, 237, 121823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardona, E.; Piacentino, A. A methodology for sizing a trigeneration plant in mediterranean areas. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 1665–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghernejad, A.; Yaghoubi, M.; Jafarpur, K. Optimum power performance of a new integrated SOFC-trigeneration system by multi-objective exergoeconomic optimization. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2015, 73, 899–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcuri, P.; Beraldi, P.; Florio, G.; Fragiacomo, P. Optimal design of a small size trigeneration plant in civil users: A MINLP (Mixed Integer Non Linear Programming Model). Energy 2015, 80, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmer, T. A Novel SOFC Tri-Generation System for Building Applications; University of Nottingham: Nottingham, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez-Lera, S.; Ballester, J. A novel method for the design of CHCP (combined heat, cooling and power) systems for buildings. Energy 2010, 35, 2972–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Windeknecht, M.; Tzscheutschler, P. Optimization of the Heat Output of High Temperature Fuel Cell Micro-CHP in Single Family Homes. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 2160–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liso, V.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, W.; Nielsen, M.P. Modelling of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell CHP System Coupled with a Hot Water Storage Tank for a Single Household. Energies 2015, 8, 2211–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Facci, A.L.; Cigolotti, V.; Jannelli, E.; Ubertini, S. Technical and economic assessment of a SOFC-based energy system for combined cooling, heating and power. Appl. Energy 2017, 192, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-J.; Jing, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-F. Optimization of capacity and operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Liu, W.J.; Cai, J.J.; Hong, B.W.; Wang, C.S. A two-stage optimal planning and design method for combined cooling, heat and power microgrid system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 74, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhai, Z.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, C. Optimization design of BCHP system to maximize to save energy and reduce environmental impact. Energy 2010, 35, 3388–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhai, Z.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, C. Particle swarm optimization for redundant building cooling heating and power system. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 3668–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakui, T.; Yokoyama, R. Impact analysis of sampling time interval and battery installation on optimal operational planning of residential cogeneration systems without electric power export. Energy 2015, 81, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Wu, Q.; Li, Z.; Wang, M. Investigation of a CHP-EES based on Dymola. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), Ningbo, China, 19–22 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Antonucci, V.; Branchini, L.; Brunaccini, G.; De Pascale, A.; Ferraro, M.; Melino, F.; Orlandini, V.; Sergi, F. Thermal integration of a SOFC power generator and a Na–NiCl2 battery for CHP domestic application. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 1256–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajabdollahi, Z.; Fu, P.-F. Multi-objective based configuration optimization of SOFC-GT cogeneration plant. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 112, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Zheng, C. Analysis of tri-generation system in combined cooling and heating mode. Energy Build. 2014, 72, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazempoor, P.; Dorer, V.; Ommi, F. Evaluation of hydrogen and methane-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell systems for residential applications: System design alternative and parameter study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 8630–8644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazempoor, P.; Dorer, V.; Weber, A. Modelling and evaluation of building integrated SOFC systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 13241–13249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdikaris, N.; Panopoulos, K.; Hofmann, P.; Spyrakis, S.; Kakaras, E. Design and exergetic analysis of a novel carbon free tri-generation system for hydrogen, power and heat production from natural gas, based on combined solid oxide fuel and electrolyser cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, R.; Kazempoor, P. Application of SOFCs in Combined Heat, Cooling, and Power Systems. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: From Materials to System Modeling; Ni, M., Zhao, T.S., Eds.; Energy and Environment Series; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, S.; Klobodu, E.K.M.; Apio, A. Renewable and non-renewable energy, regime type and economic growth. Renew. Energy 2018, 125, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baul, T.; Datta, D.; Alam, A. A comparative study on household level energy consumption and related emissions from renewable (biomass) and non-renewable energy sources in Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2018, 114, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayan, S.; Doytch, N. An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption. Energy Econ. 2017, 68, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosato, A.; Sibilio, S.; Ciampi, G.; Entchev, E.; Ribberink, H. Energy, Environmental and Economic Effects of Electric Vehicle Charging on the Performance of a Residential Building-integrated Micro-trigeneration System. Energy Procedia 2017, 111, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tie, C.H.; Gan, C.K.; Ibrahim, K.A. The impact of electric vehicle charging on a residential low voltage distribution network in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wakui, T.; Wada, N.; Yokoyama, R. Energy-saving effect of a residential polymer electrolyte fuel cell cogeneration system combined with a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 77, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aviso, K.B.; Tan, R.R. Fuzzy P-graph for optimal synthesis of cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Energy 2018, 154, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andiappan, V.; Ng, D.K. Synthesis of tri-generation systems: Technology selection, sizing and redundancy allocation based on operational strategy. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 91, 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.; Yang, C.; Zhou, N. Synthesis/design optimization of SOFC–PEM hybrid system under uncertainty. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Prime Movers | Reciprocating Engines | Gas Turbine | Stirling Engines | Steam Turbine | Rankine Engines | Fuel Cells |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advantages | Effective part load performance, very flexible and quick start-up time necessary. | Low maintenance requirements, flexible and compact design and moderate output heat temperature. | Low noise and emission levels, appropriate for household use and possible operation using renewable energy. | Flexibility in fuel, including renewable energy, long life cycle, high system efficiency and flexibility in fuel-to-heat ratio. | Simple design, increased flexibility, low operating temperature and pressure and a wide fuel range are necessary. | High output temperature, low operation emission and noise and high electrical efficiency. |
Disadvantages | A substantial number of moving parts, mechanical solid noise and vibration and a high rate of emission. | Inefficient part load performance, unsuitable for start/stop application. | Long start-up time, high investment cost, limited adaptability component. | Bulk construction High initial cost, slow response at partial load, slow start up. | Low efficiency, infrequent research and commercialism in the ORC field. | High capital and investment cost, the design is complex. |
Size capacity | Up to 75 MW | Up to 250 MW | Up to 55 kW | 50 kW to 100 MW | Up to 250 MW | Up to 2 MW |
Electric efficiency | 25–45% | 18–36% | 15–35% | 10–37% | 15–38% | 37–60% |
System efficiency | 65–80% | 65–75% | 60–80% | 60–80% | 80% | 55–80% |
Life time (h) | 20,000–50,000 | 5000–40,000 | 10,000–30,000 | 50,000–100,000 | 30,000–50,000 | 10,000–65,000 |
Fuels used | Diesel, natural gas, propane. | Natural gas, biogas, propane, distillate oil. | Any fuel (natural gas and bio-fuels). | Any fuel (natural gas, bio-fuels and renewable energies). | Any fuel (natural gas and bio-fuels). | Hydrogen, natural gas, propane, methane. |
Electrical-to-thermal ratio | 0.5–1 | 0.4–0.7 | 0.15–0.4 | 0.9–1.13 | 0.15–0.4 | 0.5–2 |
Waste heat temperature (°C) | 80–200 | 120–350 | Up to 85 | Up to 85 | Up to 100 | Up to 1000 |
Thermal output (kJ/kWh) | 3376–5908 | 3376–7174 | - | - | 1065–52,753 | 1900–4431 |
Part load efficiency | High | Low | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Very high |
Start-up time | >10 s | >10 min | - | >5 h | >1 h | >3 h |
Noise level | High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Investment cost ($/kWe) | 340–1600 | 450–1500 | 1300–2000 | 2000–32,000 | 1000–2000 | 2500–3500 |
NOx emissions (Kg/MWh) | Up to 10 | 0.1–0.5 | 0.23 | Fuel dependent | Fuel dependent | 0.005–0.01 |
CO2 emissions (Kg/MWh) | Up to 650 | 580–720 | 672 | Fuel dependent | Fuel dependent | 430–490 |
Fuel Cell Type | PEMFC | AFC | DMFC | PAFC | MCFC | SOFC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating temp (℃) | 30–100 | 90–100 | 50–100 | 160–220 | 600–700 | 500–1000 |
Electrical efficiency (power) (%) | 30–40 | 60 | 20–25 | 40–42 | 43–47 | 50–60 |
System efficiency (heat and power) (%) | 85–90 | 85 | 85 | 85–90 | 85 | Up to 90 |
Typical stack size | <1 kW–100 kW | 10 kW–100 kW | Up to 1.5 kW | 50 kW–1 MW (250 kW typical module) | <1 kW–1 MW (250 kW typical module) | 5 kW–3 MW |
Electrolyte | Solid polymeric membrane | An aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide soaked in a matrix | Solid organic polymer poly-perfluorosulfonic acid | 100% phosphoric acid stabilized in a SiC-based matrix | Li2CO3/K2CO3 materials that are stabilized in an alumina-based matrix | Solid and stabilized zirconia ceramic matrix with free oxide ions |
Fuels | Methanols or hydrocarbons | Pure hydrogen | Methanol | Natural gas | Natural gas, biogas, others | Natural gas or propane, hydrocarbons or methanol |
Applications | Transportation, DG, backup power, portable electricity and speciality vehicles. | Military, space, backup power, transportation | Consumer goods, laptops and mobile phones | Distributed generations (DG) | Electric utilities, distributed generations | Electric utilities, distributed generations, and auxiliary powers |
Advantages | Advanced start-up time, varies output quickly, compact, no corrosive fluid used | Lower cost components due to a broader range of stable materials, low temperature, quick start-up | A high density of energy storage, no reforming required, easy storage and transport | High cogeneration efficiency | High efficiency, scalable and flexibility of fuel | Internal reformation is made possible by high temperature, which eliminates the need for liquid electrolytes, makes high-temperature, valuable output for various applications and does not require pure H2 (low-price fuel) |
Disadvantages | Expensive platinum catalysts used, high-purity H2 required | Sensitive to CO2 in both air and fuel, electrolyte conductivity, aqueous electrolyte management (polymer) | Low power output, methanol is toxic and flammable | High-cost catalysts, long start-up time, sulphur sensitivity | High-temperature corrosion and cell component failure, low power density and a lengthy start-up time | Lengthy start-up times, problems with temperature stress during load after the operation and the need for pricey, heat-resistant materials |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ramadhani, F.; Hussain, M.A.; Mokhlis, H.; Erixno, O. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Polygeneration Systems in Residential Applications: A Review of Technology, Energy Planning and Guidelines for Optimizing the Design. Processes 2022, 10, 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102126
Ramadhani F, Hussain MA, Mokhlis H, Erixno O. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Polygeneration Systems in Residential Applications: A Review of Technology, Energy Planning and Guidelines for Optimizing the Design. Processes. 2022; 10(10):2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102126
Chicago/Turabian StyleRamadhani, Farah, M. A. Hussain, Hazlie Mokhlis, and Oon Erixno. 2022. "Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Polygeneration Systems in Residential Applications: A Review of Technology, Energy Planning and Guidelines for Optimizing the Design" Processes 10, no. 10: 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102126
APA StyleRamadhani, F., Hussain, M. A., Mokhlis, H., & Erixno, O. (2022). Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Polygeneration Systems in Residential Applications: A Review of Technology, Energy Planning and Guidelines for Optimizing the Design. Processes, 10(10), 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102126